All Episodes
Previous Next
May 17, 2011 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:55
May 17, 2011, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Man, I'm watching this stuff they're doing in the Mississippi River.
And I grew up on the Mississippi River.
They're opening all of these spillways, which are designed to flood small little towns and farms in the hope of saving bigger cities.
Man, what a tough call that's got to be for these engineers.
Up near where I'm from, Cape Girardo, there's a little town across the river and down south a bit called Cairo, Illinois.
Now, Cairo, Illinois, when I was growing up in the 60s, was the site of pretty bad race riots and stuff.
I remember I worked at, I was working in radio.
This was my second year in 1968.
And a bunch of network television and radio journalists were in town to report what was going on in Cairo.
It was burning the town, fires.
And they would come use our radio station to file their stories.
And I got to meet some of these network people.
And I don't remember much about it.
I was so focused on playing the next hit that these guys are kind of getting in the way.
But it was still a learning opportunity.
I don't remember the names.
I can't remember the names of people that showed up.
But I did pick their brains on a number of things.
I do remember how much they hated management.
It seemed to be a matter of rote.
Wherever I went in broadcasting, people hated management.
These people were sharing, don't think the network's such a great place.
You know, here I am.
I'm 17 years old.
I don't think it's such a great place.
And they're unloading on me about things about the job they don't like and how they're just numbers and they're a dime a dozen to their employers and this kind of thing.
It was fascinating.
Anyway, one of these towns that they thought they had to save was Cairo, Illinois.
So they flooded a bunch of farms on the Missouri side, opening a spillway.
And they're doing the same thing in Louisiana.
Waters are not rising as fast as they thought, but they're still opening these spillways and purposely flooding.
Okay, we know somebody's going to get flooded and have their life destroyed.
Who is it?
And they're always deciding on small gets destroyed.
It seems, seems to me, I wouldn't want to be the one making the call.
Great to have you here, folks.
El Rushbow behind a golden EIB microphone.
Telephone number if you want to join us, 800-282-2882.
And the email address, LRushbow at EIBNet.com.
I want to, a couple of soundbites here.
I mentioned last hour talking about this IMF guy that is accused of rape, no bail over at Rikers Island, and nobody's talking about the fact that this guy is a socialist elite.
This is the ruling class of Europe.
And they are stunned that this kind of treatment is being handed down to this guy.
Well, Stuart Varney was on the Fox Business Network today.
He's got a program called Varney and Company.
And he said this about Dominique Strauss-Kahn.
He's a socialist.
This speaks volumes about the reality of socialism today.
It's all about elitism.
You see, they are so much smarter than us.
From the top down, they know what's best for us.
They know how to command society to be more fair.
Nonsense.
Socialism in Europe has delivered mass unemployment and bankruptcy.
It will do the same here if we let it.
What socialism does is maintain the status quo.
Capitalism upsets the apple card by rewarding individual talent.
Socialists today are often rich.
Dominic Strauss-Kahn stays in $3,000 a night hotel suites and owns lavish homes around the world.
He knows what's best for us.
Yeah, and he's not paying a dime of his own money for any of it.
I mean, we are the IMF, right?
We are the World Bank.
All of these guys live and siphon what we do.
And this hardcore socialist, note that this guy more than happy to stay in a $3,000 a night suite.
Spending other people's money.
A lot of it is American taxpayer money.
You know, at $3,000, we all almost could excuse the guy for thinking the maid was included.
But I don't know.
I just, the guy reminds me, I don't know, there's something about this Dominique Strauss-Kahn guy reminds me of Pepe LePue.
Everything about this guy reminds me of Pepe Le Pew.
Anyway, Pro Paul Ryan, yesterday, Economic Club of Chicago.
Brief little soundbite here.
To an alarming degree, the budget debate has degenerated into a game of green eyeshade arithmetic, with many in Washington, including the president, demanding that we trade ephemeral spending restraints for large permanent tax increases.
I call this the shared scarcity mentality.
The missing ingredient, of course, is economic growth.
Exactly right.
Exactly right.
You got the doomsayers here.
And the latest thing on the debt ceiling is now default deniers.
You heard this?
This is shameless from Politico.
They are the newest breed of government skeptics, the swelling ranks of Republicans who don't believe the regime when it says a failure to raise the debt limit will prove catastrophic, and they stand ready to make negotiations over raising the cap on debt as grueling as possible, leaving Treasury officials and Wall Street more nervous than ever that the country could suffer an unprecedented default with consequences no one can predict.
Well, hey, if nobody can predict the consequences, then how are the media, the rest of the Democrat Party, so certain they're going to be dire?
If you can't predict it, the suspicion, which once flourished only in the conservative outskirts of economic circles, has seeped into the mainstream in recent weeks, gaining broader acceptance among establishment Republicans, even as the regime issues increasingly dire warnings.
Now, by conservative outskirts of economic circles, the political means the right-wing's lunatic fringe.
And this, my friends, a prime example of the left's textbook propaganda technique.
This reporter is comparing Republicans who are questioning the need to raise the debt ceiling with Holocaust deniers.
There's actually a new term, just like deniers, global warming deniers, climate change deniers.
You know, connect them, relate them to the Holocaust deniers, now default deniers.
The conservatives on the outskirts of economic circles, who don't believe that default will lead to dire consequences, are now default deniers.
Why is there even a debt limit if it would be catastrophic if it were not raised whenever it suits Congress to raise it?
Were the legislators who originally enacted this back in 1917 when the nation was at war, were they also like Holocaust deniers in their refusal to see what havoc they were wreaking?
I mean, if you're going to establish a debt limit, you are by definition establishing a period where it can all fall apart if the limit is exceeded.
Were Obama and Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, almost every other Democrat in Congress acting like Holocaust deniers when they voted against raising a debt limit back in 2006?
Remember, Obama voted against.
They all campaigned.
They all ran against raising a debt limit because back in 2006, their campaign playbook mandated that Republicans be called irresponsible profligate spenders.
They were all suggesting we not raise the debt limit.
I don't recall one media person criticizing them, calling them debt deniers, default deniers.
I don't recall the media chastising them at all for this.
Okay, well, let me just say something, folks.
I.L. Rushbo, raise both hands.
I am the Mr. Big of the default deniers.
Today, I claim the mantle.
I proudly and honestly come to you today as the Mr. Big of the default deniers.
We will not default on anything.
And moreover, it is more likely that the country's credit worthiness would go up around the world since we would finally be doing something to address our out-of-control spending and indebtedness.
If we were not to raise the debt limit, we would be perceived around the world as serious for a change and responsible for a change.
Otherwise, we are headed for junk bond status.
And the only people who want that, junk bond status for U.S. debt rating, are the people who seek to fundamentally transform this country as it was founded.
Keeping the debt ceiling will just force the government to finally do some real spending cuts.
The argument here is for keeping the debt ceiling where it is and not raising it.
We have enough revenue coming in from taxes to service the debt.
That is why there will not be any default.
Even some in the regime, before this latest playbook was employed, as recently as last week or the week before, let it slip that we could go on with barely a ripple through August or October even without raising the debt limit.
The onus is on them.
This is the fourth or fifth time in four years, three years, that they have come to us, the American people, with this Armageddon apocalyptic crisis.
That if we don't act today, our lives as we know it are over.
Our country as we know it is over.
Our reputation as it's known is over.
The financial system of the world is over.
Everything's over unless we raise the debt limit.
And the truth is, not raising the debt limit is the single most intelligent, responsible thing we can do, particularly for Republicans who are seeking the White House on the basis of getting this out-of-control spending under control.
For Republicans who are telling us that they hear us on all of this debt and all the irresponsible spending, and it's time to start talking trillions instead of billions of real cuts, then why the hell would you raise the debt ceiling in the middle of all of that as an agenda?
You wouldn't.
You would keep the debt ceiling where it is and use that as a weapon to ensure against additional profligate, wasteful, irresponsible spending, which is what has been going on for way too long here.
And it does have a negative impact on the future of every American born, unborn, and not yet even conceived.
Now, the Politico, where this default denier story appears, Carrie Budolph Brown, the authorette, apparently, the Politico hasn't noticed that Europe and much of the world are slashing their budgets.
Apparently, there are a bunch of default deniers who have seen the light in Europe, who understand they can't go on as they were.
They have discovered that Keynesian economics doesn't work unless destruction is the objective.
And these European countries, by the way, look at Canada.
These people are coming out of their recessions a lot faster than we are.
Maybe we should call them fiscal responsibility deniers.
You people, the politico, you are fiscal responsibility deniers.
Mr. Geithner, you and the members of your regime who are lying to your teeth again about this apocalyptic nature of this, this Armageddon we face, we are not default deniers.
You are fiscal responsibility deniers.
Place down by 21 again, Paul Ryan.
He's exactly right.
We are mired in the whole concept of shared sacrifice.
No economic growth.
What ought to be on the table is discussions of shared prosperity.
Here again, Paul Ryan, the Economic Club of Chicago yesterday.
To an alarming degree, the budget debate has degenerated into a game of green eyeshade arithmetic.
With many in Washington, including the president, demanding that we trade ephemeral spending restraints for large permanent tax increases.
I call this the shared scarcity mentality.
The missing ingredient, of course, is economic growth.
There's a piece in the stack here, Bruce Bartlett, who used to be a fan of this program, and then something happened, and he's not a fan of this program.
He used to be an economist with ties to the Reagan administration.
Something happened.
I don't know what it was, but he's not anymore.
But he's got a piece in the New York Times, the economics section, explaining the science of everyday life.
He's run some numbers.
And essentially, to cover Social Security and Medicare obligations, really cover them.
Meaning every obligation is met.
Every taxpayer in this country would have to pay a 61% rate.
In other words, whatever amount you paid on your federal income tax return this year would need to be 61% more now and forever to pay all the Social Security and Medicare benefits that have been promised over and above the payroll tax and what it generates.
Now, this shouldn't come as a surprise.
This number exists in every federal budget as a potential future rate.
I've seen this rate as high as 78% in some budgets back in the 90s to cover future obligations.
This is where Ryan comes in.
This is why Ryan's Medicare proposal is important to cover every obligation on behalf of every recipient, every taxpayer, 61% more now and forever than what your total federal income tax was last year.
Now, what are the politics of that?
What's the likelihood that that's going to happen?
What Ryan is saying is this is what the regime is aiming at.
This is what they want.
Shared decline, shared sacrifice, the end of prosperity.
That is what Obama is all about and the Democrat Party.
That's why it's silly to, in any way, make a statement that undercuts what Ryan is trying to do.
Quick time, if you're a Republican.
Back with more right after this.
And to the phones we go.
Kicking off for the first time today at Edwards Air Force Base in California.
This is Reed.
Nice to have you with us, sir.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
I heard several occasions you mentioned Tora Bora and we turned it to 6,000 degrees.
And I was actually there for that.
You were there.
Well, I had been told, I'm getting in trouble for this, but I've been told that there were photos of bin Aladdin on horseback at Tora Bora 10 minutes prior to you turning the place.
Well, actually, I think they mixed up a couple of days.
We were there a couple of days prior to that when we were working with a cowboy grand fact that, as a matter of fact, had mentioned he'd seen what they thought was Osama leading troops.
And we were assigned to bomb them.
We had a weapons malfunction that kept us from putting the weapons on the target.
So I think that's the day that he escaped.
It was a couple of days later when they brought in the C-130 and dropped that fuel air explosive.
I think that's what you were referring to.
That's right.
And then we followed up.
There was three of us.
I'm a B-52 pilot.
And we followed up with three of us dropping Mark 82s, full loads of Mark 82s.
You fly the buff.
Yeah, I recently retired.
I'm up at Edwards now as a test pilot.
But that was back in, I think, early December.
And the reason I called was we used to have to fly up from where we were stationed in order to, as you know, Afghanistan is landlocked, and we'd have to fly through Pakistan to get to Afghanistan.
At what altitude are you flying the buff?
Oh, well, we would operate in the lower 40s and then sometimes around 45 or 10.
Do they have anything that could hit you from at that altitude?
Certainly not the Afghanis.
There was all sorts of talk of them climbing to the tops of those big mountains and taking pot shots at us with shoulder launch, but we didn't believe that.
The big issue, the reason I called was early on as we started to prosecute the war, we were one of the first units to respond after 9-11.
And shortly after that, when we started the war, we'd drive up what they called the driveway through Pakistan.
And it was an agreed route that the host country would have a fly up.
And it took us over a couple of the cities in South Pakistan.
Well, little bastards would bang away at us with triple A as we fly over the cities.
Wait, wait, wait, wait.
My time is dwindling.
Are you saying that the Pakistanis been firing on us for a while now?
Oh, yeah.
Yeah.
From the very beginning, they told us it was rogue elements in the military, but they shot at us with heavy triple-A over some of their southern towns until they had to change the driveway to avoid the situation.
Interesting, interesting.
All right, look, Reed.
I'm honored to have you in the audience.
I'm honored that you called.
Proves the ineffectiveness of the haughty John Kerry even more.
Okay, let's review my last caller, the buff driver.
It's what they call the B-52.
Pakistan has been shooting at our planes, flying over their country for years.
Nevertheless, we have given them $20 billion in aid over the last 10 years.
And people like the haughty John Kerry say we should give them more.
Now, this is the kind of stuff the average citizen sees, and just it makes it makes no sense.
This is what leads people to think that whatever they hear, whatever they hear report about something, is just all lies.
Pakistan, an ally shooting at us.
We give them money.
They turn around and use some of that money to shoot at us.
We're told, well, Russia, they got to play a double game there.
I mean, they got nukes.
They got to fend off the Taliban in their country.
They got to fend off Al-Qaeda.
Yeah, while they're obviously protecting Bin Laden.
St. Louis.
Hello, John.
Glad you waited.
You're next on the EIB network.
Hi.
Dudos from St. Louis, Rush.
Rushy.
Yeah, great to have you here.
I want to make a quick comment about Arnold Schwarzenegger, and if possible, a quick comment about Bachmann Palin.
Schwarzenegger, I cannot believe that men who have money do not have the brains to use a condom.
Wait a minute now.
What is having money got to do with the brains to use a condom?
That you could afford to buy one.
Oh, come on.
Anybody can afford a condom.
Rushy, I work at Walmart, and we have a beautiful display.
I have seen young women buying condoms.
That's my point.
They're sold at Walmart.
You don't need to be a rich guy to be able to afford a condom.
So, but your question had to do with how come rich guys like Schwarzenegger don't use condoms when they can easily afford them.
No excuse.
Well, of all things to be curious about in this episode.
Rushie?
Yep.
Rushy, I think Bachman Palin would be a dream ticket.
Yeah.
Have either one of them bought a condom at your Walmart.
Not mine, Rushie.
All right.
So the question: why didn't Schwarzenegger use a condom?
Isn't the answer to this obvious?
Edwards didn't use a condom either.
Obviously, he didn't use a condom.
Isn't the answer to that obvious?
I don't know.
I don't.
I don't understand the question.
No, I don't think I'm going to take the occasion here to educate people on why these guys don't use condoms, but I don't think it has any to do with whether or not they can afford them.
Obviously not if they are for sale at Walmart.
You know, before this is all said and done, you mark my words, before this is all said and done, the news media is going to end up being mad at the housekeeper for not getting an abortion.
If she'd have just got an abortion, we wouldn't be here today.
Schwarzenegger marriage would be happy as it could be.
On and on.
Carolyn in Fort Lauderdale.
Hi.
Welcome to the EIB Network.
Wonderful to have you with us.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
Wow.
Tremendous, tremendous honor.
I have a sad but funny story about Michelle Obama's healthy choices plan for kids.
Do you remember this, where they were going to send fresh fruit and vegetables to the kids in the school?
Yeah, I remember that.
So my sister-in-law teaches at a local elementary school down here, and she has been coming with these stories for the last year about the stuff that they get.
They're not giving these kids bananas and strawberries.
Last week, they gave them raw beets, raw beets.
They've given them raw tomatoes, raw asparagus.
And all of this stuff ends up, the teachers don't even hand it out anymore half the time.
They just throw it directly into the garbage.
So when they got the raw tomatoes, my sister-in-law went around to the teachers and collected the ones she didn't want.
She made like three months of spaghetti sauce with them because it just gets chucked into the garbage.
You got to be kidding me.
No, I'm not.
Your sister-in-law collected unused raw vegetables and turned it into three months of spaghetti sauce?
Well, I'm exaggerating the three months, but yeah, she went around like, because the teachers are throwing these tomatoes away.
The kids don't want to eat a raw tomato.
Who eats a raw tomato?
So she took them home and made spaghetti sauce.
Well, compliments of Michelle.
Yeah, I know.
This is lunaticville.
This is nuts.
Oh, don't get healthy food stuff.
I know there are food deserts, but Michelle Obama demanding this giving away healthy food stuff.
My God, you couple this with the revelation we had today that they're going to start awarding schools for how well they teach environmental behavior.
Education Department working on that.
These people, folks, I swear, the liberals, Democrats, this is ridiculous and absurd.
The ideas these people have.
Things that they think are serious and that matter.
Why not just take the kids out at recess and let them graze?
Like we do the cows for crying out loud.
Ron in Memphis.
Hello, sir.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Thank you, Rush.
How are you doing?
Very, very well, sir.
Thank you.
Great.
Yesterday, Obama was in Memphis speaking at an inner city school, a school that won a contest.
I had him speak at their commencement exercise.
Yeah, I remember that.
And for the most part, it was a good speech, you know, work hard, study guard, all that kind of stuff.
But then he had a quote that just stunned me.
He said, used to be that you didn't have to have an education.
If you were willing to work hard, you could go to a factory somewhere and get a job.
Those days are past in America.
I just, I was stunned.
It's like, are we not going to have any manufacturing anymore?
I know that they've tried to eliminate manufacturing in the United States, but is it officially over now, according to Obama?
Where are you getting that?
That's a direct quote from his speech yesterday to the school.
Wait a minute.
I must not be hearing you right.
How is getting an education equivalent to not having manufacturing jobs?
He said in the old days, you used to be able to go down.
If you didn't have an education and were willing to work hard, you could go to a factory and get a job.
He said now those days are over.
But now, wait just a second.
That's not entirely wrong.
I mean, depending on how far back you want to go the old days, but that's not entirely wrong.
There were things called apprenticeships where your schooling essentially was working at the feet of a master learning a trade.
That's not altogether untrue.
What confuses me here is that Obama usually, Obamas both usually tell people to forget about working and go to work in the government.
They generally say, don't go to corporate America.
Don't go get jobs.
Stay in the service industry.
Stay here in your little town and help other people.
That's what they normally say.
That's what they both said during the 2008 presidential campaign.
And Muchel particularly was in some Ohio town, and she was telling people there, don't aspire to go work for some big corporation.
Don't pursue the big money.
But it's not altogether untrue.
In the old days, if you didn't have an education, you could still get a job at a factory.
It didn't pay a whole lot, but it was true.
I don't know that that's what he was advocating.
I didn't hear the whole speech, so I don't really have the context entirely of what you're commenting on.
I really should have that in front of me to be better equipped to respond to what you're saying.
I appreciate the call.
A brief time out.
We'll be back after this.
Don't go away.
You're guiding light to times of trouble, confusion, murkiness, tumult, chaos, condom-free philandering, and even the good times.
Rush Limbaugh, 800-282-2882.
From the New York Times, members of the House are back home in their districts this week.
And in the case of some Republicans, protesters are along for the ride.
The Democrat Congressional Campaign Committee has 20 Republican-held congressional districts in its sites this week.
They're hitting voters with automated phone calls denouncing the House Republican plan to revamp Medicare.
They are arming those who want them with signs to prove.
In other words, what they're trying to do, Democrats are trying to recreate the genuine Tea Party town halls of two years ago.
Even of last year, actually, 2010.
They're trying to recreate town halls against Tea Party candidates, calling a Tea Party town hall summer.
And the media is helping to get the word out.
That is the point of this story.
A website sponsored by the campaign committee, Democrat Campaign Committee, lists town hall meetings scheduled to be held by Republicans, mostly freshmen, during this week.
The group encourages voters.
The Democrats are encouraging voters to show up, as many did during the Easter recess, to protest or ask pointed questions.
So the Democrats are trying to recreate what was total grassroots spontaneity.
It's how the Tea Party formed, entirely spontaneous.
And Democrats are trying to create it, make it look spontaneous, using a New York Times and other media to get the word out on where to go, what kind of signs to make, what to put on the signs, what kind of questions to ask.
And according to the Democrat Congressional Campaign Committee, the big question for the week, are Americans just waking up to the Medicare debate and therefore more prone to engage on both sides of the issue at town halls than during the spring recess?
Democrats are refusing to hold town halls.
They're afraid to answer legitimate questions about their plan to empower unelected bureaucrats to cut Medicare and endanger seniors' access to treatment.
The Democrats are not doing town halls.
They do not want Tea Party people showing up.
Instead, they are arming their soldiers, if you will, with ammunition to head out to Republican freshman town hall meetings.
And of course, state-controlled media cameras will be there.
And you will see on all the cable news broadcasts what will be said to be spontaneous eruptions of citizens, upset at Tea Party freshmen, upset at Republican members of Congress demanding explanations on Paul Ryan's Medicare plans.
Not genuine, not real.
That sentiment does not exist.
In fact, most of the polling data shows that people over the age of 55 support the Ryan plan in droves.
So once again, counter-truth, counter-reality, create something that doesn't exist, try to make it look real, put it on television as real for the express purpose of dispiriting those of you who watch these reports.
Make it look like the elections last November don't mean anything, that the public mood back then has already changed.
Trying to create the impression in your mind that now that the public has seen what that election has wrought, they don't want any part of it.
That's the whole purpose of this.
So just remember when you see video reports of these fake, phony, drummed up town halls, don't fall for it.
The whole point of this is to dispirit you and make you think the American people no longer think the way they did when they voted in November, no longer oppose Obama, no longer oppose profligate spending.
They don't care anymore.
They are for more spending.
They don't want any reforms to Medicare.
That's what's going on.
And the media are willing accomplices in this.
Modesto, California, next.
Hi, Len, you're on the Rush Limbaugh program.
Great to have you here.
Rush, glad to talk with you.
I've been listening to you for many, many years.
Thank you, sir.
Listen, on Nuke Ingridge, you know, they took the Ryan bill in the Senate and shelved it, you know, and I don't think they're going to get to it and discuss it in any way.
And there's a lot of things in that bill that's really, really, really good.
But if you listen to NBC and some of these other stations, they're cutting themselves pretty bad on disassembling Medicare.
And I think Nuke has just taken a bigger picture, a more micromanagement of it.
In other words, he's looking to get beyond just Republicans.
I think he's looking for independents and Democrats and everyone else, you know?
So I think he's taken a good stand on it.
Okay, that's another way of just articulating my theory that he's trying to take the moderate view.
He sees a niche opening there that the conservatives have that side lockdown on this.
He's seeking the approval of Democrats.
He's seeking the approval of moderates.
He's seeking the approval of the media.
He knows full well that the way you get the media on your side is to rip conservatives.
He's seen McCain pull that off.
Yeah, yeah.
But that's not how you win a Republican primary.
That just is not how you win a Republican.
Republican primary voters do not reward that.
That's true.
You know, you're right there.
No.
You're right there.
So then what's Newt actually doing?
If he knows that and you know that and I know that, what's he actually doing?
Well, I think there's more to come, you know what I'm saying?
But, you know, for a very smart man that he is, you know, I think he's out there, you know, with the right things that he's saying.
All right.
Well, we'll see.
We'll see.
And you also, Rush.
Well, you know, I'm just a guy on the radio here.
I have the luxury of merely theorizing and commenting on it.
I'm not running anything.
I mean, look, any number of ways to describe what Newt's doing here, playing to the bookers at MSNBC and CBS.
But my theory, again, if you missed it, too bad.
But it really depends on Newt expecting not to win this.
If he really is in this to win, and my theory is full of it.
My theory is irrelevant.
My theory is based on the fact that I believe Newt looks at it and says he can't win, but he wants big things as a result of trying.
I'll tell you what I'm going to do.
I mentioned that one of the things he might be, and of course this is all theoretical, that one of the things he might be angling for is a full-time position on the board at the Aspen Institute.
I mean, everybody likes to go to Aspen.
They have a lot of intellectual meetings, conversations out there, seminars and stuff.
He's spoken, in fact, at the Aspen Institute.
It's run by Walter Isaacson, who used to run Time magazine and CNN.
And one of the speeches he gave Aspen, he called the war in Iraq silly.
I'll go back.
I'll get the text of it, share with you some excerpts of what he said during that speech at the Aspen Institute, because it all fits in with my theory.
I got to take a break, however, right now.
We'll do that and be back before you know it.
Don't go away.
Another exciting hour of broadcast excellence in the can.
Apparently, a lot of emails, I misunderstood this caller from Memphis about education and manufacturing jobs.
And if I did, it's simply because I didn't hear the guy.
It was a bad phone line.
And if I misunderstood, it's simply because of my being deaf.
Let me review it here.
We'll talk about it.
We come back.
▲
Export Selection