All Episodes
Previous Next
March 16, 2011 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:40
March 16, 2011, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
I'm Rush Limbaugh, and this is the EIB Network.
It is the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
We have more fun than human beings should be allowed to have every day here.
Telephone number if you want to be on the program 800-282-2882.
And the email address, lrushbo at eibnet.com.
Yeah, I've got on MSNBC.
I thought about it.
I'm not going to say anything.
It was I who asked the question.
That's what you're thinking, right?
It was I who asked the question, do we actually want to sit here and watch this happen right before our very eyes?
That's what you're thinking, right?
And you're hoping I mention it again.
Here I am starting the program, and the staff on the other side of the glass says, hey, you see what we're seeing on MSNBC?
I know what they're trying to do here.
The funny thing about Mrs. Clinton is that she went over to Egypt and she met with the rebel leaders there and they basically told her to pound sand.
They did.
The rebel leaders in Egypt wanted, I mean, it was a pretty big diss, which I thought it's fascinating because remember our old buddy Nick Robertson.
Hey, Mustafa, what is your message of President Obama?
Obama.
He didn't care about us.
Okay, then.
Well, we'll go find Achmed.
Ahmed, what is your message of President Obama?
He didn't care about us.
He's been all over the board.
Nick Roberts.
Al, as you can clearly see, people in Egypt coming around to the idea of President Obama, very much supporting of their finding jobs and whatever.
They tried to put themselves in front of this whole movement, make it out to be about them.
And that's why when Hillary gets over there, starts meeting with these rebel leaders, she gets dissed.
I love it.
This country is a laughingstock.
This country used to be respected and some places feared.
Now we're viewed Trump's right.
I know some of you don't want to hear that name on this show, but about this, he's right.
We're looked at as a bunch of patsies.
And we can be played.
We are being played.
Now, what I was going to say is Fox News is reporting that all U.S. troops have been ordered to stay 50 miles away from the There's a typo here in this word.
Well, that's not a question, House, but I could pronounce it, but not the way that it is typoed here.
It is a good thing I am a broadcast professional.
Highly travelled.
The Fukushima plant, 50 miles away from the Fukushima plant.
And I'm guessing that the order to stay 50 miles away was given to the same surgeon general who says it's a good idea for all of us to stock up on iodide pills.
Iodide.
How many of you are going and asking for iodide?
Speaking of which, I have a news story here from the Standard newspaper in Bulgaria.
Our show prep has no boundaries.
Bulgarian scholars suggest red wine instead of iodine solutions to curb the effects of radiation.
This is the advice of Bulgarian scholars as a response to the panic stirred after the explosions in the Japanese nuclear plant of Fukushima.
Although the explosions in Japan happen at quite a distance from Bulgaria, thousands of Bulgarians stormed into drugstores to buy iodide, according to the U.S. Surgeon General supplements.
This is dangerous.
It could damage the thyroid glands, said the Bulgarian Ministry of Health.
Instead, red wine consumption is by far a more potent barrier to radiation because of its high tannin concentration.
This from Professor Danka Baikova, the deputy chair of the Bulgarian Nutrition Association.
Red wine is strong antioxidant and protects against foreign agents.
And it says here that Bulgarian wines are especially beneficial in such cases.
I think this is an ad for the Bulgarian wine business, but I'm happy to know they've got one.
I'm an onophile, and I had no idea that Bulgarian wines were such renowned onophile, wine aficionado.
Pronounced onophile.
Look it up.
James Taranto, our old buddy at the Wall Street Journal, Best of the Web, has a piece, The New York Times idea of a conservative is a guy who loves to puff Obama.
I remember distinctly an image of we were sitting on his couches.
I was looking at his pant leg and his perfectly creased pant, David Brooks told the New Republic two years ago, reminiscing about an encounter from 2005 when Obama was a newly elected U.S. Senator.
And Brooks said, I'm thinking, A, he's going to be president, and B, he'll be a very good one because of the crease in his pant.
Now, Ms. Taranto writes, we're told David Brooks is a very smart guy and intellectual.
Yet, this super genius is fixated on the superficial.
For example, can you imagine if Sarah Palin offered up a creased pants analysis of a candidate?
And this is David Brooks.
Here's what David Brooks said about Sarah Palin in November of 2009.
She's a joke.
I just can't take her seriously.
And the idea that this potential talk show host is considered seriously for the Republican nomination, believe me, it'll never happen.
Republican primary voters are just not going to elect talk show hosts.
Funny, but it's Sarah Palin, the Ditzy, amiable dunce that's fixated on substance.
She's got a piece, Facebook, the $4 per gallon gasoline president.
$4 per gallon gasoline president.
This is her submission on Facebook today.
It has nothing about somebody's crease in their pants.
And it is very substantive.
And there's a piece, a story here, USA Today by Chris Woodyard.
Study says $4 gas prices will drive millions to public transit.
Aha.
Aha.
USA Today reveals the secret.
The reason why Obama loves high gasoline prices.
He wants everybody, as do liberals on mass transit, better to control.
But beyond that, it's just mass transit is better.
That's how metropolises work.
Controlling people, managing people efficiently and so forth.
That's the best way to govern and so forth.
And the $4 a gas, $4 a gallon gas drive millions to public transit.
Ladies and gentlemen, I'm sure you were here yesterday.
Sturdy, by the way, I got an email from a guy who said, you know, you have open line Fridays.
What you ought to have are monologue only Wednesdays.
Because this guy thought the first hour of the show today was fabulous.
And he said, don't ruin it by taking any phone calls.
Do all monologue Wednesday.
Well, I'm not going to do that.
We will indeed take some phone calls.
I'm looking to the stack here.
I've got a bunch of upcoming stories on the beginnings of doubt that the press and some in the Democrat Party are having about Obama's leadership and lack of it.
I also, folks, I've seen this quote before.
I ran across it again last night.
You might have heard me mention this.
You might have heard this quote yourself.
Great minds discuss ideas.
Average minds discuss events.
Small minds discuss people.
You know who said it?
Eleanor Roosevelt, before she knew that Hillary Clinton was trying to channel her in seances.
Great minds discuss ideas.
Average minds discuss events.
Small minds discuss people.
And it reminded me what we were talking about yesterday, Sarah Palin and the Tea Party, the drive-by media in general.
The leftist punditry talks incessantly about people.
Small minds talk about people.
They talk about Michelle Bachman, me, Sarah Palin, Bush, Newt, you pick it, you name it, they talk about people for the express purpose of destroying them, impugning their character or what have you.
They do it in personal, gossipy, high school type ways and terms, but they do so in order to cut down, to embarrass and destroy the people they oppose, or the people who might be more popular than they are.
Don't discount that as a reason for jealousy, envy, dislike, or what have you.
The drive-bys are rabid in discussing events.
They turn every event into a pending doomsday scenario.
But what do we talk about on this program?
We talk about ideas on this program.
Policy, ideas, same thing.
We talk about events.
Of course, we talk about people, but in the context of ideas.
My interest in Obama is solely oriented around his ideas, his policies.
I am also fascinated about how his incompetence is excused by those who created this puff, false image of him.
And I am very entertained by watching and reading the attempts here to excuse his incompetence.
But still, we talk about ideas, events and people in the context of their ideas.
And then, after all of this, I asked myself, what's Obama talking about now?
What's Obama discussing?
The last two days, the big news about Obama has been bullies and basketball games and golf courses and dinner and jokes with his media buddies.
He doesn't even he's talking people.
He's talking events.
He doesn't talk about ideas.
They're beneath him, of course.
You see, yeah, we couldn't keep up with those ideas.
The ways of Obama are simply above us.
It is enough for us to be grateful to be in his presence.
But he doesn't discuss ideas.
He's caught up here discussing bullies, basketball games, golf scores, events, and this sort of thing.
Also, we've been talking about the divide in the Republican Party.
I pulled no punches yesterday.
I told you purely, plainly, and simply that if the truth be known, Republican leaders, Democrat leaders, when they get together, sit there and trade stories about the people in the media that bug them.
Like, I guarantee you, Republicans get together.
Damn limbo, damn Hannity demon.
We have to deal with it.
I guarantee the Democrats complain about whoever's on MSNBC.
We're just, you know, little obstacles in their way.
I'm under no illusion that this is how we're seen.
None whatsoever.
So here we have in the politico today: some in GOP grow tired of right-wing.
Now, keep in mind, none of these people in GOP would be in power if it weren't for the right-wing.
But, and it is politico, so we have to allow for some exaggeration.
But this story says some veteran Republican House members are pushing back against conservative deficit hawks who are pushing for endlessly deep spending cuts, saying the right wing of the party is creating unnecessary divisions for the Republican majority.
While the 54 Republicans who voted against the most recent stopgap spending bill didn't derail the legislation, some Republican lawmakers are becoming increasingly wary of a faction that rejects substantial spending cuts because they want deeper ones or the inclusion of divisive social policy writers.
Now, what's wrong with that paragraph?
Some Republican lawmakers are becoming increasingly wary of a faction that rejects substantial spending cuts, like what, $10 billion?
Is that substantial?
$6 billion?
Is that substantial?
Yeah, it's surprising, said Idaho Representative Mike Simpson, of the difficulty convincing hardliners that the leadership is cutting large amounts of spending.
I mean, this is three weeks.
We're cutting $6 billion.
You know, it's surprising.
This is the only time in my life where I can cut $6 billion in a three-week period and be called a liberal.
Ohio Representative Steve Lacherette, an appropriator close to John Boehner, said Republicans are seeing a constant tension between a Democrat Party that talks about cuts but doesn't want to cut anything.
And then you have my side that wants to cut anything at moves.
That creates this dynamic tension.
You have people in my party angry that we are not adding writers or shutting down the government, things like that.
But this is exactly what people expect us to do.
Find cuts and continue to talk, Lacherette said.
Other Republicans are quietly complaining that a few bombastic members of their conference who regularly appear on TV create an outsized perception of pressure.
At the center of the debate is the 87-strong freshman class.
Most of its members voted yes on the resolution, bucking the perception that they would be a rogue bloc opposing the GOP spending measure, but 22 freshmen voted no.
Very reasonable, they say.
In fact, many conservatives feel emboldened by the freshmen, even if they don't match up on votes.
Perhaps nothing illustrates the tension better than the dust-up between House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy, California, Indiana Representative Mike Pence during a closed-door House Republican conference meeting Tuesday morning when Pence announced he would vote against the bill.
McCarthy asked why he would vote for H.R. 1, but not the three-week measure under consideration.
Pence said the nation is adding $2 billion in debt every day.
McCarthy said, Preston wanting to know why Pence or how Pence was helping reduce the debt by voting against the bill.
How much are you cutting? McCarthy asked Pence.
So, as a great mind immersed in ideas, this is not a surprise to me.
In fact, something I foretold and predicted yesterday.
Some in GOP grow tired of right-wing.
What that means is: would you freshmen shut up about spending cuts?
Shut up about it.
We're not going to shut down the government.
So just be quiet.
That's what that means.
Let's grab some phone calls.
A caller said, Rush, I think you ought to do all monologue Wednesday since you're due Open Line Friday.
But we got a lot of people lined up and have been patiently waiting.
We'll start with Dorothy in Pauli's Island, South Carolina.
Glad to have you on the program.
Hello.
Thank you.
Rush, I need some more information about something you said.
I think it was yesterday.
Yes, ma'am.
About recycling.
I'm recycling, and I think I'm doing something wonderful.
And did you say that it was bogus?
Yeah.
What am I missing?
It doesn't save any money.
Costs just as much, and it doesn't make one bit of difference when it comes to pollution or not pollution.
Yeah, if it makes you feel good to do it, that's fine.
But it won't make me feel good if I don't think it's doing any good.
What have you been told?
What is the good that you believe it's doing?
Well, I think when I recycle my plastic, for instance, that other items are being made from it rather than new products, new petroleum products.
I don't know.
Maybe I'm just gullible.
Well, they may, in fact, be doing that, but it's not saving any money.
It's not changing the amount of usage of resources or anything.
And it's costing far more money, far, much more money than it saves.
It's also been learned that, I mean, after all, who picks up your recycling bins?
My husband still takes it to the recycling.
Okay, but there's somebody there that still has to shepherd it, make sure it doesn't get mixed in with all the other they have found in certain places.
I can't cite one off the top of my head here, but once you let's put it this way, the purity of PATH has not been guaranteed at every place there is a recycling center.
There's nothing to suggest that your plastic doesn't get mixed in with somebody else's non-plastic garbage somewhere down the road.
Oh, so I might as well do it myself.
I see.
Well, I'm not sure.
Oh my gosh, I feel like I've destroyed your day here.
I don't want to do that.
Because I guarantee you.
Now, Dorothy, I guarantee you, right this moment, there are people calling this show to tell me I don't know what I'm talking about.
I'm making it all up, which I'm not, but they're telling me I'm wrong.
So you keep your radio on because I'm sure there are going to be people who tell me that this, what I'm telling you isn't right.
But I wouldn't tell you otherwise.
I've got nothing for it or against it.
I'm just saying, I don't waste my time doing it.
We did.
One time, we had to.
In our house, we had all these different trash bins.
And I heard something somewhere.
We stopped it because it wasn't, I don't know, it was years ago.
We just stopped it.
Was it worth trouble, right?
Well, it wasn't trouble for me.
It just, it was, geez, Dorothy.
Well, I'm disappointed.
Let me put it that way.
You really wanted recycling to work?
Yeah, I would like for recycling to work.
Yes.
That's what I'm saying.
Well, stand by.
Okay.
May I ask you one more question?
Well, yeah, but I got a break here.
Can you hold on to the break?
Meanwhile, I'll find out more when we come back.
Okay, we're back, and we have Dorothy from Pauley's Island, South Carolina.
Dorothy, I'm really sorry.
I really feel like I've told you there's no tooth fairy.
And I don't want to hurt your feelings here.
But here's what I've been able to find during the break because I remember I used to live in New York City when it was affordable.
And I remember I was there when Giuliani was the mayor, and he said that they didn't separate everything at the time.
They didn't separate all the trash, that they couldn't.
And the break here, we found this.
In 2002, New York City, an early municipal recycling pioneer, found that its much-lauded program was losing money, so it eliminated glass and plastic recycling.
According to Mayor Michael Bloomberg, the benefits of recycling plastic and glass were outweighed by the price.
Recycling costs twice as much as disposal.
It costs twice as much as just making new plastic things.
So New York City just, they dumped it.
At our New York studios, which I haven't been in in four years, but our New York studios, they still have the recycling.
You've got glass, plastic, paper here.
And I just asked somebody, they all get dumped in the same giant can at the end of the day.
So the staff is doing the recycling, but at the end of the day, it all gets dumped in one big trash barrel.
Right.
Well, the thing I'm hoping, and I will look into it, is that in my little town, maybe it's different.
I'm sure it is.
Okay.
My other question, and I promise I won't take up any more time.
Not at all.
But while I have you, it's very difficult to get through to the show.
But why don't we hear more about, with all the talk about spending, why don't we hear more congressmen talk about cutting out money sent to other countries?
In my opinion, we should not send one thin dime outside the country.
Why don't I hear that?
Foreign affairs, the foreign aid budget.
You know what the foreign aid budget is every year?
It's really not a lot of money.
I do have a theory about it.
If I were president, we'd have a plan.
I have two lists.
I'd have the good list and the bad list.
And if you're a country saying good things about us and you support us, we'll help you.
But if you're trashing us, and if you're making fun of us, and if you're not appreciating us, you don't get diddly squat.
Well, that's certainly not.
You got the excrement list.
You've got the good list, the excrement list.
And once you're on the excrement list, you are on it for a minimum of five years.
It requires five years of perfect behavior of loving us, supporting us, appreciating us before you get the next dime from us.
I like that.
But it's like there are charities that I would love to send a lot of money to.
Smile Train, for instance, with the cleft pallet.
But if I don't have it, I can't send it.
And that's the position I think we're in now as a country.
We need to spend all our resources right here.
Well, two-thirds of our foreign aid goes to Israel and Egypt, and Hillary is in Egypt promising to send them even more now.
Oh, my.
Oh, yes.
Well, that's exactly her pocket.
That's fine, but I don't want it taken out of my pocket.
I agree with you.
I agree with you.
In fact, you know, when it talks to spending, we always, even now during these debates, we always hear, you can't cut that.
You can't cut that.
Well, how come nobody ever said at the beginning, you can't spend that?
It's the one thing we never say.
Can't spend that.
That's never part of the discipline.
Now I got to tell you something, folks.
This story here about the Republican leadership starting to complain to the media about the freshmen, let me tell you something.
It sounds like the freshman Republicans are at least the majority of them it sounds like they really are radicals after all, that they're going to insist on doing what they were sent there to do, that they're going to do what they think is best for the country.
They're going to insist on serious spending cuts.
And there's nothing more radical in Washington than insisting on serious spending cuts.
That's as radical as you can be.
It's as radical as you can get.
All right.
I'm sure there in South Carolina there's still recycling and that I'll check it with Lindsey Graham, but I'm confident that that program's still working there and working well.
Who's next?
Jeannie in Huntington, Long Island.
Welcome to the EIB Network.
Hi, Rush.
Mega Freebook.
Diro to you.
How are you?
Very much.
Thanks so much.
God bless you for being on the front line for us.
Without you, God knows where this country would be.
Well, you're very kind.
I appreciate that.
You deserve it.
But the reason why I'm calling is I'm hearing a lot about Barry being compared to, you know, being the second Jimmy Carter, which I think is completely wrong.
I think Jimmy Carter was just a simple, naive dealist who was clueless about his job.
On the other hand, Barry, the usurper, knows exactly what he's doing.
He is bringing America to its knees simply to destroy us.
I believe that is his ultimate plan, to destroy America.
The second term of Jimmy Carter talk, though, essentially means that.
If you missed Jimmy Carter's second term, here it is, regardless how it's happening, if it's happening via naivete and just being wrong or whether it's happening by design, it's still happening.
I think Jimmy, you know, he was just a little naive and clueless about his job.
But Barry, on the other hand, knows exactly what he's doing, and he's doing it on purpose.
And I think that's the difference.
Well, a lot of people share your point of view on that.
There's no question about it.
You know, Jimmy Carter, Jimmy Carter is one of these guys.
Ex-presidents have a, it's an informal, unwritten manual behavioral code.
They just sort of slink away.
Now, Clinton has abandoned the ex-president manual because he's still out chasing chicks.
And, you know, he's had the heart deal and you've got to cut him some slack.
Jimmy Carter is an entirely different thing.
Folks, I'm going to tell you something.
And you who have been members of this audience for a long time have heard this theory of mine.
If you're relatively new to the program, you haven't heard this.
Jimmy Carter is doing what he's doing today.
He's behaving as he is behaving in his post-presidency for one reason, and it's the Nixon funeral.
Now, let me set the stage for you.
Here's Richard Nixon.
As far as Jimmy Carter is concerned, the worst, most despised, despicable, rot-gut president ever.
All Democrats thought that until George W. Bush came along.
It was Nixon.
But then Nixon passed away.
And it was time for the Nixon funeral.
The Nixon funeral took place in California.
And the setting, I will never forget the setting.
The little house that Nixon grew up in was in every camera shot.
It's amazing what we all know what pictures can do, create image-wise.
There's that little house that Nixon grew up in.
And it was in every shot, so you never forgot it.
Humble beginnings, tiny, tiny little house.
Inside was the piano that Nixon played as a kid.
It's where he lived.
He was in love with his future wife, Pat, loved her so much that he drove his wife, Pat, when she had dates with other guys, just so he could be close to her.
He drove her with Pat and her date in the back seat.
He was the chauffeur.
Well, all of these stories are coming out, the Nixon funeral.
And then there was an endless parade of eulogists.
And this endless parade of eulogists was delivered on Air Force One with Bill Clinton at the helm.
They even had videotape of Air Force One arriving, flying over the funeral site.
And on board were people like Gerald Ford and Henry Kissinger.
Luminary after luminary after luminary.
Rinalda's Magnus was there.
He didn't speak, but he and Nancy Reagan were there.
And Clinton gets up and delivers one of the most beautiful eulogies ever of Richard Nixon.
And then Henry Kissinger got up, and they're praising him on China.
They're praising Nixon.
This could have brought Nixon back to life.
It was so unusual.
I mean, the kind of stuff Nixon longed for his whole life, they were finally saying.
Meanwhile, Jimmy Carter, who was not a eulogist, sitting in the crowd with Rosalind.
And all of this, nobody will ever convince me that this didn't happen.
They're listening to all this, and I'm telling you, Carters probably can't believe it because they're ex-presidents now, too, but nobody's saying this stuff.
I mean, Carter is well known as the worst president ever at this time.
He's a joke.
Misery index and all that kind of stuff.
And Rosalind's watching all this.
All of these wonderful things being said about the despised and hated Nixon.
And she jabs Jimmy with her elbow and says, you believe this?
And what the hell are you doing?
You're sitting there pounding nails, building houses.
Habitat for humanity.
Big whoop.
What are they going to say about you when it's time for your state funeral?
He said, pounded nails.
And ever since then, folks, Jimmy Carter's been out there inserting himself every chance he gets to the tune of winning a Nobel Prize by ripping Bush.
So I submit it was the Nixon funeral that gave us the post-presidential Jimmy Carter that we all see and hear.
So forth.
Anyway, I got up against on time here.
I got to take a brief time out.
We'll do it.
We'll come back.
We'll continue after this.
Ha.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen, your guiding light through times of trouble, confusion, murkiness, tumult, chaos.
And we're getting the audio of this pretty soon.
Wisconsin teachers leading students in anti-Scott Walker chants at the Wisconsin State Capitol.
Wisconsin teachers, just kind of like we had all the Barack Hussein Obama stuff.
Early on now, we've got teachers leading students in anti-Scott Walker chants in Wisconsin.
Also, what, oh, folks, the Libtards are just, I found this out infuriated with me.
Remember the call we got yesterday, which I thought was a great call.
It wasn't even my idea.
I mean, I wish I could complain.
I wish I could claim credit, but I can't.
It was a caller who called us in Russia.
I got a question here.
The Japanese, more than anybody else, have done everything they can to save the planet.
They gave us the Prius, the electric cars, and so forth.
And what did Gaia do?
Gaia wipes them out.
You got the tsunami, the earthquake, the nuclear problems, and all those cars and the places they were made got swamped.
Boy, Gaia got no respect here for the efforts the Japanese have made to save her.
So we repeated what the guy said, chuckle about it.
And the Hollywood reporter has a story.
First off, how I am terribly insensitive for mocking Diane Sawyer for her discovery of recycling and then quoting the caller talking about Gaia.
The Libtards, I am told that the Twitter universe is afire with Libtards screaming about me for being insensitive and so forth about all the suffering over there.
We need to get that Diane Sawyer soundbite from yesterday.
Folks, look, here's, remember now, great minds, ideas.
Average minds, people, small minds, or average minds, events, small minds, people.
We've got a country over there that is in some, I mean, death throes.
We've got earthquakes, which led to tsunamis, which is leading to all kinds of nuclear problems.
The scope of the problems facing the Japanese people are quite large.
It's huge.
And okay, good.
We got this.
I don't want to paraphrase it.
Diane Sawyer, ABC News, who I've met and I like.
Don't miss.
I like Diane Sawyer.
She's anchored at ABC World News tonight.
I just.
Let's see.
You know, I love analogies.
Hurricane wipes out my house.
Totally wipes out my house.
The only opportunity I have is flashlights to see at night.
Diane Sawyer comes to cover the devastation and praises me for keeping the flashlight off so as not to disturb the turtles.
Look.
Look.
Rush is keeping the flashlights off for the turtles.
All right, with that best analogy I come up with here on the fly, here's.
This is a shelter.
Some of these people here for days.
And look, it's recycling.
Organized for recycling.
Plastic, combustible barnable.
Oh.
Canes.
Oh, look.
It's recycling.
She's discovered recycling in the midst of earthquake, tsunami, devastation.
I got to take a break here.
Otherwise, folks, it's, I don't trust myself to not shut up here.
Okay, here we go.
This is yesterday in Madison.
We have unidentified teachers and students chanting protest slogans against Governor Scott Walker.
Your American left, your teachers in Wisconsin leading students in anti-Scott Walker protests.
Let's go back.
June 29th, Burlington, New Jersey at the B. Bernice Young Elementary School.
This is your American left on display and on parade.
Whose house?
Our house.
Whose house?
Our house.
This is what democracy looks like.
Hey, hey, ho, ho, Scott Walker got to go.
Hey, hey, ho, ho, Scott Walker has got to go.
Nana, hey, hey, kiss of goodbye, as far as I'm concerned.
But this is Ohio's next.
Kasich presented his budget last night.
Ohio's next.
Indiana is going to be up.
It's going to be the same thing in all of these states where they've got underfunded pensions and they no longer can afford to act as a money laundering operation for the Democrat Party and the unions.
What it's going to look like.
It's only going to get worse, particularly ratcheted up during the campaign.
So sit tight, folks.
We've got an exciting hour yet to go.
▲
Export Selection