All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 17, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:30
February 17, 2010, Wednesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hiya folks, we're back.
It's Rush Limbaugh and the fastest three hours in media, also known as the Rush Limbaugh program here on the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
It's a thrill and a delight, as always, to be with you.
And we'll get to your phone calls as always in this hour.
The telephone number is 800-282-2882, the email address, lrushbo at EIBnet.com.
This wacko professor from the University of Alabama at Huntsville, Amy Bishop.
So she, what does she shoot?
She fired at 10 people, hit five or six people, hit three, whatever it was, because she was denied tenure last April.
She just lost it.
It was said that this woman was a rabid fringe kook liberal who was so into Obama that she was off-putting to people.
In 1986, she shot her brother.
And the DA at the time, current Congressman Bill Delahunt from Massachusetts, decided not to prosecute.
Now they're reviving that and saying he could have, I mean, this was not an accident.
It could have been some charges made, but he didn't.
Delahunt, by the way, also now threatening not to run.
And in a situation like this, when a Democrat in Massachusetts says, I'm not running, I think they mean I'm not running.
Now we learn that in March of 2002, this wacko professor, Amy Bishop, walked into an IHOP in Peabody, Massachusetts, in the Boston Globe, with her family, asked for a booster seat for one of her children, and learned the last seat had gone to another mother.
According to the police report, Amy Bishop, the professor, strode over to that woman, demanded the seat, and launched into a profanity-laced rant.
When the woman would not give up the child seat, the booster seat, Bishop punched the woman in the head, all the while yelling, I am Dr. Amy Bishop.
I'm a professor.
I'm a professor.
I am Dr. Amy Bishop.
Now, for this, she received probation, and prosecutors recommended she be sent to anger management classes, although this was assault.
It's unclear from court documents whether a judge ever sent her to anger management courses.
The woman who got beat up, identified as Michelle Jika, declined to comment, saying, it's not something I want to relive.
Is it not clear now the only place that would hire this nutcase is a university?
The only place that would hire, it's stunning to me, she did not get tenure.
But what I want to know is this, because each time some kook goes on a shooting rampage out there, the first thing that drive-bys do is try to find out the radio talk show listening habits of the kook.
And they turn over every rock.
They go through every bit of evidence they can find, desperate to prove that the kook shooter listens to Rush Limbaugh.
So far, they haven't been able to find anything.
What I want to know is, where are those same phony drive-bys suggesting that this might be Obama's responsibility?
Like they've been dying to do to me for 20-plus years because this woman was so into Obama that she was off-putting.
Now, we obviously can't blame Obama for trashing this woman at the IHOP.
And by the way, what is a professor doing at an IHOP?
Doesn't she know that professors and elitists wouldn't dare go into an IHOP or a Denny's or a McDonald's or a Burger King or a KFC or a Subway?
What the hell is she doing in an IHOP?
What's that great restaurant they took me up there to, H.R. Lock Lober?
Shouldn't she be in that place?
Lock Lober.
Was she doing in a freaking IHOP?
Well, I know.
That's where the common people, the ordinary people who end up doing extraordinary things, they go to IHOP.
They go to Mickey D's.
They go to Subway.
They go to KFC.
They go to Pizza Hut, but professors don't.
You want to...
Somebody tell me the last time anybody saw Skip Gates in an IHOP.
Somebody tell me the last time they saw Skip Gates in a Denny's having the Grand Slam breakfast.
This woman went into IHOP.
She had a Grand Slam breakfast on the head of another patron.
And she's in the tank for Obama.
Why does nobody?
Well, I guess somebody just has.
Somebody pretty important just has.
That would be I speaking in the nominative.
Young people would say that would be myself because they're improperly educated.
Nevertheless, Bill O'Reilly had Sarah Palin on last night, would not let go of this retard business.
We got two sound bites.
O'Reilly said, I want to give you a chance to clarify something.
You call for Ram Emmanuel to actually step aside because he used effing retard.
And then Rush Limbaugh said it.
He was talking about political correctness.
That was before Emmanuel, I think it was.
No, it wasn't, Bill.
You're miss.
And by the way, Bill saw this last night.
Bill read an email at the end of his program from one of his folks.
And one of his folks said, look, Bernie Goldberg says lamestream media.
You ought to realize that Laura Ingerman, Rush Limbaugh, invented that term.
And I just want to give a shout out to Bernie Goldberg.
I have never used lamestream media.
I didn't create that.
I don't know if Laura did, but I had nothing to do with it.
Mine's been drive-by or punk me, whatever.
State-controlled.
But I've never called them a lamestream media.
And I never used the effing R-word syndrome until Rom Emmanuel did it for the express purpose of pointing out this is how those people really talk.
We're the ones who get tarred and feathered with talking that way when we don't.
And I'm just trying to ram it down the media's throat because you people on the left are the ones with the trash mouths.
You're the ones that have no respect for people that are not as good as you.
So effing retard is what they think of all of us.
I was just trying to highlight that.
So here's Sarah Palin's response.
Rom Emmanuel, who represents the most powerful man, the leader of our free world, called a group of people whom he disagreed with effing retards.
Quite inappropriate.
And on my Facebook, I said there, too.
I don't think he should be part of our president's inner circle making decisions that affect every single one of us.
He's given our president some very bad advice in a whole realm of different areas.
And as for Rush Limbaugh, no, I believe that it was after Rom Emmanuel said what he said, that Rush Limbaugh, using satire, not calling a group of people effing retards, but using, yes, the R word.
And I said that, come on, let's all grow up and let's not call each other names because it certainly kind of invalidates what our argument's all about when we start calling people names.
Wasn't good enough for O'Reilly had to ask the question again for the folks to make sure the folks understood her answer.
Here's what he said.
Okay, but just to be clear, you didn't come down on Mr. Limbaugh because you felt that, what, he didn't have any ill intent in what he said, or why didn't you come down on him a little bit?
As I have explained, he was using satire, using the R word, so he can bring to light what it was that Rom Emmanuel was calling other people.
And not just Ram Emmanuel, but all of those elitist.
I'm glad I caught myself with the next word.
That one is not the R word.
It was the T word.
These people talk like this.
They are the most condescending.
They are the most arrogant.
And they talk about people like that all the time.
Now, this is funny.
The staff is in there trying to think what the T-word is.
You want me to create a picture so that you might be able to understand what the T-word is?
Doesn't that kind of help you?
If I have to create a picture, it doesn't tell you.
Okay.
Let's see.
Picture to convey what I almost said that I'm now characterizing as the T-word.
Because that's what these people are.
So imagine yourself in a swimming pool.
A lot of people in there.
You come up for air, and floating by your face is a Tootsie Roll Barb.
Okay, as promised, let's go back to the phones.
Dave in Vancouver, it's great to have you here.
Thank you so much for waiting.
Great to have you on the program.
How are you doing?
Megaditto to you, buddy.
Thank you, sir, very much.
Yeah, I'm a first-time caller, and I've only been listening to you for about three or four months, and I'm in your corner.
Well, by that three or four months, and you're in my corner, you've gone well past the minimum required six weeks to become addicted.
So welcome to the EIB Network, sir.
Yeah, thank you.
These are these tax breaks that Obama's been talking about.
Now, I'm a middle-class blue-collar worker.
Last year, I made a little over $100,000 between me and the wife.
And this year, we just barely cracked 70.
I lost my job, got a new job, and all that kind of stuff.
And I got a whole whopping $500 back from Uncle Sam in federal taxes on my tax return.
Now, wait, just a minute.
That does not mean you got a tax cut.
No.
No.
What it means is I got raked over the coal.
I lost $30,000 in annual income, and I don't get anything back from the federal government.
What's going on there?
Well, how do you call that a tax break?
Well, no, no, no, no, wait a second now.
You didn't get a tax cut.
There's no question you didn't get a tax cut.
Nobody got a tax cut.
The tax cuts they're talking about were one-time tax credits.
You go out and buy a new muffler was what the original idea was.
But you can't compare when you get $500 back in your tax return.
That just means that your withholding was adjusted in such a way that you paid more than you should have.
And so that $500 refund was a refuse.
You overpaid your taxes.
And I'm sure that was due to the fact that you kept the withholding where it was when your income was at $100,000.
So you did pay less in taxes, but you did not get a rate cut.
So you didn't make out.
I mean, you're not ahead of the game at all, other than the way you did it.
You had a $500 lump there that you might otherwise not have had.
But that was just because you didn't readjust your withholding to match, because you didn't know.
I mean, it sounds like you're an independent contractor in a lot of ways.
Your income varies from year to year.
But Dave, it's great to have you in the audience.
Thank you so much.
Did you see that Obama has a new envoy to the Organization of Islamic Conference?
In other words, Obama has a new envoy to the Muslim world.
Now this guy's name is Rashad Hussein, and it may well be that he is a convicted, not that it may well be that he vouched for a convicted terrorist.
All that's academic to me.
I want to know what in the world, why in the world does Obama need an envoy to the Muslim world?
What's he?
He went over there and made that Cairo speech.
I mean, why would Barack Hussein Obama need an envoy to the Muslim world?
I thought Obama was unique in his connection with the Muslims.
I thought it was that bumbling cowboy, George Bush, would need a special envoy, but Obama is the special envoy, is he not?
And it's not even that.
NASA, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, plans more outreach to Muslim countries.
This is from the Orlando Sentinel.
It's not from Scott Ott.
It's not from The Onion.
NASA Administrator Charlie Bolden said yesterday that President Obama has asked him to find ways to reach out to dominantly Muslim countries as the White House pushes the space agency to become a tool of international diplomacy.
NASA?
What are we looking for?
Muslim astronauts?
Spacewalkers?
What is this?
And how about this, folks?
Three major firms have pulled out of the Climate Change Alliance.
You're not seeing this reported in the state-controlled media, but this is big news.
ConocoPhillips, BP America, that's British Petroleum, and Caterpillar.
Might I remind you about Caterpillar and Obama at the outset of his stimulus package when we were told that the money would be used for shovel-review jobs.
He said the CEO of Caterpillar told him that he signed on to this as being good, and the Caterpillar CEOs.
I didn't say that.
And the Caterpillar CEO continued to lay off people that work for Caterpillar.
So ConocoPhillips, BP America, Caterpillar pulled out of a leading alliance of businesses and environmental groups pushing for climate change legislation on Tuesday, citing complaints that the bills under consideration are unfair to American industry.
The sudden pullout of three corporate giants from a leading alliance of businesses and environmental groups could be the death knell for climate change legislation that's cap and trade languishing on Crapitol Hill.
This, folks, let me tell you what this is.
This is huge.
BP, think of it this way.
Think of it this way.
ConocoPhillips, BP America, and Caterpillar are the same as New Jersey, Virginia, and Massachusetts.
This is the tipping point.
And now that these three have decided to say, hell with this, I wouldn't be surprised if more and more companies ever so slowly and ever so slightly pull out of this whole sham and go their own direction as well.
And one reason I think that there are going to be lawsuits that will be popping up all over the false research and claims.
Folks, do you realize how much money has been spent, allocated, and now wasted on a hoax?
We have destroyed the U.S. automobile business over a hoax.
We have polluted the minds of children in our public school system for decades over a hoax.
At some point, Al Gore and these hoaxers ought to be subject to being sued big time.
This is not small.
This is not somebody or a group of people who were just a little wrong.
These people perpetrated a hoax knowingly for over 25 years.
And if I know people, I know people, there are going to be some lawsuits over this because there are so many people.
Al Gore has amassed a fortune of $500 million investing in companies to deal with an imaginary non-existent problem.
There are so many people liable in this hoax and many others who want to throw them under the bus.
Now, a company in the old days before crony capitalism showed up wanted to do and give customers things that they would pay money for in order to earn a profit.
Now, I've never seen a study, but I know that when I shop, everything's green or organic or carbon neutral.
The hoax is continuing.
All of this green this and green that.
It's nothing more than a slick marketing campaign to separate people from their money on the basis that they're pushing a political agenda in order to stay on good graces with the American people who've been duped into believing the hoax.
The light bulbs.
The compact fluorescent light bulbs.
It's part of a hoax.
We are, in 2012, having a standard old ordinary Thomas Edison light bulb is going to be illegal.
For no reason whatsoever.
And they suck.
You put a compact fluorescent side by side with incandescent, take out this hoax, and I guarantee you what most people are going to buy, the incandescent.
Oh, this stuff frosts me.
I can't tell you.
Back to the phones.
Chris in Kennesaw, Georgia.
Welcome to the program.
Grace to have you here.
Hey, Rush, thanks for taking my call, Megaditto.
Two quick things before I get to my point.
Bill O'Reilly was clueless in that interview with Sarah Palin, and he proved it because he actually thought you said Epping Retard before Ram Emanuel.
And just imagine Amy Bishop if she was associated with the Tea Party movement and how the media would be running.
Oh, that's exactly my point.
It's exactly my point.
You're exactly right.
But the reason I was calling was, given your great legal mind and the fact that you come from a family of great legal minds, isn't there some way to bring people like Al Gore up on charges of fraud over this global warming thing?
I was just talking.
At some point, I think this is going to happen.
Well, we've got trillions in fraud in the so-called green technology, and it's even reached fraudulent legislation with the light bulbs that you were just talking about, not to mention cap and trade, which is far from dead, and the needless deaths that have occurred in these so-called hybrid cars that people have been duped into buying.
I know.
The list goes on.
Look at how children have been ill-educated, miseducated, lied to.
That's got to be first.
And I just, yeah, and it's big.
This is billions, if not trillions, of dollars that have been redirected to a bunch of commie bastards who have been running a hoax for the express purpose of enriching themselves and advancing the whole notion of socialism, big government, liberalism, whatever you want to call it.
Well, Rush, just one more thing in closing in regard to the T-word.
Just say total dove.
Just say turtle dove.
We'll know what you mean.
All right, from now on, turtle dove.
You're awesome.
Thanks for taking my call.
Freaking turtle doves.
Okay.
Oh, that's helpful advice from Chris in Kennesaw, Georgia.
He's got a good question.
The fraud here and what it's cost people.
The automobile industry, look at the cafe standards, all this crap that was designed to save the planet.
Not to end pollution, to stop the greenhouse, to stop the emissions of carbon dioxide.
All a giant big lie.
A lot of people, I probably shouldn't be public with this.
A lot of people ask me if I ever fear for myself on a security basis.
And not fear, you take steps.
We're heavily fortified wherever I happen to be.
But I am far more prepared to be fortified against people who I stand in the way of big money than I am afraid of people whose politics I disagree with.
We're talking trillions of dollars here on this global warming hoax.
And if we're able to bury this, a lot of people are going to not make a whole lot of money that they have in banking.
And that makes them really mad.
And they might also be sued big time, which will also make them very mad.
Ask Tony Soprano what he does to people who stand in the way of him making a score, for example.
Now, Al Gore has a partner in this carbon trading organization that has enriched him to the point right now.
Most recent number I read was $500 million.
His partner is David Blood, former Goldman Sachs.
And Gore and David Blood co-founded Generation Investment Management.
And now this is two years ago.
Former Goldman Sachs exec David Blood confounded Generation Investment Management with Gore, co-founded, and the firm now has nearly $1 billion under management.
Now that's two years ago.
Al Gore's $100 million makeover, current TV, Generation Investment Management.
Inconvenient truth, Generation Investment Management.
So this is, folks, this has been a scam and a hoax, and it's ensnared the typical doofuses like Leonardo DiCaprio and a lot of the Hollywood left, who are also in this for financial gain as well.
And here's how absurd this has got.
I briefly touched on this earlier today.
There's a new from California Catholic Daily.
Very timely to this discussion.
And Biden's out there today wearing carbon on his forehead.
He had the ash smear on his forehead today standing next to Obama.
From the California Catholic Daily, a new twist on Lent, California's bishops suggest reduce your carbon footprint for Lent.
In its latest public policy insights newsletter emailed to subscribers on February 12th, the Catholic Legislative Network is recommending a new way to observe Lent, which begins today.
The newsletter is produced by the California Catholic Conference, the lobbying arm of the state's bishops.
As the Lenten season arrives, the Catholic Coalition on Climate Change has provided Catholics, screws, and organizations with more tools and resources for its annual Catholic Climate Covenant, says the newsletter.
The coalition was formed three and a half years ago to help implement the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops' 2001 initiative, Global Climate Change, a plea for dialogue, prudence, and the common good.
Launched last year, the covenant revolves around the St. Francis Pledge, which correlates five key actions.
Pray, learn, assess, act, and advocate to the issues of the environment and poverty.
I mean, holy carp, folks, is nothing sacred?
They have infiltrated the Catholic Church.
Or maybe the Catholic Church has allowed itself to be infiltrated.
According to this newsletter, the Archdiocese of Washington's Environmental Outreach Committee has created a particularly useful new tool, a calendar.
And I have a compressed copy of it right there.
I'm not going to zoom in here.
I haven't got time.
That's the calendar.
A calendar that lists 40 carbon fasting measures individuals can take to reduce their carbon footprint.
The calendar contains suggestion for each of the 40 days of Lent beginning on Ash Wednesday today with remove one light bulb from your home and live without the light for the next 40 days.
What a cheap cop-out!
Other suggestions include turn down your thermostat by at least one degree.
Check windows and doors for a draft.
This is for Lent.
Making travel plans, consider getting there without flying is part of this calendar.
Check the tire pressure of your car today.
In other words, you can observe Lent according to these guys if you check the tire pressure of your car one day during the 40 days of Lent.
Learn about mountaintop removal mining.
Show reverence for life and for the earth today by obeying the speed limit.
This is not your father's Catholicism, folks.
The bishop's newsletter cited Daniel Misle, the executive director of the Catholic Climate Covenant, as saying the calendar is another way to care for creation and aid the poor.
How does this aid the poor?
It's challenging.
It asks for sacrifices and to be more mindful of patterns of consumption.
It's a new twist on Lent.
Oh, man.
As I said, holy carp.
Okay.
Back to the phones we go, ladies and gentlemen, to Jimmy, Pascagoula, Mississippi.
Thank you for calling.
You're next on the program.
Sir, great to have you here.
Thank you very much, a longtime listener.
Please indulge me to make my point.
If Obama and the demolition crats want to truly create jobs, there's over 250,000 structural steel bridges in the United States that fail at one per week.
The bridge in Minneapolis had just been inspected by the process that they used to inspection, which is just visual up until about a year ago, had just been inspected one month prior to its collapse up there on the Mississippi River in Minneapolis.
They could create so many jobs, putting people on the infrastructure of working on these bridges.
In the United States right now, 250,000 structural steel bridges that have fatigue and stress that most of them were built in the 50s and 60s, that trucks weighed a lot less, carried a lot less load.
The amount of traffic that went across these bridges was nowhere near the amount of traffic that was going across.
Kids in the cars back then were not nearly as fat, which didn't put as much pressure on these bridges.
Exactly.
And now there's a company out that has an electronic fatigue sensing device that can structurally test these bridges down to one one-hundredth of an inch.
I mean, that bridge was visually inspected, so all they did was go to most of the stress points, look at them, and say, hey, it's okay.
But what about the fatigue of the fact that those bridges were engineered and designed to only carry traffic?
Some bridges, if people truly knew how unsafe they were, they wouldn't much less drive a 2,000-pound car across it.
They wouldn't have to do it.
Hey, wait a minute, now, Jimmy, I thought the stimulus bill had fixed all these.
You're right.
Well, I mean, it's what the purpose was, to shovel-ready jobs, fix the infrastructure.
And Obama said today it's been a marvelous success.
He said it's a marvelous success, Jimmy.
Are you sure about your facts on this one?
Oh, yeah, I'm very sure because I'm going to tell you what.
Not only that, do you see steel workers and the Teamsters and all going to work right now?
Do you hear of any large quantities of workers working on these bridges?
No, you don't, because no one's doing it.
Well, you know, it's an excellent idea.
Jimmy, I think these bridges just have to be patient.
I think all that work that you're talking about comes in 2013.
I have no idea what Tiger is going to say Friday.
Big news, breaking news out there in the state-controlled media, Tiger Woods, to make a public announcement or statement on Friday.
What do most of the accused say?
I didn't do it.
I have no idea.
No, he can't say that.
I don't know what he's going to do.
I have no idea what he's going to say.
It's probably a national apology from distracting from Obama's agenda.
So who knows?
Ladies and gentlemen, let me tell you where to look to find the difference in a government.
By the way, Megan Kelly right now is doing a segment, a little legal segment there.
Some woman fell off a stripper pole and is suing at some place called Crunch Fitness.
Crunch Fitness.
Fell off the stripper pole.
And what is this, a fitness center?
It's not a strip joint.
It's a fitness center.
It's a new exercise.
Really, that's a new exercise rage and women pole stripping exercises?
Oh, well, that's what you get when you don't go to gyms.
You never know about these kinds of things.
Anyway, I'll tell you where to look to find the difference in a government stimulus bill that will help this economy versus Obama's, one that isn't.
Representative Eric Cantor and Senator David Vitter have introduced bills that cut through all these government barriers to job creation while preventing more increases in the deficit.
Now, the mainstream media may not give these bills the attention they should, but, but, the Heritage Foundation will showcase them for you and point out the differences between their smart ideas and what the Obama administration is doing.
Eric Cantor and Senator David, they're both great guys, and they realize the major reason for high unemployment right now is a lack of job creation in the private sector, not just the layoffs that we've seen.
And the Heritage Foundation has this information in a whole plethora of ways to stimulate the economy with the facts to back it up.
It's at askheritage.org.
This, my friends, is the organization that conservatives in and around Congress look to for sound economic reasoning, and you should too.
Oh, you're not a member of the Heritage Foundation?
It's not some elitist bunch of people.
It's for everybody who believes in our conservative principles.
You can join.
You should.
All you do is log on to askheritage.org and make yourself a member.
25 bucks.
Chump change.
And you'll be amazed.
All the information and ideas they have to offer.
Check it out.
AskHeritage.org.
Jerry in Long Island.
I'm glad you called, sir.
You're next in the Rush Lindbaugh program.
Hi.
Jerry in Long Island.
Is he there?
Oh, there you are.
Hi, Jerry.
Hey, buddy.
Hey, listen, man.
I've been a listener since the early 90s, ever since that Reader's Digest article about you years ago.
And I just, I don't know, my dad was a big conservative, and he passed away in 1990.
And I said to myself, what am I going to do now for information?
About a year later, I found you.
Well, God bless your dad and you.
Well, let me tell you something.
I'm a huge fan.
I've been listening.
I'm a contractor here on Long Island, and I got the AM on all the time when I'm putting tile down all day.
And I appreciate it.
Thank you very much.
And I'm glad that you're okay.
You had that little scare, you know, when you were in Hawaii, and I'm so glad you're okay.
Nobody, it was, you know, that was tough news to hear at first.
You're like a family member, even though you never met me.
And I just want you to know how much you appreciate it.
Thank you.
Thank you very, very, very much.
And the reason I'm calling is about O'Reilly.
I didn't like the way O'Reilly was coaxing Sarah to talk bad about you.
I mean, I don't appreciate that.
I like the Fox Channel, but I don't appreciate when O'Reilly does stuff like this, especially against you.
Because let's face it, if it wasn't for Rush Limbaugh, there'd be no Fox channel.
Cal Thomas said it last year, and I totally agree.
Well, that's a I appreciate your support on these kind of things, Jerry.
I really do.
But I understand why it happens, and I think you do too.
I do understand.
But Rush, these people have to give you the respect that is due to you.
Oh, no, no.
Look at it.
It's what I was talking about earlier, Jerry.
Exactly what I was talking about.
Everybody out there is trying to be the go-to guy.
They want to be perceived as the leader.
They want to be the one the media talks about whenever something X is said.
That's the person that said it, and that makes it.
This is why I don't like all these competing statements out there with all these different conservative groups because it's a competition to see who can be the leader and who can be the smartest guy in the room rather than advancing an agenda.
And that's what's necessary right now is advancing an agenda with a simple understanding of what the agenda is, not an argument about who the smartest guy or the most powerful person in the room is.
Because we all know who that is anyway.
Absolutely.
I know who it is too.
That's why I listen, bro.
Thank you, Jerry.
I appreciate it very much.
San Diego's next.
This is Mark.
You're on the EIB Network, sir.
Hello.
Hi, Rush, Tittos.
Hey, you're the voice of our founding fathers out there.
I have two questions.
Do you think this is the end of socialism we're seeing with FDR and the lack of money for Social Security, Medicare, and then the subprime mortgages that led to the bank collapse, which was for a socialist cause, too?
I hope so.
Let me give you some brief history.
In 1992, Ronald Reagan said Clinton agenda, this massive socialism, which is what it was when they started, won't work.
Just like communism, it will implode on the weight of its own immorality.
There have been four liberal Democrat administrations elected in my lifetime, and each one of them has eventually been rejected after one term and sent packing.
And the reason is the American people, when they finally find out what these compassionate Democrats actually implement, want no part of it.
But they do get elected.
There are cycles.
Every 16 or 20 years, they do get elected.
Sometimes a little bit more frequently than that, but they do get elected.
And I think largely the reason for it is that the Republican Party lays down.
The Republican Party forgets what got it elected and starts turning into inside the beltway elitism itself.
And so people say, screw these people.
I'm throwing them out.
This is why.
This is why I say that the future of this country needs to be focused on telling and teaching as many people about ideology.
All we have to do is take the past year of the Obama administration and say, this is what you're going to get every time you elect a Democrat.
Any Democrat.
This is what you're going to get anytime, every time you elect a liberal.
Every time.
No matter how bad the Republicans get, they are nowhere near this incompetent or dangerous.
But every time you elect a Democrat, this is what you're going to...
The last Democrat about whom this couldn't be said, and it was a close call, was JFK.
But FDR overreach, they always overreach.
What has to happen to make this rejection permanent is that conservatives, genuine constitutional conservatives, have to take over the Republican Party.
They cannot go third party.
They cannot abandon.
They have to take it over.
Because these cycles are killing the country.
Ideology.
Teach liberalism.
Teach what the Democrat Party is and tell people, this is no different.
This is just worse because this never had a more radical bunch than this guy.
But this is what you're going to get every damn time you elect them.
Well, look at this.
The governor of California, well, the husband of Jajagabor is going to run for governor.
His name is Prince Friedrich van Anholt.
And what he wants to do is legalize marijuana and tax it.
He wants to open the borders to Mexico for workers and tax them.
He wants to adjust fees from the Department of Motor Vehicles and promote natural gas and other alternative energies.
He's going to stay home and promote California products, including marijuana.
▲
Export Selection