All Episodes
Previous Next
April 5, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:35
April 5, 2010, Monday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Greetings and welcome back, Rush Lindbaugh, behind the Golden EIB microphone, meeting and surpassing all audience expectations every busy broadcast day.
A thrill and a delight to have you here.
Telephone number, if you want to be on the program, 800-282-2882, the email address lrushbaugh at EIBnet.com.
Does anybody know what the Tea Party actually stands for?
What does TEA, what does it stand for?
TEA stands for something.
What?
What?
I'll tell you in a minute what TEA stands for.
But first word is taxes.
It's about ending taxes.
Nevertheless, as you well know, the state-controlled media and the Obama regime and the Democrat Party are doing everything they can to discredit and to marginalize members of the Tea Party.
They are casting them as racists, old, angry white guys, a bunch of sexists, largely Southerners.
They shout the N-word.
They shout homosexual epithets at Barney Frank and so forth when none of this happened.
Nobody can document that it happened.
And all of these Congressional Black Caucus members, as we now know, were deliberately trying to provoke an incident on Obamacare Sunday by walking through the crowd, which was totally unnecessary.
And when they got inside the Capitol building, they said John Lewis, who a lot of people have had a lot of respect for, he was beaten up pretty badly in the Selma march, said he was called the N-word.
And a lot of people are genuinely surprised that John Lewis would sell out the civil rights movement in the process of lying about something that did not happen so as to compare health care, Obamacare, to the new, to the old civil rights and make it the new civil rights fight.
They don't have any new pages in the playbook.
They just have to go back to past pages.
And so the effort to demonize is wide open.
And the reason is that they are afraid of members of the Tea Party and what the Tea Party stands for.
These are sexists, by the way, who happen to love Sarah Palin, for example.
These are racists, by the way, who happen to love and respect Shelby Steele and Clarence Thomas and Thomas Sowell.
And it really is unconscionable what's being done to these people.
They know it full well.
And of course, the government-controlled media is right in there doing their bidding for them on this because the Tea Party people refuse to sit down and take it.
They refuse.
They have the audacity to dare protest the regime.
Regimes do not like to be protested.
Regimes don't put up with being protested.
And regimes target average citizens.
Presidents do not.
Regimes do.
Regimes lead the targeting of average citizens.
So I have three polls here today on just who the Tea Party people are.
Oh, by the way, I should remind you that John Lewis compared McCain to George Wallace during the campaign, during the presidential campaign.
I mean, that's just how far they've gone.
That's how desperate they are.
We have a poll here from the Hotline National Journal reporting, actually, it's the Winston Group, conducted three national surveys over the winter, one in December, one in January, February, to find out who the Tea Party members are and what drives them.
Over the course of the surveys, they found that more than half, 58%, identified themselves as Republicans, 28% claimed to be Independents, 13% Democrats, but 65% ideated themselves as conservatives.
26% said they were moderates.
Tea Partiers also skewed older and male.
Of those associated with the Tea Party, 56% were male compared to 48% of the electorate as a whole.
14% were between the ages of 18 and 34.
20% of all voters are under 35.
The headline of the story, Tea Party largely older, whiter, and male.
Do you think that we will ever see a headline that says NAACP largely older, blacker, and male?
Will we ever see that?
But the same could be said of the NAALCP, except in this case, it doesn't happen to be true.
That is not who the Tea Party people are.
There are other polls that differ tremendously from this.
One is from Gallup.
Tea Partiers are fairly mainstream in their demographics.
Tea Party supporters skew right politically, but demographically, they're generally representative of the public at large.
That's the finding of a USA Today Gallup poll conducted March 26th through the 28th, in which 28% of U.S. adults call themselves supporters of the Tea Party movement.
Tea Party supporters are decidedly Republican and conservative.
Also compared with average Americans, supporters are slightly, slightly more likely to be male and less likely to be lower income.
In several other respects, their age, educational background, employment status, and race, Tea Partiers are quite representative of the public at large.
That is from Gallup.
While opposition to the health care bill is perhaps the most distinctive characteristic of Tea Party supporters, their views on abortion are also notable.
Nearly two-thirds consider themselves pro-life, compared with 46% of all national adults.
We go to another poll reported at thehill.com.
Four in ten Tea Party members are Democrats or Independents.
That's a little bit different than the first poll that we heard.
And another poll says that largely the Tea Party is made up of women, not men.
So for as many polls as there are, there are that many descriptions of who the Tea Party people actually are.
Let me play you an audio soundbite from last Thursday on a syndicator radio show.
I don't know what the name of the show is, but the Representative Steve Cohen, a Democrat from Tennessee, was the guest.
And here was the question.
The pervasive feeling in Washington right now, all this vitriol, all this hate, what's being done in America about all this now?
What is this Tea Party?
Tea Party people are kind of like without robes and hoods.
They have really shown a very hardcore, angry side of America that is against any type of diversity.
And we saw opposition to African Americans, hostility toward gays, hostility to anybody who wasn't just a clone of George Wallace's fan club.
And I'm afraid they've taken over the Republican Party.
So another lie.
Mr. Cohen is lying through his teeth.
I think in a campaign, one of his own campaigns, his opponent referred to him as something close to a KKKer.
But there's, I mean, this is just absurd, folks.
It is, it is, it's like saying that the Tea Party is made up of radical Democrats because most of the KKK were radical Democrats, such as Robert Sheets Byrd, such as Bull Conner.
All of the old segregationists were Democrats.
All the KKK, the vast majority of them, were Southern Democrats.
It's amazing how history has done a complete 180 on all of this.
These Tea Party people are nothing like the KKK.
They are not racists or bigoted.
They're not homophobes.
They're none of these things.
They did not shout the N-word at John Lewis or anybody else or at the Reverend Jackson.
They didn't shout the F-word at Barney Frank.
These people wanted that to happen.
They made it up.
The original targets of the KKK were Republicans or blacks who might vote for them.
The KKK was in solidarity with Democrats because the Democrats were the segregationists.
J. William Fulbright, senator from Arkansas, Bill Clinton's mentor, he says, segregationist.
The history revision on this is pretty amazing.
KKK was founded to be the terrorist arm of the Democrat Party.
And now you have Democrats running around saying that some of the finest Americans, these are the people that make the country work, these are the people that want to save their country.
These are the people who understand full well that they are the targets of this regime.
These people understand full well that what this regime wants is a permanent underclass that has no upward mobility.
And the best way to get that is to pass a monstrous health care bill with massive taxes on everybody and high unemployment.
If you don't have a job, your mobility is nowhere other than downward.
The Democrats need a permanent underclass dependent on them for their power and their election.
And that's what healthcare is all about.
That's what most of the regime's agenda is all about.
This is really despicable what these people are doing.
Steve Cohen, Democrat from Tennessee.
The only thing different here is these people don't wear their white robes and their hoods.
Remember, the KKK was made up of Democrats.
It was founded to be the domestic terrorist arm of the Democrat Party.
Their original targets were Republicans or blacks who might vote for them.
And of course, blacks in general.
Never forget that.
Bull Connor, all of these people that John Lewis marched against, they were Democrats.
He's a Democrat now, lying about being called the N-word, all for the sake of the regime's agenda.
Back after this.
Okay, you realize the media tweak of the day happened mere moments ago when I said that the KKK was essentially the terrorist arm of the Democrat Party.
You think I invented that?
I didn't.
PBS.
Let me read to you from PBS.
They grudgingly acknowledged it on a show they did called The Rise and Fall of Jim Crow.
Dressed in robes and sheets, intended to prevent identification by the occupying federal troops and supposedly designed to frighten blacks.
The Klan quickly became a terrorist organization in service of the Democrat Party and white supremacy.
Between 1869 and 1871, its goal was to destroy congressional reconstruction by murdering blacks and some whites who were either active in Republican politics or educating black children.
PBS, KKK, became a terrorist organization in service of the Democrat Party.
Now, Politico today is the source that says women are the driving force of the Tea Party's, not men.
So these definitions or these explanations of just who comprised the Tea Party are all over the place.
But all of this is designed basically to discredit them and marginalize them.
It's exactly what I told Jonathan Martin over the weekend doing a story on this regime business.
He said, why do you think Obama called you out?
You think he's trying to marginalize you or do you think it's going to elevate you?
And I said, how can it possibly elevate me?
I'm already at the top of the mountain, placed there by the regime, shortly after they took office.
I said, I think what Obama's trying to do is distract me.
He's trying to get me to talking about me instead of talking about the regime's agenda.
And they're trying to discredit March.
This is what they do.
I said, you know, it's getting old, all of us here, Jonathan.
They don't debate us in the arena of ideas.
All they do is try to marginalize us, smear us, discredit us.
They describe us as, you know, demons and so forth and so on.
It really has gotten old.
Why does Chavez call out his opponents?
Does Chavez call out his opponents to elevate them?
Hugo Chavez.
Oh, and how about this?
Obama announces that we're going to unilaterally get rid of one-third of our nukes.
And the next thing we know, there's Vladimir Putin down in Caracas meeting with Chavez to help him get nuclear power and selling him nuclear or combat weapons.
Back to the phones, James in Las Vegas.
Glad you called, sir.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hi, Rush.
Government-assisted unemployed Vegas dittos to you.
Thank you, sir.
I'm a Democrat like my father before me.
But I was so embarrassed after the election that I thought of registering as an independent or even a Republican.
But after seeing what this administration has done over the first six months, I was scared in fear of reprisals.
So I just want to comment on your comment about being a regime.
It's pretty crazy out there.
But I don't think Obama is ruining the economy on purpose.
I think he feels that our economy is consumer-based, and it doesn't matter if he's redistributing the wealth.
He's creating more consumers from poor people.
You know, poor people will have more money to spend, and those poor people will usually buy from small businesses, and that'll help small business and keep corporations stagnant.
Well, what is that?
If you keep a corporation stagnant, if you make the small business rely on the poor, I mean, nobody ever got a job from the poor.
Nobody ever made a profit off of the poor by definition.
And that's not to rip the poor.
This man is, I think you've made your own case the opposite.
You have just given us another of many explanations of how he is doing it on purpose.
I mean, if you're going to say that his express purpose is to redistribute wealth, to stagnate corporations, and to build up small businesses by giving the poor more money, if you're going to stagnate anything, you're doing it on purpose.
What he needs to do out there, James, and you've got to really believe this, don't doubt me.
What's going on is the creation of a permanent underclass that has no upward mobility whatsoever.
That way they never leave the throes of the Democrat Party.
Never.
Chris, Germantown, New York, great to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Megadittos, Ruff.
Thank you.
First-time listener, first-time caller.
Yeah, right to the point.
I'm fed up with this whole healthcare bit.
You know, I've been working pretty much my whole life, and I was raised under the belief that the harder I work, the more I get out of it.
And it just doesn't seem that way.
You know, me and my wife invested in her own company, which she started from the ground up.
And they want to continue to take more money from us to give it to people that don't work, who don't want to try to excel, who don't want to actually get up and go out and do something.
Now, why?
Why do you think that's a very interesting point, probably very true?
Why?
Why don't they want to do it?
Why do they want to do it?
Why do they want to take money from people who work and give it to people who don't?
Because they're the ones making the money.
Without the common worker actually going out to make the dollar, there's no way for them to get that money.
And they want to keep me from being able and people like me to being able to go out and make the money and become our own entrepreneurs.
Yeah, but why?
So we can be dependent on them.
Well, not so much you, although it'd be helpful.
But if you're going to give people money for doing nothing for it, well, they're going to love you forever.
And they're never going to feel the need to go work themselves, i.e., you have the creation of a permanent underclass.
Absolutely.
You have just described what Obama's doing, returning the nation's wealth to its quote-unquote rightful owners.
Obama thinks this country is a crime.
Obama thinks this country is a walking, living crime, the way it's treated poor people, minorities, and so forth.
And he wants to get even.
He wants to get even with all the people who have engaged in this theft, discrimination, racism, and so forth.
And he also wants to create a permanent underclass for the express purpose of making sure he's never out of office or the regime's party is never out of office.
Don't doubt me on this, folks.
Don't doubt me.
It's all about him.
It's all about the regime.
It's all about their party.
It's all about their future.
You know, wouldn't it be nice if you went to the doctor, he told you to take care of yourself, take vitamins, do exercise, eat the right thing?
And if you did that, he would guarantee your health insurance in cases of catastrophic health problems with no out-of-pocket expense for life.
Well, we know that's not going to happen.
We know it can't happen.
But it can happen with your car.
When it comes to your car, BG Products does offer free lifetime protection from catastrophic failure of your engine, your transmission, driveline, power steering, and brake systems for the life of your car, even if you sell it.
Now, if you have an oil change already scheduled, call the place where you have the appointment and make sure they have the BG oil service.
And if they don't, cancel the service and take your car to a shop that does the BG oil service.
You can't do it yourself.
This is very sophisticated stuff.
It takes intricate equipment to do this.
That's why you can't go buy it yourself.
BG Oil Service is available only at 17,000 dealerships and service shops nationwide.
And there's an easy way to find the one nearest you.
They have a website, bgfindashop.com.
Just go there.
I know it sounds strange.
The best product in its category, you can't buy it directly.
But the reason is it's so sophisticated, you would screw it up.
Professionals have to do it.
Snerdley just asked me if the Tiger Humiliation Tour is over after this.
I haven't been able to catch much of this, and I didn't want to join it in progress for any of it.
It's been pretty somber.
I haven't been able to judge much of it just from listening to it a couple seconds.
So I'll have to wait.
I know we're rolling on it if there's anything interesting to come out of it.
I don't know what the questions have been like, but we're going to deal with all that, Snerdly, when it happens, if it's worthwhile.
But I don't think we're anywhere near the end of the rehab tour.
Nowhere near it.
This is the beginning of it, Snerdley.
But you don't have to watch it.
When did you watch golf?
When have you ever watched golf?
You don't care about golf.
You know, you're going to watch, okay, so you want to watch Tiger play the Masters, but you're tired of the rehab tour.
Well, you've got to put up with a rehab tour if you're going to watch the Masters.
It's just that simple.
Folks, our country, our economy, don't doubt me on this.
Our economy is based on capitalism.
Obama's reason, his stated reason for being inspired by Reverend Wright was his speech, White Man's Greed Runs a World in Need.
That inspired Obama.
White man's greed runs a world in need.
That's the real American dream.
Working hard, you will get ahead.
But you can't have that if you want to create a permanent underclass.
You simply cannot have people getting ahead.
It destroys the whole notion of a permanent underclass.
By the way, the Rasmussen people have done a poll on major issues of, well, major issues.
48% of voters say that the average Tea Party member is closer to their views than is Obama.
How about that?
48% of voters say the average Tea Party member is closer to their views than President Barack Obama.
We are nowhere near surrendering this country, Snerdley.
Nowhere near surrendering it.
Any way, shape, manner, or form.
This is amazing.
Some places we've already lost.
San Francisco is one of them.
There's a story here in the San Francisco Chronicle: housing protest leads to takeover of duplex.
And there's a picture here of some guy from a group called Homes, Not Jails.
He is hanging banners at a privately owned vacant duplex on San Jose Street in the Mission District.
And the signs, the banner say, take what you need, live by what you desire.
They don't own this.
They've gone in and just taken it over.
A group of homeless people and housing activists took over a privately owned Mission District duplex on Sunday in what served as the climax of a protest designed to promote use of San Francisco's vacant buildings as shelters for the needy.
But the owner of the property, who was targeted over his eviction of a tenant, said the demonstration was nothing more than breaking and entering.
The takeover epitomized the tensions between property owners and tenant activists that have flared for decades in San Francisco and sometimes tip into outright hostilities near the peaks and troughs of the market cycle.
The cops were there and didn't do anything.
They just stood there and watched.
And toward the end of the day, all but one of the police left, according to this story.
Nothing other than my property was apparently broken into, said the owner.
Nothing other than my property.
They stood around and they didn't do anything about it.
Laguna Nigal, California, and Pam, I'm glad you called.
You're on the EIB network.
Hello.
Good afternoon, Rush.
How are you doing?
Fine and dandy.
Thank you.
Oh, good.
Listen, I was just, I don't have a big political comment to make per se, but I just wanted to share just a little of yesterday afternoon's Easter dinner with family with you.
I'm afraid I got raked over the coals.
First of all, I'm a former nun.
And so after dinner, everybody was sitting around the table talking, you know, just that normal, benign chitter chat.
And so one of the girls, women there, asked me, they were talking about, well, who would you like to welt with your, who would be your fantasy, you know, dinner date and all that sort of thing?
And they jokingly, they know I don't go out.
I've only been out of the convent now for seven months, six months, excuse me.
And I just said, well, I would like to go out with Rush Limbaugh.
And you could have heard a pin drop in that frigging room.
Everybody's head just snapped around, and I felt like I just lost my salvation, for God's sake.
And I thought, you know, I said, well, I go, what?
I think Rush would be a lovely dinner date.
I think the conversation would be sparkling.
And I said, he just sounds like he'd give a great hug.
I said, I just love his tone of voice.
So anyway, I have a lot of people not talking to me now, just because I said you would be a wonderful person to go out with and how much I enjoy listening to your program.
It's helping me to get regrounded politically and to know of what's going on.
So I've hit the ground running.
Boy, you're talking about a conversion.
Yeah.
I mean, this is a conversion from the convent to the EIB network.
Yes, sir.
Did you say these are family members?
Yes, it was a family Easter dinner yesterday.
Oh, my God.
It's your family?
Yeah, yeah.
Nobody knew that I listened to you.
I didn't know it was any big deal.
But they're also left-wing Democrats.
Oh, my gosh.
I just thought I turned 10 shades of red.
And I just thought, I could just feel everybody kind of lean back away from me.
And I thought, well, crap.
Well, what did they ultimately say?
They had to ultimately say something.
Just they were still, well, one girl said, you would listen to Rush?
And I said, yes.
And she goes, how could you?
How could you?
How could you listen to that?
The question is, how can you not?
I know.
That's why I said, he's been getting me back in touch with everything.
And I said, I can tell he is telling the truth.
I can hear it in his voice.
He's all this stuff.
Did you ever listen to me, Pam?
Not that I know of.
Well, I mean, this is typical.
This is very, very typical.
And so they're not talking to you today.
No.
No.
I haven't heard from any of them.
Actually, I left early because I couldn't stand it anymore.
The silence.
They started talking among themselves, and I felt very put down.
So family, did they ever get around to blaming me for you leaving the church?
No, no.
That's coming.
Oh, my God.
Well, let's do this.
What are the first names of your family members in Laguna Nigel?
Valerie.
Valerie?
Janice.
Janice.
And Richard.
Richard.
Oh, there's a guy wimp in here, too, okay?
Yeah.
Mm-hmm.
Yeah.
So how old were you?
Give me an age range so that people who know, because there could be a million Valeries out there in Southern California.
Correct.
They're all in their 40s, 50s.
That's our age range in here.
For those of you in the Laguna, Niguel, if you know of Valerie and a Janice and a Richard in the 40 to 50 age range, the odds are they're a bunch of closed-minded bigots.
Amen.
Yeah.
Unbelievable.
Well, I always come to the defense of people who engage in the great risk of listening to this program.
Yeah.
Oh, I'm proud of it.
Proud of it.
Well, you ought to tell them that you called and that we talked about them.
Send them an email.
Do you email?
Yes.
Yeah, good.
That way you have to actually talk to them.
You send them an email.
Tell them I said hello.
I will indeed.
Thanks for the call.
I love stories like this.
I really do.
Pam, thank you so much.
You're welcome, my dear.
Goodbye.
Well, do you have more to say?
No, no, no.
If you have more to say, feel free.
Oh, that's okay to say.
Oh, I thought you said, I hear a goodbye, like you thought I was dumping you.
But you said, no, my dear goodbye.
My dear goodbye, yes.
I'm sorry, I'm so used to saying that, my dear, to people.
I didn't mean to sound patronizing, but no.
One question.
I really don't want to embarrass you, but I'm fascinated by something here.
Sure, go right ahead.
In the convent, did you use the word frigging ever?
No.
Actually, I heard Sister Paula say the S word one time.
She was removing a tray of bread.
She makes the most wonderful brown bread and was speaking it out of the oven, and the edge of her pan caught the edge of the oven door, and it went flying.
And I never heard anybody announce the S word so profoundly in my life.
That startled me.
That's, I think, the worst word I'd heard when I was, actually, I was in a monastery.
I wasn't in a regular convent.
I was in a monastic order.
So we weren't allowed to, we could only speak two hours a day.
We observed grand silence.
And then there was a 10-foot wall that went around the perimeter, so we could never leave the grounds.
So only speak for two hours a day.
You've never heard 19 women talk so much in your whole life.
Let me tell you something.
The other 22 hours would be heaven.
Well, Obama showed up at the Washington Nationals today to throw out the first pitch.
You know, I haven't watched the final four, but I got so many emails on Saturday night from people.
Come on, we're trying to watch basketball.
They go to Obama at halftime for an interview.
Can we get away from this guy for just one day of the weekend?
No, you can't.
He's out there throwing the first pitch today.
Apparently, he got roundly booed.
He did get the ball to the plate this year.
Yeah, he looks, I mean, awful.
He looks like a girl out there.
You know, Castro could at least throw a baseball.
I mean, in a lot of ways, the leader of this regime is embarrassing the leaders of other regimes like it.
He's a girly man.
The way he throws the baseball, it's embarrassing.
He got booed out there.
The government-controlled AP said he received a loud ovation from the packed crowd with a few booze scattered in.
AP's trying to put lipstick on a pig here.
Anybody that heard this, I mean, it's very, very clear that he was resoundingly booed out there.
No question about it.
Now, let's see.
Oh, how much is your computer worth?
I got a question.
Very simple question.
How much is your computer worth?
Now, whatever you've said to yourself, answer that question when you consider the following.
How much are your family photos worth to you?
How much are your personal and work files worth?
How much is the doctoral thesis or term paper you're working on worth to you?
Now, ask yourself how much you would pay to get all that back if somebody stole it.
Well, it's the same thing when your computer fries, when your hard drive goes, it's the same thing as having somebody stole it because it's gone.
And if you're not backed up, you can't restore it.
You can't get it back.
And it happens to everybody at some point in their life with a computer, sometimes multiple times.
And you've got to be able to back up and therefore restore what you lose.
Carbonite is the simplest way to do this.
Safely, securely, automatically backs up your hard drive off-site whenever you are connected to the internet.
It happens in the background.
You'll never see it happening.
You get all of that for $55 a year.
Restoring your files is also simple, a few single steps.
And $55 a year is actually what it won't cost you if you use offer code Rush, because then you get a 15-day genuine free trial and two free months if you decide to buy.
So if you said your computer is worth whatever you paid for it, you put your valuable documents and pictures on it and it becomes priceless.
And if you lose them, they're gone.
Don't take the chance.
Carbonite.com.
Video, i.e., for us, audio, of Michelle Obama has surfaced.
Audio from 2008, August of that year in Denver at a luncheon for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender delegates to the Democrat National Convention.
There are others.
Anyway, here is a portion of what she said, and this is causing quite a stir out there.
Iraq has led by example.
When we took our trip to Africa and visited his home country in Kenya, we took a public HIV test for the very point of showing folks in Kenya that there is nothing to be embarrassed about in getting tested.
And we did it as a couple.
Right now, right now, right now, right on, right on.
So she called Kenya her husband's home country.
So, you know, this is reverberating all over the place out there.
Here's a soundbite from Tiger, by the way.
Question: Do you still feel the same way about the pursuit of Jack Nicholas records, winning golf tournaments, or does that have to take a different perspective now considering what's happened to you?
What I've done here, it puts in perspective, is that it's not about the championships, it's about how you live your life.
And I hadn't done that the right way for a while, and I needed to change that.
And going forward, I need to be a better man going forward than I was before.
And just because I've gone through treatment doesn't mean it stops.
I'm trying as hard as I possibly can each and every day to get my life better and better and stronger.
And if I win championships along the way, so be it.
Now, some people are going to interpret this as Tiger said to hell with Jack Nicholas, to hell with winning championships.
If that happens, so be it.
If people believe this, what he's basically saying here is that now I've got a whole different focus.
Quickly, Morris County, New Jersey.
And I'm glad you waited.
You're on the EIB network, sir.
Hello.
Hey, thanks for taking my call.
I just wanted to talk a little bit about this regime word you're using.
And I get a kick out of the whole weekend, almost five full days of the mainstream media having angst about using this word.
And in the process of doing that, they're talking about, oh, he must be trying to relate Obama to a communist regime.
And they miss a point.
I think he's more like the Nazi regime and the fact that he wants to leave the world with the perception that America's industry is privately owned.
But the truth is he wants to really control what they make, how much of it they make, how much they charge for it, and who they hire to do the work.
And I want to say that.
be more like Mussolini.
That'd be more like fascism than Nazism.
But when I used it, I was not thinking of Hitler when I said regime.
I'm thinking of Edi Amin Dada.
I'm thinking of Hugo Chavez, you know, Fidel Castro, governing against the will of the people.
In fact, Obama doesn't even govern.
He looks at himself as a ruler.
If you really understand that about Obama, then everything else falls into place.
He is a ruler, and regimes rule.
Back after this.
All right, we didn't, yeah, we didn't have a chance to get to answers today to the question I posed on, is it too late for America?
Should we repeal?
Or is it a worthless effort?
I asked you what you thought.
I never do this.
You know, what I think is what matters on this show.
But I put that out there, and we had a full boat of calls, so I'm going to run this over to tomorrow.
And we'll get some calls from you tomorrow on what you think the status of the country is.
▲
Export Selection