All Episodes
Previous Next
May 14, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:42
May 14, 2010, Friday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And greetings to you, music lovers, thrill seekers, conversationalists all across the fruited plane, Rushlin Boy, and the Excellence in Broadcasting Network on Friday.
Live from the Southern Command in Sunny South Florida.
It's open line Friday!
Yep, yep, yep, yep, yep, yep, yeah.
All right.
Here's the phone number 800-282-2882 and the email address, L Rushmow at EIBNet.com.
We go to the phones on Friday.
As you know, the uh program content is all yours in one of the greatest career risks ever taken by a major modern media figure.
Turning over content of the most listened to media program in the country to rank amateurs.
And we love doing it.
Now I wish, ladies and gentlemen, I want to uh issue an apology.
I've I was very, very distracted in the first hour.
I just overwhelmed with incoming information with the Obama presser and so forth.
I had such great plans for uh the first hour of the program today, and pretty much got it all in there, but I wish to apologize for the uh the uh ping pong nature of the uh the first hour of the program, and I am committing to you today to sound a little bit more organized in uh in this hour.
So I'm I'm I'm still struck here by Obama's little press briefing separating himself from everything going on here with this oil spill.
I'm not gonna tolerate any further.
I won't he's I don't know how anybody can believe him when he says that the problem is that big oil is too close to federal regulators.
Federal regulators hate big oil.
I mean, it's and especially this bunch of federal regulators, the federal regulators in this regime, this I mean, they just despise big oil.
So everything that I thought he would say before he said it, he actually said, and it just here's a guy, as I say, is praising himself for 10% unemployment, demanding results from everybody else, saying, You're gonna pay for it.
BP, yep, they're gonna pay for it.
Well, who's gonna pay for the damage this regime is doing to every sector of this country?
Who is going to pay for the damage done to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?
Who is gonna pay for the damage done to the U.S. private sector?
Who is going to pay for everything this regime the BP can't hold a candle to the Obama regime when it comes to destruction?
These people every day blaze a trail of it.
From the moment they get up till the moment they go to bed.
Who's gonna pay for the damage that liberal policies have done to businesses, to homes, to home values, to jobs.
There was a story yesterday, everybody's all excited.
The uh foreclosures seem to be leveling off.
They're still happening.
Everybody was very happy yesterday.
Yeah, the economy, this uh it's there's how how can a slower process of destruction be good news.
It's just so we're we're leveling off here when it comes to uh foreclosures, but repossessions are on the rise.
Repossessions, home repossessions are on the rise.
Wait till we get another uh adjustment, the adjust adjustable rate mortgages.
We've got a volatile stock market, the European Union is is hanging by a thread.
Uh Euro has started to level off a little bit today, but it's still uh it's it's it's plunging.
I said in the first hour, one of the things I I've got distracted from saying, and I distracted myself here, but I started the day wondering if we might have a repeat of Black Wednesday in 1992.
That's the day that George Soros destroyed the pound.
And the program started today, we were under 200, uh over 200 down on the Dow, and the Euro was plunging after a one trillion dollar bailout earlier this week for Greece, Sarkozy threatening to pull out of uh of the European Union, uh, and it's all based on the fact that nothing's real.
All b nothing is real, none of this financial stuff has been real.
It's all been done with fake money.
There hasn't been that much wealth.
We we we really did used to create genuine wealth in this country.
But right now, our wealth is tied up in debt, primarily government debt, but there's consumer debt as well, not to mention the homeowner debt that people are just walking away from.
And no, Obama's out there taking applauding himself and demanding results from everybody else.
So the regime tells us that what we need more government to fix government, more taxes to fix government, more spending to fix government.
Isn't that always the answer?
You have a government program they come up with, it fails, need another government program to fix the previous failing government program.
We've got so many redundant welfare programs, we have so many redundant uh health care, Medicare, Medicaid, Medicaid Part B, Medicare Part D. We've got so many redundant giveaway programs,
we find waste and fraud, and they never work, and so we have another program to fix that program which requires new tax increases, bigger government, a new agency, a whole bunch of czars, and nothing ever gets fixed.
Obama is running a government that wastes hundreds of billions of dollars a year.
He's running a government that is destroying private property, my friends, destroying homeownership, destroying jobs, and he's concerned about who's gonna pay for the damage in the Gulf.
British petroleum has already spent 450 billion or million dollars trying to fix this.
And they're gonna be spending much, much more.
And I the audacity of this guy to point to British petroleum and Transocean when he single-handedly is destroying what was the engine of prosperity, never known anywhere else but the United States of America in this whole world.
Who's gonna pay for the failing public schools?
This this situation in Highland Park, Illinois.
We've learning a lot more about this assistant principal.
She is a pure far-left fringe radical.
She this is not the first political decision that this woman has made.
This Ebsen name or whatever name is.
This woman is as far off the deep end as any of Obama's czars.
I mean, to the point of having uh seminars in school with the kids uh where they have to uh understand about uh homosexuality, the parents are not allowed to stop this.
Uh it was just, you know, brainwashing propaganda, uh indoctrination, and not just homosexuality, just a bunch of other uh left-wing sacred cow seminal issues.
And she's using these kids to advance her own political agenda.
And I remind you, back during the Olympic boycott of the 80s, the same people said we shouldn't punish these athletes.
Well, these athletes are the essence, purity, uh, and innocence.
Jimmy Carter should not be punishing these athletes, the kids for what the Soviet Union did in Afghanistan, but now we can use the kids, the liberals who claim they're for the kids.
For the children, now they can be used as pawns.
Public schools are failing.
Who's gonna pay?
Who is going to pay for the damage being done by illegal immigration?
Do you really we have videotape or audio tape of the mayor of Los Angeles, Antonio Villaraigosa, saying that illegal immigration has added positively to the Los Angeles and Southern California economy.
We have an attorney general who condemns an immigration law in Arizona, he has not read.
And it's 10 pages long.
He hasn't read it.
He hasn't been briefed.
He cannot been, he cannot be made to say, yeah, Islamic terrorism is responsible for this potential Times Square truck bomb.
Can't say it.
Just can't say it.
My point here is, folks, you know, leave BPO, well, look at BP if you want, and you can look at this bill and blame them all you want.
But liberalism and socialism have done more damage to more people than any oil company, than any insurance company, than any coal company, or any one or thing in the private sector could ever do.
The lives ruined, the homes lost, the jobs destroyed, the happiness destroyed, the contentment destroyed, the dreams of a nice future, literally destroyed by this regime and their ideology, socialism, liberalism, statism, whatever it is you want to call it.
Nobody regulates the regulators.
Nobody regulates the politicians.
Where are the congressional hearings on what Obama is doing, has done, or will do about this bill?
Where are those hearings?
Too bad Obama's not mad at uh 10% unemployment.
I'd like to see him get mad at illegal immigration.
I'd like to see him get mad that our southern border is one of the most dangerous places in the world.
Instead, he's mad at the state of Arizona for trying to protect itself.
He's mad at people for using the term Islamic terrorism.
He's so hoping that it's a Tea Party that wants to blow up.
He's so you they found three more people involved in this Times Square thing, and they're not from Texas, folks.
They're from Pakistan.
And the government so doesn't want that to be.
The regime would much prefer that this guy's partners be from Texas.
I'm not making it up.
That's their fervent hope.
So we've got destruction all around us, including the oil spill.
But that's chump change compared to what this regime is doing to the people of this country.
And we haven't even gotten to the tax increases are going to hit next year.
You talk about taking dreams away, making prosperity for your children and grandchildren even tougher to attain if this stuff isn't reversed and rolled.
And then we have Obama in a fit of peak yesterday saying the Republicans drove the car in a ditch and they're not getting the keys back.
They're not getting the keys back.
And I don't think he originated that.
I think some idiot congressman did.
But I'm not sure who.
I know I know I've heard it before.
He may be repeating himself.
He's not angry about what the United Auto workers did to the auto industry.
He didn't care who paid for that.
He just nationalized them.
Too bad he's not angry at the National Education Association for destroying education in this country.
Too bad he's not angry at the government of Mexico and its role in promoting illegal immigration.
No, who's he mad at?
Me.
Mad at me.
And anybody else who criticizes him.
He's not mad at Iran.
He hates the Tea Party.
Calls them teabaggers.
He doesn't like Sarah Palin.
Look at his enemies list.
And most of it, most of his enemies, are to be found within the United States border.
Back after this.
And speaking of destruction, uh, ladies and gentlemen from the Wall Street Journal today.
Wrecking crews are preparing to tear down a landmark 5,000 square foot house in the posh neighborhood of Palmer Woods.
In the coming weeks, a sign that Detroit is finally getting serious about raising thousands of vacant and abandoned structures across the city.
The short version of the story is that Detroit is going to demolish 10,000 abandoned properties.
I think they're going to beat Flint, Michigan to this.
Somebody in Flint suggested bulldozing part of Flint, Michigan.
All happening under Democrat control.
To the phones, Mel in Chattanooga, Tennessee.
Thank you for calling, sir.
Great to have you on open line Friday.
Yes, Mr. Limbach.
Can you hear me?
Yeah, I do.
Great.
It's an honor to talk to you.
Thank you for everything you're doing for us.
I have two questions to ask you, and I please need your input on it, please.
If the dollar collapses, how do I protect my savings?
Well, now you're you're you're you're putting me in a in a uh a risky situation because my job is not financial advisory.
Okay.
But if the dollar collapses, there's one thing you can short the dollar.
You could you could uh find out how to short the dollar and make a profit on the dollar collapsing.
Or you could go buy gold.
I know it what's happening today in Europe, it's not widespread, but the euro, it started to come back, but it was plummeting from the open today, and there were people lined up at some banks closing their accounts in Euros and buying gold, which is uh another thing that you might look into doing.
Or you might want to invest in Canadian dollars or Singapore dollars.
There's any number of you know, we've it is a serious thing.
Uh China cannot sell its debt.
We are not going to be able to sell all of our treasury note debt in the next auction.
We're gonna have to sell two trillion dollars of debt.
Okay, we may not have buyers for it.
It's uh it's uh the the the U.S. Congress, the Democrats have said they are not going to present a budget resolution before the election.
Normally, the new you know, the fiscal year starts October 1st.
They are required to have a budget.
That's where reconciliation comes into play.
You can get a budget bill passed in the Senate without 60 votes.
They're not going to even take it up.
They're not even going to have hearings or debates on the budget.
The reason is it's Obama's and theirs, and they don't want people to know what's in it.
They don't want people to know just how much more debt we're going to be racking up.
They are not going to do their constitutional responsibility because they are afraid of the damage they'll suffer at the elections if they do.
Yeah.
What did you planned on doing if the dollar collapses?
I was thinking about gold.
Well, gold gold has had quite a run because a lot of people uh are running to it right now, and I think gold is an all-time high price.
Well, let me get to the next question, which I think is more relative to what's going on today.
Uh in November, we're basically hoping that things change in Congress that we can take our country back.
Right.
Uh here's my thing.
The Democrats that voted for the health care uh thing like that, they didn't seem to be too worried about getting their job losing their job.
And to me, I my question is with all the backroom deals that Obama's doing and buying votes.
Can this regime fix the elections?
And he'll say to the Democrats, don't worry about what it is, you got your job.
I don't think they can fix elections to the point that they're gonna matter.
Uh I disagree with you.
Uh the Democrats are David Obi not running for re-election, doesn't have a chance.
He's the chairman of the appropriations committee.
There are a lot of Democrats that are not running.
John Boehner said the other day that a hundred and thirty seats are now in play, not one hundred.
And here from the uh the uh Capitol Hill newspaper called The Hill, Democrats feel health care fatigue.
Health care reform lift fatigue has set in among Democrats, casting doubt that Congress will move much health-related legislation the rest of the session.
So just as we all knew, folks.
Now that they've crammed it down their throat, there's not going to be one more mention of health care from now until November.
We all knew this was going to happen.
All these so-called fixes that uh people said they were gonna have to make to the bill may not make them because the Democrats are not going to hold a majority.
They're not going to hold enough of a majority in order to be able to blanketly change things.
So uh Democrats in the House and Senate alike now, it says here, are eager to focus on vote-getting issues, such as job creation as the midterm elections approach.
Earl Pomeroy, Democrat New Jersey, who voted for the health overcall uh overhaul, doesn't want to talk about it at all.
He's Already running ads for his re-election.
He said the health care bill's done.
Action on health care is now in the executive branch.
They're the ones that implement it.
Critically important that they implement it in a sound way, and I believe the attention of Congress is best spent on overseeing the sound implementation of the bill.
They don't want to talk about it.
They don't want to have anything to do with it.
They know it's a vote killer.
So now they want to focus on vote-getting issues like job creation.
What do they know about that?
They can't even hold to their own jobs now.
Obama, he's setting himself up to have nothing to do with the Congressional Democrats.
He's setting himself up as an outsider.
Surveying all this damage and saying somebody's got to go in there and fix it.
They're scared to death over what health care has done to them and the rest of their agenda as well.
Okay, let's go back to the Eric Holder show.
He is our attorney general.
He has not read the Arizona Immigration Law that he has trashed, that he has criticized.
As my uh my friend Andy McCarthy says, is he not guilty of profiling, in essence?
Arizonans and the governor.
And the law itself.
He hasn't read it.
This from yesterday, QA with Congressman Ted Poe, a Republican from Texas.
I have not had a chance to, I've glanced at it.
I have not read it.
It's ten pages.
It's a lot shorter than the health care bill, which was 2,000 pages long.
I'll give you my copy of it if you uh would like to have a copy.
Even though you haven't read the law, do you have an opinion as to whether it's constitutional?
I have not really I've not been briefed yet.
We, as I said, have had underway a review of the law.
I have not been briefed by the people who have been responsible who are responsible for that review.
Are you gonna read the law?
I'm sure I will read the law in anticipation of that briefing.
I know that they will put that in front of me, and I'll spend a good evening reading that law.
Ten pages.
I thought the Supreme Court determined whether a law was constitutional.
Am I wrong about that?
Why does Eric Holder's uh uh team uh reporting back to him determine whether or not the law is constitutional?
I'm just asking.
Now, let's go back to last Sunday.
And uh know what's in it.
He was on Meet the Press, David Gregory said Arizona, what's specifically wrong with the anti-immigration bill law that's been passed there?
The concern I have about the law that they have passed is that I think it has the possibility of leading to uh racial profiling and putting a wedge between law enforcement and the community that would in fact be profiled.
People in that community are less likely then to cooperate with people in law enforcement, less likely to share information, less likely to be witnesses in case that law enforcement is trying to solve.
Uh, he said all that without having read the bill.
He was asked yesterday, Thursday if he'd read it, he said, no, I haven't read it yet.
My team's working on it, I get a report back.
Well, you're gonna read it before they oh, sure, I'll bet that I'll get briefed and I'll read it before I'll spend some night uh time at night with it, ten pages sure.
But he's denouncing a law last Sunday when he hasn't uh read it on ABC's this week.
Fill-in host Jake Tapper said, You've said that we're a nation of cowards because we don't talk freely and openly about race.
So, in that spirit, let me give it a shot.
Do you think the Arizona immigration law is racist?
Well, I don't think it's necessarily a good idea.
That is certainly one of the concerns that I have that you will end up in a situation where people are racially profiled.
He hasn't read the bill.
And if you read the bill, you find out that it's not profiling that takes place here.
Specifically so.
So all this means is that once again, you had a law passed.
It's an opportunity for a bunch of socialists to trash it, to advance their agenda, or to create chaos and tumult for the express purpose of advancing their agenda.
This this guy is not a serious man.
He's an ideologue running the Department of Justice.
Justice is supposed to be blind.
Well, I know it sounds good.
Justice is supposed to not care about any economic or political aspect of your case, should you run afoul of the law.
But we have a pure socialist radical ideologue in charge of the Department of Justice.
Yesterday afternoon in Washington, Capitol Hill, House Judiciary Committee, uh Eric Holder, Representative Lamar Smith, Texas.
Do you feel that these individuals might have been incited to take the actions they did because of radical Islam, meaning the Times Square bomber and a number of other would-be terrorists?
You think you think they took the actions they did because of radical Islam?
There are a variety of reasons why I think people have taken these actions.
One, I think you have to look at each individual case.
I mean, we're in the process now of talking to Mr. Shazad to try to understand what it is that drove him to take the action he did.
But radical Islam could have been one of the reasons.
There are a variety of reasons why people.
But was radical Islam one of them?
There are a variety of reasons why people do these things.
Some of them are potentially religious.
But all I'm asking is if you think among those variety of reasons, radical Islam might have been one of the reasons that the individuals took the steps that they did.
We see you say radical Islam.
I mean, I think those people who espouse a version of Islam that is not.
Are you uncomfortable attributing any of their actions to radical Islam?
It sounds like I don't want to say anything negative about a religion.
And there you have it.
So you'll end up in a situation.
You might end up in a situation.
You will end up in a situation where there's racial profiling, and now we can't say uh potentially religious.
I mean, this this is uh it's it's it's it's it's infuriating and it's hilarious at the same time.
Radical Islam, I I I I it says we can't um potentially religious reasons, yes, but they might be potentially religious reasons.
Potentially, potentially religious.
Why can't they say it?
Why can't he say it, do you think?
What is his problem?
What is his reluctance to say, yeah, there's some radical Islamists out there.
They say it about themselves.
Why can't he?
What's he afraid of?
Who is ordering him?
Now to be fair, to be fair to Attorney General Holder, ladies and gentlemen.
It's probably hard to consider somebody an enemy when they share so many of your values.
Well, the radical Islamists do not like Western democracy.
Neither does Holder.
Radical Islamists are not crazy about Western civilization in general.
Neither is Holder.
Neither is Obama.
Oh, yeah, I mean to say, well, this I've been saying this for a year since over a year since Obama took office.
Isn't it clear to everybody Obama doesn't like certain aspects of this country and culture?
Isn't it patently obvious that he doesn't?
He wants to return the nation's wealth to its rightful owners.
So maybe the problem we got to be fair here to Attorney General Holder.
Maybe it's tough to look at these guys as a huge enemy when you share some similar political views.
I mean, that's as good a guess as any other as to why he's so reluctant to answer the question, radical Islam as a motivation.
And maybe we can find a clue here.
Remember this, Mayor Bloomberg back on May the 4th.
I want to make clear that we will not tolerate any bias or backlash against Pakistani or Muslim New Yorkers.
All of us live in the city, and uh among any group, there's always a few bad apples, but uh the people that live in the city are proud of the fact that this is the city that gives everybody from every place in the world an opportunity, no matter what religion they practice, no matter where they are their parents came from.
This is the mayor of New York after he learned that it was not an angry middle-aged white person upset with Obama's health care.
In fact, this is May 3rd, CBS evening news, Mayor Bloomberg.
If I had to guess 25 cents, this would be exactly that.
Somebody who's homegrown, maybe a mentally deranged person Or somebody with a political agenda that doesn't like the health care bill or something.
It could be anything.
Okay, so yeah, anything.
A white guy doesn't like the health care bill, mentally deranged, political agenda.
Then we find out it was radical Islamist from Pakistan.
Well, we're not going to tolerate any backlash.
We're not going to tolerate any backlash against Pakistan as a Muslim to New York.
They're not going to tolerate it.
And you've got Holder's, well, I would not potentially religious in nature.
Yeah, but I'm not gonna would not say radical Islam is uh What are we to make of this, folks?
What are they afraid of?
Are they afraid of a backlash against radical Islamists if they say radical Islam?
It sounds to me like that's what they're afraid of.
Bloomberg is so afraid of a backlash against radical Islamists.
We're not gonna tolerate it.
We're not gonna tolerate another oil leak.
We're not gonna tolerate nukes in around.
We're gonna tolerate, we're not gonna tolerate any backlash against Pakistani or uh Middle Eastern people here in New York City.
Well, maybe we're not gonna tolerate a backlash against radical Islamists.
Because we are worried about our relationship with the Muslim world.
I don't know.
I mean, somebody's gonna have to uh help me.
Is there ever any concern about a backlash uh against radical Christians?
Is anybody worried about a radical backlash against health care opponents?
Oh, no, it's the health care opponents who are out there, they hope, doing all the bombing.
But they're not.
Bottom line here, uh, ladies and gentlemen, is that uh attorney general Holder is not up to this job.
Clearly, not up to the job, is out of place.
He needs to be a czar.
If he's gonna be in the administration someplace, he needs to be a czar, where he doesn't have to testify about what he's doing, where he doesn't have to be accountable to anybody.
Loretta Sanchez, by the way, this morning on the MS, NBC, the uh anchor, Peter Alexander said a group, uh a group like that from so far away could funnel money to the U.S. to a citizen here.
They're talking about the funding for the Times Square bomber.
Um, and and and uh Carbom winds up in Times Square.
I mean, how how do we combat the circuitous flow of money from all over the world to a guy here in Connecticut who pays for the creation of a bomb and buying an SUV off Craigslist?
It takes it to Times Square parks it, and were it not for his screwed up alarm clock would have blown up Times Square.
How do we combat that?
It becomes even more important for us to have a groups within the government to take a look at what's going on on some of these websites to understand the psyche of these people and ultimately what they're going to try to do is recruit from within.
So we need to be sure that we don't give them a reason that we're able to spot this.
Yeah.
Don't give them a reason to hate us.
Don't give them a reason to able to spot us, because that'll just make them mad.
Now, when these people are out of power, they're funny as hell saying stuff like this, but not running the country.
And it ain't funny.
And greetings and welcome back.
I can give you the answer, folks, since we're not gonna get any phone calls on this.
And I uh give the why is Holder reluctant.
It's as clear as the hand in front of my face.
Why Holder is reluctant to say, yeah, uh radical Islamists uh behind this, sure.
His law firm, don't forget this.
His law firm, ladies and gentlemen, represented a bunch of terrorists at Guantanamo.
As have some of his appointees at justice.
His law firm represents these people, so he can't say, yeah, radical Islam, because then he's condemning his own clients.
Or his firms, his former firm's own clients.
That's why he can't say it.
Stop and think of that.
Radical Islam, there's no question it's our enemy.
They say so.
We don't listen to them, but they say so.
Eric Holder, the attorney general, his former law firm represented a bunch of them at Guantanamo.
Some people in that law firm actually gave pictures, showed uh pictures of uh uh things that to the clients, the terrorists that they were not allowed to see or shouldn't have seen.
Uh and he's appointed a bunch of lawyers as his assistants in the Department of Justice, who have also represented, he won't tell us the names.
Radical Islamist terror suspects.
So of course he can't say, yeah, radical Islam, because he's condemning his own firm to condemning his own firm's clients.
Our attorney general.
That's his problem.
Orchid of the phones in Maylene, Alabama.
This is uh Ron.
Welcome to Sir.
Nice to have you on the program.
Thank you, Rush.
Uh, and I want to say thank you so much for you representing us and giving us a voice.
I've been listening to you since I was a policeman back in the New Orleans area in the late 70s and early eighties.
Well, what I'm calling about today is my nephew was on that rig that blew up.
He was Oh, wow.
He was on the last hour and 15 to 20 minutes that he would have had left and he was going home, but he didn't make it.
But what upsets me is that when I hear someone say, God is a Democrat and is happy because this rig blew up and further their political agenda, that just drives me and the family up the wall.
This young man was twenty-seven years old.
He served in the Air Force, came back home, married his sweetheart, her name was Courtney, and they have a three-year-old daughter and a three-month-old daughter.
And this guy was an honest, hard working, dedicated person.
He did everything he could for his family.
And he is one of those little people that the Democrats always talk about they want to help.
Well, they're trying to shut down the jobs that he did.
He didn't have anything but a high school education, but he found a job he could do to provide for his family.
And he and these other guys that died in these coal mines and in these uh this oil explosion are the little guys the Democrats are always talking about, they want to help.
Well, they're trying to shut down their jobs as quick as they can shut them down, and use them as a political tool to get their agenda passed, which is get cap and trade passed and get their jobs turned down.
Now, is that what they're supposed to be?
That's what they're supposed to be doing.
Helping out, killing jobs for quote the little guys that they want to help.
I hate this.
This just drives us crazy.
His wife Courtney and his mother Peggy are just devastated by this.
And they want to use it for political advantage.
I just, that's beyond the pale.
The real world consequences of real live liberalism.
Now, to be fair, the my m as far as my memory is concerned, I I think only a uh female radio talk show host used the term.
I don't think I haven't heard an elected Democrat say uh uh God is a Democrat.
But it it is a pre prevalent view from the from the radical left.
You're quite correct about that.
Uh just as they're hoping that this terrorism, domestic terrorism is is committed by people essentially like your nephew, who are Tea Party members.
Uh they're desperately hoping that they're people like your nephew, and it's uh it's understandably infuriating, people like your nephew, people like me.
I mean, they have no problem drawing a straight line between Oklahoma City and me, for example.
But they can't even see radical Islam as a cause of a potential bomb blast in Times Square.
Then this oil rig blows up, and not just your nephew, but the other ten that were killed are not even a story, because the opportunity for the advancement of a political agenda is just too great.
That's exactly right.
That's just it's driving us crazy because they have no face, they have no name, and I'm trying to give one to him because he deserves it.
Well, you've done a great job.
Ron, thanks very much for calling and God bless.
We'll be back right after this.
Don't go away.
I'll tell you something else than all this does.
It diminishes the deaths of these guys, these people on the oil rig, to pretend that the people that work on these rigs don't care about safety.
To pretend that the people involved in these rigs, the people that work on these rigs, the companies that employ them and know them don't care about safety.
Only the federal government, only the regime cares about safety.
Only the federal regime's agency with more regulation cares.
Only a bureaucrat can care about safety.
The big bad oil companies.
They don't care about their employers.
▲
Export Selection