It's already into our last hour and the fastest week.
Already Thursday.
This week seemed to go by even faster.
It's tax day is today.
Seems like it got here lickety split.
Great to have you with us.
Telephone numbers 800-282-2882.
And the email address El Rushbow at EIB net.com.
From the government run Associated Press Airlines writer.
Six Democrat senators want to hit U.S. Airlines with a tax if they charge passengers for their carry-on bags.
The Senator said Wednesday that this would keep more airlines from following the lead of Spirit Airlines.
Small Florida Airlines said last week that starting August 1st, it's going to charge its customers as much as $45 to bring a bag aboard its aircraft and put it in an overhead bin.
Air travelers have been forced to pay a barrage of fees for once free amenities since 2008 for everything from checked bags to pillows to food.
It's not stopped them from flying, but critics say charging for carry-on bags is stepping over the line.
The Senators, Jean Shaheen of New Hampshire, Chuck Ewish Schumer of New York, Ben Cardin of Maryland, Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, and Robert Menendez and Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey want a law that would designate carry on baggage as a necessity for air travelers.
The airlines currently pay a seven and a half cent tax to the federal government for every dollar they collect in fares, but no tax is imposed on fees collected for non-essential service.
Aha!
Aha!
Read far enough and you find out what really is going on here.
They said the Treasury Department last January ruled that carry-on bags are not essential for air travel, and so they can't collect any tax.
Now I don't want you to misunderstand here.
I have no brief for the airlines charging this stuff.
I'm I'm not.
You know, I I know what is an outgrowth of.
It's an outgrowth of the creeping, again creeping up price, gasoline and jet fuel.
I understand exactly what's going on here, uh, an attempt to generate more revenue.
But look how fast these guys got into action.
One little airline in Florida, and you've got six Democrats trying to pretend that they're Robin Hood White Knights, running to the rescue of air travelers.
Well, Senators Schumer and Shaheen and Cardin and Clobushar and Menendez and Loutenberg.
Do you think maybe you could look at taxes and regulations and levies on American citizens that are placed there by the government are just as onerous and just as outrageous at what the airlines are trying to do by charging 45 bucks for a carry-on?
Do you think maybe you want to look at the way you are nickel and diming citizens all through throughout this country?
Taxes on virtually everything now.
Why is it nobody has this reaction when the government announces another tax?
It's nothing more than a price, nothing more than a new cost.
Okay, so the airline is evil for charging $45 for a carry-on bag.
That's chump change compared to what the government's charging people.
At least the airline gets you where you're going.
This government apparently is not even making a commitment to defend the people of the country.
We are disarming, we're taking down missile shields that we had pledged in Europe.
We are destroying the U.S. economy and the private sector.
We're doing the federal government, this regime is doing far more damage to this country than Spirit Airlines could ever hope to do.
On some flights, Spirit Airlines charges as little as $9 one way.
Uh this I folks it really is amazing.
These guys will just jump into action in anything going on in the private sector that they view as uh rape or punitive.
Well, they want to run into white knights, don't they?
They really Do.
But when they impose onerous things like this on us numerous times a year, nobody comes to our defense against them.
Nobody can go to Lautenberg or Chuck Hugh Schumer and say, you guys can't raise that tax.
You guys can't be this ridiculous.
Nine dollars one way on Spirit Airlines, depending on where you're going.
This whole policy was designed to move through security and boarding faster.
Hence you pay 45 bucks.
Christopher Dodd yesterday on the floor of the U.S. Senate.
He's he's almost lost his mind.
He claims that people are mischaracterizing his baby.
The financial regulatory reform bill.
We have two sound bites.
Here's the first one.
I've been so dismayed over these last 24 hours.
Here are members of this body repeat the utter falsehoods concocted by special interest whose jobs and pensions are plenty secure.
Thank you very much.
That this bill would lead to more bailouts.
Mr. President, it's straight from the Wall Street special interest talking points.
That's what they're determined to do.
Defeat this bill.
By suggesting somehow that there's a bailout provision in this bill.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
The bill, as drafted, ends bailouts.
Yeah, well, how does it do that?
How does it it it creates a $50 billion slush fund and allows the Treasury Secretary and the President to arbitrarily take over a company or shut it down, not bail it out, fire the board of directors, or bring it under federal control.
Nobody's lying about what's in your little baby bill.
You've created a slush according to we're not gonna bail them out.
We're gonna put them out of business.
If Obama doesn't like who they're donating money to, if Obama doesn't like the product, we're gonna put them out of business.
We're gonna force them out of business, Senator.
Of course we're not gonna bail them out.
Now there are some consumer protection provisions in his bill that are pretty good.
You know, credit card companies and so forth.
That's what he ought to be focusing on if he really wants to sell this thing, but they've lost control of it because everybody now knows what the real purpose of the bill is.
The consumer protections are just a little sop in there.
They're gonna get you to support all the rest of this thing because you think there's something in it for you.
What they really want is that ever increasing slush fund to be able to take over, operate, fire, get rid of, downsize whatever they want to do to any company they think is in danger of causing a problem.
In other words, uh there's no and Robert B. Reich goes along with it, too.
Oh, yeah, he does.
He didn't think a bank ought to be bigger than a hundred billion dollars.
He does not think a bank ought to be bigger than one hundred dollars.
Do I have that sound bite here somewhere?
Uh here let me look for it while we play the second Christopher Dodd soundbite from the Senate floor yesterday.
Cracking down on the biggest players is critical to ending bailouts.
And if a Wall Street firm does become too large or too complex and poses a grave threat to our financial stability, the Federal Reserve has the power to restrict its risky activities, restrict its growth, and Mr. President, even to break up those institutions.
That's right.
That's exactly what there will not be any more bailouts.
The government will just have the power to put companies out of business, seize their assets, break them up, fire employees.
And he's upset because they're saying it's a bailout bill.
This is this is so convoluted.
This this piece of legislation is as filled with fraud and deception as was the health care bill.
The real purpose of this is nothing to do with making sure we don't have another economic collapse.
It's nothing to do with ensuring that there aren't business cycles, because nobody can do that.
There's no way you can ever insure against a business cycle, pure and simple.
What this bill is all about is expanding federal control over financial institutions.
Their Democrats are trying to take advantage of the fact that they think you hate financial institutions, that you hate Wall Street, and that you'll go along with Obama occasionally seizing control of some of These places and running them just like the car companies.
They're banking on the fact that you hate banks and wall street firms, and that they can ratchet up your hate to even higher levels so that you will support them because they think you look at them as the white knights, as the angels.
Going into really we're not gonna pay these people any bonuses anymore.
We're gonna make sure they loan to people and it don't make people pay it back.
Yeah.
We're gonna make them treat people fair for once, even if we have to run it ourselves.
Yeah, yeah.
That's what we're gonna that's how they're hoping to sell you, along with the consumer protection aspects of the bill.
Here is former Labor Secretary Robert B. Reich.
Who was on CNN?
Campbell Brown last night.
She said the banks are paying this, but obviously they're gonna pass that on to its consumers, so ultimately we're all paying.
But how many people watch the show?
25,000 people one week.
Watch this show.
Oh, here's the question.
We we all we we we the banks are uh paying this fifty billion dollar fund.
By the way, that's true.
This bill requires the banks to set up the slush fund where the government can come in and take them over.
So Campbell Brown says the banks are paying this, but obviously they're gonna pass that on to its cust customers.
So ultimately, we're all paying for the slush fund, right?
We all pay every time a bank gets into trouble, Campbell.
No bank should be too big to fail.
In fact, I would personally rather in the bill there be a limit on the size of all banks.
No bank should be larger than a hundred billion dollars in assets.
If one finds agree with me, why can't they get that in the bill?
I imagine because Wall Street is very powerful, both with Democrats and Republicans.
Campbell uh so you've you've got a diminutive little lecturer on who says out of the top of his head that no bank ought to be bigger than a hundred billion dollars.
And rather than say why, you say, why?
Why?
Why can't we do that?
Why can't we get a bank no bigger than Well and Labor Secretary Rice, sh.
Well, because Wall Street's very powerful.
Uh too many um too many.
You know, I'm about ready to go on.
I'm gonna accept some of these invitations, thirdly.
Go on go on these shows and get a question.
You know, I before I answer the question, I just want to say that I think no television journalist in prime time ought to make more than one hundred thousand dollars a year, especially on a network that's not making any money, I've been having any viewers.
Back in a second.
And back to the phones we go to uh reward people who have been on hold since this program began.
And this is one of them, Brian from uh New Jersey on the way to DC.
Welcome to the program, sir.
Hi.
Hey, how are you doing?
We're here now.
So you made it, good.
Yeah, it's pretty good.
Um, we're considered to get a Puerto Rican and Irish guy, middle class or union members, uh, right wing extremist tea party or is here to protest a lot of white liberals.
What are we, race?
Let me say I got this straight.
You um you you uh you have a Puerto Rican Irish guy, you got a middle class union members, right wing extremist tea party is uh you gotta see you got a cross section, an ethnic cross section there protesting a lot of white liberals.
A lot of white liberals, yeah.
Seems like the like there's two.
You know what that pretty much sums this up.
It is white liberals that are being protested.
You are exactly right.
Yeah.
This is our 15th Tea Party.
Uh, we come down here to we we have a website, you come down and promote, we get some video and stuff like that, and we just try to get the word out.
And uh we gotta protest a lot of white liberals that are spending us into oblivion.
That they are.
Well, and we're gonna get pulled over for a while because this federal officer was following us, and we have a this idiots for Obama sticker on the back of our car, but he turned away.
We were like, Thank God, we thought we were gonna get pulled over by a federal agent trying to look for a pocket spot down here.
Wait a minute.
You were driving in and you got an Obama sticker on the back of your car?
Oh, yeah, it's idiots for Obama.com.
We're not we're not shy about it, you know.
We're we're here, we're not cowards.
We're here to protest, you know.
What what's what's the truth?
Well, you know, we think oh, I think Obama supporters are idiots.
Wow.
But you didn't get pulled over.
No, he followed us for about a block, and I'm like sitting here nervous going, Oh, should we make a left or should we make a right or should we just keep going straight?
And then the the cop pulled off to the left.
Because we heard rumors they were pulling over people with any um Obama stickers on their car for um you know for the So what is your Obama sticker say again?
It says Idiots for Obama dot com on it.
Oh, so it's just a website that has like you know, I it's just it's just a website that lets people it's all the truth.
Yeah, but no, I'm trying to put myself in the seat of the federal agent following you for the block.
He sees on your bumper the bumper sticker, idiots for obama dot com, and he's gotta be thinking, is the guy inside the car saying he's an idiot for Obama.
Because otherwise, why would he put the sticker on his car?
Well, I know, because it it was a web address.
It's right next to my union sticker, my local number.
You know, it's right next to my identification.
Yeah, that's a good idea.
Federal agent had to be confused.
Idiots for Obama next to a union sticker.
What kind of car are you driving?
Uh it's a big SUV.
All the carbon in the air I can do.
Man, oh man, they didn't know what to do with you.
That's why they gave up after a block.
He was driving an SUV police vehicle Well, that's okay.
The uh the regime can do that.
A regime has no restrictions on what they drive.
Exactly.
Hypocrite.
So uh you're at the Tea Party now.
How many people would you say were there?
Take a wild guess.
Right now there's tens of thousands.
When I was here last September, it was definitely over a million.
But this is only the first part.
There's another part down by the monument at five o'clock, and then on Capitol Hill four o'clock.
There's gonna be there's different ones.
Where before it was just everybody met in one spot and marched all the way up to the hill.
Well, have fun.
Have fun out there as you Yeah, it's gonna be a fun day.
I'm I can tell as you're out there protesting white liberals.
What a great way to put it.
I mean, that's exactly what's going on.
The recent theft of data from a federal student loan guarantor included information about nearly one hundred thousand North Carolinians, according to the attorney general Roy Cooper.
This is I think from uh yesterday w with just a few key pieces of information.
An identity thief can pretend to be you and run up debts in your name if you learn that your information may be in the wrong hands, act fast to protect yourself.
With this latest security breach, four hundred and fifty breaches involving the personal information of millions of people have been reported to the attorney general's office, thanks to state laws designed to protect consumers from identity theft.
Well, I don't know how the laws are working.
Four hundred and fifty breaches, one hundred thousand North Carolinians among student loan data that has been stolen.
What are you waiting for, folks?
It's called life lock.
Very, very simple and very, very cheap.
Life lock.
I mean, nobody's gonna stop identity theft totally, but life lock is your best bet to stop it before it happens, and they will let you know they have this identity theft protection and their their their alert system is the best there is.
You sign up, you do give them your social security number, but they don't sell it.
Nobody is gonna know anything about you other than Life Lock people.
And you will find out when this is happening before it does.
Don't wait.
Call 800 440-4833.
And you can save ten percent off of the already ridiculously low price, simply by mentioning the offer code rush.
That's life lock at 800 440 4833.
I mean, car burglaries are now the latest scheme that is uh being resulting in in identity theft.
Uh Bakersfield, California.
Uh throughout the nation, thieves are finding key holes in your car door handle, punching out the entire lock to break in.
And once they gain entry, if your purse is in there, your stereo theft, whatever, you got anything that identifies you in there, it's uh it's it's gone.
Life lock.
Do not wait.
Here's Cara, she's 19 in Indianapolis.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
Thank you very, very much for having me on your show today.
Great to have you with us.
Yeah.
Okay, well, I'm a little nervous, you can't tell, but I am a freshman in college this year.
I'm planning on being A government teacher, actually.
Um, and I just had very great parents and a great school system to go through that has really brought me up well and have some strong conservative values, even though the school that I go to is not very conservative at all.
Um each and every class time in my English class, we're we are required to read two articles out of the New York Times that he chooses for us.
Uh you have we're required in an English class to read two English class, because we have to write memos about it, so we have to because to him the New York Times is the best thing for them.
So is it English class?
Is this is English composition English?
English one eleven.
All right, so you're th they they ask you to read the New York Times because it is assumed they structure written articles better than anybody else and you can learn from them.
Oh no, just because they have the most the best articles and the most enlightening articles that they are.
So they're wanting you to read in your English comp class, they want you to read the New York Times for content.
Yeah.
Two articles a day.
Yes, sir.
Can you choose the obit section?
I mean, can you choose whichever uh No, it's the opinionated.
It's the opinionated.
Oh, you have to read the op-ed page.
Yep.
Sure do.
And it is.
Okay, if they make you read the opinion pages, a this is a key question here, Kara.
Mm-hmm.
If they make you read the opinion pages of the New York Times, do you read the front page or the op ed page?
The op ed page.
Well, you could read the front page too, because that's opinion as well.
Yes.
Oh, uh yeah, definitely.
You're reading the op ed page in the New York Times, you you are being asked to expose yourself to genuine stupidity, ignorance, and in some cases.
Half of it is an English class, the rest of it is him bashing uh governor or ex Governor.
And you too.
You're the topic of class quite often.
I still say this is progress.
Fifteen years ago, you wouldn't have called me, you'd have been reading the stuff.
And you've been on a protest march the next day.
Okay, so the last caller from Indianapolis, her professor is bashing me while encouraging her to read the opinion pages of the New York Times, which is take your pick of pages, not just the op ed page.
I checked the email during the break.
Right?
Does it bother you that these teachers are ripping you in these no no no, folks, it's been twenty-one years.
It's badge honor.
I I look heavenward.
I say, thank God for my enemies.
But as well as that, these teachers start badmouthing me to these young coeds and college students, and many of them are going, Well, who is this guy?
Why, why why they make want to check it out?
They want to find out what's so bad.
You know, young people love renegades.
Young people love rebels.
And if they're portraying me as some rebel against the cause, rebel against Obama.
Kids are gonna be naturally intrigued.
It's all a positive, folks.
They tune in here and they find out that it's their teachers who have no clue what it is they're talking about.
So this stuff all works out.
I still say as I I had to speed through her call because we were up against it on time, but I still say this is this is progress.
I mean, this stuff's been taught for decades.
Liberalism, leftism, anarchy, Marxism, it's all from the whatever school you go to, the odds are it's taught.
What's new is the students are coming home and calling their parents or calling me and telling me how stupid their professors are.
Ten to fifteen years ago, they wouldn't be calling, they wouldn't be telling their parents, they'd be hating their parents or not telling them the truth.
They would be believing their teachers.
Marty's the left is not look, the left is a minority in this country.
This they're th they they with this is a set of right country.
You look at polling data on any issue or generic ballot.
Conservatism is a a majority in this country, never fails to be.
Especially in the battleground poll.
That question 3D is asked every time they do.
I've got it.
I'm gonna in fact I'm gonna find it here in the stack.
The left is a minority.
They are a j that's why they have to govern against the will of the people.
If they didn't have control of the media, they wouldn't win elections.
They have control of the media, they have Hollywood, they have entertainment, and they have education.
Those are the institutions that they have taken Over and dominated.
They're trying to get rid of any other institution that opposes them.
I don't care what church it is, they're trying to get rid of it.
If they can't get rid of it, they're trying to infiltrate it so the church doesn't stand for what it used to anymore.
They're trying to get rid of talk radio, trying to get rid of the uh the blogs of the right-wing blogs on the internet.
Because they're a minority.
They're a minority made to appear as a majority because they have the media on their side.
This afternoon on PMS, NBC Live, the Anchorette, Tamron Hall spoke with the uh the NASA correspondent for NBC, Jay Barberi, about Obama and the Kennedy Space Center.
All the astronauts from the golden era of the space program have ripped Obama for ending manned space flight, particularly the uh the revised moon program.
They've all come out in unison.
So Obama sort of backed up.
Okay, okay, well, we'll we'll we'll revive because we're gonna put nine or ten thousand people out of work after the last shuttle flight.
So Obama's okay, okay, okay.
Well, we'll we'll revive the capsule program, the Orion, but we're not we're not in this moon business, no more of that.
Because we're a country in decline.
Countries in decline don't explore space.
Countries in decline use NASA to look for evidence of global warming, which is what he intends for NASA.
So there's all kinds of problems down there at NASA because a lot of people are going to lose their jobs after the last shuttle flight this fall.
So Obama's hustling down there to speak at the Kennedy Space Center at Cape Canaveral.
Cameron Hall, the anchorette, says to J. Barbry, in just about 45 minutes, Obama will speak to NASA workers to explain why he's deciding to end plans for America's return to the moon, at least for now.
His administration feels there's a a time to reassess and reset the situation.
It is not his quest to end our attempts to go to the moon, correct?
He's messing up the sandbox, if you will.
But you said there in the introduction that he's coming here to speak to the workers.
And what I've just been told, he's going to speak before about 200 select people in the uh building where they will build the Orion, and not a single worker, I'm told, has been invited.
Wow.
I wonder if the president knows that.
Maybe he'll be told that when he gets over to the building.
Maybe we'll find him pulling in some workers, because after all, that was the purpose of his trip, as you said.
Oh I wonder if the president knows that there are no workers.
How many thousands of people are at NASA?
He's going to the Orion building, 200 people in there, and no workers.
Well, who's mad at Obama?
The workers.
You think they're going to let workers in there?
Gee, I wonder if Obama knows this.
Hey, you think Colonel Sanders knows that they're killing the chickens?
*laughter*
Jay Barberi.
I mean, this guy goes back a long way.
He's been with the space program since the space program was a space program.
Uh, and I've I've loved his work.
I think he's great.
I wonder if the president knows that.
Um, maybe uh maybe he'll be told when he gets over the building, and maybe we'll find him pulling in some workers.
After all, that was the purpose of his trip.
You said the president no?
The president know where the Oval Office is.
What if he knows that?
Bill in Dallas.
Great to have you on the EIV network.
Hello, sir.
Oh, it's good to be here, sir.
How are you doing?
Very well, thank you.
Well, the point I wanted to bring up is the Republicans are overlooking a very powerful tool in their arsenal.
We can shut this madness down immediately.
And that's to simply not authorize uh the debt limit to be raised.
That would shut down deficit spending.
It would shut down government.
Yeah, but that's that's not the way we want to do it.
That's not well.
I I personally would definitely like to do it that way, but uh other pe other people may have different opinions.
Well, the problem with that politically is you don't have a majority of people who don't want the government to function.
There is not a majority of people who want the government to shut down and cease operating.
There is a majority of people who Think it's out of control and way too big.
The minute the debt ceiling doesn't get funded, and everything stops, and the benefit checks cease.
That's the end of the Republican Party being able to reform and revise any of this.
There are ways to go about this, reducing the role of government, the shock value and the symbolic value of not raising the debt ceiling.
I mean, it's tempting.
I understand how you feel about it.
But it has to be done with a with with some political calculation as uh uh as as well.
Besides, I don't think they got the votes to uh stop it.
Well, yeah, they don't.
It's a budget item.
They don't they don't have the votes to uh stop it from happening in real.
I'm I'm not I'm not trying to pour cold water on this idea.
I'm just I'm just saying that that that would be the fastest way for the uh regime to revive all this.
Republics don't care anybody, buddy.
They don't want the government to help you.
They don't want you getting your benefits.
With 10% unemployment and shut down people's lifeline.
Uh this is gonna be a long, slow process reversing this.
It's gonna require some education.
And uh you looking at me like you disagree with me, Snerdle Sturdy.
Would you just not approve the death ceiling?
Is that what you would do?
Yeah.
Yeah, okay.
He's uh he's uh so he's frowning at a caller, not at me.
He's agreeing that I'm absolutely right about this.
Yeah, so there's no question about it.
I have mentioned this before on a number of previous broadcasts, the battleground poll.
Ed Goaz, Solinda Lake.
The April 2010 battleground poll results have just been released.
Bruce Walker at the American Thinker monitors this poll each time it comes out, and each poll, each battleground poll has question D three.
Question D three reads When thinking about politics and government, do you consider yourself to be and then you get six possible answers.
Very conservative, somewhat conservative, moderate, somewhat liberal, very liberal, and unsure, or refuse to answer.
The battleground poll is a bipartisan poll which prides itself on rigorous and open methodology.
It has proven to be one of the most accurate of all polls in predicting the exact percentage of the vote candidates receive in general elections.
Battleground uh lets people see the question, all the questions that are asked, unlike many other polls, since June of 2002.
The Battleground poll is asked this same question in its demographic section and in fifteen consecutive polls.
The answer has always been the same.
Americans overwhelmingly describe themselves as conservative.
What is overwhelming mean in this context?
The percentage of Americans who call themselves conservative in these polls has never been less than fifty-eight percent of Americans.
Conservative strength was uh at its lowest point during uh these years in two in December 2007, when only 58% of Americans describe themselves as conservative.
There has been a remarkable consistency in the responses to this question over the course of this poll.
Sixty point two percent of Americans on average call themselves conservatives.
Now, the result of the April 2010 battleground poll showed nothing has changed.
Fifty-nine percent of Americans call themselves conservative, two percent of Americans call themselves moderate, thirty-four percent of Americans call themselves liberal, five percent were either unsure or refused to answer.
If you remove the unsure refuse to answer, sixty-two percent of Americans are conservative.
Stories from the establishment media, USA Today, LA Times conveniently miss the underlying story about the April 2010 battleground poll.
They miss it every year.
They ignore this question.
Sixty-two percent of the American people call themselves conservative, two percent moderate, thirty-four percent liberal.
It's not a liberal country.
The liberals are a minority in this country.
The left, these radical leftists are a minority governing against the will of the people.
They have to.
They do not have popular support.
All they've got is a popular media, uh media that makes it look like they are the norm, and that everybody else is the kook and the freak in the fringe.
They are the kook, the fringe.
And the freak.
Make no mistake.
Derek in uh Cult California.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Rush, Megadetto, calling you from your adopted hometown of Sacramento.
Thank you, sir.
Yeah, I've been listening to you for 20 some years here.
I just want to clarify something on your being nine uh what, 98, 99 percent right at a time.
Almost always 99.6.
There you go.
Well, I'm that uh small portion which you're wrong about, and that uh I'm here at my second uh tea party, gonna visit a lot of my uh fellow state employees at the Tea Party.
Well, uh, okay, that's wonderful news, but where am I wrong?
Well, sometimes you think that uh you know public employees and whatnot don't believe in uh your problems that weapon with uh with government.
No, public employee union leaders, big it's your leaders and your state people mismanaging your pension, not you.
Oh, yeah, that's why I left my union uh.
No, no, no, no, no, no.
I'm fully aware that rank and file union people, government and outside have a diversity of ideological membership.
I I'm not surprised to hear that there are state workers in tea parties around the country, not at all.
Tommy in Chicago, you're next.
Welcome to the program.
Russ.
I just got back from a tea party down here in Chicago, downtown.
It was phenomenal.
They had one guy stirring up the crowd.
It was like an infiltrator walking around of all things an arrest Bush signed.
And every time he went somewhere and got someone's face, the the network cameras were right there to just uh just to cause trouble.
Or they were taking a picture of him.
What a dumb infiltrator.
They f they focused they focused on him.
I couldn't believe it.
Oh, I totally believe it.
What they were hoping for is that one of you in the crowd would uh sock the guy.
Take him out.
Touch him in the nose or something.
That's what they were hoping you would do.
This what an idiot infiltrator.
Arrest Bush?
The sign ought to be arrest Obama.
Arrest Obama, and that because that that would theoretically accomplish their mission, and that would be to incite the Tea Party people into all kind of hysterical agreement with the guy.
Arrest Bush.
That's uh that's a direct uh front face provocation.
And everybody at Tea Party's looking out for this stuff today.
It doesn't appear, now if we're still early in the day, we have to admit this.
It doesn't appear yet that there have been a whole lot of news making infiltrators at these uh at these Tea Party events, but that doesn't mean it won't happen.
And remember, it doesn't have to happen to be reported.
We've learned that.
There were no racial epithets thrown at black congressmen walking to the Capitol on Obamacare Sunday, and yet it happened.
It was reported as though it happened.
So keep a sharp eye.
I gotta go before I go.
Carbonite.com.
Told you about Carbonite Pro yesterday.
That's for your small business.
All of your office computers on one account and one bill.
If you don't want to go that way, Carbonite standard is for you.
You do not want to lose what's on your hard drive.
As more and more people use computers more and more, especially people that are that are not computer files and not techno geeks.
They're putting more and more things on the hard drive because it's easy to do.
What happens when the hard drive bombs out?
And trust me, do not doubt me, it will happen.
Happens to everybody.
Well, that's why every computer I have except my laptop has four hard drives.
Plus, I back up with carbonite off-site.
You can't back up too much.
You can't back up too often.
With carbonite, you back up all the time.
You're backing up online, off-site, every time you're connected to the internet, and you don't even see it happen.
You'll forget that it's happening until your hard drive bombs out on you, or you know, the kid spills some milk in it or somebody steals it, and then you'll get a new computer, new hard drive, and you're gonna restore.
You can only restore if you've backed up.
Carbonite.com, fifty-five dollars a year for your Mac or PC, and a fifteen-day free trial with the offer code Rush.
And two free months if you decide to buy.
So it won't cost you fifty-five dollars a year at Carbonite.com if you use my name.
My name opens doors in a host of places, and in some places will get the door slammed in your face, but not at Carbonite.
Carbonite.com.
Back it up and get it back.
Well, there's Obama down there, Cape Canaveral, speaking to 200 people in the Orion Building.
I wonder if they let any workers in there.
Wonder if Obama found out that there aren't any workers in there, and he made sure that some workers got in There because that's who he was gonna go talk to is the workers.
He's not gonna talk to the workers.
They're mad as they can be.
They're getting canned because he has policies.
The workers aren't being permitted in there on purpose.
Michael Bloomberg, mad at the regime, says these attacks on Wall Street are hurting New York City.
His ad campaign, the Democrat Party uh effort here to run against Wall Street, not good.
No different than if the Democrats are running against oil in Texas.