All Episodes
Previous Next
April 28, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:36
April 28, 2010, Wednesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of The Rush 24-7 Podcast.
The bit.
Well, maybe about the song too.
But the bit is what I would.
Maybe we could do them both back to back.
I don't know.
I mean, we're just starting the show.
Here the Who.
Good grief.
Everybody wants to know what's going to happen a whole three hours.
I don't even know what I'm going to start with.
Hi, folks.
How are you?
Rush Limbo.
Not complaining, not whining.
Here on the Limboy or at the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Where we serve humanity simply by showing up, telephone number 800-282-288-2, the email address, El Rushbo at EIBNet.com.
I want to know where all the stories are in the drive-by media about the violence.
About, hey, let's not encourage violence in the protests in Arizona.
Let's be civil.
I want to know where all the scrutiny from the media is on the anti-Arizona immigration law crowd.
You know, the Tea Parties were ridiculed and accused of things that they had not even done by President Clinton and President Obama.
I have a picture here.
I'm holding it in my formerly at nicotine-stained fingers of a pinata with the face of Jan Brewer, the Arizona governor on it, who, by the way, has seen a huge poll bounce ever since this law was signed in if she signed a law more on that, but you got some little kid beaten the hell out of a pinata with the face of the governor on it.
And where are all the stories of the uh violence?
That is a little kid beating up on this pinata.
Do you get this?
A bunch of Nambi Pambi ne'er do uh uh bleeding hearts are now advocating a boycott against the Arizona Diamondbacks baseball team, not only when they play at home, but when they play on the road.
Man, oh man.
The uh the the the leftists are just worked up into a tizzy about this.
And of course, San Francisco employees.
Public city employees who earn over a hundred grand a year have been told not to travel to Arizona.
They have been warned by the governor, the mayor out there, do not, you cannot, you will not go to Arizona.
Here's what I think Jan Brewer ought to do.
Jan Brewer, the governor of Arizona, should hold a press conference this afternoon.
She should explain all of the great welfare programs the city of San Francisco offers illegal aliens and the homeless and everybody else, and then she should offer to issue one-way travel vouchers on Greyhound or Amtrak to any illegal alien in Arizona who wishes to go to San Francisco.
Let that smug Gavin Newsom find the money to pay for all these limousine liberal compassion programs that they've got up there.
You want to you want to keep your city employees from going to Arizona?
Fine.
You're a sanctuary city.
I think the governor of New Arizona ought to offer one-way travel vouchers to illegal aliens who now find it just so dangerous and so horrible to live in the state of Arizona.
Last week, Governor Jan Brewer signed an immigration law that launched a national debate.
It has also temporarily at least helped her own chances of remaining Arizona's governor.
The new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of likely voters in Arizona shows that 56% now approve of the way she's doing her job.
Two weeks ago, she was at 40%.
She has had a bounce of 16% since she signed the immigration law into effect.
Now, this Rasmussen poll, this is huge.
This is speaking truth to propaganda because remember Obama and his regime govern against the will of the people.
And uh Obama got no health care bounce.
We were told by the regime's media that there was gonna be a huge bounce in Obama's polling data after he signed the health care law, but it didn't happen.
And yet, the governor of Arizona gets a 16-point bounce boost from her own people.
Her own voters, and even people who didn't vote for.
In the state of Arizona.
Barack Obama.
Uh, ladies and gentlemen.
I don't know.
He's got something in for the cops.
There's no question.
You go back to to Cambridge.
This guy's got this guy's got some problem with police officers.
Here's Obama.
Last night in a Tomwah, Iowa, Indian Hills Community College.
He held a town meeting.
During the QA, the student Julia Morales says, I was wondering what your plan was for our undocumented workers who helped establish our country.
Do you hear that question?
Julia Morales, a student at Indian Hills Community College, asks the president.
I was wondering what your plan was for our undocumented workers who helped establish our country.
What is this woman being taught?
Undocumented workers helped establish the country.
I I I didn't have that chapter in my history book.
Uh in junior high or high school.
I don't even I don't even what in the world has this poor student been taught?
Undocumented workers built and established the United States.
Of course, it's a kind of question the regime loves.
Here is Obama's answer.
This law that just passed in Arizona, which I think is a poorly conceived law.
You can imagine if you are a Hispanic American in Arizona.
Your great grandparents may have been there before Arizona was even a state.
But now suddenly, if you don't have your papers and you took your kid out to get ice cream, you're gonna be harassed.
That's something that could potentially happen.
That's not the right way to go.
He hasn't, he hasn't read the bill.
He obviously hasn't read the bill.
So now people have a more of a right to be there because they were there before Arizona was even a state.
So that's his argument to create a phony hypothetical where families getting ice cream are hassled by stupid, bigoted policemen.
This is going to require a massive tequila summit before this is all over.
We had a beer summit up in Cambridge.
So Obama's now not satisfied with just attacking a state.
He has to attack their police as well.
I'll tell you what's poorly conceived here is Obama's views on the cops.
I think all these cops are going to act stupidly.
This is an outrageous answer.
This is an outrageous thing.
The president of the United States.
Here, listen to this again.
First, the question.
The question is absolutely baseless and ignorant.
What is your plan, Mr. President, for our undocumented workers who helped establish our country?
This law that just passed in Arizona, which I think is a poorly conceived law.
You can imagine if you are a Hispanic American in Arizona.
Your great-grandparents may have been there before Arizona was even a state.
But now suddenly, if you don't have your papers and you took your kid out to get ice cream, you're going to be harassed.
That's something that could potentially happen.
That's not the right way to go.
Oh, not the right way to go.
Your great grandparents may have been in Arizona before Arizona was even a state, but now suddenly, if you don't have your papers, and you took your kid out to get ice cream, you're gonna get harassed.
So, once again, this is a this is a shot.
Make no mistake about it.
Uh, ladies and gentlemen, at the cops.
Byron York today has an opinion piece that is excellent in the DC examiner, and it's a takeoff, it's a reaction to a Michael Gerson column that I think yes, ran in the Washington Post.
Here's Byron York.
In the Washington Post, columnist and former Bush speechwriter Michael Gerson pronounces the new Arizona immigration law understandable and dreadful.
Gerson says states do not have the authority to take control of American immigration policy, an authority that Arizona has seized in order to abuse.
The effect of the new law, he argues will be bad for everybody.
Here's a pull quote.
It makes it harder for illegal immigrants to live without scrutiny.
name.
It makes it harder for illegal immigrants to live without scrutiny, but it also makes it harder for some American citizens to live without suspicion and humiliation.
Americans are not accustomed to the command your papers, please.
However politely delivered, the distinctly American response to such a request would be go to hell and then see you in court, which leads to the question.
What America is Michael Gerson living in?
No, we're not confronted by actors with heavy German accents demanding our papers.
We are instead confronted routinely by people of all stripes asking to see our driver's license.
When we board an airplane, we are asked to produce a government-issued photo ID, usually a driver's license.
When we make some credit or debit card purchases at department stores, we are asked to produce a driver's license.
When we enter many office buildings, both private and government, security guards often ask us to produce a driver's license.
When we go to doctors' offices and hospitals, we are asked to produce a driver's license.
When we check into hotels, we are asked to produce a driver's license.
When we purchase some over-the-counter drugs, we are asked to produce a driver's license.
If we go to a bar or nightclub, anyone who looks at all young is asked to produce a driver's license.
Needless to say, if we have any encounter with the police or other authorities, we are asked to produce a driver's license.
Some situations involve an even higher level of scrutiny.
When we get a new job, we are asked to provide not a driver's license, but a passport or birth certificate to prove citizenship.
In other situations, too.
When I renewed my DC driver's license last year, I had to produce a passport to prove citizenship, even though it was a valid unexpired license I was renewing.
And in many places, buying a gun involves enormous scrutiny.
And by the way, I can personally attest to this driver's license business.
I had to go get mine renewed.
There were three forms of documentation required.
A tax return, a passport, I forget what the other one was, and without all three, you didn't get your renewal.
Even though mine had not expired, my picture was on the expiring license.
It was a level of scrutiny I have never faced in getting a driver's license before.
Well, yeah, I was upset by it.
Of course I was upset by it.
I tried because it was silly.
And yet it was there.
Has Michael Gerson never experienced any of these situations?
And by the way, has he read the Arizona law?
Does he know that it specifically states that in any encounter with the cops, when a person produces a valid Arizona driver's license, that person is immediately presumed to be in the country legally?
Given all the situations listed above, can anybody argue that being asked to produce a driver's license, if one's in some sort of encounter with the cops in which the cops are acting lawfully, which is also specified by the new law.
Is that overly burdensome?
Being asked to produce ID is a burden that falls on everybody.
And now all of a sudden it's racist.
It is racist to ask people who may be here illegally to prove that they are here legally.
We have to produce a lot of this identification, by the way, especially when we get a job because of illegal aliens.
Can I be clear about this?
You go apply for a job, you have to prove that you're a citizen.
Because of the influx of illegals.
We aren't used to being asked for our papers.
Our papers, please.
About the only time we aren't asked for identification, my friends, I've gone through everything Byron York said here, I agree with it.
About the only time we're not asked for ID is when we vote.
We are asked for our papers.
We are asked to prove who we are constantly, multiple times a day.
And yet somehow it is racist to do this in Arizona.
And the President of the United States may move to undo the immigration law.
This is how the regime does things.
Quick time out.
Back after this, and a reminder, we've only just begun.
Okay, I'm gonna play this question to sound bite again because it just I don't know.
The whole it is infuriating the use of the word papers.
I mean, Obama understandably, why Gerson, former Bush speechwriters falling into this trap.
This is a this is a George Lackoff rhymes with situation.
Papers equals Nazi.
You're a paperist, please.
It equals Nazi.
That's why Obama's using the term.
I can understand Obama being touchy on the subject of producing your papers.
Maybe he's afraid somebody's gonna ask him for his.
So here's the question.
I was wondering what your plan was, Mr. Regime Leader for our undocumented workers who help this dadly sound country.
This law that just passed in Arizona, which I think is a poorly conceived law.
You can imagine if you are a Hispanic American in Arizona, your great grandparents may have been there before Arizona was even a state.
Yeah, yeah.
But now suddenly if you don't have your papers and you took your kid out to get ice cream, you're gonna be harassed.
That's something that could potentially happen.
I that's not the right way to go.
Right.
Well, you know, I have friends who have great great grandparents who were in England before England had any laws about immigration.
And my friends say, Can I live in England and enjoy their services because my great great grandparents were there before there were immigration laws?
Get this.
Try this.
So we have illegal aliens here who we can't ask them for their papers, like every other citizen has to prove ID.
We can't ask them.
The Jews, however, have to stop building in Jerusalem when they were there thousands of years before there was a Muslim religion or a Christian religion.
So by Obama's own logic.
By Obama's own logic.
He trips himself up.
Anyone whose great grandparents were in Arizona before it was a state has a right to walk on in there.
And yet the Jews were there before any other religion thousands of years ago in Jerusalem.
And Obama wants to deny them the right to do it's just this is it it it's dangerous what's happening here, uh, ladies and gentlemen.
That this use of the word papers is uh not by not by accident.
Here he said some more in answer to this student.
This is such a volatile issue.
I will bring the majority of Democrats to the table in getting this done.
But I've got to have some help from the other side.
I've got to have some help from the other side because we're not gonna solve this problem.
It can be exploited for political purposes, and the only way to rise above the politics and actually solve the problem once and for all is to make sure that it's a bipartisan effort, and that's what we're pushing for.
I hope that we can get it done sometime soon.
And I'm gonna continue to advocate on behalf of finally fixing the system so that we don't have either the kind of bad laws that we've seen in Arizona or alternatively, we've got half a million illegal folks coming into Arizona without any control.
Well, what the hell's happening now?
Bad laws that we've seen in Arizona.
He can't get amnesty without bipartisanship.
Why can't you just jam it down our throats like you did health care?
Why can't you just overrule Arizona?
Why can't you just, as a leader of the regime, tell them that their law no longer stands?
And by the way, the D.C. examiner White House correspondent, headline Obama may move to undo Arizona immigration law.
Arizona's tough new laws may prompt the White House to intervene, potentially igniting a divisive election year battle.
Uh Obama has spoken in favor of a comprehensive immigration plan, but so far has put forth no policy guidelines or proposals, hoping instead that Congress would take the lead as in the early days of health care reform.
But pressure From immigration reform advocates and the seriousness of Arizona's new law may force Obama to act.
Attorney General Eric Holder said the Justice Department may pursue legal action, he said, I am very concerned about the wedge that the new law could drive between communities that law enforcement's supposed to serve and those of us in law enforcement.
Now, Eric Holder and Barack Obama don't give a damn about the new Black Panthers intimidating voters and violating their civil rights in Philadelphia.
They got off scot-free thanks to Eric Holder.
Now, when it comes to civil rights violations, what do we call voter intimidation, which was caught on tape?
Obama and Holder have no standing or credibility when it comes to civil rights at all, especially after that.
They have ignored stonewalled investigations and inquiries about the new black panthers who were caught on tape violating American citizens' civil rights at the voting booth.
It's absurd to listen to these two people talk about civil rights and Arizona's immigration law.
And then demanding or suggesting that we uh overturn it from the highest levels of the regime.
So basically what we have here.
We have a federal government that refuses to enforce federal immigration law.
We have a state that is enforcing federal immigration law.
You know what the president ought to say?
He is saying you know, look, even though I took an oath to uphold the Constitution and the law of the land, I'm not going to.
Because that's what he's doing.
Just come out, Mr. President, be truthful.
You did take an oath to uphold the Constitution and the law of the land, but you're not.
So just tell people that you don't care a whit about the citizens of Arizona or the people in any of the border states.
Welcome back, Rush Linboy here on the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
Great to have you here.
Telephone number 800-282-2882.
Let me tell you what's really going on with all of this.
As always, with the left and with the regime, you have to look beneath the surface.
You've heard the old story about a duck looks like it's so smooth, gliding across the water, but underneath the ducks going nuts, paddling furiously to get where it's going.
So why?
Why this furious reaction to the Arizona immigration law?
I'll tell you why.
That's why I am here, and you are there.
The left, the Democrats, Obama, Republicans, Recognize that this notion of proving one's identity is a lethal blow to their agenda.
You know how, Snerdley.
Exactly right.
It regards the vote.
Illegal voting, illegal voters is the only hope the Democrats have of retaining power.
Why do you think this push, all of a sudden leapfrogging immigration, overcap and trade, or whatever else?
They're even admitting Dingy Harry needs to jack up his uh his Hispanic voter base out in Nevada.
They don't really intend to pass anything right now because it would rip the country apart.
They just want the Democrats and the Hispanic population to think they're working on it.
You see, the Democrats are betting everything on their ability to maintain vote fraud.
Ask John Fund about this.
Read anything John Fund has written about this.
Democrat vote fraud in the Wall Street Journal.
That's why they are having a conniption fit over this law in Arizona.
The Democrats know that their agenda would barely garner 30% of the vote if it were public.
If they were honest from top to bottom about what they intend to do, Obama himself would barely have gotten 30% of the vote.
They can see the polling data.
They know the vast majority of this country's center right.
They know that on issue after issue after issue, Obama is losing.
A vast majority of Americans disapprove of agenda item after Agenda item.
They know they cannot win in policy debates.
They cannot win in the arena of ideas.
They must use thuggery.
As they did in health care, bribes or what have you.
I'm telling you, my friends, this whole notion of opposing this racist bigotry in Arizona is based simply on one thing.
The fact that having to prove your identity is a lethal blow to their agenda.
As I may mention in the first half hour of this program, the only place you don't have to prove uh ID is when you vote.
You have to show a voter registration card where I vote.
But the Democrats have fought every state.
Efforts to produce photo ID to vote, to prove that you are registered, to prove that you were a citizen.
They have fought it, and this is why.
And if this Arizona law stands, and there is a there's a representative in the state of Texas, a member of their legislature who wants to adopt this law now.
A Republican Texas lawmaker plans to introduce a tough immigration measure similar to the new law in Arizona.
A move state Democrats say would be a mistake.
Representative Debbie Riddle of Tomball said she'll push for the law in the January legislative session, according to the San Antonio Express News and Houston Chronicle.
She said the first priority for any elected official is to make sure the safety and security of Texans is well established.
Amen.
It's also the first responsibility of the federal government.
They have rejected that responsibility.
That's why Arizona has acted.
So make no mistake.
What this is really all about.
They have been trying to demonize and even criminalize providing your ID, especially when you vote.
They cannot win without vote fraud.
They cannot win without illegals voting.
They cannot win unless they round up a bunch of people in buses, provided by unions or whoever, and put people on board those buses who have no idea where they're going while they're in route, they're told what to do when they get where they get there, and then they do it and they take them back home.
Very simple.
Very, very simple.
Where is President Obama reaching out to the people who oppose amnesty?
How is he trying to listen to them?
This was going to be a transparent administration.
He was going to unify us.
He was going to bring us all together.
Instead, he's throwing the race card out there.
He's dividing us by race and ethnicity.
Where is the empathy for the people who oppose amnesty?
At the very least, isn't the Arizona immigration law what they always say a desperate cry for help?
It's a desperate cry for help.
Obama is known to have only worked on two cases as a lawyer.
Redlining, in the case of loans, as a precursor to the subprime mortgage business, and the motor voter bill.
Those are the two cases that Obama as a lawyer has worked on.
Make no mistake, the Democrats know that you are not them.
They know that they do not reflect a majority of the thinking in this country.
They know they have to govern against you.
They have to govern against the will of the people.
They know that you know that the way they're doing things is not the way things get done in this country.
They know that if producing your papers, when it comes time to vote, ever happens in one state, then they have a big, big problem.
They're betting everything in their future on their ability to maintain vote fraud.
Let's go to the audio sound bites.
This whole produce your papers thing.
Nazi.
Lack off.
So last Friday, Saturday, Sunday, Monday, we have a montage of all kinds of media people talking about this.
Critics have said that it's akin to the Nazis in terms of demanding people's papers.
The party of show me your papers.
The show us your papers act.
Show us your papers.
Papers, please.
Stop and show us your papers.
Let's see your papers.
To show papers, we're walking up to people and say, Let me see your papers.
This very much smells of may I see your papers apocryphal regimes where the police are always saying, hand over your papers.
let me see your papers environment.
Can he stop the car and say, let's see your papers?
Can you say papers, please?
Can we all agree that there's nothing more Nazi than saying, show me your papers?
There you have it.
So now the Arizona legislature, the governor, have a bunch of Nazis.
Michael Gerson, Washington Post, former speechwriter, George W. Bush, write in on the action referring to all of this as Nazi-like.
Produce your papers.
In the meantime, let me ask you something, folks.
What really is more Nazi-like?
Is it more Nazi-like to produce your ID when you check into a hotel or cash a check or what have you?
Or when you take over two automobile country companies, which is more Nazi-like.
What is more Nazi like, demanding that you prove that you are a legal citizen if you are in a situation where you may have committed a crime?
Or is it more Nazi-like to commandeer and take over one sixth of the U.S. private sector and run health care from the headquarters of the regime?
Which is more Nazi like?
What is more Nazi like?
Asking people for IDs when they get on airplanes, buy an airplane ticket, or what have you, or cash a check.
Or when American businesses follow the law and say, you know what, you just passed the health care bill.
I gotta take a one million dollar charge of my bottom line according to the law, and then Henry Waxman sends you essentially a subpoena and says, you can't embarrass our president like that.
Everybody knows this health care bill is going to reduce costs.
You bring yourself up here, you bring your papers, you bring your emails, and you bring your books.
What is more Nazi like than the regime coming after you even after you've obeyed the law?
And all of a sudden, and there you will not find produce your papers anywhere in the law.
It has been totally created, been picked up by government-run media, and now that's Nazi-like.
My friends, this regime in its day-to-day actions, is far more Nazi-like than any identification law that is enforced anywhere in this country.
Let me ask you something.
If you're in California, if you're New York and Florida, if you're driving around anywhere in this country and you are pulled over, and you can't produce documentation if you don't have a driver's license, what happens to you?
Well, not necessarily jail, but you get a ticket.
You get cited.
If you have an expired license, if you don't have any idea, if you can't prove that the car is yours, what happens to you?
What's different about this than anything happening in Arizona?
Not a damn thing.
These people, folks, you know, you try going to Mexico without proper documentation.
You try moving to Mexico.
You will you want to f you want to find some tough immigration law?
You want to talk about violation of civil rights.
Try moving to Mexico and find out what you can't do when you get there.
Funny how the left um only mentions the Nazis asking for papers.
In the Soviet Union, if you move to another town, why you had to go to the local police and give them your papers just to move from one town to another.
Anyone ever heard of the Brandenburg Gate?
Anyone ever heard of the Berlin Wall?
Anyone ever heard the Soviet communists were far more frequently using produce your papers, please, than even the Nazis.
And of course, the American left idolized the Soviet Union.
The American left dreams of its rebirth to this day in this country.
The Soviet Union popularized this whole notion of...
Produce your papers.
Their ID requirements in the Soviet Union, far more extreme in times of peace than the Nazis were at the height of war.
Don't doubt me.
Now these idiot boycotts.
bleeding heart.
Not immersed in reality at all, sports writers and whoever else now suggesting the Arizona diamondbacks be boycotted.
At home and on the road.
From the New York Daily News, Arizona ice tea has been boycotted.
The left in this country is urging a boycott of Arizona ice tea.
The only problem is it's made in New York.
Arizona ice tea is actually brewed in New York.
Opponents of Arizona's new anti-immigrant law calling for a boycott of Arizona's products, including Arizona iced tea.
His typical letter, Dear Arizona, if you don't change your immigration policy, I'm gonna have to stop drinking your enjoyable brand of iced tea, twittered Jody Beth in Los Angeles.
It's the drink of fascists, wrote Travis Nichols in Chicago.
Founded in Brooklyn in 1992, the firm is based in Queens before moving into a new 35 million dollar headquarters in Nassau County out on Long Island last year.
Arizona iced tea is not made in Arizona, and yet these idiots are boycotting.
So here.
Again, where are we?
Where are we?
We have a federal government that refuses to enforce federal immigration law and a state that is.
The president ought to just come out and say, right now, look, even though I took an oath to uphold the Constitution and the law of the land, I'm not going to.
I don't give a damn about the people of Arizona or the people in any of the border states.
I don't give a damn about the people of this country generally.
I'm on a worldwide stage now.
My number one job is to impress other governments and other people, not to look out for the best interests of the American people.
This is what Obama ought to say, because this is what he's doing.
He can also say this.
He hadn't done a press conference in a long time, but he'd call a national address to the nation to help quell all of this unrest.
And President Obama could honestly say to the people of this country, I can bully, I can smear, I can abuse the citizens of this country by going overseas and denouncing them, their parents and their grandparents, calling them imperialists in essence, capitalist pigs in essence.
I can pass laws that force American citizens to do what I tell them to do, whether they like it or not, such as this insurance mandate, which is wholly unconstitutional.
I can raise your taxes as much as I want.
I can deny you energy to heat your home and run your car.
I can tell you what to eat.
I can kick Americans to the curb or make them wards of the state.
I, Barack Obama, in 16 short months, have done that and more.
But when it actually comes to protecting you from alien criminals, protecting you from aliens from coming into your town and state by the millions who use your services and who are here illegally, well, I'm gonna side with the illegal aliens every time.
I, President Obama, think the cops are stupid.
I am going to oppose cops every chance I get.
I am going to side with illegal aliens every time.
In fact, what President Obama is doing, if you want to get down to brass tacks here, is siding against Americans.
And this is the argument we need to universalize.
I'm telling you, from the health care bill to whatever other piece of legislation he has planned or has passed, TARP, stimulus, Barack Obama is siding against Americans.
I think it's a better way of saying he's governing against the will of the people.
Barack Obama is siding against us.
He does not stand up for the law-abiding citizens of this country.
He does not stand up for the legal immigrants in this country.
He goes To bat for the illegals, the malcontents, the lawbreakers, because it is their votes he needs.
And he can't get those votes if we ever get to a point where voter photo ID is required at the polling place.
That's what's undergirding all this.
Look at the war on terrorism, my friends.
Obama and his attorney general have spent months trying to ensure that terrorists receive constitutional rights.
No president before has ever conferred on this kind of an enemy.
It's suicidal, but he does it.
He doesn't care about the American citizen.
He doesn't care about the dire consequences of his actions.
He is reckless.
He borders on lawless.
Here's the thing the people of Arizona and their state government are not acting in a radical way.
The president and his regime are.
The radicals in this argument are the pro-amnesty, pro-illegal alien people.
The Democrat Party, the government-run media, and everybody in this regime, the people of Arizona are the epitome of reasonable.
They are the epitome of controlled, but at their wit's end.
The president and his administration and his regime, they are the radicals.
Back after this.
When a president, by his actions and words, makes clear that he is not going to protect the citizens of a state, it is the duty of that state to step up and protect its citizens when the president of the country refuses to do so.
▲
Export Selection