All Episodes
Previous Next
July 28, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:35
July 28, 2010, Wednesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Greetings, my good friends.
Welcome back, Rush Limbaugh serving humanity simply by being here, simply by showing up and assuming my rightful place in the prestigious Attila Hun chair at the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Telephone numbers 800-282-2882, the email address Lrushbaugh at EIBNet.com.
Look, I know this is just a stay.
The Arizona ruling is just a stay, and that there's not a final ruling yet.
There will be a there'll be a trial on this.
But if you assume this law gets struck down, will the local authorities be able to ask for proof of citizenship when people register to vote?
Because right now, um the it it is it has been blocked.
The provision requiring aliens to carry immigration papers has been blocked.
The illegals do not have to carry documentation.
In other words, it's no longer illegal to be illegal in the state of Arizona, as of this ruling.
And it's it's I folks, this is it's gonna add even uh even more angst and upset people in in November when this all shakes out, because once again we have here an activist decision, not a judicial decision.
We have a judge who has ignored the law and who has ruled on the spin.
She's ruled on the spin from the ACLU.
She has ruled on the on the spin from the fake media, from the partisan political operatives in the media.
Wall Street Journal reports, uh, U.S. district judge, Susan Bolton agreed to enjoin several provisions, including one that required police officers to check the immigration status of a person stopped for an alleged other violation like speeding, if reasonable suspicion existed that the individual was illegally in the United States.
The judge also enjoined sections that required immigrants to carry papers, proving their right to live in the U.S. at all times, and another that banned undocumented workers from congregating in public places like street corners or outside stores to solicit unemployment.
The PDF of this ruling is 36 pages, and there's no way that I'm going to be able to go through all 36 pages prior to the program ends.
But I know what went on here.
I've I've summarized this as well as anybody else will.
And really, brevity is the soul of wit.
The fewest words it takes to make the point, the more powerful the point.
It's no longer illegal to be illegal in Arizona.
But you're going to have to show your ID if you're in Arizona for any reason.
To show up to vote, cash a check, use a credit card or whatever.
You are going to have to show ID.
You have to prove that you are who you are.
The people in the state of Arizona illegally are not going to have to prove it.
In Arizona.
The federal government essentially said, we don't have the resources to uh enforce the law.
We're we're we're we're we're too busy doing other things.
Arizona said essentially we'll help you.
We got a mirror image of your law anyway.
So the ACLU argument has been adopted, the argument of the government that Arizona is creating its own enforcement mechanism that runs contrary to the federal government's enforcement mechanism.
And that, of course, is a flat-out deception.
Everybody knows it.
It's a high bar to stay a law, a very high bar.
And this judge did not meet the bar.
You have a Clinton appointee.
I'm still, you know, I keep going back to this.
I'm still struck on the fact, struck by the fact that everybody told us, yeah, yeah, she's a Clinton appointee, but she's not political.
A Clinton appointee, but she's not political.
Now, this is this is from her uh ruling.
The court by no means disregards Arizona's interests in controlling illegal immigration and addressing the concurrent problems with crime, Including the trafficking of humans, drugs, guns, and money.
Even though Arizona's interests may be consistent with those of the federal government, it's not in the public interest for Arizona to enforce preempted law.
Meaning it's not in the public interest for Arizona to enforce federal law.
Meaning the state can't preempt the feds.
And Arizona said we're not preempting, we've got a mirror image law here.
But she's bought the notion there was racial profiling and discrimination and all this uh, you know, happy horse manure uh that's that's part of the American left these days.
So that's pretty much it.
You'll want to talk about it, I'm sure, in the um today.
I guess, I guess the judge is saying it's not in the public interest for Arizona to try to defend itself from an invasion.
I don't know how you look at this with any sort of common sense and come to the ruling this woman came to.
But she didn't.
She's a leftist, and she made an activist decision.
Not a judicial decision.
Other things going on in the news.
The New York Times, the Washington Post, it's everywhere.
On the surface, Gulf oil spill vanishing fast.
Concerns stay.
The oil slick in the Gulf of Mexico appears to be dissolving far more rapidly than anyone expected.
No.
There were a lot of us that expected this to happen.
It's a piece of good news that raises tricky new questions about how fast the government should scale back its response to the deepwater horizon disaster.
Come on, New York Times, scale back.
Federal government scale back in anything, its response.
The moratorium goes on, jobs shut down, drilling shut down, 135,000 jobs kaput, 20 billion dollars shaken down from British petroleum.
Speaking of that, BP said today yesterday it plans to cut its U.S. tax bill by 9.9 billion, basically 10 billion dollars, or about half the amount pledged to aid victims of the disaster by deducting costs related to the oil spill.
A portion of that could be refunded from taxes BP paid in earlier years.
The company disclosed its intentions as part of its second quarter earnings report, in which it said it would record a $32.2 billion charge to reflect the cost of the spill.
Under U.S. corporate tax law companies can take credits on up to 35% of their losses.
The credit for BP could mean, however, that taxpayers will indirectly foot part of the bill for the $20 billion shakedown that BP was uh forced to pay by Obama to compensate people and businesses harmed by the disaster.
It doesn't read that way in the Washington Post.
I use my own words to make the story accurate.
Well, I'll give a shakedown.
They're gonna cut their tax bill by 10 billion dollars.
This is said to be the taxpayer indirectly footing the bill.
Uh from uh what is this?
What what what stupid paper is this?
Uh uh what paper it is.
It doesn't say.
Gulf sp- Oh, it's USA Today.
Gulf spill has not fouled most beaches, but hurts tourism.
How did that happen?
If the spill has not fouled the vast majority of beaches, how in the hell has tourism been hurt?
Answer the media.
Answer the fake media.
Answer partisan political operatives.
If the spill has not fouled the mass majority of beaches, and yet tourism is down, tourism is down.
How?
How's that possible?
British Petroleum BP knows the U.S. tax code better than the government.
Lawyers.
They get shaken down for 20 bill, and they go out and take a charge going to reduce the shakedown to 10.
So BP is going to be paying less in taxes and penalties than Obama thought he was going to get it from them all because of U.S. tax law.
You have to love it.
So the New York Times reporters, um, partisan political operatives flying over the Gulf oil spill Sunday spotted only a few patches of sheen, and an occasional streak of thicker oil.
Radar images taken since then suggest that these few remaining patches are quickly breaking down in the warm surface waters of the Gulf.
John Amos, the president of Sky Truth, an environmental advocacy group that sharply criticized the early low estimates of the size of the leak, noted that no oil had gushed from the well for nearly two weeks.
Mr. Amos said that oil has a finite lifespan at the surface.
At this point, that oil slick is really starting to dissipate pretty rapidly.
The effect.
Nobody's happy here.
Nobody's happy.
The media's not happy they wanted a disaster.
Obama's not happy about it.
The New York Times is not happy about it.
Nobody's happy about this.
I'm happy about it, H.R. I'm always happy when I'm right, which means I'm always happy.
The effect on sea life of the large amounts of oil that dissolved below the surface is still a mystery.
Two preliminary government reports on the issue have found concentrations of toxic compounds in the deep sea to be very low.
But the reports left many questions, especially regarding an apparent decline in oxygen level.
So the good news continues to roll in, damn it.
Low levels of oil can't find the oil.
Where the hell is the oil?
And then they say later in the story, this is the most oil it's ever poured in the Gulf of Mexico and hit.
No, it's not.
The Mexicans dumped far more oil in the Gulf.
In the 80s, Ickstock 1 is what it was called.
Understanding the effects of the spill on the shorelines that were hit, including Louisiana's coastal marshes, expected to occupy scientists for years.
Federal grants no doubt will fund all of this interest.
Fishermen along the coast are deeply skeptical of any declarations of success, expressing concern about the long-term effects of the chemical dispersants used to combat the spill, and of the submerged oil, particularly on shrimp and crab larvae, that the foundation of future fishing seasons.
An unknown percentage of the oil would have been eaten by bacteria, essentially rendering the compounds harmless and incorporating them into the food chain.
But other components of the oil have most likely turned into floating tarballs that could continue to gum up beaches and marshes, which happens every day on every beach anyway, and may represent a continuing threat to some scene.
may represent, am I not representing a continuing threat too?
A three-mile by four-mile band of tar balls was discovered off the Louisiana coast Damn it, that's no reason to be happy.
While we, this is Thad Allen, the Coast Guard Admiral.
While we would like to all see the area come back as quickly as it can, I think we all need to understand that we, at least in the history of this country, we've never put this much oil into the water, and we need to take this very, very seriously.
Who cares if we have or not?
The Mexicans did.
And Mexico's still around, Texas shoreline's still around.
It was we recover.
New York Times.
And this is uh the Washington Post.
Oil from the BP blowout is degrading rapidly in the warm waters of the Gulf of Mexico, becoming increasingly difficult to find on the surface.
The head of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said today, or yesterday actually, the light crude oil is biodegrading quickly, and NOAA director Jane Lubchenko said.
We know that a significant amount of the oil is dispersed and been biodegraded by naturally occurring bacteria.
Mother Nature again.
Who's Mother Nature?
Look at me.
Mother Nature is God.
Leftists.
Notice how harder to find in the Washington Post headline, oil and gulf degrading, becoming harder to find, makes it sound like the oil's still there.
Oil is still there, like it's Hiding somewhere next to the 3.6 million jobs that have been created or saved.
We know those jobs are there too, but we can't see them.
We can't find them.
Where's the oil?
We're looking for me.
It's hiding.
It's just harder to find.
Like it's hiding next to ten years of missing heat from global warming.
But if the bacteria have eaten it, isn't it actually gone?
Quotes at the end of this story.
This is who is this as uh Well.
Uh anyway, a significant, significantly more optimistic assessment of the environmental effects of the oil well blowout came Tuesday from Edward Owens, who worked with Exxon for four years on the Alaska Valdez spill, and who has been hired as a consultant to BP.
Owens was quoted by the French news agency as saying the fragile Louisiana marshes would be close to pre-blowout condition within months, that the environmental impact on the Gulf as a whole would be quite small.
Whoa.
Uh that this something's gonna have to happen to this guy.
Doesn't he realize the permanent destruction of the Gulf is now settled science?
The permanent destruction, that's the template.
That's the narrative.
But get this.
We have a media montage from uh anchors in uh in New York City.
Rush Limbaugh was right about all of this.
Number six.
A lot of the scientists were saying that, you know, once they can cap it, that it should go right back to where it came from and that it wouldn't, you know, I mean, it's done a lot of harm already, certainly to the fishing industry.
But it it wouldn't be as bad as an accident like the Exxon Valdez because that was refined.
It's interesting.
Rush Limbach predicted this.
He said the earth is amazingly regenerative.
Mark down this day, what is it, the 28th?
Rush Limbaugh and the New York Times agree on something.
Bound to get something right, right?
I can't believe that.
It's amazing.
What does the New York Times agree with me on?
New York Times and I don't agree on anything.
They're they're they're ticked off they can't find the oil.
I said this not a mystery.
They think it's a mystery.
Anderson Cooper last night on Anderson Cooper 25.
He spoke with Louisiana State University environmental studies professor Emeritus and Overton about the spill.
Anderson Cooper said Ed, a Coast Guard official, said that the oil is in its final life cycle.
And they aren't finding much oil out there.
Uh does this mean it's gone?
Has Mother Nature and the dispersants just broken it up already, Ed?
Is it really gone, Ed?
Well, to a large extent.
Remember, the spill stopped about uh ten days ago, so and the GUF was really acclimated to to take in a 60,000 barrels a day.
So all of a sudden you have none, the bacteria there, and they are degrading very rapidly degrading what's left.
What does it mean, Ed?
What is it mean?
What does it mean for the future, Ed?
Long-term prognosis is not nearly as bad as some people have said.
I think we'll be pretty much back to normal in two to three years.
There will be some environmental indicators that won't come back for some time.
But most 90%, 90 plus percent will return to normal fairly quickly.
And I think next summer we'll we'll have a hard time finding a lot of this oil.
In general, our environment will recover.
It's amazing how resilient the environment is.
I told you this three months ago.
Back after this.
All right, when we last left Anderson Cooper 25, he was being told by Ed Overton last night, eh?
It's gonna recover very quickly down there.
Ain't gonna be any big deal.
Two years back to normal.
We're gonna be back to normal in the Gulf before Obama's finished destroying the U.S. economy.
But back on May 3rd, Anderson Cooper, one nineteen.
He had this exchange with the Earth Island Institutes, Ricky Ott about the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
There's been some truly weird talk about the Gulf oil spill, and it's coming from both sides.
Rush Limbaugh and Gene Taylor say this is just gonna break up naturally.
A, is that true?
And B, does it mean we should just let nature take its course?
It's gonna break up naturally, the same as in Alaska.
We're gonna probably wait 40 years or 50 years before it all breaks up naturally.
And what we're gonna see here probably in Louisiana with a little bit warmer temperature, maybe a little bit more rapid degradation, maybe a little less than 50 years, but who knows how much less.
They can't find it.
So here we have the discreditation of all these so-called environmentalist wacko experts.
Fifty years disaster!
Anderson Cooper 225 buying it.
Hook Lancinger, thinking I'm a nut.
Now they can't find the oil.
It's gonna be gone too free.
Can't find it.
Back to the phones.
Randy in Dallas.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello, sir.
Thank you, Rush.
You had a uh caller on earlier, was wondering what we can do in the interim before October comes, because quite frankly, this thing's gonna go right through the uh Ninth Circuit.
It's gonna have to go to SCOTUS.
But what we can do in the interim is we can join the minute men.
Anybody that can make it out to Arizona, they can they can guard our borders, they can do whatever they can do, go for it.
And that's what I'm planning to do if I sure if I sure can put it together.
Well, now what makes you think that what you're going to be doing is legal when uh law enforcement officials in Arizona cannot do what the law says they were gonna permit them to do.
Well, I don't know, Rush, but uh if they ask me for my driver's license when I'm out there, I'm gonna ask you.
What should I do?
Okay, very simple.
Great question.
If you are asked in Arizona or anywhere else, anywhere, Randy, if somebody asks you for your driver's license or any other identification, just look at them and say, uh, no habla ingless.
Good answer.
That's all you do.
Just tell them you can't speak English, you spend no habla ingless, and you're free and clear.
Simple.
Well, I encourage anybody that can do something along these lines probably needs to happen.
Well, I encourage everybody next time you're asked for ID, just tell them no habla inglés.
And and and see what happens.
Brief time out.
Back with much more.
Your phone calls included right after this.
The views expressed by the host on this program, documented to be almost always right, 99.6% of the Snurley, what are you doing out of your chair?
What are you doing out of your chair in there?
How can you screen calls of the program?
What are you looking at in there?
No, I'm not getting an answer on this, folks.
Joe in St. Louis, welcome to the EIB network.
Great to have you here, sir.
Hello.
Rush, I know that you've always told us you'll let us know when.
Yeah.
I want to know where we can go.
I don't want to be part of this anymore.
And Snerdly asked me, what do you mean by this?
We don't have a country anymore.
We don't have a nation of laws anymore.
It doesn't matter who passes a law, the people in Nebraska, whatever, that pass the immigration law, the city council overruled them.
It doesn't matter what the people in Arizona do.
I want out.
This is worse than being in a bad marriage.
I want out.
If Arizona or Alaska would secede, I'd be there in a second.
I'm ready.
I can't take this anymore.
That's what I meant yesterday when I opened the program when there are people literally depressed about the future of the country.
They're not enjoying their lives.
You you uh it's not the time to leave, though.
Joe, we're because we're gonna we're gonna need Joe.
It's not it's not time.
We're gonna need people like you.
Rush, I'm not depressed.
I see the handwriting on the wall.
We're this is what they want.
They want us to hate each other, they want us to fight with each other, and it will be total.
Rush, where did all of those busloads of people that came into Arizona today, how did they get there?
Who paid for the buses?
Where did those people come from?
You don't think it was the SCIU or somebody like that?
Or ACORN or whoever?
This is what they want.
They want us to fight and hate each other.
This has been their plan all along, and I don't want to be part of this anymore.
I have nothing left.
There's nothing that I can look look at any more that makes me proud of this country.
You know, you had six or eight or ten different people suing the state of Arizona, the ACLU.
It doesn't matter what you and I are straight thinking people do, they will find A way to crush us.
And I'm not depressed, Rush.
I just see the handwriting on.
No, you come on.
Now, Joe, you gotta be a little depressed out there after reciting that litany.
Where do you want to go?
You know what?
I'll tell you what.
I would go to Texas, Arizona, Alaska.
If Alaska decided to secede.
Well, but no, they're not no no no.
If these states don't secede, then the odds of that are very low.
Where are you gonna go?
I know.
You know what, Rush, I don't know.
Uh you know what?
I'm almost ready to cry.
Because I don't see us going back.
I don't see us.
You know, this is our fault.
For 40 years we've allowed these people to take over the schools.
Why would you wonder why you have high school teachers in California that claim that we invaded California and they hate the United States and they hate Anglos and the new black Panthers hate white.
Why do you think we have them?
Because this is what they've learned.
This is what they've been taught in the schools.
I know I asked the same question you have.
Why why we we we we sort of let this happen because nobody took it seriously enough.
We were more concerned about being civil and having civil arguments and so forth and getting along with everybody.
Nobody really took them seriously.
Nobody thought they would ever be able to accomplish this.
Nobody thought they'd be patient for 40 or 50 years to get to this point.
And they they won't let us alone.
It doesn't matter what it is.
You can look back over the last 30 or 40 years, and you're much smarter than I am.
The only reason I have any intelligence is because I'm a graduate student of the EIB.
But you can look back over the history of time.
Whatever it is, it it uh eventually it'll be reparations, it'll be a value added tax, it'll be all of these other things.
I remember a congressman talking about the value added tax on 60 minutes 20 years ago, and he said something like, We'd never get this fast.
You know, and it's the same way, legalize marijuana.
The people in California want to have a party, but you know that you and I are the ones who are going to pay the bill because eventually the government, Obama or whomever, is going to bail them out.
And I just can't do it.
I do not if they want to be insane, they could be insane in California, but they're not insane in California.
Now they're they're dragging it here to me, and they're going to make me pay for the chief of police that's getting $800,000 a year and a hundred and fifty thousand dollar pensions for teachers and all of this crazy stuff that they give away in Russia.
It doesn't matter if it's the president of the United States or an alderman here in a city of St. Louis, in the city of St. Louis, they spend $20,000 to paint flowers on fire hydrants.
And when the guy on TV asked him, you really think that's a good expenditure of money right now?
He said, I think it's an excellent way to spend money.
It doesn't matter if it's the little board of alderman guy or all the way up to the top.
They will not leave us alone.
There is no honesty or integrity in anything that any of them do anymore.
Yeah, all of this is true, but the fact of the matter is that that kind of thing cannot be sustainable.
That kind of thing is not, it's not, it it cannot survive.
It will implode on itself.
We've seen it happen.
We've seen it happen time and time again.
Well, and who's gonna pay for it?
Uh me and you my kids, your grandkids?
Well, yes, your brother's kids.
I think I think the the we're we're right in the middle of the implosion.
You your reaction, I think, is symptomatic of everybody not gonna take it anymore.
I I I think you uh I don't think most people to the point of giving up or checking out.
I think they're they're to the point of stopping this and reversing it and doing what they can to.
Uh they've got most people have no choice.
Most people can't leave.
We're not gonna go to New Zealand, we're not gonna go to Costa Rica, we're not gonna go to Singapore.
We certainly aren't gonna go to Iran.
Where are you gonna go?
I don't know.
There's no place, see, and you know what, Rush, I think about this all the time.
There's no place left for me.
Are you or you know, people at work and you know, try to act responsibly and do what they're supposed to and raise their own families and try to take care of their own children and their grand.
No, Rush, I get up in the morning, I go to work till about two o'clock, I come home and babysit My grandson because I love him while my daughter goes to work, and when my wife gets home at four or five, I go back out and go to work.
There's practically never been a time in my life that I didn't work at least two jobs.
You know, and if there's there's no place left for me.
There's no place left for me.
See, I I I look it.
Um I'm I'm not, I'm not, I don't want to dispel your passion because your passion is needed.
But this is the only place left.
That's the point.
This is the only place left.
There's nowhere else you can go.
You're not the only place we can re-establish the United States of America is the United States of America.
We're not going to be a re-establishing Ireland, not to put anybody else down, but we're not going to be able.
I mean, if you look around this.
Why, why did this happen?
You seem big.
How did this happen?
40 years of this, 40 years of that, 40 of this uh inattention, uh of inattention of things.
I'm attacked.
Everybody on our side is attacked.
If I i i if if I if I were distracted by it, I could spend every minute of this show defending myself against slurs, slander, libel that's out there.
But I don't want to succeed, let them succeed in distracting me from all of this.
We get attacked even from our own side.
It's all there in that piece.
Angelo Code Villa, the American spectator, the ruling class.
The kind of things I've been saying for years, it's nobody gets out of high school.
Everybody wants to be in the big clique.
The thing is, this click has serious ramifications.
You've laid it all out.
I can't do a better job than you have in laying it all out.
It's been going on and happening for years and years and years.
There's a there's a soft tyranny where the will of the people is rejected.
The statists advance their agenda regardless.
And they can be elected, they can put in the courts, the bureaucracy in the media, academia.
These are the institutions that that slowly but surely have been populated and bastardized.
And this the answer to this, Joe, and there is an answer to it.
The answer to it is to elect conservatives, not pretenders, not panderers, not just Republicans, but conservatives who understand what's going on and have the guts to do something about it, and all not all at once, but to get it started.
But but look at what's happening.
Our own side, people on our own side are out there trashing Sharon Angle.
Well, we can't win if we're gonna sit there and say we can't reform Social Security.
You can't mention social.
Look at if we can't beat the most despised liberal Democrat in the state of Eras in the state of Nevada.
If we can't beat the most unpopular liberal democrats they have ever been unpopular with this set of circumstances, then it's over.
But we haven't gotten to the point where we can't beat them yet.
This November is crucial.
There's always an answer to this stuff, and it works every time it's tried, Joe, and it's called conservatives.
And it's not to the point where we need to chuck it and move away or give up or any of that.
This has been built for 20 years for 20 plus years, 21 on August 1st.
That's coming up pretty soon, by the way, the anniversary.
Been ringing the bell about this.
And all the while people on our side have been co-opted by the by the ruling class.
We can't wait on someone else to ride to the rescue.
There is no cavalry.
We are the cavalry.
We're gonna have to do this ourselves.
I gotta take a break.
Joe, thanks for the call.
A little long here in this segment.
Next one's gonna be just somewhat shorter than usual because of it.
There is good news in all of this, folks.
The good news is that the people are with us on this.
The good news is that people are engaged, ready to deal with this in November.
I mean, I could be wrong about this, but I don't think so.
This judge.
This judge has put the icing on The cake.
This judge has confirmed for tens of millions of Americans these people need to go.
The Democrats are Republican apologists.
We are going to strike politically at the ruling class in November, and we're going to continue to strike them until they're broken up.
Otherwise it's over.
And people don't want it to be over.
I remember I was on that show William Shatner show, uh, forget title issue.
I really enjoyed it, but I really enjoyed meeting William Shatner.
But it weren't time we're talking about raw nerve.
Was that what it was?
We're talking, he didn't want to talk issues.
This, of course, with me, you can't avoid it.
We eventually got into issues.
We're talking about, I think uh the environment or health care and he finds me and said, How do you know?
I said, because I'm Rush Limbaugh.
I know.
Too few people are willing to acknowledge what they know.
And I know.
I know what I'm saying.
It's right.
It's my job to know.
People have been warnings this day was coming from.
My father told my brother and meet years ago.
This day was coming.
Ronald Reagan said it.
And nowhere else to go.
This is the last best hope on earth.
There's no no place else to go for freedom.
It's my business to know.
That's how I know.
A lot, too many people are afraid to admit what they know is right.
Because it's controversial.
It'll cause controversy or it'll cause confrontation.
We need to elect people to federal office who will take an Arizona law, make it federal law, apply it in every state, every town, and every city.
That's what we need to do.
And we're on the verge of it.
Now's not the time to check out.
This is a time to strap it up.
This is a time to strap it on.
Not tune out.
November's not that far away.
How about all of you people who told me rush let the Democrats win?
Let Clinton win.
Let them all win.
Let people find out how bad it is.
Okay, you got your wish.
They've won.
You find out how rotten they are.
Now what?
Now we take it back.
It's that simple.
We better not have damn well sat around and let them win just to let them win.
When it comes to identity theft, folks, one of the fastest growing concerns is the improper use of medical information.
This is the kind of identity theft that could kill.
People stealing your medical information.
Your medical data is gone.
You're in an accident.
Nobody knows what you have, what you have, what you are, your medical history.
Because nobody knows who you are.
And this kind of medical fraud, this kind of identity theft is serious because it could kill you.
No need for it.
Life lock exists to prevent this.
Life lock is the trusted leader in identity theft protection, the best identity alert system there is.
They're at 800-4404833.
800-440-4833.
Save 10%.
Mention my name.
Offer code Rush, LifeLock.
800-440-4833.
Alex, Apple Valley, California.
One minute, but I wanted to get to you, sir.
Hello.
Well, what happens after amnesty gets passed?
Do they close the borders then?
Or what?
Well, see, that's that's the thing.
And then also what's the thing.
You're asking what's unemployment going to be like in five or ten years.
When they're kids.
No, don't.
The Democrats look at this is the point.
The Democrats don't care about that.
All the chaos that you're envisioning with these questions you're asking is exactly what they want.
It just means the federal government needs to get bigger to provide benefits for all of these people who are out of work.
Because all amnesty is, is a voter registration drive for the Democrat Party.
And sadly, there are a lot of misguided Republicans who look at it the same way.
There's a voter registration opportunity.
Amnesty.
We need to elect people to federal office who will take that Arizona law, make it a federal law, apply it in every state and town and city in this country.
Don't have time to play the audio, but Jan Brewer, the governor Just said, it's important to remind everybody that today, absolutely, the federal government got relief from the courts to not do their job.
And that means that now they've got this temporary injunction.
They need to step up, the feds do, and do the job that they have the responsibility to do for the people of America and for the people of Arizona.
Obviously, it's a little bump in the road.
It's just an injunction, a temporary injunction.
Our legal team, and I'm sure the U.S. of America's legal team will be looking at some of the issues that they're concerned about.
She's not giving up the governor of Arizona, and we aren't either.
▲
Export Selection