All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 22, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:30
November 22, 2010, Monday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Well, yeah, all of this plus the um I don't even think it's residual.
I think it's purposeful.
Damage to the airline industry that this is causing.
You watch, you watch what's going to happen this week.
You know, there's a the what Thanksgiving, the day before Thanksgiving, the ostensibly the best, uh busiest travel day of the year.
You wait and see what happens here.
You wouldn't see how long the delays are.
I want to be interested to see how many people miss their flights, miss their connections.
I want to see how over the top the inspections are.
Because you read this Atlantic piece, it's clear from the Atlantic piece that the agents were more or less instructed to try to scare people back to the scanner.
Let me read more from there.
By the way, well, you know who this is what we do.
So hi.
Uh several TSA officers.
It's a quote now.
Several TSA officers heard me choose the pat down, and they reacted in a way meant to make the ordinary passenger feel very badly about his decision.
One officer said to a colleague who was obviously going to be assigned to me, get new gloves, man.
You're gonna need them where you're going.
The agent snapped on his blue gloves and patiently explained exactly where he was going to touch me.
I'm gonna run my hands up your thighs, I'm gonna feel your buttocks, and I'm gonna reach under you until I meet resistance, I interrupted.
Yes, resistance.
You want to go into a private room?
He asked.
So they're trying they're they're they're they're trying to steer people into the uh the naked scanners where they're also playing their little games.
Don't think for a moment those images are gonna be deleted fully.
Uh and and not.
Example, you get some hunk of an athlete going through there who's maybe using steroids and therefore has a lot of shrinkage in the junk area.
You think that picture's not gonna be sent out for everybody to see?
Uh, you I don't care how you slice this.
This is a police state.
Whatever the intention is, and even if you are not subjected to an over-the-top pat down, they're still taking your belt off and your shoes off, and they're still going through the violations of the Fourth Amendment, and they haven't captured a single terrorist.
And what they're doing is not gonna capture a terrorist, but they are irreparably perhaps harming the airline industry.
This is and this is Obama, folks.
I mean, you you could almost say, you can almost say that this is the regime taking steps to subject everyone to the notion of a police state.
Here's what it's gonna be, uh get used to it.
This is how it's gonna be.
This is how it's gonna be in America.
Uh one thing that leads me to believe here that the uh Atlantic story has some uh some truth to it.
Yesterday on CBS Slay the Nation, host Bob Schiefer interviewed Hillary, who, according to James Carville, um, if she gave up one gonad to Obama, would still have more than he does.
Carvel said that.
He said, if you're offended, I'm not sorry, and I'm not apologizing.
So there's Hillary on there.
Bob Schiefer says there's a big uproar in the country now about this new pat downs are going on as people try to get on airplanes.
Do you think it's necessary in the war against terrorism, or should we take another look at this?
We're doing this because the terrorists keep getting more creative about what they do to hide explosives and you know crazy things like underwear.
So clearly there is a need.
Now, if there is a way to limit the number of people who are going to be uh put through surveillance, that's something that I'm sure can be uh considered, but uh everybody's trying to do the right thing.
And Madam Strong.
And I understand how difficult it is and how offensive it must be for the people who are going through it.
Uh and then uh Schaefer said this.
But would you submit to one of these pat downs?
Not if I not if I could avoid it.
No, I mean who would?
Okay, that's the that sound is the sound made by the Arkansas Broadbeam.
It's uh it's a it's uh living organism out there.
But there you have Mrs. Clinton saying, Oh, I wouldn't go through it, no.
No, I'm not if I didn't have to.
If I could avoid it, no, I would.
If I could avoid it, how do you avoid it?
There's a scanner.
If I could avoid it, I wouldn't go through it.
Well, no, I wouldn't want to see the scanner, but but but uh don't that truly is distracting, Mr. Snerdley, and I I really don't want to be distracted here.
Uh what happens here?
If if I were the terrorists, and I'm looking at this, I could have I I can see them sitting over there in the cave laughing themselves silly.
They send a guy over here with uh uh essentially a bomb in the underwear, and now look what we're doing.
We're searching everybody's underwear.
They send a bomb over here in somebody's uh breast.
Now we're now we're making women take their prosthetic breasts out for examination.
If I were the terrorists and knowing how they feel about women, the next terrorist would be a female Tampax bomber.
Can you imagine what the transportation safety or administration would ever would do if we captured somebody tried to get a bomb here in the Tampax?
If I'm Eamon Al-Zawahhiri, whoever these guys are, I'm having fun looking at all the commotion that they're causing.
Uh and the the assault on the uh on the airline industry that uh that they're causing.
And now you have Mrs. Clinton saying, Up, well, I wouldn't go through it if I didn't have to.
And then in Portugal, President Obama stood by no controversial screening measures Saturday, calling methods such as Pat Downson body scans necessary to um assure airline safety speaking at a NATO press conference.
The president called the balance between protecting travelers' rights and their security a tough situation is uh no, what is the story on that?
We're gonna have to stand on one shoe to do this now?
He sort of uh uh they call a balance between protecting travelers' rights and the yeah, so I guess we're to stand on one shoe now and be properly balanced as they go through the searches.
Gloria Allred, Friday night on Hannity on the Fox News Channel question.
Did they touch your body parts?
Yeah, they did.
It was the first time anybody touched them in a long time, and frankly, I liked it.
So there's Gloria Allred admitting it's been a long time since anybody touched her body parts and that she liked it.
So there are people willing to make light of this.
People willing to joke about it.
Last Saturday, Saturday Night Live did a skit.
We have uh a woman and three TSA workers in the skit.
Feeling lonely this holiday season.
Looking for little human interaction.
Do you want to feel contact in certain special places?
Then why not go through security at an airport?
TSA agents are ready and standing by to give you a little something extra to feel thankful about for holiday seats.
What are you waiting for?
I want to check onto your testicles.
And you never know who your agent will be.
It could be me.
Or me.
Or even me.
But it's probably gonna be us.
The TSA.
It's our business to touch yours.
All right, so they're joking about it out there now on uh on Saturday Night Live.
Uh Gloria Allred joking about it.
Last Wednesday on Capitol Hill during a Senate Commerce Science Transportation Committee oversight hearing on the Transportation Security Administration, administrator John Pistol said this about the procedures.
Do I understand the sensitivities of people?
Yes.
If you're asking, am I going to change the policies?
No.
I don't care what you do, I don't care how you react, we are not going to change our policies.
Now imagine if the Gitmo interrogators had done these kind of pat downs to newly arriving terrorists.
Imagine wait of those terrorists told their lawyers at the ACLU what happened to them if the if the Gidmo people were going through all this, you think you think the Koran in a toilet was a bad thing to have.
Wait, what can you imagine what would have happened if Gitmo detainees had to go through this?
And here is Obama from Saturday in Lisbon in Portugal at the NATO summit.
I understand people's frustrations, and what I've said to the TSA is that you have to constantly refine and measure whether what we're doing is the only way to assure the American people's safety.
And you also have to think through are there ways of doing it that are less intrusive.
But at this point, TSA, in consultation with our counter-terrorism experts, have indicated to me that the procedures that they've been putting in place are the only ones right now that they consider to be effective against uh the kind of threat that we saw uh in the Christmas Day bomber.
So that's that's why all this is being done.
Did you ever ask yourself, did this stuff just sort of start pop out of the blue a couple weeks ago we started getting these stories?
All the invasive pat downs.
What happened?
The Christmas Day bomber was a year ago.
So what happened here?
Didn't it all start after the election?
Does that mean anything?
I don't know.
But what was the catalyst for this?
Does it can anybody tell me?
Uh I was minding my own business, not bothering anybody.
All of a sudden I'm reading stories about this.
Every day this stuff starts happening.
And there's usually a uh a catalyst.
And I don't maybe there was, and I I just wasn't paying attention, but that's very, very uh rare that something gets by me.
Here's a a montage, ABC's Brian Ross in Good Morning America today reporting on the uh the new TSA screening procedures, and it's Brian Ross defending uh in Capitano.
This is a tense time in the U.S. and in Europe, where security officials privately admit they are scrambling to stop an expected terror attack of some kind somewhere soon.
From the airport pat downs in this country to a search for two suicide bombers believed to be at large now in Germany.
U.S. law enforcement officials say the twisted ingenuity of the Al Qaeda bomb makers is a good part of the reason U.S. passengers are now getting pat downs that they are using materials in their bombs that cannot be detected by all the expensive screening machines currently in place.
Okay, so that's it.
They got a couple terrorists out of loose out there and uh trying to catch them.
Oh.
Okay.
So I meet the press, David Gregory talked to Bobby Gindle, governor of Louisiana.
He said, TSA, these airport screeners, some of these searches really disturbing people around the country.
Is this excessive?
It feels too much from this administration like we're playing a defensive game in the war on terrorism.
Yes, we need to harden our infrastructure, but if you have a committed terrorist who's willing to give up their lives, you look at the past pattern.
We got lucky with the bomb in Times Square.
We got lucky with the cargo packages, we got lucky with the underwear bomber that the devices didn't go off.
Luck is not a strategy.
We need to be rooting out these networks, we need to be killing these terrorists.
I think the American people are worried when they see an administration worried about reading Miranda rights to the underwear bomber.
They worry when they see an administration committed to civilian trials, they wonder you're so worried about the rights of the terrorists.
What about the rights of the innocent American travelers?
Bingo.
And we'll be right back.
And back we are Rush Lindball behind the golden EIB microphone, having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have you.
I keep people keep asking me, when are you gonna have your iPad, an iPhone uh uh 24-7 appropriate?
We're working on it, and we're close uh from what I have uh been told.
We it it's it's no problem streaming the video from the Ditto Cam.
And I've got to beta on one of my iPod touches.
I can do it.
The problem we're having is matching up our subscribers um uh with the software to do this.
And Direct TV's pulled it off.
They've managed to do it with their Sunday ticket business.
So uh we're working on it, and as soon as we can announce the availability of our iPad and iPhone software apps for the Ditto Cam and Rush 24-7, believe me, you will be the second to know.
I will be the first.
Because if I didn't know, nobody else would know.
Now we can go through the um.
I got a list of stories here from all over the place about the excessive scanning.
People seem to be all uh fired up at this one guy who shows up stripped down to his underwear.
All right, if you're gonna scream me, I'm gonna make it easy for you.
I'm gonna show up, here's my underwear.
And they make him put his clothes back on before they do the uh the pat down.
That story seems to have a lot of people uh interested and uh and and mesmerized.
Uh let's see.
We have a guy driving from Georgia to Indiana on the phone.
His name is uh Mike.
He's refusing to fly because of the scanners and the pat downs.
Is that right, Mike?
Welcome to the program.
Exceptionally average American dittoes, Rush.
Exceptionally average.
Thank you.
Yes, well, from the middle here.
I uh I was uh went to a conference.
I don't do this very often, uh, so it's not going to be the biggest blow to the airline industry, but I was watching the news, and uh I saw these uh there was the girl and there was the boy, and I imagined it was my four-year-old, and if I was sitting standing there watching that, I'd be in jail right now.
Yeah.
So uh on that principle on the basic principle of the government can stay as far the hell away from me as I can get them.
Uh I drove.
So are you en route?
I'm en route home now.
Over the weekend, and uh 12 hour drive, I've got about four left.
Well, the uh here comes uh I I think what you are illustrating is that this is the new normal.
This is how the regime operates.
Unemployment, 10% the new normal.
Indebtedness, higher taxes coming down the pike, the new normal.
They want to make these naked scanners the new normal.
Just another part of the new normal world in the stage and the age in the regime of Obama, like 10% unemployment, countless foreclosures and bankruptcies.
This is it, America.
This is your country.
I wonder how many people are driving long distances rather than flying.
We can only tabulate this with anecdotal information.
But you know, driving is far more dangerous.
Statistically, driving is far more dangerous than flying.
And uh this is all the result of terrorism.
People putting their lives at greater risk driving all these distances than uh than flying.
It is a um wait till the government figures out that people are uh are are figuring uh ways to bypass the scanners by driving.
You know, all Zawahiri would have to do is have some terrorists drive on an interstate, something can blow up, and now we got the government will stop cars.
People drive that's the way this is working, and they're a year behind everything that they're doing.
The Christmas bomber was last Christmas, the Times Square bomber was when?
It took them a year to get these scanners, took them a year to set them up, teach people how to operate them, and now they're trying to get people to go through them, and this is how they're doing it.
Well, um what it's supposed to get I'll the eyeball scanner.
Well, there might be a silver line here, eyeball scanners, biometric stuff.
There might at some point the people might demand psychological profiling again.
They might think, you know the hell with this.
Let's just start profiling people.
Start demanding it.
Not that the government would listen, but such is um is possible.
Anyway, the uh I don't know.
Well, here's here's the thing that well, I had a bunch of guys in town for the weekend.
Manual Rush Fest, the Yell Rushbo invitational.
And a couple of guys were flying home one way, first class, and they said we're targets.
If you have a one way ticket, your boarding pass gets some star on it, and the agent people know it, and you get Really inspected.
Frequent flyers with a lot of miles are the least hassled.
From what I have learned and from what I've been told.
And if, but if you buy a one-way ticket, terrorists don't care about landing.
I mean, the stupid idiots for all.
They show up at flight schools, they only want to learn how to take off.
And they give it away when they express no interest in landing.
Learning how to land it.
Here's women, woman says her Lambert, this is St. Louis, security screening with sexual assault.
Business traveler Penny Moroni flying home from St. Louis to Chicago, like all other airline passengers, she had to go through security.
When the metal in her artificial knees set off the detectors, she had to undergo more screening.
When she asked if she could go through a body scanner, she was told none were available.
Pat down was the only alternative.
She said her gloved hands touched my breasts, went between them, then she went into the top of my slacks, inserted her hands between my underwear and my skin, and then put her hands up on outside of my slacks and patted my genitals.
I was shaking and crying when I left the room, said Penny Moroni.
Under any other circumstances, if a person touched me like that without my permission, it would be considered criminal sexual assault.
Now, anybody who sets off metal detectors required to go through a physical pat down, but the TSA says they use a less aggressive touch for children under 12.
And the story here says the government's currently adding more body scanners at airports across the country.
Yep.
It's all starting to fall into place here.
I want to go back to this soundbite from Brian Ross at ABC News, who, you know, had a Mark Foley fetish back in those days.
The pages, the emails, and so forth.
Now, Brian Ross, this is a montage this morning, Good Morning America, on the uh TSA screening procedures.
There's something key in this I want to point out.
This is a tense time in the U.S. and in Europe where security officials privately admit they are scrambling to stop an expected terror attack of some kind somewhere soon.
From the airport pat downs in this country to a search for two suicide bombers believed to be at large now in Germany.
U.S. law enforcement officials say the twisted ingenuity of the Al-Qaeda bomb makers is a good part of the reason U.S. passengers are now getting pat-downs that they are using materials in their bombs that cannot be detected by all the expensive screening machines currently in place.
Haha!
Aha!
So Brian Ross said scanners cannot detect chemical explosives, hence the pat-downs.
Aha!
So the scanners don't pick up certain kinds of explosives.
Just for the record, folks, we here at uh EIB, our call screeners are always polite and courteous.
And Snerdly changes his rubber gloves after each pat down, after each call.
Nobody has ever complained about our screening procedures.
The surgeon Snerdley is a screener.
And uh I've had to suspend him once, but nobody is.
Do you remember when we were little kids?
Uh I don't know about you, but we uh little boys like to play doctor.
Uh and of course, uh girls with a nurse.
Remember those days.
Uh now little boys are gonna, you know, love to be playing TSA agents, and there's a story here in the stack.
Did I put it?
Did I take it out of the stack?
There's it's a New York Times strict as a game.
There's a game ah, here it is, Playmobile.
Hope I'm pronouncing this right.
P-L-A-Y-M-O-B-I-L.
It's a game.
Play mobile, play mobile.
Playmobile finds fun in the police state.
New York Times story, and they've got a picture here.
Playmobile security checkpoint toy set features armed guards at an airport screening point.
Playmobile toys depict real life settings and not always cheery ones like police station, hospital, and animal clinic, but one, the security checkpoint toy, took that philosophy too far for some parents.
The set, which includes armed airport security officers, a metal detector, and an X-ray screening machine, has drawn nearly 50 biting customer view reviews and scores of comments to those reviews on Amazon.com.
One Amazon reviewer said, I applaud Playmobil for attempting to provide us with the tools that we need to teach our children to unquestionably obey the commands of the state security apparatus.
But unfortunately, this product falls short of doing that.
There's no brown figure for little Josh to profile taser and detain, because all the characters here are white.
But I got a picture of it.
It is.
The whole premise behind Playmobil toys is to familiarize the child with the realities of life through play, said Ms. Winfrey, not Oprah.
This is Michelle Winfrey, the marketing manager for Playmobil USA.
If you're taking a child for a first flight to Florida from New Jersey to visit grandparents, you say, this is what the terminal looks like.
And when we get here, we have to take our shoes off and walk through security.
This is what's going to happen.
They've got a game for it.
They're going to have to expand it now.
So your kid, what a great Christmas present you can get.
You're going to play a mobile police state game where your kid can play sexual molestation under the Christmas tree.
Either on Christmas Eve or Christmas Day when your kid gets up.
Here it is.
Let me zoom in on the camera.
For those of you watching on the Ditto Cam, I will show you.
This is from the New York Times printed out.
And there it is.
There's the playmobile toy.
You have the screener, you have the scanner, the X-ray machine, uh, and you have the cop.
And the cop looks like carrying either magnifying glass or a bully club or what have you.
But there you have it.
And now this game can be expanded, will have to be expanded, ladies and gentlemen, to include the latest techniques that are used out there, which basically teach your kids sexual harassment under the tree on Christmas morning.
Now, continuing with the audio sound bites related to this, there was a terror trial verdict in New York.
Last Wednesday night, CBS evening news.
Now this slipped past most of the media, but it pretty big.
And I think this shows why we cannot allow terrorists to go to civilian trials, especially in New York.
You remember when the Khalid Sheikh Mohammed civilian trial was first proposed?
What did I?
Uh, your host suggest.
I said, You think it's automatic that they can't get a fair trial?
And you think there aren't some people in New York who hate America enough to find these guys not guilty.
Hell, just go to the Upper Westide.
You know, randomly pick people coming out of Zabars, and you'll find a jury that might acquit Khalid Sheikh Muhammad.
Certainly go down to the village in a number of places.
And now listen to this report.
This is uh CBS Evening News, a portion of correspondent Bob Orr's report about the verdict in the trial of Al Qaeda terrorist Ahmed Kalani.
Katie Curric said a major setback for the Obama regime and its attempts to show that terror suspects held at Guantanamo Bay can be tried successfully in civilian courts.
In what was seen as a test case, a federal jury here in New York today acquitted Ahmed Jelani of the most serious terrorism charges against him, convicting only on a lesser charge of conspiracy justice correspondent Bob Orr has the very latest on this developing story.
There's no doubt at all.
This is very bad news for the government.
Our CBS News security analyst Juan Zarati calls it, quote, a disaster.
This was to be a test case of sorts, as you mentioned, to prove that Guantanamo Bay detainees could be successfully prosecuted in civilian courts in the U.S. But the jury now has found Ahmed Gaylani not guilty on all but one of the major terror counts against him.
Not guilty on four counts of conspiring with Al Qaeda in the U.S. Embassy bombings back in 1998 In Tanzania and Kenya.
Also, he was found not guilty on 224 murder counts.
This obviously could have a huge impact on any future plans to try Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and the other 9-11 conspirators for now.
They remain at Gitmo, and with this verdict, in all likelihood, they will remain there for the foreseeable future.
Oh, really?
Oh, they will.
You mean Obama really wants a conviction here?
Holder wants a conviction.
Whether they get convicted or not, these guys are going to get years to bash this country from a New York courtroom.
But here you have it, 220.
Well, actually, 284 counts acquitted.
Two hundred New York jury.
As predicted by me, your host, L. Rushbo.
They uh talked to Peter King, Congressman from New York, who said.
How this evil terrorist could be acquitted of 284 counts, including hundreds of counts of murder.
And only convicted on one count is uh shows the absolute insanity of having these civilian trials in the first place.
This is a terrible defeat for the Obama administration.
Everybody thinks it is.
Well, I don't hear them belly aching.
Did uh did Holder call a press conference and act like he was outraged over this?
You'll be...
Wait a second.
Holder's spokesman said that the verdict showed why it was the right thing to do.
It was a victory for the United States and our justice system that this guy was acquitted on 284 counts.
Oh, I found guilty on one count.
Victory for the United States.
Eric Holder's spokesman.
Well, there you have it.
That's even worse.
That means the full breadth of my prediction was true.
Well, here's Hillary on Meet the Press Sunday morning, David Gregory.
A lot of uncertainty in the criminal justice system.
As you well know, as a lawyer civilian case, my question is, are we committed with these terror suspects that if they are acquitted, that they should be released?
Well, no, and don't forget, we're not going to be able to do that.
Then why then why hold up the American system is the right route if you're not going to release them?
That's what the American system says you have to do.
But David, first of all, our system is the best system in the world.
We all know that.
It is good enough and strong enough to either convict and sentence the guilty or even execute where appropriate, and where you can't convince an American jury, which is certainly obsessed with terrorism.
Maybe there's a question about the strength of the case.
And I think what we are trying to do is get the best result consistent with our laws and constitution.
Now, whether by accident or by design, Gregory asked a pretty good question.
Well, why if if you're not going to release them, then why do this?
And Bobby Gindle said the same thing.
He was on Meet the Press.
And Gregory said, You think uh you think President Bush just got lucky with this?
Go back to the Miranda rights for the underwear bomber.
What evidence do they need?
He I mean, they caught him with a device.
What was the purpose?
You asked a great question to the Secretary Clinton.
Why are we doing these civilian trials if they're not going to release them?
Why are we compromising sources?
But here's the second point.
You look at some of President Obama's writings.
You look at how he talks about, well, we need to understand the the disadvantaged backgrounds.
This is a matter of social justice and more foreign aid.
Nonsense.
The analysts have looked at the terrorists that are coming at us.
The disproportionate share are educated, come from privileged backgrounds.
The reality is this isn't about people who don't have enough jobs, who don't have enough social aid.
This is about fighting an enemy that hates our way of life.
Yeah, why try them if we're not going to release them?
What's the point of the trial?
Well, sadly, we know what the point of the trial is.
We want people to stand up in court and indict the United States.
For the world of and this is how Obama proved to the world that we're so strong, that we're so good and decent that we'll gladly have our country raked over the coals by our enemies.
We have no compunction about letting them go free.
Putting them on trial and having them acquitted.
That's how great a country we are.
Remember, as far as Obama and Reverend Wright, so this is a guilty nation.
We gotta pay the price for all of our transgressions over the course of our existence.
Saudis Galani trials a show trial.
Pure and simply a show trial.
The only question is what is the show?
You know, back in the Nazi days, Estlus days, there were show trials frequently.
All over the place.
But there was never any doubt if the people in those trials were ever going to be released.
Same thing here.
So what's the show?
In fact, in this in this in this particular trial, one of the key witnesses was not allowed to testify because the prosecution only learned about the witness during the CIA's interrogation of Galani.
It was a Clinton appointed judge, and that judge ruled that permitting the testimony would have violated the terrorist Fifth Amendment rights.
So this was This is just all it's a show trial and for what and for who is the question.
How are you, Mr. Limbaugh?
And I thank you for allowing me to vent my anger.
Uh this is on the much lighter side.
It's about the view from the far far left, hefty lefty, Joy Beho.
Um they're allowing her to accuse the Tea Party of cheating.
And we are the informed public, and we know that the Tea Party is too principled to cheat on anything.
Well, Joy World show.
Wait a second now.
Joy Joy Beho?
Yes.
Wait, what no she's accusing the Tea Party of cheating at what?
At cheating at a silly dance show.
Oh, oh, dancing with the stars.
We're talking about dancing with the stars here.
Disgusted with her.
She gets away with this all the time.
She just makes statements.
No one accused accuses back that she's lying.
And I believe that she's allowing her own latent pension for deceit to color her opinions.
But we're demanding an open apology from her to the Tea Party.
Hey, Beho shut up.
That's that's our answer.
Demanding an apology to the Tea Party from Joy Beho.
And please, by her standards, did the NAACP vote in the little fat black dancer.
She's horrible.
She didn't say a word about that.
I think that she's just so far left.
Wait a minute.
The little if she was on a mountain, she'd be falling off.
You really got it in for Joy Behoe.
Oh, I'm telling you.
I can't even stomach the show.
My sister watches it.
I says, I can't look at her.
I can't.
Well, why you mean she makes it?
And just disgustingly tearing people down.
Uh, we're just we're disgusted with her.
I wish that they could get someone on there.
Uh all they care about give us two conservatives and two lefties.
They're you are illustrating why they're not going to get rid of Joy Beho.
You are talking about her.
Well, that's That's all they care about.
You're talking about her.
But that's not it.
We're saying she's a liar.
She just makes it up as she goes.
She's not funny.
She's a liberal.
Of course she's a liar.
Show me the honest one.
Goodness sake.
I I'm just I can't watch her.
Well, don't.
Then that's the answer.
Don't.
I don't.
There's a channel changer.
There's a remote control.
I do not.
Well, good for you.
But if there's a conservative on there, and we can help, we do.
And we are actually standing up for the Tea Party.
Now you're talking about dancing with the She's going back and forth from Joyce Behoy's show to the dancing with the stars.
You're not talking about dancing with the stars.
No, no.
We're talking about her and her attitude towards anything that she apparently doesn't understand.
If if it isn't uh, like I said, her late nature.
You need to be a little bit more compassionate.
Joy Beho is just not happy.
You're looking at you're you're you're looking at an intrinsically miserable woman, which is Absolutely.
The explanation for this.
She's unhappy with a lot of things.
Uh And I know her.
She just one of these people happily miserable.
Yes.
But ask her about the NAACP vote for the little fat black man because he can't dance.
What is this little flat who are you talking about here?
Little fat black.
There's a there's uh I don't okay, I don't watch them.
I told you I get this from my own.
Well, what are we now that one little fat black man is on the Joy Beho show?
I can't keep track of where you're going.
She's jumping back and forth from show to show.
You probably you talk about dancing with the stars.
Yes.
There's uh that's Kyle Macy Racks fellow, didn't you?
That's Kyle, it's Kyle Macy, and thank God somebody's talking about his poor little guy.
Nobody's talking about him.
They're all talking about Jennifer Gray, they're talking about Brandy, they're all talking about uh about uh Bristol Palin.
Nobody's talking about Kyle Macy.
It's not fair.
Kyle Macy, he has had some of the most fun dance routines on this show.
He really has.
I wouldn't be surprised if he won it, although you know what's gonna happen.
You just know what's gonna happen tonight.
You just know.
It was Newsweek that did the it was it was Isakov, right?
Did the Quran in the uh in the uh in the uh toilet story, right?
Now they've got a cover out there, their latest cover depicts Obama as Lord Shiva.
And it is a really upset some Indian Americans.
He's on Newsweek's cover as a god of practically everything.
▲
Export Selection