All Episodes
Previous Next
March 30, 2011 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:53
March 30, 2011, Wednesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
You know what I just heard the guy saying?
I just heard President Obama speaking before a bunch of kids again.
I wish he'd start making speeches to adults.
He goes out there and says, yeah, we can't drill, baby, drill.
And these stupid kids go, yay, yay.
He's out there trashing the whole notion of drill, baby, drill.
He said, ladies and gentlemen, that, well, I mean, there's no quick fixes in our energy problem.
No quick fixes.
If every president's promise to get rid of our dependence on foreign oil, there are no quick fixes.
And he starts making fun of Drill, Baby Drill.
He starts talking about how we're importing less oil since he assumed office than anytime ever before.
And I got to thinking, no quick fix.
Well, that's probably true.
But if we'd have started increasing our domestic drilling 30 years ago when everybody was calling for it, would we be in this situation today?
How long are we going to keep saying no quick fix when if we would have started on a quick fix 30 years ago, we'd be the solution by now?
Hiya, folks.
How are you?
Rush Limbaugh.
This is the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
I'm in one of those days.
I'm not going to have much patience for lack of logic, stupidity, and other things.
Drill, baby, drill.
It's exactly what we need to do.
And we should have been doing it for decades.
How long are we going to sit here and say, well, quick fixes aren't going to work?
We have an anti-American growth president.
This guy, Obama, in his speech today at Georgetown, speaking to the students, we'll have soundbites coming up.
The same emotions I had during the campaign.
The campaign is back.
It's just in full swing.
Whoever was writing the campaign stuff for the teleprompter is back.
You wait.
You'll hear it.
We'll have soundbites of this speech.
It's as though he hasn't been president yet other than when he talks about his great accomplishments.
It's about all the failures that have happened before he got here.
It's about all the miraculous, messianic things he's going to be able to fix.
But have you seen the latest polling data, Quinnifiak, number of polling data, a lot of polls, put it that way?
Americans have grown increasingly less likely to view Obama as a strong and decisive leader since he took office.
Roughly half now believe that that aptly describes him.
60% a year ago, 73% in April of 2009.
Strong leader.
He's plumbing.
How is this possible?
Everybody saw this great, strong leadership in the Libya speech.
You know, that speech was so strong.
It was so profound.
I hold here, ladies and gentlemen, in my formerly nicotine-stained fingers, today's column in the New York Times by Thomas W. Friedman.
Thomas L. Thomas L. Friedman.
Can I read to you the last line of this speech?
This is this it's hilarious, but that doesn't do it justice.
Dear Lord, please make President Obama lucky.
That's the last line of the lead foreign policy columnist in the New York Times today.
And it's all about, please get rid of Gaddafi.
Gaddafi has to go, please, God, make President Obama lucky, which is why, most of all, I hope President Obama is lucky.
I hope Gaddafi's regime collapses like a sandcastle, that the Libyan opposition turns out to be decent and united, and that they require just a bare minimum of international help to get on their feet.
Then U.S. prestige will be enhanced, and this humanitarian mission will both have saved lives and helped to lock another era.
Not even his staunchest allies are made comfortable and confident by what Obama's doing.
They are praying to God in the New York Times.
Do you understand, ladies and gentlemen, the depths to which they have plunged?
They are praying to God on the op-ed page of the New York Times, and they are praying for luck for Obama as though he has no control over the events.
Dear God, please let something good happen to him.
It's not very inspiring here.
We'll get into Qaddafi and Air Forces and NATO and so forth in a minute.
There are other things that I want to do here, folks.
We are loaded with things.
Even as the program started here, I'm trying to still organize what did I want to start with.
For example, UK Daily Mail online, it's about Trump, the birth certificate controversy.
You know, birth certificates are in the news, and Trump released a birth certificate.
The first one was not official.
So he had to release a second birth certificate.
Now, Mr. Trump's lawyer has defended Trump's New York origins by pointing out there are hospitals named after the Trumps in New York City.
The only things named after Obama are in Africa, according to Trump's lawyers.
The only things named after Obama.
Well, there was a school, but it closed.
I don't know that his brother's hut has a name.
So this is Trump's lawyers.
We've got Thomas L. Friedman in the New York Times on the op-ed page praying to God.
Praying to God for luck for Obama.
You know what the New York Times thinks of people who pray?
You know what the New York Times thinks of people who believe publicly, happily, proudly in God?
And now the New York Times is asking, folks, what else is there left to say on this program today?
Now we've got budget battles.
We got the budget.
We got Chuck Schumer out there saying, well, we've got the audio tapes of Schumer and advising everybody to call a Tea Party people extremists.
Frankly, folks, I want some extremists when it comes to budget cutting.
I'm sick of $5 billion a week here, $10 billion a week there.
Let's get some extremists when it starts dealing with this budget.
It's what we need.
There's also another way of looking at this.
But I thought of this.
How about asking the United Nations and the Arab League to tell Obama we got to get serious here about cutting our budget?
I mean, he listens to them.
He listens to the UN.
He listens to the Arab League.
If we were to somehow get those two guys, those two organizations, to call Obama, say, no, you really do need to get serious about your domestic budget.
You're not going to be able to do all these wonderful things for the rest of the world if you don't get your house in order in the United States.
We really think you ought to cut your budget, get rid of some of these entitlements, because they're listening to him, or he listens to them.
Maybe Boehner could dress up, well, you know, put one of those headdresses on and pretend to be a member of the Arab League At the next budget meeting, okay, Mr. President, we really look at anything that might lead this horse to water, folks.
Anything.
Let me take a brief time out.
Let me introduce the program, by the way.
800-282-2882 is the number.
If you want to be on the program, the email address lrushbow at EIBnet.com.
Also, we're going to do Open Line Friday on Wednesday today.
I will be out the next two days, ladies and gentlemen.
It's simply unavoidable.
You may recall that the City Council of Honolulu, Hawaii officially condemned me over my what they said was making fun of the Chikom premier, Hu Jintao, and the Chikom language.
And they issued an official proclamation denouncing me, criticizing me, throwing me overboard, demanding that I apologize and so forth.
So I'm going to go to Honolulu and surrender to the Honolulu City Council.
I'm going to tackle this head on right after my tea time at noon.
And we're back, Rush Limbaugh.
Open line Friday on Wednesday.
The President of the United States, in his energy speech today, trotted out some of the same old lines about there being so many oil leases sitting around unused.
The problem is not, we're not drilling enough.
He actually went out and he blamed the oil companies.
He blamed big oil.
Never mind.
And this is why I asked, when's he going to start speaking before adults?
It's easy to go out and say this kind of pablum in front of a bunch of college students who are caught up in the throes of idealism and have bought into this notion, have their young skull full of mush age, that oil is the great problem in the world, that oil is the great poison.
Here comes the savior, Mr. Obama, to save us all from it.
Never mind that not every oil lease pays out.
Sometimes there's no oil.
Or it would not be worth the cost to go get it.
Or it might be too unsafe.
Not every oil lease is guaranteed.
This is called risk.
It's called the free market.
It's called taking a chance.
It's called research and development.
You pay people to go out and find the best spots to drill based on the best information that you can get, but it doesn't always pan out.
Maybe a well has already run dry.
But as in all things, Obama pretends to know more about the oil business than the people who do it for a living.
Barack Obama could not get one drop of gasoline to the market if his life depended on it.
He doesn't know how it happens.
He doesn't have a respect for it.
He has a, you could hear it in his speech, this speech today, right out of the same attitude that that campaign took place and shortly after the immaculation.
There have been a bunch of different iterations of Obama.
This energy speech today was a campaign speech.
That's why it so irritated me because it reminded me of what everybody bought.
Hook, Line, and Zinker.
It reminded me of the game that was going on by the media to try to persuade everybody this guy was something unique and special when he's not.
And we're back to it again.
But we do have these polls.
It isn't working.
His approval numbers are plummeting.
He's like 41% or 44%, something like that in the Quinnipiac poll.
And of course, we're not hearing about that.
We don't hear about it.
In fact, I'm going to change my audio soundbite request on the fly.
Forget we'll do Schumer and stuff in the next half hour.
Go grab audio soundbite number two.
Who could forget this?
Wolf Blitzer, March 13th, 2006.
It's 4 p.m. here in Washington.
You're getting the first look right now at our brand new poll.
The president's job approval rating has taken a downward turn again, falling to only 36%.
This represents his lowest rating ever in the CNN USA Today, Gallipol.
The president's poll numbers are pretty bad, pretty awful right now, rock bottom as far as the CNN USA Today Gallipol.
The president's a rock problem and his new low point in the polls.
His approval and policies now are at new lows.
That's enough of that.
President's job approaches.
Number three standing by.
Soundbite number three.
So we remembered that went on and on and on all day.
That's all Wolf Blitzer could talk about.
It's all he could promote.
President Obama's approval rating and prospects for re-election have plunged to all-time lows in a Quinnipiac University poll released today.
Half of the registered voters surveyed for the poll think that the president does not deserve a second term in orifice.
41% say that he does.
In another Quinnipiac poll released just four weeks ago, 45% said the president did not deserve re-election.
The decline in support for a second Obama term comes as his approval rating has dropped four points since early March.
Now at 42%, that's a record low.
We are three points above the dreaded 30s.
And remember, we didn't even have to get to the 30s before we had the media doing fits like you just heard Wolf Blitzer doing when it was George W. Bush.
But now Nary a mention.
I mean, I've got a political story.
I'm actually reading from a political story that is two paragraphs about this.
No, I'm not complaining.
I'm illustrating it.
It's classic.
Here's Bloomberg.
President Obama's job approval reached its lowest level.
Nearly half of Americans surveyed opposed the U.S. military intervention in Libya.
This also, the Quinnipiac University poll.
50% of the registered voters surveyed by the Quinnipiac bunch said Obama did not deserve re-election in 2012.
So what are they talking about?
Let's go to the audio soundbites.
Carol Costello, who in the past has been assigned to stalk me as a reporter at CNN.
It's a little bit of her report on CNN this morning.
A new poll out that shows support for the Tea Party slipping away.
Maybe it's because of how a couple of Tea Party-backed governors are trying to balance their budgets and the kind of language they're using.
47% of all Americans have an unfavorable view of the Tea Party movement.
Wow.
Really?
You've got the president sitting at 42%.
Carol Costello and CNN can't seem to find that story.
But they come up with 47% of all Americans have an unfavorable view.
To me, that means a majority has a favorable view.
And she goes on to editorial as to why maybe it's because of how a couple of Tea Party-backed governors are trying to balance their budgets.
Ah, yes.
Well, Ms. Costello and the rest of you, let's just wait till November 2012, shall we?
You want to find out what the American people are really thinking?
That's a story in the stack today.
Tea Party, have they gone away?
Tea Party, have they faded away?
Tea Party, did they think it was over in November?
Tea Party hasn't gone anywhere.
The Tea Party's out there as passionate as ever.
The Tea Party's out there growing.
It's almost kind of good that the left might think the Tea Party's peaked on its way down.
Here's Dingy Harry this morning on the Senate floor.
Dingy Harry talking about John Boehner.
It's obvious that he's a difficult situation on his hands, and I don't envy him in that regard.
He's getting a lot of pressure from the Tea Party folks to dig in his heels, even if it hurts and destroys the recovery that we have going now.
What's worse, the country doesn't care much about the Tea Party.
There's a new CNN poll out today that says this very directly.
Really?
People who care about the Tea Party are a very small number who care about them positively.
Really?
Those that care about them negatively is very high, more than 50%.
Here you have Harry Reid.
Here is Harry Reid talking about the CNN poll on the Tea Party on the floor of the Senate, assuring everybody nobody likes the Tea Party anymore.
Nobody cares about the Tea Party.
And Boehner's got a big problem because he's getting a lot of pressure from the Tea Party folks, but nobody likes the Tea Party anymore.
Now, the Quinnope Act poll was taken before Obama delivered his Libya speech, just to keep the timeline here intact.
Don't know what the Quinnope Act poll would be if it had included the president's speech on Libya.
And we've looked everywhere.
We cannot find the raw data on CNN's poll about the Tea Party.
And we want to find that because we want to find out how they skewed it.
We want to find out how they sampled.
You want to go out and do a poll on the Tea Party, and if you want a negative result, you're going to have to oversample Democrats.
So we want to find out how many Democrats versus likely voters, registered voters, adults.
There's any number of ways that CNN could get this result.
But as you well know, polling is not a reflection of public opinion.
It is an attempt to shape it, especially as evidenced here by Dingy Harry taking the CNN poll to the floor of the House to try to pressure John Boehner.
All this talk of the government shutdown is coming up.
This coincides with Schumer, Senator Chuck Yug Schumer, and his claim that the strategy from deep in the bowels of the Democrat Party is to call the Tea Party and all these supporters extremists.
Well, we'll get into that.
Take a break here at the bottom of the hour, but let me ask you about this extreme business.
Maybe we need a little extremism here when it comes to budget cutting.
This $5 billion here or $6 billion there when the same day we spend or like I said, borrow $72 billion.
Does anybody think that the moderate way we're running around here dealing with this budget impasse is accomplishing anything?
It's not.
Extremism in the pursuit of liberty is no vice.
So saith Barry Goldwater.
I mean, I don't this notion of extremist, of course, that's, again, from a previous political era.
It's a page in the Democrat Party playbook.
They obviously think that extremist is a label that's going to categorize Republicans as social extremists or racists, sexists, bigots, homophobes.
But we are talking about the budget here.
The Tea Party, the Tea Party is about spending.
And if you want to talk about extreme, what is extreme is the irresponsibility of federal spending.
That's where the extreme is.
Extremism is on the spending side, and it's out of control and out of whack.
And we will be right back.
Sit tight.
Having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
Rush Limbaugh, your guiding light.
Our telephone number 800-282-2882.
Remember, open line Friday on Wednesday today.
Mark Stein will be in both Thursday and Friday of this week.
I've got to grab this call first.
We're going to get a Chuck Schumer and his claim that the Democrat claim we're all extremists.
Really, when you look at John Boehner and Mitch McConnell, do you see extremists?
What are they talking about?
It's the old playbook.
They're relying on things that they think have worked in the past.
And they are deathly afraid of this Tea Party business.
They just can't wait to take that fraudulent CNN poll, run to the Senate floor, talk about it.
But before we get back into all that, Madison, Wisconsin, one of our favorite places in the country, by the way.
And this is Mary Joe.
Mary Joe, hi, great to have you with us.
Hello.
I am a state worker in Wisconsin, in Madison, and I really want to know why you haven't brought up Governor Walker in the last few days.
You've been on Obama's case.
I'd really like to think of what you think of all the dirty politics going on with Governor Walker and how Senator Fitzgerald just got caught with his pants down there with union busting.
Mary Joe.
Yes.
I spoke about Governor Walker yesterday on this program.
I talked about...
Maybe I have limited time.
I listened to you on the way to work, so I apologize.
What is your view on what's going on now?
What is my view on?
What specifically do you want my view on?
Is Walker above the courts now?
If Walker doesn't have to answer to anyone, who's going to keep him in check?
I guess my reply to that would be, how does it feel?
How does it feel?
Well, because the federal judge has told Barack Obama his health care is unconstitutional, and Obama said you and is continuing to implement it.
I'm talking about that.
I'm talking about Wisconsin.
You have a rogue.
Well, it doesn't matter.
Wisconsin, the nation, it's the same thing.
You think you've got lawlessness on parade here.
You've got a rogue judge there, Mary Ann Sumi, who made a purely hack-flawed ruling on the open rule requirement not having been met and granting a temporary restraining order.
And the governor said there was nothing illegal about what we did, and I'm going to go ahead and publish.
I mean, the left constantly behaves in a lawless fashion above the accepted norms of what happens when you win or lose elections.
And now it's turned around on you, and you're looking to me.
Oh, no, it's not turned around.
Basically, yesterday in court, she said, you will not publish this lie or you're going to suffer the consequences.
He's already put it into a pup.
I know.
I called it this Farmer administration, and they already got everything going.
See, all of this is really not the issue to me.
The issue is workers' rights.
And the issue is the nation.
No, no.
The issue and every other person in the state of the United States.
Mary Joe.
Mary Jo, the issue to me is, I'd like to ask you a question.
Sure.
What is it that gives you the right to claim that your neighbors pay you twice as much as what they make?
Where do you get offering unless I could make twice as much money in the private sector?
Where do you get off as a public worker union demanding that your neighbors pay for your health care for the rest of your life and your pension for the rest of your life?
Where do you what kind of mindset is it that would make you look at your neighbors that way?
For one thing, I want to clear up one little item.
I am a union member.
I was never pro-union before this, to be honest with you.
The union didn't do a heck of a lot for me.
Well, I'm sorry for the assumption because you were very happy to report Governor Walker breaking the law.
Okay, so let me keep going with this.
But the issue to me is Governor Walker framed by my question.
Let me explain something to you that you probably don't know.
Governor Walker is attempting to save your state.
He is attempting to save your job.
You and your cohorts seem to not care about any of that.
All that you and your demands are is what matters to you.
And I just...
I don't have demands.
That's what I want to explain to you.
See, I can't...
In December of 2000...
I can't...
I can't relate to you because I've never asked somebody else to support me.
And to pay attention.
You seem perfectly comfortable asking your neighbors to support you at twice what they make.
We had already agreed on these raises with Governor Doyle.
Governor Walker.
I'm listening to everything you're saying.
You are trying to filibuster.
I am not going to be taken off subject.
The subject is not Governor Walker.
The subject is not the judge.
The subject is where did we get to in this country where certain citizens think it's the responsibility of other citizens to pay their way whatever they want health care pension at twice what the people paying them earn?
Where did we get there?
How did we get to this point?
Jack, your face is wrong.
I would like to say that.
I would be embarrassed if I were you.
I just want to know.
No, I don't think so because I've been offered work in the world.
I'm telling you I was making at least $10 more an hour and better medicines.
I'm sorry.
The reason I will only stay with the state is because I think I'm making a difference in my job.
Really?
I'm one of those people that I can help.
Hey, Mary Joe, Adolf Hitler made a difference.
What is this making a difference business?
What are you doing that's making a difference?
Okay.
Okay.
What gives governor or the Republicans, I guess, the right to tell me that I cannot collectively get together with people about my work, about anything.
Do you want the answer?
That's my right and because you are collectively bargaining against your citizens.
You are collectively bargaining against your neighbors.
You're not bargaining against some fat cat CEO flying around in a jet who owns the company.
The issue here is not about what you want.
The issue is about what is affordable, what the citizens are able to pay, and they aren't able to pay what you are demanding.
Collective bargaining.
You are not engaging in collective bargaining when you are a public employee union.
You're shaking down your fellow citizens is what's happening.
And the state's either going to go bankrupt or this is all going to get fixed and we're going to bring things back into balance.
That's where we are.
The governor is trying to save the state and save your job and everybody else's job.
You don't see it that way because you have the bias and the prejudice of union membership.
But, you know, who elected you to get health care for free?
Your pension.
Who elected you?
Who decided you get health care and your pension free for the rest of your life?
Where did that happen?
You know, this is this, it's unsustainable.
It can't go on.
Anyway, I got to take a brief time.
Mary Joe, I'm glad you called.
Set me up here.
We'll get to Chuck Yugoschumer when we get back.
Don't go away.
And we are back.
You notice the effort or the technique here.
Mary Joe from Madison.
They want these debates focused on Walker, in this case in Wisconsin.
Focus on the government.
What do you mean by the governor being lawless, Mr. Limboy?
I haven't heard you talking about that, which we did yesterday.
Or Boehner.
These unions, the left-wing Democrat groups are targeting us.
They're targeting you and me.
This has nothing to do in the end with Scott Walker and John Boehner or Mitch McConnell or Eric Cantor or Paul Ryan.
It has everything to do with us, folks.
It has to do with our lives.
It has to do with our taxes.
It has to do with our liberty and freedom.
It has to do with our country.
Mary Joe, you are our employee.
You are not our employer.
You work for the taxpayers.
One of your no doubt big heroes, FDR, was among many who said public union workers will not work.
Unionizing government workers will not work because they collectively bargain against the nation.
They are collectively bargaining against their fellow citizens.
Their fellow citizens become the enemy.
And FDR knew, Mary Joe, that as Democrats, they could not afford to make people angry at government because the Democrat Party was building itself, establishing itself as the party of government, the party that made people love government, the party that wanted people to look to government for every solution in life.
And it would not be productive if people started getting mad at the government.
And you're making that happen, or you are intensifying it.
These people are at war with us, not Scott Walker.
This is what you all have to understand here.
I don't care whether it's Wisconsin or anyplace else, Ohio, Indiana, wherever these public sector union battles, budget battles are taking place.
It is about our liberty.
It's about our freedom.
It's not about those people, these governors or any of the sort.
It is about us.
And they want it focused on these political people, politicians.
They want it focused on them because they think they can demonize them.
But what they are in truth doing is demonizing you and me.
That's ultimately who they are making demands of.
You and me.
Be it the federal workers or in the case of Wisconsin, be it the citizens there.
Okay, now let's see.
How long is the first Schumer bite?
I just a little technical glitch.
Let me do something real quick.
Connect this, do it this way.
My cochlear implant has disengaged from the magnet in my cranial cavity.
We're back.
Let's do it this way for now.
Let's go to audio soundbite number 19.
This is Chuck Schumer.
This happened yesterday.
We didn't have the audio for it, of course, before the program ended, but this was yesterday morning on a conference call with reporters.
Before the official start of the call, Senator Schumer was giving instructions to other Democrat senators, and he didn't know that the reporters were listening in.
And this is a little of what he had to say.
The Tea Party is pulling Boehner too far over to the right and so far over that they're not, there's no more fruitful negotiations.
And the subtext of this is the only way we can avoid a shutdown is for Boehner to come up with a reasonable compromise and not just listen to what the Tea Party wants because the Tea Party wants to stick to HR1 with its draconian extreme.
I always use the word extreme.
That's what the caucus instructed me to do the other week.
Extreme cuts and all these riders.
Boehner's in a box.
Boehner's in a box.
Tea Party's demanding this.
Tea Party's a bunch of extremists.
Again, see, it's us, folks.
They're at war with us.
The Tea Party is us.
The Tea Party is you and me.
Now, Schumer and his, they may want to focus on Boehner in this case, but it's us.
They're targeting you and me and our economic liberty.
I mean, it's going to cost us more to pay them, even more than many of us earn.
But Senator Schumer wants us to know.
I mean, the message of all this was that the Tea Party activists are extremists.
But, see, who are the Tea Party?
Who is the Tea Party?
A Tea Party is made up of taxpayers.
Tea Party is made up of people who work, the vaunted working people.
A Tea Party is made up of the citizenry of this country.
The Tea Party is comprised of producers, people who make things and make things happen.
A Tea Party is made up of contributors, the providers.
The Tea Party is the backbone of the country.
The Tea Party is not asking to live off other people.
The Tea Party is not making demands of the government.
The Tea Party is trying to get the government to live within its means.
The Tea Party is attempting to save the structure of this country so that economic freedom and opportunity continues to exist and increase and climb.
But now, all of us, the producers, the citizens, the taxpayers, we are the extremists.
See how this works?
Not the unions, not the ACLU, not the illegal alien support groups, not the moveon.orgs, the daily cause, the code pinks, and none of the true wacko kooks in our culture.
They are not the extremists.
They are the Democrat Party leftist constituency, but we, we the people, we are now denounced by the Democrat Party as extremists.
The Democrats, folks, speaking bluntly and speaking honestly, the Democrats have driven this nation to the brink of bankruptcy and instability.
They have leased our country out to the CHICOMs through massive debt.
They have destroyed Social Security and Medicare.
They are destroying the value of the U.S. dollar.
They are destroying the housing market.
For God's sakes, they're destroying everything.
And we, we have to hear we are the extremists.
We're trying to save.
We genuinely love this country the way it was founded.
We're trying to defend it and preserve it and save it.
We're the extremists.
Fine.
Then we need more of us.
The Democrat Party, Senator Schumer's party, has populated the federal courts with the most radical lawyers in the country.
They have encouraged this massive bureaucracy to rule over us through endless regulations, like this cap and trade from the EPA.
They've caused millions of people to lose their jobs, to lose their businesses, lose their investments.
But we are the extremists.
Take a look at what has happened since the Democrat Party took the reins of this country in total, starting first in 2007 with Pelosi in the House and then Barack Obama in 2009.
You take a look at what has happened.
And through most of those years, there's not one thing that could have been done to stop them in the Democrat fashion because we didn't have the votes.
The number of people living in homes is at an all-time low.
Home vacancies, foreclosures.
Nothing's right.
This is not how it was supposed to be.
The New York Times lead columnist is praying to God for luck for our dear president.
We are the extremists.
The greatest danger your kids and grandkids face today is not from bullies, it's from the Democrat Party.
They are spending so recklessly and so fast.
Your kids and grandkids are doing all they can and still will bear the brunt of this, the massive printing of paper, the massive debt that we owe ourselves, the massive debt we owe the Chikons, Schumer and his party spending the wealth of the next generation, the next generation, and will be working harder and harder and longer and longer to pay for all this.
Yet we are the extremists.
Sorry.
It's the other way around.
Really amazing.
Obama and Mrs. Clinton are suggesting now that we make it official, that we start arming the rebels in Libya.
They are suggesting that we arm al-Qaeda.
And yet, ladies and gentlemen, we, you and me, are the extremists.
We are arming al-Qaeda in Libya.
▲
Export Selection