All Episodes
Previous Next
June 3, 2011 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:41
June 3, 2011, Friday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
It's Friday.
Live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida.
It's open line Friday.
Fastest three hours in media.
They go by lickety split.
ShowPEP for the rest of the media.
Establishing the news guardrails each and every day.
The program that keeps a semblance of sanity throughout the rest of the media, the rest of the busy broadcast day.
Rushlin Ball and the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
If you don't believe me, check out how helter skelter the whole media is when I'm not here.
Right, Dawn.
Telephone number 800-282-2882 if you want to be on the program.
Friday is different from Monday through Thursday on paper because people, callers do not have to talk about things that uh that I care about.
We lighten the restrictions that we place on callers on Friday, whatever you want to talk about.
If you think something's not been mentioned that should be mentioned, if you think I'm wrong about something, if you want to critical, if you have a question or comment, it'd have to be about the news.
It could be about virtually like last caller wanted to know what I thought of the cloud, which is uh supposed to be announced by Apple.
Well, it will be announced at their worldwide developers conference in San Francisco next week at the Musconi Center.
What they're going to be announcing the latest software Rev, which will be Lion OS 10.7, and then iOS 5, which is the software operating system for all the mobile devices.
The iPad, the iPhone, the iPod touch, uh, and then the cloud.
And the cloud, basically, you have iTunes and you've got music and television shows and movies on it.
All that stuff is going to go onto a server somewhere off-site.
You'll no longer have to keep it on your hard drives, freeing up all kinds of storage space if you want to.
Which means that you won't have to start syncing everything every time you want a song or a movie on your mobile device from your from your uh main master computer.
Your iPhone, your iPad, your iPod touch will be able to access all your music wherever you have an internet connection.
It'll also enable Apple's ability to spy on you even better.
I'm just kidding.
I just throwing that in there.
I mean, they've already have a cloud.
You know, they uh they already got this in a in a way.
It's called Mobile Me.
Uh, and you can already buy storage, uh, not for your music or movies.
I mean, well, you can put it there, but not operationally.
So this is uh it's an expansion of a what they just a giant server farm.
I look at me, I'm your average run-of-the-mill puke consumer on this stuff.
And I know if you try to watch video streamed from off-site, you better have a fast connection, or it's gonna buffer on you or pixelate or what have you.
So I don't know how that's gonna work out for people that don't have you know fast broadband connection.
They're working on 3G on cellular connection on how it's gonna work.
I've got uh a couple programs for my iPad and the iPhone where I can, it's called ITV.
It's a company called Ilgado, and it's really, it's really cool.
Uh it connects to one of my direct TV receivers at home, and I can watch live television off one of my direct TV receivers at home, wherever I am on the iPad or on the iPhone.
I can also record programs just like you do on DirecTV and access those.
So, for example, when I'm flying to Hawaii, you lose like I've got I've got uh like JetBlue has DirecTV on EIB 1, but you lose it outside the continental United States.
So flying over to Hawaii, what I do is I fire up the iPad if I want to watch television, and I watch it from home on the iPad.
Now, that's a satellite Wi-Fi connection, and some days it's not as fast as it is other days, and some days it pixelates.
Some days it buffers, some days the connection is not fast enough at all to handle it.
So it's not consistent.
It depends on a lot of variables.
And I would assume the Apple cloud is going to have the same problems to deal with.
But I also assume EYE TV.
EYE TV.
And there's another one called Air Video, which allows you also to access things that you've.
You need to buy a heart piece of hardware equipment.
It's not just an app.
There's more to it than it is the app, but you need hardware connection in order to make this work.
But it's cool, really is.
So essentially, I already have cloud capability with my iPhone or iPad.
So is everybody else who has this app has it connected.
So you're going to be able to access whatever you've already purchased on any device because it'll be on servers out there, i.e.
on the cloud.
And it has the potential to move everything on your computer off site if you want it to at some point.
A lot of people get worried about security, circumstances like that, which is a legitimate concern.
And I don't know anything more about it than what I've told you.
Well, like everybody else would have to wait for the uh for the big announcement to see what it is.
And there's rumors going back and forth is there going to be a new iPhone or not?
There always is a new iPhone in June.
No, no, no, the new iPhone will be put off till September or October, but they are going to tell us about the new software that'll show up on the phone at this uh at this conference.
So that's what the last caller was asking him.
Perfect open line Friday question.
Ideal open line Friday question.
Now, Jack Kavorkian has assumed room temperature at age 83.
And the New York Times has a uh uh obituary.
And they call him uh fiercely principled.
This is a guy who killed people.
This is a guy who took psychologically weak people and convinced them they'd be better off dead.
Fiercely principled.
I don't think they ever said anything like that in that laudatory in their obituary for William F. Buckley Jr. back in 2008.
Now, they do point out here Kavorkian was using uh one of one of the drugs that he was using in his so-called assisted suicide was Theopentol.
T H I O P E N T A L. Thiopendal, Theopental, whatever.
Uh it has been banned from death row in America because it's considered to be too inhumane.
That's what he was using.
The New York Times also gave Kavorkian his first interview the same day he performed his first assisted suicide in the back of a VW van.
The only thing missing was Arlo Guthrie.
And there's an excerpt in this in this uh obituary, there's an excerpt from a CNN interview from uh this time last year where Kavorkian says the worst moment of his life was the moment that he was born.
There's an interview with Dr. Sanjay Gupta.
There's the medical grand PUBA CNN.
Cavorkian shifted his gaze from his lawyer back to me.
Sanjay, you want to know the single worst moment of my life.
It wasn't a question I had asked, said Dr. Gupta.
But in fact, I was curious to know the answer.
Okay, what was the single worst moment of your life?
Kavorkian smiled.
And he said in a very deliberate, almost staccato voice, the single worst moment of my life was the moment I was born.
Fiercely principled.
Jack Kavorkian.
And he may have had a point.
Mr. Kavorkian suffered from ailments, and yet he stubbornly insisted on being treated in a Hospital and clinging to life.
The cause of his death was not immediately known, but local media reported that he had suffered from kidney and respiratory problems.
His condition had been worsening in recent days.
His death was confirmed by Jeff Feiger, the lawyer who represented him during several of his trials in the 1990s.
So no instant suicide for him, no 72 virgins for him.
Go convince everybody else that it's uh virtuous thing to die, but not for Jack Gavorki.
Listen to this.
Dr. Camorkian rediscovered the fascination with death, not as a private event, but as a focus of public policy.
Fiercely principled and highly inflexible.
Cavorkian rarely dated.
He never married.
He lived a penurious life, eating little, avoiding luxury, dressing in threadbare clothing that he often bought the Salvation Army and at Goodwill.
In 1976, bored with medicine, he moved to Long Beach, California, where he spent twelve years producing an unsuccessful movie about Handel's Messiah.
He painted and he wrote, supporting himself with part-time pathology positions at two hospitals.
But he wasn't crazy.
No, of course not.
Dr. Death, no way.
He was not crazy.
Thomas Friedman, the New York Times, who uh travels the world for the New York Times, writes about foreign policy.
Thomas Friedman thinks that the country that is the be all end all right now is China.
We need to be more like the Chikoms.
Well, Tom Friedman was on CNBC's Squawk Box today at a discussion about the unemployment numbers.
The co-host Becky Quick said to Thomas Friedman, Iran's trying to turn back the clock right now.
They're creating their own Iran net internet, where you can only see what they want you to see.
Can they do that, Tom?
Tom, can they do that?
So Friedman was being asked by CNBC.
Can the Iranians do that?
Is that fair, Tom?
Can they set up their own internet?
One of the things we've missed, and it relates to the job picture a little bit, is that this great what I call inflection, this technology diffusion and penetration has gone to a whole new degree.
It's affecting productivity.
We see that as driving productivity at higher and higher levels.
Companies able to do more and more things with fewer and fewer people, and it's having huge geopolitical consequences, but we've been so caught up with our recession that I think we've missed something pretty big.
Yeah, but I'll be damned if he can tell us what we've missed, because I don't know what he's talking about.
Did any of that make any sense to any of you?
Well, it's affecting productivity.
And we see that.
I mean, it's driving productivity higher and higher levels.
Companies able to do more and more things with fewer and fewer people, and it's having a huge geopolitical consequence out there.
But we've been so caught up with our recession, I think we've missed something pretty big.
So uh this is kind of along the lines of the AP story we had yesterday.
Stop whining and realize the world's better off than it ever been.
Just stop whining.
Oh, there's a story I can't wait to get to this one.
Somebody from the Obama administration, they're they're in court answering charges on the uh the mandate to buy health insurance.
And a guy from the regime actually says, Look, if if if you have a problem with it, just don't earn a lot of money.
There is a level at which if you don't exceed that in earnings, then you'd aren't you aren't affected by it.
So if you don't like the mandate, just don't earn a lot of money.
I'm not kidding.
That's the regime's answer to this.
In court, yeah.
There's a there's an easy way around the mandate.
Stay poor.
Because at a certain level of income, you don't have to buy it.
We we exempt you.
Now Thomas L. Friedman lives in a multimillion dollar Mansion in a wealthy Washington suburb, it's actually in Maryland, while he preaches green socialist policies and celebrates the tyranny of the Chicoms.
And he married his wealth, which is fine.
I'm just passing along information to you.
Working at the New York Times is great, but you don't buy mansions with what they pay you.
When did John Kerry wrote?
Yeah.
So I think Friedman got it on the first shot.
Carrie, you know, took two or three stabs at it.
And didn't Carrie, didn't he, he I think he did try to open his own lollipop store or something, or ice cream store at some point.
Didn't he?
Somewhere in Boston?
It was, I don't know, some reason lollipops sticks in my mind.
So Friedman's got it made.
Uh, but he still preaches austerity everybody else.
And the point is, we're too obsessed with our recession.
We're just too obsessed with ourselves.
We're too obsessed.
We're just we're we're spending too much time whining, because there is no recession for Thomas L. Friedman.
He's not really participating in it.
But all the rest of you, you're wasting too much time on it.
You're obsessed with, and you're missing all these important geopolitical shifts taking place out there.
So the other co-host on this show, Joe Kernan said to Thomas L. Friedman, well, you saw, you saw the media and political reaction to Benjamin Netanyahu, the president and his proposal for the 67 border, the lines, so when Netanyahu was here, bipartisan supporters of Israel reacted vehemently to Obama's proposals.
And I've seen some of your columns about Mubarak and the similarities of Netanyahu.
Are we wrong if we support Israel to take Netanyahu's side on this?
Uh are we wrong?
Mr. Friedman, are we are we are we wrong to support Netanyahu?
What is the greatest threat to Israel today?
I believe that it no longer is a Jewish democracy.
There are 300,000 Jewish settlers in the West Bank, another 200,000 in East Jerusalem.
There are 2.4 million Palestinians.
So for me, as a Jew as a supporter of Israel, the worst thing in the world would be Israel permanently controls the West Bank.
And basically, because of demographics, in a very short time, you'll have a Jewish minority ruling over an Arab majority.
Look, Netanyahu can get a standing ovation in the U.S. Congress if he reads the DC phone book.
Just like the Palestinians can get a standing ovation of the U.N. if they read the New York phone book.
So the question I'd ask Netanyahu is what kind of ovation do you think you'd get speaking at the University of Minnesota, the University of California?
That's what really matters to me.
Unbelievable.
Netanyahu, standing oh, U.S. Congress, Thomas L. Friedman, not impressed.
Now, to prove it to Thomas L. Friedman, Netanyahu should go to University of California, University of Minnesota, see what he gets there.
That's what really matters to Thomas L. Friedman.
What would happen to the and here's Friedman?
You know, you've heard the term self-loathing.
It just isn't right.
This isn't right.
2.4 million Palestinians and 300,000 Jewish settlers, we're the minority.
We shouldn't be running anything.
That does that make me very nervous.
No assessment of good guys, bad guys or any of that.
Just utter blather.
Pure pap, folks.
I have a little bit of an analogy for you based on Thomas L. Friedman and his uh his guilt.
That is driving him to say ridiculous things about Israel.
I'm told, folks, in about 75 years, we will have a Mexican majority in our country.
Seventy-five years.
So why don't we just cut a deal right now with Mexico?
I mean, they make claims on Texas, California, New Mexico, and Arizona.
Why just give it to them?
Because in 75 years they're going to be the majority anyway.
You see the stories about demographics in this country where we're headed.
Replacement birth levels aren't what they are, immigration, Any number of things causing these demographic changes to take place.
And what we can do, we can start instead of Arizona, we'll just call it Occupied Territory No.
One, Texas Occupied Territory Number Two, New Mexico Occupied Territory No.
Three, California Occupied Territory No.
And so on.
And we can call our citizens in Arizona, California, New Mexico, and so forth, Texas.
We'll call them settlers.
And we'll just turn these places over to Mexico.
Because Mexico is going to be the majority in our country in 75 years anyway.
So why don't we just realize where we're headed and be done with it?
That's what Thomas L. Friedman is suggesting happens in Israel.
The Jews are Trump, change 200, 300,000 settlers on the West Bank.
It's not fair.
It's not fair.
Thomas Friedman.
You see, my friends, typical ruling class does not have to live the life that he demands others live, like the Jews on the West Bank of Israel, or like the people of China who have to live under the Chicom dictators.
He doesn't have to live like the way he advocates everybody else.
His mansion is protected by our belief in property rights.
There aren't any terrorists or others making claim to Thomas Friedman's wealth or his property.
Nobody telling Thomas Friedman how to live.
But this is the arrogance and the conceit and ignorance of the left epitomized by Friedman because he smarter and better than everybody else telling everybody else how they should leave.
What I say counts.
He's out there doing it again.
Very, very uncomfortable having to characterize what Obama's doing.
He's out there seeing all three American automobile manufacturers are turning a profit.
Thank you.
They aren't.
It's like the AP has a fact check story today on Mitt Romney.
And Romney, yesterday in his speech, said that Obama is running around, has run on apologizing for America.
And AP says no, Obama has not ever apologized for America.
Now if AP is going to assert something that's that inarguable, why even talk about the AP?
Of course Obama has apologized for the United States repeatedly, prior to being immaculated and since being immaculated.
And now all three U.S. automobile manufacturers are turning a profit.
The taxpayers aren't gonna get back what they gave General Motors.
There's no profit at these places.
Ford, which did not get a bailout from the regime...
But he's out there just just to saying this stuff.
I mean, there's an AP story from the other day, uh, government to lose 14 billion dollars of auto bailout funds.
Yes, hey, today's AP has it, yeah.
The uh Obama regime said Wednesday that the government will lose about 14 billion dollars in taxpayer money from the bailout of the U.S. auto industry.
And he's out there telling these uh schlubs in the audience that they're everything's hunky dory here and they're turning a profit.
It doesn't look like that big a crowd.
I uh I just now started paying attention to this.
Uh in duress, by the way.
You know, it's Friday.
I never phone it in here, but there are liberties I do take on Friday, and I try not to watch as much of the gunk that's on the cable news channels during the busy broadcast day.
All right, back to the phones because it is open line Friday.
And this is Eric in uh in Wilmington, Delaware.
Thank you for waving, sir.
Appreciate your patience.
Hi.
Thank you for taking my call, um, 1995 Mac user back in the bad days.
Yeah.
But I'm still Mac the great machine.
But anyway, um, another thing, um uh uh president pick is JC Watts.
But that I'll get to my point now.
Um I'm just calling about a lady named um Brooksley Bourne.
She was the com uh commodity futures trading commission person during the Clinton administration, and she warned against the derivatives.
Oh yeah.
And she was shut down by Greenspan, Summers, and um other in Rubin, so they couldn't regulate them.
So um and then um which caused the financial help cause the financial crisis that we have now.
And these same people today are telling us things are getting better.
It's nothing but capital crony capitalism.
Yeah.
Well, there are, as is the case in every economic cycle, good and bad, there are people who do well while others aren't, and vice versa.
But you're right.
The uh a a lot of a lot of uh corporate entities doing well are doing well because of crony capitalism.
They're in bed with Obama, he's helping them out, they're getting health care waivers or what have you, any any number of things to help shield them from uh other market forces so forth.
But the entire the entire financial services industry, uh, you could say at one time or another in the past three to four years has been part of this crony capitalism.
I mean, what is QE three?
What is QE2?
What is quantitative easing?
It was just printing of money funneled uh in such a way that a lot of it was used to buy stock.
Ergo, the stock market looks healthy, stays good.
People that are invested in it make out like man, it's and I and QE2, the printing of money is it's either has expired or is about too soon.
And you saw Wall Street on Monday or Tuesday it was just a 240 point drop.
abject panic set in and they started calling for a new round of quantitative easing.
There's artificially being propped up.
And if you're in the market, that's good for you.
You'll take it.
It's how crony capitalism works.
It's how you get people to throw away their ideological beliefs.
It's how you get people to throw away their principles.
You promise to take care of them financially, corporately take care of them financially, and you own them.
And that's that's how Obama got a lot of his health care bill passed.
The insurance companies involved in it, some of the medical associations and so forth.
So derivatives, same thing.
It's uh it is the kind of stuff when people learn about it that they throw their hands and say, Well, what this I can't stop any of this.
You know, this is the kind of stuff Russia can say well, liberalism, conservatism, principles, that doesn't none of that matters in this stuff.
When you have a president who's gonna allow certain people literally reach into the Federal Treasury and grab whatever they want from it.
Then, you know, don't don't tell me about big government tea parties and all that doesn't matter.
Because it's still money that everybody wants and everybody focuses on, especially those that tell you that it isn't the money.
Uh May in Parkersburg, West Virginia.
I great to have you on open line Friday.
Hi.
Hi, thank you for taking my call.
The reason I've called is because I feel that if put in proper hand, and like I say, and proper hands, I believe that the United States can get out of debt by one way.
And it sounds stupid that maybe to a lot of people, but if they think about it, it would work.
I believe that the United States ought to have a U.S. lottery.
The all the states that have lotteries have a lot of income coming into their states.
I cannot understand why if they have that kind of income coming into the States that the United States couldn't have that coming in to the United States.
It would also create a lot of jobs.
Really?
Well, a federal lottery would create a lot of jobs.
Let me ask you a question here, May.
Okay.
Because you've cited a lot of these states uh with their lotteries.
They've got all this money coming in.
Right.
So all these states are really sitting pretty, right?
Financially all running surpluses and they're not in any trouble at all.
No.
Like I said, it has to be put in the right hands.
I am telling you, I don't feel that these states have and I'm from West Virginia.
Yes, we do have the state lottery here.
And that we are obviously one of the poorest states in the un in the Union.
Yeah, but May the the point is you could have fifteen lotteries in every state, and they're still going to be in debt.
They're gonna still spend ten times more than they take in wherever they get it.
A lottery is uh is is is not the answer.
And a lottery is not going to create economic growth, and it's not going to be sustaining, it's not going to be long term, it's not it it that's that's that's not a solution to the problem.
Uh that's in any way, shape, manner, or form.
In fact, we are every day's a lottery with this guy running the country anyway.
But government's always going to spend more than it takes in, no matter what it takes in, and no matter where it gets it.
You you institute a lottery and the belief, oh, this is gonna solve all of our problems.
By the way, every state lottery I've ever heard of was created so that we could make education whole, so that we could save education in every state.
That's all we need to do, lottery, and that's how we'll fix our education problems.
And still to this day, whenever I hear a government entity complain or whine, federal or state, it's always about education.
We simply don't.
We're not properly funding the children.
We're just not spending enough on education.
If these lotteries were to accomplish what they uh are are sold as being able to accomplish, there wouldn't be a deficit in any state.
We'd be running surpluses uh out the Wazoo.
Sorry to disagree with you out there, May, but uh stick with Powerball.
There's uh James in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
Uh, welcome to the EIB network.
Hello.
Hello, thank you for taking my call, Russ, and a nice long listener.
And that's like to say for Obama's election.
I got a phone call about a possible job opportunity.
And then after they said, We need to see who wins the election.
And then bottom one, like they're off in person, well, you know, like they're not hired now.
And I'm one of those chronically unemployed persons who aren't counted in the current unemployment numbers, but they're making progress, and there are no stimulus jobs.
I can tell you that factually.
No, not unless you're in a union, not unless you're in a public sector union.
Uh and there never were going to be any private sector jobs with the with the stimulus.
Let me ask you a question, James, because you're on a cell phone.
I have a devil of a time comprehending what people say on the cell phone.
Did you say that you got a phone call about a possible job opportunity?
Yes.
And they said that the opportunity won't really exist until after they say uh see who wins the election.
Yes, that's correct.
It's a year and a half away, James.
So that was the two thousand eight election.
Oh, two thousand and eight.
Oh, okay.
Yes.
Well, that's still the case.
It's still the case.
People are not hiring.
Open line Friday, Rush Limbaugh, the cutting edge of societal evolution.
Robert in Oakland, great to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Thank you very much, Mr. Lumbox.
Uh, pleasure to talk to you, Megadinos.
Thank you, sir.
Um my comment is about the global implications of the internet that Friedman talked about.
Uh he said that um productivity, of course, is dramatically increased with business and services and all that, which I agree, but I I think he was probably also right that we've missed the global implications of the Internet because the American exceptionalism that like won World War II or executed the Berlin Airlift,
uh Marshall Plan and all that has been somewhat blotted out by Obama's apologetic tripsies taken around the world while the North Koreans and the Arab Middle East countries have actually used the internet to control the oppression of their people, if nothing else.
Oh, while we've met probably such things as Radio Free Europe or Care, which I get passed, you know, displies with the American flag.
So it seems who says the White House web page is still bowing to Chavez or TLO and El Girl is getting more global currency than we are because we don't use the Internet.
We're reluctant to use it to use um uh for the propaganda freedom.
I mean, and in that case, Freeman may be correct about something that we're missing, that they're not.
Using it against us.
Uh I'm having a real tough time understanding you because you're on a cell phone.
It's not your problem, it's mine.
Are you are you saying that other countries are creatively properly using the internet and we aren't?
Right.
That as a country, we're not using it, but as a country, the North Koreans and the Middle Easterners are using it, and to great effect.
Which again is like how so wait uh uh tell me North Korea is using the internet productively how?
Oh, not productively as far as industry is concerned, but in controlling their social environment.
You want I heard you want the federal government to control our social environment with the internet?
Absolutely not.
But to advertise us, the beacon of freedom to the rest of the world as a country.
Oh, and the Middle Eastern area.
We are not using our internet effectively as a propaganda tool.
Exactly, for freedom.
Ah, I got you.
We instead use it on the White House to let the PLO know that we're just as bad as they say we are.
There's uh Well, does this not sort of make sense given who's running our country right now?
Absolutely.
Well, you got a guy, you have a president who's running around apologizing for the country.
Uh you have a president with a chip on his shoulder about this country and its illegitimacy as a superpower.
Does it sort of stand a reason therefore that this guy would not want to start using the internet to sing your version of the praises of America?
Because he doesn't see it that way.
Absolutely.
I agree 100%, and I think Friedman almost agreed and just didn't realize it when he said we were missing something.
I think that's what we're missing.
Well, except Friedman admires the wrong people.
Exactly.
Do you want to live like the Chinese live?
Not in a minute.
Of course not.
Do you want to uh does any there's there's no way.
I mean if Friedman extols the virtues of China, but I don't see him moving there.
You know it's it's these these people are too smart by half.
You know, Thomas Friedman is never ever going to have the kind of control over his life that he advocates over everybody else's life.
Because he's he's a classic uh uh elitist in this sense.
He is above being controlled, he doesn't need to be.
He's smart enough to do the right thing on his own.
But the rest of you, hoy polloi, great unwashed, you you you don't know enough.
It's the same it's it's the same arrogant condescension that the Democrat Party looks at its same it's its very constituents too stupid, too uneducated, too unsophisticated to understand how to get through each and every day, making the right decisions, not just for yourselves, but for the state.
Now this this whole bit when you Friedman talks about uh missing the global implications of the internet.
That we miss the global what does that mean?
Does we mean the government?
The the point is that if if you free up people from having to work so hard to pay their taxes, or to make ends meet by encouraging wealth creation and innovation, which will result from free enterprise, then this we stuff, which means government managed and directed objectives is meaningless and it isn't necessary.
But you have these guys like Freeman, Friedman and and and Obama, frankly, and others who look over the great unwashed and they see total incompetence.
You can't get across the street without them setting up a mechanism for you to do it safely.
Consequently, you're not capable of entrepreneurism.
You're not capable of making proper decisions.
So they have to manage it for you.
You can't manage them.
Oh no.
They are not going to be subjugated.
They're not going to be subordinated to your to their own rules.
They're going to be way, way above them.
Friedman, he Friedman talks all the time, and he is illustrative in this, as if we have some kind of all-knowing dictatorship in this country.
If we would, if if we would have this, if we would only do that, if we can only like incorporate some of the wonderful things about the ChICOMs with the right people making the decisions.
Why, then we can create new technologies and great innovations and products and services, and we could be a great country again if to the right few number cabal of people were running the show.
That's what this all means.
You know, to hell with them.
This country wouldn't last a week with these people in charge of it.
Sarah Palin continues to drive the media nuts.
The latest is the politico.
It is hilarious what she has done to the media.
It's just this is great.
I have the details for you and other exciting stuff in our remaining hour.
▲
Export Selection