All Episodes
Previous Next
April 19, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:50
April 19, 2010, Monday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Let's see, we're having anniversaries, right, to commemorate the Oklahoma City bombing, right?
Well, I understand that.
Were there any anniversary ceremonies for the Waco invasion?
Have we had any anniversary ceremonies for the invasion of Waco by Janet Reno and U.S. military tanks 17 years ago?
Or did we do it a couple of years ago on that 15th year anniversary and I missed it?
Did we do that?
76 people who died in the Waco fire, including more than 20 children, two pregnant women at the hands of the U.S. military, ordered there by Janet Reno.
And when Clinton was asked about it, well, you know, you got to go talk to Attorney General Reno about that because she's the one ordering that.
I know much about that.
Greetings, folks.
It's Rush Limbaugh.
This is the EIB Network, the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Great to be with you.
Here's the telephone number, 800-282-2882, the email address, illrushbow at eibnet.com.
Let me ask you a question.
It's all over the media.
This was so predictable.
Starting last Wednesday or Thursday into the weekend, the media template was established.
The narrative was there.
Bill Clinton and Obama blaming the Tea Parties for a future Oklahoma City-type bombing, which hasn't happened.
Let me ask you a question.
What was a more likely cause of the Oklahoma City bombing?
Talk radio or Bill Clinton and Janet Reno's hands-on management of Waco?
The Branch Davidian compound, and maybe to a lesser extent, Ruby Ridge.
Don't forget that the Oklahoma City bombing occurred two years to the day after the Waco invasion.
Two years to the day, and Tim McVay as much as said so.
A survey of Tea Party people.
They don't want any part of Timothy McVay.
Nobody does.
No reasonable American does.
But President Clinton now trying to shift blame, all this focus on me and the Tea Parties and talk radio, let's just tell it and identify it for what it is.
It is an attempt, just like they're trying to rewrite the economic history of the 1980s, it is an attempt to rewrite the history of the Oklahoma City bombing and the president's role in it and the administration's role in it.
They know this is about Waco.
They know this is about the U.S. military invading a religious compound.
67 people died in the fire.
We remember watching it.
20 children.
Janet Reno said we have to go in there because children are being abused.
Yep.
They really got abused by the U.S. government.
And this angered some people who didn't quite like this invasion domestically of military power.
But Bill Clinton's ties, I mean, he can try, he and his buddies in the press, the Obama administration, they go out there and they can try to rewrite history and they can try to make Oklahoma City the result of a modern Tea Party movement, which is really what they're trying to do.
But President Clinton's ties to the domestic terrorism of Oklahoma City are tangible.
Talk radio's ties are non-existent.
We had nothing to do with it.
There has never, ever been any.
I mean, it's ridiculous to even assert this.
This is another reason why President Clinton will forever blame talk radio.
It takes the spotlight off of him and his policies and his administration.
Here we have President Obama, a friend of Bill Ayers, a domestic terrorist, a proud community agitator, Barack Obama.
They will always try to be concerned about protests.
But Obama's entire career has been based on agitation.
Obama's entire career has been based on protests.
What was the Million Man March?
Obama was part of it.
What was the racial makeup of the Million Man March?
Louis Farrakhan was the leader, a Jew hater without peer.
Obama, a proud attendee.
And let's talk about Bill and Hillary for a moment.
I'd like to know if they would deny that they participated in numerous protest rallies in their hippie glory days.
We know Clinton traveled to Europe to protest, did he not?
And one more, anybody who attended a civil rights march needs to tell us why protesting discrimination, most heavily supported by Democrats, was fine, but protesting the bankrupting of the country and the takeover of the private sector is not fine.
Why can we protest against discrimination?
Why can we protest against all these other horrible things, the power of the military, but somehow protesting against bankrupting the country, protesting the generational theft that has taken place here in this country?
I played golf yesterday afternoon with some guys that are, for all intents and purposes, Wall Street guys.
They don't live on Wall Street or work there, but they're in the financial business.
And they said, Rush, dirty little secret.
This debt's never going to get paid down.
It's gotten to the point where everybody knows we can't pay it down.
There's no way to pay this debt down.
There's no way California is going to retire its debt.
There's no way California is going to make up for the unfunded or underfunded pensions.
And one of the reasons is it's precisely because it's so big.
It's gotten so big on purpose.
So there's now not even pretense of paying it down.
The only thing that has to happen is for leaders to appear responsible in managing it.
And they said, Rush, how do you appear responsible in managing debt?
You do it by raising taxes.
This will get the approval of leftists around the world, other governmental leaders, the TRICOMs and others, people who hold our debt.
They'll be happy when they see we're trying to manage it and deal with it after they've run it up to the point of stealing the wealth of future generations three and four generations down the road.
I said to him, I understand what you're saying, but it's all going to collapse at some point.
This is unsustainable.
I mean, you're talking about tax increases of the sorts that are going to prevent economic growth at some point.
You know, look at Greece.
Look at a lot of these European Union nations.
I mean, at some point, it does come due.
At some point, the debt has to be paid down.
At least you have to get started paying it down.
If the attitude is it's so big, everybody knows we'll never pay it down that you never even start, then we got even more problems than I thought we had.
Then we got around to talking about Goldman Sachs.
And, you know, it's amazing.
These are very, very smart guys, brilliant guys, but they were hearing for the first time my theory that this whole thing was organized with Goldman probably involved in it.
I mean, here's Obama seeking another pillar in his agenda, financial regulatory reform.
He's got to demonize Wall Street.
The Democrats are out saying Van Holland and the others are out saying that is their plan going into the November elections.
They're going to demonize Wall Street again.
They're going to blame the Bush policies again for being responsible for where we are economically right now.
Lo and behold, after nine months of investigation, this SEC investigation, nine months, miraculously, by one of the most profound coincidences, they announced the results of the investigation that there has been fraud at Goldman Sachs involving mortgage-backed securities, derivatives and all this sort of thing.
The day after Obama makes his big pitch for financial regulatory reform and Chris Dodds on the floor of the Senate.
And lo and behold, by Friday and Saturday, we had stories, and I've got them here in the stack of stuff, talking about how this might be a propitious event.
I mean, the state-run media is right in there as though this is totally accidental, totally coincidental.
And I was saying to these guys yesterday, you know, Goldman would be happy to pay whatever civil fine here.
And if there even is one, they'll be happy to pay a little civil fine here and take the PR hit in exchange for being in bed with the Obama administration for the next 10 years or 8 years or however long it's going to be, six years.
That's what they're planning on.
How many Goldman, ex-Goldman people are in government?
Hank Paulson was Treasury Secretary.
Robert Rubin, an ex-Goldman guy.
So these things are not actually, there's no coincidence, especially on the Democrat Party side and with the American left.
There aren't any coincidences in politics.
So we have the weekend.
Goldman Sachs rotten to the core, meaning Wall Street's rotten to the core, meaning the Washington, the regime has to come in here to save the day, protect us, the little guy, from these bandits on Wall Street, when in fact the government caused the problem in the first place.
It was a government-caused problem.
This happens frequently.
Government goes in, causes the problem, and then sits back and says, whoa, look at how unfair and rotten the private sector is.
Look at how bad capitalism is.
Why we have to go in there and fix this mess.
You just can't trust these people on Wall Street.
You can't trust these people in the private sector.
I mean, all this unfettered economic activity going on out there, like Obama said, we are the most regulated economy for a supposed free society that I've ever seen.
So here's Clinton.
Okay, time now to shift the blame back to me, back to talk radio, onto the tea parties for the Oklahoma City bombing and future bombings.
You know, I remember Wayne Lapierre was on this week with David Brinkley one Sunday.
And I think it was with Brinkley.
It was sometime in the 90s.
You remember this?
And Wayne Lapierre said, I think he said this to open the program.
He was the first guest.
Wayne LaPierre of the NRA said, I think President Clinton is comfortable with a certain level of violence because it allows him to push for his anti-gun agenda.
And I said, that is dead on right on the money.
So here they are now talking about a future event based on words.
It wasn't words that ticked off Timothy McVay.
It was actions taken by the U.S. government.
Waco invasion.
To a lesser extent, the Ruby Ridge.
So they're out now trying to make all of this our fault and talking about an event that hasn't happened.
They were predicting it's going to happen and they're going to blame the Tea Party for it, almost as though it would help them if an event occurred.
So anybody who attended a civil rights march needs to tell us again why protesting discrimination, that's fine, but we can't protest bankrupting the country.
And by the way, we're not blowing up buildings and we're not throwing bricks through buildings and windows.
We are attending peacefully, and a whole bunch of lib reporters are reporting that they actually enjoyed the festive atmosphere at one of these things in Washington.
But who are Obama and Clinton?
I mean, let's call a spade a spade.
You know, I got to think, I was.
Can I say, let's call a spade a spade now?
I said Clinton's going to work.
You know, he gets so sensitive about old, just common everyday phrases.
Obama and Clinton are former protesters, protesting protesters.
I mean, that's precisely what's happening here.
Obama and Clinton are former protesters, protesting protesters.
They got their start in politics attending and organizing protest rallies.
They know better than anybody how dangerous to those in power protesters can be.
They can be the training ground for future presidents.
The protest march, we might, these guys know from where they came.
Obama and Clinton both, and Hillary II throw her in there.
They're looking at this.
Oh my God, the next president may be coming out of one of these tea parties unless we do everything we can to discredit this bunch of people.
Anyway, I haven't even scratched the surface.
I haven't even gotten to one item in either of my stacks of stuff.
I haven't gotten yet to even one soundbite.
And folks, I'm all over the soundbites.
It's a shame.
You know, I try never to talk about me on this program.
I try never to make me the issue.
I can't.
Well, I've been, whoa, oh, yeah.
Oh, yeah.
I was accused yesterday of sedition.
80% of the American people disapprove of government power right now.
80%.
It's a pure research center poll.
80% of the people do not like the level of power the government has now.
They don't like it.
Are they guilty of sedition?
You know why I'm guilty of sedition?
Because I use the word regime.
I'm guilty of sedition.
It was Joe Klein on Matthew's Sunday show.
He said Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck are guilty of sedition.
And this John Heileman guy who wrote that book with what's his name, Halperin, that they kept all that information for their book rather than the campaign.
Hey, I got to throw Limbaugh in there.
Limbaugh is sedition too.
Byron York, just as he did with Matthews, has gone back to the Nexus database and found that Mr. Heilemann himself has used the word regime numerous times.
In fact, even once describing Obama.
Hell Rushbow, half my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair.
800-282-2882, AP story.
The Securities and Exchange Commission offered Goldman Sachs a chance to take a fine over this.
They refused because they refused to do that because their position is that they have done nothing illegal.
And all it is is a civil fine.
They're going to take a hit here.
There's no question, but I think they're, I just think they're in on it.
I think they're happy to take the hit here, pay the fine, and roll on.
They obviously have no problem with the Healthcare Regulatory Reform Act.
And one of the reasons why is it's not going to really hurt the big guys that much, but it's going to run a lot of little guys out of business.
It's going to open the market up for these big guys.
And they've got so many ex-CEOs in and out of government all the time.
There's no way this is a coincidence.
And Barney Frank's even out there saying that this fraud case will increase the chances that the financial reform bill will pass.
That's what he says.
Very clearly.
He's not even afraid of facts.
Don't even want to hide it.
Now, Bill Clinton.
That's right.
Those voiced on the radio back in the 90s, they worked up all that anti-government fervor.
And you know what happened?
It's a terrible, terrible thing.
But as Rob Emanuel said, a crisis is a terrible thing to waste.
And so we're going to go out there, and we're going to maximize this the best we can.
Everybody knows that we're the ones who have ties to protest past.
But we're going to try to make it look like these people that never protested a day in their life, but just now started it.
They're the people blowing up the country.
We're going to get away with it because the media is kissing our butt every damn day because they want to be invited to all our parties.
So we're going to own the issue, Limbaugh.
There's no way you can win this, no matter what you say.
Fine and dandy.
Here's the thing: let us not forget Bill Clinton ignored terrorism throughout the 90s.
As a result, the country was attacked on 9-11.
Deborah Burlingame with a great column in the Wall Street Journal today, it's just not 9-11.
How about the World Trade Center bombing in 93 on Clinton's watch, the Cobar Towers on Clinton's watch?
There were so many acts of terrorism in this country and around the world on Clinton's watch.
He didn't care about it.
He didn't want to take on hard issue.
He loved that 65% approval number.
So throughout the 90s, we are the victims of terrorism acts by people Obama will not even call terrorists now.
Bill Clinton and Janet Reno didn't just threaten violence at Waco, they delivered it.
As a result, American citizens, children, women, mothers were killed.
And what followed was a domestic terrorist bombing in Oklahoma City.
And President Clinton, who has had a direct and indirect role in so much pain and domestic violence, lectures us about threats and acts of violence.
This is what he has written in the New York Times today: a column.
15 years ago, the line was crossed in Oklahoma City.
In the current climate, with so many threats against the president, members of Congress, other public servants, we owe it to the victims of Oklahoma City and those who survived responded so bravely not to cross that line again.
Do you hear what I'm saying, Limbaugh?
Sounds reasonable if you don't know the history of this guy to Juanita Broderick in a hotel room in Arkansas.
It just put some ice on that lip.
President Barack Obama to Jane Sturm, August 9th, 2009.
Maybe you're better off not having the surgery.
Just give your mom the pain pill.
Barack Obama quoted by Politico, June 14, 2008.
If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun.
Because from what I understand, folks in Philadelphia like a good brawl.
I've seen Eagles fans.
They hit, we hit back twice as hard.
Who do you think it was that taught Acorn how to protest?
Barack Obama.
Has Acorn ever said anything provocative?
And from our president's staff, if you get hit, we'll punch back twice as hard.
That's Jim Messina.
And the big finish from Clinton scolded American people for behaving like thugs before Oklahoma City.
And now Clinton believes a Democrat nominee, far from practicing a unifying transformational brand, is nothing but a Chicago thug.
That was Bill Clinton on Barack Obama in 2008.
You know, I wonder if President Obama ever heard Reverend Wright say anything provocative from the pulpit of the church in Chicago,
such as the Gee damn, America, America's chickens have come home to roost, said seemingly understanding why World Trade Center and the Pentagon were hit on 9-11.
Now, we know that Obama did hear Reverend Wright say anything provocative.
He said so in his famous historic speech about race, where he admitted that he heard Wright say many divisive and outrageous things.
I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community.
I can no more disown him than I can disown my white grandmother, a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.
These people are a part of me and they're a part of America, this country that I love.
That's his big famous race speech back in March of 2008.
So if words incite, and I'd say Obama has heard plenty of them, one of his good buddies, Bill Ayers, blew up the Pentagon and said his only regret was they didn't do more.
So if President Clinton and Obama want to run around and talk about the power of words to incite behavior and ignore what happened on the ground in Waco, Texas, then I'm sure we can find in their pasts plenty of people who have had very provocative words for them.
Now this poll, this is from the Pew Center.
Nearly 80% of Americans say they can't and they have little faith that the massive federal bureaucracy can solve the nation's ills.
The question, can you trust Washington?
You realize here only 20% of Americans do not agree with me.
Better stated, 20% of Americans are not willing to admit that I'm right.
80% of Americans say they cannot trust Washington and they had little faith that the massive federal bureaucracy can solve the nation's ills.
Are all of these people guilty of sedition?
80%?
I wonder what the political elite class thinks of this.
I know what they think of it.
They're blaming us.
They're blaming me.
They're blaming talk radio.
They're blaming conservative bloggers.
They're blaming the entire new media for creating this circumstance where 80% of the American people lack trust in the government.
This poll was released yesterday, and according to the government-run Associated Press, it illustrates the ominous situation facing President Obama and the Democrat Party as they struggle to maintain their comfortable congressional majorities in this Paul's election.
Notice that everything is about the Democrats remaining in power.
Oh my God, 80% don't trust the government.
Oh, geez, what does that mean for Obama's power?
What does that mean for the Democrats in their comfortable majority?
What does it mean for the country, AP?
And a toxic environment like this, writes AP, and lots of incumbent Democrats could be out of work.
Oh, no, no, really?
The survey found that just 22% of those questions say that they can trust Washington almost always or most of the time.
Just 19% say that they are basically content with it.
Nearly half say the government negatively affects their daily lives, a sediment that has grown over the past dozen years.
Andrew Cohut, trust in government rarely gets this low.
He's director of the Pew people.
Some of it is backlash against Obama, but there are a lot of other things going on.
He said that politics has poisoned the well.
The survey found that Obama's policies were partly to blame for a rise in distrustful anti-government views.
In his first year in office, the president orchestrated a government takeover of the Chrysler and GM car companies, secured a porculous package, rushed to overhaul the health care system.
But the poll also identified a combination of factors that contributed to the electorate's hostility.
The recession that Obama inherited from Bush, a dispirited public, and anger with Congress and politicians of all leanings.
Yes.
Matthew Dowd, a top strategist in Bush's reelection campaign, now shuns the GOP label, says both parties are missing the mark.
He says what the country wants is a community solution.
Hey, Matthew, sounds like we have the perfect president for that.
Got a community organizer.
Community solution to the problems, but not necessarily federal government action.
Whoa.
What's the good news here?
The good news is America wants its country back.
The bad news is that we're getting close here to every American agreeing with me.
I mean, do you realize only 20% don't now?
Either way, 80% of America agrees with me.
A dangerous, divisive provocateur.
If you listen to President Clinton, President Obama, the state control media, and the Democrat Party, I am a dangerous guy, a divisive guy, an agent provocateur.
But the poll says that my opinions are shared by 80% of Americans, and Obama's and Clinton's views have been thoroughly rejected.
Going back to September 11, 2008, Obama.
President Obama addressed the wide distaste for government and the fact that he and John McCain are running against Washington at the Forum on National Service at Columbia University.
Our campaign from the beginning has been about changing government, he said, recalling some great accomplishments of American government, civil rights legislation, the interstate highway system, the national park system.
Obama said he would transform Washington and make government cool again.
Really?
Do you know that with this survey from the Pew Center, trust in government is lower than during the Bush years?
Trust in government lower than during the Bush years.
Congressional approval is at a record low.
Ladies and gentlemen.
And yet, 80% of the American people agree with me.
A provocateur.
A divisive individual.
And yet, the president of unity?
The president of love and the falling sea levels.
Why hasn't he stopped, by the way, the volcanic ash?
How about this?
Canceled, ladies and gentlemen, a trip to Poland for the funeral of the deceased president there and went out and played golf 32nd time.
Obama has played golf.
Bush quit after playing 24 times.
You know, just not right me out there playing golf in the middle of war in Iraq.
So Obama happily cuts off the trip, doesn't go over there.
This ash cloud, I just have a thought.
They closed all these airports like in London, Heathrow and Gatwick.
Now, I understand you can't take off going north and east.
What's to stop them from taking off and launching south and west?
Now, I have a couple friends over there who can't get back to America.
And I don't think the cloud, yeah, there's some talk of it hitting northeastern coast of Canada, but why can't they take off and head west?
Well, Rush, because they, you know, the whole system's very involved.
They just can't, they got to get those planes back there.
And the whole interwar, you can't just say, okay, we're going to launch to the west because those airplanes have to eventually get back to take people in the whole myriad spoke of a system.
I understand that.
But anyway, they're going to open airspace tomorrow, ostensibly.
And the volcano is continuing to erupt.
Could go on for six months.
Okay, brief time out.
We'll get to audio soundbites when we get back.
Plus, your phone calls right here on the EIP.
Oh, one thing before we go.
I want to get out the leukemia and lymphoma.
Donation telephone number one more time, 877-379-8888.
I had a lot of emails today from people who said that they didn't know they could continue to call through the weekend, and then they saw that service was not going to be available on Monday.
They felt bad about it.
It is.
It's through today.
Also at rushlimbaugh.com or a phone call to contribute to leukemia lymphoma.
The annual curathon, we did it on Friday, set another record amid 16% real unemployment.
Just astounding.
They actually, after the program on Friday, our volunteers for the Leukemia Lymphoma Society actually popped a cork on a bottle of champagne.
You made a lot of people's year with what you all did on Friday.
Again, it's 877-379-8888 if you wanted to but couldn't over the weekend.
Be right back.
Now, let's not forget, folks, the real point of the Pew poll.
While we may rejoice in it, and while we may take pleasure in it, that's not the reason for the publication of the poll, and that's not the result that will be taken by the regime or by the Democrat Party.
The point of the Pew Poll is to prove that we have become a nation of irrational government haters.
That's the point.
That's the point.
They're not out there saying, oh, my gosh, what's the government doing wrong?
Oh, people don't want.
They're saying, look at these people.
Look at these people.
They have an irrational dislike of the government.
No wonder.
And the government's got to do something to stop this.
This will be a call for even bigger government.
This is how this all works.
Don't frown at me, snurderly.
Don't doubt me.
Do you think the Pew Center is on our side of things?
How many times do we say, would anybody in their right mind think that?
No, they're not in their right mind.
The regime is not in their right mind.
The Democrat Party is not their right mind, but they have the power right now, and they will have to November.
And they're going to look at this poll, and they're going to confirm everything that they believe.
They've had Clinton out there saying this weekend.
See, Limbaugh, you can do all you want.
You can say all you want.
80%, 80% of American people think government's gone to hell.
It's your fault.
You've been shouting this BS ever since I was in office, Limbaugh.
And you and your buddies now in the right wing.
Fox News, guarantee you, that's what this all means.
That's going to be their take.
You know, It isn't hate when the Democrats protest the government.
When they're out there trying to, you know, publish books on how to assassinate George W. Bush, making movies.
No, no, that's literature.
That is art.
And we must take time to understand the rage that went into these works.
It's a two-sided coin out there.
Deborah Burlingame, I mentioned, she had a piece 2008, February 12th.
And no wonder 80% of Americans don't trust big government.
Bill Clinton had to surrender his law license for five years for lying to a federal judge under oath in a Lewinsky case, $90,000 fine.
But that's not the big deal.
In 1999, Bill Clinton pardoned 16 members of two violent Puerto Rican nationalist organizations, the FALN.
And while the pardon scandals that marked Bill and Hillary Clinton's final days in Orifice are remembered as transactions involving cronies, criminals, and campaign contributors, the FALN clemencies of 1999 should be remembered in the context of the increasing threat of domestic and transnational terrorism that was ramping up during the Clinton years of alleged peace and prosperity,
to wit the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, the 1995 Tokyo Subway sarin gas attack, the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, two years after the Waco invasion, the 1995 Bojinka conspiracy to hijack airplanes and crash them into buildings, the 1996 Cobar Towers bombing, the 1996 Summer Olympics bombing,
Osama bin Laden's 1996 and 1998 declarations of war on America, the 1998 East African Embassy bombings, the 2000 USS Sullivan's bombing attempt, the 2000 USS Cole bombing, the 2000 Millennium bombing plot.
It was within that context that the FBI gave its position on the FALN clemencies, which the White House succeeded in keeping out of news coverage, but ultimately failed to suppress, stating that the release of these individuals will psychologically and operationally enhance the ongoing violent and criminal activities of terrorist groups, not just in Puerto Rico, but throughout the world.
Deborah Burlingame writing about the Clintons terror pardons, February 12, 2008.
You know, we don't forget, Mr. President, we have research arms.
We have great, great memories.
And we, like Ms. Burlingame has just done and I have amplified all these terrorist acts occurring during your presidency when you didn't do anything about it and pardoning terrorists.
And now all of a sudden, starting this past weekend, it's our fault that something that hasn't happened is going to happen or might happen.
When your administration presided over terrorist act after terrorist act after terrorist act, not that you committed them, except one, Waco.
That too, Ruby Ridge.
Waco's a biggie.
Here's the soundbites.
I'm not going to play any Clinton soundbites from over the weekend.
You've heard him.
I do a better Clinton than even he does now.
But here is the state-run media hyping the so-called war of words between a provocative and divisive radio talk show host and a former president of the United States.
There's a war of words lighting up between Bill Clinton, Rush Limbaugh.
The war of words.
The war of words between President Clinton and Rush Limbaugh.
The War of Words, Bill Clinton and Rush Limbaugh.
The War of Words between former President Clinton and Rush Limbaugh.
The war of words between former President Bill Clinton and radio host Rush Limbaugh.
Bill Clinton ended up in a war of words with Rush Limbaugh.
Number one story in politics tonight, the war of words between Bill Clinton and Rush Limbaugh.
So that was over the weekend and this morning.
A montage, if you will, of all the media types that got the memo.
A war of words is the way we're going to describe this.
Now, why did they pardon the FALN terrorists?
Let's not forget this.
They pardoned them to get the Puerto Rican vote for Hillary, who was running for the Senate in New York.
They wanted the Puerto Rican vote for Hillary, so they pardoned the FALN terrorists.
That's why they did it.
And speaking of violence and terrorism, let's not forget the Unabomber.
The Unibomber, living in a little one-room shack slightly larger than the hut that Obama's brother still lives in, contained a copy of Al Gore's book.
The Unibomber.
Had Al Gore's book.
And it was highlighted.
So I am divisive.
The Tea Party is responsible for things that have not happened.
Speaking out against the government is sedition.
Let's go back, if you can bear it, one more time.
April 28, 2003, Hartford, Connecticut.
I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration, somehow you're not patriotic and we should stand up and say, we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration.
And of course, that's not seditious.
No, no, no, that's patriotism.
The new definition, 56% support the repeal of health care.
▲
Export Selection