All Episodes
Previous Next
March 1, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:40
March 1, 2010, Monday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
You know, speaking of the uh tsunami, which I'm sorry, I just can't forget.
Do you guys hear what um what Obama said when he went out there and made his uh appearance in the uh in a lawn at the White House after the Chile uh earthquake?
He made the statement on tsunami Saturday afternoon.
He said at the end of his statement, he said we can't control Mother Nature.
He's trying to comfort the people of Chile.
Well, yeah, things happen.
We we can't control Mother Nature.
Except when it comes to my global warming policies.
We can't control Mother Nature, but apparently we can stop Mother Nature dead in her tracks if we simply revert our lifestyles back to the Stone Age.
Anyway, do you know this is not the first time the Democrats have tried reconcile by the way, it's Rush Limbo, I know you know that.
Telephone number 800-2882, if you want to be on the program, lots of great people on hole will get to you El Quico.
This is not the first time that the Democrats have tried budget reconciliation to ram health care through.
When was the last time they tried this, nerdly?
Remember when the last time they tried this was?
Hillary care.
They try, they tried it with Hillary care, and back then, it was in 2001.
Uh Byrd made a statement about it.
In 19 leadership.
I sorry, I it'll take me till Tuesday to read this statement that way.
He said, 1993, my own Democrat leadership.
Now listen to this.
In 1993, my own Democratic leadership pleaded with me how many of my friends in the Republican side today would stand as firm as the Rock of Gibraltar as I did on that occasion.
A Democrat leadership pleaded with me at length to agree to support the idea that the Clinton health care bill should be included in that year's reconciliation package.
They came to my office on the floor below.
Not only did Majority Leader George Mitchell and others of my colleagues attempt to persuade me to go along and not raise a point of order under the Byrd rule, which would require 60 votes to wave.
President Clinton got on the phone and called me also and pressed me to allow his massive health care bill to be insulated by the reconciliation's protection.
He called me on the phone.
Here's the president of the United States calling his lowly former coal town boy and asking me, I mean, this guy blow harder what.
Uh asking me to let his huge health bill come before the Senate on that fast track.
I could not, in good conscience, however, look the other way and not make that point of order and allow what would clearly have been an abuse of congressional intent to occur.
Uh how many others would do that today on that side of the aisle, stand against their president?
It's not I don't I don't even know if Bird's gonna stand against it this time.
Well, I think yeah, I think he remembers.
I think he remembers that it's the bird rule, and I think he remembers that he did this in opposing Clinton.
Point is they've tried it before.
Now everybody's saying it's kamikaze.
Everybody's saying they are shooting themselves.
That Pelosi is forcing her people in the house to lose their jobs, and that's true.
Now, in previous broadcasts, I've explained this.
They look at things differently than we do.
Um, and it's this I cannot.
I cannot, no matter how persuasive or talented, I cannot properly convey to you how badly they want this.
They are willing to lose their majorities in order to get this.
And looked at in that light, you have to take this very seriously.
They're running around saying they're gonna use reconciliation, and Kent Conrad says, well, reconciliation won't work.
Uh Andrew McCarthy, good friend of mine, took my uh point, was so inspired by it that he amplified it.
He posted this Saturday morning early at the corner at National Review Online.
I hear Republicans getting well, yes, he was inspired sturdily.
I mean, it's it he mentions me in the first paragraph.
I know he was inspired, yes.
He's a friend of mine, I can say that.
I'm not gonna read the part where he credits me for this.
I'm just gonna tell you.
I'm gonna get to the meat of what he wrote.
I hear Republicans getting giddy over the fact that reconciliation, if it comes to that, is a huge political loser.
It's a wrong way to look at it.
The Democrat leadership has already internalized the inevitability of taking its political lumps.
That makes reconciliation truly scary.
Since the Democrats know they'll have to ram this monstrosity through, they figure it might as well be as monstrous as they can get, wavering Democrats to go along with.
Clipping the leadership's statist ambitions in order to peel off a few Republicans is not going to work.
I'm glad Republicans have held firm, but let's not be under any illusions about what this means.
In the Democrat leadership, we're not dealing with conventional politicians for whom the goal of being re-elected is paramount and will reign in their radicalism.
They want socialized medicine and all it entails about government control, even more than they want to win elections.
After all, if the party of government transforms the relationship between the citizen and the state, its power over our lives will be vast even in those cycles when it is not in the majority.
This is about power.
There's more power to power than winning elections.
Especially if you've calculated that your opposition does not have the gumption to dismantle your ballooning welfare state.
Consequently, the next six weeks, like the next ten months are going to be worse than we think.
We're all wired to think that everybody plays with the usual rules of politics.
That is, if the tide starts to change, the side against whom it's turned modifies its positions in order to stay viable in the next election.
But what'll happen here will be the opposite.
You have a party with numbers, the numbers to do anything it puts its mind to, led by movement leftists, who see their window of opportunity is closing.
We seem to expect them to moderate because that's what everybody in their position does, but they won't.
They'll put their heads down, they'll go for as much transformation as they can get, figuring that once they get it, it'll never be rolled back.
The only question is whether there are enough Democrats who are conventional politicians and who care about being re-elected, such that they will deny the leadership the numbers it needs.
But I don't think we should take much heart in this possibility.
Those Democrats may well come to think they're going to lose anyway.
That's why so many of them are abandoning ship now.
If that's the case, their incentive will be to vote with the leadership.
At the end of that summit, debacle, Obama put the best face on a bad day by indicating that he intended to push ahead with socialized medicine and face the electoral consequences.
That's what elections are for.
And we'll deal with that in November.
He said it.
And he's right about it.
For Republicans, it's not going to be enough to fight this thing and then deride it if the Democrats pull it off.
And finally close to a very likely electoral victory in November.
The question is, what are you going to do to roll this back?
What's your plan to undo this once they get it done?
See, our side's probably analyzing this all wrong.
Because today's Democrats are controlled by the radical left.
And it's more important to win the upcoming elections.
That's that's that's what everybody thinks, but it's not.
It is more important to them to execute the permanent transformation of American society.
They have already factored losing in November, even losing big.
For them, winning big now outweighs that.
And so getting giddy over this now they're committing suicide is you know the wrong way to look at this, because if it does lead to these mass defeats, and the Republicans do claim power again, the focus now has to be on rolling this back and stopping it.
Depending on how they uh how they get it done.
And Erwin Stelzer at the Weekly Standard had a post recently.
Americans overwhelmingly say that their main concern is jobs and that they're satisfied with their current health care arrangements.
In response, an allegedly chastened Obama pivoted, said his primary concern from now on will be job creation, which will take priority over his health care plan.
Yet last week, he backed a $15 billion job creation bill, which passed the Senate and a one trillion dollar health care bill.
Since the federal balance sheet is already under huge pressure, this set of priorities tells us that the Obama administration intends to concentrate available resources on transforming the economy.
A long-term permanent restructuring of health care and energy that was planned long before the failure of Lehman Brothers triggered the financial mess that Obama inherited.
Indeed, they have wanted this since FDR.
They have dreamed of this.
And they have never been closer.
And that's why they will do anything to get it done.
Remember, ladies and gentlemen.
On one side you have rules.
On the other side, you have Democrats, which means you don't have any rules.
And we're back, Rush Limbaugh having more fun than anybody.
Any human being ought to be allowed to have.
I'm your highly trained broadcast specialist.
Showing how it's done.
Everybody wants to be me.
Ashley, 23 years old from Gainesville, Florida.
Nice to have you on the program.
Hi.
Thanks, Rush.
Um, I was calling because I had a comment about um you were talking about the civics classes and how so many college students couldn't answer the questions and didn't know anything about the Bill of Rights.
And um, for one of my classes, a comparative politics class, one of our assignments was to create a new Bill of Rights.
And being an online class, we get to look at the discussions, and a lot most of the class put that health care would be included in the Bill of Rights because health care is a right to all citizens, as well as a good education.
Most of them wanted a college education to be something everyone has, and it's free.
Um, well, uh this pretty much confirms the ignorance of the civics test.
Yes.
Pretty much.
Just wanted to health care should be free, huh?
Yeah, health care and education.
Everyone should have a college education.
Yeah.
Uh and uh well, where do we stop there?
Um everybody should have a car, right?
Right.
Yeah.
And everybody should have two houses.
One for the winter time and one for the summertime.
It's only fair.
A lot of people were quoting FDR's um addition to the Bill of Rights, where everyone should be entitled to a decent house and a good education, health care and a job.
Yep.
Yeah, and and it all ought to be free.
Yeah, everyone should be giving it.
It's a right.
It's not just free, it's a right.
It's a right, yeah, and and everybody should earn minimum a hundred and fifty thousand dollars a year.
Yep.
But uh yeah, it's that sounds wonderful.
It's uh you know, it's been only been tried about a gazillion times in human history, and it just has led to poverty.
Mm-hmm.
Stupidity, ignorance, and scientists who forecast tsunamis that don't exist.
Yes.
So how do you feel about this?
When you're in you taking this class.
Oh, it's really frustrating to me.
I mean, I read all these responses, and it just I just don't understand how people think that's a right.
I don't think they understand what the bill of rights is or what it's because it's because they haven't been taught the first bill of rights really means.
They haven't been taught anything about capitalism.
Right.
They're they're they're they're being brainwashed by a bunch of uh liberal professors and so forth.
It's it's oh, yeah.
It's it's pretty frustrating when I'm on the other side of what all these people are wanting and having, and I'm the only one in the class that has the opposite opinion.
So you discuss it with them?
Well, it's an online class, so we do forums, so we get to read, but I always comment on them and ask them why they would what what do they consider a decent home when my decent home could be, you know, just a little random old house, and theirs might be, you know, a mansion on the beach.
Who's to decide what that is?
But I never get any responses back.
Yeah, well, you you probably won't, but they'll they'll s at some point they'll say government.
Yeah.
Or it should be whatever I want.
Mm-hmm.
But how do you set the standard?
And they I just don't think they realize the whole constitution was to protect us from the government, and they want the government to do everything for us.
Right.
Now that's what FDR's second bill of rights was all about.
That's and Obama looks at it that way too.
This is the there's a uh uh a line of thinking that's that's they've been around a long time that views the Constitution as a negative set of liberties, which statists, big government people would only naturally see the Constitution in a negative light, because the Constitution tells status and big government people what they cannot do.
By design.
That's why and how we were founded.
But they don't like that.
They want a new bill of rights to basically say what they can do.
And they keep saying for us, but it's to us.
They're just power zealots and so forth, but they're uh they're all over the well, I uh appreciate you hanging in there uh on this because it's i I can imagine how uh how frustrating it is.
You ought to you ought to try laughing at them in your in your replies.
Ridicule, you know, go saw a Linsky on them.
Just ridicule them to say you're Gevin, you're having the most fun reading some of these posts that you've had since you listened to me that day.
That'll really set them off.
You know, I haven't had this much fun since I was listening to Rush today.
You people are making my day.
Do you honestly believe this?
And then just get out of the way for the next set of responses, and whatever they are, just fire back with some more laughter.
Oh, you're you're kidding, right?
I mean, you you you're you're just trying to pollute the message boards, right?
You don't really believe it.
Say stuff like that to them.
You know, don't argue with them.
They're not smart enough to be persuadable.
These people have been brainwashed.
Their minds are right.
You have to ridicule them and shame them and and and and have them realize that they've been had and that they've been stupid.
And since nobody wants to believe they're stupid.
You ever heard anybody admit it?
Yeah, yeah, I'm stupid.
Nobody admits it.
Because they don't want they don't want to feel it.
So you have to make them feel stupid.
You can have fun doing it.
That's what I do with the liberals that call here.
And wherever I run into them.
It's and they last about thirty seconds and then they start personal insults and all that.
So hang in there, Ashley, and have fun with that.
Lisa or Lisa, I guess it isn't.
St. Louis.
Thank you for holding.
And welcome.
Well, thank you.
Listen, even if Obama and Pelosi get some filet mignon and grind it up and then try to cut it into the dog food, people still aren't gonna choke it down.
Uh this country isn't gonna be you can't lead it from the position where they are standing, from the lo from the p the spot on the line where they're standing.
Wait, wait, no, I uh you you're right, but they're not trying to lead.
Right.
They're trying to push.
They are trying to control.
This is not about leadership.
This is about power and control.
Right.
Right.
Well, the other reason I was calling is to say, you know, that uh you're talking about Congress and how you know they can't win.
These people are screwed no matter how they try.
They are gonna lose.
I I really believe, no matter what happens with health care, that Democrats are gonna lose, and Rush, I'm worried about 'em.
Where are they gonna find another job?
Oh, that's no that's that's easy.
Uh how many of them have already been how many of them have already been promised uh judgeships?
How many of them have promised ambassadorships?
Hell, how many of them have been promised ships?
How many of them are gonna be they're gonna be government employees?
Yeah.
They're gonna work for the federal government.
Well, they could become lobbyists and get rich.
Right.
They can't work, you know, they can't be cynics instructors because they can't, you know, they don't even know the Constitution according to that one study you talked about earlier.
That doesn't matter.
All that makes them eminently more hireable and more qualified.
All right, well then you're not as worried about, you're not worried about implying to work.
Thank you.
Uh I don't know.
I I I don't I except to the extent that you like serving in Congress because of the element of power you feel or you have uh doing that, but I you know, I don't I don't think that um uh in in in some cases, depending on who they are, uh they'll be taken care of.
Some of them may have already been told how.
Right.
We're just not sure.
We're just not sure.
Anyway, listen, thanks for the call.
I appreciate it.
Uh let's say where we're going next, snurdly, we're gonna stay in St. Louis or we're gonna go.
Ah, Evelyn in Texas Arcana.
Great to have you on the program.
Hi.
Oh, thank you.
It's just an honor to talk to you.
I can't believe it.
I'm glad you got through.
Oh, I've tried so many times over the years and this is the first time.
But anyway, I'm calling about this dumbing down of America thing that you've been talking about with different people.
I teach remedial math at a local community college.
And in the class I teach they're not allowed to use calculators.
And you would be surprised, or probably you wouldn't be surprised how many cannot add, subtract, multiply, and divide without a calculator.
And I mean it's just been mind boggling to me to realize the degree.
I mean, so it's not just about the Constitution, it's about everything.
And I also work in the uh testing center and they have to when they come in there they have to look up at a analog clock and write down the time.
And you would be surprised how many cannot read an analog clock.
You are kidding me.
No, no, I'm not.
You mean you have to tell 'em when the big hand is on the six and a little hand is on it too, then it's two thirty.
But they they don't they look up there and they don't have a clue.
And we we have finally put a little digital clock there by the sign in thing because they they can't read the analog clock.
Oh, that's how that's how bad it is.
Well, look, th th there's certain aspects of digital age, calculators and so forth.
Um I I don't I can understand that.
Um what so what when you say you're teaching remedial math, what are you trying to remedy beside the calculator usage?
Oh, okay.
Well, it's just the math I'm teaching it's called pre algebra.
And they ha it's a certain that they have to come up to speed before they can take a college law.
I misread the clock.
Yeah, well, I'm really sorry about that.
I was using a digital clock and I um uh I I screwed up.
I have no problem with analogs.
Um but digital's uh sometimes gonna be a problem.
I I wanted you to give it uh give you a chance to conclude what you were saying.
Oh, that's all I just was yeah, but the math that I teach is to you know, these are call it I mean high school graduates wanting to begin college and the math I teach is middle school, basically, middle school math.
To high school graduates.
Yeah, right.
Right, okay.
And uh but anyway, I just wanted to let you know that I it just amazed me.
How the hell did they graduate?
I don't know.
That's just it.
How that's what I want to know.
Yeah.
Really.
Well, it's a good thing they didn't or you wouldn't have a job.
Yeah, so you bank on stupidity in order to work.
I mean, I love what I do, but it's just a shame that there's so many that need what I do.
You know what I mean?
I'm glad you do.
It's important to love what you do.
Uh I've heard every poll dancer say that as well.
So it's true of every profession.
Thanks, Evelyn, very much.
Uh I I had a verbal faux pas a moment ago when discussing negative and positive rights versus the Bill of Rights.
Um uh we it is our side, the good guys who believe the Constitution is a document of negative rights.
Uh that is the government has limited authority.
Not that we do.
Our rights don't come from the Constitution, they come from God.
The Constitution limits government authority, it does not create rights like the right to health care.
Um the left means positive rights because they mean that it creates material rights for people which the government is to provide, and that's what they want to do with the second uh bill of rights.
Okay, now I I promised I'm gonna get into this global warming stack and I'm gonna get into it in a minute.
I'm putting it off for as long as I can.
But I'm gonna do it.
But first, back to St. Louis and Annette.
And I'm glad you call.
Great to have you here.
Rush, I am so honored to speak with you.
I'm afraid I'm gonna trip over my tongue.
Um I'm calling about uh what?
I'd like to see that.
Oh yeah.
Uh well I'm nervous.
Uh I I'm so honored and you're a patriot.
I listen to you all the time.
I'm also a member.
Um, I'm calling about uh the education problem.
Last week you had a caller, a teacher who said that uh from she was from Kansas and said that um history would no longer be taught in the schools.
Um I am your age.
Um my parents moved around a lot when I was little and I had Missouri Constitution and the United States Constitution four times in four different schools, both uh private and public.
And none of those uh classes wasn't taught that this would be important to us in our future.
Uh it was all dry facts.
So that many years ago it was so deteriorated, what do you think is happening now?
Um it's not being taught at all, I fear.
It's not and I'll tell you why it's not.
It's not being taught now because the left does not want young people to learn of socialism's failures.
They do not want young kids to learn of communism's failures.
They do not want the left the young to learn anything about the the the positive nature of uh of of capitalism and the great success brought about by the Reagan years and so forth they don't want to teach it.
Uh so they lie about what really happened in the eighties and what so forth and so on.
It's it's a hideous it's a hideous thing and it's not about leadership.
It's purely and simply about about control.
But Snerdly had an interesting observation about the the woman what was her name I'm having a mental jam that called last hour or who said that it wasn't important kids that they don't they're not interested in the Constitution right now.
That'll happen when they get older and Snerdly said you know but you got you were so immersed in that point that you missed a biggie that she made what was that because I very seldom miss anything he said you didn't hear her say that up until three months ago she made her husband turn the radio off when you were on because all you were with negative negative negative and she didn't want to hear it.
And then all of a sudden three months ago when everything started to fall apart in the country she started listening to you and now you are teaching her and you are informing her.
Oh yeah I heard her say that well you didn't make no big deal to you because that happens to you all the time but imagine a Democrat listening to that from their point of view that is scary.
That is got to be because here they think all kinds of people hate you and think you're a maniac and what and now people who used to think that are getting their information from you and that's got to be blowing their mind and probably is one of the reasons why Obama set up that spam website Whitehouse.gov so I said well you're getting a lot of calls like this oh yeah they're f they're f they're flooding in here I don't put nearly as many up as as I could because that's all there would be I limit calls
praising you to no more than 10 an hour.
Any more than that I think if people get tired of it.
And I said well that's pretty good judgment on your part uh try to keep it at ten an hour or anything beyond that probably would run people the wrong way so uh anyway that I thought I thought Snerdley had a uh excellent point she said she was oblivious didn't even like hearing about politics because it was it was it was all argument it was all confrontation didn't even like hearing about it.
It was all made her husband turn the radio off she was just oblivious to it didn't matter now it's important and that's happening um I think all over the country in in in many ways.
I get in in that regard it's worse for the Democrats than they even know electorally but again they don't care when it comes to health they do not care.
Folks let me it's I explained this to you once before and it is it is an expansion on Andy McCarthy's expansion of something that I said originally he said it's not time to get giddy here over the problems that they face if they are willing to lose and lose big to get this done because they are confident the Republicans won't have the guts to roll it back.
Look at what happened when Bush tried to reform Social Security Social Security as you know has become the third rail here's why it is important if they get it done this is why the objective and the campaign theme has to be roll it back.
Roll it back you remember all the people on Social Security, getting social security benefits of one kind or another.
All those years where the Democrats said the Republicans want to take away your Social Security.
The Republicans want to kick you out of your house.
It worked for a whole lot of election cycles.
It was only in the mid early to mid-90s when it started bombing out because after so many years of these predictions, it never happened.
Nobody ever took their house away.
Nobody ever tried to cut Social Security.
It was all a lie.
And when the new media was born, led of course by me, this option and reality was presented to people.
But if they get health care done, uh this everybody's going to be on government health care under their plan at some point.
If it's ten years down the road or five, whatever it is, that's the objective.
Everybody's going to be on government health care.
And then if if we don't roll it back, then we're stuck with it.
And any attempt to roll it back after it gets settled in, if any attempt to roll it back after more and more Americans are being insured by the government, those Republicans fought giving you health care.
They want to take your health care benefits away.
They want to take your hulk and it'll work.
Says cannot be allowed to stand even if they get it done.
So it's it's not enough just to take uh comfort and even enjoyment in what will no doubt be a disastrous election for them.
If they get this done before November, then a serious plot to undo it is got to become the focus.
And they are banking on the fact that the Republicans don't have the guts to do that.
We'll see.
Nobody knows.
Because we don't know if they're going to get it, and we don't know what the results of that are definitely going to be.
So you don't want to count your eggs before the chickens hatch.
Or whatever that is.
I don't know.
Screw.
I just got an email saying that I'm watching the bachelor final tonight.
I didn't get an email inviting me to watch the bachelor final.
I got an email telling me I'm going to be watching it with the dog, too.
Bachelor, the TV show on ABC, The Bachelor.
You got the same email from your wife, Brian?
Oh.
Snurdly, I don't have time.
Time is dwelling out of time.
A bachelor is somebody who's not married.
Well, okay.
Then what I got a TV show about some schlub, everything got a new shlub every year with a bevy of gullible babes, and he winds and dines them for the whole season and he picks one.
And then they supposedly go off and get married.
And women love it.
That's all I can tell you.
Snartley's rolling his eyes in there.
Hey, a guy whose real name is Robin Hood was charged with ID theft.
Robin Joshua Hood was in charged.
I kid you not.
Yeah, Robin Joshua Hood, Democrat, Sherwood Forrest.
He seriously was charged in Denver with identity theft and criminal impersonation.
He found a wallet in downtown Denver.
He assumed the identity of the owner.
Robin Hood told investigators after his arrest he was he was uh he was wanted out of Denver for drug violations.
He didn't want to be arrested on a Denver arrest warrant, so he used the name that he stole, which was blacked out in court documents when issued a summons in Denver for shoplifting.
According to the documents, and this back on January 6th, Robin Hood was leaving the independent records when security grabbed him for shoplifting three baseball caps.
Now, when I've told you about computers stalled in a 20th Century Fox animation department, and I do some work with Family Guy, and they've got my identity, Social Security and the various other important information, identifying me, contractual date and so forth.
That's why computers are password protected.
Uh, but we still think you should take steps.
Well, I already had taken steps because I'm a premium life lock subscriber and member.
They're the best.
Not everybody's gonna stop um identity theft every time, but they do the best.
Life lock helps protect your information.
They don't sell it like some other companies do, and their lifelong identity alert system is the best there is.
Just call them 800-440-4833 and save 10% off your life lock membership just by mentioning my name.
You you have no idea the doors that will open to you just by mentioning my name anywhere.
800-440-4833 for LifeLock.
Call them now.
All right.
I'm down to a precious few broadcast moments.
And I've got this global warming.
So let me just give you the headlines.
I'll save the stack for tomorrow, but there's some good stuff happening.
Physicist's memo to Parliament blasts.
Man-made global warming science.
I have been asking these scientists who value their reputation to be doing this ever since the East Anglia hoax was uh revealed last November.
Uh they have some scientists have begun the necessary work to save their profession in the wake of climate gate.
Al Gore has led a large portion of the scientific community off the credibility cliff, and he's tried to save it with a rambling, incoherent the first paragraph alone is nutso.
Op Ed in the New York Times.
In fact, let me let me.
I I I highlighted this piece that Al Gore wrote, and I'm telling you, folks, I felt like I was in one flu over to Cuckoo's Nest.
Oh, see, we finally um yeah.
We can't wish away climate change.
It would be an enormous relief if the recent attacks on the science of global warming actually indicated that we do not face an unimaginable calamity requiring large-scale preventive measures to protect human civilization as we know it.
That's how he starts trying to save what has been exposed as a hoax.
And after that, you go grab a straitjacket and you want to put it on yourself.
Of course, we still need to deal with the national security risks of our growing dependence on global oil and dominated by dwindling reserves in the most unstable region of the world.
But what a burden would be lifted if we could do this.
We would no longer have to worry that our grandchildren would one day look back on us as a criminal generation that had selfishly and blithely ignored clear warnings that their fate was in our hands.
We could instead celebrate the naysayers who had doggedly persisted in proving that every major National Academy of Sciences report on climate change had simply made a huge...
It's downhill from there.
It's literally embarrassing.
So that's the Al Gore piece.
There's a piece that we dug up January 26, 1989, New York Times.
January 26, 1989, headline, U.S. data since 1895 failed to show warming trend.
So in 1989, the New York Times ran a story saying that using data, U.S. data, since 1895 failed to show any warming.
There's that.
Then we've got a great piece from the U.K. Telegraph by Christopher Booker.
A perfect storm is brewing for the IPCC, the Emerging Errors.
Their 2007 report are not incidental, but fundamental.
I mean, it further illustrates the intentional hoax that this entire movement is.
Okay.
So I'll I'll save this stack and give you the uh the wonderful details of it all tomorrow.
A quick call here, Donna in Hanford, California.
I'm glad you waited.
Welcome to the program.
I have about a minute max.
Okay.
Thank you.
This is my theory as to why Pelosi Reed Dodd Carey, all these people supported Obama.
It's not because what their mouths were saying that he was this brilliant, brilliant statesman.
It's because he's exactly the opposite.
They knew he was incompetent.
They knew I think the analogy I used is that he couldn't find his way out of a bathroom stall with the door open.
And in his own words, he had to be told how to vote.
So well, they uh uh maybe, but I also think they supported him because he could win.
Yeah.
And and and because the reasons they thought he could win uh were purely um surface, shall I say.
And on that note.
Time is tight here, but we're gonna squeeze it in from Fox 25 Eyeball News in Boston.
Uh, Friends of the intellectually disabled are pushing to ban the word retard in Massachusetts today.
Soldiers of the anti-R movement will stage a pledge drive at the Statehouse collecting signatures from those who want the word removed from everyday speech.
Now, they need a guest speaker.
They need if they really want to get this campaign off, and I got just a guy, Rom Emanuel.
If anybody needs to be leading the movement to ban the word retard anywhere, it would be Rom.
See you tomorrow, folks.
▲
Export Selection