All Episodes
Previous Next
March 16, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
34:52
March 16, 2010, Tuesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Man, we got so we have so many great sound bites here that I haven't even scratched a surface on because the news continues to break out there.
So Mr. Broadcast Engineer, I want you to be standing by out there starting at sound by 13, and we'll go in order.
And I made well, after we do these first two here, 35 and 36, then we'll do 13.
Anyway, greetings, welcome back.
It's Rush Limbaugh, serving humanity.
Simply by showing up.
Here the EIB network.
Telephone number 800 282-2882, the email address, Lrushbow at EIB net.com.
The Politico, ladies and gentlemen, has noted that I have given out the Capitol Hill switchboard number for only the second time in American history.
For only the second time in American history, I have given out the Capitol Hill switchboard number, and I'm urging everybody to call and ramp it up.
Ratch up the pressure.
And here's something else.
Something else I want you to be on the lookout for.
If you do happen to get through to a member of Congress.
And that member of Congress tells you that he or she is undecided.
That's a delaying tactic.
Demand an answer.
Because the odds are that somebody telling you when you call them, well, decide.
They don't want the grief that they would get if they tell you they're gonna vote for the thing.
So try to pin them down.
Say, what do you mean you're undecided?
It's been going on for a year.
How can you possibly be undecided about that?
We want to know, are you gonna vote for us or against it?
We want you to not support it.
Whatever you tell them, but the this undecided riff is a delaying tactic.
Now here's another switchboard number.
This one's not toll-free.
This one'll cost you.
It's worth it.
202, 224, 3121.
That is the uh the direct Capitol Hill switchboard number, but it's a toll call, as we used to say back in the old days of Ma Bell.
It's a toll call.
Uh it's 202-224-3121.
Uh, I don't have the toll-free number right in front of me.
I think I put it in the bottom of the stack.
I'll dig it out.
It's up on our website at Rushlinbaugh.com as well.
We've got a link to Code Red, which is a website the Republicans have put up that identifies all these uh undecideds in in terms of the of the health care vote.
All right, now we have a couple more examples of the feint that wasn't a feint.
This first one is from MSNBC.
give her or him some space.
So, so let's let's let's just you can hear it plain as day there.
How dare you?
And it kept going.
How dare you?
So what happened?
Apparently there was somebody in the audience who was speaking out against the health care plan.
Probably somebody who has a job.
And well, doubt that anybody in there had a job.
That's why they were there.
Not probably somebody that didn't have a job and really wishes he were focusing on that.
How dare you, how dare you?
And Obama vamps, and to get the guy out of there says, oh, medic, medic, somebody's fainted.
And they come in and they start dragging the guy out.
When he hadn't fainted at all, he was just giving Obama the business.
This is uh, yeah, they were fainting everywhere.
Everybody loved him.
That Obama, like I told you last time, we're never gonna see that Obama again.
I mean, we'll see it then Obama, but we're not gonna see if that kind of see that kind of adoration, love, blind support.
Those days, those days are gone.
Here's the C Pan, C-span version.
Um, and let's see if it's any more intelligible here.
give her or him some space.
I hope you have a shirt.
I don't care if you have a shirt.
So, so let's let's let's just so that's the same clip, two different sources, MSNBC and C-SPAN.
And oh, and we got C, you know, we got a CNN version.
Well, it just came in.
So, that's strange, it didn't go through me.
Usually it goes through me before well anyway, here's C-Span's version.
or him some space.
I don't care.
I don't care.
So, So, so let's let's let's just he did sound a little bit unnerved there.
Yeah.
Hope he has insurance, hope he has insurance.
Well, fascinating, is it not?
Fascinating is it not.
So the fainter didn't faint.
The whole thing, even that was made up.
Cops, dragging the guy, but you gotta give Obama credit.
I mean, that's a quick vamp.
That is a quick vamp call for cops when somebody's giving you the business in there and get him out of there.
Might have been a pre-arranged code, too.
I gotta remember that.
Well, I never get heckled when I go anywhere, but if I ever do.
Medic!
Medic!
Somebody had a heart attack!
Right.
Oh, I have to remember that.
Okay.
John Funn today, Wall Street Journal.
Nobody wants to vote for the Senate bill.
A Democrats are ignoring their own polls.
This is actually a good observation of what's going on here.
A Democrat spin explaining why polls show the public opposed to their health care bill is that voters actually like the individual pieces of the bill, but that they've been turned off by the messy process.
That's the White House pollster, Joel Guy's name, Joel Baronson or something.
And he's out there telling No, no, no, people love the individual stuff in this bill.
What they're tired of is the process.
That's that's what the White House is telling members of the House.
Yesterday, Joel Beninson, a polster for the DNC, Obama's favorite polster, by the way, reported the results of his own survey done for the Service Employees International Union.
It claims the difficulty liberals are having in selling health care reform centers squarely on perceptions of a breakdown in the legislative process, exemplified by deal cutting and special deals for the constituents of key swing senators.
But it appears that Democrats are ignoring their own findings.
Last week Obama backed away from his earlier demand that lawmakers uh strip these special deals out of there.
And then there's Pelosi, who yesterday endorsed the parliamentary maneuver under which the House would deem the Senate's bill to have passed without voting on it.
So they hate the process, right?
The White House owned polls.
People hate the process.
So they ramp up, goofing up the process.
Ms. Pelosi actually told reporters nobody wants to vote for the Senate bill.
Her scheme to allow House members to escape political responsibility even drew the ire of the Washington Post editorial page, which is strongly backed health care reform.
They say what is intended as a final sprint threatens to turn into something unseemly and more important, contrary to Democrats' promises of transparency and time for deliberation.
So in ramming through an unpopular 2700-page health care bill using brute force tactics, the Democrats are in danger of passing what amounts to the longest suicide note in history.
Their own polsters are telling them the public has rebelled against their tactics.
So their response is to press their foot down even harder on the gas pedal and go even crazier on tactics.
We'll see how that works out for them.
John Fund today in the Wall Street Journal.
Alright, to the audio sound bites.
Yeah, you know, I I know I do have I do have the story about the cancer patient that Obama made up a whole story about yesterday.
That it's it's her name is Natoma Canfield, cancer stricken woman.
She's become the latest prop that Obama used yesterday in Ohio.
And I've got the sound bites of him talking about it, and we have the truth.
She's not gonna lose her home.
She's in the hospital being treated for nothing.
No charge.
She's not been left on the side of the road to die.
She's not been kicked out of her house.
None of the things he said about this woman are true.
They said she couldn't come because she's so sick.
Sir sister came up there and stood in for it at the podium with Obama.
Uh it's I it just even Charles Krauthammer last night.
He came close to not having a word for being able to describe uh what Obama's doing here.
To call it dishonest is to really undersell it.
It's far worse than dishonest.
I mean, it's brazenly dishonest because everybody knows uh that what he's saying is not true, and he has to know that every one of these situations is gonna be fact checked, and he's gonna be found out to have made it up.
He doesn't care.
He thinks the moment he says it is all anybody's gonna remember.
And then when the fact check comes in, nobody will pay any attention to that.
Because he's got so much power of persuasion that the sob story will be the thing that people remember most.
Okay, Jinny Thomas is the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
Jinny Thomas is starting a website based on a tea party.
The LA Times ran a hit piece on her Sunday.
And the LA Times basically said, Well, this this I mean, uh, she can't do that.
Why, what about the impartiality of her husband now?
Why, everything, everything that she does is gonna be thinking he's doing it too.
His whole this is this is absolutely silly, uh, and it's purposeful.
Do you know that Ramona Ribston retired from the ACLU after 28 or so years of hitting the damn thing?
For 28 of those years, well, I don't know if it's all 28, but for a whole lot of those years, her husband is on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, is the most leftist radical judge on that circus.
His name is Steven Reinhardt.
Stephen Reinhardt's married to the head hauncher of the ACLU, and not once was his impartiality ever questioned.
Oh no!
And she was praised as a liberal lion.
And he's always written up that way, too.
So here's Jinny Thomas, who has her own life history of being involved as an activist in conservative causes.
All of a sudden, with a hit piece in the LA Times.
This is why, by the way, the LA Times is losing readers.
And what it's content, content, content.
And they're trying to besmirch Jenny Thomas by pointing out that uh she likes me.
This is little Ricky Sanchez on CNN yesterday afternoon.
She has started her own Tea Party branch, loves Rush Limbaugh, refers to the President of the United States' administration as a hard left agenda.
Usually the wife of a justice, a Supreme Court justice, would not take such a public position.
But that does not stop Virginia Thomas, who is publicly, if not downright aggressively, taking on the left, taking on the president, and fighting for all causes from the right.
Yeah, yeah, but of course, uh they can't not allowed.
The liberals can do this.
You know, the wives, husbands of liberal judges, they can be all over the place.
Here's Nina Totenberg.
This is uh on NPR's morning edition of a Linda Wertheimer is the post with uh a host here in Nina Totenberg, and it's sort of a montage.
Thomas says new role is raising questions about potential conflicts of interest for her husband.
She was a top aide to Republican House Leader Dick Army, and in 2000, while Bush versus Gore was before the Supreme Court, she was working at the Conservative Heritage Foundation, helping to recruit staff for a possible Bush administration.
Thomas describes herself as a fan of Rush Limbaugh.
Yeah.
This is not hurting her.
Uh Nina.
Anybody associated with me only is elevated in stature.
You're not hurting her.
You're not hurting her cause.
You people of the LA Times, and you people at CNN, you people at NPR have given her the greatest gift possible.
You have let the whole country know that there is a website out there pushing to save America that they didn't know about.
You're creating all kinds of traffic for it, all kinds of curiosity.
Jenny Thomas minding her own business one day.
She started this thing in January.
She started putting it together in January.
Only now, in the middle of March, did the LA Times hear about it, and now they're having conniption fits out there while in the process making it known to virtually everybody.
And as and as I say, it's not going to hurt her or her website in the slightest.
Here's Jonathan Turley.
He was uh he was on uh MSNBC last night, Lawrence O'Donnell was guest hosting.
Did you ever think it could come to this?
The wife of a Supreme Court justice appearing at an anti-tax rally on tax day, the day when the government collects most of the money it uses to pay her husband's salary.
It's in a word, injudicious.
I mean, you were talking about uh spouses of justices who don't fall directly under the ethics rules, but the fact that this is news is an example of the self-restraint used by most spouses previously.
I mean, this is not much to expect for spouses of justices, so only nine of them, uh, to try to refrain from direct political involvement, uh particularly to start a group like this so far into uh her husband's tenure.
Come on, for crying out loud.
She's worked at the Heritage Foundation.
She has worked at Hillsdale College.
She has been involved in this kind of thing.
She has recruited members of Congress.
She's helped recruit members and educate them.
She has she's been a legislative assistant.
She has she has helped uh uh members of Congress, Republicans come up with arguments to sell issues.
They know all of this.
They know what Jenny Thomas admitted.
I thought women were supposed to seek their own identities.
I thought the feminists had taught us that this is exactly what women should be doing, that they should not be appendages of their husband, that their husband should be appendages of them.
Uh if you can picture that.
Well, anyway, what happened?
What happened to all that?
And don't you think that Jenny Thomas is the first spouse of a judge?
Uh I tell you it.
She was she was involved in this kind of stuff.
Ramona Ripston at the ACLU for crying out loud with her husband of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
And they act like this is something so they're squealing like stuck pigs.
They will always tell us what they're afraid of.
And they're doing it here.
We'll be back.
Sit tight, don't go away.
Now, all of you leftists uh in the media out there, just beside yourselves, that Virginia Thomas, wife of a Supreme Court justice, is starting her own website that is oriented toward causes that are designed to save this country from the American left.
Do you remember the name Hillary Clinton?
Hillary Clinton was a spouse.
She was a spouse not of a Supreme Court justice.
Hillary Clinton was the spouse of the president of the United States.
And because the President of the United States had had dalliances with several women from trailer parks and television studios and pancake houses and so forth, she extracted a price.
She got to play a role in policy in order to stay married and present the happy couple face.
And you don't think there was something unseemly about that.
Hillary Clinton was a spouse, and the last time I looked, she's the Secretary of State, and her husband's an ex-president.
He's running around making speeches all over the place.
Where do you guys find the ability to draw the line here when it comes to Clarence Thomas and his wife?
I have They always will tell us, they will always tell us who they fear.
They'll all us t always tell us what they fear.
And it's obvious that this they just they're scared to death.
They didn't care about it.
They wouldn't be going for it.
They wouldn't be going after Jenny Thomas.
It's only helping her.
This is what they never understand.
Now, folks, if you will indulge me for just a second here.
This is an example of the day.
I just mentioned that the politico, uh, the blog post, uh, saying that only for the second time in history did I urge people to call Washington, actually give out phone numbers.
The blogger, Michael Calderon, has written me a note and said, Look, I know you're busy, and you're still on the air now, but if you have a minute when you're done, I have a couple questions.
I don't, Michael, I really don't have a minute today when I'm done.
So I'm going to answer your questions here on the air.
Now I uh it it it's uh I'm gonna take away from your exclusivity, but one of the questions I already answered on the air today, when was the other time?
When was the other time that you urged this?
It was when Steve Roberts of U.S. News and World Report was doing a profile on me, way back in the 90s.
And he was of the belief, like so many people believed back then, that all I was doing was giving out phone numbers of members of Congress and switchboards in Washington, and he asked me why I did that.
I don't do it.
I'm the one that doesn't do it.
I don't use my show for activism.
I said if I did it, I would shut the place down.
So I'll demonstrate it for you.
So I gave out a number.
I forget what it was about.
I forget what the whole thing was.
I just, in fact, I think I told people, look, I'm trying to demonstrate something to a reporter here.
What'll happen if I give out the Washington switchboard number?
So I gave it out, and of course the switchboard was tied up for a half hour or so.
People couldn't get through.
Same thing happened today at the two toll-free numbers I gave.
Those numbers have now, you don't even get a recording at them now.
They're invalidated.
Nothing happens.
So we've had to give out the uh the toll-free and the toll call numbers.
By the way, the toll-free number of the switchboard is 877-762-8762.
Uh, why did I feel it necessary to do it now?
Because this is ball game.
This is ball game, and the Michael, the only reason we're at this point is because the American people have stood up.
The Republicans don't have the votes to stop this, the Martians don't have the votes to stop this, and the Republicans may as well be Martians on this, given all their influence.
All we can do is continue to have the American people let it be known they want no part of this, the substance of the bill or the process, they don't like it.
And that's why I am urgent, because this is a transformation of our country into something that no one has ever seen it be like.
And we don't want that transformation to take place.
We like America as it was founded.
We don't want to turn it into a third world country.
I have one more question to answer from Michael Calderona, the political.
I'll get to that in just a second.
But has anybody ever heard of Tom and Linda Dashel?
Tom Dashall was the Senate majority leader, and at the time his wife was a lobbyist working on things that came under, of course, his own work.
And they said, oh, no conflict here, don't worry about it.
Nobody had a care in the world about it.
How many members of the media are married to elected officials?
Or how many members of the media have spouses who work for the media?
I know one spouse, well, I know one CNN info babe.
Her husband was a prime advisor to Jane Harmon.
They're since divorced, but I don't think Jane Harmon had anything to do with it.
I mean, the revolving door between media and government spouses, non-spouses, girlfriends, boyfriends, mistresses for crying out loud.
It's all over, it's incestuous in that town.
And all of a sudden, Jenny Thomas is going to start a website, and the world's coming to an end.
Now the world's coming to an end because of Barack Hussein Obama, who is essentially a third world president, and what I mean by that is that he's willing to destroy his own country to save face, like a Kim Jong il or a Castro, or Hugo Chavez.
All to save face.
The health care is not even about health care anymore.
It's not about insurance premiums.
It's not about expanded coverage.
It's about massive tax increases and saving Obama's face.
So that when he looks at himself in the mirror, he still loves himself.
Now, Nina Totenberg, Nina Totenberg is out there, whoa, this is unseemly.
We can't have the wife of a Supreme Court justice involved in partisan politics.
So concerned, so concerned that Jinny Thomas might create a conflict.
A reporter, Nina Totenberg, married to an ex-senator, Floyd Haskell.
She was married to ex-Senator Floyd Haskell.
There's no conflict there, right?
She is best friends with uh with uh Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Nina Totenberg, NPR, a reporter, best friends with one of the most liberal justices on the court.
She's a parent.
She has a kid, she's involved with Americans for democratic action.
And she's a reporter concerned about conflicts.
So what should Jenny Thomas do?
Where does this end?
If she has money invested in real estate and stock, does that mean there's a conflict whenever issues involving real estate and stocks are before the Supreme Court?
What if she is a lawyer who works on antitrust cases?
Does that mean there's a conflict whenever an antitrust case comes before the court?
I mean, the Ramona Ripson Stephen Reinhart marriage was no conflict for the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, was it?
How about as a taxpayer?
Does that mean whenever a case is before the court that involves taxes that there is a conflict?
If Jinny Thomas pays taxes.
I mean, it's it's it it's just absurd on every level.
Stanny Hoyer has just come out and said the Democrats don't have the votes.
Which takes me to the final question from Michael Calderon at Politico.
And Michael, I really am, I just I do not have a moment after the program.
I am swamped until I finally get to lay my head down on a pillow tonight.
Last question from Michael Calderon.
Do you think there's a chance of still changing the minds of members as to how they may vote?
No.
That's no chance, why is Pelosi trying to do that?
Yeah, I think there's a chance.
I think there's a chance of making sure a bunch of no votes don't turn to yes.
I think there's a chance to make some of these undecided go to no, and I think there's a chance to make some of these yes votes last November go to no, because the political climate is totally different.
But if the time was past where there was a chance of still changing the minds of members, then what's Pelosi doing trying to change their minds?
Now, what's Jim Kleiburn doing trying to change their minds?
Why am I getting this question?
Why didn't Michael, why don't you call Pelosi's off?
Do you really think there's a chance of changing your members' minds?
Apparently they're up for grabs because they don't have the votes.
And I apparently am not the one who has to change anybody's minds.
Pelosi is.
Hoyer just came out and said they don't have the votes.
Pure and simple.
One of the underlying aspects of the Democrats' Hail Mary Pass attempt to push this health care plan through is that if it passes, it's the first time in American history the federal government will force every American to buy something, whether you can afford it or not.
Now the Heritage Foundation has been making the point for months.
There's no constitutional or judicial precedent for such a power grab.
None whatsoever.
If this bill passes, the Constitution's carefully crafted limits on congressional power will have been reduced substantially.
It's an all-out of salt here.
Now this is not what the Founding Fathers intended.
And this is why, Michael, and I'm trying to get as many people for the second time in history, to call people in Washington and stop this.
We're dealing with a transformation of this country unlike anything we've seen before, and certainly not as it was founded.
And we did not elect people to overthrow the government.
We did not elect people to reshape it or to remake it.
They are stewards.
The Constitution is the Constitution.
And it doesn't matter to these people.
And it doesn't matter to the people in the media.
They don't care.
They don't even care what the substance of this is.
They're just surprised anybody would oppose it.
Why?
He's a historical president.
He's our first black pro.
Why would you oppose this?
They look at it from the prism as just a horse race.
Can Obama get this done?
Can Obama win?
And secondly, and almost just as important, can Obama beat the Republicans?
Well, hint hint, the Republicans can't stop Obama.
The American people can, but the Republicans can't.
They don't have the votes to stop Obama.
This is not about the Republicans.
The Founding Fathers intended none of this.
Heritage Foundation's on a mission to make sure you know exactly how the Democrats are damaging the bedrock of our system of government.
If you haven't put a copy of the Constitution on your hands lately, the Heritage Foundation wants to fix that.
Join the Heritage Foundation now and they'll send you one.
They'll send you five, actually.
Five pocket-sized versions of this document that we live by that many will be seeing for the first time since it hasn't been taught In so many years in the public school system.
And you can become a member of the Heritage Foundation for as little as 25 bucks.
You get all the benefits of membership.
You get five pocket-sized constitutions to share with people who believe the principles embodied by our founding fathers, or those you want to remind of those principles.
Just go online, Askheritage.org.
Sign up.
It's just 25 bucks.
Here is Chris Christie.
I mentioned earlier that he was giving a gangbuster speech.
Smaller government cool again.
Conservatism in ascendancy.
This this afternoon in Trenton at the State House, Chris Christie, the governor addressing a joint session about the budget.
We have two sound bites.
Here's the first.
Today we are fulfilling the promise of a smaller government that lives within its means.
Today, we begin doing what we promised we would do.
Those defenders of the status quo have already begun to yell and scream.
They will try to demonize me.
They will seek to divide us rather than unite us.
But even they know in their hearts, if not yet in their minds, that it is time for a change.
And that the day of reckoning has arrived.
Today we stop sweeping problems under the rug.
We will not hide our problems until another day.
And we are certainly not increasing the tax burden upon the people that we serve.
Today we are taking necessary and decisive action to reduce state spending and reform state government.
The problems we have hidden for 20 years are evident for all to see.
The day of reckoning has arrived.
New Jersey Governor Chris Christie following through on his promises, the promises that resulted in his election.
Quickly to Houston, this is Preston.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hi, Rush Ditto.
Thank you.
Seems to me that the LA Times just told Jenny Thomas to sit down, shut up, and get in the kitchen.
Exactly right.
Who does she think she is?
Exactly, sir.
Doesn't she know that she is imperiling the U.S. Supreme Court?
Fat chance.
Anyway, folks, they're running around like stuck pigs.
Nothing's going the way it was supposed to go.
Healthcare was supposed to happen last August, if not earlier.
Obama was supposed to be beloved.
The world was going to embrace us once again.
The world hates us.
Worldwide leaders have contempt for Obama, starting in a UK.
Now Obama's not going to fly the American flag in Haiti because he doesn't want it to look like we're occupiers.
So he's got to apologize for us yet again.
The fact that you don't have a job and that millions more of your citizens don't have a job, that doesn't make him mad.
And the fact that Greece is a foreboding sign of what may happen in some states in this country.
It doesn't upset him.
The deficit, the mounting national debt, no, none of that upsets him.
Americans being murdered in Mexico?
Hardly a word.
What really bothers him, what really gets him to lose his cool is when the Jews build 1,600 new homes in Jerusalem.
That makes Barack Hussein Obama mad.
And welcome back.
Rush Limboy and the EIB network.
The House of Representatives, I guess Congress in general, has put out a system advisory saying that house telephone circuits have neared capacity.
And this explains why nobody can get through that there are busy signals.
The actual message, due to the high volume of external calls, house telephone circuits are near capacity, resulting in outside callers getting busy signals.
If you have any questions, please call the technology call center, and there's an 800 number here.
So no, no, I don't want to give that number.
I don't have to give that number out.
But the uh uh people are writing me and saying, we can't get through.
I know you can't get that's the whole point.
This just keep trying.
Nobody else can get through either.
Now, I don't doubt that a lot of members have got their phones turned off and they've got their mailboxes full.
Uh that's why we're asking you to inundate the switchboard.
So, inundate the switchboard, the two numbers uh eight seven seven seven six two eight seven six two is toll-free.
And they took down a toll number on me, so I don't know what that is, but uh the toll-free is eight seven seven seven six two eight seven six two.
Here's Kevin in Columbus, Ohio.
Hi, Kevin.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Great to have you here.
Hey there, how are you doing?
Good.
It it never seems to cease to amaze me that some of the lies and misinformation that you spew.
And your listeners, regular listeners, they believe it.
They believe it all.
I understand that.
And let's start with the small thing you said earlier about food stamps.
Yeah.
You said that you can buy alcoholic beverages with food stamps.
Well, sir, that's you can't do that.
Nobody will let you buy alcoholic beverages with food stamps.
When did that change?
It's always been that way.
Ever since, even when they used to use the paper food stamps, you could never buy cigarettes or alcoholic beverages.
Well, now wait a minute.
Back in the days that I used to go to grocery stores, I've seen it.
Well, then they were breaking the law because you're allowed to buy food.
Who would have thought that would happen?
With food stamps.
You mean they're breaking the law in the food stamp program?
You can am I in it?
No.
But I know that you cannot buy alcoholic beverages with food stamping.
Why?
And they don't even have food stamps anymore.
Use a card now.
Have you tried?
Have I tried?
No, I wouldn't try it because I don't get food stamps, and the other thing I know it's against the law, so I wouldn't do that.
And the third thing, I don't even really drink, so no, I would not do that.
Well, you seem to have a lot of knowledge of it.
I figured you'd try and got it.
I certainly do.
Shut down.
I have a lot of knowledge.
You're right.
And I try to stay with the truth, and unlike you and some of your listeners, I mean they just laugh that stuff up, man.
It's amazing.
And you should be proud of yourself.
Well, you know, the truth has that effect on people out there, Kevin.
The truth is a very infectious thing.
The truth is inspiring, it's uplifting.
It's lies and stuff that anger people.
That's why Obama's in trouble.
He simply can't tell the truth.
So thanks for the endorsement.
I really appreciate it out there.
Thanks, Kevin.
It's Kevin of Columbus, Ohio.
So we have the House Democrats.
We have the House Democrats literally ripping up the Constitution, writing the longest suicide note in history, and calling it self-executing.
We have all that going on, and the media's constitutional scholars are talking about the politics of the wife of a Supreme Court justice.
Amazing stuff.
By the way, the top four Democrat leaders all disagree on where they are in the votes.
Bloomberg, Pelosi says Democrats to have votes for health care bill.
The Hill, Hoyer shoots down Larson's vote count, Clyburn's timeline.
The Hill, Clyburn says health vote could push past Easter holiday.
Politico, Larson says Democrats have the votes.
The Hill, Hoyer shoots down Larson's vote count, says they don't have the votes, and shoots down Clyburn's timeline of Easter.
There's folks to turning into the Keystone Cops.
They're dangerous bunch of Keystone cops, but people are starting to laugh at them now.
The Alinsky rule for radicals of ridicule is being turned on the House Democrats.
▲
Export Selection