All Episodes
Previous Next
May 10, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:46
May 10, 2010, Monday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of The Rush 24-7 podcast.
Yeah, about fell out of my chair today after uh after Obama nominated Elena Kagan to the uh U.S. Supreme Court, and I'm looking up there at Mess NBC, and they've got this graphic up there that says she could move the court to the right.
And I'm saying, boy, the White House knows who they picked here because if it's on MSNBC, it's a White House talking point.
All strategic.
CNN Roland Martin black guy has a piece about he doesn't like her.
She's not left enough.
When she was a Harvard Law Dean, she filled 28 out of 29 openings there with white guys.
Greetings, folks.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
L Rushbow here at a full week of broadcast excellence.
Telephone numbers 800-282-288-2, the email address L Rushbow at EIBNet.com.
Look, Obama has chosen himself in a different gender.
Sexual gender.
It it's identical.
No paper trail.
Don't know anything about her.
All we got's platitudes.
New York Times has a story printed out to five pages long that is an it's a mirror image of a story, the kind of story they would do on Obama during the pre-campaign and the campaign.
But we don't know anything about it.
Looks at Ed Meese has a great point today, and I'm going to get into this in greater detail, but this is not actually going to be the lead item here today.
But Ed Ed Meese says, you know, the fact that she didn't have a paper trail, if our guys in the Senate are up to it, this is a great opportunity to find out about this woman's mind.
That's what we need to find out.
What is in her mind?
And uh due to exhaustive research that I personally conducted today on this, I think I can give you a pretty good idea.
What is in her mind?
She is a pure academic elitist radical.
She comes from the faculty lounge.
She is a utopian theoretician.
And she believes essentially that the uh the oh, there's a phrase the despised and disadvantaged.
Ed Mies found that in one of her writings.
And I said, Well, where despised and the court exists to serve the despised and disadvantaged.
I've traced it back to Thurgood Marshall.
Well, yeah, but by the time we finish today, folks, you're gonna know more about this woman than Obama knows about her.
And they were colleagues at the University of Chicago Law School.
But I want to talk about money first.
I want to talk about how the fact that nobody has any.
We have just, yes, we have just bailed out Greece and the European Union, the borrowing window at the Federal Reserve is open, almost one trillion dollars.
Now you might be saying, what do you mean, Rush?
We I read that the European Union's the European Union showed up at Ben Bernanke's borrowing window.
And guess what?
We're loaning them a trillion dollars, but it's unsecured.
There's no collateral.
If they go belly up, guess who's paying for it, folks?
You and me.
Now we haven't even gotten to bailing out California yet, and they're in worse shape than Greece.
We're gonna have to borrow to the trillion or print it.
They're printing Euros to handle all that.
Nobody hasn't even we are witnessing right before our very eyes what happens with unchecked, uncontrolled socialism, and worse.
And I'll tell you as I have been saying on this program, everybody's talking about the uh uh the Greek politicians and how they've uh overextended themselves, passing out all these benefits and so forth.
As I have been saying on this program about some people in this country.
For years since this program began, it's one thing to blame the politicians, but you cannot exempt the Greek people.
They're the ones who demanded it.
They're the ones who wanted the state to support them with lifestyles that are unsustainable.
The the if if the private sector is not producing enough wealth for people to enter it, go into a job or career and share in the spoils and hopefully grow the private sector if all of their existence is in the form of this government check or that government check or this government program.
At some point, it collapses because there isn't Any money.
It's become a cliche now, but it's actually true.
Margaret Thatcher brilliantly said the problem with socialism is you run out of other people's money.
They've run out of other people's money in Greece.
They've run out of other people's money in the UK.
They're about to run out of other people's money in Spain and Portugal.
And we essentially are out of other people's money because we're in the red too.
So it's, you know, it it's it's one thing to sit here and get mad at what the Greek politicians or anybody, EU or you know, our our elected officials, but let's not exempt the people who demand this stuff.
Let's not accept uh uh exempt the citizens who willfully accept 40 million people on food stamps.
The city of Los Angeles has just said they don't have the money to fix sidewalks, nor more money to repair sidewalks.
However, a record number of Americans on food stamps.
Well, you don't get re-elected.
There aren't any votes to be had by fixing sidewalks, but there are votes to be had by giving people money to go out and buy food or whatever they can scam at the local quickshop, grocery store, or wherever else they happen to be redeeming their uh their food stamps.
So it's a it's a vicious, vicious cycle right in front of our eyes.
We are seeing what happens.
We've and we've seen it throughout world history.
We've seen it in the Soviet Union.
Communism, socialism, it cannot sustain itself.
Communism morally as well as economically, socialism morally and economically as well.
And you know, Fannie Mayor Freddie Mac, one of the two, they've asked for some more money.
8.4 billion dollars.
When does this when does this stop?
You know, Barney Frankson, well, they're essentially now public utilities.
The government's taking them over.
Whatever they're running, and now uh guess what the Congress is saying they have to do?
We must investigate what happened to the stock market last week.
We must hold hearings to find out how it dropped a thousand points in 20 minutes.
Whoopy do.
So the very people who cause these problems or participate in causing these problems now have to have a we have to have a blue ribbon committee, a blue ribbon panel to look into all this to find out exactly what happened.
In fact, I have I got a uh an idea, uh, ladies and gentlemen, how Obama might want to deal with this oil spill.
Do you realize they continue?
I guess it's not that big of a surprise.
They continue to impugn, malign, and misreport what I have said about the oil spill not being a big deal.
It's still all over the media.
But here's what here's what British petroleum ought to do.
Because everybody's pointing fingers of blame at them.
Take a lesson from the Barack Obama School of Problem Solving.
Hold a one-day oil spill summit with as many experts, college professors, uh, academics, elitists, other wackos who have never accomplished anything in their lives either, particularly where oil is concerned.
Have them sit around and then to dispatch them in study groups and have them submit ideas on how to cap the leak.
And then, after they study groups for two or three hours, you all you just all in one day.
This is how you fix the oil spill in one day.
With an oil spill summit, then you announce a blue ribbon committee to study the ideas from the oil spill summit and release the results after an election or some other favorable date.
It would also help to have the media in your back pocket.
Uh that's um might not be as difficult as it might sound.
The media is so thoroughly corrupt, a relatively small bribe could do the trick.
Call it off-book consulting fees and watch the positive stories roll in.
Wouldn't you want to see BP do this?
The Obama School of Problem Solving, a saw, a summit.
On the oils, and bring in Lena Kagan, I mean, she's, I mean, they're singing her intellectual praise.
Bring her in there.
Uh, all kinds of people from Harvard and Yale.
The Barack Obama solution to problem solving.
More money stories.
The Associated Press.
A Miami woman who exhausted her unemployment aid needs to pay bills.
A Phoenix job seeker wants a greater sense of purpose.
A Boston woman has heard that hiring is picking up.
The economy absorbed a flood of eight hundred five thousand new job seekers last month, the sharpest monthly influx in seven years.
They were driven by economic need, renewed optimism, and evidence that more employers are hiring.
And they're right.
Companies added a net total of 290,000 jobs in April, almost in four years, it was actually under 70,000 in the private sector when you take out the census workers and so forth.
Yet so many people poured into the workforce that they drove up the unemployment rate from 9.7 to 9.9%.
We went through this all last Friday.
There's so much excitement out there.
People realize their jobs to be handsome entering the job market, willing to be counted again, and that means the unemployment rate goes up.
Hundreds of thousands more will likely join them in the coming months, drawn by the improving economy.
And in bold font, and the real reason, wait for it.
The possibility that Congress will not continually extend unemployment benefits.
And there you have it.
They're not looking for work because they're no longer disheartened.
They're looking because their benefits have run out or are about to run out.
So the associated purpose of this story is to is to s is to set up the reason for higher unemployment numbers.
They're going to continue to pound this into everybody's skull so that when the unemployment rate continues to go up, we are to believe it is excellent news because it means the economy's coming back, and the people are entering the job market because they now are excited about the prospects of finding a job when the truth is the benefits have run out.
If the benefits had run out in Greece, they wouldn't be in the mess that they are in.
There's a lot of people guilty here in bringing about the demise of Greece.
But there is one thing overall that is responsible for it, and it is called socialism.
It is called statism.
It is called laziness.
It is called entitlement mentality expectation on the part of people who vote for people who will send them gifts and send them money without any concern or thought of where is this money coming from.
Right.
Quick time out, my friends.
Off to a rousing start.
And yeah, we're going to get to this Kagan baby.
But look at it's no surprise they're going to nominate leftist radicals to replace a leftist radical.
There's no surprise there.
You don't really need to go too deep in analyzing the babe.
But it is interesting.
There's a law professor out there from HR, your story.
Some university that says, this woman, this woman's worse than Harriet Myers.
This is a liberal law professor.
This woman Kagan is less than or worse than Harriet Myers.
Intellectually, she says she's uh a lightweight, uh, this law professor says, so that the trying to paint the picture here that the left is not all ecstatic with her, and that she might move the court to the right.
But when you look at who's reporting this, they're all part of the Obama media network.
Uh MSNBC, Politico, you name it.
Back in just a second.
If Elena Kagan, and I don't think this way, I I just I don't think this way, but everybody on the left thinks in terms of identity politics.
So I thought I would try my hand at it.
So if Elena Kagan is confirmed in the Supreme Court, there will be no white male Protestants on the court.
Now, does uh is is that the uh a court that will look like the United States?
Which is what Obama says we want here.
But this woman Kagan, she supposedly is there to make sure the court deals with the despised and the downtrodden, with the despised and The poor and so forth.
She doesn't know anything about it.
She's lived at Harvard.
She's lived at Hyde Park in Chicago inside of Beltway in the upper west side of Manhattan.
As is the case with all liberal elitist theoreticians, they have no clue how real Americans live.
They think they know how Americans ought to live.
And that is what they want to use the judiciary for.
They're totally animated by their prejudices and their biases.
Well, no, no, snurdly minute.
Keep jumping back and forth.
Have you ever tried he's in you're gonna Russia gonna be in real trouble here if you start blaming the people for these financial problems?
I'm not blaming them all.
But look at Greece.
The people write, have you ever tried to take candy from a baby?
Have you ever well I've tried it?
I tried to take a toy away from the dog, a dog goes bananas.
You know, it's it's I'm not saying that citizens are dogs.
I'm I'm not.
Limboss says Greeks are dogs.
I'm not, I'm not saying that.
They're they're babies.
You know the old Zauba trying to take candy from a baby.
It's the New York Times today, Paul Campos.
Uh a law professor, University of Colorado Boulder writing in the Daily Beast.
Uh compared Elena Kagan to Harriet Myers, whose nomination by Bush, as you know, collapsed amid an uprising among conservatives who considered her unqualified and not demonstrably committed to their judicial philosophies.
The headline of the piece is the next Harriet Myers.
But she's not the next Harriet Myers.
She is the next Barack Obama.
This is what everybody's got to realize.
He's simply picking mirror images of himself.
And I'm going to get to it in time.
This New York Times story, which is a puff piece profile, it is striking how similar these two people are, at least in the way they were reported on by the regime's state control media.
You know, the she's more qualified than Obama, but that's about it.
He still is the most unqualified guy in whatever room he walks into.
And she's just a uh, you know, a notch uh above.
She's supposed to be a consensus builder, open-minded, postpartisan, just like Obama was supposed to be.
I mean, there's those are the words in the New York Times piece.
Consensus builder, open-minded, postpartisan.
And of course, we know that none of that that we were told about Obama is true.
And it's probably not true of um Elena Kagan.
Now, liberals will never object seriously to her not being qualified.
I mean, it's it doesn't matter.
The only qualification is that you be liberal.
And that you believe that the Supreme Court is to rewrite the Constitution.
If you believe the Constitution is outdated and no longer serves a purpose, like Thurgood Marshall thought.
And she was she was uh an accolyte of Thurgood Marshall, then that's all the qualification you need.
She hasn't been a judge.
She was in the private sector of private, well no, she had Obama praised her today for not being a corporate lawyer.
Instead, she went into service.
Uh I think she even plays basketball.
I think she plays basketball.
Rumor is that she smokes.
I'm telling you, uh a mirror image of Obama.
You know, they were both at the University of Chicago Law School, but she was a genuine professor.
He was not, he was just a lecturer teaching Olinski tactics on how to separate corporations from their money.
Robert Samuelson, as you know, one of my uh sometimes favorite columnists.
Uh Washington Post and Newsweek.
The welfare state's death spiral.
Here's the pull quote.
The welfare state's death spiral is this.
Almost anything governments might do with their budgets threatens to make matters worse by slowing the economy or triggering a recession.
By allowing deficits to balloon, they risk a financial crisis as investors one day, nobody knows when, doubt the government's ability To service their debts, and as with Greece, refuse to lend except at exorbitant rates.
Cutting welfare benefits or raising taxes all would, at least temporarily, weaken the economy.
Perversely, that would make paying the remaining benefits harder.
So we are in a death spiral here.
No matter what we do, we make it worse.
That's how bad it is.
That's where Greece is.
And you have to be, you have to be a little surprised that a lot of people in this country, even liberal Democrats, cannot look at Greece and see our future there.
But apparently, the golden goose, the golden goose to this regime is now the government and its printing press.
And its ability to borrow.
That's the golden goose.
Not the private sector where growth and productivity create revenue.
No.
The government has now become the golden goose.
Look, folks, it's this simple with Elena Kagan.
If the if the regime really thought she was open-minded, if they really thought that she was sympathetic to conservatives and their point of view, if they really thought she might move the court to the right, given her lack of legal writing, they would never allow her to be nominated, much less confirmed.
So all of this about consensus builder might move the court to the right, sympathetic to consensus.
It's all a crock.
If they had the slightest doubt about this woman's far-left credentials, she wouldn't have been nominated.
They don't care that she has no writings.
They don't care that she has no qualifications.
They don't care that she is not experienced in enough ways.
They don't care, all they care about is that she's got she's Obama.
She says they said a mirror image.
She's an Obamatron.
Mirror image of Obama and his politics.
Now, with this administration, you have to keep an eye on other things that they are up to.
Like the EPA, cap and trade.
This bunch is duplicitous and they are aggressive, and they are messing with everybody's money.
They are, folks, this is this is Greece.
This business is about Greece.
It really isn't about Greece.
It's about liberalism and it's about liberals.
I got a news report here from Bloomberg EU prepped $645 billion fund to fight Wolfpack and the debt crisis.
No, no, no.
What this is is a news report on the failure of liberalism.
Yet that is not mentioned at all in this story.
Until the world comes to grips with the exact nature of the problem, nothing will be solved beyond a short-term bailout of public sector leeches, who are themselves equally to blame for this mess in Greece, who will at some point continue sucking the life out of those who actually produce something.
Except they don't look at it that way.
They don't see the people actually producing things that they're sucking dry.
They simply see the government as the golden goose.
That's where all the money is, and they just want their share of it.
These are loans that are not secured.
It is you and me making these loans to the EU, not the EU making loans to Greece.
Now, folks, just as global warming was never an environmental story.
It was a it was a story about liberals lying in order to seize power.
Greece is not a business story.
Well, I mean, it's a business story, but but like global warming, Greece is most importantly a political story with political lessons to be learned.
Think of liberals like this.
Think of them as spendthrifts with other people's money.
What ought to be a proverb, a proverb, if if it isn't already is never lend to spendthrifts.
Liberals run Greece.
Ergo, never lend money to the liberals running Greece.
They're the ones that have gotten in trouble.
You are simply kicking the can down the road and enaling, enabling the public leeches, and we have our share of them here too, the public leeches to continue to suck dry any legitimate uh source of revenue, any legitimate source of productivity.
The loans that the U extends to Greece are not going to be paid back as long as Greece's political power structure remains what it is.
When somebody explain to me how in the world they're ever going to pay this back, they're in their own death spiral.
You see the austerity programs, the riots that are caused because the leeches.
They think that they've been promised a good life without having to work hard.
That that's and they voted for these people to continue this, and now all of a sudden people are going to institute austerity program.
No, no, no, no.
Maybe you institute austerity for my neighbor, but not for me.
So forget promises, forget loan agreements.
There is there's no banker that would loan money this way unless they were commanded to, who would still have a job at a bank.
This is a bottomless pit.
Nothing is real.
Nobody has any money.
The Germans are in this mess now too.
I mean, they're Angela Merkel just lost a little election in certain part of Germany.
She's she's got a mess because they're in the same situation, and they're trying to act like the big guy that's uh gonna be loaning the money when they don't have any either, to speak of.
What what are the what are the chances that California will emerge from its de facto bankruptcy and defuse its pension time bombs?
It's not a business question.
What are the where is California going to come up with half a trillion dollars simply to make their pensions solvent for the public employees and the state teachers?
Where are they gonna get the money?
This this this question can be answered not business wise, it can be answered with a political question.
What are the chances political principled conservatives will quickly come to power in the state legislature and governor's office?
That would be the solution.
What are the odds of that happening in California?
If they're less than 50-50, you have your answer.
It doesn't matter.
It's not a business question, it's a political question.
The people who have caused the problem, if they stay in power, there's no chance it's gonna improve.
There's no chance it's gonna get better.
Ditto Greece, ditto Washington, ditto New York, ditto Albany, if the people who cause the problem are people who think like them stay in power, you can forget it.
You can have all the financial tables you want, and you can look at all of the loan rates and all the uh all of these uh, you know, all the minutiae in the world involving this, but it's political.
It's ideological.
And if the same people who cause the mess stay in power, then no solution.
It's very simple.
California is screwed if liberals are left in charge.
Greece has no hope if the socialists continue to run it.
Ditto the UK, ditto Spain, ditto Portugal, ditto us.
Ditto the United States of America.
A trick question for you.
Will the financial crisis in Greece spread to the United States?
That's right, HR.
I'm always excited when the staff actually listens to the show.
It's already here.
The crisis in Greece is already here.
It is called liberalism.
It is called socialism.
It's not, it's not somebody's irresponsible business acumen.
It's liberalism, it is political.
Liberalism, socialism is guaranteed to destroy the creation of wealth.
And we see it happening all around us.
We don't have to wait for dominoes to fall because anybody with a brain understands the United States is going bankrupt right now on its own.
Greece is a wake-up call to move faster to limit the damage it's already underway.
Now, had Obama, and I know this is a myth, is dreaming it ain't gonna happen, but just to make the point.
Had Obama cut taxes, cut spending when he came into office.
Greece wouldn't be so scary to U.S. investors.
But we're broke.
We have no margin of error here.
We miss one more paycheck and we're evicted.
That kind of no margin for error.
The parents won't lend us any more money, and the credit cards are maxed out.
Remember when Newsweek had that, and by the way, Newsweek on the market for sale lost $8 million after a revamp to make it more relevant to the average American.
They don't have a clue at Newsweek who average Americans are.
So Newsweek is for sale.
They lost $28 million.
Their most famous cover story in the past 12 months, we're all socialists now.
They should have retitled it.
We're all Greeks now.
And who's been running Newsweek?
Liberals.
It's content, content, content.
They can have all the financial gurus they want in the front office.
They can have all the savvy investors trying to make out as much as they invest whatever they get from the advertising revenue and so forth.
But they've got a political problem.
They're all liberals.
And liberalism simply kills the golden goose by definition.
It can't do anything else.
Times next.
New York Times already on that road.
Hello, LA.
Well, you've seen the stories about all of these newspapers that are losing money and losing advertising and losing readers and so forth.
Liberalism.
Not poor business decisions.
Liberalism, content, not just the content of the paper, but the thinking of the people who run the damn place.
So you know what's going to happen at Newsweek?
I guarantee what's going to happen at Newsweek is some billionaire who can afford to lose $28 million a year to pad his ego is going to come in and buy the thing and turn it into his own personal journal of opinion.
That's what's going to happen.
Well, I'm, you know, I'm not I don't have $28 million to lose, snurdly.
This is the point.
No.
Nope.
Nobody is going to make money with Newsweek.
That's the point.
They're liberals.
Nobody's going to make money with it.
And they've sold their wild oats.
They prayed for crop failure, but they got it anyway.
I have Newsweek is old.
It's old fashioned.
That's not the future.
Newsweek.
You know, when this program started, folks, a little inside baseball business.
When this radio program started, its national syndication in August of 1988.
Hardly anybody thought it would work, and it was not because of me.
They just didn't think that syndicated radio would work other than at nighttime.
Because everybody had to be local, local, local issues, phone numbers, topics, you name it.
But still, there were some general managers of powerful radio stations in the top 10 market that were worried.
They offered to buy the program.
They offered to pay us whatever we wanted for it and never run it.
To put it on the shelf.
That's what somebody's going to do with Newsweek.
That oh yeah.
If I snurdly, if I told you the name, you wouldn't believe well, you probably would believe it.
There were there were three of them actually.
They were just, it was, it was a business decision.
It was, you know, pay us the money to keep us out of the market and to keep us from becoming a problem if we succeeded.
So you buy it to shelve it.
So somebody essentially is going to do the same thing with Newsweek.
They're going to buy it and either shelve it or they're going to turn it into some propaganda arm for whatever cause they believe in and get their cocktail party invitations and get their accolades from their small little group of elite liberals, and it'd be even a badge of honor to lose money with it.
Liberals, I don't care where you go, folks.
If liberals are in charge of it, with the rare exception of Goldman Sachs, it's in trouble.
So will Greece hurt the U.S. economy?
Yeah, but so will cap and trade.
So is Obama hurting our economy.
So is the Health Care Reform Act.
Everything that they're doing is hurting the economy.
And Greece, sooner or later will too, because they're never going to be able to pay back what we're lending them.
And they're unsecured.
There's no collateral.
As long as liberals are running Greece, there is a 100% chance that Greece will default on these loans.
Don't doubt me.
As long as liberals are running California, there is a 100% chance they will go under.
Ditto, the United States at large.
The business climate around the world has been polluted with a political contagion known as liberalism or socialism, statism, whatever you want to call it.
Budgets will never be fixed.
Loans will never be repaid, and nobody cares.
Because by the their thinking is by the time it all comes due, they're out of office, they will not pay the consequences, and they're going to skim enough off the top of all this to live really luxurious lives until the dam breaks.
Financial stability will never be achieved as long as liberals are in charge because they lie and they can't stop spending other people's money even when other people have no more money.
They just print it.
Never lend to a spendthrift.
Welcome back, Rush Limbaugh.
Cutting edge societal evolution.
Let's go to the phones.
Heron Lake.
And I must admit, I did not know there were lakes in New Mexico, but here's a guy that lives on one.
Dave, great to have you on the program.
Hi.
Good day.
Yeah, I wanted to bring up the subject of Utah.
They threw out Bennett and the uh primary.
Yep.
Is this uh an ongoing thing that uh let's say Schumer, Waxman, or McCain better start thinking about.
It's not a Democrat thing or Republican thing.
The people are pardon upon pissed.
They're throwing all of these people that think that hands across the aisle is a thing that they should do all the time.
People want people that are gonna represent them, not tell them how things are gonna be.
Whether you're Republican or Democrat, you're gonna have to look out for your seat because people are pissed.
Yeah, thanks.
That's twice there.
Uh this is uh uh.
I know, and and this this, by the way, sh uh proves and demonstrates the power of the Tea Party, ladies and gentlemen.
Now, I'm gonna tell you something, though.
The the don't don't fall into a trap here.
The media is out there saying it's anti-incumbent, it's Republicans and it's anti, it's anti-rhino and anti-Democrat.
It is not anti-conservative.
It is anti-rhino.
Here, Bennett was a rhino.
I have evidence.
I have three sound bites and people who are shocked and ticked off that he lost.
David Brooks, E.J. Dion, and Tom Brokaw.
Tell me where we went wrong here.
Here's Brooks.
There's a damn outrage, to be honest.
I mean, there's a guy who is a very good senator, and he was a good senator for a good conservative, but a good conservative who's trying to get things done.
The Wyden Bennett bill, which he co-sponsored.
If you took the health care economists in the country, they would probably be for that bill, ideally.
Nobody liked the TARP, but we were in a complete economic meltdown in some of the.
Okay, that's another athletic.
Here's EJ.
That's enough.
We got to squeeze these all over before the break.
Here's E.J. Dion Jr. on Meet the Press.
Something's happening inside the Republican Party that I think in the long run won't be good for the Republican Party.
You just had an election in Britain.
EJ, tell me you really care about what's good for the Republican Party.
Okay, so there's E.J. Dion Jr., big liberal columnist, Washington Post, and Tom Brokaw on uh on Scarborough's show this morning on Mess NBC.
He was having a hard time getting into Republican uh meetings around the state.
He'd have to kind of knock on the door and say, Can I come please talk to your group?
When I first began to read and hear about that, I was absolutely stunned because uh no one has uh better kind of gold standard credentials as a Republican in the state of Utah.
Stop the tape with people like you.
This is not anti-incumbent.
What's happening here, Tom and E.J. and David is a conservative ascendancy.
Get ready for it.
A little interesting tidbit here about Elena Kagan, Supreme Court nominee today, from 2005 to 2008.
She was a member of the Research Advisory Council of the Goldman Sachs Global Markets Initiative.
She worked at Goldman Sachs.
Now, shouldn't that be enough to disqualify her for the hard left?
If not, why not?
Oh, I get it.
She'll simply say she was working behind enemy lines.
Like Obama wrote in his book.
We've barely scratched the surface today, folks.
▲
Export Selection