All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 19, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:38
October 19, 2010, Tuesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Brian, how long is it going to take you to put that video card in and get this new monitor up and running?
Good.
I'm staying here to watch it.
One of the reasons it hasn't worked up till now is because I haven't been here.
Snurdly, you can go.
I'm going to stay here and watch it.
Hey, welcome back.
Great to have you here.
Rushlin boss serving humanity simply by showing up.
It's getting bad in Delaware.
Michelle Morkin has the story.
And as I say, I read something today I just knew could not be true.
I just knew it couldn't be true.
ISIS people are calling.
I know I interviewed him for the newsletter.
That's why this quote seems so strange in this uh in this Wall Street Journal piece.
The ICE's uh I guess he's uh getting calls from you people.
The Wall Street Journal quotes him as saying that voters want Republicans to compromise with the Democrats.
And I interviewed him for Yeah, well, I interviewed him for the newsletter.
He didn't say anything like this.
Does he want to get on the air?
Well, schedule it.
Schedule it.
Schedule it for the second half of this hour.
But well, the second segment of this hour.
If you can, find out when he can do it.
We'll bend and it's popping.
Anyway, back to Delaware here.
I'm reading this story today, and it makes it out like Christine O'Donnell did not know that the First Amendment forbids the establishment of religion by government.
I said, My first reaction when I read it was to Calson.
I said, What the hell is this?
And I said, This can't be.
I'm not going to call anybody.
This has to be an out-and-out lie.
Here's here's a partial soundbite from a debate this morning in Wilmington at the at Widener Law School during a during the debate.
Uh blah blah blah blah blah.
It's a discussion of evolution and creationism.
Uh after uh after Kuhn's said private and parochial schools are free to teach creationism, but that religious doctrine doesn't belong in public schools.
Christine O'Donnell and Koons had this exchange about the separation of church and state.
Where in the Constitution is separation of church and state.
It's in excellent point.
Hold on.
The First Amendment establishes the separation, the fact that the federal government shall not establish any religion.
Could you replay the bite?
I need to hear the whole bite.
Somebody interrupted me during the replay the bite.
Here's what Christine O'Donnell said.
Where in the Constitution is separation of church and state.
It's in excellent point.
Hold on.
The First Amendment establishes the separation, the fact that the federal government shall not establish any religion.
And she said you telling me that's in the First Amendment.
What she meant was, are you telling me separation of church and states in the First Amendment?
It's not.
Christine O'Donnell was absolutely correct.
The First Amendment says nothing about the separation of church and state.
This is a modern and incorrect description of the prohibition of the establishment of a national religion, pure and simple.
And the left has taken this to say that religious people cannot be in government.
And that you can't teach something like creation in the schools while you can teach evolution.
Because evolution isn't religion, but creationism is.
A religion evolution isn't.
Yet both require faith, because neither can be proved as a explanation of where all this came from.
Nobody can prove where this came from.
You can't say that we evolve from nothing.
And the anti-creationists don't want to believe that there's a God with intelligent, efficient design, all that.
She was not saying she didn't know that government shall not establish a religion.
So there that's that's the bite.
You heard the laughter.
Now Michelle Morkin has a different take.
Chris Kuhn's cannot name the five freedoms in the First Amendment.
This is what's not being reported.
Delaware Democrat Senate candidate Chris Kuhnz cannot name the five freedoms in the First Amendment.
All you'll hear from the state control media today is that Christine O'Donnell correctly questioned Kuhn's claim that the phrase the separation of church and state appears in the First Amendment.
Kuhn's ignorance doesn't fit the O'Donnell Basher's narrative, so they'll pretend that this didn't happen.
And here's the story.
Delaware GOP Senate nominee Christine O'Donnell questioned on Tuesday whether the Constitution provides for the separation of church and state.
The comment came during a debate on WDEL radio with Democrat opponent Chris Kuhn's, who argued that local schools should teach science rather than religion.
At which point O'Donnell jumped in, where in the Constitution is the separation of church and state.
The audience at Widener Law School was taken aback with shouts of wool and laughter coming from the crowd.
Kuhnz then pointed to the First Amendment, which states Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.
O'Donnell says, You're telling me the First Amendment does.
Following the next question, Coons revisited the remark, thinking he had caught O'Donnell in a flub, saying, I think you've just heard from my opponent in her asking where is the separation of church and state show that she has a fundamental misunderstanding.
O'Donnell again said, That's in the First Amendment.
Kuhn said yes.
O'Donnell was later able to score some points of her own off the remark, revisiting the issue to ask Kuhnz if he could identify the five freedoms guaranteed in the First Amendment.
Kuhn's named separation of church and state, but could not identify the others.
Freedom of speech, press, to assemble and petition.
And then asked O'Donnell, allow the moderators to ask the questions.
I guess he can't, O'Donnell said.
So when he got caught with his own intellectual pants down, he ran to the moderator for cover.
All she was saying was the Constitution doesn't say anything about separation of church.
Listen to the Bitagin, because the scary thing here is that the audience laughed.
That's the scary thing.
The scary thing at a law school, the scary thing is that a bunch of idiots laughed at the notion that the Constitution doesn't say separation of church and state.
Here's the bite again.
It's number 31.
Where in the Constitution is separation of church and state.
It's in excellent point.
Hold on.
The First Amendment establishes the separation.
The fact that the federal government shall not establish any religion.
That's not in the Constitution.
Separation, church and state, is not in the Constitution.
And the fact that people laughed about this is what's really scary.
Most of the framers and the Congressmen who were first elected to the House and Senate prayed every day and went to church in Congress on Sundays.
And in fact, the House is opened every day with a prayer.
Apparently, back in the day, the founders didn't know that there was separation of church and state.
All the founders said was that the state shall not establish an official religion.
It does not say that people in government shall not practice or cannot practice a religion.
The Senate opens with a prayer every day, as does the House.
The House has a chaplain for crying out loud.
So this story purposely written to make it look like Christine O'Donnell does not know what's in the First Amendment when she was right.
Nowhere in the Constitution will you find the word separation of church and state, and nowhere in the Constitution will you find anything written to convey the meaning that religion is not permitted to be part of government.
All it says is that the government shall not establish one.
The United States government cannot proclaim this is a Christian nation.
Cannot proclaim this is a Jewish state, cannot proclaim the official religion of our country is Islam.
They cannot do it.
But we can have Islamists in government.
We can have Christians in government, we have Jews in government, and they can pray while serving.
This is this has been one of the tricks of the left for as long as I've been alive.
To get God out of our culture, to get God out of the schools, to get God out of everyday life.
So try to say that the Constitution prohibits God.
That's what they want the interpretation of First Amendment to be.
The Constitution does not prohibit God.
I mean, for crying out loud, look at the declaration, acknowledged as one of our founding documents.
We are all created.
Endowed by our creator.
The reason for this phrase in the First Amendment was where were these people fleeing?
England.
The Church of England, Henry VIII established a religious wing.
He gets divorced.
Pure and simple.
He wanted to get a divorce.
Religion said no.
Okay, I'm going to make my own religion.
Screw you.
And I'm going to behead somebody.
Screw you.
They were fleeing religious persecution.
The scary thing is that a bunch of dumb cough Dingleberry law students, an audience at a law school, laughed at the correct portrayal of what's in the Constitution.
Christine O'Donnell may be as stupid as Justice Scalia.
We don't want to he said about it.
Justice Scalia.
In holding that the establishment clause prohibits invocations and benedictions at public school graduation ceremonies.
The court with nary a mention that it is doing so lays waste a tradition that is as old as public school graduation ceremonies themselves, and that is a component of an even more long-standing American tradition of non-sectarian prayer to God at public celebrations generally.
As its instrument of destruction, the bulldozer of its social engineering, the court invents a boundless and boundlessly manipulable test of psychological coercion.
That is Justice Scalio writing about people amplifying the establishment clause to suggest that God can't be mentioned, that prayers cannot happen at public graduations.
That was Justice Scalia writing about those on the Supreme Court who would rule that God could not be part of anything to do with government or anything public.
The Constitution doesn't say it.
Christine O'Donnell was right.
Chris Coons couldn't name the five freedoms enumerated in the First Amendment.
Christine O'Donnell is well does she Snerdley says that Christine O'Donnell's not slick.
She doesn't know how to say it to get past these uh connivers and SOBs in the media.
I guess not if you want to look at it.
She's simply a guy says, Well, the First Amendment says uh establishment uh church and state.
You telling me that's in the first she knows full well it's not.
She's not, it's not that she's not slick enough.
She's assuming that everybody's as smart as she is.
She's assuming that everybody's as informed as she is.
That's the mistake many of us conservatives make.
We assume everybody knows what we know.
We assume everybody is as informed as we are.
That's why I say it was really scary that these lame brains at that law school laughed at the absolute correct assertion that she made.
And we're back, Rush Limbaugh, the cutting edge, societal evolution.
Our telephone number 800 282-2882 will get back to your phone calls in a moment.
First up, uh Congressman Darrell Issa from California, Congressman.
Welcome to the EIB network, sir.
Well, Rush, thanks.
Thanks for the opportunity to uh to clarify what uh what a half hour of an interview turns into when it turns into one bullet line by uh an author.
Well, let me tell you what it says.
The whole story is about you guys uh uh wanting to shut down government and how that won't work.
It's all about how Republicans really in private realize they're going to have to compromise with Obama, and you get quoted.
It's pretty clear the American people expect us to use the existing gridlock to create compromise to advance their agenda that way.
They want us to come together with the administration after we agree to disagree.
That's what they quote you as saying.
Well, certainly to me, we're gonna have to fund our military.
We're going to have to make sure that we have an active role in uh uh in overseeing this president in so many ways that he is up until now uh just ignored.
He's told his own party don't look, and he's told uh my party that we have no right to see.
So uh it's going to be acrimonious, there's no question, but it's also gonna be an opportunity to get this country in the right direction again.
Uh you know, when we ran the table uh having the House, the Senate, and the White House, uh, we still didn't achieve our Republican principles to a level that I'm satisfied with, and uh I don't expect this president to uh be a born-again Republican, but I certainly would like him to uh to recognize that he's been running us into ruin.
Well, do you ex what do you expect him to do that?
You expect the president to come to you and say, okay, you know, you guys won and I lost, and uh, guess the American people are rejecting me.
I guess I'm gonna have to work with you.
You expect him to do that?
No, I expect him to take a little while to figure out that uh the Presidential Records Act means they can no longer use Google uh to do politicking inside the White House in violation of the law.
They can no longer ignore the hatch act violations they've been doing, they can no longer do uh Sestack Romanoff type uh deals with uh federal taxpayers' dollars.
I expect those changes to happen.
Uh and you know, there'll be a certain degree of gridlock as the president adjusts to the fact that uh he has been uh uh one of the most corrupt presidents uh in modern times.
He has ignored the very laws that he said were so vital uh when he was a senator, uh, and you know, he's gonna have to come back a dr uh direction.
Now, at the end of the day, John Boehner is gonna have to figure out how we have a budget and uh and appropriations.
In my case, I had the committee uh that's all about making sure that the administration obeys the law, that waste fraud and abuse not be tolerated, which obviously is not the case now, but that's that's the change that's gonna happen for my committee and I'm looking forward to it.
Let me extrain to you why people were calling your office all upset.
Um the people that are going to secure the Republican victory look at Barack Obama as somebody who is destroying their country.
He is not somebody to be compromised with, somebody who needs to be stopped.
Uh they know that you're not going to have the ability to get him to agree with your legislation.
He can override uh any of your vetoes.
You're you're you're not gonna be able to override his vetoes.
But they the idea that that uh uh you're gonna end up working with him is an ephema.
The the people want this man stopped.
That's why this uh profound turnout is going to happen.
Uh the idea that you know, work with him on a budget, uh we want him defeated.
We want he and nobody expects him to move in your direction.
We expect him to try to get around you with executive orders to try to ignore you to further his agenda, whatever, however he has to, to continue doing what he's doing to the country.
And that's basically restructuring it and destroying the private sector, destroying the job creating sector, and people are gonna elect you in droves and record numbers to stop that.
Well, and we're going to stop it.
Uh first we stop Nancy Pelosi from being speaker, which allows us to say nothing shall come to the House floor uh unless, in fact, it has uh Republican principles behind it.
But even more so, you hit the nail on the head.
This president's gonna try to use executive orders, he's gonna extend past it.
My committee's number one responsibility is to make sure that the administration obeys its laws.
Government oversight is going to be vigorous.
I'm gonna increase the number of committees uh and we're going subcommittees, and we're going to make sure that this administration starts playing by the rules.
We're also gonna take on some of the uh things that are probably uh legitimately been dragging on since the last administration.
You know, when we went after Sestact, we had people from the Bush administration tell us, well, that's always happened.
Well, it's not gonna happen on my watch when we get the majority, it's gotta stop.
American taxpayer dollars, uh, and I realize there's non-discretionary problems, but the discretionary dollars are being used to corrupt America's basic uh direction and values.
So uh that is what we're going To do.
There's going to be no compromise on moving to Republican principles.
There's certainly going to be no compromise on how the House is run.
We've had four years of Nancy Pelosi having only closed rules and no debate.
And John Boehner has promised open debate, but I'll tell you it's a good thing.
But wait, wait, wait, Congressman.
The people don't care about how the House runs.
They don't care about open debate.
They don't they care about stopping Obama and the Democrats.
They care about saving the country.
They don't care if Obama goes to jail.
They don't care if if if Axel Run goes to jail, they want them stopped.
They want them to have no power.
They don't, they're not saying let's talk about how to do it in a way where we both get what we want.
They want Obama stopped.
They want to save their country.
They don't care what Boehner's going to do with the rules of the House.
They don't care how they're going to get even with Pelosi.
They don't care that Pelosi isn't going to be there.
It's Obama and the Democrats in Toto stopped.
It's not more complicated than that.
And Rush, we will stop them.
We haven't had the power to stop them, but we will stop them.
And the fact is we've got to be different than we were the last time.
Uh when I led the charge against TARP, I was threatened six ways from Sunday because it was the Bush administration that wanted that large amount of walking around money based on things they said they were going to do they didn't do.
So it's it's not just stopping Obama, which is critical.
It's stopping a Washington that in some cases was wrong-minded before Obama got there to get a bigger job there.
Exactly right.
But it's it's it's it's it's very fundamental and simple.
What the what the American people see the Democrats doing, and in fact, all of the ruling class of Washington doing is taking away their opportunity for fiscal responsibility, economic prosperity, and turning that over to the government.
They want that stopped, and that's what they think electing Republicans will accomplish.
I I'm glad you called.
I appreciate the opportunity to clarify this.
Sadly out of time.
Congressman Darrell Issa, California.
We'll be back.
Thanks again to Congressman Issa for calling to explain or clarify this uh point about uh compromise.
Uh uh let me let me try to explain this a different way.
Because I I thought it's very telling when Congressman Isis said, no, no, we're gonna change the way things are Boehner is going to open up the house, we're gonna have the right rules in the House, whereas Pelosi hasn't allowed to de debate uh the shut us up.
We're gonna allow the we don't want debate.
We wouldn't mind if we shut the Democrats out like they've shut us out.
We're gonna have to stop them.
This is serious that we're talking about the United States of America, not Washington the political process and how things happen there.
We're talking about the country.
We'd be fine if there wasn't any debate.
We win, you lose, we're changing things.
That's the debate.
It's over with.
We got none to debate you with.
You're wrong.
Pure and simple.
I don't want to hear how you only want to destroy the country in ten years instead of twenty-five.
I want to want to hear this.
We will have one.
The Tea Party sees that the government is metastasizing.
They see that it's gonna kill the country.
They want it stopped.
This is a m this is stopped and then reversed.
You don't want to hear about ways to slow down and rules changes and all this kind of stuff.
It's uh really it's not all that complicated.
Just stop them.
I know a lot of people we can't stop them, Rush.
Elected Republicans will say.
We're not gonna have the power because Obama will be able to override our veto.
We all understand that.
But you have to start trying.
You have this is about 2012 and beyond.
This is about validating why you were elected in the first place.
The effort has got to be made to stop this.
We are not and don't want to become a socialist country.
Keep educating.
Keep explaining why you won.
Let us know you know why you won, and how you're gonna keep doing things to secure victory in 2012 and 2014, 2016 and beyond.
Because that's what it's going to take.
We've heard from uh Congressman McConnell's office.
I don't know where people get these ideas.
This is a note, but we have not had any secret meetings with donors to tell them we are not for the repeal of Obamacare.
Senator McConnell has voted for repeal and will vote again that way.
His position on the issue is simply not in dispute.
So we don't know where people getting these ideas of secret meetings with donors to tell them we're not for repeal.
It's not happening.
So that's from McConnell's office.
I just want to get all this stuff out when the um they want to respond to react to what's said or happens on the uh on the program fine.
But I I really've talked to enough of them that it's it's a question mark in my mind as to whether they fully really understand what this election is about, what the uprising is about, what the whole force of the Tea Party is.
Anyway, back to the phones.
You people have been extremely patient while all this has been going on.
We'll go to Tampa.
This is Charles.
I've been on hold for quite a while.
I appreciate it.
Thank you much for waving.
Thank you, sir.
I think we uh have no uh compromise whatsoever.
Send Democrats to the pits of hell as far as I'm concerned.
How you do that?
Well, you shred the health care uh fast assembly of the health care bill in a shredder on T national TV.
You make the Bush tax cuts permanent, east small business taxes, secure our border with troops and law enforcement, and make the Democrats a small blip in the annals of history.
All right.
Cool.
Fine and in.
I just wanted you to specify the issues.
Because when you say you want to consign some people to hell, people might get the wrong idea about that.
So thank you for spelling it out.
You're right on the bunny.
Uh when it when it comes to the issue.
Here's the bottom line for you Republicans, if you control the House, there shouldn't be any legislation Obama wants.
None.
Zero.
Zip, zero, nada.
If you control the House, and if you're the opposition player, there's not one thing that he should agree with that you propose.
And if there is, it's a problem.
Okay, Rush, well, what happens if they propose a social security fix that doesn't require tax increases?
Well, I gotta see more than that before I can respond to something like that, but um.
I don't know.
I I there's enough going on here that leads me to believe that there is an effort not to understand what the Tea Party is about.
There's enough going on that leads me to believe that they don't really want to understand or deal with the issues that are going to result in Republican victory.
And I think a lot of it is it's gonna be hard work.
I mean, you roll up your sleeves every day to roll this stuff back.
It's it is gonna be hard work because these people aren't gonna stop.
Obama's not going to stop.
Obama's not going to stop.
Well, even the big tent.
Yeah, I guess you know if you mean by big tent and moderates and pro-choicers in there and uh and all that.
But the problem with their Big Ten is they don't want the Tea Party in it.
The problem with the Republican Big Ten is they don't want the Tea Party in it because Tea Party's not sophisticated enough.
They haven't read the right books.
They haven't been to the right universities.
Or what have you.
Diane in Sarasota, Florida.
Hi, and welcome to the EIB network.
Nice to have you with us.
Thank you very much, Ross.
Uh, what I'm calling about, uh, my husband and I are beginning members of the Tea Party, and we certainly do not want compromise, and I don't want to hear reaching across the aisle anymore.
But I'm also suspicious of political.com and political.
Uh I just wonder if there's some plan possibly out of the White House uh amongst the media to put some doubts in our minds that that we're not going to have as much control, try to split the Republican Party.
Well, wait a minute.
There's no question third party.
There is no question that two weeks for the election, the media does stories that are designed to deflate you and us and to try to uh tamp down our enthusiasm and so forth.
And there's no question that there's an element of that in in this story.
However, I'm just going to tell you I have talked to Republicans, Diane, who have said to me, we're not going to have control.
We're not going to have that much power.
I I have talked, I have talked to Republicans who have who have asked me to pass on to you that don't have all these high expectations.
I've talked to them.
So the politico is not entirely wrong.
I think that the timing of the story is exactly as you say.
It's designed to depress turnout.
It's going to do just the opposite.
It's going to ramp up turnout.
Oh, I hope so.
Oh, don't doubt it.
And also that we in a Tea Party, we don't stop in uh 2010.
That's just the beginning.
And we're going to hold all of those Republicans responsible to stop what has happened over the last two years and even what happened before that.
We're not going away.
It's not just Republicans.
It's whole Washington.
Yeah, absolutely.
And we we want to reverse it.
It's been going on for a very long time, but it's much worse under Obama.
And uh but again, I don't trust anything that comes out of politico.com.
Uh uh Mike Allen that started it, as you know, uh started from the Washington Post and Time magazine, and he's to the left of Lenin.
And I hear him on the radio, and he's still a big Obama supporter and a big Obama administration supporter.
So that's why I just wanted to say I don't believe his polls uh because I don't believe anything comes out of that publication.
All right, Diane, thanks for the call.
Appreciate it.
Um look, I I I know that the political thinks they're throwing cold water.
That's what they're trying to accomplish.
Right?
They're trying to throw cold water.
The problem is that Americans are so boiling mad that there ain't enough cold water to throw on us.
They're not gonna tamp down the election turnout, and they're not gonna tamp down expectations.
It's just gonna add to the volume.
All the cold water they throw is just gonna add to the whole volume of water that's boiling, all the effervescence that's boiling out there.
Plain and simple.
Uh my friends, a 44-year-old oceanside man, already in jail on suspension of burglarizing his neighbor's home, is now suspected in more than 100 smash and grab business break-ins and 50 identity theft cases over the past six months.
Over the past six months, Oceanside Police said that somebody's been breaking windows or glass doors to get into businesses.
Uh this California, Oceanside Vista Carlsbad Escondido.
The burglar would quickly grab cash and credit card receipts and leave.
And then would start rebuilding people's identities in his name with their credit card information.
Identity theft.
Yet another in an endless string of stories detailing how it happens.
And one of these stories, one of these days, is going to include you unless you get life luck.
When it comes to protecting your identity, nobody else does the job life lock does.
There's nobody else to consider.
They protect your information and they won't sell it like some other companies do, and they have LifeLock does the best identity alert system there is.
Costs hardly anything, and you get it even cheaper with the mention of my name, 10% off.
Life Lock's number is 800-440-4833.
And if you mention offer code Rush, again, you save 10%.
Lifelock 800-440-4833.
Yeah, I'm looking at the audio soundbite roster.
It's such a great soundbite roster today, but uh, as is uh always the case, and I explained to people, it's the people in watching the show last week, and they well, how do you prepare this?
Uh getting the prep schedule and so forth.
But I said, basically, this is improv.
There's no producer, and there's no script, and there's nothing I have to do at X because somebody's expecting it like it is on television.
And we don't do retakes.
Uh and so it just flows.
And today is a great example.
Um we got a great audio soundbite roster, and I haven't gotten there, but two sound bites up, maybe even one, the Christine O'Donnell, and she wasn't even on the original one.
So, I don't know.
I I want to keep today's soundbite roster for tomorrow.
And uh incorporate it with whatever we have tomorrow that I don't know about yet.
Meanwhile, in Washington, there will be meetings conceived this afternoon and tonight about the limbaugh problem.
Then we deal with the limbaugh problem.
So there's a lot happening here that we have to deal with on the fly as it uh as it happens from the political early vote of bad omen for Reed in Nevada's prime swing county.
Republicans are significantly outpacing Democrats in early vote turnout.
This, according to official statistics, a potential sign of difficulty for Harry Reed.
As he attempts to rally his base for his tough contest with Republican Sharon Angle.
Now, we'll see.
I'm sure the fraud and cheating is also begun out there.
There's a story I also have in the stack that early voting all over the country, white males are showing up in droves, which you know how that's going to be portrayed.
And of course, isn't it uh profiling to notice this?
Columbia, South Carolina.
Hi, Jack.
Welcome to the Rush Limbaugh program.
Nice to have you with us.
Hey, former Air Force dead Jeep owning, so special needs parent.
Thank you for agreeing with me, ditto's rush.
Well, thanks for the call, sir.
Um, bipartisanship is what got us into this mess, and partisanship is the only thing that's gonna get us out.
When we started busting our morals and going against the Constitution, this country has taken a downward turn, and I'm ready for some partisanship.
I'm ready for some good knuckle banging in the Senate and the House and overturning all these social programs.
They're leading us straight to communism.
We need to go back to capitalism, and we need to go back to the Constitution.
Those guys were smarter than we are, and if it's not in there, why are we doing it?
Well, it's it's clear that there are a lot of things that need to be on the agenda.
You know, the House rules are not one of them.
Stopping the spending is.
Uh we don't need debate.
That's a great way to put it.
We don't need to what do we need to debate these guys?
The debate is the election that's going to be solved.
Hell, these guys aren't even running on their agenda.
How in the world do you debate these clowns?
They aren't even running on their agenda.
The Democrats are not out there saying, re-elect us, look what we did for you.
They're running away from it.
How the world do you debate these people?
These people are made to order right now to be defeated.
Like Obama says, we need to get ready for hand-to-hand combat.
That's what he said this was going to be.
He's not moving in our direction.
The debate is over.
The Democrats will not even show up.
The Democrats, they can't get them to.
They're having to buy 'em off.
In it some in Cincinnati, there's a story today that they're taking kids out of school on field trips, high school kids, and giving them cupcakes and cookies and teaching them how to vote Democrat.
Yeah, it's somewhere buried in the stack here.
I got a I got a whole show we didn't get to today.
This show boomeranged off of essentially two stories today.
The political story about how the uh Republicans uh really uh not crazy about repealing stuff, and the second story is how Republicans realize they're gonna have to compromise.
So basically two stories.
The debate's over.
The Democrats will not show up.
Pure and simple.
I mean, look at look at the debates they're having.
They won't show, they have to have seven or eight other people on the stage with them.
And they uh they call it a debate.
As Obama said, this is what elections are for.
Elections solve the debate.
And that's what's gonna happen two weeks from today.
Now, I obviously did not get to this today, But I am going to get to this tomorrow.
Because this intrigues me.
And what intrigues me, I talk about it.
Try this headline.
Jeff Fisher, he's a coach of the Tennessee Titans.
Jeff Fisher, ESPN, asked coaches to take timeouts late on Monday night.
Now the game was a blowout.
ESPN asked the coaches to take timeouts late in the game.
There was a playoff game of Yankees and the Texas Strangers at the same time.
Got to comment on this.
Got to comment on it.
We'll do it tomorrow.
▲
Export Selection