All Episodes
Previous Next
April 15, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:26
April 15, 2010, Thursday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
With a few exceptions, have you noticed the contempt for all of these Tea Party people all over the country today?
You know, whenever the You know, anti-capitalist uh anti-growth people, the anarchists get out there and protest, or whenever unions protest, or gay rights activists protests, or civil rights, oh, they're great citizens.
We must listen to them.
We must understand what it is about them that has them outraged.
They're minorities.
But the Tea Party, there is veritable contempt for them as people and as for an organization.
That means, ladies and gentlemen, that the uh state controlled media commentary and the Democrat Party are scared.
They've got their state-controlled media running around doing polls to find out just who are these people.
Who are these Americans?
Who they think they are?
The New York Times has done a great job of uncovering the mysteries behind the Tea Party people.
Greetings, folks.
L. Rushball behind the golden EIB microphone, serving humanity.
How you ask?
Simply by being here.
Telephone number 800-282-2882 and the email address, Ill Rushbow at EIBNet.com.
Before we get to that, do you realize practically all of Western Europe is shut down in terms of airports because of a giant cloud of volcanic ash.
A glacier in uh in uh Iceland opened up, and volcano, the plume of of of uh of ash, thousands and thousands and thousands of feet tall, visibility problems.
If the ash gets in an engine, and jet engines are like giant vacuum cleaners.
I heard I heard one educated drive-by guy today say, yeah, you know what?
The engine could fail.
And then the airplane could go down.
Uh, as though they were two separate things.
And I just I watch this and I marvel at this because here you have the earth is burping.
The earth is belching, and there is more pollution been thrown into the sky over Western Europe today than all of the pollution emitted by every automobile owned, operated, and driven since they were invented.
And this is uh you can say the same thing about Mount Pinatubo over in the Philippines when interrupted.
But I can't recall a hurry the volcano that shut down thousands of flights for 24 hours, thousands of flights.
If you're trying to get to Western Europe today, you can't make it.
And if you're over there trying to get out of there today, you're stuck.
They're not letting any, particularly not letting Scandinavia, Norway, Great Britain, Ireland, France, uh, all the airports, not just the big commercial airports, they're all they're all shut down here.
Smoke and steam, uh, ash clouds from Iceland spewing volcano disrupted air traffic across northern Europe on Thursday, Western Europe as well, too.
Uh, as authorities closed British and Nordic airspace, shut down Europe's busiest airport at Heathrow and canceled now thousands of flights.
And we didn't do it, folks.
We're sitting here minding our own business.
How long before man-made global warming will be blamed for this?
Because of course it's Iceland, and maybe the ice is melting, and oh no, we maybe we did cause this.
It's gonna cool things down, too.
Um, you know, the earth is suicidal.
The earth doesn't like does not apparently like what's going on here.
Uh how long before Hugo Chavez blames the United States for this, and then how long before Barack Obama agrees with Chavez?
All right, New York Times, Kate Cernicky, Megan the Brennan.
That's hyphenated.
Uh poll finds Tea Party backers wealthier and more educated.
Tea Party supporters are wealthier, more well educated than the general public.
And they are held in great contempt, of course, by the political class.
They are no more or less afraid of falling into a lower socioeconomic class, according to the latest New York Times CBS News poll.
18% Of Americans who identify themselves as Tea Party supporters tend to be Republican, tend to be white, tend to be male, tend to be married, tend to be older than 45.
Does anybody doubt that there might have been a prejudice going into this poll because those results fit exactly what the state-controlled media and the regime think of the Tea Party people?
White Southern hicks who do have some education, and they're over 45.
They hold more conservative views on a range of issues than Republicans generally.
They are also more likely to describe themselves as very conservative and to describe the regime as very liberal.
And while most Republicans say they are dissatisfied with Washington, Tea Party supporters are more likely to classify themselves as angry.
Okay.
So let's stop there and review.
The Tea Party supporters are rich.
They are white.
Except there was a black Tea Party guy, and he held up a sign.
Look, look, it's a black Tea Partyer.
Was in Boston.
So review.
The Tea Party supporters are rich, they are white, they are male, and they of course are angry.
Oh, and they are just 18% of the general population, so they can be uh categorized now as fringe.
The fringe of the lunatic fringe.
Well, that's that's what CBS and the New York Times poll will allow the rest of the drive-by's to say.
18%?
Of course, Rasmussen has it far greater than that, that they represent 48% of the American.
More people identify with a Tea Party now than identify with Obama.
In the Rasmussen poll.
Their responses are like the general publics in many ways.
Most describe the amount they paid in taxes this year as fair.
Oh, really?
Most of the Tea Party people say the taxes they paid were fair.
Why then does the Tea Party name stand for taxed enough already?
That's what the TEA is.
Okay, so they're a bunch of fringe kook racists, wealthier than average people and they're white, but they think that their um their tax burden is fair.
Does any of this go together?
Well, I mean, who can doubt this poll, folks?
We believe this, obviously, right?
They actually are just as likely as Americans as a whole to have returned their census forms, though some conservative leaders have urged a boycott.
Who is urging a boycott?
Who is urging a boycott of the census?
I don't know of anybody urging a boycott of the census.
I don't know if anybody urging a boycott of the community, uh, whatever it is, survey.
Uh Tea Party supporters fierce animosity toward Washington and the president in particular is rooted in deep pessimism about the direction of the country and the conviction that the policies of the object.
You know what's amazing about this to me is that they had to do a survey to discuss this or discover this.
Anybody with half a brain, anybody able to think outside their own box, anybody to think outside their own narrative should be able to understand why people who are upset with the direction of the country are upset.
Nobody likes hard large deficits, nobody likes irresponsible spending, nobody likes the daily encroachment of freedom, nobody likes this huge expansion of government.
What is it that required these people at the New York Times and CBS to take a poll to figure out who the Tea Party people are and what it is that upsets them?
Tea Party supporters fierce animosity toward Washington and the president in particular is rooted in deep pessimism about the direction of the country and the conviction that the policies of the regime are disproportionately directed at helping the poor rather than the middle class or the rich.
That is flat out BS.
These people are worried about every American.
They're worried about every American and every American's kids.
To say that this is typical, ladies and gentlemen.
So, in other words, the Tea Partiers uh they oppose social justice, you see.
So that that's what the code word here is.
They oppose social justice, and that is uh uh equating things economically for all peoples.
The problem with the left and their way of equating People is they don't raise anybody, they don't elevate anybody.
They take the people of the higher levels of achievement income and they take away from them, and they make everybody equal as in equally miserable.
And if you if you're opposed to social justice, then it naturally follows that you are racist.
People think that the uh policies of the regime are disproportionately directed at helping the poor rather than the middle class or the rich.
What the Tea Party people realize, and what the vast majority of the American people realize is that this is a regime that is happy to preside over an America for the first time in her life in decline.
Uh these people care about their country.
They love their country and everybody in it.
The thing that the New York Times will never understand, Obama will never understand.
Tea parties, conservatives want the best for everybody.
We love everybody.
We realize who it is that makes this a great nation and who makes this country work.
And it ain't the political class, and it isn't the academic class.
It's the people toiling away, pursuing excellence, seeking their dreams, trying to do whatever they have to do to be the best they can be.
Some are muddling through.
Not everybody is pursuing excellence.
But the people who care enough to go out and be part of these tea parties, and many of these people have done doing this for the first time in their lives.
They're not professional organizers, agitators, protesters.
They're not part of a retomob.
They genuinely fear for the future of the country.
They know that America is hanging by a thread.
And they fear for the country, not just themselves.
The overwhelming majority of supporters say that the regime does not share the values most Americans live by, and that uh Obama does not understand the problems of people like them.
More than half the policies of the regime favor the poor.
25% think the regime favors blacks over whites compared with 11% of the general public.
Ah, see, so 25% think that there's a racial bias on the part of the regime, and that's going to make them racist.
75% do not think it.
But 25% get to report aha!
See!
See, it's even larger than in the general population.
That means that these old rich white people are racists.
That's what they're trying to set up here.
They are more likely than the general public and Republicans to say that too much has been made of the problems facing black.
Now, I don't know of one racial component of any aspect of the Tea Party, do you?
It didn't start on any level.
It had nothing to do, its roots had nothing to do with racism.
So once again, we have the template, we have the narrative, we have the prejudice, we have the bias of the CBS New York Times polling unit to go out and ask these questions.
Do you think these Tea Party people would volunteer any of these answers if they were multiple choice, open-ended, or whatever not multiple choice, if it were essay or open-ended?
The Tea Party's not about racism.
The Tea Party conservatism is not about racism.
It's all about saving America for everybody.
Just to make sure you didn't miss the earlier evidence that they are racist.
The Times spells it out in black and white.
Tea parties are more likely than the general public and Republicans to say that too much has been made of the problems facing black people.
We don't know how many infiltrators were polled.
Uh we didn't know, and we don't know why or how the Times defines wealthier.
We don't know what the benchmarks are.
We don't know what that means.
But we do have this, David Rodham Gergen last night on CNN, the Situation Room with Wolf Blitz.
And uh blitz says you had a chance to go out there in Boston and sort of sample the opinion of what was going on.
What did you discover, Mr. Gergen?
What I found very striking that we we hear a lot in the press about how angry the Tea Party folks are.
This actually was a very festive air.
It was almost like going to a state fair or something.
People were milling around, but they were talking in jovial ways.
What I also found, Wolf, was at these Tea Party events, They're not only strong supporters, and they're very intense.
They like to carry a lot of signs, but no racism, by the way.
No hints of it.
I must tell you that uh here in one of the most liberal states in the country, to have a crowd of 5,000 plus, you have to take this into account as something that's a serious part of our politics.
It's more than 5,000 people, I think 13 to 16,000.
But there is no racism.
But why you see the assumption?
The assumption is that there is racism.
Burns me.
All throughout conservatism, racism.
And so it's just assumed that it's and it's a big shock.
Big shock.
David Rodham Gurgen points out, thankfully so, that oh, by the way, no racism.
No hints of it, but in fact, people are very festive.
So this poll in the New York Times obviously was massaged until it said what the Times wanted it to say.
All of it means, all of it means that they are petrified.
They are because they do understand, they don't need to take a poll to understand what's going on.
They know full well who the Tea Party people are, and they know full well that they are representative of the vast majority of people who oppose every Obama agenda item.
They know full well who we are.
Quick time out, my friends, back after this.
On the cutting edge of societal evolution, Rush Limbaugh, half my brain, tied behind my back just to make it fair.
So Obama, Obama now putting on his ambulance chaser hat.
He's gonna send inspectors to all these troubled minds.
Always going in to get the credit for compassion after whatever disaster takes place.
Here he is this morning in Washington, D.C. in the Rose Garden.
This tragedy was triggered by a failure at the Upper Brig Branch Mine.
A failure first and foremost of management, but also a failure of oversight and a failure of laws so riddled with loopholes that they allow unsafe conditions to continue.
Owners responsible for conditions in the upper brig branch mines should be held accountable for decisions they made and preventive measures they failed to take.
And I've asked Secretary Solis to work with the Justice Department to ensure that every tool in the federal government is available in this investigation.
Oh, so there were new regulations put into place after the Sago disaster, but somehow there were loopholes in there.
And uh so this is code word, Bush didn't handle it.
I got I gotta go in there, I gotta save the day now.
Um if it happens on his watch, it happens on his watch, he constantly acts.
He's not like he's not in charge of the government.
It happened on his watch.
He's got a big national labor relations board guy in there.
Here's another, and notice has to beat up here on the um uh greedy Republican capitalist mine owner.
Here's the second bite.
Stronger mind safety laws were passed in 2006 after the Sago Mine disaster.
But safety violators like Massey have still been able to find ways to put their bottom line before the safety of their workers, filing endless appeals instead of paying fines and fixing safety problems.
To help ensure that mine companies no longer use a strategy of endless litigation to evade their responsibilities, we need to tackle the backlog of cases at the Mine Safety and Health Review Commission.
Oh, lawsuits are a bad thing now.
Lawsuits are a bad thing.
So here he goes again, assessing liability from the Oval Office, just like he did with the Cambridge Cops and Professor Gates, Skip Gates, good friend of his, uh, this is all part of the regime's plan, paint themselves as the compassionate entity here.
And once again, the private sector just can't be relied on.
The private sector doesn't care about people.
The private sector doesn't care about anybody but profit, and we are going to wipe it out.
By the way, about the the Tea Party, remember the uh politico had a story back on March 26, face of the Tea Party is female.
Many of the Tea Party's most influential grassroots and national leaders are women, and a new poll released this week by Quinnipia suggests that women might make up a majority of the movement as well.
But Tea Party organizers and activists say they've seen the influence of women firsthand.
So make up your minds out there.
New York Times, old, rich, white guys, wealthier, or is the political right where it's dominated by women?
I wonder, you know, back on on Obamacare Sunday, when the House passed the bill, there was also an immigration rights protest at the same time.
Why didn't the New York Times go in there and do a survey to find out who those people are?
Why don't we get polls of illegal alien rallies?
Or the Daily Coast rallies, or any of these upshot leftist rallies to find out who these people are, because they're not interested in finding out who they are.
They are already decent Americans.
These are people whose outrage is something we should get to know and understand.
We should we should they are minorities, and that's why they have justification in anything they do in these protests.
I will bet you that the Schulzberger family, which still controls the New York Times.
I'll bet you it's whiter.
And I will bet you it's richer than the Tea Party ralliers.
I'm just guessing.
I'm just guessing.
But I would bet the Schultzberger family has a lot more wealth and a lot more white people as a percentage than the Tea Party people do.
I will bet the lineup of hosts on MSNBC are whiter and richer than the Tea Party ralliers.
Last time I checked, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reed are whiter and richer than the Tea Party ralliers.
By far, in both cases, we're talking multi-multimillionaires.
And you notice they are never besmirched.
They are never impugned because of their race and their wealth.
And the New York Times just gave its CEO a massive bonus in the midst of layoffs, firings, and uh reductions in profit.
Oh, President Obama.
You forgot to mention anything about the unions in these mine disasters.
Where are they looking out for their members?
Hammerback Rush Limbaugh behind the golden EIB microphone, so I checked the email during the break.
And a bunch of people, hey Rush, was no union at that mine, at that massey mine, there were no union blank and ship kept a union out of there.
You can't blame the union for it.
The left are trying to blame the massey disaster on its union busting, in fact.
But um in 2009, the National Labor Relations Board agreed with the decision that massey energy rehire 85 coal miners who said they had been discriminated against because they were union members.
So there were union workers there, and so the United Mine workers should have been overseeing their safety.
United Mine Workers of America.
There were union workers at that mine.
Now the left is trying to say, you can't say that limb, why there is a non-union shop, that SOB CEO got rid of all the No, no, he agreed to bring back 85 of them.
So, you know, you people, i it's been 21 years.
At some point you are going to learn.
If you go up against me on a challenge of fact, you are going to be wrong.
Just that simple.
New jobless claims have surged in the latest week.
Jobs are still hard to land despite signs of recovery in other parts of the economy.
And as usual, the number of newly laid off people signing up for unemployment benefits rose sharply for the second straight week, suggesting that jobs are still hard to come by even as the economic recovery gains traction.
It marked the second week that claims took an unexpected leap.
In the prior week, claims rose by 18,000 to 460,000.
They rose by 24,000 last week to 484,000.
A government analyst cautioned against reading too much into both weeks' figures, saying that they were clouded by seasonal adjustments and difficulties related to the Easter holiday, which falls on all really.
First off its blizzards, then it's snow, then it's wind, and it's rain, then it's mud, and now Easter.
Easter clogs up the hiring process, don't you say?
Flat out amazing.
Actually, Uh there's another story, a little companion story from the state-controlled Associated Press, a number, record number of U.S. homes were lost to foreclosure in the first three months of this year.
A sign that banks are starting to wade through the backlog of troubled home loans at a faster pace.
What?
This is good news.
A record number of U.S. homes were lost to foreclosure, a sign that banks are starting to wade through the backlog of troubled home loans at a faster pace.
Foreclosures began to ease last year as banks came under pressure from the Obama regime to modify home loans for troubled borrowers.
In addition, some states enacted foreclosure moratoriums in hopes of giving homeowners behind in payments time to catch up.
In many cases, banks have had trouble coping with how to handle the glut of problem loans.
You think the surge in foreclosures might be related to the surge in jobless claims.
And as we hear about jobless claims and the unemployment rate, do keep in mind, folks, all the people who, and there are people who've run out of benefits.
And they don't have a job yet.
They no longer count.
It is um unexpected that layoffs would happen after health care is passed.
Why is this unexpected?
Everybody in the private sector has been waiting to find out just what's in store for them.
One of the things they were waiting on big time was Obamacare, find out what was going to happen.
And they found out it was passed.
And so there's more unemployment.
None of this is unexpected.
None of this is a surprise.
Any way, shape, manner, or form.
In case you missed this yesterday, Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman has canceled a hearing intended to grill CEOs who took a charge against profits because of the health care reform bill.
The cancellation came after they realized what everybody else knew that the companies were required to do what they did because of accounting rules.
Waxman and others had reacted with outrage and accused the companies of doing it to make health care reform look bad.
So he sent them a letter, the equivalent of a subpoena.
People like ATT, Verizon, John Deere, Caterpillar, you get your butts up here, you bring all your emails, and you bring all of your books.
And we want you to explain because Obamacare is supposed to lower costs.
Everybody knows that these costs are going to be lowered.
And you're just doing this to embarrass us and our brilliant young president.
And in somebody got hold of Waxman and said, Oh, Henry, uh two things, Henry.
They were required by law as uh SEC.
Uh, I've heard of Sarbanes Oxley, uh, they're required by law to do what they did, uh, Mr. Chairman.
And also, Mr. Chairman, you might want to rethink this, because these guys have the law on their side, and the last thing you want, Mr. Chairman, is for these people, these CEOs to come up here, uh, and have a national forum to explain how your regime is operating.
So they got to Waxman and they said, Look, you don't want these guys coming up here launching full barrel on you.
You don't want it because they're in the right, they're obeying the law, and they're gonna say you're nothing more than a bunch of harassers.
And they're gonna be right.
So Wack Waxman has sort of uh wimped out here and has decided to cancel the whole thing.
John Boehner put out a statement yesterday.
House Democrats cancel this hearing because they don't want to give America's employers a forum to tell the public how Obama's new health care law is already hurting the economy and hampering job creation.
Chairman Waxman thought he could intimidate businesses into keeping quiet about this new job-killing health care law, but when they call this bluff by continuing to speak out, he chose to pull the plug.
Amen.
Right on.
And then there's this.
This is not what Nancy Pelosi said, by the way.
From the government-run associated press, opposition to President Obama's health care law jumped after he signed it.
A clear indication his victory could become a liability for Democrats in this fall's elections.
Now wait a minute.
Pelosi said we're all going to love this bill once it's signed, because only then are we going to know what's in it.
And we learn what's in it, we're going to love it.
We're going to fall in love with it.
But opposition jumped after he signed it.
A new AP poll finds Americans oppose the health care remake 50 to 39%.
In other polls, it's even higher.
Before a divided Congress finally passed the bill, and Obama signed it at a jubilant White House ceremony, public opinion was about evenly split.
Another 10% of Americans say they are neutral.
Disapproval for Obama's handling of health care also increased 46% early March before he signed the bill.
52% currently, a level not seen since last summer's angry town hall meetings.
And this is why they are frightened as they can be of all of you in the Tea Party movement.
All of you going to the rallies today, they are scared to death.
They know you represent the mainstream.
They know that they are governing against the will of the people.
You are not lying down.
You are not turning tail and running.
You are not acting intimidated.
This is how they expect you to act, because this is how, for the most part, Republicans have acted in Washington.
But you aren't taking it.
And you're doing it, as David Rodham Gurgen said, in a festive way.
A brief timeout.
We'll get to your phone calls when we come back right after this.
By the way, folks, what all these stories on foreclosure, and they're all over the place.
I must have three or four stories on the foreclosures and how they are at a record high and how we're all upset.
Let me tell you what this is.
Coordinated effort from the White House.
Uh and then the highest, uh highest offices of the regime, all the way down to the state controlled media, because there is a there's gonna if it's not happened yet, what has happened, you again you're gonna notice it.
There is a big push to make the banks forgive the principal on mortgages, not the interest, but to forgive the principal.
That's where Obama's headed next.
And look at all of the with a financial regulatory reform bill that uh is lingering there in the Senate, it's past the House.
It's got even people like Jamie Dimon, uh, who's uh the JP Morgan Chase, you know, the I mean the the signal has been sent.
You are going to run the financial industry the way we want it to, or we are going to run it for you.
And so Obama's making a big push now for these banks and lenders to forgive the principal on the mortgage.
The banks say they can't afford to do it.
The question the banks are gonna face, can we afford not to do it if our only option is Obama coming in here and threatening to shut us down if this regulatory reform bill ever gets uh signed into law.
So we can't, we can't give the bank CEOs a national forum.
We know we're not dare gonna call hearings with those guys up there.
But Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his uh merry band of terrorists, oh yeah, you want a public forum, Sheikh?
Fine, we'll give you a $200 or $200 million a year trial in New York or wherever we can do it, and you can rail against this country for as long as it takes us to try you.
But we can't have any CEOs come up there and uh and give them a national forum uh in front of Waxman's committee about the costs associated with the new health care reform bill.
You know, bankers, bankers, far more evil than the biggest mass murderer of Americans in our nation's history, don't you understand that?
Bankers and CEOs, yeah, they're far more dangerous.
We can't let the country hear from them, but Khalid Sheikh Mohammed murdered 3,000 Americans.
Fine, bring him up, give him a trial.
America's the problem in the world, and we're gonna tell everybody that we know it.
And we're gonna let the people who think we're the problem in the world have a forum, and we're gonna pay them to let them run off at the mouth, and we're gonna hire their lawyers for them to boot, but let CEOs come up and tell how the health care bill is hurting.
Uh-uh, uh, let bank CEOs come up and explain why you really want us to just give away the principle on these mortgages.
We can't afford to do that.
Has there ever been such a thing?
Somebody help me out here.
Because I've we've been hearing this for a year.
There's gonna be a jobless recovery.
Has anybody ever heard of that before?
I have not either.
I have I have never heard of a jobless recovery.
I guess this is part of uh the new speak.
The new speak for Obama.
And the banks, the banks say, the banks say that well, if if you make us forgive the principal, that's gonna dry up credit completely.
I mean, if you make us forgive, we we can't loan to anybody if you do that, because then you're if they can't pay him back, you're gonna make us you're turning us into public utilities.
You're turning us into instruments of redistribution.
Which, by the way, is the objective.
And the banks, of course.
Wall Street.
That's the reason for the bad economy.
You heard little Timmy Geitner say so yesterday.
Uh you've heard others in the administration and the Democrat Party say that that's going to be their campaign technique.
Fort Hood.
You know, there's a report out on Fort Hood, the disaster.
Everybody missed what was right in front of their face.
You had a malcontent, you had somebody unstable, you had somebody that was was sending money off, he was consulting with Imam all the time.
Nobody had the guts to do anything about it.
Nobody this is actually in the report.
Nobody acted on what they because political correctness.
They are scared to death of acting when a certain set of circumstances is abundantly clear.
They're afraid of being bashed, creamed or what have you.
But look at this.
After Fort Hood, the nation turned to Obama, and it took him what, a couple days to come out and actually address this?
A couple hours.
The nation looked to President Obama for guidance.
What the hell happened, Mr. President?
Please tell us.
He could not bring himself to find terrorism or Muslim extremism after the Fort Hood shooting.
But look how quickly he can find fault with private sector mining.
The mines are regulated by the government.
It happened on his watch.
He gets to act as a spectator.
He gets to act as the giant man of compassion.
Now he's gonna go in and find out what happened here.
Undoubtedly we're gonna blame the fact that this guy got rid of unions.
When he didn't, there were 85 unionized workers.
He was forced to hire back.
Obama could not wait to blast the mine owner, but he will never blast the Fort Hood shooter.
The Fort Hood shooter, the entire incident was brushed under the rug.
Because you'll see, ladies and gentlemen, the regime is never at fault.
Private sector is always the villain.
The regime needs private sector villains, just like Chavez does, to pass regulations to seize even more control.
Who's up first?
This is Melissa, Cincinnati.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hello.
Hi.
Hi, I just had a couple comments to make about the poll.
Yes, ma'am.
Um they got a couple points wrong.
Well, most of them wrong.
I am not 40.
I'm not male.
I'm not wealthy.
Um I'm not white.
But I am angry.
Um, and I am conservative.
Wait a minute.
You're not 40.
You're not male.
You're you're female?
Yes.
Uh you're not wealthy.
No.
Uh, and you're not white.
No.
Mexican American, black, however, they want to say it when they do their polls.
Really?
You're African American.
Yes.
So you were and you're out there participating in a tea party.
Yes.
Wow.
Did uh anybody try to infiltrate your P their Tea Party?
Not that I'm sure of.
But I know that what you would have known if somebody was holding up a sign that was purely racist or bigoted, you would know it's an infiltrator.
Not that I've seen.
Well, okay.
I haven't seen any of them.
There weren't any infiltrators in Boston yesterday either.
No.
Our our event evening starts around four.
Oh, you haven't had yours yet.
No.
Oh.
Well, keep a sharp eye.
Yes.
I'm sure your uh your friends that you're going with, uh, you all are well informed about the attempts to discredit you.
I'll be bringing so they can see the uh political process the way it should be.
Um, but I've I've had like blood pressure rising arguments and discussions with friends and family who who don't just negate everything the Tea Party says, oh no, they're just white and they're disregarded.
They are the they are the closed-minded bigots.
Never forget them.
Back after this, don't go away.
Have you heard Pelosi's latest?
Democrat Congress has cut taxes by more than eight hundred billion dollars.
They are lawless and they are liars.
When's the last time you went to a baseball game, folks?
Are baseball fans racist?
Because ninety ninety percent of the people in the stands are white.
And they're pretty angry, too.
They get really mad when the umpires screw up.
Are they racists?
▲
Export Selection