All Episodes
Previous Next
June 15, 2011 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:52
June 15, 2011, Wednesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Well, Huma Weiner is back in town.
No, Huma Weiner.
I mean, she's married.
Name is Huma Abadin or Abadine, but Huma Weiner.
They caught her in her car getting back into the country.
She just got a whole lot of lessons from Hillary about throwing lamps and shoes.
And so she prepared for her reunion with Weiner.
Greetings, my friends.
Hi, Rachel.
How are you?
Great to have you all with us today.
Rush Limbaugh, the EIB Network, and the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Ladies and gentlemen, today is a day in broadcast history that you will not forget.
In a short while, you're about to join me in a secret that I've known for months, been working on for months, almost a full year.
We had to preserve this secret for a full year.
You'll understand why when you find out what it is.
If you are the kind of person that marks your calendar, mark down June 15th, 2011 in the annals of EIB network history.
You were there.
And in fact, you're going to be a major part of it.
And I'll give you all the details in due course as the program unfolds right before your very eyes and ears.
There are some news things I want to get to here, ladies and gentlemen.
First off, you remember the other day we started on the program with a story that emanated from the UK about Margaret Thatcher and Palin.
And somebody in Thatcher's camp had said, no, Thatcher's not going to meet with Palin.
She's nuts.
And I, L. Rushball, entertained this with a long discussion on this program.
I know Margaret Thatcher, and I've spent a lot of time with her, and that's not who she is.
Even if she felt that, she wouldn't say it.
And she wouldn't allow any of her staff to say it.
It was the UK Guardian, a big liberal.
No, I'm not stringing them along.
Snurdly, would you stop this?
It was going to happen in this hour.
It's a three-hour program.
We've got lots of stuff here to do.
Folks, it's not anything that you're guessing.
There's no way you would guess this.
It's not anything that's obvious.
I mean, some of the guesses have been, Catherine is pregnant.
No.
That we've adopted a bit.
No.
That I'm going to go on a television.
No.
No, it's not a political announcement.
Well, no, it's not another puppy.
We are getting another puppy in August, though.
I can announce that, but it's not that.
Yeah, we're going to get another sheepdog.
We're either going to name it Camelot or Guinevere to go along with Abby and Wellesley.
But that's not the announcement.
Yeah, no, they're not going to need any sheep soon.
The three dogs are quite enough.
Anyway, on this Margaret Thatcher business, once again, I was right.
Turns out that whole thing was essentially a hoax.
The whole thing was made up that nobody in Palin's care, in Margaret Thatcher's camp, ever did say that Margaret Thatcher wouldn't meet with Palin because Palin's nuts.
And the UK Guardian had a lot of fun with this Rush Limbaugh wrong on Margaret Thatcher and Sarah Palin.
U.S. talk show host denounces Guardian for reporting why former prime minister will not be meeting darling of tea party movement.
Rush Limbaugh, the U.S. Conservative radio host, was angry on Wednesday after I blogged that Lady Thatcher would not receive Sarah Palin if the darling of the Tea Party movement visits London in July.
Limbaugh opened his show with a lengthy denunciation of the Guardian after I quoted an ally of Thatcher on Tuesday describing pain on his nuts.
And they quote me and what I said.
They try to back up their story.
Then yesterday there was this, and this ran in the legal insurrection blog.
A week ago, the Guardian reported that Margaret Thatcher was refusing to meet with Sarah Palin, attributing a quote to an ally of Thatcher as follows.
Lady Thatcher will not be seeing Sarah Palin.
That'd be belittling for Margaret.
Sarah Palin is nuts.
Turns out the Guardian story was a hoax, as reported by Niall Gardner at the UK Telegraph, who wrote, I have spoken to Lady Thatcher's private orifice regarding the story.
They confirm that the attack on Sarah Palin definitely did not come from her office and in no way reflects her views.
As a former aide to Margaret Thatcher myself, writes Mr. Gardner, I can attest that this kind of thinking is entirely alien to her and that such remarks would never be made by her office.
Exactly what I told you.
She has always warmly welcomed like-minded figures in the United States.
She has in the past met with numerous U.S. presidential candidates and political dignitaries when they visited London, but at the age of 85, she's now able to receive very few visitors at all because she's suffering from dementia.
It's a sad thing, but she really is.
So I just wanted to square this.
Once again, you're on the cutting edge if you listen regularly and religiously to this program.
The left is just relentless in this.
Just as, have you noticed Obama continues talking about, he's not a partisan.
He told his crowd yesterday or a couple days ago, look, if you're looking for partisan rhetoric for me, you're not going to get it.
Have you noticed how he's still harping on the failed policies of the past?
And what he means by that is life under the Bush administration.
Now, I don't know about you, but life under the Bush administration qualifies as the good old days.
Weren't the failed policies of the past under Bush far better than the failed policies of today under Obama?
I mean, for crying out loud, folks, let's be real.
The failed policies of the past.
George W. Bush, okay?
Unemployment 5% versus 9.1% with Obama.
A GDP that was three times gross domestic product under Bush, three times what it is today.
A deficit under the failed policies of the past, that was minuscule compared to Obama's deficit.
Under the failed policies of the past, we had a record 50 consecutive months of job creation.
50.
That's over four years, month-to-month consecutive growth in job creation.
There was practically no inflation during the Bush years, the failed policies of the past.
And even during the Bush years and the failed policies of the past, people were able to fill up their gas tanks in their cars.
Their houses were worth something during the failed policies of the past.
People's asset values still existed.
Their homes were above water.
Most of us would call that a golden age.
You come to think of it, what Obama calls the failed policies of the past are what most of us would call American capitalism, Which is actually what has made us the richest nation in the world.
But what Obama's doing is trotting all this language out.
Failed policies of the past.
Needs a little more time for his policies to take effect.
The failed policies of the past dug us in so deep, we need even more stimulus.
That's what's being bargained for here.
Trot out the same old lines to try to pitch for another round of stimulus spending.
I mean, after all, folks, there's an election coming up.
Those votes are not going to buy themselves.
Obama, the Democrats, are so addicted to stimulus, they should follow Weiner into rehab.
I like that name, Huma Weiner.
I wonder if his name weren't Weiner, would this scandal be half what it is?
I don't know.
At any rate, getting them to go to rehab would require one of the biggest interventions in American history, bigger even than the 2010 midterms.
And here from the Weekly Standard, their blog, Jeffrey Anderson, Obama 0 for 4 on extremely important issues.
And this we have also mentioned on this program countless times.
No matter where you look, issue by issue by issue, a majority of the American people oppose Obama's policies and oppose Obama.
And this is a new CNN poll.
It shows which issues Americans say will most influence their votes in next year's presidential election.
The issues that respondents most often listed as being extremely important were the economy, 51%, health care, 45%, unemployment, 45%, and the federal deficits at 44%.
That's pretty high.
In another recent poll, CNN found registered Americans' verdicts on how Obama is doing and meeting their expectations on most of these issues.
And it ain't good.
By a margin of 17 points, 58 to 41, Americans disapprove of Obama's handling of the economy.
And he wants to talk to us about the failed policies of the past.
58 to 41 CNN poll.
Americans disapprove of Obama's handling of the economy by a margin of 17 points again, 57 to 40 percent.
Americans disapprove of his handling of health care by a margin of 30 points, 64 to 34 percent.
America's disapproved of his handling of the deficit.
Now, let's move to the precious independents.
Ah, yes, that group of Americans eagerly sought by virtually every political consultant.
That group of Americans eagerly sought by virtually every political expert and pundit.
The independents, that's where the election's won or lost, they say.
Well, the independents are even less impressed with the won.
By a margin of 29 points, 64 to 35 percent, independents disapprove of Obama's handling of the economy.
These are the people, if we're to believe what we're told, who are largely responsible for Obama's winning in 2008.
The people who thoroughly bought into this BS, there being a new day, a new kind of politician, post-partisan, post-racial.
America will be loved again.
The sea levels will be lowered.
All of this rotgut.
These are the people who bought into it.
The people who have been conned into hating George W. Bush as some kind of an incompetent.
The independents, 64 to 35 percent, 29 points disapprove of Obama's handling of the economy.
I also told you this stuff for you to be confident, folks, and to not fall prey to the temptations of getting depressed simply because the media will not tell you in the middle.
I don't know if CNN's had this on television.
It's on their website.
I don't know if you've seen this on CNN TV.
I don't, this is this data is not widespread and not widely reported.
A margin of 31 points here, independents.
64 to 33 percent disapprove Obama's handling of health care by a margin of 42 points.
70 to 28 percent independents disapprove of Obama's handling of the deficit, meaning debt and spending and stimulus and the so-called wonderful policies of the present to counteract the failed policies of the past.
Obama is a tofer, he is on the wrong side of American opinion on almost every important issue.
And on top of that, he's on the wrong side of history.
And try this, folks.
This is not good.
Iran's president has called for a post-Soviet security alliance to unite in an alliance against the West.
This is from the Associated Press from Kazakhstan.
Another way to put this: U.S. enemies are having a coming-out party with Iran.
So, how's that Cairo speech working out for you?
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmedinezad called Wednesday for a security alliance of several former Soviet nations and the CHICOMs to form a united front against us and the Brits.
Ahmedine Zad's address to fellow heads of state at the summit of the Shanghai Corporation Organization in Kazakhstan will likely deepen suspicions that the bloc is intended as a counterweight to the U.S. across the region.
Of course, it is.
Much of Ahmedine Zad's fiery speech devoted to leveling an exhaustive series of thinly veiled accusations against unnamed Western countries, which he described as enslavers, colonialists, and invaders.
It sounds like Obama.
That sounds like the way Obama and most of the Democrats talk.
So there you have it.
Failed policies of the past, the good old days, the glory days.
The failed policies of the present are roundly disapproved in every corner of this country, wherever you go, in whatever demographic, other than blacks.
That's the only area demographically where Obama still has major support.
And by the way, audio subject number one here.
This is, let's go back to February 2, 2009.
This is Obama on the Today Show being interviewed by Mao Wauer.
Ma Wauer said, At some point, will you say, wait a minute, we've spent this amount of money, meaning the stimulus.
We're not seeing the results.
We got to change course dramatically.
Is there at some point, might that happen?
Look, I'm at the start of my administration.
One nice thing about the situation I find myself in is that I will be held accountable.
I've got four years.
You need to know quickly how people feel about what's happening.
That's exactly right.
And, you know, a year from now, I think people are going to see that we're starting to make some progress, but there's still going to be some pain out there.
If I don't have this done in three years, then there's going to be a one-term proposition.
He's pretty accurate in describing his future there.
That's Obama being a one-termer if he didn't fix the economy in three years, and it's getting worse.
Nearly 2 million jobs lost in the greatest economy and nation in history since Obama took office.
Nearly 2 million jobs lost with all kinds of Keynesian federal spending designed ostensibly to create that many jobs and more.
All right, folks, this table is set a brief time out.
We'll come back.
Your phone calls, part of the program as always at 800-282-2882.
Sit tight.
We'll be right back.
There was fabulous news out of Wisconsin yesterday.
Welcome back, Rush Limbaugh, serving humanity simply by showing up, simply by being here, executing assigned host duties flawlessly, zero mistakes.
Wisconsin's polarizing union rights law.
And by the way, this is an AP story, and they're hyperventilating.
They can't stand it.
The union rights law will take effect thanks to a sharply divided ruling by the state Supreme Court that smacked down this judge like I haven't seen a judge smacked down by a court in a long time.
The Wisconsin state Supreme Court determined that the judge, Sumi, overstepped her authority when she voided the governor's plan to strip most public workers of their collective bargaining rights.
The ruling Tuesday evening, a major victory for Republican Governor Scott Walker, who said the law was needed to help address the state's $3.6 billion budget shortfall.
In a 4-3 decision, it included a blistering dissent.
The Supreme Court ruled that Dane County Circuit Judge Marianne Sumey overstepped when she declared the law void last month.
Robert B. Rice, former labor secretary, is beside himself over this.
Last night he was in the arena on CNN.
Unions had been the backbone of the middle class, the working class, and the Democratic Party.
Republican efforts to undermine unions, and they've looked for this opportunity to put working people against people or other working people, whether it's unionized versus non-unionized or public sector unions versus non-public sector unions or to some extent immigrants against native-born.
This whole approach that we are kind of a poor nation, we are scrambling after crumbs.
If you get something, and that means less for me, without recognition that we are richer than we've ever been, the GDP is higher than it was before the Great Recession.
But most of the gains of economic growth, certainly over the past 30 years, have gone to the top 1%.
And of course, the underlying theory here of the Labor Secretary Reich is that union workers are at the bottom of the dregs.
I mean, they are just barely making a living when, of course, they are the ones in the top 1%.
Anyway, it was a huge slapdown, and it was a major upper for all of us concerned about what's right and for the future of these kinds of relationships.
I'll get the ditto cam turned on here in just a second.
I know that it's off.
It's off for a reason.
Robert B. Rice, don't forget, was the guy who said that he didn't want to see any stimulus money go to any white construction guys.
He wanted it to go to minorities and so forth and so on.
I mean, these people are just devastated over the Supreme Court ruling in Wisconsin.
Folks, when it was happening, we told you it was seminal because what was going on in Wisconsin was simply a money laundering operation.
Union workers paid by taxpayers.
Their salaries are then deducted.
Union dues are deducted, and those union dues end up back at the Democrat Party.
The stimulus money was used to keep those federal and state workers employed so their union dues would continue to be collected and funnel the Democrat Party.
And that's what has been overturned in large part, and that's why they're fit to be tied because now they have to go out and compete in the real world, in the marketplace, rather than have the game be rigged in their favor, and they're beside themselves.
All right, welcome back, Rush Limbaugh, the EIB Network, folks, as I've been alluding to, but not overdoing it in recent days.
Well, it's not really been stringing people along, but I'm going to have to give some advance notice.
I could just spring this on people.
But today is a day in broadcast history that I'm never going to forget, and I hope that you don't either.
Time to reveal the secret.
We've been working on this all by ourselves, almost for a year, pretty close to a year.
And we've done a very good job of keeping this thing a secret, and we had to, as you'll soon understand why.
It's time to introduce to you, my friends, a new product.
And there it is.
For those of you watching on the Ditto Cam, it is tea.
Two if by tea is the brand name.
And there I am in all of my glory on every bottle on the shrink wrap covering every six-pack as Rush Revere.
The liberals are coming, folks.
The liberals are coming, and it's time to warn everybody and have a little fun at the same time.
The product is called 2 If Buy Tea.
It's an iced tea.
Brand new iced tea available on the market today.
Unlike Apple, when we announce a product, it's available that day.
I thought about announcing it and saying available this fall.
No, we announce it.
It is available today.
It's not in stores.
You know why it's not in stores?
Because that wouldn't be fair.
We couldn't get it in every store.
So we want to make sure that it's available online so that everybody has an equal opportunity to access it.
There's also a phone number you can call to get the tea.
The website's very simple: 2ifbytea.com.
From tea to shining tea.
2IFB.com.
You can also order it.
Here it comes in 12 packs only.
We have four flavors.
Well, two flavors with variations on the flavors.
We have regular.
This stuff, it tastes just like my mother used to make iced tea when I was growing up.
It is the best iced tea of everything.
And you people who've been with me for a long time know that tea is a big deal to me.
I mean, this program has a long history with tea.
Finally, I decided to just do my own.
Stop messing around with it.
So we have regular tea and diet tea, and we have raspberry and diet raspberry.
And I'm telling, folks, it is kickbutt.
This stuff is just delicious.
2376 is the price per 12-pack.
A portion of every bottle sold goes to our wonderful friends at the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation.
Now, these people are the ones that dole out college scholarships to families of Marines killed in action.
And during major disasters like 9-11, the Oklahoma City bombing, the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation extends assistance to members of law enforcement throughout Federal Government Secret Service, ICE, you name it, not just the Marines, all branches of the military during major, major disasters.
We have been developing this for now.
I remember we started taste testing in October.
We gave these first two flavors our final blessing in January or February.
And the last day I took off a couple of weeks ago on a Wednesday was to go to our official bottler for the historic first bottling of 2 If by Tea so that I could be there and see it happen.
Now, we have the finest of everything in this tea.
We have, ladies and gentlemen, the finest tea itself.
We have the finest ingredients.
They're picked by the finest pickers, selected by the finest selectors and produced by the best producers.
That's us.
And we are doing this for the simple reason that we love tea and we wanted to share it with everybody else.
The product is not going to be in stores right away.
It's only going to be available online for the time being.
That's the best way that we could make it fair for everybody to experience and start to enjoy.
2 If by tea, make it available on a brand new website to accept your orders.
And again, it's 2ifbytea.com.
Now, there's a phone number you can call.
If you're not able to use a computer to order, the telephone number at our finest call center in the world is 866-662-1776.
The price per 12-packets only sold at 12 packs, and there's no returns.
We're not idiots.
They ask me, are you going to have a return policy?
What?
Folk, let me tell you something.
You're not going to want to return this.
You are going to want to chug it and you're going to regret you didn't order more after you taste it.
And you're going to keep the bottles.
We spared no expense.
The labels are works of art.
The shrink wrap is a work of art.
You're going to take this shrimp wrap, shrink wrap off with great care to save it.
You're not going to throw the bottles away.
It's the best label in the tea business.
It's the best shrink wrap to go along with the best tea.
We've got the best website.
We got the best call center.
We got the best of everything that's associated with this.
And as a special bonus, shipping is free.
We have included shipping in this.
It's El Fribo.
Here are the bottles.
That's what an individual bottle looks like inside the shrink wrap.
This happens to be the original sweet tea flavor.
That's the blue label with me as Rush Revere.
Sounding the warning, the liberals are coming.
This is the Diet Raspberry.
2IFBT.com is the website, and that's where our shop is.
And that's how you order it.
The website name, the same as the product name, 2IFBYT.com.
There is a price, and yes, there's profit why we're doing this, but a percentage of our profits go right to that charity, the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation.
And we'll be updating it as we go on and telling you more about it, the process, and how it all came to be and why.
But we're doing this ourselves.
We do not have a corporate partner.
We're it.
We have in this economy.
I, ladies and gentlemen, wanted to show, you know, have always said that when they give recessions, I choose not to participate.
I wanted to demonstrate that even in this economy, with an oppressive regime like the one we have standing in the way of economic growth, that it can still happen with ambition and with ingenuity and with desire.
So there you have it.
That's what we've been working on for nine months.
It's us.
We have done it from the ground floor all the way up.
There's not a corporate partner that you will find.
2IFBT.com or the telephone number 866-662-1776.
Sold as 12 packs only.
You choose the flavor that you want.
Shipping is three days.
If you want express shipping, you can get that.
And if there's shipping to Alaska and Hawaii, but there's a nominal charge for that.
The shipping is free in the continental $48 or $53, depending on how Obama counts.
2IFBYT.com.
We'll be back.
We'll continue here on the EIB network right after this.
And we're back, Rush Limbaugh here on the Excellence in Broadcasting Network, the fastest three hours in media and the fastest week in media.
Here it is already Wednesday.
Now, if you are encountering difficulty getting into the shop at 2ifbytea.com, remember, folks, we shut down websites here, even our own.
And we were really not able to mass live test this with the kind of crunch that we're getting today.
It just, it wasn't possible without giving it all away.
We really did everything we could to keep this under wraps for the last nine, actually, close to a year, last 11 months that we have been working on this.
The graphics, the logo, everything about it.
Again, the website up and running.
So if you're getting error messages, just hang in there and be tough.
You'll eventually be able to get in to the website at 2IFBT.com.
That's actually going to be the fastest way and the simplest way to access the product.
And wait till you do it.
Look at it.
It's my product, and I'm buying advertising from myself on this program.
I am now one of my own sponsors.
And I'm paying full rate card.
I'm paying full boat for this.
It is so good.
It is just, I mean, I'm hesitant to tell you what I like best because it'll cause a run on that.
What are you laughing at in there, Snerdly?
What is well?
That's what I'm saying.
This is a date to mark down on the calendar.
It's very well going to be a collector's item.
Well, you might get 12-pack to send to the White House.
It's, you know, it's been fun, and it's been an education, too.
And it's, you know, what I've found, I've found out what it's like now to be a sponsor on my program and wait for the campaign to begin.
It's been, well, we've created jobs here.
We've saved jobs.
We set out to do that in the face of the obstacles put in front of all of us by Pharaoh Obama.
All right, to the phones, we go to Pittsburgh.
We're going to start with Janice.
Great to have you on the program.
Hi and hello.
Hi, Rush.
Thank you so much for taking my call.
You bet.
My question is a numbers question.
The number being reported is 2 million jobs lost, but each week we're over 400,000.
I get that in five weeks.
Am I missing something?
I mean, the latest Maricon Million Man math.
Those are the people filing continuously.
Those are not brand new, just recently out-of-work people.
Those are people filing again to re-up for the continuation of their unemployment benefits, which now extend it in 99 months.
Almost 99 weeks.
It's almost two years now.
So the weekly jobs numbers are at 455,000 pieces, not 455,000 new from the previous week.
Okay.
Yeah, but it's it's a grand total of and and even the 2 million number is a little nebulous because that number does not count the people who have given up looking for work.
Those are just the number of jobs lost.
The universe of available jobs in the country has also shrunk, gotten smaller by virtue of the regimes done that themselves.
They have just said from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, they've just said there are fewer jobs to be had.
And the reason they've done that is to make the unemployment number stay at 9% rather than show up at close to 10 or even higher.
Right, which makes me wonder then how many people are actually working and paying taxes, and is that number available?
Because that's getting very low.
Well, it is, but it's a decreasing number, and tax revenues are down.
I mean, people are not earning as much.
I mean, people losing jobs the way they are and not getting raises and so forth.
Yeah, tax revenues are totally.
See, that is another thing, Janice.
The liberals all tell you we need to raise taxes.
We need to raise revenue.
And raising taxes does not raise revenue.
Lowering tax rates increases revenue.
The liberals are not about raising revenue.
If they cared about raising revenue, they wouldn't create such deficits.
They wouldn't go into such debt.
You know, the trouble here, Janice, is that the regime has been saying 2 million jobs lost from the recession since early 2009.
I mean, they've been using this number for almost three years now.
It's probably a heck of a lot more than that.
Your instincts are right in that regard, even though these weekly numbers of 450,000, 420,000 are confusing because it's not that many new unemployed each and every week.
Thanks much.
Appreciate the call.
This is Robin Shokan, New York.
Great to have you on the EIB Network, sir.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
Thanks for taking my call.
You bet, sir.
Appreciate everything you do.
I am an engineer schooled in automation and robotics.
Had to settle for a job in the government because I don't have much opportunity when I got out of college.
Currently, I'm developing a company that's exploiting automation, and I was really taken back yesterday.
I heard Obama get on Fox, or they had him on Fox, and he said, you know, automation is the reason we're losing jobs.
Yeah, ATM machines.
What a joke.
It's so funny because to me, I look at I'm trying to create a new product and put it on the market, and I'm going to use automation to make it feasible.
At the end of the day, it creates jobs.
It doesn't lose it.
It isn't even a shred of data to support that.
You are exactly right.
And once again, it shows, I don't know how else to say this.
You know, the relative utter ignorance or the insulting incompetence, whatever it is, of Obama to claim here that automation is doing its thing.
Okay, I'll tell you what.
If it's a great idea to get rid of ATM machines to boost job growth, let's get rid of front-end loaders and backhoes.
I mean, let's get rid of road graders.
You want shovel-ready jobs?
Let's get rid of all the machines, and let's get a thousand people out there digging trenches and all the things that all these backhoes and front-loaders do.
If an ATM machine is a job killer, then so is John Deere and Caterpillar.
You know, automation.
This T to If Buy T available today, historic announcement made by me a mere moments ago here in my own program.
We began bottling millions of bottles a couple of weeks ago at the best bottling plant in the country.
And I went there to watch it.
I've been fascinated by automation assembly lines and this kind of thing.
And to watch this, the giant vats.
By the way, we employed actual real food scientists.
And this is real tea.
And it is brewed in giant vats.
And these bottles are filled lickety split as they go through the assembly line.
The caps are placed on.
They're pasteurized.
And this assembly line has created jobs.
It has not, it would not be feasible for anybody with a bottled beverage to do it manually.
You couldn't meet the demand of the market.
And this is why I say, who is this guy?
Why do we turn to him for any of the answers?
He doesn't have any private sector experience with any of this.
Automation, ATM machines.
He doesn't have anybody in his regime that's ever been in the private sector.
Faculty lounge, academics, theoreticians with no hands-on experience whatsoever.
And they claim they are the ones who have all the answers.
Folks, be patient at the shop at 2IFBT.com.
I just tried it a bunch of times and I got in.
We're overwhelmed right now, which is understandable.
You be patient.
You'll get in today.
We'll handle all of you.
We'll handle the demand.
But food stamps are not acceptable.
▲
Export Selection