All Episodes
Previous Next
April 26, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:24
April 26, 2010, Monday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Well, well, well, well, well, look at this.
Uh this is from my foxphoenix.com.
Refried beans found smeared on Arizona Capitol windows.
The conflict over a sweeping crackdown on illegal immigration in Arizona intensified today.
As vandals smeared refried beans in the shape of swastikas on the state capitol's windows.
Now, this is getting out of hand, ladies and gentlemen.
The president of the United States needs to put a stop to this.
The president of the United States was out there talking about how all of this unfairness, potential civil rights violations are taking place in uh in in Arizona, and he's gotta stop this.
Uh let's see.
Let's see.
I can't find what sound bite it is.
At any rate, um I asked it a question earlier about it.
I just got this free-fried beans story.
Hang in here with me.
Oh, yeah.
Yep, number seven.
Grab audio soundbite number seven.
I had sound bites 32 and number 33 in front of seven, which screwed me up.
There's got to be a better way of doing this.
There has to be a better way of having 15,000 pieces of paper on my desk.
I don't know what it is, but there has to be.
Here's audio soundbite number seven.
Efforts in Arizona, which threaten to undermine basic notions of fairness that we cherish as Americans, as well as the trust between police and their communities that is so crucial to keeping us safe.
In fact, I've instructed members of my administration to closely monitor the situation and examine the civil rights and other implications of this legislation.
Stop the tape, that's all we need to hear.
So here's the president of the United States last Friday.
Efforts in Arizona which threaten to undermine basic notions of fairness that we cherish as Americans, as well as the trust between the cops and their communities that it's so crucial to keeping us safe.
Uh I think the president there is blasting Arizona for simply trying to enforce the law.
The federal law, as well as now a new state law, and shortly afterwards, doesn't take a couple days, but here come some refried beans smeared on state capitol windows in the shape of swastikas, and I don't think the Tea Party did it.
Do you, snertly?
Don't think the Tea Party did.
I wasn't in Arizona over the weekend.
I hadn't talked to anybody in Arizona over the weekend.
I mean, who could be responsible for this?
Obviously the people that smeared the refried beans aren't responsible, because in the Clinton Obama world, you who do what you do are not responsible.
Only people who talk to you are responsible for motivating you.
Well, here's the president ginning up a bunch of hate in Arizona over a legal piece of legislation.
Refried beans found smeared.
Arizona Capit windows.
Hi, folks.
In case you don't know, I'm Rush Linball.
Telephone numbers 800 282-2882 and the email address lrushball at EIB net.com.
There were other protests over the weekend.
Uh demonstrators throwing bottles and other things at the cops.
Uh very violent.
CNN, though, and the rest of the media describe the protests as peaceful, unlike the vicious protests of the Tea Party people.
People throwing rockets, bottles, so forth, smearing re-fried beans on State Capitol windows peaceful protest.
Now, it's a very simple question, folks.
Isn't protecting our legal citizens from an invading army of illegal aliens who were using our services and taking our jobs?
Isn't that a basic notion of fairness?
Isn't that in the Constitution?
Where is the fairness to American citizens here?
Where is it being implied?
How come the fairness here is being denied by American citizens?
Fairness is a casualty because of the behavior of American citizens.
What about the basic fairness of state and federal governments to protect the American citizens?
So it looks to me like it looks to me like what's going on in Arizona, and it's not the first time.
There is an effort to criminalize enforcing law.
And leading this effort is Barack Hussein Obama.
Leading the effort to criminalize the enforcement of the law.
And Sleece, like on 9-11, Obama seems to only have empathy here for the perps.
He doesn't have any empathy or sympathy for the American people in Arizona, for American citizens.
Oh, we're going to look into this.
We're going to find out how this is violating civil rights.
We're going to look into this, violating a basic tenets of fairness that we in America all know.
That's what we're going to do.
We're going to look into this.
And Obama says he's going to reconnect via immigration bill.
Young people, African Americans, Latinos, and women for 2010 to help stem the tide of Democrat losses in November.
He did not say he was going to reach out to white people.
He didn't say he was going to reach out to white women.
He didn't say he was going to reach out to white seasoned citizens.
In fact, he didn't say white people at any time.
Nope.
Reconnect with young people, African Americans, Latinos, and women for 2010.
And he left out the Asians.
He left out the Asians.
I don't know how they feel about that, but he left out the Native Americans.
Didn't mention them either.
So Guy clearly finds it without the teleprompter troublesome.
He ends up discriminating against groups when he doesn't have the teleprompter to cover them all.
And we mentioned earlier that guess what?
Health care premiums and costs are going to skyrocket.
From the American Spectator Crowler, the economic report released last week by Health and Human Services, which indicated that Obama's health care reform law would actually increase the cost of health care and impose higher costs on consumers,
had been submitted to the Office of Kathleen Sabilis, Health and Human Services, more than a week before the congressional votes on the bill, according to career sources at the Health and Human Services Department.
Sibelius' staff refused to review the document before the vote was taken.
The reason we were given was that they didn't want to influence the vote, said a source inside HHS, which is actually the point of having a review like this.
I mean, you would think.
So everybody knew, everybody knew that Obamacare would ratchet up the cost.
That news was suppressed.
Sibelius didn't want to read it on purpose, saying she didn't want to affect the vote.
All of which is true.
She knew the vote would be, but here's the here's the problem with this now.
Well, it's a problem if the Republicans are on the game.
The problem is that there are a lot of vulnerable Democrats.
Some in the you know the Stupak coalition, others not.
There are some who said specifically they voted for Obamacare because the CBO does a lie.
We looked at the numbers, it lowers premiums, it lowers costs, and it lowers the deficits.
There's about 12 to 15, maybe more Democrats who said that.
Over and over and over again.
They are on record.
Jim Garvy, campaign spot, National Review Online, has a list of these guys and women and their quotes.
And so now their own administration, their own regime has undermined them.
As long as the Republicans are on the case and are able to go out and run very effective TV commercials with the simple truth.
Hey, they knew a week before the vote that the costs were going to skyrocket, and they didn't tell their own Democrats.
Now let me ask a question.
Getting back to amnesty for just a second here.
How does that help create and save jobs?
Because isn't that the laser-like focus of the Obama administration, creating jobs, laser-like focus?
And amnesty does that how?
Amnesty creates and saves jobs how?
A lot of people say, Rush, how come the CBO numbers are different from the Medicare actuary's numbers?
That's a good question.
And the answer is very simple.
The Medicare actuary does not have to work with the numbers that Congress gives them.
The Congressional Budget Office does.
The CBO can only use the numbers Congress gives them to score the costs.
And that's why the whole process is filled with fraud and is flawed because the numbers were cooked in order to get the favorable score in the first place.
place.
The Medicare actuary can use the real numbers.
And obviously has, and has come to the conclusion that we all knew that this is going to ratchet prices up like crazy.
It can't do anything else.
Wall Street Journal, Obamacare Mulligan.
About those lower insurance costs, we promised, oh yeah.
When Obama signed his health care reform last month, he declared it will lower costs for families and for businesses and for the federal government.
So why?
Barely a month later are Democrats scrambling to pass a new bill that would impose price controls on insurance.
Did you know they're doing this?
In a now they tell us hearings on Tuesday.
Last Tuesday, the Senate Health Committee debated a bill, a new piece of legislation that would give the states the power to reject premium increases that state regulators determine are unreasonable, just like Massachusetts has.
But they didn't do it in the first bill.
They left it out.
The White House tried to get it into the final bill, but it couldn't be included because it violated the procedural rules that the Democrats abused to pass it in the first place.
Some twenty-seven states currently have some form of rate review in the individual and small business markets, but they generally don't leverage it in a political way because insolvent insurers are expensive for states and bankruptcies limit consumer choices.
One exception, though, is Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick, who is now using his regulatory power to create de facto price controls and to sale the state's insurers as cover for the explosive costs revolting or resulting from the Obamacare prototype that Massachusetts passed in 2006, and it is a prototype, and even Obama refers to it as that.
National Democrats now want the power to do the same thing across the country because they know how unrealistic their cost control claims really are.
The Democrats are petrified they are going to get the blame that they deserve when insurance costs inevitably spike.
So the purpose of this latest Senate bill is to have a preemptive political response on hand.
Now, this study released last weekend by Richard Foster, the Obama administration's Medicare actuary actuary, Mr. Foster predicts net national health spending will increase about 1% annually above the status quo that is already estimated to be 4.7 trillion in 2019.
This is one more rebuke to the White House fantasy that a new entitlement will lower the costs.
There's not one truthful thing Obama said about his bill that will lower costs or anything else.
From the Associated Press, the AP now trying to shame the Republicans into fixing the mess that the Democrats left us with.
First story, first sentence of the story.
What's it going to cost me?
That's the single biggest unanswered question about Obama's new health care overhaul and its weak spot.
Nobody knows what it's going to cost them.
Many experts believe the law falls short on taming costs.
That'll force Congress to revisit health care in a few years.
Well, we already know that costs are going up, and that that news was hidden from members of Congress before the vote.
While it seems hard to believe now, Republicans might want to participate in a debate over costs, perhaps opening the way for limits on malpractice lawsuits and other ideas they've advocated.
Mark Warner, Democrat Virginia.
Now that the baseline question of coverage has been answered, it would be irresponsible if we didn't come back and try to do more on costs.
I think there's going to be a debate in the Republican Party on whether they should waste all their energy on repeal or make an effort to do something on cost containment.
Now see, this is a head fake, folks, because this is not about costs at all.
Zilch Zero Nada.
There are a hundred other reasons to can this whole pile of manure.
But the Democrats' procedure now, their their strategy, is to is to have us think that the Republicans have a say, that they have a role and a responsibility to make their mess smell better.
If they have to now make the bad bill good, it should never have been passed in the first place, period, which we all knew.
So now all of a sudden that they got cost problems, guess what Mark Warner wants the Republicans to come in and help fix the crisis?
Therefore, help share the blame.
It's a trick to get them to give up on this repeal notion.
And he's dangling the carrot of uh malpractice reform.
Hey, if you come back here and help us get these costs into control, why, why we'll talk to you about we'll talk to you about medical malpractice reform.
Tort reform.
How did I know the costs were going up before the bill was passed?
Uh well, oh, and it was hidden from the Democrats.
Well, it's a good question.
The good question.
In other words, if I knew the costs were going up, everybody should have known the costs were going up.
And yet the Democrats lied and acted like they believed all the CBO numbers.
This is why Democrats are Democrats, and this is why liberals are liberals.
Universe of lies, the four corners of deceit.
They were lying through their teeth snerdly when they told us costs were going to go down.
They were so was Obama.
There's no way you can add 32 million people to coverage and have costs go down.
There's no way that you can let people only opt in for insurance when they get sick or have the car wreck and then opt out of it after they've been treated and have costs go down.
There's no way, there's no federal entitlement that has ever reduced its cost or spending.
We were scammed from the get-go, led by the President of the United States.
At any rate, these are all rhetorical questions, but I deigned to answer them anyway.
Okay, let me clear something up here about the uh apparent confusion in a polling data coming out of Arizona.
And I I understand I've uh Fox uh news network is uh also confounded by this.
Uh and even uh McCaney or McCain, the uh poll says 71% of Arizonians like the new immigration law, and the second component is that 53% think it will result in some civil rights violations.
Now the people analyzing this can't get their arms around that one.
They think it's some kind of contradiction.
So they're willing to blow off the poll.
If 73% like the law, but over half of them think it'll result in some civil rights violations, then they don't really support the law.
That's the mistake they're making.
This is where people in Washington, this is where the left, this is where the Obamaites and the regime do not get it.
What the people of Arizona are saying is they know some civil rights will probably be violated along the way, but they don't care.
They want the law anywhere.
You got Hezbollah in Arizona, you've got Mexican drug cartels operating in Arizona, you've got the steady stream of illegals over the border, and you've got people being killed now in Arizona.
They are at their wit's end.
Enforcing the law is the overall thing.
And if there are some civil rights violations, so be it.
That's how desperate the situation is.
They want the law anybody.
See, not everybody thinks that civil rights are the end all and be all of every single issue.
But the folks in Washington just cannot imagine it.
Civil rights violations, oh my gosh, the worst thing we could possibly do is a civil rights book because it's code words.
It's simple code words.
Civil rights violations.
You know who that's you know who that's designed to stir up?
And who's Obama stirring up anyway?
We got to reconnect.
Young people.
African Americans, Latinos and women for 2010 in a video put out by the DNC over the weekend.
This is the regime at its racist best.
What's the regime Doing asking blacks and Latinos to join him in a fight.
What is a campaign, if not a fight?
He's asking young people, African Americans, Latinos, and women to reconnect to fight who.
Who's this fight against?
Civil rights violations in Arizona.
We got to make sure that the state of Arizona plays fair.
Who is this fight against?
If I may say something to the leader of this regime, I mean this from the uh bottom of my heart.
Uh we've never had a president like this, who has purposely come to divide people.
But he has, and he is, with that video, seeking to reconnect young people, African Americans, Latinos, and other women for 2010 against who.
Freedom has no color, Mr. President.
Freedom has no race.
Freedom is a human right granted by God.
It is not to be parceled out by arrogant eggheads like you to people who you think are more deserving of freedom than others.
Freedom ain't you.
It's not your choice, Mr. President, to determine who's free and who isn't.
We're all born that way.
So says in our Constitution, which I know you've got some problems with, but this is not the 1800s, Mr. President.
And freedom knows no race.
Hey, uh, Mr. Broadcast Engineer, keep audio soundbite number five standing by before we get to number 12 or after we get to number 12, just uh follow my lead out there.
Welcome back, Rush Limbaugh.
Half my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair.
So, back to health care for just a second, because I wasn't through making a point about this.
They passed health care reform.
The Democrats did through reconciliation.
Now that, and I want you Republicans to listen to me on this.
Passing health care reform through reconciliation was the Democrats' way of telling you in the Republican Party to go to hell, that you weren't needed, and that your opposition didn't matter, and basically you.
Now, all of a sudden, lo and behold, now that health care reform has been passed, and now that it is confirmed that it's going to cost far more than they ever promised, now all of a sudden led by Mark Warner.
The Democrats need the Republicans to be responsible.
They need the Republicans to help them out.
That's right.
The Democrats want the Republicans to be responsible in what?
Helping destroy the insurance industry by giving power to the states, like in Massachusetts, to review this.
Deval Patrick has the authority in Massachusetts to tell insurance companies, hell no, you can't raise rates.
You're going to sell at the price I tell you to.
The Senate is working on that same language as an addendum to Obamacare.
They want the states, all states, to be able to tell private insurance companies, nope, you can't raise your rates, because right now they can, and they will, because they have no choice.
So what they're asking after telling Republicans to go to hell by going to this through re reconciliation, they now are begging the Republicans to come back, be responsible, and join them in helping to keep the insurance companies from raising their rates, thus putting them out of business.
If you have to accept all these new enrollees and their prior pre-existing conditions, and you can't raise their insurance rates, then you will destroy the insurance companies, and this is what the Democrats are now asking the Republicans to do rather than repeal the bill.
It's a typical trick.
The Democrats want the Republicans to get their fingerprints on destroying the insurance industry across this country, so they can say that that was bipartisan.
In fact, before it's all said and done, it'll all have been the Republicans' fault By the time the media and the Democrats get done with this down the road.
Okay, to the phones uh that we go.
Uh Jennifer, Potomac, Maryland, I'm glad you waited.
I really appreciate your patience.
Hello, and welcome to the EIB network.
Hi, Russ.
It's such an honor to speak with you.
I appreciate you taking my call.
Thank you very much.
Um I grew up in a Latin country, and I was a missionary kid.
My husband is a legal immigrant from Guatemala.
He has worked very hard in this country.
He's a U.S. citizen now.
He's a commander in the United States Commission Corps of the Public Health Service.
He's a true patriot, and he loves this country with all his heart.
And he does not take our freedom for granted.
I homeschool my kids because I want them to be raised with uh an understanding of what it took to get this country where it is today, our freedom that we have that we do not take for granted.
And um I want my kids to have that foundation.
Um, and I also want them to understand capitalism and what it takes.
We we as citizens have given a lot to this country to get it where it is today.
We have sacrificed in a lot of ways, and put each putting in their fair share of hard work.
And um I I am offended by Obama talking about fairness, and um I my question is whose rights are really being undermined here.
I mean, you already made this point, but um this is just disgusting to me.
Is it fair that we as citizens and taxpayers have to put put foot the bill for these illegals' health health care and their ER visits?
And uh, is it fair that we have to um pay the cost of dealing with the crime caused by these illegals, um, the cost of hiring more teachers to accommodate all their children who don't speak English or who are learning it?
Um, is it fair that that millions or taxes money goes to translating every single document you can find in this country?
Um is it fair that we as citizens have to drive on the streets with illegals who can't read the signs in English and don't know traffic rules because they come from a country where those traffic rules are not enforced?
It seems to me like we as legal citizens are the ones being treated unfairly here.
You are exactly right.
You are a hundred thousand percent exactly right.
Rado, right on, right on, right on.
It's why I asked earlier isn't protecting legal citizens from an invading army of illegal aliens who are using our services and taking jobs.
Where's the basic notion of fairness for the American citizen?
Now let me say something about this, because we folks, we have to be very careful that we don't fall into a trap here.
I know a lot of people on our side of this issue.
And it's not a whole lot of them, but many of them say I don't like all this talk about these illegals.
They're just they just want a better life.
Yeah, the Somalis want a better life, and the Ugandans want a better life.
The Haitians want a better life.
Uh there's a way for them to have it, and that's to emulate us.
It's not to come here and destroy what this is for everybody else.
So the the point here is that the real focus of rage should not be on the illegals.
They are simply facilitating opportunities granted them by the Democrat Party and the American left and their own government.
Um if you are an illegal alien, you have no doubt, and you are being told by La Raza and whoever else, the Democrat Party's on your side.
The Democrat Party thinks that you ought to be able to access uh the American job market uh and all of our constitutional rights, even though you're not a citizen, and the only reason that you are not being allowed to is because they don't like the color of your skin.
And this is being led by no less than our own president of the United States.
This notion of fairness has been turned upside down, is 180 degrees out of phase.
But it's entirely understandable that people from the depths of poverty, who are only miles away from prosperity would seek to access prosperity.
What's happening is that there is a political movement and ideology and party.
Liberalism, the American left, and the Democrat Party, which sees these people for only one reason, sees them in only one way.
They are pure objects.
They are not human beings.
They are potential future voters.
They are people who will become dependent on Democrats and the government.
It is all about expanding government, creating a power base that can never ever lose.
These illegals are being exploited and used by the Democrat Party, in some cases their own governments, by sending them here.
And the American left in general, which has a big chip on its shoulder about this country anyway, and would love nothing more than for all of it to be torn down.
Jonah Goldberg had a great piece at National Review Online on Friday.
And he kicked it off by saying that Mr. Buckley, William Buckley, opened a column every five or ten years with uh a phrase that he had uh become familiar with, and he hoped that after he had died, somebody would repeat it every five years, keep it alive.
And the phrase is the problem with socialism is socialism.
The problem with capitalism is capitalists.
Now, before you think this is a criticism of capitalism, it's not.
The problem with socialism is itself.
There's nothing wrong with capitalism, except there are some people who game the system.
But in socialism, why has socialism never worked?
Because the people who run it are not socialists.
They are a full-fledged capitalist.
Go to the Soviet Union, go to China, go to Cuba.
The sons and daughters of party members do what?
They live in the nicest houses.
They have the nicest cars, they go to the nicest schools.
The people in power in socialist societies have the power to game the system for themselves.
The point is that every human being is trying to improve his own lot in life.
One way or another.
In the case of socialism and communism, it's trying to get yourself in the power structure to game the system for your own benefit.
In the case of capitalism, he said, the people that engage in capitalism and socialism are basically the same people.
In capitalism, you do it through your work.
Uh you do it through your education, you do it by accessing opportunity in the private sector.
Socialism has the same kind of people who don't want to be equal with everybody else.
Where, you know, socialism exists on this premise that we're all the same and that we're all equal, and we're going to take from those who have and redistribute to those who don't, so that everybody's going to have the same.
But it never works out.
And why not?
Because there's always a ruling class that has everything they want, forcing mediocrity, averageness on everybody else, and the people left are still trying to game the system to get out of their squalid circumstances.
So it never works.
It never can work because socialism is in direct violation of human nature.
Capitalism is not.
Capitalism embodies human nature from freedom to ambition on down the line.
Nobody has ever said unfettered capitalism.
Nobody has ever said we need an unregulated market.
The difference is, yeah, you need a you need a referee, as in the government.
But when the referee starts playing the game, then we're all cooked.
And the referee is now playing the game.
The referee's owning car companies, the referee is owning the banking business, trying to take it over, the referee is now taking over the health care business.
Just like in the socialist communist countries of China and the Soviet Union, Russia, Cuba, Venezuela, wherever.
And wherever you go and examine lifestyles in those countries, you are going to find abject misery except for the chosen few at the top.
And those who are not the chosen few are trying to game their way to get in there because they're using basic human nature.
So, no, nobody disagrees with the notion that even in capitalism, you need a referee.
But when the referee, i.e.
the government, starts playing the game, nobody else can compete.
Nobody has the money, nobody has the uh uh the power to withstand them.
So how does this relate to illegal immigration?
It's very simple.
The Democrat Party, President Obama, this regime, the American left, liberalism in general, general, wants to get done with capitalism.
They want to tear it apart, leaving the spoils only for them.
These poor people, these poor illegals, I don't care where they're from, are nothing but tools.
They're not even really human beings.
All this talk about their civil rights is that's bogus as well.
All they care about is getting these people.
In fact, right now they don't even care about making them citizens.
They just want these poor people to think that they're working on their citizenship so that they will win an election, or at least not lose as bad in November.
They don't care about people.
All this talk about how they are the tolerant ones and they are the ones with compassion.
It's bogus, just like every other sales pitch they give us about themselves.
Just about every other claim they make about themselves that's oriented toward making them look angelic and us demonic.
The people who care about people are found on the right side of the aisle in this country and throughout the world.
So look at the unrest.
Look at the angst.
Look at the chaos and the tumult.
The president of the United States himself stirred up starting Friday and Saturday by bringing this immigration bill to the fore.
And now he's talking about monitoring Arizona.
And now he's talking about reaching out to blacks, Latinos, women, and whoever else, but not whites, to recapture his campaign magic from 2008.
He, his regime, and the Democrat Party exist to divide.
And this push for amnesty for illegals is the greatest evidence of that, and it's right in front of our faces.
Just like everything they're doing now is right in front of their faces, ours.
We don't have to speculate.
We know it.
We see it, they're doing it.
So when we oppose amnesty and illegals and so forth, yeah, they come and they commit crimes.
Yeah, that they are being enabled.
They're being enabled by a political party, an ideology, and a regime, which refuses to enforce the law.
And it's now gotten so bad that instead of enforcing a law, they're accusing people who do enforce the law of human rights violation.
They are criminalizing, attempting to criminalize people in Arizona for obeying and passing a law.
Back after this.
Ha, how are you?
Welcome back.
Rush Limbaugh.
Cutting edge of societal evolution of Camarill, California.
Dave, great to have you on the program, sir.
Hey, Rush, Megadeth.
It's a great pleasure to be talking with you, and I just wanted to let you know, I don't know if you were aware of it, but uh one member of the Hillsdale College football team didn't make it into the NFL, I believe in the second or third round.
Yeah, Jared Jaredveld here, an offensive lineman, the Oakland Raiders picked him the uh, I think the first time in 30 years.
Yeah, that was a that was a goof up, and it was a goof up on the part of the staff, but I take the hit for it.
No problem.
I the reason it was uh an issue for me is that I've got uh three young sons, and the youngest is a freshman in high school.
I put them in private school because I'm a little tired of all the uh political correctness and problems with our society.
And I investigated Hillsdale's website based on your uh recommendations.
They've got an impressive history of teaching kids about our constitution.
They've sent a lot of their students into military service, and uh they've got an impressive program.
And I I really feel that we need to take a look strongly at what they put out because that information is good, solid information, and everything you've discussed on the program this morning is a problem in our society because they don't know the foundations, and we need those back.
We know to understand.
Like in the example of immigration.
We know we are the beacon of freedom in the world.
We want people to immigrate here who want to be free.
We want people to immigrate here who want to assimilate, become Americans.
We love America, we love the country, we're proud of it.
We want like-minded people here, but the Democrat Party and the American left are using this purely as a beneficial political image without one care in the world for the humanity of the people they are attempting to sponsor, or with the results that happen, with this kind of influx of people who are illegal and are not interested in assimilating.
Nobody is opposed to immigration, not one person's opposed to legal immigration.
But this is not legal, and this you know, I'm going back to this list of people who bomb says that he's gonna reach out to young people, African Americans, Latinos, and women.
He didn't mention Native Americans.
He didn't mention white people, old, young, or female.
He didn't mention Jewish people.
He didn't mention Asians.
He didn't mention Kenyans.
Well, yes, he did.
African Americans.
I tell you, take it back.
So here's a guy who's perfectly willing, along with his party, to divide this country to create the chaos and benefit from it, which is all this most recent push for amnesty is is.
That's all it is, folks.
Designed to benefit him and his party.
Whatever havoc it wreaks on our culture and society or states, he could not care less.
Yes, my friends, let's just say it the way it is.
The least experienced, the least accomplished, the most anti-capitalist pro-regulation man ever to occupy the Oval Office has lived down to his reputation.
Time and time and time again.
▲
Export Selection