All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 2, 2011 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:52
February 2, 2011, Wednesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of The Rush 24-7 Podcast.
All right, uh, some people, somebody is gonna have to explain a lot of things to me.
I have a lot of questions about.
Well, I may have the answers by virtue of the questions.
That may be the point of the exercise.
But this stuff going on, I mean, I'm being rhetorical.
I'm all the stuff I'm hearing about Egypt is nonsensical.
And it's turning out that one of the first things I used on the program Monday, food shortages, rising commodity prices, is playing a role in what's going on in Egypt.
And looking here, Mubarak says that he's gonna leave in eight months.
Uh the military's not attacked to protesters.
New government's gonna be in place, and yet the protesters are growing more violent.
Now, why is that?
That's my first question.
Why is that, ladies and gentlemen?
The protesters are getting seemingly everything they want.
And here you've got Obama laying pipe.
Now, that's that's a that's a uh that's a stage movie device where you lay down take it.
Hillary is had this is an example of laying pipe.
Hillary has had a 20-year relationship with New Barak.
So if all this works out, just by saying they lay the pipe, you can't connect the fact, oh yeah, it was it was Hillary and the regime, we're the ones who made all this happen.
Obama goes out there and makes he owns this now, folks.
Obama goes out there and makes speeches.
This is what happens, uh, ladies and gentlemen, when you run in front of a mob and claim to be a leader, you have to take responsibility for their actions.
It's why David Rodham Gurgan, unhappy that Obama went out and made a speech about this last night.
Obama is so he knows what the shape he's in.
He knows he's got an unconstitutional health care bill.
He's he knows he's got the American people two-thirds opposed to him and his policies.
He uh he desperately needs something here.
So he's tried to put himself in front of this thing in Egypt to make it look like he's in charge of it.
He's in charge of Mubarak leaving, he's in charge of the protesters doing the right thing.
Uh but this is what happens when you run in front of a mob and claim to be the leader, you have to deal with whatever the mob does.
And right now, everything Obama wanted has happened, and the mob is getting bigger, and the mob is getting more violent.
Mubarak says he's gone, not gonna put his son in charge.
The protesters have not been attacked.
You're gonna have a new government's gonna be in place.
And yet the protesters are growing more violent.
Why, ladies and gentlemen.
One of the things that we have learned that ginned all this up, in fact, that there have been attempts to create this level of protest for months, and they have all failed.
Until they started using Twitter and Facebook.
This this is why Egypt shut down the internet this week.
These people were using the social media.
All it took was some YouTube videos to show the uh uh protesters in action, you know, rioting and looting, and hey, that looks like fun.
Let's go join them.
Have you also noticed, uh, ladies and gentlemen, in Egypt, the number of protest signs written in English.
Have you wondered about that?
I have.
I have, of course, it's all for the media.
Anderson Cooper shows up over there.
He was attacked by uh by the mob in Egypt.
He was punched ten times in the head.
We have the uh audio of this CNN producer Steve Brusk tweeted Anderson Cooper attacked in Egypt Wednesday.
Uh said he was punched ten times in the head as the pro-Mubaric mob surrounded him and his crew trying to cover the demonstration.
Cooper then escaped to the roof of a nearby building, where he said on air that he and his crew were trying to get a neutral zone between protesters and pro-Mubarik supporters when they were set upon by pro-Mabarik supporters punching us in the head.
Crowd kept growing, kept throwing punches, kicked suddenly a young man would look at you and punch you in the face.
I don't know what side they thought CNN Was on.
But anyway, it's this is uh Katie Couric arrived yesterday.
Uh we don't know if she will be punched in the face.
Uh nor Brian Williams at NBC, but we'll keep a we'll keep a sharp eye.
Now, what is going on in Egypt, they clearly have an authoritarian socialistic regime.
But it's nothing like it was under Gamal Abdul Nasser.
I mean many people in this audience probably will know who Nasser is, but some of you won't.
Uh Nasser, bad guy.
I mean, that that Egypt under Nasser was far, far more repressive, punitive, uh socialistic than it is today.
This in Egypt is nothing compared to what North Korea is, for example.
Egypt is nothing compared to Zimbabwe.
The old Rhodesia.
Now there are there clearly is an a uh uh connection here to the rioting and food shortages, and you're not gonna see this reported in mainstream places because the shortages are brought about by us.
As I mentioned Monday, all of the printing money, QE2, the quantitative easing two, is causing a rise in commodity prices.
Ethanol is causing a rise in commodity prices around the world, and it is impacting, it's having a considerable effect on people.
And this is one of the reasons.
Also it may be about freedom, it may be a little bit about democracy, but this is economics.
This is gut level economics going on.
The Muslim Brotherhood did not start this.
We have now the Muslim Brotherhood saw something to get involved in, and they have sort of merged with it and made it look like it's their event.
But they are Johnny come lately's here.
China has shut down uh communication sites, social websites.
They do it all the time.
And we we just praised China, didn't we?
The Chincoms do all of the stuff that is happening in Egypt that we praise the Chicoms.
So, anyway, it is what it is, which is not much that's that's uh that's known.
Groundhog day today, February 2nd.
I just want to let you know I saw my shadow when I got up, which means that you are gonna have to endure six more weeks of civility on this program.
Uh let's go to the audio sound bites.
We're going to start here.
This is Obama last night in Washington, getting out in front of the mob, and claiming to be its leader.
It is not the role of any other country to determine Egypt's leaders.
Only the Egyptian people can do that.
What is clear, and what I indicated tonight to President Mubarak is my belief that an orderly transition must be meaningful.
It must be peaceful, and it must begin now.
Okay, so you see Pharaoh Obama ordering Mubarak what to do.
This this after Mubarak says he's Vomino's.
After Mubarak says he's leaving, he's getting out of there.
In eight months, Obama gives a speech to claim credit for it.
And did you notice the pharaoh-like reverb is back?
This was at uh the White House.
This is not how many times do you hear presidential remarks in the White House with the pharaoh-like uh godlike reverb?
So there you have it, Obama.
I indicated tonight to uh President Mubarak is my belief, orderly transition must be meaningful, must be peaceful, must begin now.
After it had already begun, well, after Mubarak announcing his intentions for all of this to happen.
Uh here is Obama talking to the protesters.
The last few days, the passion and the dignity that has been demonstrated by the people of Egypt has been an inspiration to people around the world, including here in the United States, And to all those who believe in the inevitability of human freedom.
The people of Egypt, particularly the young people of Egypt, I want to be clear.
We hear your voices.
But I want to be clear, we hear your voices.
And because I, Pharaoh Obama hear your voices, I, Pharaoh Obama, have gotten rid of your most detested leader, Hosni Mubarak.
And we're going to put this guy Elber.
By the way, the Egyptian people are not enamored of El Barada.
As the media would like you to believe that he is loved and adored, and uh everybody in Egypt wants him to be the next leader, they don't.
He hasn't spent any time in uh in Egypt.
He does he does not have a uh portfolio, if you will, of great support.
This is all media manufacture.
So there's Pharaoh Obama.
Now we go on to the state control media.
Drive-by media, David Rodham Gergen, CNN situation room.
This was before Pharaoh Obama's remarks on Egypt.
Wolf Blitzer.
Said you understand the diplomacy and all the sensitivity of what's going on.
What do you think about all of this?
I'm not sure what the president can say tonight that is not going to be thrown back in his face by people in the street and by Albaraday.
This president wanted to make the hallmark of his Middle East policy, his own speech in Cairo.
And yet tonight may be more important because he has to wash this fine line.
And you know, he does not want Al Barday and the protesters throwing things back in his face.
But how is he gonna walk this tightrope and still be uh a leader?
What a question.
How is Obama gonna walk this tightrope?
What is somebody throwing windows, throwing rocks through the windows of the White House?
Are are there mobs of people gathered outside the White House trying to get in to change leadership?
What what what what tight rope here?
I'll tell you what tightrope.
I'll tell you what, David Rodham Gergen knows.
He's worried, you know, Obama's gonna Obama's taking credit for the mob, folks.
I mean, this this is there's no that why else do the speech trying to take credit for Mubarak stepping down, which was supposed to end all the protests, or at least ratchet them down.
It was supposed to be what thinking these guys are clamoring for new leadership.
Okay, Pharaoh Obama comes in, makes it happen, fine, everybody goes home, except they're not going home.
They're ramping up, they're getting more violent, the numbers are increasing, and the signs are more and more written in English.
And so David Rodham Gergen instinctively understands that when Obama runs in front of a mob here claiming to be the leader or the impetus for the mob, then you have to take responsibility for whatever the mob does, and that's the fine line that Gergen is worried about.
I mean, what if these guys end up using some sort of really bad weapon to blow up the Sphinx?
And Obama owns these guys.
Obama's out there claiming that they're w we heard them.
We heard you.
We know you want to get rid of that Mubarak fella, 83 years old, been in there 30 years.
We hear you.
Here's Gergen after the speech.
Wolf Blitzer said, David, you didn't think it was uh necessarily a good idea for the president to speak out at this very sensitive moment right now.
Did the president change your mind after his god-like, Pharaoh-like with that echo and reverb speech last night?
Not really, Wolf.
He wants to see an orderly transition and begin now.
But he supported the idea of Hosney Mubarak running that transition, leaving him in power, and that's exactly what the people on the streets do not want.
You know, they want immediate and unconditional departure.
And the president fell well short of that.
I fear that from the United States point of view, we're now going to have the protesters saying the United States is resisting this.
And that worries me.
Folks, I feel an incredible sort of feisty mood today.
And I hear people in the media and at the highest levels of the ruling class saying, and this worries me.
So I wonder, did Mr. Gergen go home from CNN and sit in his living room and worry.
He may have.
He may have, which is.
It worries me.
Just it just worries.
Would you.
Would you worry about this last night, any of you?
Well, I know it's unsettling, but nothing you can do about it.
I mean, worrying about things well beyond your control is a waste of time.
Anyway, I um I really I worry about Obama more than I worry about Egypt.
If we're going to talk about being worried here, I mean, let's get things in perspective.
I'm far more worried about Obama and this regime than whatever's going on in Egypt.
At any rate, I have to take a brief time out here, folks.
We'll do it.
We'll get to your phone calls.
We have a great soundbite roster today.
Uh and the Super Bowl's getting closer.
The Hutch wants to come on the program on Friday for our annual discussion of the game.
Also on Friday, we're going to have a couple of Pittsburgh Steelers join us to discuss the game and uh and whatever, and possibly some others.
So we uh we we uh you know this program knows no boundaries.
I mean, with whatever whatever happens here, we combine irreverent humor with the serious discussion of issues, credibility on both sides.
This is a combination presentation unfound, unheard of anywhere else in major media in this country.
And we'll be back after our first obscene profit timeout.
Don't go away.
It's Rush Limbaugh, talent on lawn from God.
By the way, last night I got a see, here we go.
Last night I'm minding my own business.
Actually reading a novel, and I got an email from everybody Pete Wayner saying, hey, and if you haven't seen it, there's a great piece at our magazine, Commentary Magazine, called How to Understand Rush Limbaugh.
And I said, well, it must be if Pete's pointing it out to me.
So I I read it.
And I it it is for the first this guy writes about who's his name is uh Wilfred McClay.
And he writes uh how to put this.
We're into our 23rd year here, and he raises things that have not been asked before, other than by Zeb Chaffitz in the book, an Army One.
So we've linked to it at rushlimbod.com.
It's a long piece.
Uh we've linked to it there as well as at uh at Facebook.
I would heartily recommend that you um endeavor to read it.
Now, let's go back to last night in Egypt.
Could it, could it have been Obama's remarks last night that started all of the new violence in Cairo?
When he insisted that the transition start immediately, and it looks like it started with a vengeance, and we have news reports, Egypt's foreign ministry is blaming last night's remarks by Obama about how the transition must begin immediately for inciting today's violence.
And this is what David Rodham Gergen so worried about when he went home.
So where's the outrage?
Shouldn't Obama be held accountable for his insightful rhetoric?
No, but folks, I'm being dead serious.
We can I can be watching a football game on a Saturday afternoon, bothering nobody, minding my own business.
A Congresswoman gets shot in Arizona, and I hear that Sarah Palin and I are responsible for it 30 minutes later.
When I have never spoken about this woman.
To be honest with you, I had never heard of her until it happened.
So I'm just the way it was.
I had never brought her up.
I had never spoken about her.
Yet here I well, here's Obama going on television demanding all these changes in Egypt, getting out in front of the mob, and the Egyptian foreign ministry is even suggesting that maybe Obama's speech Last night had something to do with the outbreak of violence.
Why don't we send Obama over to Egypt to be their president?
And don't tell me he can't run for president of Egypt because he wasn't born there.
I don't want to hear that.
Apparently he can be president anywhere he wants to be.
Maybe a movement to get Obama's name on the Egyptian ballot.
He likes it over there whenever to make his speech in uh in Cairo.
So I I look it is it yeah, I'm I'm halfway serious about this snurtly.
It gets a little, you know, tiresome to sit here and listen to the left try to make all these bogus, fraudulent phony connections for the express purpose of uh censorship, shutting us down and so forth.
And here these guys are out there actually participating in it.
And this is why we got a sound by from F. Chuck Todd, F. Chuck not happy with Obama here.
They they know the tightrope that Obama is now on.
Having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have Rush Limbaugh behind the golden EIB microphone.
Here's F. Chuck Todd this morning on television.
It was MSNBC, the program call the uh the daily rundown, and he had Stephen Cook on counsel on foreign relations.
And they were talking about uh the clashes between the pro-Mubaric and anti-Mubaric groups in Egypt.
This is after Obama makes his speech last night.
It feels like the president's statement is almost obsolete, uh, President Obama's statement from last night when you're watching these pictures and we're seeing we know about the messages that have been sent privately, we know about the messages President Obama sent Osni Mubarak last night.
What's next?
What is the stick at this point for the U.S. government?
I think that uh President Obama's statement was quite good in a lot of ways.
But uh, this is existential for Hazni Mubarak and the regime, and what the President of the United States says at this point is virtually meaningless to them.
Oh, that has to hurt.
What the president of the United States says at this point is virtually meaningless, and F. Chuck Todd, president's statement almost obsolete.
Why?
Because the purpose of the president's statement was to send the rioters home.
And the exact opposite happened.
Obama makes his statement, puts himself in front of the mob.
Violence increases.
And now his uh supporters, stenographers and the state-controlled media are again.
This was the big moment, folks.
This this was the moment to recapture.
Uh Gabby Gifford's uh incident, that didn't work out quite the way they planned.
This was it, Obama, Cairo, Middle East.
It's not working out.
In the meantime, a federal judge has declared Obama's health care law to be unconstitutional.
The Republicans, it's quite it's actually folks a very it's a shame.
It is really a shame that news about Egypt and even news about the weather is keeping everybody from hearing about all the good things the Republicans are trying to do in the House and Senate.
Not just furthering votes on the repeal of health care, but there's this in a sharp challenge to the Obama regime.
House Republicans intend to unveil legislation today to ban the Environmental Protection Agency from regulating greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act and expect to advance the bill quickly.
The official said the bill would nullify all the steps the EPA has taken to date on the issue, including a threshold finding that greenhouse gases constituted danger.
This Supreme Court granted them this.
The EPA can effectively rule by fiat under the basis that greenhouse gases are killers.
And the Republicans are readying legislation to roll all that back and to restrict them.
Of course, Obama vetoes it, but that's the strategy.
You send all this stuff up.
The American people do not want the Obama agenda.
The American people, made up of independence, Democrats, and Republicans alike, said loud and clear last November And deep, not just to Washington, but to state capitals, to cities.
They don't want the Democrat Party agenda.
They don't want the agenda of Obama by a massive majority.
And so, yeah, we don't have the votes to override presidential vetoes, but we do have the ability to make him veto what the American people want.
We have the ability.
It's like Dingy Harry.
Dingy Harry won't bring up the repeal vote in the Senate.
McConnell's trying to make it happen anyway by attaching the repeal vote as an amendment to some piece of legislation on the Federal Aviation Administration.
So the Republicans, God bless them, bless their hearts, are trying to move in ways to limit and roll back this regime.
And they have been given a great boost by Judge Roger Vinson.
I don't know.
I don't care what you hear in public behind the scenes, the Democrats are worried stiff about this ruling and the notion that the whole thing's unconstitutional.
Now, one of the one of the things that I said earlier this week is that we that this could lead to a giant constitutional crisis.
And last night, I didn't see it myself, somebody sent it to me.
Last night on MediaIt, they wrote about that as though I'm some kind of a kook.
Which is fine, but they think the whole idea that the Constitution might be in crisis here is silly.
Why now why would that be?
What would it be silly to say that?
We have a federal judge who has ruled a major piece of legislation unconstitutional, and the regime is basically saying, well, it's going to go to Supreme Court anyway, so to hell with it.
But he has voided it.
It is not the law of the land.
And if they continue implementing it as though they are, they are in contempt.
They're basically looking at the Constitution and winking at it or spitting on it or turning their backs on it.
Constitutional crisis.
Now go ahead and make fun of pointing that out if you wish, but I hold here in my formerly nicotine-stained fingers.
A story I printed out from CNBC.com is the Obama regime throwing us into a constitutional crisis over health care.
Let's see if the media people go after this guy.
It's by John Carney, the senior editor at CNBC.com.
Are we experiencing a quiet constitutional crisis?
And I'll add another question.
Not only are we experiencing a quiet constitutional crisis, is it being done with thoughtful malice?
Do you think the Democrats in Obama didn't know that this is unconstitutional?
They knew they were going to have to argue this and they prepared arguments.
They knew the Commerce Clause did not permit this.
They did it anyway.
It's well known that Judge Roger Vinson ruled yesterday the individual mandate exceeded the powers of the federal government under the Commerce Clause, but...
But he also ruled that because the law lacked a severability clause, and the law's proponents had argued the individual mandate was necessary part of the scheme, that the entire law was invalid.
Wesley J. Smith explains the implications.
That means that under the ruling, the law is void.
It cannot be implemented from this point forward.
The regime's legal remedy is to seek a stay of a ruling pending appeal.
It cannot justify a federal court ruling.
And if it does, if it tries, the plaintiff should go to court for the injunction and or seek an order of contempt against the administration, which I suggested yesterday that one of the attorney generals of the 26 states suing the regime do.
Pretending that the ruling doesn't change anything when it unequivocally does would be both a petulant and extra legal approach to governance.
So has the Obama regime halted the implementation of the law?
The answer is no.
The website of the White House is unambiguous about this.
Implementation will continue.
This is a spit in the eye.
Vinson's decision did not include an injunction To stop the implementation of health care reform on the grounds that an injunction would be superfluous.
He argued the government would stop implementing the law automatically once it was announced as unconstitutional.
But that hasn't happened.
The judge, understanding the law, understanding the Constitution, and mistakenly, assigning an appreciation of the law and respect for the law to this administration assumed that with good manners alone, they would cease implementation once it was ruled that their law was unconstitutional.
He didn't even bother to include an injunction because he argued in his ruling that the regime would stop implementing the law automatically.
They haven't.
So here's a question.
Again, this is a CNBC.com piece, and this echoes what I first raised on Monday about this.
So here's a question.
Should government officials, mindful of the Constitution, start defying the Obama administration to honor the decision by the court.
If say you were charged with monitoring the computers that send out rebate checks to seniors with high prescription drug costs, should you turn off the computer.
Much of this is probably theoretical.
Most of the law did not yet apply, so implementation was minimal.
But if you were working on implementing the law, shouldn't you be obligated to stop work?
Pencils down, as we used to say back when a merger and acquisition deals fell apart.
And the headline is the regime throwing us into a constitutional crisis over health care.
And then the trailing question is that I have asked since before Obama was inaugurated, is all this on purpose.
A quick timeout, we'll be back and continue.
Your phone calls and other exciting.
One thing about this health care thing, just to try to put this in perspective for you.
I am I am compelled to point out again that Obamacare mandates the hiring of 16,000 new IRS agents.
Not 16,000 new doctors.
This is a health care bill.
This is a new health care law requiring 16,000 new IRS agents, not 16,000 new doctors.
Why?
Takes us right to the mandate.
It has to be discovered whether or not you're obeying the law.
Because if you're not, they have to find you and issue you a fine.
One way or another, they are going to get dollars from every one of us, including the 32 million uninsured.
We're either going to be forced to buy a policy, or if we don't, we're going to get fined.
And perhaps Pelosi even alluded to it, yeah, makes sense to me, putting people in jail.
That's unconstitutional.
But the regime is ignoring the court.
I don't know what you want to call it, but just imagine George Bush ignoring a court, a major federal court decision over anything.
Piece of his legislation.
Imagine Nixon telling the judiciary in the Washington Post, but you go, guys, go pound sand.
You think about it, we'll come back right after this.
Don't go anywhere.
And it has begun, ladies and gentlemen, National Review Online, the corner, Brian Buldock.
In light of Judge Vincent's ruling that Obamacare is unconstitutional, Wisconsin's attorney general, J.B. Van Holland, has declared the badger state free of any obligations imposed by the law.
Judge Vincent declared the health care law void and stated in his decision that a declare declaratory judgment is the functional equivalent of an injunction.
This means That for Wisconsin, the federal health care law is dead unless and until it is revived by an appellate court.
So a state A G, this is not precisely what I was suggesting, but a state A G Wisconsin stood up.
It's okay, it doesn't happen here.
No law here that we can see.
We've put it in a trash can.
We're not going to burn it yet.
We'll wait and see what other courts do with it.
What needs to happen is someone needs to go back to Judge Vince and say, Judge, uh they're not doing what you thought.
They're not they are continuing to implement this.
We need further injunctive relief from you.
The judge can't act on his own in this.
Just needs one person to go to I don't believe.
I think the judge needs someone to um ask him for this.
Clearly, the judge thinks that the regime will just obey the law.
And most people would expect the regime to obey the law.
I mean, these people are made up of the highest ranking law enforcement officers in the country.
Okay, to the phones.
We'll start in Greenville, North Carolina and Serena.
I'm glad you called.
It's great to have you here.
And hello.
Hi, Mr. Limbaugh.
How are you?
It's taking honor to speak to you.
Thank you very much.
Hey, I'm calling to you because I'm a little bit mad at you.
Because I got up this morning and I got on my Facebook and I saw the post that you had to look on that article on how to understand Rush Limbaugh.
And I read the entire thing, and it's absolutely excellent.
And you told your viewers that you hardly recommend it.
But it's excellent.
Why?
Well, no, no, no.
I did not say I said I heartily H E. Oh, I misunderstood.
That's my mistake.
I thought you said you hardly recommend it.
Oh, why would I even bring it up if I didn't want to recommend it?
That's true.
Well, I just wanted to tell you that I love you.
I listen to you every day.
I'm seven months pregnant, so I've got a genuine rush baby in utero.
Well, that young child is destined to pop out of there way ahead of the game.
Absolutely.
Congratulations.
Serena, thanks very much.
I appreciate the call.
Now I said heartily recommend H E A R T I O Y Chris in Darien, New York.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Russ, thanks for taking my call.
You bet.
I was listening to that clip in the beginning of your show of Obama saying that to the people of Egypt, uh, your voices are heard.
The young people of Egypt protesting over there.
And I'm trying to recall, uh, but I can't remember the press conference where he mentioned that Tea Parties, Tea Partiers' uh voices were heard.
I mean, we gathered in the hundreds of thousands to peacefully protest, and he he made no mention of it.
Not just Obama, but the entire Democrat Party.
Well, that's because you people in the Tea Party, you're a bunch of redneck pro-life pickup truck driving tobacco chewing gummers.
Yeah, I guess so.
You're just a bunch of hay seed hicks who probably wish you could live at Area 51 in Roswell, New Mexico.
I remember in his inaugural address that uh he said he would be our president too, but he he doesn't acknowledge us, and he he acknowledges destructive vote elsewhere.
This is uh this is I'm I'm gonna hearken back to what uh the story, the uh how to understand Rush Limbaugh piece is all with this guy writes about the fact that before Obama I mean he gets it right, he just he listened and he understood what I was saying.
Before Obama was even inaugurated, I didn't buy into any of the PR about Obama, the new day in America, nonpartisan, postpartisan, post-racial, and I didn't buy into it.
This guy points out there are probably a lot of people who didn't buy into it, but no one, none of them had the guts to say so.
So I you know, I it doesn't surprise me that Obama hears voices in Egypt but doesn't hear the voices of the Tea Party.
I know what he is.
He's a Saul Olinski leftist radical.
And my friends, it's it's not extreme to point out that the biggest enemy that Obama thinks he has is the Republican Party and the American conservative movement.
In a domestic sense, that's the largest enemy he's got.
That's the enemy he will not show any respect for or acknowledge whatsoever.
You don't exist.
We don't exist.
Our ideas are not even there.
Quick timeout.
Back after this, don't go away.
Despite the weather worrose uh and and weather news, despite what's going on in Egypt, the Republicans in Congress are doing a lot, great work trying to keep the Obama regime and agenda in check.
▲
Export Selection