All Episodes
Previous Next
May 12, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:38
May 12, 2010, Wednesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Alright, now, now I'm starting to get.
See, I was not the only one who didn't know of this.
This medal for restraint.
I am being bombarded with emails from friends who are Marines who had no clue about this.
Um there's a lot of people fit to be tied.
Here's the story.
This now, this is the Navy Times version of this.
U.S. troops in Afghanistan could soon be awarded a medal for not doing something.
A precedent-setting award that would be given for courageous restraint for holding fire to save civilian lives.
The uh idea is consistent with our approach, explained Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Tad Schultz.
Yeah, our young men and women display remarkable courage every day, including situations where they refrain from using lethal force, even at risk to themselves in order to prevent possible harm to civilians.
In some situations, our forces face in Afghanistan that restraint is an act of discipline and courage, not much different than those seen in combat actions.
Soldiers often recognize for non-combat achievements with decorations like their services commendation medal, but most of the highest U.S. military decorations are for valor in combat.
A medal to recognize a conscious effort to avoid a combat action would be unique.
Uh Schultas said, We absolutely support the right of our forces to defend themselves.
We have to say that.
We're not talking about a basketball team's not allowed to go to Arizona here, folks.
We're talking about the U.S. military.
We have to say we've got this guy saying, we absolutely support the right of our forces to defend themselves.
Well, that's comforting.
Is that in the policy manual someplace?
Somebody have to take a test on that.
We absolutely support the right of our forces to defend themselves.
Valuing restraint in a uh in a potentially dangerous situation is not the same thing as denying troops the right to employ lethal force when they determine that it is necessary.
A spokesman for the 2.2 million veterans of the VFW, the veterans of foreign wars, thinks the award could cause confusion among the ranks and send a bad signal.
The self-protections built into the rules of engagement are clear.
Not under Obama, they're not.
And the decision to return fire must be made instantly based on training and the threat.
Said Joe Davis, a spokesman for the VFW.
The enemy hides, already hides among noncombatants and targets them too.
The creation of such an award will only embolden their actions and put more American Can you just see the ceremony now?
I can I can I can just see the ceremony.
Obama at the White House, the Distinguished Yellow Cross, a giant ceremony, thousands and thousands of military troops, the uh you know brought into the East Room for the uh presentation of their medals for courageous restraint,
and then you have the most courageous soldier of the year, and we get shocking details of the exact circumstances in which he exercised this courageous restraint not to fire.
Can you just see this happening?
See, with this bunch, I can't, I can totally see this bunch doing something like that.
If you're gonna go, if you're gonna do this, folks, let's go all the way, let's make it posthumous because that's gonna be the result of this.
I I can you imagine if you are uh Al-Zawahiri and you're in a cave someplace in Afghanistan, and somehow you've got wireless internet, and you're over there in your cave and you're connected, probably maybe even listening to this show, and you're hearing about this.
You mean the Americans are going to award themselves medals for the nut shooting?
Oh they do Allah!
Allah!
Can you just see this?
Um I mean they got they terrorists have to be laughing their butts off.
Now, what's gonna happen here in Afghanistan?
Now the there will be immediate changes in terrorist training.
Everybody will be trained to look and act like a civilian.
Oh, man.
Liberalism.
People who hate the military.
People who think the military is the focus of evil in the modern world.
And wait till we have that medal ceremony.
Wait till we have that.
In the meantime, we tried to convict three SEALs on trumped up evidence of busting some uh terrorist lip who had murdered a bunch of Americans.
Thankfully they were acquitted, but just the idea that they were court-martialed in Iraq.
Amazing.
I want to grab a couple of phone calls here because this next issue has got people worked up to uh uh a fever pitch.
By the way, I'm told this is a NATO idea.
Uh and that the Navy Times story, if you read further here, says it's a NATO idea.
Just let France back in.
This is France now, courageous medal for surrender.
This is a way to get France back into the upper echelon of uh of bravery and valor.
Here's Kent in Canton, Illinois.
Kent, uh glad you called.
Welcome to the EIB network, sir.
Great to have you here.
Quite an honor to talk to you, right?
You bet, sir.
Yeah, I was uh just south of Chicago today listening to you on WLS, and during one of the breaks, they came over with a story about uh a girls' basketball team from Highland Park who won their conference championship for the first time in 26 years, and were scheduled to go play in Arizona, had bake sales and stuff to raise money, and school officials decided because of the immigration law and their objection to that that they were going to cancel that trip for them.
Right.
Isn't that amazing?
No.
I don't mean to be flippant with my answer.
I I know that there is a uh tremendous amount of outrage over this today, which I think is good.
Because Kevin or Kent, what what's happening here is that it's on full display now.
Who liberals are is on full display.
The fact that there is enormous anger and outrage over this, I find healthy.
Not that I support the circumstance, not that I'm you know thinking that that that the right decision by the stretch the imagination just the exact opposite.
But anything to help identify who these people really are, I think is a bonus.
The fact that people are fit to be tied over this is great.
This is who liberals are.
See, this the I the reason, I mean, I don't mean to be smug here, uh, Kent, for 21 years plus behind this, the golden EIB microphone.
I have been telling people this is who they are.
Now, after all of those years, they are confirming what I've said.
The kind of people they are, the way they think, and it is totally contradictory to the way they have set things up about themselves.
This is pure nonsense.
They say they do things for the children.
They're putting their political beliefs ahead of the it's just like the Sierra Club, allowing their own kids to be used in a propaganda video about Barack Obama telling lies about the two, using their own kids to advance a fraudulent phony agenda.
So here you have a bunch of liberals that run this school who are no different than your garden variety liberals anywhere else.
And the fact that this girls' basketball team won the conference championship for the first time in 26 doesn't matter.
But the chance they've got the to go on and and uh experience the expansion of their horizons by going down to Arizona and playing as a result.
No, no, no, that doesn't count.
Arizona, we have to make our statement here.
We have to tell everybody we're not racist.
We have to tell everybody Arizona's full of racist.
We have to tell everybody we don't support what Arizona's.
Look at us, we're good people.
You have a bunch of childish, immature, liberal little adults running this school who care more about what people think of them and what they think of each other than they do about any Kid anywhere.
I mean, the idea that liberals care about kids anyway and put them first is is uh is nonsensical.
Somebody else in the John and Montgomery Illinois, you're next on the EIB network, sir.
Hello.
Russ Limbaugh, diddos, my friend.
That's the okay.
Thank you.
Hey, uh Kent, God bless you.
I thought I'd be the only one here in the Soviet Republic of Illinois to uh to have heard that story, and uh I am outraged, Russ.
The uh inmates have taken over the asylum.
And they have been taking it over for years.
You're exactly right.
And you know, people calling up and uh like Kent and yourself uh saying what you say every day.
Uh it's waking people up, Rush.
And I did make a phone call to the Highland Park High School, and of course I was put on hold and uh then went to uh secretary, and the secretary was was basically saying that they're afraid of the backlash of uh the large uh population uh of Mexican population around the school and in the school.
And uh it's just it's just one of me.
Uh that they're afraid.
Wait a second.
They are a f who the school official you talked to said that they are afraid of a backlash of the large Mexican population that lives around the school.
Yeah, they were afraid of the backlash and uh of the Mexican the large population in the school and throughout the community.
And the uh they don't want any trouble, basically.
And uh I just I couldn't as soon as I started saying.
Well, give these people the courageous medal for restraint.
This is a classic give these people make them the first recipients.
Yeah.
Well, you know, and that's that's the problem that we're having here in the Soviet Republic.
And and hopefully, you know, the the state gets rid of these these uh ponies we have, uh Dick Durbin, and uh I don't know, Rush.
I just it's an honor to talk to you and uh just I'm one voice of of many.
I know a lot of people listen to you, my friends in Naplesville.
They're all over you.
Umly but surely uh we're we're getting to them.
Well, I know.
But but more importantly, we've we've been getting to them for years.
Um here here's something.
I want you to call these people back, John.
You want to you really want to do something?
Why don't you call these people back?
Say, hi, you remember me.
You just you just told me you were afraid of a Mexican backlash.
You I've I've thought about what you told me, Madam Secretary.
You are afraid of Mexicans in Illinois.
You are afraid.
First of all, don't you think you're being rather racist?
Don't you think you're being rather bigoted to assume that all these Mexicans are going to storm the school and cause you problem?
Why do you think who who who do you think you are to be making these kinds of value judgments against our wonderful neighbors to the South?
You are afraid they're going to do what?
Attack the school and blow it up, throw rocks to the windows?
What are these dreaded Mexicans gonna do?
How do you bigoted people think?
And then after she answers the question, then what you say, John, is okay, well, can you imagine living in Ma in Arizona?
Can you imagine living in Arizona near the border?
What would you do then, Madam Secretary, Highland Park has crew?
What would you do?
So you're afraid of Mexicans in Illinois.
What would you do if you lived in Arizona?
I would never move to Arizona because why?
Why don't you move out of Illinois if it's as that dangerous in your school district?
Why don't you move out of the why does it call for boycotts in Illinois too?
This is how you lose things, folks.
You give up.
You bend over, you grab the ankles, you do whatever, you succumb.
You don't fight for what you believe in.
You don't stand up for decency.
It's uh look what's happened.
The Arizona law, it turns out to be the most effective deportation technique the country's tried in a long time.
I gotta run here a little long, but we'll be back and continue right after this.
Hey, I got it, folks.
After the after the courageous medal for restraint.
Let's have another medal.
The works and play as well with the enemy medal.
And I'll give kids in kindergarten gold stars.
Works and plays well with other children.
Well, let's have the works and plays well with the enemy medal.
You want a sample note from one of my Marine buddies?
Great one.
I cannot believe what I just heard you say on the radio.
Combat medal for restraint?
Maybe those three Navy SEALs should have taken a terrorist out for dinner, gotten him a prostitute.
That way they wouldn't have been court martialed.
They would have been given a medal for restraint.
I can guarantee you, Marines like General Chesty Puller are rolling over in their graves right now.
Simperfy big dick.
AKA the field marshal calls his wife the Martin of Warden.
Um this school business in Illinois.
If you don't do something because you are afraid of a backlash, isn't that a form of terrorism?
If you don't do something because you're afraid of a reaction from a mob, then aren't you allowing the mob to win?
It's just like remember those those those kids at Morgan City High School in California that showed up on Cinco the Mile with the American flag call.
They were sent home.
Because the cowards running the school thought, oh my God, it's gonna cause trouble.
In this case, the American flag was deemed the problem.
American Fag was a problem.
Flag was the problem.
We're gonna send them home.
And now in Illinois.
Yeah, the fact that we won is a problem.
We can't we can't go to Arizona.
It might cause a backlash here in Arizona.
So we can't we can't send children on a vacation, essentially, to Arizona because somebody's gonna rise up.
So what are we doing to ourselves here?
We're just we're turning into a well, not all of us, but the the people engage in this kind of stuff are turning into full-fledged hundred percent cowards.
One you doubt me, Sturdley.
Okay, maybe they okay.
You're arguing over a verb.
I can't, I cannot catch a break today.
I haven't read comic books.
Now I'm being disputed over the use of a verb.
Okay, they've been cowards for a long time.
It's the point is still made.
Uh Matthew in Fargo, North Dakota.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Hi.
Thanks for having me.
You bet, sir.
All right, so basically, well, when I called in, I just wanted to know.
I'm 22-year-old.
Um I was looking at going into the medical profession.
I wanted to be a pediatric surgeon.
But uh health care bill, I don't know where that's going, but basically, um I want to know what can I do here in Fargo, North Dakota.
I've it's a pretty conservative area.
Everyone pretty much thinks alike.
Um there's not too much that can be done.
I know that Earl Palmer voted for the health care reform bill after I sent him numerous emails, and I did click the please please contact me.
Never did.
Does this did you mean Earl Pomeroy?
Yeah.
Yeah.
We've had Oh, I wish we had that call.
His his nephew called 20 years ago.
And just ripped Earl Pomeroy to shreds.
Uh it was the funniest thing.
It was a coward.
Well, he's turning into a coward.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Just what so what what what do you what do you think can happen here?
I mean, what there's like I said, there's a lot of conservatives here, a lot of like-minded people.
What's what's a good way to get out and get things going?
Well, what do you mean uh specifically by get out and get things going?
You mean rallying against Obama, rallying against everything?
Yeah, yeah.
I mean, you know, we as a as a state here, we we pretty much vote conservative, but uh you know, everyone we elect, you know, almost everyone we elect pretty much goes the other way.
Well like that's like the people that we have in, I guess.
This is a uh this is a lament that a lot of people have.
Their elected official goes the other way on them once they they don't stay true to their uh campaign.
They go to Washington to become uh something else.
Here's here's the thing.
Uh you're you're 22 years old, and it is a blessing that you care enough at age twenty-two to be so involved and so concerned that you want to do something about this.
The first thing I would tell you to do is to don't get discouraged by all of the predictable things that are going to happen in the world of politics.
I always tell people to become the go-to person in their group.
Whenever somebody in your group of family or friends, when they've got a political question or a cultural question, you be the guy that has the answer.
You be the guy that can answer all these questions because that's how you persuade people.
The objective here for you is to persuade as many people as possible.
That's what we're all trying to do.
And we do it in our own ways, and we do it within our own spheres.
But you're just 22.
You're, I mean, you're just starting out.
You're s you are way ahead of the game with what you already know, the sophistication you already have about these kinds of things.
And the the we we we fix things in the ballot box in this country.
And if you elect somebody, and it turns out that they have um misled you, you just get rid of them.
And you learn next time, you learn how to identify who these people are so that they don't fool you again.
And then you stay true to what it is that you've learned.
And you uh, if you're gonna vocally or publicly support these people, you make it clear what your support is worth and what you expect.
And you're you're going to get discouraged.
People are people, and politicians especially are going to disappoint you.
So during the whole course of all this, make sure that you are able to rely on yourself in your own life to accomplish what you want to accomplish.
Don't let the idiocy of some people in Washington penalize your achievement.
They may make it harder for you, but you can overcome them.
Now look at this, folks.
The federal deficit for April 2010 has just been released.
The federal deficit for April 2010 has an all-time record.
82.7 billion dollars.
Excuse me, 82.7 billion dollars.
That is more than four times the deficit in April of 2009.
82.7 billion dollars for one month.
An all-time high, four times the deficit in April 2009.
And our president gets hold of the Prime Minister of Spain today to lecture him on runaway deficit spending.
And is bailing out Greece.
I want to go back.
Yeah, we're gonna get to Elena Kagan here in just a second.
I've really got to say something about her here in just a second.
I frankly don't understand.
But in just a second, our young caller from Fargo, North Dakota, a 22-year-old guy, Earl Pomeroy, is already running ads for real.
He's toast.
Earl Pomeroy is probably toast in Fargo, North Dakota.
The Democrats have no idea what's going to happen to them in November.
Well, I think some of them do.
They're quitting, they're retiring, they're resigning, and so forth and so on.
But here's here's here's the uh a good way to illustrate what this young man from Fargo was asking about.
People campaign, make you think they're one thing, they go to Washington, end up being something else.
How do you stay involved?
How do you avoid getting ticked off to the point, eh, hell with it?
I'm just gonna go do things and try to keep these people from destroying my life.
Arlen sp uh uh uh uh uh uh Orrin Hatch and Lindsey Graham have announced that they're leaning toward voting for Kagan.
This is what is wrong with our guys.
You would never hear the Democrats say that about any of our nominees at this stage of the process.
We we have a president who sought to filibuster Sam Alito.
Sam Alito is a genius, highly qualified in every respect.
The president tried to filibuster him.
Our guys say the filibuster's not on the table Right now.
So what this tells me is that we still have a lot of people in Washington who do not understand the mood of the public and who still do not have the guts to stand up to Obama.
And that's where it really comes still for whatever reason, which is beyond me.
Maybe they don't have things they want to have things said about them that are said about me, for example.
Maybe they don't want to have things written about them that are written about me and others.
But I don't understand at this point in time, the public mood is totally opposed to everything Obama stands for.
And yet we still have people in Washington who are afraid to stand up to him.
Why did Obama pick Kagan?
Everybody, there are cartoons about her qualifications and the lack thereof.
Let me tell you who she is.
She is a budding communist.
This is a woman who believes that we ought to have somebody in charge of who can say what.
This is a woman who believes that free speech needs to be regulated by an independent body that will decide whether or not what you say is harmful to somebody else, and you can't say it.
Kagan says a government motive is proper focus in a First Amendment case.
She backs limits on speech that can do harm.
Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan said the high court should be focused on ferreting out improper government motives when deciding First Amendment cases, arguing the government's reasons for restricting free speech were what mattered most, and not necessarily the effect of those restrictions on speech.
Well, there you have look.
What else do you need to know?
The First Amendment is something she doesn't like.
The government should have the authority to restrict free speech when they think it's doing harm.
Like to who?
Obama.
Kagan, who is the solicitor general, expressed that idea in her 1996 article, a University of Chicago Law Review entitled Private Speech Public Purpose, The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine.
Now, this this puts her in the camp with one of the czars, Cass Sunstein, who believes the same thing.
So as far as I'm concerned, I don't care what else she's done.
I don't care how much she's written on post-it notes.
I don't care how much she's written anywhere.
This puts her in the Hugo Chavez world, folks.
This aligns her with communist dictators throughout history.
The government will determine when speech is proper.
She thinks that's okay.
She also has written a senior thesis on the problems inherent in the decline of socialism.
So why did Obama pick her?
He picked her because he knows her very well.
Obama and Kagan go way back.
He knows who she is.
And who is she?
She's a rubber stamp.
Sonia Sotomayor, a rubber stamp.
Kristen Gillibrand, a rubber stamp for Chuck Hugh Schumer in the Senate from New York.
In fact, the less independent of thought she is, the better, as far as Obama's concerned.
Rubber stamp.
Obama can't put himself on the Supreme Court, so he's going to put people who are as close to who he is and what he thinks as he can find.
And that's who she is.
And that to me says, oppose her.
But no, we got guys afraid of standing up to Obama.
Don't have the guts to stand up to him.
You know, what these people, even on our side inside the beltway, don't understand.
People are sick and tired, not just Tea Party people.
Most Americans are sick and tired.
They now they've got buyer's remorse.
They do not like what's happening here.
Orrin Hatch and Lindsey Graham may be surprised to find that most Americans do not A read the New York Times and B, do not agree with it.
They might be surprised to learn that most people don't read the Washington Post and most people don't agree with the Washington Post.
There's a political story today.
Roughly half of Utah voters would vote for somebody other than Hatch if he were up for reelection this year.
He's not.
He's up in 2012.
This is a Mason Dixon poll released yesterday, commissioned by the Salt Lake Tribune.
Break from ideological purity, that's one of the things in the in the story.
How come it's only our guys that are accused of ideological purity, and then they have to go out and prove that they're not ideologically pure?
And what is Hatch is not ideologically pure anyway.
He worked for the S Chip program.
Now he bailed out on government health care, but but he he was among those trying to salvage it until he jumped overboard on it.
And I remember when Orn Hatch, and I like the guy.
I've talked, I don't know how many times.
I when he first came to the Senate, this he was solid.
He was a fighter, he wanted to advance liberty.
But now that the election of Obama has just got our guys hand tied.
There's just they're afraid to stand up to him at all.
And I don't know who they're what are they what do they think they're proving here?
Who are they impressing by saying I think I have no problem with Elena K. Who who are they gonna get the gold star from for that?
What is it?
You know, maybe you want to support her, but don't say it now.
The confirmation hasn't even begun.
We don't even know what this woman's gonna say.
But if I if if I can find out that the woman thinks the f the First Amendment ought to be altered and a government ought to have some authority to determine who can say what and who can't, what else do we need to know?
Especially me, folks, I am in the free speech business.
I don't need to know anything else about the woman, although I do.
Now there's something else going on with this woman that actually to me is kind of hilarious.
The Wall Street Journal is coming, this is the Orlando Sentinel, but everybody's talking about this today.
The Wall Street Journal's come under heavy criticism from gay and lesbian organizations after it published a 17-year-old picture of Elena Kagan playing softball under a front page headline, court nominee comes to the plate.
Uh Kathy Renna, a former spokesperson for Glad, the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Criticism, said it clearly is an allusion to her being gay.
It's just too easy, a punchline.
The question from a journalistic perspective is whether it's a descriptive representation of who she might be as a judge.
Have you ever seen a picture of Clarence Thomas bowling?
The Wall Street Journal is denying any gay undertones in its selection of the photo and headline, while White House officials have denied that Elena Kagan is gay.
There was a CBS blog a week ago, last week, sometime put a post up that she was gay.
The White House got really mad about it, said she's not, and then they they took it down.
Now they've they've got some friends of hers out there saying, no, no, she's she's she's she's not gay.
My question is, what's wrong with being gay?
I what would somebody tell me?
It's not a bad picture.
She's sitting there, she's at the plate, looks pretty, looks like she's having fun, like she's got a good stance, looks like she knows how to hit softball.
What's wrong with being gay?
Would somebody explain that to me?
Why is it?
I don't know if only gays play softball.
That's not that's not my point here.
We've got we've got an entire political party in a stealth way, some of them public about it, stealth way, trying to do everything they can to get gay marriage is the law of the land.
We have the the Democrat Party is uh one of its most powerful uh constituents is is uh gay activists, lesbians and gays.
So what I don't understand is what's the problem?
I mean, for the Democrat Party, it ought to be a badge of honor.
I mean, if we're if we're trying to put together a Supreme Court that represents America, that understands the despised and disadvantaged, as their good marshall said, what's wrong with being gay?
Why are they acting so defensive about this?
Somebody's gonna have to explain this to me because it's not computing.
I'm I'm serious.
I'm not look, folks, I'm not trying to be provocative here.
From the first moment the subject of her sexual orientation came up, I've been scratching my head.
How can that possibly matter on the Democrat side of things?
Do we really think that some senator's going to ask her?
You think so.
You think they're trying to provoke Republicans to say something stupid about it?
Well.
Well, until if if if the Republicans don't say something stupid about it, what it looks to me like is that the Democrats are the ones that have a problem with it.
Which is what I don't understand.
The Republicans are out there.
Republicans are running for cover on practically everything here that has to do with Obama.
They're not going to say anything here.
Certainly none of the senators.
I don't know that this Wall Street Journal thing is the closest thing the White House has got to say.
Aha, aha!
Bigot.
Homophobe.
That's the closest thing they got is this picture out there.
A picture of her playing softball.
What do I not know about women playing softball?
What what what is there to learn about this?
Is there some sort of secret cabal of it?
Is that how you I have well yeah, if it is, it's a secret.
So I from the Democrat standpoint, I do not understand what's wrong here.
I would think it would be a resume enhancement.
And yet they're defensive as they can be about it.
And welcome back, Rush Limbaugh, the fastest three hours in media.
See, if you are um if you're one of the thousands of listeners uh who took action last year during National Make a Will Month, congratulations.
Did you did you know that there even was National Make a Will Month?
Well, you do now.
By making a will or a living trust on legalzoom.com, you have protected your family and provided peace of mind.
You might want to look at the revocable trust as instead of a will because a will gets probate and everybody knows what happens.
But regardless, whatever you want, LegalZoom can do it.
This is your chance right now to do it.
In honor of National Make a Will Month, you can make your will for just sixty-nine dollars at legalzoom.com.
This is one of these things.
Nobody likes to do this.
Because it obviously you're focusing on something you don't want to think about.
Sixty-nine bucks, though, and it's a it's a very, very smart, wise thing to do.
Don't let time and money keep you from protecting your family with a living trust or a will.
Uh visit legalzoom.com and just complete a simple questionnaire.
LegalZoom.com will mail your personalized living trust or last will to your door within 48 hours.
And if you order your living trust now, you'll save even more with a free will.
LegalZoom.com is not a law firm.
It was started by top attorneys to provide self-help services at your specific direction.
Legalzoom.com, that's legalzoom.com.
Kevin Defiance Ohio.
Welcome to the EIV network, sir.
Great to have you here.
Hey, Rush, it's a pleasure to talk to you.
Thank you.
Hey, I I just uh hearing this courageous response, Metal.
You know, first I like the our military does a great job, and I appreciate them.
But um it just it just outraged me, outrages me, and I think the the first nominee for our medal should be our courageous response.
Uh restraint president who seems to be restraining himself with every one of our enemies and uh refuses to do anything to our enemies but makes enemies of our friends.
Well, you know.
Uh it's a NATO idea, and therefore Obama could be eligible.
Well, I I think it's just I don't know if we would call it courageous response.
Maybe cowardice response be a better title.
No, it's courageous restraint.
Well, restraint.
Courageous restraint.
Restraint.
So maybe call it a it's a medal for doing nothing.
Right.
So with Obama, we could call it cowardice restraint.
Well, no, we know we don't, we don't, we don't want to we don't want to go that far with this.
Uh but it's gonna cause all kinds of problems.
You wait, that they're they're uh they will not appreciate the irony of this, but they will award one of these posthumously one day.
Wait till that happens.
The uh the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee held hearings today on the potty parity act.
The uh potty parity act bill to address the unequal number of restroom facilities for women in uh federal buildings.
Yeah.
It's a good thing Congress doesn't waste its uh valuable time on nonsense with so many pressing issues.
The Potty Parity Act.
They must be in danger of losing the women vote as well.
See you tomorrow, folks.
▲
Export Selection