All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 20, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:32
August 20, 2010, Friday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Uh-huh.
The Department of Energy is now publicizing job creation benefits of the stimulus.
They have jobs created, jobs saved, and now they've added a new category.
Lives touched by the stimulus.
I'm not Kitch right here.
Greetings, folks.
Welcome back.
Rush Limbaugh from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida.
It's open line Friday.
Where the views expressed men are host on this program are now documented to be almost always right.
99.6% of the time.
Our telephone number is 800-282-2882, and open line Friday means you can talk about pretty much whatever you want to talk about.
I am not making this up.
The Department of Energy is now publicizing the job creation benefits of the stimulus with a new metric called Lives Touched.
Yeah, okay, as in, like we've been screwed.
This counts any person who may have billed a funded project for any work time, like two hours, whenever, and it counts workers at firms supplying inputs for projects funded by the government.
The Department of Energy people have to be careful to check to see if they don't end up counting more lives touched than the U.S. or world population here, folks.
I'm not kidding.
They've added now lives touched to the stimulus.
Lives touched will soon be part of the vernacular.
Sure.
The source of this is a July 29, 2010 GAO report, pages 26-28.
Lives touched.
You know, this we've been talking about it a little bit over the course of the busy broadcast today.
The Democrats'new marching orders, talking points, the Democrats are now counseled against claiming the law will reduce costs and deficits, the health care law.
They're not supposed to do that.
Now, just when you think that no news story could compete with this Ground Zero Mosque, Or Pelosi demanding investigations of the people who oppose it, or the media polling whether or not our president is a Muslim, along comes this.
Now I've got an idea.
OSHA might want to issue new safety regulations for elected Democrats, and that is hard hats.
Because these people are going to get pelted when they run around.
Charlie Cook, by the way, the noted uh uh what is he, uh political consultant, uh advisor, master Paul Stirling.
This this guy, number one in the ruling class of this stuff.
It's like, you know, those old commercials when E.F. Hutton speaks, people.
When Charlie Cook says something, the ruling class stops what it's doing and listens.
And Charlie Cook is saying it's over.
Republicans will win the House.
It's not even a question now.
Charlie Cook says it.
And so now the Democrats are being sent out by their bosses.
They're being warned, by the way, when you go out to campaign, do not talk about how health care is going to reduce the deficit or it's going to lower costs, because it isn't going to do that.
What you're supposed to do is start talking about all the improvements in actual health care.
So Obamacare was going to bring the cost curve down.
This was its purpose.
This is why it was made permanent.
It was going to reduce the deficit.
If we didn't do this, the deficit would be forever out of control.
So here we here we come up with a permanent program now that was totally sold to us on lies and fraud and deceit, which we knew at the time.
Now, this health care side show slideshow that advises the Democrats on what to say, what not to say, is a blatant acknowledgement that Obamacare was pushed through Congress on the basis of a lie.
I want to go back to his immaculation speech I want to go back to his When Imam Obama was immaculated.
He said our health care is too costly.
And then he expanded on that in his speech on health care to Congress in September of 2009.
Remember that speech?
That was the speech where Congressman Joe Wilson shouted out, you lie.
Remember that?
In that speech, Imam Obama said, put simply, our health care problem is our deficit problem.
Nothing else even comes close.
These are the facts.
Nobody disputes them.
The plan I'm announcing tonight would meet three basic goals.
It will slow the growth of health care costs for our families, our businesses, and our government.
That's what Imam Obama said.
Nobody disputes it.
That was then.
As with all of his promises, there's an expiration date.
The expiration date on this one has arrived.
That's the speech that Joe Wilson shouted, you lie when Obama's out there talking about how his health care plan is going to permanently reduce the deficit, lower health care costs, and now the Democrats told, don't say it.
Because Obamacare would have had a sunset provision locked in if it did not claim to reduce the deficit.
That's some new fangled law that they've had in the budget requirements for a while.
The tax cuts have to sunset because the CBO said they wouldn't reduce the deficit.
If it doesn't reduce the deficit, then it it's got to be ended at some point.
So they had to say that health care was going to reduce the deficit in order to make it permanent.
So this is folks, we would lie to scam.
This is this is fraud and deceit, and its admission now by the Democrats with this slideshow is profound.
Remember all of this?
To get Obamacare through the reconciliation process without a sunset provision, the CBO claimed it would reduce the deficit by 118 billion dollars.
Remember they were they were massaging and manipulating this to say that it was never going to cost more than a trillion because that's what the Iraq war had cost, and the regime was out there saying, ah, health care is going to cost less than the Iraq war.
It was all lies.
And Joe Wilson shouted that.
And look what happened to him.
So now we have...
Look, it's just it's it's unconscionable.
This entire regime has been a lie.
It is an ongoing lie.
They continue to lie when they say that these oh the CBO is out on the Bush tax cuts.
Get this.
The CBO, the nonpartisan CBO.
I always love it when they put that in the description.
The nonpartisan CBO says that extending the Bush tax cuts would have a temporary and immediate positive impact on the economy, but it would ruin the deficit by 2020.
Now, would somebody explain that to me?
The Bush tax cuts, if left in place would have an immediate benefit to the economy and its rebound, its recovery and to economic growth.
But the deficit would become unmanageable by 2020.
So what are we to do here?
How can both of those be true?
Somebody needs to tell me how in hell we can have those tax cuts be an immediate economic boom leading to an out-of-control deficit.
Well, it doesn't make sense.
That's another lie.
And it's the lie that says tax cuts reduce revenue.
That tax cuts add to the deficit.
You and I all know that that's not true.
It's all academic anyway.
Anybody who thinks these tax cuts are going to be extended.
I mean, that is a triumph of emotion over common sense like I can think of no other example.
You've got Geithner out there saying that this isn't going to happen.
Obama's out there saying that it isn't gonna happen.
People are making it sound like this has got a chance.
It ought to.
These tax cuts ought to be extended, but I just I don't I don't I really do not see it happening.
New Democrat message.
Improve health care.
Don't talk costs.
Don't talk costs.
Talk about how all the benefits.
That's not a big deal.
It's now health care, actual health care, much better.
Key White House allies dramatically shifting their attempts to defend health care legislation, abandoning claims that it'll reduce costs and deficit instead stressing a promise to improve it.
And again, the only reason this was in there was to make it permanent.
It has to the if if a program expands the deficit by law, it has to have a sunset, it has to end.
And they want Obamacare to be perpetual.
So they had to lie that it will reduce the deficit.
118 billion dollars.
Big whoop.
All a lie.
Everything they have said about it is a lie.
Gotta take a break.
We'll come back.
Your phone calls, and we still a lot of audio sound bites that are good.
I haven't gotten to.
All that coming up right after this.
It's open line Friday.
I am Rush Limboy, your guiding light.
To Ontario, Canada.
Say hi to Francis.
Welcome to the EIB network.
We need to change union leadership, but what's with your contradiction?
Uh yeah, all right.
Yep.
I do too.
All right, I'll talk to you later.
Yep.
Bye.
All right.
We're interrupting something in Ontario, Canada.
Uh France is in Ontario, Canada.
You're on the EIB network.
Hi.
Hey, Rush, how's it going?
Very well, sir.
Thanks very much.
You bet.
Love the show, listen every chance I get.
You need to change the union leadership, by the way.
Yes, you're darn right we do.
And that's uh certainly you'll have no issue with that uh uh with me.
Uh my concern is that uh there's a contradiction on both sides of the organizing issue.
Um, not only with union leadership, but with the uh conservative view of organized labor.
Uh for example for uh I'll I'll try and simplify the argument for uh this little segment that we have so that uh it's clear to all of your listenership.
You take uh an example of uh Walmart.
Yeah.
You know, a capitalist icon, really.
Um free market icon, yeah.
Well, it is free market and it's beautiful.
Yeah.
They have 3,800 retail stores across North America.
They're not allowed in New York.
You could put mosques all over there, but you can't put one in New York, or Chicago won't let one in there.
Yeah, well, you're talking about.
And that's because of the unions uh union member that doesn't believe that that I'm in conflict.
My what I believe where I believe there is a conflict is is with the conservatives.
Oh.
Against organized labor.
Who's against it?
Walmart owes its existence to organizing.
Thirty, eight hundred retail stores.
Central purchasing power.
That allows them the ability to purchase and sell lower than the competition.
That's organizing.
No, this but this is apples and oranges.
It's not apples and oranges at all.
It is it.
Well, because the purpose That's a contradiction.
It is not it is not a contradiction at all.
Okay, yeah, yeah.
The reason for Walmart organizing, as you say, has nothing to do with why labor has organized.
Labor is not about efficiency.
Walmart's about efficiency.
Labor is about something totally different than efficiency.
Not that it's wrong.
No, no, no, I I would correct you there.
Labor, or sorry, Walmart organizing is not about efficiency.
Certainly it is.
It's about lowering costs.
Union organizing is about raising them.
It's about profit.
Yeah.
Well, I know that's a step back and look at it from your angle.
Well, what's the point?
Efficiency.
I can look at it from your angle.
There is no rush angle.
There is no rush angle.
There's right and wrong.
And I'm right.
Efficiency.
I would argue, I would argue you're definitely wrong here.
Efficiency equals profit, and there's nothing wrong with profit.
Profit is why people get hired.
Profit is how people get hired.
Now hang on a second, Raj.
Let's back up and look at it from your angle then.
What is my angle?
Walmart organizes.
That's not my angle.
That's not my Walmart's angle.
Let's look at Walmart's angle.
Wait, no, no.
You have you haven't even explained you don't know what my angle is.
You said let's look at it from my angle.
I don't know.
Okay, let's look at it from Walmart's angle.
Walmart organizes.
They want to screw people.
No, no.
Not to screw people.
By making a property.
Efficiency.
Therefore.
You said they're not efficient.
Pardon me?
You said they're not efficient.
I have never said they're not efficient.
Obviously they are.
I said that's why they organize.
You disagreed with me.
I disagreed that they did it to increase profit.
Efficiency.
Efficiency and profit.
I mean, this is fine.
Same thing.
But then your position is, your position would be that Walmart employees are the mindless minions.
No.
To support Walmart.
No.
From each according to his ability.
Is that where we're going here?
No, no.
If you want to know my angle, I mean I'd be glad to tell you.
Well, I can tell you my angle.
My angle is organizing is organized capitalism.
What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
Right.
Okay.
Now I'm not suggesting either here or you go out and you organize your contract next year where you get more money for doing less work and more sick days.
That's not the case at all.
And it will take your dues to elect Democrats.
It's not the case at all.
You tell me where that's where Walmart's doing.
Walmart organizes.
So they can approach their suppliers and say, We can buy sixty-eight thousand pairs of Levi's jeans this year.
Where our competition is going to purchase sixty-eight.
Walmart is not organizing.
Walmart is growing.
Walmart is expanding because they make and sell products at prices people can afford and are willing to pay.
My angle on Walmart is very simple.
It is their company, it is this country.
If they want to have a non-union workforce, that's their right, that is their business, and there is nothing illegal, and there is nothing wrong, and there is nothing insidious, and there is nothing criminal about it.
If Walmart thinks their business will be more productive and more profitable, which means if all those criteria are met, it means that their customers are happy.
If Walmart quote-unquote organizes so that their customers are happy and content, they will succeed.
If Walmart's purpose is to organize to keep a bunch of rabble-rousing union people happy, then their customers are going to be of secondary concern, and they will not maybe exist like General Motors and Chrysler.
Ahem, ahem.
Until they were bailed out by Imam Obama.
That's my angle.
I will add to it.
I have no quarrel if anybody wants to join a union.
I have said this throughout my star-studded radio career.
If you want to join the pig iron workers, go right ahead.
If you want to join the Teamsters, go right ahead.
If you want to join the auto workers, if you have to to work, fine.
Go do it.
It's America.
You want to be part of a union, go right ahead, but understand what's happening to you.
You cease to exist as an individual.
You become part of a unit.
Your union negotiators are responsible for whatever they can get the employer to pay you.
And to get any more than that, you're going to have to go do overtime or what have you.
How good you do your job compared to the next guy is irrelevant.
It's not merit-based.
It's time-based.
Put in the time.
No matter what you do, you're going to get paid.
But the same time that happens, you can't sit around and get mad at entrepreneurs who have more money than you do on the basis that it isn't fair.
They made a choice to become entrepreneurs, to take risks, start businesses, create products and services, what have you, borrow money, risking everything, and in some cases it pays off, and they end up with a car and a house.
While other people are members of unions or their other level of employment.
Nobody's the same.
Nobody's equal.
Nobody has the same ambition.
No two people have the same talents, ambition, desires, educational results.
It's too complex.
Unions, however, exist so that management can deal with big labor costs in a systemized way where they can calculate them over a long-term number of years because they have a lot of people doing the same thing.
And it makes sense for certain companies to have a unionized workforce.
Other companies do not want to have a unionized workforce.
For them and the way they've organized, the way they've put themselves together, it makes more sense for them not to be.
Neither company, the one that has a union or the one that doesn't, is bad.
Neither one is a crime crime.
Neither one is anti-anything.
They simply are trying to turn a profit so you can stay in business.
And they do it while at the same time trying to keep their customers happy and content.
Because if they don't do that, buy by profit, close up shop.
They do not exist to provide health care and sick days and vacation days and veterinarian days for the employees.
That's my angle.
All right.
Ladies and gentlemen, many of you are probably wondering what just happened here.
Now I want to explain to you what just happened, and I want to, in the process, um, do something I very seldom do, and that is tell you how good I am at what I do.
What just happened on this program was we tuned in to a caller, has been on hold for about a half hour.
It set up there, he wanted to talk about uh union guy and my attitude about unions or whatever.
That's all I knew.
We went to him, he's on the phone talking to somebody else.
He said, We need somebody new to hit up the union.
So I listened to that.
I have no idea.
This a guy starts talking to me as though we are in the middle of a conversation already.
He starts telling me what I said and what I think, and this is the first time I've ever talked to the guy.
He's from Canada, and that's all I know.
So I went along with it.
I had four minutes left in this segment.
I had four minutes to make chicken salad.
Snerdley gave me chicken crap.
I had four minutes to make chicken salad here.
So I said to myself, okay, I've got to join this as though it is what it is.
This guy thinks I've said something.
He thinks we've been talking about it for a while now.
It sounded to you like this is the middle of a conversation that you didn't hear the beginning of.
Well, it was, and I didn't hear the beginning of it either.
So let me tell you what just happened.
We had a guy from Canada.
Canada is more than twice organized union as we are.
They've got 30% organized labor versus 12% here.
In some cases, I've seen it's 8% here.
Canada has been fighting like hell to try to organize 200 or so Walmart stores.
So I suspect who that guy was was a union goo, uh, organizer.
Canada has a version of card check.
Card check is where you can force companies to unionize in a sacred ballot.
So nobody knows how anybody voted.
They're trying to get that done here.
Walmart is one of Canada's largest employers, and they're not unionized, and therefore they must be punished.
Now that I'm assuming all of that when I hear this guy on the phone.
When I hear Ottawa Canada starts talking about unions, I hear him say we need a new union head or leadership or whatever.
You throw it all together, we're in the middle of a conversation that really hasn't started.
So you're out there listening to the what the hell is this?
I'm doing the same thing, except I'm host.
I can't sit here and say what the hell is this?
I gotta play along with it.
I gotta go along with it.
My brain's 125 miles an hour at that point.
So what happened was this.
I had a guy call me from Canada who was saying I have a confused, irrational statement based upon a flawed premise.
I have a position that you've taken that I know is wrong, but I'm gonna stick it to you anyway, and I'm gonna make you untangle your nonsensical statements in four minutes or less.
That's what he's telling me.
And I'm sitting here saying, okay, to make this pay off.
I'm saying to myself to my well, I'm listening to this guy, well, he's trying to tell me my angle on unions.
I'm asking myself, how can I make this pay off?
Have you not hit the button and go to a different show?
And I know you wouldn't do that because there isn't any.
But theoretically, how do I take this seemingly nonsensical?
What the hell is this phone call and make sense out of it?
And so that's what I did.
And I just decided at some point, if a guy's gonna tell me what my angle is, he may also know what it is.
It's up to me to tell him.
So I did.
Creating an efficient business is not organizing.
Organizing is what unions do after an efficient business has been created to make the business inefficient.
Now I have no quarrel with union people.
None.
Everybody has to eat.
And not everybody's the same.
And if people want to join unions, that's all well and good.
My problem is with union leaders, and with particularly public employee union leaders who are socialists, who are liberals, who are essentially anti-free market.
I'm sorry.
I'm free market.
I'm not going to peacefully coexist with somebody who's anti-free market on some basis of human rights or civil rights.
It's just that simple.
Now here's another one.
Denver.
John.
It's not a question about Tim Tebow and his injured ribs and whether he's going to play in the next preseason game.
Welcome to the program, John.
How are you?
Doing well and yourself.
Uh fine, sir.
Thank you.
That's cool.
This is an honor, man.
I never would have thought I'd be able to talk to you.
Now here's this is a good caller because he doesn't know how I feel and is not telling you how I feel.
He's asking me.
Thanks.
Very good of you.
Thank you very much.
Yeah, hey, I was wondering what do you what do you think about Barack Obama personally?
I mean, we all know where you stand on him politically, but what do you think about him personally?
I remember when you talk about Clinton, he used to say he's a great guy to go have a beer with, but you never agreed with his politics.
Yeah.
Um, well, Obama doesn't strike me as a guy you'd want to go out, have a beer with and chase women after a game, like you would with Clinton.
Yeah.
Um strikes me personally as a guy who has been covered for all his life, that has he's been told that he's the smartest guy in every room.
He's never had to work really hard for what he's got because he's always had a way paved for him for obvious reasons and for uh he thinks he's much smarter than he is, much more worldly than he is, isn't arrogant.
Um I think he tends to be condescending toward people he thinks are not smart as he is, and I think it's very typical of people like that.
He's he's real world ignorant.
Huh, that makes sense.
I don't think there's much common sense to Barack.
I think I think pure theory, uh faculty room chit-chat is what has created Obama's Philosophy, life experience, and so forth.
Sure.
But personally, beyond that, I've I mean I don't know him.
I've I've I've never met him.
Yeah.
All I know is that the people who know him best are taking polls out there, the American people, ask him if they think he's a Muslim or not.
Yeah.
You have a thought on that?
Whether he's Muslim or not?
Yeah.
I I really don't know.
I'm not sure.
Do you do you care?
No, I just know he's not good for the country, so it doesn't bother me.
Yeah, exactly.
I don't care either.
I'm more concerned about his destroying the economy than what he you know, what his religion is or isn't.
Oh, sure, sure.
I mean, if if I could, I work in construction, I actually fixed construction equipment, and we lost a lot of business for that.
Just because all the construction died, all the housing development went away shortly after he went into office.
Yeah, talk to the people in the oil business in the Gulf.
Yeah, yeah, I work for a few of those people too.
Talk to the people in the housing business.
Uh, thank you, Barney Frank, and Chris Dodd.
Yeah, exactly.
Financial market.
Yeah, that's my big now.
Thanks, John, thanks for the call.
Let's go to audio soundbite number five.
This classic illustration.
We're told, and we're told all during the campaign, there's never been a guy like Obama in our politics, right?
Clean articulate, never anybody smarter, never anybody better able to unite people that we've never ever, we've never had anybody like this.
Smart is a whip.
This guy is so smart we can't keep up with him.
The reason he's in trouble on the mom, Margaret Carlson actually said, I think, that the reason he's in trouble is we just can't keep up with he's got to slow down for us.
We're we're we're so pedestrian that we can't see the big picture on the ground zero mosque.
Obama's gotta understand that and then slow it down, okay.
So let's go to uh Joe Scarborough's fledgling show today on MSNBC, where he had Washington Post a po uh uh columnist, uh Eugene Robinson.
Wait, Eugene Robinson, what was he saying um, Maureen Dowd?
They had a it said um Oh, yeah, Eugene Robinson said Bush needs to come out and save Obama on the mosque business.
Because Obama is so smart, he's so far ahead of us.
He needs Bush to come out and endorse it so that the people will understand.
Yeah, wrote a column about Obama's uh well, Bush needing to help Obama.
His latest column is about the stunning successes of Obama.
I kid you not, stunning successes.
Current column is about Obama's stunning successes.
We're right on track, folks.
Now, keep this all in mind as you listen to this sound bite.
Eugene Robinson was asked a question by Scarborough.
Uh Obama's not a good communicator.
He can't boil issues down to their essence like Reagan.
Not even close.
That's Scarborough.
Now you would think at Eugene Robinson, huh?
The hell you say.
He's the smartest guy in the room.
What do you mean he's the greatest communicator we've ever had?
He can use a Negro dialect when he wants to.
Harry Reid said so.
That Eugene Robinson should be insulted here.
We've been told the guy's the smartest, the best, the most brilliant, the brightest light.
Listen to Eugene Robinson's answer.
I actually think he is a great communicator, but I don't think it's a matter of overexposure.
It's a matter of impact.
It could be something as simple uh but difficult to pull off as Barack Obama finding his Peggy Noonan, the person who knows his voice better than he does, and who's able to craft those sorts of simple expressions that really get through and communicate emotion as well as content.
So what Obama needs is a speech writer.
Obama needs somebody who knows his voice better than he does.
But yet Obama's the best, I thought, Eugene.
Like Obama's smarter, brighter, wizard-like.
Post this, post that, post modern, post partisan, post president, post racial, post...
He needs a woman to come write his speeches.
To um craft simple expressions that really get through.
He's just way Too above the crowd.
So Obama, for all his brilliance, can't communicate now.
His own supporters.
Uh column today.
Recounting all of Obama's successes.
Now, another thing.
This business that Reagan couldn't tie his shoes without Peggy Noonan.
Or Michael Deaver.
Or any of his other people is a myth that needs to be shot down.
These guys, not only do they not really understand Obama, they don't understand Reagan.
They think Reagan was a dunce, amiable, likable dunce.
All about speech writing.
It is Obama that can't tie his shoes without a teleprompter, folks.
Look at these numbers from the CBO, the Congressional Budget Office.
And some people be left speechless, even economists.
But Heritage Foundation economists are anything but speechless, including one of their aces, Brian Reidel.
Brian Reidle actually uses a more realistic approach to the numbers from the CBO.
He thinks the Heritage Foundation thinks, by the way, that the national debt being held by the American public will pass 100% of gross domestic product by 2020.
By the same year, half of all income tax revenue will go to pay the debt payments on our 23 trillion dollar debt.
That's what it's expected to be.
In other words, income tax revenue will not pay for a single program.
It will just go to debt payment.
And it won't even cover all the debt payment.
Heritage has a uh a new book, Solutions for America.
Fifty-eight-page book, 123 Viable Solutions to the problems facing America.
There's a chapter called Raining in Runaway Spending and Deficits.
It's got us uh a lot of smart practical ideas that need to be discussed and implemented, like the notion of making federal wages more in line with private sector jobs.
In some cases, federal wages account benefits are twice the average wage in the private sector.
You can read the Solutions for America book free.
The Heritage Foundation, become a member.
It was released just this past Tuesday.
It's online at Askheritage.org.
Go ahead and join while you're there.
It's America's premier court a conservative organization.
Some of the finest minds inside the beltway in the country.
Six hundred and uh eighty-four thousand of us are members.
Make yourself a member as well at AskHeritage.org.
Um I promised I was gonna play this sound bite.
So we're gonna play it.
Within this context, Obama's smartest guy we've ever had, the most brilliant.
He's so smart we can't keep up with him.
We can't.
Charlie Rose and Tom Brokaw, October 30th, 2008, right before the election.
I don't know what Barack Obama's worldview is.
No, I don't know.
I don't know how he really sees where China is.
We don't know a lot about Barack Obama and the universe of his thinking about foreign policy.
I don't really know.
And do we know anything about the people who are advising them?
You know, it's an interesting question.
He is principally known through his autobiography and through very aspirational speeches.
I don't know what books he's read.
What do we know about the heroes of Barack Obama?
There's a lot about him we don't know.
Vote for him, Tuesday.
Vote too.
That's what they were of that rebellious.
Vote for him.
We don't know a damn thing about him.
Vote for quickly, Tucson, Arizona.
This is Van.
I have about a minute, 45 seconds.
I wanted to get to you.
Hi.
Hi, Rush.
Uh, listen, I don't want to be a total sycophant here, but your response to the organizer in Cleveland was in uh Canada was on the north side of brilliant.
Thank you, sir, very much.
I appreciate that.
I really do.
Um, the easiest thing in the world is to calculate the number of lives touched by the Porculus plan.
Right.
It's roughly 310 million.
Right.
Because every damn one of us will be paying for this until we're long over the last horizon.
Exactly.
Not only lives touched, lives destroyed.
Uh many, many, many.
Van, excellent timing.
That guy has uh professional possibilities.
Sense of timing is impeccable.
And we be back wrap it up right after this.
Got an exciting weekend coming up.
We start taping the Haney Project on the golf channel.
Yep, taping starts.
Um Sunday and Monday.
And uh beginning next week in Hawaii.
I'll watch Dallas Chargers first quarter, maybe uh first quarter and a half tonight.
Yeah, absolutely.
Foreclosures grind on, and higher health premiums await workers, according to media.
▲
Export Selection