All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 15, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:47
September 15, 2010, Wednesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Well, looks like a lot of um voters in Delaware employed a limbaugh rule.
You got a conservative on a ballot, you vote yes.
Period.
Anyway, great to have you here, Rush Limbaugh, the EIB Network, and the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Full three hours of broadcast excellence straight away, and it's a fun day.
It's an interesting day.
It is a great day.
It is shaping up here as uh what we've always known is going on.
It's Washington versus the country.
It really is Washington versus the country.
I can't tell you.
My email started going nuts last night with Carl Rove appearing on Sean Hannity.
If you didn't hear it, and by the way, what there's a lot to say here, and I'm going to try to keep it somewhat organized, but the brain neurons are firing all over the place here.
Remember the argument was no, we gotta support Castle.
We gotta support Castle because we need 51 seats in the Senate.
That's all that matters.
We got to get 51 seats.
We got to get the majority.
We gotta get 51 seats.
Okay, now we have a Republican Senate candidate in New Hampshire, and the 51 seat argument's gone.
The same people.
Last night, word got out the National Republican senatorial campaign wasn't going to fund her.
That uh the Tea Party, they don't like a Tea Party, they don't like Christine O'Donnell.
She's on her own now.
I mean, you gave her to us, you uh you take care of her.
She wants to she wants to get elected, she handled it herself.
That was what was coming out last night.
Cornyn has put out a statement saying, no, no, no, no, no, that's not true.
Uh we we uh congratulate um uh Christine O'Donnell.
I uh I personally, as the committee's chairman, strongly stand by all of our Republican nominees, including Christine O'Donnell in Delaware.
I reached out to her this morning, and as I have conveyed to all of our nominees, I offered her my personal congratulations and let her know that she has our support.
Uh and the support includes a check for 42,000, the maximum allowable donation we have provided to all of our nominees, which the National Republican Senatorial Committee will send to her campaign today.
Now last night they weren't gonna do this.
Now, it's not that they slept on it and they got over their mad.
They know they're facing an uprising.
They know that if they don't fund Christine O'Donnell, they're not gonna get any money from anybody.
But it doesn't matter.
As uh my friends, if each of you just sent Christine O'Donnell a dollar.
If each of you just sent every Tea Party candidate a dollar, we wouldn't need the NRSC.
We wouldn't need the RNC.
We wouldn't need the Congressional Campaign Committee in the House for the Republicans if you set her a dollar.
I'm not, it's up to you.
I mean, I'm not a fundraiser here.
But I just it is it is interesting to watch all this play out because the sides are they're they're definitely showing themselves now.
Washington versus the rest of the country.
But this argument going into the election, we got 51 votes, we gotta get 51 seats.
Castle's the only way we gotta get 51 seat.
Now they don't care about having 51 seats.
Now that what what difference does it make?
Who's in the 51st seat?
Getting the majority is important.
Who's who what does it matter?
I mean, they didn't care that it was Castle in the seat.
Now all of a sudden they care that it's O'Donnell and let's see why.
Because it's Washington versus the rest of the country.
Let's uh here's the audio sound bites of Rove last night.
I I I I watched, I was saying to myself, if he had just gotten this mad at Democrats during the Bush administration, why who knows how things would be different today.
And Carl has admitted that one of his mistakes was not defending Bush against all these insane stupid slanderous, libelous attacks against Bush for eight years.
But I've never heard I've never heard Carl so animated against a Democrat as he was against Christine O'Donnell last night.
He appeared with Hannity, who said, I think there's a battle going on, what we define as the establishment talking about Dana and Stuart, Dana Perino, and uh Stuart Varney that were on earlier in the show.
And those that are taking strong conservative views, I mean, Mike Castle's one of the seven or eight Republicans in the House that voted for Cap and Trade.
He's not pro-life.
You have the establishment over the years.
Look what they've backed.
Darling Specter, Charlie Chris Murkowski.
They didn't support Rand Paul, Sharon Angle.
There seems to be a schism here.
Seems to be a divide.
One thing that Christine O'Donnell is now going to have to answer in the general election that she didn't in the primary is her own checkered background.
I've met her.
I wasn't frankly impressed as her abilities as a candidate.
And again, these serious questions about how does she make her living?
Why did she mislead voters about her college education?
How come it took her nearly two decades to pay her college bills so she could get her college degree?
How does she make a living?
He never asked these questions about Democrats.
And people were, I I everybody I know were just that saw this, was just they were perplexed that couldn't figure what's going on.
Why is he so mad at a Republican?
Where was this anger directed at a Democrat ever?
And then get it continued.
You know, Hannity was, well, I I uh I very uh just disagree, Carl.
I don't see it this way.
This was about Mike Castle's bad votes.
It does conservatives little good to support candidates who, at the end of the day, while they may be conservative in their public statements, do not evince the characteristics of rectitude and truthfulness and and sincerity and character that the voters are looking for.
And we'll see how she can answer these questions.
I'm for the Republican, but we were looking at eight to nine seats in the Senate.
We're now looking at seven to eight.
This is not a race we're gonna be able to win.
We're gonna throw in the towel here.
By the way, yesterday she was down 25, today she's down 16.
In some polls, she's only down 11.
She doesn't have to make just gets needs to make up half of that.
But why not fight for it?
No, why not fight for it?
You know, Castle's okay as the 51st vote, but this woman isn't with her character problems and her rectitude problem as to the Democrats for crying out.
What do we ever hear about the character of Ted Kennedy?
What do we ever hear about the character?
For God's sakes, the character of Barack Obama, does anybody not give a?
He is destroying our country.
Single-handedly and with the help of his party is destroying the very job creation that leads to prosperity in this country.
Joe Biden, our current vice president, is a known plagiarist.
What we were talking about Christine O'Donnell's baggage?
Where is this criticism of Democrats?
Where has it been?
Why is he so sacrosanct about showing respect to them?
And eating our own.
And who's to say that she can't be the 51st seat?
If 51 seats was really the objective, if getting that majority is really that important, then let's go balls to the wall for Christine O'Donnell.
But no, no, no, we're not going to do that because for some reason we don't want Christine O'Donnell to be the first 51st vote.
Some Republicans do not want her to be the 51st vote.
So it's Washington versus the country.
Carl's talking about the rectitude of character when talking about the Biden seat.
Can we talk about the character of Harry Reid in some land deals over the course of his time?
For crying out loud, the rectitude of character, John Carey.
We're going to sit here, and yesterday we had Castle be the audio sniper Castle saying he talked to Lisa Murkowski in Alaska, and she said, Beware of these people, meaning a Tea Party.
And it was really a shame.
It was really, really a big shame out there because so many Democrat senators respected Lisa Murkowski.
Was that our objective here?
Charlie Wrangle.
Charlie Wrangle just won.
He got the expected.
He wins the nomination and the all-but guaranteed seat, which means that he, Charlie Wrangle, and his scandals will not go away.
Pelosi will have either to drain the swamp or swamp the drain, one of the two of the things he's going to have to do.
Can we talk about rectitude of character for Charlie Wrangell?
Training both barrels, Republicans training both barrels on Christine O'Donnell.
You know, a lot of people over the years have uh have been suspicious of the motivations of establishment Republicans.
And it is becoming clear that those suspicions were valid.
Here's what Christine O'Donnell, by the way, uh, last night.
Uh sorry, this is uh today in Good Morning America, and uh George Stephanopoulos said to her, Carl Rove was on Fox News very tough talking about your checkered background, saying some nutty things.
Can you answer those questions?
Everything that he's saying is unfactual.
He's the same so-called political guru that predicted I wasn't gonna win.
And we won and we won big.
He's eating some humble pie.
My Republican opponent did not have a record to stand on.
He supported the Democrats more than he supported the Republicans, and when we started gaining momentum and we started gaining credibility in this race, it made the Republican establishment look like lazy people who did not care about their principles.
But I hope that we can put that behind this because if they're really serious about winning, I was ahead in the general election, according to Rasmussen, before this Republican cannibalism started.
So if they were serious about winning, we could repair the damage done and move forward.
And that's the challenge that I put out to that.
That's a legitimate question that she's got if they're serious about winning.
I mean, they couldn't wait to win with Castle.
Um Carl said last night on Hannity Show, he said, Sean, you keep making my point.
This is uh this election is all about castle.
Well, so is unqualified.
He's a fraud, he's not a conservative.
Mike Castle's not gonna lift one finger to reverse the direction this country's headed.
A vast majority of the American people want it reversed and yesterday.
And they are going to support people who say they're gonna do this.
They've been around long enough to learn that conservative rhetoric in a campaign isn't enough anymore.
You know, look at voting records.
I mean, the same people who told us we had to support Chris, so we had to go with Kess.
Same people say we had to support um McCain, we have to we have to support Castle.
Same people.
I mean, it it every person they tell us we have to support is dud.
He's a loser.
They said, Scott Brown didn't have a chance.
No, don't waste any money on Scott Brown.
The same people told us we had to go with Charlie Chris, told us we had to go with Mike Castle.
Same people told us we had to go with Arlen Spector, told us we had to go with Mike Castle.
Same people we had to go at McCain told us we had to go with Mike Castle.
Same people who told us we had to support Didi Skazafava, told us we had to support Mike Castle.
Same people who told us that we have to love the two female rhinos in Maine, told us we have to go with Mike Castle.
Same people who told us, oh, it's a shame that Chris Shays is out of there.
We have to have Republicans in the Northeast told us we had to go with Mike Castle.
As I said all along, what this is about is the Republican, the conservatives taking back the Republican Party.
And that's um the process.
And here's the bottom line, folks.
When they told us we had to support all these people, if they won, we did.
When Spectre won, we got in line.
We were loyal, okay.
The party, the party.
We supported somebody who opposed Spectre, but Spectre wins, we got in line.
Now look at the petulant attitude.
These people, well, you Christine O'Donnell wins, she's not around.
You're on around.
No, no.
So it's always a one-way street.
Anyway, um, where's the importance of party unity now?
They keep talking about party unity up till this election.
Now they don't care about party unity.
51st vote.
That's all this election's about, Limboa.
We gotta get the 51st vote, we gotta get control of the Senate.
We know we're gonna get troll House, we've got to get control of the Senate.
And all of a sudden they don't care about it.
The 51st vote might be Christine O'Donnell, and so they don't want to control the Senate.
Where's the big tent?
Keep telling us we have to have a big tent.
The Republican Party's gonna be the big tent.
Well, where is the tent?
The tent has collapsed.
The truth is there never was a tent.
The media ruling class always say Republicans can't win.
The only one they said that could win was McCain.
Why listen to Democrats who say, hey, there's something amiss here.
Whenever one of their candidates loses.
And they said Reagan couldn't win.
They said Reagan would be bad for the country.
I'm talking about Republicans.
Reagan would be bad for the party.
The GOP establishment was never comfortable with Reagan.
And even today, when they praise Reagan, you can sense its lip service.
They think they have to, but Reagan was as big a dunce as they think I am.
So Castle, whose whole career was based on conservatives holding their nose and voting for the guy.
We had to.
Well, he's a Northeast.
That's the best we can do.
Rush, I might Castle's it.
Now Castle says he won't support O'Donnell.
He won't support big tent party unity.
Establishment guys training their guns on Christine O'Donnell.
Interesting to see.
But they know they face a revolt now.
Corning, the Republican Senate campaign.
I imagine when the word went out last night.
I mean, I corners from Texas.
I imagine what happened when the word went out last night, whether it was accurate or not, the word was out that the Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee was not going to fund her.
In Texas.
I'll bet you the people work for Corn and heard about that.
I'll bet Corny got some emails.
McConnell's getting some emails.
Anyway, brief time out here, folks.
We'll get to your comments on all this as well as we dig deeper.
Uncover what this is really all about, which we all know.
Back after this.
You know, it's such a shame today.
Such a shame that Harry Reid can't call Mike Castle and start asking him to switch parties.
Like you did with Jumpin' Jim Jeffords and Arlen Specter.
Christine O'Donnell.
I like what I hear of this woman.
She said, Good morning, America today.
She or Fox with Friends.
Oh, she was everywhere.
She referred to Castle as an Obama Republican.
It's exactly what he is, exactly what he was.
He's an Obama Republican.
Christine O'Donnell came up with that.
And according to all the wizards as smart on our side, it was Mike Castle.
Only Mike Castle could beat the Democrat in November.
And Mike, by the way, this Democrat is a Marxist.
I mean, there's a joke going around.
He's a bearded Marxist or Marxist with a beard.
He describes himself that way.
This guy is a sitting duck.
He's only Mike Castle can beat this guy.
Mike Castle couldn't even beat a woman with uh character rectitude, all this baggage has been labeled on her and dumped on her.
Castle couldn't even beat her, and Castle's the guy that ran a negative campaign.
Delaware's not used to negative campaigns.
You know what people think?
You know, when they when they hear Carl and others talk about whatever baggage Christine O'Donnell has, let me tell you, people in Washington something.
Everybody in the country thinks all of you are corrupt.
So Mike Castle is not innocent.
He's not clean and pure as a wind driven snow.
So when you Republicans start talking about all the baggage Christine O'Donnell has, you're gonna have to understand that voters around the country think all of you have baggage.
And voters around the country understand what it is to run up against a bureaucracy, a federal bureaucracy.
All these problems that she has paying off loans and so forth.
Who the hell doesn't?
Who the hell hasn't had a run-in with the IRS?
So she's had a run over the IRS.
That's a resume enhancement to a lot of people.
The government is the enemy here to a lot of people.
The government needs to be downsized.
The government's too intrusive.
The government is chipping away at personal liberty, private property rights, and so forth.
The people of this country do not view Washington as a way to promote politicians.
It's not a place where chairmanships are the reward.
So Castle's going to run around and talk about, and all these other Republicans want to cite the baggage that Christine O'Donnell has.
Fine and dandy.
Let's hear you talk about the baggage that Charlie Wrangle has.
Let's see you talk about the baggage that carry that Harry Reed has, or that any of these Democrats have.
The baggage that Clinton had and has.
Somehow it only disqualifies Christine O'Donnell.
This is reminiscent of 1994, but in one distinct way.
Voters are not going to react to all these charges of uh character rectitude because in their minds every politician's got a character problem.
It's a part and parcel of being one.
Mitt Romney has endorsed Christine O'Donnell.
The day after the election, Mitt Romney has endorsed Christine O'Donnell.
Now, we should point out uh Carl Rove, who you all loved.
I mean we guest hosted this program.
You love Carl Rove.
He is supporting Sharon Angle.
There's something in this O'Donnell business that we don't know.
There's something there.
I mean, maybe maybe her cam, and maybe Castle's campaign manager is one of Rove's best friends.
Hell, I don't know.
I'm just throwing it up against a wall here, but I mean, you know, campaign managers and consultants, these people are thickest thieves like anybody in the same business, and who knows.
There's something about this race.
I mean, Carl turned personal in ways he's never gotten before with anybody.
At the end of the day, though, we're gonna have one less rhino in Washington.
It's a great night.
There's one less rhino, and before we're through in November, there's gonna be a lot fewer rhinos there.
Feel like George Patton today, folks.
It's exactly love the smell of battle out there.
Like the see the Carthaginians out there.
The limbaugh rule.
By the way, Arlen Spector has weighed in on the limbaugh rule.
Arlen Spector on the limbaugh rule.
This uh this campaign is not about creating and saving Republican jobs.
The Limbaugh rule, conservatives on the ballot, you vote for them, period.
The limbaugh rules, it's very simple.
We are at a crossroads.
You know, there's a fork in the road up there, and you take the wrong direction, the country's finished.
I that I'm not stating this idly.
Um I'm not being gratuitous anyway, I'm not exaggerating.
And the American people know it.
The American people fear for this country's future.
And if elected officials in the Capitol don't see it, if they don't see it that way, if they don't understand the gravity of the people's lives are at stake here, people's ability to earn a living is at stake here.
The very essence of being an American, liberty and freedom is at stake here.
We already are living a soft tyranny.
And if anybody in Washington, ostensibly on the Republican side does not understand this, they are gonna go.
It's not politics as usual.
There is no, you know, party loyalty is not on the ballot here.
America is on the ballot.
People who are for it, people who are against it.
People who are against it or who don't realize the gravity of the future are gonna be are gonna be dispatched.
It's it's really not complicated.
It's I guess it is complicated if you live in Washington and that's your world, and you don't you don't have interaction with anybody outside Washington except pollsters and other campaign consultants and news media types.
But uh I I don't say this lightly.
I mean, this is this is not talk.
And I don't, by the way, you know, I don't say things I don't believe or even exaggerate for the sake of being noticed or getting ratings or shocking people has been something I've formatically uh philosophically opposed ever since I started this kind of show.
If I can't back up what I actually believe, if it's all phony and make believe, I'm not gonna go anywhere.
Am I gonna have any credibility or loyalty with an audience?
If I say it just to get noticed, say it just to shock people.
When I say the American people fear for the future of their lives and the wives of their children and grandchildren, I am dead serious.
I there's I'm not exaggerating.
And if my castle doesn't get that, he's gone.
It's this is where we are.
And by the way, you know, I'm a I got a stack of stuff here with all Ruth Marcus in the Washington Post.
Oh, this is so bad.
This is so she claims she doesn't care about whether the Democrats have a majority or hold on to them.
It's not that, but boy, we just we need more moderate Republicans in the Senate and in the House if we're gonna have any hope of everybody getting along, and this is just so bad to get rid of somebody like Mike Castle, everybody can get along with.
I'm listening to all these people on the cable channels of the left, and they're talking about, oh, man, this is exactly...
Exactly what we want a Republican Party with an internecine war.
Republican Party splitting up the Republican Party at war with its.
I am not seeing a party atmosphere among Democrats.
I'm not seeing all this celebration that we're being told that's taking place.
I'm I don't see all this ebulliance.
I don't see all this happiness that we're told exists within Democrat circles because of what's happening with the Tea Party.
All these Tea Party candidates are waiting.
This guy that beat Lazio in New York, I can't wait to see this guy debate Cuomo.
You know, Andrew Kumo's gonna have to debate this guy.
I can't wait to see that.
That's gonna be national television.
That I can't wait to see.
And I don't I don't see all these parties, I don't see the party atmosphere among Democrats today, last night, after all these Tea Party candidate victories.
You know, the Tea Party is ascension supposed to save a Democrats.
I mean, that's a template.
That's the word we're being told by the partisan political operative media.
That's a strategy that's being advanced out there.
So how come you don't see a lot of smiles on faces of people on the left?
How come you don't see a lot of honest gloating of fact a political story today says it's over for the Democrats 2010.
They're on their own.
It's it's over, it's uh it's history.
And try this.
The politico is just so disappointed they are saddened to have to write this story by Alex Eisenstedt.
Democrat health bill foes escape payback.
Every anti-Obamacare Democrat is winning.
After 34 House Democrats voted against the health care bill in March, liberal groups and their allies in a labor movement vowed to exact revenge.
The threats ranged from crippling primary election challenges to a withdrawal of support for some of the offending lawmakers.
In a few cases, activists even went so far as to say they would run third-party candidates against the Democrats in November.
But five months later, five months since Obamacare was signed, the group of 34 has emerged from primary season, not much worse for the where.
Every one of the 30 lawmakers on the Democrat side who voted against the health care bill and is seeking another term, one renomination.
So where is Bill Clinton?
If you want to hold on to your seat, you gotta vote for this health care bill.
That's why we lost the House back in 1994, because uh people, people, we didn't we didn't pass health care.
You gotta pass health care.
If you don't pass health care, you have no prayer coming back here.
So they you know marched off the cliff like a bunch of limbings following Clinton, except Clinton's got angel wings, he keeps flying, they hit the beach.
Meanwhile, these 34 who were told you're a history.
You may as well get ready.
Al Capone's coming for you.
They're winning.
Democrats opposing their own president are winning.
And we're told that the Tea Party ascension is causing glee on the Democrat side.
This is the real reason we keep getting stories from the Democrat media complex decrying the failure of the Obama army.
And we're getting these stories.
Where is the Obama army?
Remember, we're gonna have all these people in the internet and uh in the streets are gonna be flooding uh the country, uh, whatever Obama wants is gonna get passed.
But these people can't even punish wavered Democrats.
What kind of revolutionary discipline is this?
Castro at least is able to put his political prisoners in jail.
But the dissidents, the Democrat dissidents going up against the regime, are winning.
They're winning.
And meanwhile, we're being told that Christine O'Donnell's got a lot of baggage and we should look the other way and let a mosque be built at ground zero.
We're told Christine O'Donnell's got baggage character rectitude.
What about Obama?
Character rectitude, confiscating one-sixth of the U.S. economy with the healthcare business, destroying the U.S. economy.
Can we talk character?
If you don't want to talk character rectitude, can we talk policy?
I'm gonna tell you something.
There are a bunch of Democrats in this country who are willing to join the Tea Party in stopping the direction the Democrats are taking this country.
Slowly but surely, Washington Republicans are starting to see it.
They're still rebelling against it.
They're still fighting it.
But it's clear what's going on.
It's Washington versus the country.
Obama, the Democrats governing against the will of the people.
Professional politicians and pollsters see them getting away with it.
Obama's not being punished by it.
He doesn't care.
He's out there playing golf.
He's out there smoking.
He got a good tan.
I thought these stories on Boehner were actually stories on Obama till I read further.
We all know what's wrong with Rhinos.
We all know the uh essentials, the basics, but there's something else.
When these rhinos get in, the Senate or the House focused on the Senate.
And when they vote with the Democrats, they tarnish the whole brand of Republicanism.
And they make it much more difficult for conservatives to exact lines of demarcation.
It's uh it's almost you know, if if if we're gonna have a liberal in the Senate, let's have a genuine liberal who's gonna call himself one rather than a Republican who's gonna pretend to be a conservative and then votes liberal and confuses everybody else.
Fred Barnes has a piece out there today listing Castle's problems, why he lost.
One of the problems was he wouldn't even he wouldn't in a primary, wouldn't even gain to call himself a conservative.
It's okay for once he got honest.
What's he supposed to do?
Lie about it?
Act like a conservative just to win?
At least he was honest and didn't try to tell people he's something that he's not.
Fred Barnes, I don't know where it came to his magazine was all for all against O'Donnell.
The weekly standard was, I mean, they were all over the place anti-O'Donnell, building up Castle.
So Fred's got this piece out how you know White Castle blew it.
I don't know where Fred's one of the two editors there, Bill Crystal's the other.
And I I don't I don't know what Fred personally, I don't personally know what Fred wrote about this, byline or not, but I'm just quoting his piece today, why castle lost.
He's got some good points in it.
To the funds.
We're gonna start in Redondo Beach, California.
This is Joe.
Thank you for waiting.
You're up first on the EIB network today.
Hi, Rush.
Love you, man.
Thank you very much, man.
How are you doing?
Very well.
Well, I tried to go on Christina O'Donnell's website today to donate some money, and somehow I think you've crashed her website.
Well, that always happens.
Uh We do that.
It's only temporary.
If you if you're be patient there, her website will come back.
Yeah, I've gone back a couple of times.
I'll just sit here and uh keep hitting donate now until it comes back up.
Well, you know, this is um I started pondering this last night.
You know, when when the when the first words started leaking out there that the Republican Senate campaign committee was in such a snit over this that they weren't going to fund her.
I mean, that was actually a news story.
That was um actually reporting it was political or somebody.
So because it came from the uh the uh liberal media complex, people bought it, but there was something to it.
And I said, well, okay, fine.
If that if that's the way they want to play it, if they want to go on a snit here and say, okay, Christine, you're on your own.
Uh uh, Tea Party, you know, you're you're on your own.
Uh, you got yourself there.
People believed that that was that it was on Fox too.
Uh when that when that story hit, people believed it.
I think Republicans need to ask themselves why did people believe that story?
It turns out Cornan's out today.
So, no, no, no, no.
We're of course we're gonna f we're funding O'Donnell, we fund all Republican nominees.
Last night, when the news was that Republicans to O'Donnell, you're on your own, people believed it.
So I said, hmm.
May not matter.
I wonder if I just haphazardly suggest everybody in this audience send her a buck.
How much money could she raise?
And apparently now you can't get into her website to donate.
Um, Eric in Bloomington, Delaware.
Uh, welcome to the EIB network, sir.
Great to have you with us.
Thank you, Rush.
Um, like I tell my sons, you're one of the best people on the radio.
So I should get me everywhere.
Thank you very much, sir.
I appreciate that.
Okay.
Um, I'm calling because um I I live in Delaware, and um I voted for Castle every election, you know, to keep the Republican in, because you know, we want to get a Republican in there, so but um after he voted for Camp and Trade and I wrote him a letter, emailed him, and he sent me a form letter saying why we you know why he was for it.
It's like he didn't really even care.
So and he's voted for um stem cell.
That's why I supported Christine O'Donnell.
Um I think uh at least I know what I'm getting.
And I'm not gonna get stabbed in the back by votes.
Uh I'm I'm glad, I'm glad you mentioned, you know, cap and trade.
That's not just a piece of legislation.
That is a sledgehammer to freedom.
It is going to boost the cost of the fuel of freedom beyond people's ability to afford it, and therefore their freedom is going to be lost.
Energy prices via taxes would skyrocket.
Which means much less freedom.
You know, oil is the fuel of the engine of freedom.
The more expensive you make every carbon transaction, the less free on purpose, for a bogus reason that we are destroying the planet, that there is global warming.
People know it's all bogus.
So when you have lame brain mind-numbed Republicans supporting this, for whatever insane reason.
I'm sorry, the electorate is sophisticated enough today, they are not going to support it just because there's some R behind it.
The name of somebody who happens to live in Delaware in the Northeast.
It's not an excuse anymore.
How'd it Tea Party this election cycle has been amazing?
It has transformed a lot of boring, hard working American men and women, moms and dads, grandfathers, grandmothers, into a bunch of racist homophobic, Islamophobic, hate mongering insurgents who want their country back.
It's a great thing.
Media tweak of the day.
▲
Export Selection