All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 13, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:44
September 13, 2010, Monday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And greetings to you.
Music lovers, thrill seekers all across the fruited plains, the award-winning thrill packed, ever exciting, increasingly popular, uh growing by leaps and bounds, rush limbaugh program.
Oh, darn it, where is the zoomer?
Oh, here it is.
All right, we got a picture of the way.
What's her name?
Her name is Inez or Inez Sainz.
Now, it's I I'm not sure the Spanish pronunciation.
It's Inez Inez Sainz, S-I-S-A-I-N-Z.
This is a woman's cause all the problems at Jets practice on Saturday.
This is I'm a zoom in here.
For those of you watching on the ditto cam, you'll see her.
This is how she was attired.
There we go.
Now thanks.
It's a good thing we got a high definition camera here.
So there she is.
There's Inez.
Uh, and and she claims that she was uh she's uh uh uh appropriately attired.
Now I'd leave it up to you to decide.
I mean, I'm I'm just there it is.
Uh as you this is from a Chicago newspaper blog.
And this blog is reporting uh, ladies and gentlemen, that it was not just Dennis Thurman that was overthrowing passes to the defensive backs, but it's also the head coach Rex Ryan.
Watching the first episode of Hard Knox training camp of the New York Jets on HBO, and one of the first things that happened in the summertime, the Jets signed uh Rex Ryan, a head coach to a contract extension with a raise, so he gets on the phone, he calls his wife.
Hey, honey, hey honey, I just signed a new deal, you can go shopping now.
I'm thinking, is that a little sexist?
I mean, is that his wife's sitting at home doing nothing and waits for the signal to go shopping?
But then I said, No, no, no, no.
You want the uh lead item here at the uh at the Nag's website is it doesn't get it doesn't get any better than this.
I wanted to see what was on the minds of the Nags.
The National Association of Gals.
That's my pet name for the National Organization for Women.
I kid you not.
The top story on their website.
Get ready to celebrate Love Your Body Day.
I kid you not, folks.
Are you tired of advertisers telling you what's wrong with your body, your skin, your hair, your face?
Are you fed up with the media's narrow portrayal of women?
Help the Nags Foundation promote positive, inclusive images of women and girls.
Start planning events now for Love Your Body Day on October 20th.
There's the Nags website of all days.
What did I tell you?
Feminism was established so as to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream of society.
Who can't get in a locker room?
Oh, the nags can't get in the locker role.
That's what you're still in this locker room business.
No, don't say the nags can't get in the locker room.
I happen to know that's not never.
Um let's let's uh let's move on here, uh uh, ladies and gentlemen.
Uh the interview that Castro gave of this guy from the Atlantic, uh, whatever it is.
He said that the reporter purposely misunderstood him.
When Castro said it a Cuban model doesn't even work for us.
What Castro was saying was that capitalism doesn't work.
Castro speaking at the University of Havana said that his words had been misinterpreted by his U.S. interviewer, the generalist Jeffrey Goldberg of Atlantic Monthly, who quoted a U.S. analyst saying they indicated Castro now supports a smaller state role in the island's Soviet-style economy.
And is the Castro was the correct no, no, no, no.
What I really meant was um uh that uh that uh uh uh capitalism disordered.
Don't forget Castro had an expert from the Council on Foreign Relations.
Because this reporter took an expert from the C A CFR to translate this.
So not only did the journalists get it wrong, but somebody from the uh CFR conspirate conspirator got it wrong.
the CFR experts seemed to be translating as this was going on.
President Barack Obama appealed to an unsettled nation Saturday to honor the memory of the 9-11 attacks by hewing to the values of diversity and tolerance.
We will not sacrifice the liberties we cherish or hunker down behind the walls of suspicion and mistrust, he said.
Oh, that's right.
We are going to save our suspicion and mistrust for the Tea Party.
For Christine O'Donnell, for Sarah Palin, for Sharon Engel, for other bitter clingers.
We're going to go ahead and suspect and mistrust them.
But we're not going to be suspicious and mistrustful of those who wish America harm.
As Americans, we are not and never will be at war with Islam, the president said.
It was not a religion that attacked us that September day.
It was Al Qaeda, a sorry band of men which perverts religion.
Now this is becoming, I think, a uh an increasingly subtle distinction.
Exactly how do those who want the world to be under the rule of Islam, Sharia law, differ in any significant way from the Taliban or from Al Qaeda, except maybe in methodology.
But how do they differ?
I mean, there really isn't any, it's a subtle difference if there is one, but one of tactics, not objective.
Why, why is it so important for us to forget that 9-11 and so many other terrorist attacks have been perpetuated in the name of Islam?
Why do we have to why they have to forget this?
Why are why do we have to forget all of the crimes that have happened against Americans perpetrated by these kinds of people?
Why do you have to forget that?
Why where did the notion that the United States has to be tolerant?
Where did that get started?
Are we the ones who are intolerant?
Or is it those who wish us dead or ill?
Is it they who are intolerant?
Obama, it says here, this is the AP, spoke forcefully.
The highest honor we can pay those we lost, indeed our greatest weapon in this ongoing war, is to do what our adversaries fear the most.
To stay true to who we are as Americans, to renew our sense of common purpose, to say that we define the character of our country, and that we will not let the acts of some small band of murderers who slaughter the innocent and cower in caves distort who we are.
Um, our enemies don't fear that we'll fight back.
Yeah, they most fear that we'll tolerate them.
Uh this doesn't make any sense.
We must not fight back.
That's what they fear most.
They wait fear us, we won't be tolerant, that's what they're afraid of.
I don't know.
This is um they turned the whole thing into a day of service.
Uh is I think it's to hijack the day.
Those people were going to work that day.
They were not taking a day off.
They were not going into service, they were going to work.
And to sit here and try to hijack that day, that's about public service.
It's about volunteerism, it's about doing for your fellow.
What the hell does he get off with this?
It's not what the commemorations of 9-11 are all about.
Brief time out.
We'll be back.
Stay with us.
Do you remember?
Shortly after the health care bill, Obamacare was signed into law.
A bunch of companies said, okay, we got to start taking some charges, and a bunch of companies took a billion-dollar charge here, a billion-dollar charge there, claiming that they had to report losses supported or caused by the new bill in the quarter in which the bill was signed.
So they were just obeying the law.
Henry Nostralitis Waxman, the regime, sent out subpoenas, well, letters, demanding that they show up and explain themselves.
Because everybody knows that Obamacare was going to save people money.
So here, then this is this this gave rise to my calling this whole bunch of regime because here you obey the letter of the law, you do everything you're supposed to do, and you put out one bad piece of news that actually blames the regime for something.
They call you on it, call you up there, do everything you're supposed to do.
Regime will still get you.
The regime is back.
Kathleen Sibelius says she is keeping a list of insurance companies that are raising premiums, demanding that they be honest and say it has nothing to do with Obamacare.
The regime is still on the prowl.
Kathleen Sabillius, some insurers have been attributing part of their 2011 premium increases to Obamacare.
She warned there will be zero tolerance for this type of misinformation and unjustified rate increases.
What she really means is the government's gonna prohibit insurers from doing business if reality is not politically convenient.
The point of Obamacare is to run the private insurance industry out of existence, thereby facilitating everybody going on to the single payer plan, the exchange is the government option.
And so these insurance companies, I'm sorry, premiums are going up, and we all know that every Obama even admitted last week in Ohio.
Hey, don't be silly.
Everybody knew start adding 32 million people health care rolls, prices are gonna go up.
Well, yeah, well, Miss Sibelius is implying today that it's gonna be free.
These insurance companies raising rates, but a regime's gonna gum gun inform.
The regime is taking notes.
The regime is keeping a list.
Here's John of Columbia, Tennessee.
John, great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hello.
John, is you there?
Yes.
Nice to have you on the program, sir.
Good.
I'd like to bring back the topic of uh Sarah Palin.
Yeah.
Where would the uh number of Republicans that have been running now be without her?
We have we would have lost a number of races.
Excellent point.
And on top of that, why is it that we in the upper crest or whatever you want to call it, they cannot seem to come to terms with Sarah Palin.
You mentioned her name, and uh, they just try avoid it, try try and stay away from it.
Why are they doing this?
There are a lot of people.
We have advanced a theory today based on a blogger called the Chicago Boys that it's all about status.
Uh I I think however you strip it away, it is about ruling class versus everybody else.
And she's not it.
She does not, she didn't punch your right tickets.
She didn't go to the right school, she didn't know the right people, she doesn't have the right background, and and she's a threat as a result, especially to those who have a tenuous membership in the ruling class.
Especially a threat to those whose uh membership in the ruling class is not all that solid.
And so the the notion of what's inferior must be maintained and upheld so that some people can feel superior and thus qualified to be in the ruling class.
I think it's probably comes as close as anybody is gonna get to explaining it.
Here is Gary in uh Fort Eustace, Virginia.
Nice to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
Love the show, and by the way, beautiful pictures on Facebook.
Thank you.
Um I'm gonna I'm doubly nervous here because uh frankly, my heart is racing more than when mortars were falling around me in Baghdad.
Um, I'm calling to say the uh host is wrong, which is definitely set up for failure.
Um on the Delaware chairman, I believe his name is Ross.
He's not saying Castle's a conservative.
He's trying to nationalize the race and say, vote for Castle, eat the excrement sandwich, and we'll get conservative, real Republicans from the red states to run the committees.
Oh, okay.
Well, they the Washington Post just has his quote.
That's what I was reading.
He said, quite frankly, I don't know what the goal is here.
If they really want to see conservatives as chairman of committees in the United States Senate, they'd step back and allow Mike Castle to become the next U.S. Senator, he'll win the general election, and she won't.
So what he's saying is Castle's never going to be a chairman.
He's saying he's trying to the way we would say when you vote for a conservative Democrat in Nebraska, it's really a vote for Nancy Pelosi, because when they vote for to be the Speaker of the House, her policies, the liberal San Francisco views are going to be what's going to dominate the week.
Okay, I get you.
I see.
I see.
Well, here's the thing about that.
Um if you if you look, if you want to compare this to the the uh the so-called uh blue dogs in the House being elected to give Pelosi the majority, that's all true.
For it to be true on the Republican side, we would have to also conclude that a majority of senators in a new Republican majority in the Senate are conservative.
And that's not the case.
I mean, there there's there's there's no evidence that Mike Castle is going to support a slew of conservative causes or legislation.
I'm not I'm not looking.
I'm not trying to pick a fight with this chairman, and it's a Washington Post story, and there could be a out of context here or even a misquote.
Well, what I'm what I'm really focusing on here is that uh we have to understand we face a crossroads in the country.
There are a lot of people who think we are on our last legs as a representative republic.
And that there has never been a greater opportunity to write now to contrast conservatism and what really works and what's going to roll back this government and make it smaller and less intrusive.
And we don't need to play around with rhinos and just get the Republicans in power, because look where that got us in 2006.
You need conservatives.
People are genuinely interested in saving the future of the country.
And reversing some of this outrageous Obamaism that has been implemented.
And a fear that the Rhino Republicans just are cut out for it.
They're not interested in it.
Uh, they don't want to do that kind of heavy lifting, and they frankly don't agree that we're in that big a problem or face that big a challenge.
That they're more oriented toward getting their power back for the sake of having their power.
So that's where the um dividing line here really is.
A lot of people saying, okay, if we have 51 seats in the Senate, but a vast majority of them of the people that get us to 51 are like Mike Castle, and we really do not have a conservative majority.
And uh it's it's why why have a bunch of Susan Collins's and and and Olympia snows?
I mean, there's no different than that.
What what good are they nine times out of ten for conservatism, and especially at this juncture where we've I mean it's nutcracking time, as they say.
This in i i if if if we, if we conservatives had been as successful in a year and a half, advancing our agenda as this guy's been, we'd be having parties.
Look at what this guy's done in a year and a half, folks.
Nationalizing all these industries and companies, destroying the health care system in a year and a half.
Imagine what's gonna happen if there's not any break.
Somebody's not able to stop this.
Imagine what four years of this is gonna look like.
That's why there are people thinking on a scale of one to ten, ten being country finished, we're at eight.
So politics is usual, Republican Party politics out the door.
The traditional standard rhino republicanism is not going to stop the direction we're headed.
We need people who are gonna stop this, who'll be consistently voting and supporting efforts to stop this.
It has to be stopped, not compromised with.
Plain and simple.
It's not just the same old days, the usual days were okay, it's a Democrat in the White House now for four or eight years, but we'll get it back.
Let's just um trade power here and get along as best we can.
We've never faced this radical.
A president I don't even think Woodrow Wilson or FDR.
Maybe close, but we've certainly not in my lifetime have we ever faced anything this radical.
And there's no indication it's going to improve.
There's no indication this administration thinks anything they're doing is wrong.
I mean, look at the numbers out today.
We're going to have record poverty reported in this country.
Record poverty rate.
A record poverty rate.
And the AP said, oh, it's just a sad shame that this is happening during Obama's second year.
I mean, Pluff and Axel Rod on the Sunday show saying we're headed in the right direction, that my God, we'd be in even worse shape it hadn't been for them.
That if Republican policies hadn't changed, my gosh, where would it's the exact opposite.
So what you're faced with out there, what we're faced with is a tremendous millions and millions of Americans.
Who are not looking at Republican Party first.
They're looking at policy first, conservatism, stopping this.
People that are interested once again in their children and grandchildren having a future.
Does not include rampant high taxation, indebtedness, and an ongoing increasing erosion of freedom and liberty.
It's serious.
And some of them think the Republicans don't see it that bad.
Back after this.
Ladies and gentlemen, if I may, let me cut through all the noise and make the complex understandable.
It's very simple.
Republican chairmanships are not going to roll back Obama ism.
Conservatism is the only thing that's going to roll this back.
The only thing it's going to ever have a prayer of repealing health care is not Republican chairmanships.
It's not Republican majorities, it is conservatives.
There is a conservative ascendancy.
It is outrageous that it is being fought within the Republican Party.
I understand the Democrats not wanting it to happen, but inside the Republican Party, it's outrageous for this to be going on.
it is.
We need wild-eyed conservatives to roll this back.
The same old Republican Party just won't do it.
Too many of them too eager to put a Republican stamp on Obama's agenda.
It's the power.
They think that there's something to be gained by getting along.
Something to be gained by showing cooperation.
Those days are long gone.
According to the Gallup poll, there is only one thing Obama has passed that people approve of, and that's financial reform, and it's only because they don't know what's in it yet.
Congress hasn't done one thing that a majority of Americans approve of.
Not one thing.
And not even the Republican Party is listening to this.
Republican Party's still more concerned with making sure that the old elders are rewarded and the old war horses are rewarded, regardless of their ideology or policy points of view.
I mean, that's party politics.
It is what it is.
There's really nothing new about that.
These are just different times.
Different times that call for truly drastic and desperate measures.
The American public is fed up.
They want to draw a line in the sand as Ground Zero Mosque shows that.
The rejection of Republican designated candidates shows that.
Thank you.
I mean, it it's it's patently obvious.
And of course, Republican power brokers structures fighting it.
And that's what people don't understand.
Why would they?
Because for the longest time, people have thought Republicans equal conservative.
And it's not the case.
At this dinner party I was telling you about on Saturday night.
Somebody brought up the fact that Wall Street people.
Everybody thinks of them as rock rib big business Republicans, the evil rich and so forth.
How come they all supported Obama?
And one of the guests said that's very simple.
Their wives have them henpecked.
Their wives are making them do it.
And I said, you know, you got a point.
That's why they're anti-prolifers, because they're wives.
All these Northeastern liberal Republicans, they get they don't want to hear their wives complaining about the Southerners and the pro-lifers and so forth, and they don't want to go to the conventions with these people.
It's a lot of forces being marshaled here.
But standard run of the mill every day.
Republicans are not going to roll this stuff back.
They don't have the desire to.
They want to roll the sleeves up and do it.
It's just the latest evolution where the country's going.
Let's manage it the best we can.
That's their point of view.
We'll fight it on the margins.
And it's it's a tipping point, and it's also illustrative of ruling class versus as Mr. Codvilla calls us, the country class.
And there's less and less tolerance now.
The the days where the ruling class were thought to be best and brightest and smarter than everybody else, those days are over.
The average American doesn't think that of them anymore.
Used to be, but they don't.
Get this.
New York Daily News.
Identity theft pleads guilty to stealing $500,000 to buy Rolex watches.
Designer bags...
Jewelry.
Every consumer's nightmare.
An identity theft of big exquisite tastes.
This particular guy is a 28-year-old Nigerian-born student.
He pleaded not guilty to charges he swiped the identities of 760 victims, stole 500 grand, and bought Rolex watches, Louis Vuitton bags, and jewelry at Tiffany and Company.
Bad enough he was heading off to Zales.
He went to Tiffany.
Don't let it happen to you.
There's a company out there called LifeLock, and they have the best identity alert system there is, and they will stop this.
Oftentimes as it's happening.
By the way, are you uh such and such plan to pluck down X and X for what?
No, I'm here at home.
Well, somebody's trying to steal your identity.
We've caught them.
Life Lock.
Very simple, very inexpensive.
800-440-4833.
As I say, the best li uh identity alert system that there is.
They have they'll take your social security number, but they will not sell it and give it away to anybody.
Other competitors do, some of them do.
It's the one outfit you can trust having your social security number there have it to stop others from using it.
Life Lock offer code Rush.
That's how you save 10%.
800-440-4833.
Eric in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Great to have you, sir on the EIB Network Hive.
Thanks, Russ.
Um, hey, drop the name of uh Tara Favacis to you.
She's a great talk show host down here in Charlotte.
Uh suggested Jason Lewis years ago you put him on.
You need a lady on, and we got a wonderful lady down here in Charlotte who you who I think you'd love if you ever got a chance to listen to it.
But uh wanted to drop a word here on uh my frustration, as I'm sure many other conservatives have with the current crop of uh uh Republican leaderships here and and their thrust.
New Gilrich was a visionary.
He he gave us the uh contract uh with America and and he's just an ideologue.
I hope he runs for president and just love his ideas.
Uh he may have some problems there with of course his marriage issues, but I think we can overcome that if if he's really put forward.
But the problem is these guys aren't visionaries.
I wonder if there's someone other than Boehner that you like.
I like Eric Hanner, I like uh Mike Pence, uh Thad McCotter and so on, but you know, Boehner is great, he knows a lot, he's good, but there's some inspiration that he just doesn't bring, uh but he needs to at least put forth some sort of thing to inspire this election.
This is a golden opportunity that we're missing, even though it looks like we may get the majority.
The problem is that uh, you know, it could be even bigger if there's some sort of vision, just like the contractor with America, something with the title of retaking or claiming back our even maybe get rid of Obama care, uh something to that effect, if you know what I'm trying to say.
Well, there are a lot of people who think that the Republicans ought to be offering more of a policy-oriented agenda to have a mandate.
Uh that it's not enough just to say I'm not a Democrat, although it is.
See, that's the Baylor, they don't have to do any more than that to win.
And if they don't have to, they won't.
They're not, they're not gonna take a risk in offending anybody.
This is the thing that bothers a lot of us.
Uh, and and that is they they uh they still walk into a room thinking they have to prove they're not racist, sexist, big and homophobe.
That they have that that everybody thinks this, they believe it, and so they think they have to first prove it they're reasonable.
And that I'll tell you, that is a one of the big bugaboos that I face is one of the things that just really irritates me to no end.
I is that this this desire to show that I'm a reasonable and uh you aren't.
And you know it's typified one of one of the best examples of this, uh uh uh peace be upon him, is Jack Kemp.
In the vice presidential debate with Al Gore back, I guess it was in 1996, Al Gore's up there praising Kemp for not being a racist and a bigot like so many in his party are.
And Jack Kemp said thank you, rather than excoriate Gore for having that view of Republicans in general.
And it's because it's easy.
It's it's it's easy to take the praise, easier to take the compliments, eager easy to stand out.
So we have people who who want to, you know, be the most reasonable man in the room.
And the Democrats are out there trying to portray themselves as the smartest people in the room.
And all too often Republicans want to be seen by the media as the most reasonable man in the room.
This is another quail-eye explanation for why we have so many so-called conservatives in the media who are not conservatives.
They want to be seen as reasonable.
They don't want to be seen as as uh as wild-eyed and uh and crazy and extreme and radical, uh, like uh like some of these conservatives are.
So they want to be seen as reasonable, and so they write things and they say things.
Well, I can see that.
I can also see it this way.
But I think if I were to, and of course, just a bunch of mush, they don't take a stand on anything, they hope they'll be perceived as reasonable.
And that's not gonna cut it.
I mean, is it is it better to appear to be reasonable or determined to produce the best result for the greatest number of people.
Obviously, it's better to be determined to produce the best result for the greatest number of people.
John Boehner, face the nation.
If the only option I have is to vote for those at 250 and below, of course I'm gonna do that, but I'm gonna do everything I can to make sure that we expand the current tax rates for all Americans.
Now, Boehner's doing two things.
He's trying to appear reasonable there, but he also knew that he was being set up.
Because if he had come out against tax cuts for the middle class, that's what they were setting him up for.
They were setting him up, and they already had ads run.
They just knew that Boehner would, if you don't give tax cuts for the rich, I'm not gonna be for them for anybody.
Then they couldn't wait to run that ad.
But he knew it was coming, and so he went the reasonable route on them.
So he I can give him a pass on it in this in this instance, but that is one of the things that and by the way, reasonable according to whose standards.
Is it not reasonable according to theirs?
We let the liberals, the media, everybody define what's reasonable.
And that we want to we have people who want to fit into their definition of it.
Well, right now uh Reasonable is not on the ballot.
Reversing Obamaism and defeating it is what the American people want.
And a majority of them, by the way.
Including larger than ever numbers of independence.
The so-called precious middle.
Back in a moment with the next exciting broadcast segment.
More phone calls ahead as well.
Stay tuned.
Sir Douglas Quintet.
She's about a mover.
This is Harold in Houston.
Harold, welcome to the EIB Network.
Great to have you here, sir.
I can't believe it.
All right.
If I get to say what I want to say, you ain't ready for me.
Uh maybe I am.
Give me a shot.
Okay.
Uh I'm 69 years old.
Uh uh on the 28th of this month, and I've never voted.
I'm gonna vote.
Why are you gonna vote for the first time this time?
Well, I uh for 42 years uh I've I've been frustrated with the system uh that uh that uh my vote ain't gonna count.
The elites just gonna put whoever they want.
The news media's gonna put whoever they want in.
But I I came to a conclusion that uh I'd be voting by not voting, that someday somebody would come along and want my vote and say what I say and want what I want, and I would vote for them, and I'm seeing the conservative movement and the Tea Party as the people that want my vote.
Here they are.
I want to vote.
And but a picture me walking in the booth, the voting booth, and I don't know what I'm gonna see.
I'm uh I know all kind of tricks are pulled to to disguise and manipulate you in the vo you vote.
I don't know how to see through it.
Is there some way I want to vote all incumbents out from the smallest office up.
Uh they failed.
Uh I want to send my Mr. Smith to Washington.
All right.
Well, the first thing to do in this regard is don't vote for anybody with a Democrat or a D next to their name.
That's half that's that's over half the battle, Harold.
Now, at in Texas, I don't think you're gonna have much of a problem because most of the Republicans on the ballot in Texas are not gonna be rhinos.
Okay.
You're gonna have some out there, but but but uh uh the odds that you so I'm safe going Republican.
Yeah, well just using the R. Yeah with with reservations, yes.
Uh, but certainly much safe.
Don't vote for any Democrat.
Whatever.
Uh no way.
No way, no, no, no, no, no.
You will not, there's no not not one Democrat's a member of the Tea Party, which is what's got you jazzed.
Yeah.
Yeah, I'm on I'm on fire.
Uh I want to I I waited till uh showed the whites in their eyes.
Now I'm ready to pull my musket out and shoot it.
Well, yeah, figuratively speaking, of course.
Uh yeah.
Yeah.
Do you actually have a musket?
Yeah.
Yeah.
I thought you might.
A vote.
My vote is.
Oh, your vote's the musket.
Yeah, okay.
I'm sorry.
That's okay.
That's okay.
Look, uh, you just stay tuned to this program.
Oh, I uh I do.
All right.
Well then you'll you'll you'll receive proper guidance at the proper time.
Uh and the second thing I wanted to know was uh uh it's my honest concern that as soon as I register as a Republican or independent that I'm gonna be audited.
Knowing how the elite use the the IRS and the FBI, uh as anybody ever uh complained.
No, that's that's um that may be a factor whether you get health care in ten or fifteen years.
Uh five years.
But it's not no, it's it's not a guaranteed audit.
Uh particularly if you vote independent.
But if you want to register Democrat and vote republic, you can do that too.
It's not a problem.
And from the political today, vulnerable uh actually it's just a vulnerable Democrats duck.
Public events.
They can't defend their actions on any level, so they are hiding.
Never before has there been a greater opportunity to uh relegate this ideology to the ash heap.
Never before.
And that's why the American people are uprising and demanding conservatism.
It's why it's in the ascendancy.
We'll see you tomorrow, folks.
Have a wonderful Monday.
▲
Export Selection