It looks like we can't visit Boston now because we apprehended a couple of illegals up there and we didn't ask for their papers.
And the feds are doing it.
Got to boycott Boston now.
Whole state of Massachusetts.
Greetings, my friends, and welcome back.
What am I talking about?
Hang in there, be tough, I'll tell you.
You know, it is obvious to me.
Well, it's not obvious.
Something's going on.
This Shahzad guy, Rafael, what is his name?
Why am Faisal Shahzad?
See, this guy sounds so much like Kaiser Sojet.
And Hamid Karzai.
I'm just, I get confused in this guy's name.
Apparently, he's singing like a bird because there are now raids in three cities with people associated with him.
The Times Square bomber.
Remember, originally it was a white male in his 40s, a tea party guy listening to Rush Limbaugh show who hated health care, a lone wolf who wanted to blow up Times Square.
Now we find out it's Faisal Shahzad, not on the no-fly list all these times, Pakistan, Taliban, perhaps Al-Qaeda.
And now we're rounding up buddies of his in Long Island.
We're rounding up a couple buddies in Boston.
Here's the story.
Top Massachusetts law enforcement official says that two men who have been taken into custody connection with a failed Times Square car bomb are considered to have had a direct connection to the suspect.
So it's a cabal of people that hate Obama's health care plan.
The official says that the, well, that's what Mayor Bloomberg said.
The official says the men are believed to have provided money to Shahzad, but investigators are not sure whether they were whipping accomplices or simply moving funds as is common between Middle Eastern and Central Asian.
Ah, profiling.
This is AP is profiling.
What do you mean it's common amid Middle Eastern and Central Asian nationals to move money this way?
Is that not profiling?
What do you mean it's common?
You speculate that Middle Eastern and Central Asian nationals launder money this way without even knowing where it's going and for what purpose?
What a bunch of bigots at AP.
They say Arizona's bad.
The official says these people might be completely innocent.
Well, that's even worse.
They might be completely innocent, yet we've nabbed them on immigration charges.
That's the interesting thing, folks.
The two men in Boston have been arrested on administrative charges, which means federal authorities will not advise them of Miranda rights to question them, as is required in criminal cases.
One of the men arrested Thursday has been charged with overstaying his visa.
Another, identified as Pier Khan, has been charged with staying in the country despite an order of removal.
The third man was also arrested for alleged immigration violations.
So they're being held on immigration charges?
Where's the outrage?
As I said last hour, Sheriff Arpaio running amok up in Boston.
What does the assistant superintendent have Highland Park High School think of this?
Now, would they have been able to ask about these guys' IDs, their papers, if Obama and Holder get their way in Arizona?
Isn't it interesting that we can selectively go out and nab people on the basis of what?
We don't even know what.
We just assume Shahzad's singing.
We assume Shahzad is telling everybody what's going on here.
Anyway, greetings, folks.
Great to have you here.
Rush Limbaugh, Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
telephone number if you want to be on the program, 800-282-2882 and the email address LRushbo at EIBNet.com.
Do you think, let me ask you a question, if we find, this would be a good test for liberals.
If we find illegals, I don't care whether they're Shahzaj buddies who hate healthcare, Obamacare, or if they are people who just want a better life from Central America, Mexico.
If they come into this country with illegal cigarettes, will the left then perhaps oppose them?
And the answer is no.
The answer is no.
Because they're minorities.
And as minorities, they're allowed to do anything because they have been so oppressed.
Of course they have to smoke cigarettes.
That's the only way they can get through the day.
You think the libs would not like them bringing illegal cigarettes?
Bloomberg would not have a fit.
Bloomberg would not have a fit at all if they're bringing illegal cigarettes.
He would understand it.
They're so oppressed.
That's how they deal with the stress in their lives.
I mean, he'd try to snatch it away from, but he wouldn't throw them out.
He wouldn't throw them under the bus.
I mean, he'd snatch the cigarettes away from them.
Now, maybe Highland Park High School is worried about something like this.
This is a story from Odessa, Texas.
He went around telling people he was a 16-year-old basketball player who was an illegal immigrant from Haiti.
But it turns out that Gerdwich Montimere was really 22, was a naturalized U.S. citizen from Haiti.
Before authorities caught on to his scheme, he had convinced people at Permian Hasscrew and Odessa of his false story.
He was arrested on a charge of failure to identify himself to the cops.
He's been freed after posting $500 bond.
Permian High School, by the way, is the school that inspired the book and the movie and the TV series Friday Night Lights.
So why would a 22-year-old naturalized citizen from Haiti run around and tell people that he's a 16-year-old illegal immigrant from Haiti?
Would somebody explain that to me?
Girls?
Oh, yeah, you may be right, Sterdley, because the basketball player is the key here.
Athletes get the girls.
At a high school made famous by television, books, and movies, 22-year-old illegal alien, a legal alien, naturalized U.S. citizen, runs around pretending to be a 16-year-old basketball player, illegal.
What it tells me is this guy thinks he's safer from the law as an illegal than he is as a naturalized citizen from Haiti.
And he may have a point.
I mean, he may be right.
Now, Sterdley, Bloomberg would understand that these guys, they only have illegal cigarettes because they want a better life.
I mean, if they're willing to come into the country illegally because they want a better life, cigarettes, they want a better life as well.
All right, camp and trade.
Let's move on to this.
We're still going to take phone calls on this Highland Park thing if you want.
When we get back to them, almost 1,000 pages here, John Kerry, the haughty John Kerry, who once served in Vietnam, and Joel Lieberman have announced their big bill.
And a number of sources, Investors Business Daily nails it in an editorial.
bill introduced Wednesday and sponsored by the two senators is called the American Power Act, an Orwellian phrase, if ever there was one.
Like Obama's offshore drilling program, for every incentive, there is a restriction.
It's as if Hamlet were to be appointed Secretary of Energy.
For those of you in Riolinda, I don't have time to explain that analogy.
To that end, the bill creates some 60 new agencies and projects to eat up our tax dollars and buy support.
And the bureaucracy that is created is in a little chart or a box here in their story.
According to a leaked draft summary, $7 billion annually to improve our transportation infrastructure and efficiency to be paid for by a gas tax that's not called a tax, but rather a linked fee, which is a new phrase, a linked fee.
There is $2 billion per year for researching and developing effective carbon capture and sequestration methods and devices.
There is even a new multi-billion dollar revenue stream for agriculture through a domestic offset program.
Ironically, the draft summary acknowledges the bill will cause energy prices to necessarily skyrocket.
I mean, the authors of the bill admit prices are going to skyrocket by promising to provide assistance to those Americans who may be disproportionately affected by potential increases in energy prices.
So you and I are going to subsidize the despised and disadvantaged.
When it is very simple, why not just lower prices and create jobs by increasing domestic supply?
It's not about energy.
It's not about green this.
It's the same thing as healthcare.
It's not about healthcare.
It's about expanding government.
It's about raising taxes.
And it is about controlling freedom in people and limiting it.
Here, this is from page 600 of the energy tax bill.
Second phase, international assistance.
Not later than November 2011 or the date that is one year after the date of enactment of this act, whichever is later, the administrator shall complete a report that identifies opportunities, including action under existing authority, to achieve significant reductions in emissions of black carbon and other light-absorbing aerosols in foreign countries through the provision of technical and other assistance,
including identifying countries and regions that may be able to implement or expand programs for deploying cleaner and more efficient cook stoves and cook stove fuels, particularly in Africa and the developing regions of Asia.
With this legislation, we are going to replace the cooking stoves around the world, particularly in Africa.
The word international in the Cary Bill appears 213 times in a 987-page bill.
United Nations appears 17 times.
The word secretary, meaning the U.S. Secretary of Energy, appears 488 times.
Usually the context is the secretary shall decide or the secretary shall require.
Now here is the provision.
It's on page 775 and 776.
The provisions for low-income families.
In the case of an eligible taxpayer who is entitled to receive monthly cash payments Under Section 2201 of the Social Security Act, for months during the taxable year, the Secretary shall prescribe rules by which the credit allowed by subsection A with respect to such taxpayer may be distributed through the same mechanism as the monthly cash payments under the energy refund program under Section 2201 in lieu of such credit being allowed on the return of tax for the taxable year.
So it defines who the underprivileged are and how many times they are going to be subsidized or provided for by other taxpayers because of the skyrocketing prices that the authors of the bill admit will happen.
Now, remember, folks, all of this is based theoretically now.
The way they've sold this, from Obama to Kerry, I'm sad to say even Senator Lieberman.
But it's like I've told you, at the end of the day, he's a liberal, and liberals are liberals.
It's all been about green energy, wind and solar, getting rid of the filth, this oil, getting rid of the filth, this coal.
We're going to have this clean energy.
It's just like Spain.
Obama has even cited Spain as our model.
So yesterday, Obama calls the leader of Spain to lecture him on how to lower his debt to cut spending to avoid becoming like Greece.
But do you remember Obama while running for president talking many, many times about how the U.S. should be like Spain in that they had created this Eden of green economy?
And he promised us those same idyllic jobs.
Well, Spain's unemployment rate is approaching 20%.
Spain is failing, and the statists in Spain have admitted that in no small part the reason is they got suckered into creating a green economy.
Like Greece being told to cut out the government in healthcare, Spain is saying they have to cut out the green crap to keep from being Greece.
We're headed right down the same path that Greece has taken, and now we're going to go down the same path that Spain took, and we're going to lose jobs.
We're going to raise the price of energy.
We're not going to expand any of our supply.
We are just going to destroy.
This administration, this regime, and all its members are just creating a path of destruction wherever they go.
I got to take a timeout here, folks.
Oh, before this, two soundbites, two soundbites.
We want to go back in time because I've always said if you listen to the liberals, they will tell us, sometimes straight up, what we're going to do.
Soundbite number three, January 2008, editorial board meeting, San Francisco Chronicle.
Obama said.
When I was asked earlier about the issue of coal, you know, under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket.
Under my plan, rates would necessarily skyrocket.
They want $5 to $7 a gallon gasoline.
They want utility bills so high that you don't use your utilities.
They want because they want to conserve, ostensibly.
No, no, no.
They want to control.
And they premise all this on the fact that we, Americans, are destroying the planet.
Same meeting, editorial board, San Francisco Chronicle, Obama.
We would put a cap and trade system in place that is as aggressive, if not more aggressive, than anybody else's out there.
So if somebody wants to build a coal power plant, they can.
It's just that it will bankrupt them because they're going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that's being emitted.
Their carbon footprint.
So they've told us.
This is 2008.
This is during the campaign.
And now, putting it in motion, 987 pages of it, the regime presents the bill as authored by the haughty John Kerry and Joel Lieberman.
Here's that story on the St. Louis school heading down there to the oil spill.
It's Jessica Bach is the authorette.
Amid one of the nation's worst spills, eighth graders at Maplewood Richmond Heights Middle School are off the coast of Alabama this week studying ecology near the Gulf of Mexico.
Although the students had not seen any oil as of yesterday, and that's because it hasn't come ashore yet.
Dauphin Island is bustling with media, scientists, and environmental workers who are building barriers to protect the area and preparing for the worst, said Dave Grossman, technology coordinator at the middle school.
Yeah, we saw the impact right away.
Dauphin Island, usually quiet.
It's been one caravan after the other of trucks.
The island swelled quite a bit.
Wonder what the environmental impact of all the media down there is.
Maybe these kids can study the environmental impact of the media while they scan the horizon for the oil.
Back to the phones, Richard, Grand Forks, North Dakota.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Good afternoon, sir.
Thanks for taking the call.
You bet.
I'm a retired Border Patrol agent, 30 years.
And if those children want to see an ecological disaster, you ought to take them down to the southern border and show them all the trash, the detritus, and other stuff left.
Water jugs, clothes, food canisters, where these people have come across by the thousands, trampled down the brush on the ranchlands, created trails hundreds of yards wide, and just made a terrible, terrible mess for ranchers to clean up down there.
Well, they just want a better life, though.
Better life, sure, but they're coming over here.
They should try to keep this nice like we have it here.
Yeah, I know.
It's, there's no, it's very simple what this is all about.
It's all about votes.
It's pure and simple.
And the opportunity here for the left to once again paint everybody opposed to Obama, the Democrats, is racist.
It's like this business of the sexual orientation of Elena Kagan.
I mean, Howard Kurtz in the Washington Post today has a long story, huge story, decrying all the focus on her sexual orientation while he focuses on her sexual orientation.
And I'm convinced I know what this is about.
I mean, it is a big deal to these people.
Like I said yesterday, what is wrong with it if she is?
So what?
If she's a homosexual, big deal.
What's wrong with that from the left's perspective?
Nothing.
In fact, it's a resume enhancement.
So what's going on here, I'm convinced, is that they are, by focusing on this and blaming the Wall Street Journal for running pictures of her playing softball.
One of the things they're doing here is they're trying to bait Republican senators, not just on the Judiciary Committee, but throughout, Republican anybody's, to get involved in this and to say something about Kagan and her alleged homosexuality so that then they can say, see, see, see, it's a bunch of bigots.
Republicans are a bunch of homophobes.
And that would make a sympathy play for her.
That's what they're trying to do here.
There's no question.
It's the same thing is going on with the illegal immigration.
They're just trying to set up circumstances where they can follow and project their clichés and their own bigotry that all of us who oppose Obama and any of his policies or people are nothing but a bunch of racists, sexists, and homophobes.
That's exactly what they're doing.
And we're not falling for it anymore.
From this St. Louis Post-Dispatchatory on the eighth graders in search of the oil spill down in Alabama.
And this is from their environmental, what is this guy that the school, Dave Grossman, the technology coordinator at the middle school.
Dave Grossman at technology.
Did you have a technology coordinator, junior high school?
What's an A-B guy?
Oh, A-V, A-V.
Well, we didn't have an A-V.
We had industrial arts.
I guess I'm, yeah, scratch-alls and jack planes and, you know.
Oh, the film strip guy.
Oh, yeah, and the mimeograph mission.
Oh, yeah, okay, that guy.
Okay, so that's what this is.
That's who he got.
That's what the technological coordinator.
Okay.
It's sort of like calling a window washer a vision control coordinator.
I get it.
In this story, as the students learn more about the oil spill, some are frustrated and angry that it happened because of their concerns for the environment, Grossman said.
Quote, we might have a new generation of environmentalists in our group right now.
Well, naturally, what is the objective?
Why take them on a field trip to the oil spill in the first place?
You're not trying to create a bunch of environmentalist wackos.
Randy in Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Hello, and welcome to the EIB Network.
Rosh, thank you so much for taking my call.
You bet.
Mr. Buckley is proud.
And so are we of the job you did.
I just want to tell you that.
I've listened to you for so long.
And before I go, I want to let you know how much we appreciate you.
Thank you very much, sir.
I appreciate that.
I'll get right to my point.
I just got a couple sub points here.
And I will try to do this, although I am just livid.
My main point is this.
Why does the media, even the conservative media, our Republican, conservative representatives and so forth, why do we keep dancing on the head of a pin about what's going on with the laws?
It says this.
No, it don't.
It says that.
This isn't about the laws.
All of a sudden, Sharpton gets his rent a mob, runs down to Arizona, and all of a sudden, in his ever-so-soothing words, lets the Hispanics know, black or brown, we're all brown today.
When is the last time you've heard Barack Obama lift a finger to even acknowledge white America?
He is destroying this country, and we all know it.
But why?
Because he wants this to be a race against white America.
He wants 2010 to be that way because he wants Hispanics and blacks to feel underprivileged and vote against Republicans.
When we have anybody in Congress who knows the other side is lying through their eye teeth, will they say it?
No, they got to turn the other cheek and dance around.
So let's hope we can weed those out.
Republicans won't stand up in Congress, and the one thing that the president is supposed to do in this country by his oath is to defend our country, our citizenry, against enemies foreign and abroad.
He will never do a thing about the border situation because he will be seen as a black president sending down white troops to protect Haidi against fellow blacks and Hispanics.
When do we finally fight back, quit turning the other cheek, and say, look, you want to claim it's profiling?
No, it's this.
So quit lying to everybody.
God forbid, we've come up with 714,000 different ways to say lie, but we can't say lie.
Oh, God, no, we'll offend somebody.
Well, if somebody gets offended because of the truth, it's either time they deal with it or it's time they leave this country.
They are not forced to stay here.
If they want to go back across the ocean, let them go.
But this country by the Tea Party movement is telling our little, shall we say, elected leader in the White House that it doesn't make any difference, no matter how you try to hide your favoritism toward anyone who happens to be Muslim.
If you want to hide your favoritism toward anybody who happens to be a minority, we're not buying your line of crap.
So on Election Day, bring a big cardboard box and get ready to pack your stuff.
We need you to keep everybody focused, but all this dancing and dalliances about terminology is starting to get a lot of people in this country, I think, about as fed up with it as I am.
I don't think I said anything too bad, did I?
Nope.
I mean, you're right down the line.
I was listening to you.
I remember last week, or maybe it was two weeks ago now, where Obama made a pitch to the people that he thought elected him in 2008.
He made a pitch to everybody but white people to get in gear and to support his agenda, whatever it happened to be.
Now, what you have just done here and what you have just said is an illustration of a prediction I made during the campaign.
You might recall, Randy, that during the campaign, everybody was talking about the wonderfulness of the first black president because it would lead to a post-racial America.
Once we had elected a black president, we would forever erase a racist or slavery-oriented past.
The original sin of this country would have been absolved.
And I warned everybody that contrary to that, it's only going to get worse.
The first black president in the White House will create the greatest opportunity for the race industry that there has ever been because all presidents are criticized.
They will simply say every bit of criticism of Obama is based on race, which they're doing.
You criticize his health care bill, you're racist.
If you criticize his immigration stand, you're racist.
If you criticize his budget, you're racist.
This is a, precisely as you say, it's very effective.
It's a technique to silence opposition because nobody's got the guts, certainly in electoral politics, nobody's got the guts to stand up and say that, well, I don't want to criticize the president.
I don't want to be called a racist.
Nobody wants to be called a racist.
And they're afraid to even take on the charge.
So this is how they are blunting criticism from the Republican Party.
The criticism of Obama is coming from other quarters, but it's not coming from much of the Republican Party, except on issues of substantive policy differences, which is where they're trying to keep their opposition to this.
You know, Rush, when Speaker Pelosi was talking about, and you've quoted this many times, we have to pass the bill so we know what's in it.
My God, man, doesn't somebody in Congress have to draw a line someplace?
Or are we going to sit on our heels and watch the forming North America?
Wait a minute.
What can the Republicans do?
They don't have the votes to stop any of this.
What do you want them to do?
They are in solidarity.
Not one Republican is going to vote for cap and trade now.
Not one, they don't have any supporters, no co-sponsors whatsoever on the bill.
They don't have any Republican votes for immigration.
They don't have any Republican votes for health care.
What do you want them to do?
Well, it just seems to me that if Democrats and their programs that they do very well have their little seminars and their little Reverend Jackson and Al Sharptons that at the drop of a hat, here we go, we're mobilized, we're going down there, and we're going to make this a race issue.
I don't care if they're all white people, we're going to make it a race issue.
Then why doesn't the Republican or Conservative Party, Tea Party, something, okay, why don't they have some type of organization, and I'm talking about organization and what they do.
I'm not talking about protest movements.
But why don't they set up some facilities in those border town areas or whatever and speak the opposite side and to speak out and say, no, you're not profiling to say there's a lot of people.
Wait a second.
Randy, now, what do you think the governor of Arizona is doing?
Well, exactly, he is.
No, it's a sheep.
So my point is, you've got a Republican Party down there that is drawing the line, and yet you're calling here and saying, when's somebody going to do something?
Okay, what I'm saying, Rush, is that why doesn't some more of our country's people, and I know there's increased polls that say, yeah, more and more people in the United States agree with that, but why don't we see more of that type of reaction?
Maybe it's because everybody's sitting around waiting for somebody else to give that type of reaction.
Maybe it's because everybody's calling me and saying, why isn't somebody doing something instead of doing something?
Now, there's another reason for this, too.
Well, I know he wants to see conservative action.
We've got conservative activists.
They're out there.
They just don't happen to be elected.
But there's another thing.
We don't have, conservatism is not structured the same way liberalism is.
We don't have factions or constituencies or groups that are aligned for the express purpose of growing the size of government.
We're into the exact opposite.
We try to reduce the power of government.
We try to reduce the power of special interests over people, contrary to what is spelled.
We work.
You know, we've got jobs.
We don't have organizations begging people for money and call it some charity where we siphon off some of the contributions for our lifestyle or our salaries.
We have jobs.
It's a whole different thing.
But Randy, you know, I started to get real frustrated here because you got people putting their political careers on the line in Arizona precisely because the people you don't like are falling down on the job, the Obama people and the feds.
There are any number of young buck conservatives, Marco Rubio, who are doing everything they can.
The Republicans in Utah getting rid of Bob Bennett.
There's a lot of progress going on out there.
But then the minute that happens, we have a bunch of Republicans.
Oh, my God.
Like there's a story in the Politico today.
I guess Klout doesn't carry any weight anymore because Bob Bennett had all kinds of clout and it didn't matter to Republicans.
The Republicans don't care that their guys have.
It's not about clout.
It's about the fact that people are fed up with statism and big government, and they are fed up with Republicans who want to go along with the whole notion that government's first, last, and always, and that government's the solution, and that government's where you make deals.
So when this happens, it's up to people to support these young guys, because for 20 years, people have been saying, what can I do?
And a lot of people have been saying, go get, run for office, get yourself involved in the process and change it.
Okay, then they do that.
And then some of our people then throw dirt on him.
Well, it's a terrible thing to lose Bob Bennett.
All that clout that he had.
No, it's not.
Look at Chris Christie and what he's doing in New Jersey.
There's all kinds of movement going on out here, Randy.
I really, I get, you know what you want?
You want Republicans to stand up and say what you said.
That's what you want.
You want some Republican to stand up and say, don't you understand Obama hates white people.
That's what you want somebody to say.
And that's why Obama's doing what he's doing.
Well, they're not going to do that.
There isn't an elected official that's going to stand up and say, even if they believe it, they're not going to say it.
It's not going to get them anywhere.
But that's what you want.
Aside from that, we're doing pretty damn well for having gotten blown out in elections.
We're doing pretty damn well.
We are the majority in every issue.
Every issue, Obama is the minority.
The problem we have is he doesn't care.
Obama's not winning policy arguments.
Obama is a Chicago thug who is forcing his policies on people with bribes, kickbacks, and all kinds of things at the legislative level.
Anyway, I'm a little long in this segment, my friends.
I must take a brief time out.
We'll come back and continue right after this.
Yes, yes, yes.
I went to the emails.
Rush, you sound like you're taking it a little personally here on that guy.
I am, if I may be so bold to say so.
Look how far we've come from CPAC, my CPAC speech.
In fact, let's go back to that period to January, February of 2009.
Who was it?
There was one voice, pardon me for talking about myself here, one person who said, I hope he fails.
Everybody, Republican and how can you say no, you want the country to fail.
Nope.
You all know what I mean.
I hope his agenda fails.
That's exactly what I said.
And I got criticized from the left, which was to be expected, but I got hit from the right just as well, which I also expected to happen.
And where are we now?
Where are we now since that?
We have Chris Christie.
We have a Republican governor in Virginia.
We got Scott Brown owning the Ted Kennedy seat in Massachusetts.
We got 70% of Massachusetts people agreeing with the Arizona immigration law.
We have 63% of the American people, if not more, all over the country agreeing with the Arizona law.
We're not losing this.
We just don't have the elected strength to do anything about it yet.
That's why November looms large.
We have the Arizona legislation.
We have some really brave Republicans in Arizona who are not backing down against a national and international onslaught against their wall, their law.
The UN's in there claiming human rights violations.
Health care, constitutional challenges.
There are 13, almost 19 states now who are preparing to constitutionally challenge the law.
Just because we don't have our own Al Sharpton doesn't mean we're not doing anything.
Conservatives remember that we, the people, are the government.
We don't have to get into a contest about who can put the most mobs on the street.
That's not how we do things.
That's not how the founders said do things.
We don't do rent-a-mobs.
Every damn one of these Democrat rent-a-mobs is made up of phony baloney plastic banana good time rock and rollers.
They're hustlers of one thing or another.
And everything they're doing at the same time is oriented around fundraising first and then creating tumult and chaos.
Now, we're not about creating tumult and chaos.
We want tranquility.
We want contentment.
We want the pursuit of happiness.
We want opportunity, educational, economic prosperity for every damn person that's in this country.
We do not divide people by groups.
We do not see groups.
We do not look at people and decide that they're not this or not that or not competent based on how they look or how they dress.
It's the left that holds average people in contempt.
So we're making, I think there's a tremendous, rhinos, Republicans in name only are being turned out.
Robert Bennett, Spectre was sent flying to the Democrat Party.
Look at, this is not France.
We don't have our competing special interest groups out there creating havoc on the streets.
It's people like Saul Alinsky and Obama who think policy should be decided by who can put the bigger rent-a-mob on the street and cause the most chaos.
That isn't what the framers had in mind.
I think there's tremendous progress, reasons for optimism taking place.
Not to say that we should sit back and enjoy what's happening.
Obviously, I'm not saying that.
But it's also not correct to sit here and whine and moan and complain that nobody's doing anything, especially when you're not doing anything yourself, but asking what somebody else is going to do for you.
Back in a second.
You probably don't know this.
Newark, New Jersey just elected a conservative black mayor.
He's a Democrat.
But the left threw every, his name is Corey Booker.
The left threw everything they had at this guy.
And he's a Democrat, conservative Democrat black.
He won by 24 points.
Conservative Democrat black.
And one of his themes was he is sick of race politics.
And he's trying to dismantle the patronage system there.