All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 25, 2011 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:45
February 25, 2011, Friday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
From behind the golden EIB microphone, Rush Limbaugh emitting vocal vibrations from the left coast to the right coast, including all of the flyover country in between on Friday.
Live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida, it's Open Line Friday!
Open Line Friday.
Yip, yip, yahoo.
Whatever you wish to discuss, feel free.
That's the dream, the golden opportunity afforded you by me, your autocratic, benevolent dictator host, Rush Limbaugh.
On Friday, I relax a strict requirement in place Monday through Thursday.
That being, you have to talk about something I'm interested in or you don't get on the air.
But on Friday, I cast that aside, take the most awesome career risk anyone ever takes in big media, turning over the content of the program to you, rank amateurs, lovable, rank amateurs.
Well, I know, but that was 10 weeks ago, and it's 10 weeks ago was a bomb, I know.
It was bad.
It was really, really bad.
But that's the risk that you run.
That's why it's a huge career risk.
It was so bad, folks, I was unable to salvage much of it.
So we always take that risk.
800-282-2882, if you want to be on the program, the email address, lrushbo at eibnet.com.
That last caller that we had, I wish we would have had more time.
He actually was going to say that what had opened his mind and changed his mind to the fact that he could do even better than he was in a union was listening to the free market concepts espoused on this program.
And that caller seems to have converted from being a taker to a maker, which means, ladies and gentlemen, it can happen.
People are redeemable.
There are no lost causes.
Now, if the union thugs ever find out the ID of that last caller, he'd probably be in more trouble than an apostate from Islam.
That's why we didn't mention his real name or any of that.
But as it was, that's a very heartening and inspiring call.
Why the GOP should not fear a government shutdown.
This Byron York at the DC Examiner.
He says a lot of Republicans on Capitol Hill are terrified of a government shutdown.
Look at what happened in 95, they say, when Newt Gingrich forced a shutdown with Bill Clinton, got his clock cleaned.
A disaster.
Party can't afford to repeat that.
But another view is emerging in Republican circles.
Perhaps Republican strategists have learned the wrong lesson from 1995.
Maybe this time.
While Republicans shouldn't seek a shutdown, they shouldn't be afraid of one either.
There are five reasons.
One, if shutting down the government 95 was such a catastrophe, how come the GOP not only kept control of the House in the 1996 elections, but remained in the majority party in the House for 10 years to come?
The voter revenge predicted at the time didn't happen.
Number two, even if the 1995 shutdown hurt the Republicans, and there's no doubt the party suffered wounds inflicted not only by Clinton, but also by themselves, today's voters are in a different mood.
We have fiscal crises at the federal, state, and local level, and voters understand that, says Bill Paxson, a former Republican lawmaker and veteran of the 95 shutdown.
Back in 95, we were whistling into the wind.
We were trying to preach fiscal discipline when voters were saying, hey, there's not a problem here.
Three, Republicans like House Speaker John Boehner have learned from their mistakes.
Boehner said recently that our goal is to cut spending and reduce the size of government, not to shut it down.
And he's repeated that statement many times.
If you contrast that to 1995, Paxson recalled that we said we wanted to shut down the government, that it was a good thing, that it would get people's attention, that it would advance our cause.
Well, now it's Dingy Harry and other Democrats who seem itching for a shutdown because they think a history will repeat itself.
Fourth, today's media environment is substantially different.
In 1995, there was no internet, there were no bloggers, no Facebook, no Fox News, says Dick Army, who was the House majority leader during the shutdown.
The discourse of politics today is carried out in a media world that did not exist then.
Now, that doesn't mean there wouldn't be negative coverage of Republicans if a shutdown happens, just that the overall media picture would be more balanced.
The fifth reason Obama's not Clinton.
In 1995, Clinton was at the table working hard, sleeves rolled up.
Everybody knew that we were having meetings in the White House and the president was engaged, says Army.
This president is seen as disengaged and aloof from the process.
Obama's a rank amateur compared to Bill Clinton, says Army.
Looking back, Republicans concede that Clinton had their number.
They particularly remember the January 1996 State of the Union show.
When, after the shutdown was over, Clinton laid a trap that still makes him wince today, praising the dedication and commitment of federal workers.
Clinton pointed to a man named Richard Dean, Social Security employee who was in the Mura Federal Building in Oklahoma City when it was bombed on April 19th, 1995.
Escaping the rubble, Dean went back into the building and saved three lives.
Clinton brought him to Washington to attend the speech.
And when Clinton asked the audience to applaud Dean's service and heroism, lawmakers, including all the Republicans in the room, burst into an extended standing O.
But Clinton had more to say.
He said, Richard Dean's story doesn't end there.
That last November, he was forced out of his office when the government shut down.
The second time the government was shut down, he continued helping Social Security recipients, but he was working without pay.
I challenge all of you in this chamber: never ever shut down the federal government again.
Democrats burst into applause.
Gingrich sat on his hands.
Republicans knew they'd been outfoxed again.
That was only half of the being outfoxed.
The other half was that Clinton had gotten together with all the government unions and said, Look, you're going to get your Thanksgiving turkey.
You're going to get your Christmas turkey.
You're going to get your back pay.
But I want you to go out there and act like it's the end of your life, that you're not going to be able to make ends meet.
And they did, of course, did.
And they were all over CNN.
They were all, remember, there was no Fox News back then.
They were all, and there was no PMS NBC to speak of.
And they were all over CNN just, I mean, with some of the biggest sob stories you've ever heard.
And they were mostly women and minorities that were singing the blues and talking about all the pain that the Republicans had caused.
And they're sitting there with their little kids, and they made sure to get emaciated kids because the school lunch program supposedly was also being targeted.
Now things have changed.
And by the way, Clinton lied because even the AP admitted that no one, not one person, at Social Security lost any money during the government shutdown in 1995.
But as I mentioned in the opening hour of today's excursion into broadcast excellence, the AP today has an entirely different take on the government shutdown.
Their headline on their story is pst, no shutdown during a government shutdown.
They know that if there's a government shutdown this time, it's the Democrats are going to take the hit.
So state-run AP is, it's really not going to shut down.
There's no shutdown if it shuts down.
Social Security checks would still go out.
That's the first sentence of the story.
Troops would remain at their posts.
The wrong boats would still be chartered in Libya to get Americans out of the country.
Furloughed federal workers probably would get paid.
And virtually every essential government agency like the FBI, the Border Patrol, the Coast Guard would remain open.
Now, all this is a direct contradiction of the lies that Harry Reid, the rest of the Democrats have been spreading about a possible shutdown.
And then AP says, that's the little-known truth about a government shutdown.
It doesn't shut down.
Hey, if the Republicans shut down the government, it's not really a shutdown because they know that the Democrats are going to take the hit on this one.
So very simple to explain.
Some might know what, not know what AP is doing here, but we do.
And it won't be on March 5th, AP says, even if the combatants on Capitol Hill can't resolve enough differences to pass a stopgap spending bill to fund the government while they hash out legislation to cover the last seven months of the budget year.
Fewer than half of the 2.1 million federal workers subject to a shutdown would be forced off the job if the regime followed the path taken by Reagan, Bush, and Bill Clinton.
And that's not counting 600,000 Postal Service employees or 1.6 million uniformed military persons.
So you see, folks, it can be a shutdown even if there is one.
No shutdown.
Proof positive that AP understands full well the Democrats are the ones taking the hit.
Brief timeout.
Open line Friday resumes.
El Rushbo back before you know it.
I saw a picture of Mick Jagger the other day speaking of the Rolling Stones here in the bumper rotation.
I thought, my gosh, man, iron your face.
It was, it was, I stunned.
At any rate, back to the phones.
Open line Friday, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
This is Lenny.
Hello, sir, and I thank you for waiting.
Hi.
Oh, man.
Thank you so much for taking my call.
The Super Mega Dittos, Maharashi.
Thank you, sir.
Thank you.
I love your energy, my man.
Oh, thank you, Becky.
Listen, I'm so excited because, you know, I've been listening to you for 22 years.
You are a man of your word.
You are worth your salt.
I thank God for you each and every day.
Like I was telling Bo Snerdley, you know, being an African American, I've been a 22-year in-the-closet rush listener.
But I'm out of the closet.
I can't take it no more.
I was telling Bo Snurley that, you know, while it's like deja vu, I'm listening to the wrong fairies being sent to evacuate our people from Tripoli.
And I'm like, is this Iran 1979?
Is Jimmy Carter back in office?
It's like the Twilight Zone.
It is.
It's Carter's second term.
It's a pretty good analogy that you've got there.
It's crazy.
And see, and it was because of Carter that made me join the Navy.
And I was over in Lebanon.
I was over in that region in 1982 and 83 when we lost my friends and the Marines and stuff like that.
And to have someone that's so passive in the office who doesn't have, he's not worth his salt.
He won't stand up and say anything to his buddies in the Middle East.
And that's what they are.
They're his friends.
It's some kind of connection, you know.
And not trying to be conspiratorial, but that's what's going on.
It's not conspiratorial at all.
Right.
You're just being, I think, very, very astute in your observation.
Well, I have, you know what?
I get to thank God, and I get to thank you for that because, like I said, Rush, I've been listening to you for 22 years.
And, you know, I don't come out the box and tell people, well, this is what Rush says.
I take your knowledge that you put out there for all of us listeners, and I just present it in the way that I was made.
Ladies and gentlemen, if I may interrupt for just a second here, Lenny, for those of you new to the program today, this caller is showing the proper reverence.
Okay, Lenny, continue.
Yeah, and so, you know, as I said, man, I started listening to you.
I'll never forget the first time I started listening to you.
It was like, it was 1988.
I was working as security guard back at a company that's defunct now, telecommunication company in Crystal City, and listened to you on WMAL.
Then I moved to Colorado Springs.
Then I moved to, you know, North Carolina.
And I'm just an avid listener.
I absorb everything you say.
You know, I'm not a mind-numb robot, but I check what you say.
I bought products that you have suggested, and they work as you have stated.
And I'm like, if people would take the time to settle down and listen to what the Maha Rushi has to say.
Amen.
Talent on load from God.
You know, I want to congratulate you on your marriage to Catherine.
I love the golf show.
I'm just, you know, I can't get enough.
I'm like probably a lot of listeners who wish you were still on TV because I used to watch you as many times as I could back then.
You cracked me up.
And I still see Clinton leaving that funeral for Ron Brown and laughing one minute and crying the next.
How can you dispute this?
He's showing it to you.
He's letting you hear what the people have to say out of their own mouth.
You're not propaganda.
You are bringing them, you know, bringing what they are saying and what they're doing.
And, you know, I'm on this, I'm down here in Western Salem.
I'm here working at the place where a coach has given his kidney to a player, where another person received a medal.
I saw that.
That is a heartwarming, amazing story.
I did see that.
Isn't it?
It's awesome.
And it happened at Black History Month of all months.
And I was telling Bo, this is my second time getting through to you.
And I'm like, it must be my Black History Month special.
I get to talk to Rush for another time.
You're a lucky month.
Yeah, yeah.
Black History Month, you're a lucky month.
That's why I tried it.
I thank you so much, Rush.
And just continue blessings on you and your family and your whole staff.
And that your word will just ring true to everybody.
Thank you very much.
Now, Lenny, before you go, you did call about something entirely different.
I don't want audience to think that we put you on the air just for the proper reverence that you've shown.
Right.
You did call about something.
Well, what is it?
Well, I called to say that while we're having, while the Mideast is going to hell in a handbasket, our president is having a celebration of Motown and the White House.
What is up with that?
You know, there was a celebration of Motown in the White House last night, and there was one Motown artist, Smokey Robinson, who was the second one.
Stevie showed up?
Okay.
Well, then in the original guest list Stevie, then Stevie had to be a surprise because the announcement I read prior to it said one Motown artist, Smokey Robinson, William, Bill Robinson is the name.
But the interesting thing here is, Lenny, that you may not know, I saw this and I said, what the hell is this?
They had workshops during the day presided over by the first lady for children about Motown and what it meant to them.
Workshops like breakout study groups.
The meaning of Motown.
Well, I'm sure they serve food to the kids.
I don't know what they served.
I have no comment.
I have no knowledge of what food they serve the kids, but they had work groups.
Work groups for the kids to learn about Motown.
Who obviously too young to know about Motown.
So who knows what they were the kids had parents?
Yeah.
Yeah.
Well, the regime obviously can't trust the parents to have told them the right things about Motown or to have told them anything about Motown.
So anyway, I just, I thought it was, I understand the tribute to Motown, but certainly there are clearly more than two Motowners still alive.
It's what do you mean by wait, what do you mean, like Nero?
You mean Nero fiddled while Rome burned?
Well, and you know the truth about that?
It was Nero that set the fire.
Nero set the fire.
Nero wanted to burn Rome down, and he sat there and fiddled while it burned.
It was so far gone that he just burned it down himself.
He set the fire.
I said, okay, we rest our case.
Obama, Nero.
They're having a lot of parties, and they are having a lot of vacations.
I've never seen a first family.
It takes as many vacations and throws as many parties.
Nero wanted to burn Rome down to remake it in his own image.
We rest our case again.
He wanted to call it Neuropolis.
He wanted to get rid of the name Rome and call it Neuropolis.
No kidding.
That's what happened.
He set the fire and then sat there and fiddled while Rome burned.
We'll be back.
Thanks, Lenny, very much.
It was somewhat ironic.
Ladies and gentlemen, have a party in the White House celebrating Motown the day after it was announced that Detroit would have to close half of its public schools.
But that's this regime.
You want to hear something hilariously funny.
This is from the Associated Press, state-run out of Montana with each bill.
Let me give you the headline.
Tea Party vision for Montana raising concerns.
With each bill, newly elected Tea Party lawmakers are offering Montanans a vision of the future.
Their state would be a place where officials can ignore U.S. laws, force FBI agents to get a sheriff's okay before arresting anybody, ban abortions, limit sex education in the screws, and create armed citizen militias.
It's the Tea Party world, but not everyone is buying their vision.
Now, this is not an editorial.
It's supposed to be a news article.
And when the AP writes that not everyone is buying their vision or something, that means they disapprove of it and they manage to find a couple of people to quote who share their disapproval.
It means that the disapproval starts with AP, their premise and their narrative starts with them, and then they go out and try to find a couple people.
It's not that people in Montana raising hell and AP hears about it, says, whoa, we got a story.
This is AP creating a story.
And what we have here is the Associated Press raging at a bunch of people who are passing laws which would, for example, ignore U.S. laws.
What the hell is going on?
We have the President of the United States himself is saying that law doesn't count anymore.
I'm not going to defend that law, the Defense of Marriage Act.
We have a president of the United States who himself is lawless.
We went through this in great detail yesterday.
Make no mistake.
And it's not arguable.
This is a lawless regime.
And so here, the AP in Montana is about to have a conniption fit.
They are having a conniption fit because of the Tea Party vision for Montana.
Some residents, Democrat Governor Brian Schweitzer, even some Republican lawmakers, say the bills are making Montana into a laughingstock.
And they say the push to nullify federal laws could be dangerous.
Well, really?
Well, where are you, AP, on the defense of marriage and this regime simply choosing to ignore laws it doesn't like?
How about when a president ignores various federal court rulings?
We've had a federal judge has ruled Obamacare unconstitutional.
No big deal, we're going to keep implementing it.
And you worried about lawlessness in Montana?
We've had a, we've had an administration that's came out, come out and say, you know what?
This Defense Of Marriage Act has been around since the Clinton years.
We don't like it, we're not going to defend it anymore.
Lawlessness president does not have such authority.
And yet the AP wants to tell us how off the tracks and wacko they're getting in Montana.
The governor there, Brian Schweitzer, said, we are the United States of America.
This talk of nullifying is pretty toxic talk.
That led to the Civil War.
It would probably be pointless to point out to Governor Schweitzer that the so-called nullification crisis of the 1830s was actually resolved before the Civil War began.
Probably wouldn't do us any good to point out that his analogy is flawed.
Whatever their merits, the ideas are increasingly popping up in legislatures across the country as a wave of Tea Party-backed conservatives push their anti-spending, anti-federal government agenda, as though somehow that's criminal.
Anti-spending, anti-federal government.
Arizona, Missouri, Tennessee are discussing the creation of a joint compact, like a treaty, opposing the 2010 health care law.
Idaho, it's already been declared unconstitutional, AP.
Idaho is considering a plan to nullify it, as is Montana.
Why?
How radical?
All of this is happening within the bounds of the law.
They're passing legislation to do this.
They are not unilaterally implementing things such as our president is doing.
Why, this is almost as radical as ramming health care reform through Congress via budget reconciliation.
That was not intended to be used for actual legislation either.
Budget reconciliation wasn't, but they tried it.
Listen to this, folks.
Audio soundbite.
Last night in Madison, Wisconsin, this is on the floor of the Wisconsin Assembly after the Assembly passed Governor Walker's Wisconsin budget bill.
This, we have just 11 seconds of this, but it'll give you an idea of what happened.
Assembly Democrats reacting and protesting the vote.
This is not union thugs.
This is not citizens.
This is actual Assembly Democrats.
And this is the kind of thing that might happen in Japan.
It might happen elsewhere.
It doesn't happen in the United States.
Assembly Democrats in Wisconsin reacting to the budget bill being passed in the Wisconsin Assembly.
Yeah, they were all upset, too.
They claimed that Walker shocked them on this, surprised them on this, did all this before they even had their coffee.
But Walker is confident.
Standing firm last night in Madison, Wisconsin.
Let me be clear.
This bill is not about me.
This bill is about the hardworking taxpayers of Wisconsin.
We have got to balance this budget long term.
You see, it's not just about now, it's about the future.
And I, for one, don't want to pass this problem on to my children.
I don't want to pass that on to anybody else's children in this state.
This is a mess we inherited with $3.6 billion when it comes to this budget deficit, and it's not fair to pass it on to the next generation.
That's what got us in this trouble in the first place.
Yep.
And he's hanging tough so far, and that we hope he does.
Shame, shame, shame.
You like all this new civility coming from the Democrats?
After Obama asked us to do this for the little girl killed in Arizona.
Fulfill her idealistic expectations.
A new era of civility.
And note that that memo has fallen on so many deaf ears on the Democrats' side.
What do they know from shame anywhere?
A bunch of shameless people.
Back to the phones to Marion, Ohio.
This is Jeff.
Great to have you on the program, sir, and welcome.
Hi, how you doing, sir?
Very good, sir.
Thank you.
I called to say that with the lady that you had on there earlier in the program about what she was saying about why Obama was talking about the oil problem overseas and that.
Yeah, overseas in that, right.
I'm sorry.
Yeah, you said Obama talking about the oil problem overseas in that, yeah.
Yeah, well, I think sometimes they nitpick too much on the presidents.
I don't necessarily care for Obama, but I'm referring in general to whichever president's in there, whether they're Republican or Democrat.
Right.
That I think that they don't have nothing else to find fault with the president about, so they nicktick and just pick out something like that where the man's got no problems going on.
Jeff, give me an example of what you mean by the nitpicking, say of Obama.
What have you heard that's nitpicking of Obama?
Well, like do they want one particular agenda taken care of?
Like, say, did they think that he ought to be more concerned about the unemployment, but yet he's talking about the oil problem overseas?
And they just nitpick on him about just one particular thing that they're not looking at the whole picture that the man's got more than one problem that doesn't work.
I just want to understand, you think it's nitpicking to say the president is ignoring job creation while focusing on the oil price.
Yeah, that's what they're saying, yeah.
Yeah.
And I don't think that that's completely true because it's like a president of a company that they're trying to bring in more business in order to keep the workers going, but yet at the same time they've got all the maintenance problems that they've got to pay.
They've got to look at the bills.
They've got to make sure the money's there and stuff.
Well, how would you prefer to hear the president discussed and talked about?
I would rather see him take time to address, I don't want to say each individual problem because there's a lot of minor stuff, but the more technical stuff, such as the unemployment, I think ought to be first.
I think that the reason people, the reason people are, as you say, nitpicking the president on employment is because he spent close to a trillion dollars after promising, after boasting that he could do all this at the same time.
He could multitask.
He could do all this stuff at the same time.
He's a very smart guy, smartest president we've ever had, and that he was going to spend a trillion dollars and make sure that 4 to 5 million new jobs were created and the unemployment rate would not go over 8%.
He also told us that the world would love us once again.
All we had to do was get rid of George W. Bush and close Guantanamo Bay, and the Muslim world would love us.
Everybody would love us.
Foreign policy problems would be ended.
He has run around apologizing for the country, acknowledging to these foreign leaders what's wrong with America.
And look at the world.
It's on fire.
The world is literally the flames are erupting in the Middle East.
And so people are wondering, well, where do you spend a trillion dollars, four to five million new jobs?
Where are they?
Where is the unemployment at 8%?
And where is all the love for America?
Where is all this foreign policy success?
It isn't really nitpicking.
It's asking for some performance based on promise and expectation.
Well, I think that there's a little bit of a difference here because now you're talking about what the Democratic Party's trying to do in relation to the problem.
And to me, they ought to forget about the Republican Party and the Democrat Party and sit down and say, guys, women, we've got a problem.
We need to fix it.
We need to take care of the people.
Yeah, it sounds wonderful.
Republicans can sit down.
The Democrats could sit down and figure, guys, we got a problem.
The problem is, Jeff, the Democrats.
I would love to tell you something other than that, but we can't just pretend that Obama has had no impact.
We just can't pretend that good intentions are what count.
Results do.
And the problems facing America today are directly traceable to the American left, the Democrat Party.
Pure and simple.
Case closed.
Thanks for calling.
From the Cybercast News Service, the jobs created and saved by the economic stimulus law that Obama signed on February 17th of 2009 cost at a minimum an average of $228,000 according to data released by the Congressional Budget Office.
In a report released on Wednesday, estimated impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act on employment and economic output from October through December 2010.
That's the title of this thing.
The CBO said that it now estimates the stimulus law cost a total of $821 billion, up from the CBO's original estimate that it would cost $787 billion.
In the same report, the CBO estimated that in the fourth quarter of 2010, there were somewhere between 1.3 million and 3.5 million people who were then employed who would not have been had the stimulus not been enacted.
But regardless, $228,000 for every job created or saved.
But big whoop.
They were mostly public sector union jobs, and their votes will be worth every taxpayer dollar.
Make no mistake, Wisconsin alone, 75, almost 80% of the stimulus money went to public sector unions and ended up right back in the hands of the Democrat Party.
This afternoon in Washington, outside the White House, after meeting with President Obama, some Democrat governors, they had a meeting with Obama today, and the chairman, Martin O'Malley of Maryland, and other governors had a little press conference.
And after the press conference, there's a Q ⁇ A.
The White House chief correspondent of CBS Chip Reed asked O'Malley a question.
Are you saying there wasn't one word about this big battle of Republican employee unions that is spreading to many of your states?
I think most of us see that as a distraction, really, from the most important work that we can do, which is creating jobs.
So O'Malley said they didn't even talk about Wisconsin in the Democrat governor's meeting with Obama.
Do we believe that?
Do we believe that didn't come up?
You know what that tells me is that something big was planned.
Some huge, big ramble-rouse and something big is planned is coming.
Oh, no, nothing.
Fingerprints can't find any of ours.
We didn't even talk about it.
We were laser-focused on jobs in that meeting with the president.
We had nothing to do with that bomb going off down the street.
No, what are you talking about?
We were focusing on jobs.
Something big's planned.
Something big.
I tell you, it's either that or the polls got to be horrible for the unions.
They just have to be horrible for O'Malley's.
No, we didn't talk about it.
Whatever, it's not good.
Jay in Stillwater, what?
Stillwater, Maine.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
I want to start this call by letting you know that I am prostate on my knees amidst four feet of global warming facing Cape Gerardo, Missouri.
Well, proper reverence again being shown by another caller.
Yeah.
I'm calling today, Rush, because I'd like you to clarify my thinking, as you so often do.
I'm happy to help.
Now, in theory, the Tea Party is supposed to espouse and incite violence, but it seems to me in practice, the Tea Party is repeatedly proved innocent while leftist labor unions are repeatedly filmed advocating and actually committing violence.
Now, in theory, the Bush administration broke the law through its surveillance and medication programs, but this can't be proven because such surveillance can never be disclosed or proven because the feds can't talk.
And we can't believe anything the terrorists have to say.
But in practice, the Obama administration clearly breaks the law.
Federal Judge Vincent ruled that the Constitution does not allow the government to regulate inactivity nor mandate the purchase of any product.
Judge Feldman ruled that their oil drill ban is unconstitutional, and the refusal to defend the Defense of Marriage Act speaks for itself.
It seems to me, Rush, that the mantra is no longer how can we fool them today, but how can we rule them today?
Yeah.
How can we rule them today?
That's right.
You're not even worried about fooling us.
They don't even care to try to fool us.
It's just a poke in the eye.
It's just, it's in our face.
It's okay.
What are you going to do about this?
We don't like the Defense of Marriage Act.
It.
What are you going to do about it?
Judge said my health care law is unconscious.
Screw the judge.
Who the hell is he?
You too.
Moamer Qaddafi trying to buy off the protesters in Libya, offering them $400 per family.
What a chipskate.
Look at how much Obama spent for every public sector union job.
$400 versus $228,000?
Qaddafi doesn't stand a chance.
▲
Export Selection