All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 5, 2011 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:32
January 5, 2011, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Ha, how are you?
Rush Limbaugh, mind over chatter, starting a million conversations each day, and revitalizing the American news cycle, frankly.
You face it, when I'm not here, it's just kind of boring out there.
I've had so many people tell me that.
I mean, a liberals even make up less news when I'm not here.
But I'm back now, so the cycle of normalcy has resumed and all is well.
800-282-2882, if you want to be on the program, the uh email address L Rushbo at EIB net.com.
You know, I I find it just I don't know.
This some days this stuff bores the hell out of me, I have to be honest.
Some days it fascinates me.
And today it mostly fascinates me because I remember we had the story, the Democrats made a tactical decision not to say Obamacare will lower the deficit.
As they were moving toward trying to get this thing voted on and passed, they made a it was strategists for telling the Democrats to drop this claim that Obamacare would lower the deficit because nobody believed it.
They were doing focus groups and polls.
Nobody believed it going into the final stretch of the uh 2008 campaign.
And Eric Catters said you got 10 years of tax increases, you got six years of um more and ongoing benefits.
Of course, it makes it look like the reform lowers the deficit.
On top of that, Ryan said that they were double counting revenue in that televised meeting with Obama on the health care summit was total hooey.
If you remember the the the CBO's estimate, financial estimate on the whole thing was based on new taxes included in the health care bill.
If the bill is repealed, those taxes go away.
Now, it it's the the CEO figure was was this whole business of 143 billion dollars saved.
Obamacare saves 143 billion dollars, the whole that figure was obviously made up out of whole cloth just to give cover to members of Congress.
Even Pelosi said they're gonna have to pass the bill to find out what was in it, and it was in her bill.
So how on earth could the CBO be expected to project how much it was gonna cost?
They just made it all up.
Remember the magic number was one trillion.
They had to keep the cost under one trillion.
Uh otherwise they thought they'd lose the PR battle.
The mock they do, yeah, they did all play all kinds of games.
Everybody knew the smoke, but why do 65% of the American people oppose this?
Because they know it's all a lie.
And so now all of a sudden, when the debt ceiling, the death ceiling is a subject again, and uh deficit spending and getting it under control, all of a sudden now we're back to this thing the Democrats wanted no part of in the first place was that Obamacare is going to reduce spending.
And it's going to reduce the news.
I mean, even the CBO folks admitted that the only way the health care bill would save money was if the health insurance penalty or tax was really high.
You know the requirement that you pay 15% or more of your income for health insurance or go to jail.
That's the single most hated provision in the bill.
It's almost certainly unconstitutional.
Say nothing of other aspects of it.
So it just I'm glad they wait till I get back to start trying these tricks.
I really am.
I'm beginning to it's probably very boring for people, not just this audience, probably very boring for everybody in the news cycle when I'm not here.
Because none of this stuff happens.
Sometimes big worldwide events take place, but I mean the normal hustle bustle day-to-day stuff sorts of take takes a break.
Now back to this.
I mean we're gonna get to your phone calls quick here, I promise.
Uh the the Democrats are upset about so many things.
The Constitution's a fetish.
Scalia's gonna come talk to members of the House about separation of powers.
They can't stand that.
And here from the New York Times.
Companies spend millions of dollars every year complaining to Congress about burdensome laws and regulations, pressing Their concerns in public campaigns and private meetings.
They rarely wait for invitations, but last month, a senior House Republican Representative Daryl Issa, California, nevertheless, dispatched letters to 150 companies, trade groups, and research organizations asking them to identify federal regulations that are restraining economic recovery and job growth.
Mr. Isis has said the concerns of businesses had been ignored by the regime as it pursued what he described as an unprecedented regulatory expansion.
The responses have been predictable, but in asking, Mr. Issa also is underscoring the commitment of the new House majority to help bidness by curtailing government.
Kurt Bardella, spokesman for Mr. ICE, a lot of people have felt shut out of the process the last few years, and they have welcomed the opportunity to give input.
The rejoinder from Democrats was predictable.
Democrat Congressional Campaign Committee said in the statement, this is even more evidence that House Republicans are in the business of protecting corporate special interests instead of creating middle-income jobs.
Isn't ISA doing exactly what our elected representatives are supposed to do?
You know, when the Democrats reach out to their constituents, it's called listening.
Or buying.
Listening to us, all that rot.
And now that ISA wants to hear from American business, hey, what can we do to lower the burdensome regulation here and help you create jobs?
Somehow they get twisted around to pursuing corporate interests at the expense of jobs, according to Democrats.
So once again, the Democrats' hatred for the private sector surfaces and is on full display.
The White House apparently has uh flip-flopped again.
Last week they were caught trying to sneak in the death panels, essentially.
A federal rule that Medicaid doctors, in order to get paid by Medicaid, Medicare, had to have end-of-life discussions with their seasoned citizen patients once a year.
What's an end-of-life discussion?
An end of life discussion is all right, the day is going to come.
We're going to die.
And you may know you're going to die before you're going to die.
And we want you to figure out when it is you want to die.
So we pull the plug.
It won't be a burden on society, on Obama or Obama's health care plan.
We got a lot of money to spend on a lot of people at some point.
This is I'm so essentially, this would not be the words, of course, but the doctors have to say, look, at some point you're going to become a burden.
You're not productive, you're old, you're going to die anyway.
Uh the money spent on you is not going to be spent on you because it's being wasted because you're going to die pretty soon.
So we'd rather spend health care money on younger people, have more of a chance to be productive and maybe vote for Obama a lot more times than you're going to be able to vote for Obama because you're going to die.
And people got wind of this and said, aha, uh-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!
The death panels are back, death panels are back, and the regime said, No, they're not, no, they're not.
Apparently, the criticism held because the regime has pulled out that requirement again today.
So, um New York Times U.S. alters rule on paying for end-of-life.
Planning Obama dumps death panels as GOP prepares to go after Obamacare.
Of course, the question arises, why drop something that isn't there?
They I mean, who was it that came up with the term death panel?
You remember Dawn?
Sarah Palin, right.
Sarah Palin came up with the term death panel.
I think it was on her Facebook page.
And you know what people say about Sarah Palin.
She's she's an idiot.
Sarah Palin don't make me joke.
Don't make me Sarah Palin!
She's intellectual and I pencil away.
Sarah Palin, never gonna be president.
Sarah Palin, you go you kidding me, she isn't clueless.
Sarah Palin don't make me Sarah Palin came up with the term death panel.
Sarah Palin accused uh Obamacare of having death panels, and they denied it.
No, there are any death panels, but yet the White House has now said, okay, we're gonna get rid of the death panel rule.
How can you get rid of something that wasn't there?
Proving once again how stupid Sarah Palin is.
Hi.
We're back with El Rushbaugh.
As usual, half my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair.
I went to the emails during the break.
People, some people, not a lot, always focus on the people who have problems because they're the most fun for this purpose.
You really think doctors talk that way to their patients?
How dare you?
How dare you say that doctors talk to their patients or senior citizens' patients that way?
I said they don't use those words.
Well, what's the point?
If you're gonna have a federal requirement that doctors, in order to get paid by Medicare Medicaid, have to tell seasoned citizens about end of life counseling.
What do you think the conversation is?
About how long they're gonna live?
Why does they even care about this?
What people found objective is the hard truth.
As Obama would rather spend money who are going to vote for Democrats a lot longer than senior citizens are going to vote for anybody because they're gonna die.
Everybody knows these death panels were in there in the first place.
It's rationing.
It's the only way it can be done.
Everybody knows this.
And once again, the interesting thing about this is uh who who is it that gets all the credit all the time for Democrats being so concerned about seasoned citizens and their social security and their health care?
And yet who is it that can't wait for them to get out of the way?
So they have to spend money on them because they're no longer worthwhile to anybody in terms of voters.
Don't doubt me on this, folks.
It may have been a little coarse the way I explained it, but that's the message being conveyed.
You don't have the money to spend on your own health care, uh, we don't either.
We gotta we have our priorities.
You better think about how you're gonna go, when you're gonna go, and who you want to be there when you go and who you want to know about it.
That's what what is end of life counseling?
Remember when it was first brought up in the bill?
That phraseology was end of life counseling.
What the hell is that?
Everybody knows what that is.
How many people dying do you think need to be told about it?
Well, what kind of counseling is there?
Well, I mean, there's the kind of counseling that deal with it emotionally and all, but but politically?
And that's what this is all about.
Everything about this health care bill is political.
Don't for a moment think there's any compassion in this.
This is great.
This this is from the blog at the Investors Business Daily.
Stenny Hoyer offered insight into the psychology of the Tea Party movement.
Here's what he said.
There are a whole lot of people in the Tea Party that I see in these polls who don't want any compromise.
My assumption is they have unhappy families.
All of you have been in families, single parent, two parent, whatever, three parent, same parent, multiple parents, stepfather.
Fact fact is life's about trying to reach accommodation with one another so we can move forward.
It's certainly what democracy is about, so if we're gonna move forward, compromise is necessary.
You notice a compromise only necessary after Democrats lose.
But now, okay, Stenny, go ahead, just keep insulting the people that shellacked you.
And then wait for 2012 to come along.
Okay, so the Tea Party, rigid nonconformist, ideologues.
Refusing to compromise, come from bad families.
I didn't think there were bad families, according to Democrats.
Family is anything you want it to be.
Family can be you and your goldfish, which is a carp, by the way, if that means anything to you.
To the phones as promised to uh Jacksonville, Florida, Rob, welcome to the EIB network.
Hello, sir.
Happy New Year and happy birthday, Rush.
Thank you.
Hey, I wanted to you were talking about the uh Congress, Democrat Congressional Democrats and their arrogance and disdain for the Constitution.
I think that's fundamentally a religious problem.
They acknowledge no authority except themselves, and they won't acknowledge God as the Creator, and they won't acknowledge the Constitution and the people of the United States as their boss.
They are fundamentally arrogant, they lie through their arrogance, they will do anything to subvert this country and subvert the Constitution.
Well, I I think you've got a basic understanding of who they are.
I mean, they they're not godless, as if they have a different god than you and you and me.
The question the other question I had for you is you know, even our so-called Republican conservative representatives.
They always want to seem uh seek accommodation with them.
Even though we've told them we don't want that accommodation.
We want you to say hell no to everything that's been going on for the last two years and we don't want you to get along.
We want to overturn fundamentally everything they've done.
Be that health care, be that uh the the curly light bolt stuff, we just don't like what they've done, and they've got to answer to us, the bosses of the Congress and the president.
Oh no no no no well they they have answered.
They have they got shellacked but that only makes them hold you in more contempt.
That only makes you a bigger target for the next time they get their power back.
They find out you're a tea party if you're not from an unhappy family they're gonna make sure yours ends up unhappy you're right that arrogance condescension part and partisan of uh of liberalism Sophia in my adopted hometown of Sacramento, California.
Hi.
Hello?
Hi.
Um here us happy birthday next Wednesday.
Um I hope you enjoy it.
Thank you for well Sophia I just I you're 14 years old.
I just saw this on the computer screen.
Yeah that's right.
Fourteen and you know when my birthday is I am a rush babe so well thank you very much.
You sound like a very mature fourteen year old.
Well I think you're welcome so um earlier we're talking about um you were had a few clips of the I don't know her name sorry um the the lady who is um talking about the Constitution how people were like saying biblical like how she was saying how that they were she was like mocking them basically in the way that she she was saying oh they were using it as biblical text.
Well honestly the Constitution is like what this country is and if it weren't for this country she wouldn't have been able to even have said that without being persecuted probably severely in many other countries this country made her everything she is and she dares to mock it it really really really grosses me out.
For example, you, for example, are just great because you live the American dream, which is just fantastic.
Sorry, I'm kind of getting nervous here.
No, you're still doing great.
You don't sound nervous at all.
You just sound like you're in awe of me, and you don't need to be.
Well, I just, like, the Constitution is everything this country is.
if it were for that what would we be?
You know like how would this country have built anything that's exactly right if it weren't for what we would be a dictatorship tyranny of some kind like most of the people this country have to live.
Honestly if it weren't for America Benjamin Franklin I mean not Ben sorry he's the one who who like invented electricity like we still would be in like cavemen you know I mean we would be nothing.
Well according to certain women men still are and you'll learn that as you grow older but I know that's not what you're talking about today.
Yeah so I I just it just really grosses me out when people dare to to mock the Constitution when it's everything they are if it weren't for the Constitution they would be nothing and they mock what they are it's it's an oxymoron honestly.
Why do you think they do that?
I guess they think it's more powerful like I guess they think that they're cool.
I don't I don't I'm that's because they're afraid of it.
They are um uh the the the people you're talking about the Democrats liberals whatever they they will tell us who and what they fear by what it is they seek to destroy or what it is they they f uh endlessly criticize.
So they fear the Constitution and they fear it for the very reasons that you have stipulated the Constitution here here's a d this is the cut to the chase way to say it.
The Constitution is the greatest obstacle in their way.
What is the Constitution guarantee and preserve liberty and freedom for the individual?
That's the biggest obstacle.
Uh to the left, not just in this country, but anywhere around the world.
Liberalism is liberal socialism, socialism, communism is communism, wherever the people who believe in that stuff are.
And individual liberty and freedom are the biggest threat to big government statists, liberals, and democrats.
So I mean, your your your education on this is superb.
Don't let anybody change your mind as you grow older, and your instincts are um profound.
Uh your parents have to be like we, we're extremely proud of you, I'm sure, and I'm glad that you called.
It's great to have you on the program, and we will be back.
Constitution is a limit on government.
That, uh, ladies and gentlemen, drives the left insane.
The limit on government.
They just can't abide it.
Drives them absolutely wacky.
Philip, in Dallas, your turn.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Hi.
Rush, I want you to take these people's contempt for the Constitution.
I want you to wield it like a club.
I want you to beat them over the head with it.
I uh wanted to remind you of uh I don't know if you remember this, but in 2007, the left-wing publisher uh began putting warning labels on copies of the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Paine's Common Sense, the Federalist Papers.
This was wilder publications, and they put out a warning stating that uh this work is a product of its time and does not reflect the values as it would if it were written today.
Uh the disclaimer goes on to warn parents that they might wish to discuss with their children how views on race, gender, sexuality, ethnicity, and interpersonal relations have changed since this was written before allowing your children to read this classic work.
These people hate our country and our founding documents so much that they're putting warning labels on the Declaration of Independence.
And if I had to Now I I'm uh my my brain's churning here, and I don't recall, maybe I I'm I I memory's pretty good.
I don't remember this.
This was reported by Fox News in June of 2010.
I must not have been watching Fox News in June of two thousand.
Well, no, I wasn't.
I got much more important things going on in June of 2010.
Uh but I d I you know I'm listening to you describe this, and I'm trying to suppress laughter, although it's outrageous.
I think warningly.
I mean, what a great parody that would be, except that they're already doing it.
Rush, I want you to take this issue, and I want you to beat them over the head every day with it.
I want you to embarrass them with their own contempt for our constitution.
I you think they're embarrassable over contempt for the Constitution, right?
If you pound them every day, they are.
You can make these people look even dumber than they already look.
Well, if anybody can do that, it's certainly me.
Can I make one comment about the Mount Soledad war memorial?
Oh, yeah, this is the uh found unconstitutional.
Yeah, go ahead.
This is this is the uh cross and the memorial that's been found unconstitutional.
Yeah.
Yes, uh memorial to our fallen war dead.
Hi, yes.
It couldn't help but note the irony that in the same week, Al Qaeda on their uh uh international websites had been circulating uh uh ideas on how Muslims could destroy the cross, and I thought, what irony, Al Qaeda and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals are kind of working toward the same goals.
This is who they are, Rush.
Well who they are.
It's like I know, I know it's it's when I when I chronicled how I have heard Mahmoud Ahmadini's odd talk about America, and I could swear what's the difference in that in Obama or Stenny Hoyer or any other Democrat, the talking points between the totalitarian regime enemies of this country and the Democrat Party are identical in many ways.
Not Just about policy, but about people.
You listen to your average Democrat talking about Bush, it's no different than what Ahmed Denis Odd says about Bush.
And I got everybody sending me that Fox story on the uh story that you cited out there, Philip, about warning labels.
By the way, the what you read to me, I you can are you Philip, are you still there?
Hey, Philip, or did he get away.
I'm here.
You re read read uh the the warning label, what what it what about interpersonal relationships?
That that part you're read that again.
If you have it handy.
Before allowing their children to read this classic work.
Classic work.
Now, uh when you read that disclaimer, Philip, do you conjure an image of the person who might have written it?
Not physically, of course, but who?
Yes.
Well, who?
Who who I mean, obviously somebody in a publishing company, individually, what who is this person?
Give me a give me a profile.
Uh someone who is badly in need of deodorant, uh bath, uh, probably remedial lessons in economics, uh, probably desperately in need of of education as far as American history, and uh someone who inexplicably supports uh Stalinist version of government.
Okay.
Interesting.
I have a totally different take.
But that's what that's why I asked you.
I have a I mean, not you're right.
I mean, I I I wouldn't have thrown in the bath business.
Uh but the lack of education and the uh bias and the bigotry and so forth, yeah.
Yeah, it was written by a Democrat, Rush.
Well, of course.
Of course, there were many, many kinds of Democrats.
You could do warnings on a on an issue of Hustler magazine.
Uh no, but one really isn't needed there.
Yeah, but we treat our founding documents like pornography and we treat pornography like art.
We don't the left does.
The American left treats it, and and by the way, if you like it, how does it how do you feel now being called one as a fetish?
Well, I did I had the same exact observation as you did.
They have to uh apply some kind of sexual stigma to any idea of fealty or loyalty to our constitution.
They have to try to make me look bad or feel bad about it, and uh these are the same people who are wanting to talk to your kindergarten child about gay sex.
Uh it's it's not a fetish wanting us to adhere to the r uh rules and the founding documents of our nation.
This that's that's what guarantees our equality.
That's what enshrines our rights.
And uh, you know, if we're gonna go the communist route, I'm not gonna be around very long.
Uh ain't gonna happen.
Ain't gonna happen.
I mean, it's it's the the American people here are uh are awake and they are aware.
This is not twenty years ago when this program's if all this was happening twenty years ago, I guess take you back.
Let's go back to nineteen eighty-nine, ninety ninety one.
If this exact stuff was happening, if for the first time the Democrats were talking about fetish for the Constitution, perverts and so forth.
I I I guarantee you that um uh the reaction to it would be much different.
There would be fear.
Uh people wouldn't know what to make of it.
Oh my gosh, what's happening?
But now there's so much sophistication about who the left is, why they say these things.
Uh there's genuine you're not getting hold of my country, pal.
You can put warning labels all over every document you want, but you're not getting hold of our country.
Twenty years ago it was much different.
There was a um and it even you think about the twenty years ago, it we were in the in the throes then of the soon to come upset in 1993, the ninety four elections, rather.
So it it's I've been able to chronicle in twenty years how these things have changed, and believe me, the American people, it's taken a while, but they're up to speed on what they're up against now, and who's actually opposed to them.
So the more this stuff happens, and I remember 20 years ago when stuff like this was happening.
I can't tell you how alarmed I was by it.
Scared, and oh my god, what and I'd I go talk to people older than I who had lived longer than I without fail.
Mr. Buckley was one of these things.
Don't worry about it.
The American people get up to speed on this eventually.
They're never gonna get away with all they want.
You know, and when the election of Obama came along, face it, everybody thought, oh my gosh, now they've finally done it.
But look, after two years of pure undiluted openness about who these people really are.
Look at the degree of opposition to it.
I mean, this election, again, I cannot emphasize what a genuine overwhelming spanking this was for the Democrat Party, all across this country.
Now, there need to be repeats of this for many elections in the future.
Not just this one time.
But it's a far cry different today, the reaction to this kind of stuff than it was twenty years ago.
Twenty years.
I can't believe this.
How dare they?
Who do they think they are?
What are we gonna do about it?
Now it's it's it's a totally this the outrage is still there, but there's not fear.
There is a determination to stop it.
And there is a, in some cases, laughing at these people.
And more and more of that is um also starting to take place.
I must take a break.
Philip, thanks for the call.
I appreciate it.
We'll be back before you know it.
On a cutting edge of societal evolution, Rush Limbaugh here behind the golden EIB microphone.
Uh ESPN has uh fired Ron Franklin.
You know who Ron Franklin is?
He's a college football announcer, radio and TV.
Uh for ESPN.
He uh he got he got fired for calling a female reporter sweet baby.
And not on air.
They were having a conversation off air about something, and she wanted to be part of the conversation.
And he said something like, uh, this is for the men, sweet baby.
And she said, Don't speak to me that way.
Name is Ginian Edwards.
Don't speak to me that way.
I don't like to be spoken to that way.
Okay, then uh this is for us.
Uh leave us alone, a caller uh bodily orifice.
Uh and a colleague reported to him to ESPN, he's canceled, he's pulled off a couple telecasts or radio broadcasts, and then he issued an apology, but not to her personally.
So Ron Franklin is gone at um ESPN.
Parting won't be sweet sorrow for the ESPN uh sports anchor.
No, it's not an anchor, he's a he's a uh play-by-play game telecaster who is fired after insulting a female colleague, the ESPN spokeswoman uh told Game On that Ron Franklin's out because of his actions toward fellow announcer Janine Edwards last week during bowl game preparations based on what occurred last Friday, we have ended our relationship with Franklin.
Franklin's 68 years old, and still doing play by play in the ESPN booth.
Franklin issued an apology to Edwards for calling her sweet baby.
And then when she objected, amending it to uh that bodily orifice word begins with an A. Which is probably worse than sweet baby.
I remember once, folks, I was severely reprimanded for calling a co-anchor on the news in Kansas City deer.
Yeah, I said, they just just we had a decent relationship.
Called her.
She didn't complain.
Somebody else did, and then they said, if you say therefore one more time, you're fired.
I said, what?
Yeah, that their four colors clutters the minds of the audience can't say therefore if you do that you're gone.
Anyway, they said that uh uh Ron Franklin's um level of contrition was not satisfactory.
He wasn't sorry enough.
Uh he didn't feel so bad about it to apologize to her personally.
He just issued an apology.
So he's he is gone.
I can't bully sweet baby.
I mean, that wasn't on the air.
She's a sideline reporter.
Good lord, what is she here down there?
Anyway, that's as far as I'm gonna go with this.
You know how it is with ESPN, you never know.
Roger Stefner, Florida.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Great to have you here.
Uh yeah, Rush, first time caller, a long time listener.
I just wanted to make one point.
Um all the Democrats being interviewed on television today were saying how they wanted to focus on the economy, and the Republicans wanted to focus on health care.
Um isn't that what they did last year just time right after Obama said uh he was gonna focus on the economy like a laser.
That's what he said yesterday, too.
He said it yesterday, too.
Jobs yesterday Obama said jobs is his new focus.
This is about the fourth time.
He said jobs is his new focus, and he said he's gonna listen to anybody who has a good idea about how to create them.
Which he said that before, it's all smoke and mirrors.
But see, you're right, you're catching it.
They're not they're they're all the Democrats care about jobs also all of a sudden they care, and and Democrats claim the Republicans talk about health care is not focusing on the economy when it look it nobody is being fooled by what the Democrats say now.
That's that's the everybody's catching it.
You're calling to comment on it.
Uh nobody's being bamboozled by it.
They don't get away with this like they used to.
That's a positive.
Yes, sir.
Yes, sir.
Well, I I just wanted to point that out, you know, that all of a sudden uh they they want to start focusing on the on the economy after they shoved that huge health care bill down our throats last year.
Well, you're right.
You're right.
Roger, I'm glad you called.
We move on.
Uh Boehner, by the way, just I guess the election was long ago, hours ago.
Oh, oh, oh, there's Pelosi.
She's smiling.
Uh she's opening some book.
She does not have a gun in her hand.
I just want to report that.
Uh Boehner is uh standing next to her.
Let's look, our microphones are there.
Let's listen to a little bit of this as Pelosi introduces Boehner.
To the new members and their families, a special congratulations and welcome to you.
The eyebrows are not moving.
Oh, they did just went up a little bit there.
Congratulations to you.
Uh we all come here to represent our constituents.
Our respect for each other is founded in our respect for the people that we represent.
Yeah, right.
This month we will celebrate the 50th anniversary of the inauguration of John F. Kennedy as President of the United States.
As a student, I was there in the freezing cold.
For some of you, it was you've read about it in the history books about Michael and I, to us, it was our youth, right, Bob.
I was there in the freezing and heard the stirring address that inspired generations of Americans.
You must have forgotten what he said.
How in the world can she cite what JFK said?
It's 1962 State of the Union address right from here, from this dais.
Yes.
President Kennedy said to the Congress.
The Constitution makes us all trustees of the American people.
She's a fetish she's got a constitution fetish.
Did you hear this?
She is citing the Constitution.
We take the oath of office to support and defend our Constitution.
She's got a fetish for it.
We do so as trustees of America's best hopes.
Mike.
And custodians of America's highest values.
Okay, we got a bump out.
I cannot believe what a fetish this woman has for the Constitution.
She's referring to this as almost like it's a sacred biblical text.
I can't believe what I'm hearing.
I guess I get JFK was a fetishist too.
She's quoting JFK in the Constitution.
And uh we know now that people uh respect the Constitution, it's a fetish that they have.
And don't forget JFK's inaugural address was basically a declaration of war on communism.
And that's really it's it's why I find it really strange that Democrats today well, I know why they cite Kennedy.
It's uh not because of what he said, it's because of his last name and a number of other things.
Anyway, she's still up to refusing to pass everything over to Boehner's system.
▲
Export Selection