All Episodes
Previous Next
April 20, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:40
April 20, 2010, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
You know who I would not want to be yesterday and today is a guy named Gray Powell.
Gray Powell is an engineer at Apple Incorporated.
Gray Powell was playing, as I'm sure many Apple people are, with the prototype of the new iPhone.
It's due out in June.
He left it in a beer bar.
Over the weekend.
It was found and it was shipped to the people at Giz Moto, which is a tech website.
They looked at it.
They took it apart.
This is the real deal.
This is a prototype of the new Apple iPhone coming in June.
It's got a front-facing camera now for video chats.
It's got all kinds of new uh features on it, was run the 4.0 software.
And they've just, we got it.
They got pictures of it, the video of the thing in operation.
Apple sent them a letter.
We understand you have an Apple device.
We want it back.
So they're going to send it back.
They're glad to send it back, but this guy left it on a bar stool.
I would not want to be this guy.
Because I mean secrecy at Apple is the coin of the realm.
Greetings, folks, and welcome.
This may make jobs so mad he'll delay the phone for a year.
800-282-2882, if you want to be on the program.
The email added.
I'm just making that up, but I mean I wouldn't be surprised.
I'm getting my iPad when the when the uh April 30th is when they say they're going to be available in the stores, but I ordered mine from the Apple store online, so whenever they ship it.
I got the one with the 3G in it as well as the Wi-Fi.
I didn't go out and get just the Wi-Fi only.
Uh I I'll just I'm patiently waiting for it.
Where was I?
Oh, yes, a phone number 800-282-2882.
If you want to be here on the program, the email address, Lrushbo at EIBNet.com.
Barbara Boxer last night at her fundraiser with Obama said, This is after Obama tells her supporters, it's up to you.
She may lose this election.
She may lose.
Unless you really work hard.
It would have nothing to do with her incompetence, have nothing to do with her idiocy, her record, her ideology.
No, no, no, no.
If her supporters don't work hard, uh then she's toast.
So after they hear that, she stands up and she says, are you ready to go toe-to-toe to them cup by cup by cup?
I'm asking myself, what kind of cup is she talking about?
Is she talking about a teacup?
Is she talking about a coffee cup?
Or is she talking about a protective cup that you put in an athletic supporter?
For those of you in Rio Linda, Jockstrap.
Because I'm ready to go cup by cup by cup with them, Boxer said.
We are in a run for our life.
We're all being tested now.
The times are testing us.
No, Barbara, you are testing us.
The American people are being tested by your policies, your socialism, your crony capitalism, your attempt to take over our government with crap and tax, and now this financial regulatory reform bill.
In the big scheme of things, Babs, your election is meaningless.
Except, of course, to her.
Now here's the remaining sound bite.
Uh Obama got so exasperated that he asked a heckler if they wanted to come up to the stage, and then he left the podium to go whisper something in Boxer's ear, because he was losing control of the crowd.
So now we when you hear the bite, you will you will know what he went to Boxer to ask about.
I'm sorry, do you want to come up here?
I just uh everybody, I I just wanted to confirm.
I just wanted to confirm, I just checked with Barbara.
So if anybody else is uh thinking about starting a chance, Barbara didn't even vote for don't ask, don't tell in the first place.
So you know she's gonna be in favor of repealing Don't Ask, Don't Tell.
So the whole campaign appearance here got sidetracked, hijacked here by a gay activists upset about don't ask, don't tell the fact that it was not repealed.
And he had to go ask uh Boxer.
You gotta get me out of this, Babs.
What's your position on this?
So she did, and uh that was it.
But it would it it was not smooth sailing out there.
Uh the national media reporting on the protests outside.
Uh and was was just the uh Republican side dangerous and violent, or were the Democrats Democrat side too?
This is last night in LA on C Cal Channel 9's News Central, a portion of Dave Bryan's report about Obama's trip to LA.
When he arrived in LA, as the presidential motorcade rolled up South Figaroa to exposition park, young Republican protesters yelled from one side of the street.
No, the taxes we are not your ATM.
There were protests on both sides of the street of Figaroa today, with Republicans on one side and anti-war Democrats on the other side.
Anti-war Democrats on the other side.
I wonder if there was any sedition going on out there.
I wonder if there was any sedition taking place.
Anti-war Democrats protesting Obama.
So was just the Republican side dangerous and violent.
That's been the template.
That's been the narrative of these anti-war Democrats, were they dangerous and violent too?
Uh then at this uh fundraiser for Barbara Boxer.
Uh there's another clip from the uh soundbite that another unidentified guy shouts at Obama.
I just want to make sure their anger is properly directed because we were for putting 200 billion dollars in tax cuts into the pockets of the American people.
Here in California, 98% of working families are getting a tax cut.
So that's what we were for.
And that's what the other side was against.
You're welcome.
Thank you for my tax cut.
You're what another one of the Obama robots uh and uh and minions out there.
So it's uh Road Show continues.
Let's go back to Charlie Rose last night, Rahm Emanuel.
This is at a different interview point.
Remember our earlier soundbite, Ram Emanuel said we didn't know what the SEC was doing.
It's independent agency.
I mean, the New York Times knew about it before we did.
We didn't even know we just wouldn't knew how it would hit the news.
Charlie Rose said, What a ha how does it happen?
Well, it's an independent agency.
And Charlie Rose said, Well, how do you how do you not know what the SEC is doing before the New York Times does?
Well, it's like an independent agency.
We don't consult with them.
We don't know.
Well, how did you have a website set up and and buy some links from Google to take searches of Goldman Sachs and SEC to the Obama website?
Well, uh, we didn't know it was an independent uh agency.
We Yeah, but how did you know to do all this so early and so well in advance?
Well, it's an independent agency.
Uh we don't know what they do.
Um they didn't tell us the New York Times knew about it before we did.
Yeah, but you had all this stuff in place to take advantage of this SEC ruling, which by the way, the vote on the SEC panel to go forward with the charges against Goldman Sachs was strict party line vote.
Only the Democrats and the SEC voted to go forward.
The Republicans didn't.
Well, it's a perfect point.
It's an independent agency.
Uh yeah, but the Democrats.
The Democrat only the Democrats voted to go after nine months.
Well, there's no coincidence here.
Uh it's uh there is a coincidence.
It's just a coincidence.
We we there's this independent agency.
We don't we don't uh coordinate.
Well, we didn't know this was gonna come.
Uh we we we only knew about it when we read it in the New York Times.
Okay.
So at a different point in the um in the interview, Charlie Rose said, can President Obama turn this anger around?
This is Representative Democrats that they have a voice and they have to be heard too and shouldn't be dismissed.
There's a legitimacy there.
That doesn't take elected leaders off the hook.
When you have that role of leadership, you have a responsibility to make sure that we have a proper debate and don't encourage that anger to drift off into something that's ugly, as we saw on this 15-year anniversary in Oklahoma.
I think sometimes the media doesn't act with the full responsibility comes with their position.
They play a role in exacerbating the sense that America's pulled apart.
And it's not as pulled apart as being remote.
So uh I guess this is the source for where Clinton's theme came from.
Uh all that anger out there and all these words.
I'm still I'm still, you know, I asked President Clinton and President Obama yesterday, please would you give me the words that caused McVay to go bonkers?
Give me the words.
What what words did all did did McVeigh hear to make them go bonkers?
It's just words.
So Charlie Rose said, well, um who's doing this?
I mean, who who who's who's got all this anger?
Who's shouting around out there?
Do you think Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck are part of the process of pulling them apart?
They play that role.
They have their differences.
That's clear, that's okay.
But they do play a role in exacerbating tensions.
And that could be also said about some on the left, but there's no doubt they do.
Oh, yeah.
No doubt we exacerbate tensions.
Of course, they in the White House.
Kind, compassionate, soft spoken.
They're not exacerbating anything.
They're unifyers, right?
They came to put us all together to heal the earth, to lower the seas, to lower the temperature, to bring about a new respect for government.
All of those things abject failures.
McVeigh wrote in a letter to the media that Oklahoma City was a retaliatory strike, a counterattack for the cumulative raids and subsequent violence and damage that federal agents had participated in over preceding years, including but not limited to Waco.
Ron Emanuel.
Oh, yeah.
These guys, they they you know, they exacerbate tensions out there.
This is the guy who in a Democrat National Committee fundraiser standing at the head table, listing and shouting the names of political opponents with a knife in his hand and stabbing the table with the mention of each name and saying, Dead.
Dead.
Of course, these people, they're kind, compassionate unifies, uh not exacerbating tensions at all.
They are purposely dividing this country.
Obama came to divide, as we now know.
Back after this.
And we're back, Rush Limboy and the excellence at Broadcasting Network.
Gonna get to your phone calls here in just a second.
One more.
Barbara Boxer soundbite, this from April 17th.
Uh, just about three days ago, she was in Los Angeles.
I need you to be excited, as excited as the Tea Party people are.
Will you help me?
Will you get excited?
Now you know you are in trouble when you have to beg your supporters to get excited.
And then does she forget her supporters hate the Tea Party people?
The Democrat Party from from Obama on down has got a campaign to demonize the Tea Party people, and now here's Barbara Boxer who wants her supporters to emulate them.
I thought they were causing riots.
I thought the Tea Party people were about to blow up a building.
Didn't Bill Clinton tell us this on Friday?
That's right.
That's right, Limba, you got around you, man.
You never forget a thing I say, do you?
That's right.
I set the stage for it, because we know there's going to be violence in violent country, Obama seeing to it.
It's part of the plan.
So when it does happen, all I had to go out there and say is if Tea Party people are going to inspire it.
Uh Barbara Boxer, it's a little stupid thing for her to say here to ask her supporters to be like uh Tea Party people, because uh her supporters may literally believe and go blow something up.
So we're running a risk here, but uh uh I think we can handle it.
Uh if it blows up in LA, nobody'll know.
Back to the phones now, or I should say to the phones.
We'll start with Carol in Olympia, Washington.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Nice to have you here.
Think then Megadetto's Russian from a truly reform Democrat.
I am uh escrow officer and I close uh purchases and mortgage loans.
And the government is now telling us that the banks, the private sector banks, are not allowed to do no down payment loans anymore, that a person has to come in with a certain amount because that's what those evil banks have been doing, but the government is doing those loans.
They're called RDA loans, rural development in our county.
I'm actually south of Olympia, is all considered rural.
And so people come in and they are low-income loans.
They can buy a house with absolutely no skin in the game, as they say.
Um in fact, sometimes they get money back, and they have subsidized payments over the like loan show.
Essentially the affordable housing scam is uh still going full speed ahead.
Oh, sure it is.
Oh, sure it is.
And they're not talking about that too much, but of course so you cannot make no money down loans uh that uh at your bank.
And I'm not a lender.
I'm a I'm an escrow officer.
I close them.
Right.
But no, a bank could not, you're correct.
Yeah.
So but the government can.
Yes, the government can't get away.
Well, now where are you gonna go?
If you if you are a uh a a rural uh Democrat American, uh and you want to buy a house, and the private sector bank in your town will not lend you any money because they're not allowed to, it makes you hate the bank.
They don't trust me.
I know I'd never get any money.
You go to Obama.
You go to the regime's bank, and they give you this loan, and you forever are grateful.
He comes from the Obama stash, you know.
Yeah, comes Obama stash.
Well, we we laugh, but it's it's and then they subsidize the payments as well.
Oh, of course.
Oh, yeah, subsidize the payments.
That's the whole point.
It's not fair that some people shouldn't be able to have a house.
That's correct.
And these are not, you know, these I mean, that's the I just closed one um recently, and it was not, you know, uh a cheap house.
It was uh, I think a reasonable reasonable for our county.
It was a reasonably priced house.
So I think it was you know, it was pretty nice.
Well, I uh I'm I'm glad you called a reported this.
Thank you very much, Carol.
Somebody's gotta keep them honest, you know.
No, that's not possible.
Um, you're doing your best, Russian.
We appreciate it.
Keep the focus on their dishonesty and their tactics and so forth is all we can do.
But I I'm glad you called.
Speaking of homes, it might get tough for people in Manhattan pretty soon, throughout New York, actually.
It has been nearly two decades since New Yorkers faced their last doorman strike.
But as the deadline for a new contract for building workers approached, the questions being posed throughout the city remain largely unchanged on Sunday.
This is from the New York Times, by the way, written by A. G. Schulzberger.
Must be the son of that little pinch, maybe a nephew of the little pinch.
A. G. Soulzberger.
Uh not to be confused with A. B. Stoddard over at the Hill.com or wherever she is.
So here are the questions.
These are the questions being asked throughout New York.
On the cusp of the first doorman strike in two decades.
Who will safeguard my apartment while I sleep?
Who will greet my children when they come home from school?
Who will accept my deliveries?
Who will clean the hallways in my building?
Who will sort the mail at the front desk?
Who will operate the elevator?
And who will let the cleaning lady in?
The uh residents are in a full-fledged panic here, apparently about to be rendered helpless because of the doorman strike.
Many buildings have also posted sign up sheets for residents to volunteer to watch front doors, clean the hallways, take out the garbage, uh, though the forms in the lobbies of a handful of upper east side buildings remain mostly blank.
Sunday so that A. G. Schulzberger went out and did some research.
He went into buildings to see if any of the Upper East Side.
Now it's code Upper East Side is where supposedly the really rich Wall Street conservatives live.
The Upper West is where the touchy feely long haired plastic man and a good time rock and roller liberals live.
So A. G. Sulzberger did not go on to the Upper West Side to see if residents there were volunteering to take out the trash.
He went to the Upper East Side, and he didn't find many names of residents on the volunteer sheets.
Yeah.
Well, the sense of community that could be established here, yes, but uh well, in fact, A. G. Schulzberger says if there is a positive thing to be pulled out of this, it's that it is an opportunity to get to know your neighbors.
Uh and to come together to combat a little bit of adversity.
Because this is not the end of the world, though it may appear that way if the strike goes on.
Yeah, uh you who's gonna greet the kids when they come home from?
How about you?
How about mom or dad?
Oh, I know they're working.
That's right, okay.
Well, does it mean the nanny can't get in?
Is this because there's a no uh doorman not there?
At any rate, uh, all the way down the end of the story close to it, you find out what union represents the doorman.
Though many residents on Sunday said they believed that a deal would be reached before the deadline, little progress was made during contract negotiations over the weekend, said Matt Nurzig, Chief Spokesman, local 32B, Service Employees International Union.
Obama's union.
The SEIU.
And for the record, just so you know, the SEIU actually got started at the beginning of the 20th century, representing Dorman.
That's how the SEIU started.
Uh so this is this is this is what they mean when they talk about how their workers have built this country with the sweat of their brow.
Here's what's at stake here.
Uh elevator operators, doorman, superintendents or 30,000 of them out there earn an average of 40,500 a year with benefits, raising the total to nearly $70,000.
It's reasonable to ask, I mean, who could who could who can expect to get by on a mere $40,000 a year with uh $30,000 in benefits?
Clearly, uh not a lot of social justice going on for the uh there's a tomb of the unknown doormen.
Yes, there is.
Uh the tomb of the unknown doormen is uh down a soho.
You want to hear something pretty outrageous, pretty damned outrageous in any number of ways that you have not seen in American state-controlled media.
This is from the UK Financial Times published on April 15th that almost snuck past us.
Police investigating the alleged theft of emails behind the recent climate gate uproar have been telephoning climate change skeptics to question them about their political and scientific beliefs.
They are not questioning the fraudsters.
They're not questioning the hoaxers.
They're questioning the deniers.
The skeptics.
The Norfolk Constabulary was called in by the University of East Anglia after thousands of its climate scientist confidential emails were published online last November.
The documents appear to show that scientists concealing information and manipulating data to fit their theories, although two independent inquiries have cleared the university of wrongdo.
Of course.
The university, the academy, one of the four corners of deceit.
They circle the wagons to protect each other.
Now the UK Financial Times has learned that everybody who made a request to the university's climate research unit under the freedom of information rules, ahead of the alleged hacking, is being approached by officers searching for the culprits.
They have changed the focus of the investigation to who released these emails and what might have been their political motivation.
They're not looking into the fraud, because that's been taken care of.
Other elites at other academic institutions have said there was nothing here.
Nothing going on here.
Yeah, they left out some information, but they were busy.
You work as many numbers as these guys work with, and it's all gonna end up being a fog someday.
In a letter to the Financial Times, Sebastian Noakes, a businessman and climate change skeptic, said that he was interviewed at length by a detective who wanted to know what computer I used, my internet service provider, and also to which political parties I belonged, what I feel about climate change, and what my climate qualifications in climate science are.
He questioned me at length about my political and scientific opinions.
Now remember, this is just a guy who wanted information From the uh from the climate research uh unit, just wanted you guys are arriving at this conclusion, the hockey stick data.
We're massive warming here since the uh Middle Ages.
We want to see the data that you're using to come to this conclusion.
And they never provided the data because it was all jimmied.
It was all made up.
Or illegitimate in some other way.
So now the people that have requested access to the data are the suspects.
Yeah, what are your political beliefs?
What party do you belong to?
What's your expertise in climate science?
This is how the regime gets you, folks.
This is how the regime gets you.
You go up against the regime, even if you do it in a lawful way.
They'll come at you in an unlawful way.
So they're even going after people outside the United Kingdom.
I don't know what their just uh the jurisdiction is here.
Uh, Charles Rotter, San Francisco-based blogger, who moderates one of the first sites to have published the leaked data, has also been approached by UK police because of his submission of an FOI request.
Local police are being helped by officers from the national domestic extremism team, leading the climate skeptics to question the involvement of a unit set up to counter homegrown terrorists and radicals.
So using a um domestic extremism anti-terrorism team to go after these guys who sought information from the Hadley Crisis or Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia.
Oh.
And now this.
Again, not a word of that in the in the American media, by the way.
From the UK Daily Mail.
The 150 acre farm was the answer to Julian and Jane Davis's dreams of a quiet life in the country.
He would grow crops while she planned to build a wooden chalet to run reflexology therapy and counseling sessions.
Their rural peace was shattered, however, when eight giant wind turbines were erected nearby.
Their constant roar was so bad, the couple and their 20-year-old daughters say they were forced to move into a rented home five miles away.
Mr. and Mrs. Davis have launched a high court writ claiming 380,000 pounds compensation from the owners of the 320 foot turbines, the builders and the landowners.
They claim the constant 66 decibel hum, close to the sound of a vacuum cleaner, was unbearable even though they wore earplugs at night and installed double glazing at the farmhouse in Lincolnshire.
Mrs. Davis 54, former nurse and midwife who survived cancer in 2001 said it's no longer saleable or marketable.
Nobody can sleep there.
If we rented it out, we probably'd end up being sued.
Different people describe the noise as a toy in a tumble dryer or a train that never arrives or a jet waiting to take off.
The lack of sleep became unbearable.
Mrs. Davis, who now campaigns against wind farms, says she knows of fifteen other families who have abandoned their homes.
So we've lost everything.
Clean energy, the future, all these great jobs, the wind farm driving them out.
Now the next story from CNN.
Interior Secretary Ken Salazar to decide on fate of nation's first offshore wind farm.
The site is in Nantucket Sound, one of America's most iconic bodies of water.
Opponents are concerned about historic preservation and safety.
Advocates say the project is a must to move the country forward.
The Reverend William Eddy stands at the bow of his 53-foot sailboat nestled in the postcard setting of Cape Cod.
A lifelong resident of the Cape and the Islands, Eddie, has uh built his stay sail schooner by hand, and on this day he's using it as his pulpit.
A perfect storm, he says, have been brewing over the past ten years among residents driven by hysterics or two hysterics by the idea of putting the first offshore wind farm in the middle of Nantucket Sound.
Eddie loves everything about the Cape, the iconic shingled homes, the Norman Rockwell small towns, the pristine beauty of the sea, most of all the episcopal priest loves the magnificent winds.
And he thinks it's a moral imperative.
As a man of the cloth, it's a moral imperative to harness those winds.
He's told his congregation just that.
He's watched some of them walk out in his sermon.
Father, we all would have stayed if you had just preached about Darfer, one member told him, but we don't want to be preached to about wind and windmills.
Here's the pull quote.
The decision now rests in the hands of one man.
Interior Secretary Ken Salazar.
He has the unenviable choice of cutting through nine years of regulatory red tape.
He can green light the project or kill it.
Now, I'm a little confused about this.
Somebody's going to need to help me out here.
If one guy can cut through all the red tape, nine years of it, if one guy can make the decision, why did we have to go through these nine years?
Why did we have to spend all that money in nine years of red tape?
And if one man, Ken Salazar, can make this decision.
What's that say about the federal government today?
What's it say about the regime?
Can one man undo this decision in the next administration?
What if he says one man could stop it was Ted Kennedy?
Now that Ted Kennedy has moved on, they're back to trying to put the Cronkite didn't want them either, but Cronkite's moved on.
So now they got the two obstacles out of the way.
So now they're moving in there, and Salazar is gonna make the decision.
The only advantage wind energy has it's it's clean, and that's only an advantage if you believe other energy choices are dirty, and the only problem with wind energy is that if you don't have any wind, you got a big problem.
You can't go out there and make wind.
And I don't know if our Native Americans did wind dances or not.
I know they did rain dances, but I've never heard of any dancing for wind.
So the whole idea of wrecking the scenic beauty of Cape Cod is driven by hoax.
Wind energy.
They've got these windmills all over California and duh.
And got more energy problems out there than in any other state.
A main attraction of the windmills, though, for the uh environmentalist wackos is exactly their brutish ugliness on the landscape because that serves as a constant visual reminder of their moral superiority.
They love when they bastardize the beauty of the countryside by putting up these windmills because those windmills are monuments to their power.
Those windmills are a testament to their moral superiority.
Those windmills look what we were able to force on the rubs who live here for their own good.
Same thing with a Prius, same thing with uh the ribbon, whatever color you wear.
I care more than you do.
I'm a better person than you are because I built that windmill and I forced it on you because you don't have the common sense to know what's good for you, or for this country.
And you don't.
I care more than you do about breast cancer.
I don't see you wearing a ribbon like I'm wearing a ribbon.
And that's what all of this is ultimately about.
I'm not sure, but I think that this uh Cape Cod wind farm is gonna interfere with local Indian tribes who worship the rising sun from that.
Well, they've said this recently.
Okay, I wanted to make sure it was this particular wind farm.
I'm uh so many wind farms out there that Indians are not happy with.
This particular Indian tribe was offered a two million dollar bribe to forget their ceremonies, and they rejected it.
That's that's how important the rising sun ceremony is to the Native Americans.
They were offered a two million dollar bribe to forget the ceremony.
And they said, no way.
I wonder if Salazar can just, you know, decree that nuclear power plants are gonna be built.
I mean, if Interior Secretary says, yep, we're gonna go ahead with that wind farm.
Nine years of red tape and money, I'm tired of it.
I'm just gonna make the decision.
Do it or don't do it.
And this, you know, I saw this last night, and I just Wanted to explode.
Flawed computer models may have exaggerated the effects of an Icelandic volcano eruption that has grounded tens of thousands of flights, stranded hundreds of thousands of passengers, and cost businesses hundreds of millions of euros.
Do you realize there are stories now that people have gone broke, waiting for flights out of airports.
They've somehow they've gone, they have it's cost them everything they have to find a hotel.
A hotels are jacking up rates.
You know what I got to thinking about this when when this didn't take me long to get to this question and to arrive at this question.
The environmentalist wackos, if they had their druthers, airplanes wouldn't be flying.
If they had their druthers, there wouldn't be any automobiles on the road.
I mean, don't doubt me.
I mean, this is their the I mean the true wackos, this is their objective.
So here we have Northern and Western Europe basically grounded.
No airplane flights.
And look at the havoc.
Now think back to the days where there were no airplanes.
There was no havoc.
People got around.
They may not have traveled as far.
They may not have had business, you know, in one place uh one day, get home that night or the next day or what have you.
But look.
Look at the the modernization that's taking place.
And look what happens when it fails.
People are utterly unprepared to live and to deal with circumstances that were the norm for humanity up to a hundred years ago.
Stop and think about that.
I interviewed Frank Gaffney, defense policy expert during the Reagan years.
For the next issue of the Limbaugh Letter.
I talked to him on Friday.
One of his big concerns is that the Iranians could load up a small little nuclear device on a boat and start trolling the east coast of the United States.
There's some 2,000 ships a day out there.
How do you know which ones the Mullah's cruise ship?
Launch a little nuke into the and detonate it in the atmosphere and cause an EMP, electromagnetic pulse.
He said, if they took out our electric grid, if they took out our ability for electricity, do you realize the number of mass deaths that would happen very quickly?
So dependent are we on all these.
What got me to thinking about this is that we we live at a time where we've had all of this modernization, all of these terrific advancements that have enhanced life, improved the quality of life, and lengthened the span of life.
And we are being pestered by a bunch of people who have friends in this regime who want to roll all of that back and take us back to the times where life was much more primitive.
Now, people did not die in mass because there wasn't electricity.
Life was harder.
Nighttime was really dark.
You had to have your torches out there or what have you, and that was, you know, only after somebody figured out how to create fire, about which they made a movie.
Imagine if that guy had been able to patent it.
You imagine if that guy had a family, they'd be the richest people in the world.
A guy that invented fire had to patent on it.
Every time a fire happened, this guy got the royalty.
But they didn't think about things like that back then.
They had to so well, you have all these skyons out there like this Schulzberger guy at the New York Times.
You've got the people from the old Firestone tire and rubber, you got the Ford GM, all these family, the melons and so forth.
And now you got all these fourth and fifth generation offspring had no idea what their families did to create it, living off of it.
Uh imagine if the guy who invented fire or discovered it was able to bank that Like Henry Ford did the assembly line for automobiles.
At any rate, I'm I'm really intrigued, folks, by the utter calamity that strikes whole nations when airplanes can't fly.
Look at all that doesn't happen.
Mail doesn't get delivered, overnight express, all everything just comes to a screeching halt.
And you people don't even think about it, especially in the context, well, we gotta stop doing this because we're creating a carbon footprint.
We're destroying the planet.
Global warming with all of these outbursts of energy that we're using.
And yet, when the usage of the energy stopped, nobody is celebrating the uh conservancy here of jet fuel.
Nobody is celebrating the fact that we're saving a little oil here.
Nobody's celebrating any of the uh uh efficiency here.
Everybody's panicked over people's perhaps lack of ability to survive.
Be back after this.
Okay, so a bunch of flawed computer models on the ash cloud, grounded airplanes apparently unnecessarily.
And these were computer models of something happening right now that they couldn't even get right.
They couldn't predict within hours where the wind was gonna take the ash cloud, and yet we are supposed to alter our lives because of what computer models say, global climate temperatures are gonna be in fifty years.
All of liberalism is a giant hoax.
▲
Export Selection