All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 16, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:31
September 16, 2010, Thursday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
You know, there's an interesting point out there.
By the way, I heard National Review did review the Zeb Chaffetz book.
The Weekly Standard didn't.
None of the conservative columnists did.
Which didn't surprise me.
I'm just answering Snerdley's question.
They just, I pretend I don't exist.
That's the easiest way to deal with me.
I'm just really not here.
Hi, how are you, folks?
800-282-2882.
If you want to be on the Rush Limbaugh program, the email address is lrushbow at EIBnet.com.
So there she is, second day in a row, Andrea Mitchell, NBC News, Washington.
She's over in Tehran.
She is interviewing Mahmoud Achini Zod.
And she's over there wearing, what, a headscarf.
And Snerdley had an interesting observation.
American women, particularly newswomen, when they hit over there, they observe every sexist, bigoted custom in these Islamic countries.
And in our country, they tell us to go to hell.
Now, Andrea, there she is right now, not quite a burqa, but headscarf.
I wonder if Ahmedini Zad knows that she's Jewish.
She knows that she is.
She knows what Ahmedini Zod thinks of her.
And yet there's over there kowtowing.
I remember when Mike Wallace, remember this?
Some of you people will be too young to remember this.
Mike Wallace interviewed the Ayatollah Homeani on 60 Minutes, kept Imam.
Imam, the way we address Obama now, Imam.
And he'd ask him the question.
I mean, as deferential as you could be.
And he'd come back to a press conference here with Ronaldus Magnus, Jimmy Carter.
Hey, you stupid jerk.
And then ask the question.
Have you, folks, there's something significant that happened out there.
Carla, is it Bruni or Brunei?
How did the First Lady of France?
How does she pronounce her last name?
B-R-U-N-I.
It doesn't matter.
She's written a book.
And in the book, she lets the cat out of the bag that Michelle Obama hates being First Lady.
Hates the job.
Michelle Obama, this is from the UK Daily Mail.
Michelle Obama thinks being America's first lady is hell.
Carla Bruni, or Brunei, reveals today in a wildly indiscreet new book.
Ms. Brunei reveals that Mrs. Obama replied when asked about her position as the president's wife, don't ask.
It's hell.
I can't stand it.
Well, I got a suggestion then.
I don't know if she can't stand him, can't stand being the president's wife, doesn't like being first lady.
Details of the private conversation which took place at the White House during an official visit by Sarkozy last March emerged in Carla and the Ambitious, a book written in collaboration with Ms. Brunei.
Now, you will not see, you will not see one domestic U.S. news network or service covering this story, which tells me how big it is.
The media is going to ignore this like conservative people ignore me.
They're just going to ignore it.
They're going to leave it across the pond.
tells me this is a big story.
Now then the next thing is, why would Carla Brunei do this?
Why be this indiscreet?
Why let this kind of cat out of the bag?
Why publish a book that says Muchel Obama thinks the job is hell?
Now if it's true, this would go a long way in explaining the endless string of lavish vacations and parties.
You know, I have postulated for the longest time that they're out of the White House so much he is.
I don't think they like it.
I think the White House to them is not a positive historical place.
I think they look at the White House where a lot of really bad stuff was decided and bad stuff happened.
And I don't think they like being there.
And I actually think that it's that White House to them is if I were president, I'd never leave the place.
I'd be so honored to be in there.
Every friend I have would be spending every weekend there.
I'd be touring it every day in my off time.
I'd want to soak up every amount of history I could.
You couldn't get me out, maybe to Camp David for the same reason, but you couldn't get me out.
These people can't wait to get out of it, which has always struck.
It's on Jacob Tapper's site on ABC.
Jacob Tapper.
That's what Obama calls him.
Jacob Tapper has got the Carla Brunei story.
Well, let's see how long that lasts.
Now, why?
You know, I mean, Muchell Obama could have said to Carla Brunei, don't ask.
I mean, she could have lied.
Oh, it's such an honor, such a woman.
No, she said, it's hell.
I hate it.
So we did a little research.
The UK Sunday Times, June 5th, 2009, Barack and Michelle Obama decline dinner with the Sarkozy.
The Obamas turned up in Paris this evening, but have declined a dinner invitation from a couple next door, the Sarkozy's.
President Obama's reluctance to spend more than a minimum time with a French leader on his visit for the D-Day anniversary has come as an embarrassment for Elise Palace.
America's First Family will not be dining with President Sarkozy and his wife, even though they are staying at the residence of the U.S. Ambassador, which is right across the street from Elise Apartments where the Sarkozy spend their weekends.
Mr. Sarkozy's staff were trying yesterday to arrange another private moment between the couples.
Mr. Obama due to fly back to Washington tomorrow night or on Sunday.
Mr. Sarkozy's dream date would be dinner somewhere spectacular, such as the Jule Verne, the Alain Dukas restaurant in the Tourifelle.
The Obamas were reported on French celebrity websites to be planning a meal there by themselves.
So anyway, Sarkozy's, the president of France, says to the president of the United States, hey, we'd like to take you to dinner.
And the president of the United States says, stop, sorry, not going to be here long enough.
So maybe Carla Brunei, you're the Sarkozy's, this is how they get even.
Now, Jacob Tapper, White House is denying a story.
Spokesman for First Lady Obama, Catherine McCormick Lelieveld, tells ABC News the first lady never said it.
Well, now we have a dilemma.
Who do we believe?
Do we believe Sarkozy's wife, Carla Brunei, who once dated Mick Jagger And who fell in love with Sarkozy, who's about five feet shorter than she is while on a tour of the pyramids in Egypt.
Or do we believe Muchel Obama via her spokesman, Catherine McCormick-Lelieveld, through Jacob Tapper at ABC News that she never said it?
Who do we believe here?
I mean, I look at Carla Brunei, Demetries says he's got an honest face from all outward appearances.
You are tempted here to go with the French babe.
I mean, you're really tempted here to go with the French babe because we know that the Obamas are liberals and we know that liberals lie.
And see, the problem with this is that it's believable.
This is the problem that Catherine McCormick-Leliveld has as the spokeswoman for Muchel Obama, and that is that what Carla Brunei said is believable.
It's hell.
I hate the job.
Anyway, so that's the fact that only Jacob Tapper at ABC News is covering this tells me how big this is.
Although this is from the, what is this, the Politico, Democrats spend on anti-health reform efforts.
We had this story yesterday.
More Democrats are coming out against Obamacare.
They had the story yesterday that all 34 of House Democrats have voted against it, one in their primaries, where the Democrats were afraid that people who voted against it were lose.
The Democrats that voted against it are winning big.
Democrat candidates are spending three times more advertising against health reform law than they are in support of it.
Democrats don't want Obama anywhere near them on the campaign trail.
They're out spending more money advertising they oppose Obamacare than they are advertising how great it is and how much they support it.
And yet the story, of course, is what?
The internocene warfare inside the Republican Party.
Brief time out.
We've got to come back after this and continue.
Don't go away.
On the cutting edge of societal evolution, Rush Slimbo, a talent on loan from God, get this.
The West Virginia Department of Transportation is floating the idea of charging an additional tax on food purchased at drive-thrus.
The idea was discussed Monday at a meeting of state legislators.
It would be an extra 5% added to the 6% customers already pay.
It could bring in tens of millions of dollars for roads, according to official estimates.
Some restaurant owners fear it would hurt business.
I'm not kidding here, drive-through restaurants, an additional 5% sales tax.
You know what's going to happen.
People are going to go inside.
They're going to stop driving through.
These idiots do not understand the dynamics of their tax law.
And what is this bringing in millions of dollars for roads?
You know, this is the kind of stuff that is driving incumbents into the hitterlands.
Roads, we just were told we spent a trillion dollars in stimulus on infrastructure.
And then we had it here a couple weeks ago that we need 50 billion more for infrastructure for schools and roads and bridges and highways.
Now, we're not idiots.
We're sitting out here and say, okay, a trillion dollars for roads, bridges, and stimulus, and infrastructure.
And we all know it didn't work.
There isn't any infrastructure rebuilding going on, then unemployment rates skyrocket, so they come back another $50 billion for infrastructure, and they pass that.
And now West Virginia wants an additional 5% sales tax on drive-through restaurants to build roads.
Well, how stupid do these people think we are?
We just finished being told that we spent a trillion dollars to revive and save an economy to build roads.
And we're still raising taxes to build roads.
And why are there any problems with the roads anyway, given how much taxes are already being paid and spent on building and maintaining roads?
I'll guarantee you, every road with Robert Byrd's name on it in West Virginia is probably not in state of disrepair.
Who's next on this program?
Madeira, California.
Joe, thank you for waiting, sir.
You are on the EIB network.
Hi.
Hey, Rush, how are you?
Very well, sir.
Thank you.
Thank you on your marriage and on having a relevant show for 22 years.
Thank you, sir.
I'm calling today about the limbo laws.
The limbo laws basically vote the conservatives.
Doesn't matter if they're a Republican or not.
Better to have a liberal that we know than a rhino.
No, no, no.
No, no, no, no, no.
By the way, there is no limbo law.
There's a limbaugh rule.
And that is when faced with a liberal or a conservative on a ballot, always vote the conservative, period.
I'm talking about, say, in the O'Donnell race.
It was Councillor O'Donnell, and everyone was saying that O'Donnell isn't electable.
Only my counselors, because he's a rhino.
And you said, you know, better vote for the conservatives than for the rhino, even though the conservative is there's a good chance that they're unelectable.
Well, no, I don't believe the conservatives are unelectable.
I didn't put that in there.
That's not my rule, it does not stipulate even if somebody loses.
What I said was it does us no good to have a 51-seat majority if eight or four or five of the votes are liberal, Republicans, or rhinos.
Because 51 votes is not enough for a legislative majority.
You need 60 votes in the Senate.
So unless you're talking 60, you're whistling Dixie.
So you have 51, we'll have 51 seats.
My point was to illustrate these people are not really interested in a policy agenda.
They want their chairmanships.
51 seats, give me 51 seats.
This went 51 seats.
Now, of course, they don't want 51 seats if the 51st seat's going to be O'Donnell for some reason.
But it does no good to have rhinos agreeing with liberal Democrat policies and voting for because it waters down conservatism.
It waters down and destroys the brand of Republicanism.
And it gets and we end up being blamed for liberal policies because our guys vote for it.
The limbaugh rule: you got a liberal or a conservative running, you vote the conservative, period.
End of story.
But who knows who's electable?
This was my point.
The Buckley rule that these guys are all quoting.
By the way, half of these people quoting the Buckley rule couldn't carry his typewriter.
A lot of these guys want to assume that they're the new Buckley.
None of them are the new Buckley.
There is no new Buckley.
These guys have not made names for themselves, so they want to associate themselves with Buckley, the Buckley rule here.
Buckley violated his own rule.
Jay Nordlinger, National Review Online, have a great post.
Impromptus.
He said the Buckley rule was really for presidential races in the first place.
It's not meant to be applied in all these hinterland places, midterm elections and all that.
But the bottom line is, you know, William Buckley, as the godfather of conservatism.
Somebody new shows up on the scene.
He welcomed him in.
The movement was the movement.
He was all happy to have them there, promoted them if they were worthwhile.
And by the way, if they weren't, he dissed them.
He got rid of the Birchers.
He wasn't particularly fond of Ayn Rand.
But for the most part, Buckley didn't pretend other conservatives didn't exist.
There is no new Buckley.
These guys invoking the Buckley rule, but Limbaugh rule, you got a liberal or a rhino or a conservative, invoked conservative.
Pure E-Ud.
Excalummation point.
That's the limbaugh rule.
We don't get into electability because we're not clairvoyant.
And we don't tell ourselves we can't.
Just yesterday, Christine O'Donnell had 50 grand on tamp, and she was down 25 points and had no prayer.
Today she's got over a million dollars and she's only down 11 in one day.
Don't tell us we can't win.
That's another thing you people in the establishment have got to stop.
You got to stop telling us who can't win and who can because you don't know.
Nobody knows till the votes are counted.
Tony in College Station, Texas.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hi.
Rush.
Ditto to the highest.
It is great to talk to you.
If living in the White House is hell, I am done with church.
I can tell you right now.
But I can see what her point is, and it's because she's accountable for what she's saying now.
And that really kind of ties into why I called the beginning with.
Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, hold on.
Who are we talking about here?
Michelle Obama.
Okay, Michelle Obama, and you can see her point, but living there is hell.
Yes, yes, because she's finally accountable for the things she's saying.
And that's kind of why I called to begin with.
You said earlier, the thing is, is the media has been able to almost act like a skin or a filter and go, well, no, that's not what they meant.
But they've been so overboard that there's not platitudes to point to anymore.
You can point to the things they're saying.
Nowadays, when you argue with the liberal, you don't have to go through stuff.
You can point.
You can point to a street corner.
You can point to the paper.
You can point to anything and prove them wrong pretty quickly.
It's almost gotten to the point that I think they ought to find people with Obama stickers and revoke their license right there because they're not responsible enough to drive.
I don't know.
It's pretty sad.
You may, in all of that, have a point.
There may be a diamond in all of that.
Because essentially here, what Tony said was one of the reasons Muchel might not like it is she's accountable.
They've never had to be accountable before.
They've had non-show-up jobs, no-show jobs.
You might even say, folks, this guy is lighting bulbs all across my brain.
Not only could it be that they don't like that there's accountability, that people actually listen to what they say and react to it, sometimes criticize it, they also have to work.
It could well be that this is the first time in their lives they've had to work.
A no-show job is a no-show job.
$325,000 for having your name on the masthead at a hospital.
Law professor, University of Chicago teaching Alinsky tactics, work.
Having somebody at Harvard turn your C into an A, put you on a law review at work.
Yeah, accountability and work.
They just didn't think it would be this hard.
Shazam, he may have a point.
I'm sitting here, I'm watching Andrea Mitchell, NBC News in Washington, interview Mahmoud Ahmadine Zad over in Tehran.
She's wearing the headscarf, and I'm just remembering when he came to the United States and the people at Columbia University invited him to speak there.
And he asked, he was asked a question by a student about gay rights in Iran.
He said, oh, we don't have any of those.
The crowds.
I don't know what made me think of this.
But he said, we don't have any homosexuals in Iran.
And students in the hall started laughing and snickering.
And Ahmedine Nizad said, oh, really?
If you know of one, could you tell me where they live?
Remember that?
We don't have any in Iran.
What does it happen in Iran?
Oh, well, you know, Jim, but perhaps you can tell me where they live.
I don't know what made me think of that.
It was just, I guess it's an American newswoman showing profound awe and respect for this little guy.
They don't have homosexuals, so they kill him.
The answer.
Back to the audio soundbites we go.
Rush Limbaugh wants purity in the GOP.
This morning, CNN's American Morning, Jim Acosta, the CNN correspondent, reporting about the Delaware race.
The co-host Kieran Chetri said, Carl Rove had some harsh things to say about Christine O'Donnell.
He said that she serious character problems, went on to say, why did she mislead voters about her college education?
Serious questions about how she makes her living.
He went on to say he doesn't think Republicans can win that seat.
Right, purity.
Mr. Acosta, can you tell me the last time the Democrats actually campaigned for the Reagan Democrats?
You know, back in the 1980s, there was this phenomenon known as the Reagan Democrats.
And, of course, we welcomed them in for the Republican Party.
We welcomed them.
I don't remember the Democrats campaigning for them.
I don't remember the Democrats suggesting we should vote for Reagan Democrats.
So why, Mr. Acosta, should we go out and promote Obama Republicans?
Where is our future?
We're not talking about purity here.
We're talking about loyalty.
We're talking about right versus wrong.
If you're for Obama to become a Democrat, and don't tarnish our brand.
So then the fill-in co-host Drew Griffin said, well, voters didn't vote for Carl Roe.
She got the votes.
So is there a power shift going on in Washington?
Yes, folks, to answer your question, it still is funny to sit here and listen to these people talk about me.
I already said I told you so, but the second book was, see, I told you so.
I've already, anyway, it's just, it is, it's fun to listen to.
Now, last night, Rolf was back on Fox.
He was on Fox this morning.
He's doubled down against Christine O'Donnell.
I got emails last night.
I was not watching Fox last night.
I was sitting there.
Catherine and I were talking about some stuff I got to do in the future.
And all of a sudden, iPhone starts going nuts.
I look at it.
I'm getting emails.
Oh, Greta's talking about you.
Rov's talking about you.
Greta's playing your comments about Rove.
And I said, I'm sorry, I'm missing it.
I'm not watching it.
One email said, Rove's committing political suicide.
We don't understand this.
Can you help us understand what's going on?
I can't explain this.
So on the Greta replay, I stood up or stayed up to watch it.
The Greta replay is one o'clock.
So I watched it, and we got a few soundbites from it.
This is before talking with Rove, she played this soundbite for him to react to.
And this is Karl Rove's reaction.
Greta Van Sustrin said, well, is Rush Limbaugh right?
Big tent.
And then turns his sights on Christine O'Donnell again.
Van Susterin says, well, look, if it's a big party, and I guess I'm not so sure how big I would be in a similar situation, but would you not think Congressman Mike Castle would have called and congratulated her, endorsed her or something?
I think this is being, I think all that's being denied.
Anyway, clearly there's something personal here to explain all of this.
At any rate, we now move on to MSNBC, where, yeah, I'm going to move on.
Snirdly, this kind of stuff was in the campaign throughout the last week of it.
I mean, Castle was saying weird things like, she wants to take your pornography away from you.
It was going back and forth.
It was a traditional.
It's like Castle went out and said that I was accusing him of voting to Peach Bush, and I didn't.
Anyway, so now they're talking about this at MessNBC on Hardball last night.
Chris Matthews was speaking with F. Chuck Todd.
Matthews said, is Rush right?
Karl Rove right.
Bad night, good night.
Let me, okay, let me weigh in on this because I don't, I think people are missing what this is all about.
And I don't know.
This is just a wild guess.
But we had the comments from Mike Murphy earlier today that I shared.
Mike Murphy, Republican consultant, has got his underwear in a wad because people are suggesting that the inside to Beltway Republicans are out of touch, that they're too moderate, that they're ruling class types.
And Mike Murphy is a campaign consultant, worked with McCain a couple times, I believe.
And so Murphy, okay, okay, okay.
You, Palin DeMan, you know how it's done?
You know how to do my job?
Fine.
Then you go to Delaware right now and you camp out.
You live there the next two months and you show us.
You show us Georgetown cocktail party types.
You show us how it's done.
All right.
So obviously some people, these consultants have got their noses out of joint that the unprofessionals, like you and I, claim to know better how to get people elected and how to govern than they do.
Now, what is the difference between us and them?
They are, well, right, it's not a game to us, but B, they are numbers crunchers.
Both these guys, Murphy and Carl, deal with 15% to 20% of the electorate.
The precious undecideds, independents, or whatever you want to call them.
And they live and breathe in figuring out ways to get those people voting for their candidate.
It's not ideological.
It's the furthest thing from ideology.
It is pure numbers politics.
It is pure.
If you have to have a candidate say he's pro-life when he's not, you do it if that's what it's going to take to get.
If you have a candidate who doesn't believe in immigration and amnesty, but you need that vote, you have to be, okay, he's going to allow that he might vote.
You do that.
At 15 to 20%, that's where they live.
Their selling point, the reason they get hired in their minds is to deliver a majority of that 15 to 20 percent.
They're numbers crunchers.
They live and breathe in the belief that the rock-ribbed on the left and the rock-ribbed on the right are immovable, and they're a given percentage in every election, and that the only thing that changes their numbers is turnout.
But they live, and I, you know, at this dinner party that I keep quoting on Saturday, I launched into all kinds of people Saturday.
I was the only guy saying what I was saying.
I felt like I was the circus act at this dinner.
I was talking about how I resent this attention being focused on independence and moderate.
I can't stand so much money and attention being spent on people who won't have the guts to tell us what they think, who sell their votes for slick campaign tactics or what have you.
Who are these people?
I'd rather go out and try to persuade these people to join us on the basis of principle and ideology rather than play a numbers game and get these people voting every election however we want them to vote based on something that has no staying power.
I said, give me the committed, principled liberal or conservative every day.
I'd rather talk to them.
Because I think we've elevated this great unwashed independent group, the moderates, the independent, whatever, the undecided.
We have elevated them to superhumans that they think they're smarter than everybody else.
They think they're more mature than everybody else.
They think they're more important than everybody else because consultants of campaigns have told them they are.
Every damn one of them.
I don't care.
You pick a campaign consultant on any television cable network at any campaign time.
And what do they focus on?
The independence.
They don't focus on ideology.
If a campaign consultant thinks that he has to be a conservative to get your voter support, he'll do that.
He has to call himself a conservative.
But now, now all of a sudden, the dynamic is different.
Nobody in this cycle is at all conservatively independent.
We're concerned with saving the country.
There is an ideological principle at stake here, a fact-of-life, serious matter at stake here.
And I don't think these guys know how to deal with that in their world of numbers crunching.
So maybe they're just trying to hang on.
Maybe this cycle is sort of passing them by.
I'd look at guessing here, but I know where they live.
And Murphy, okay, you show us how it's done.
Us Georgetown cocktail types.
Obviously, he seethes with resentment at being called ruling class cocktail party Washington, D.C. insider.
Okay, Palin.
Okay, Dement.
You go to Delaware.
You show us how it's done.
So there's a, this is the professionals versus the amateurs.
This is not moderates versus conservatives or the liberals versus conservatives.
This is the professionals versus what they think are a bunch of rubes.
Back after this.
Don't go away.
Yeah, you can just put it there on the chair.
That is a great dress.
That is a fabulous.
That's a classy dress in shoes.
It really is.
Welcome back, folks.
El Rushbo on the EIB network, the Limbo Institute, for it was Catherine bringing me some cold medicine in.
She just dropped in the door here.
Ladies and gentlemen, in any economy, especially in this one, we speak with our wallets.
And that's why I'm so proud to let you know that Inc. Magazine has heard you.
Inc. Magazine has just named Carbonite the ninth fastest-growing private company in America, number one fastest-growing company in the IT services category.
Carbonite.
An advertiser here on the EIB network, the Inc. 500 list, represents the most important segment of our economy, America's independent-minded entrepreneurs.
Carbonite is growing so quickly because more and more of you trust me.
Trust Carbonite to protect your computer files.
I screwed that up on purpose.
Had to put myself in the commercial.
Carbonite automatically backs up your files to a safe off-site location whenever you're connected to the internet.
In my case, that's all the time.
I have a constant 24-7 connection.
So the backup is happening all the time.
After the original is done, just incremental backups take place.
You never see it.
You forget it's happening until your hard drive blows up.
Then you have to restore and voila, no panic.
You can even access your backed up files from another computer or your iPad or iPhone or BlackBerry with a special app.
Carbonite, for your Mac or PC, $55 a year, 15 cents a day.
And if you use offer code Rush, you'll get a genuine two-week free trial, two free months if you decide to buy.
Carbonite, back it up, get it back at carbonite.com with the offer code Rush.
Mark Wilmington, Delaware.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hi.
Rush Mega Dittos.
Thank you.
And I just wanted to say I think you're a little bit wrong on the race in Delaware.
It's considered from the Democrats as Joe Bitene's seat.
And I believe that they wanted Castle to win because in the next cycle, they can have Joe Biden's son, Bo, who is the attorney general, run for that seat and win.
Now, wait, wait, wait, wait.
Well, I'm going to follow you on this because they think Bo Biden could beat Castle in two years?
Yes.
Okay.
And now they have their, they don't know what to do because if Christine O'Donnell does not beat Coons, then you have two Democratic senators and there's no room for Joe Bitene's son, Bo Biden.
But I thought Bo Bitene said he didn't want the seat anyway.
Well, he didn't because he's new on the political scene.
He's the new Attorney General.
He hasn't really proved himself yet.
He's had a couple setbacks.
That's not been a setback for his dad.
That has not been a setback for half the Democrats in the Senate.
What do you prove themselves?
I know what you're trying to say.
So you're saying that because the Democrats say there's no way they're going to elect Christine O'Donnell now?
Now, secretly, they want to elect her because they want him to run against her.
He has no room to run in the night.
Okay.
Well, okay, then if that's, if the Democrats were told the Democrats are on the show, if the Democrats wanted to win, she'll win.
Case closed, it's over.
And just yesterday they told us she couldn't.
See how easy this is?
I mean, that's really laughable.
Bo Biden hadn't yet proved himself like Obama has.
Obama proved himself.
If that last caller from Wilmington was right, and I don't doubt it for a minute, if the game was Castle wins for two years with Bo Biden, I'll guarantee Mike Castle would have probably gladly stepped aside for Bo Biden.
And so now we find out that the whole game is in an upset there.
The Democrats don't know what to do now.
▲
Export Selection