All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 15, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
34:58
February 15, 2010, Monday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Yeah, hang on a minute here, folks.
I'm listening to Evan by here.
Just be patient.
I'll be right back.
Just let the theme play there for just a second.
What does he believe?
What is this crazy?
Ah, screw it.
All my life.
I've been privileged to serve the people of Indiana.
He's running out of there with $13 million in his campaign war chest.
That's another reason why.
These guys are dropping like flies.
That's all I had to hear, Snerdley.
I didn't hear the part about bipartisan gridlock being so disappointing he has to cash out with 13 mil.
Back we are, 800-282-2882.
If you want to be on the program, email address, lrushball at eibnet.com.
I'll tell you.
So Tiger gets out of the sex rehab place around February 5th, it is said, 10 days ago, and moves back to Orlando, Windermere, a couple of miles in a house a couple miles from the wife, Elon.
It is said that the marriage are trying to put it back together there, but that it's fragile.
And in Fox News, Jocelyn James, well-known porn star, says that she miscarried one of the surprise pregnancies and aborted the other.
Tiger Woods was the impregnator.
Tiger Woods allegedly impregnated his porn star mistress twice, both times when his wife was also pregnant.
This is according to an interview with a woman set to air sometime today.
Jocelyn James, star of such adult classics as big-breasted nurses and my sex teacher number 12 and cream box babies, said her lengthy and steamy affair with Tiger always involved unprotected sex.
Using protection was never talked about, the actress told U.S. TV show Inside edition.
It was never protected.
Jocelyn James, the well-known porn star, carried on the affair with Woods from 06 to 09, said she miscarried in her first pregnancy at about the same time that Elon Nordogren was giving birth to the daughter, June 18, 2007.
She said she aborted her next tiger pregnancy close to the February 8th, 2009 birth of Woods' son, Charlie.
Woods was never told about, also he's just learning this today too.
Woods was never told about either pregnancy, she said, claiming she just didn't want to ruin anything.
I'm sorry.
She didn't want to ruin anything.
Thanks for sharing it now here, Jocelyn.
The buxom adult film star said she was close to breaking the news to Woods, but said she chickened out.
Actually, the day I was going to tell him I had a miscarriage.
After I lost the baby, I didn't want to talk about it.
But the miscarriage fueled her desire to be with Woods.
I got more emotionally attached.
She then says she feels bad for Elon.
She didn't deserve this, and she didn't deserve being humiliated.
So why are you going public here, Jocelyn?
Man, oh man, I'll tell you what.
Okay, let's move on here, folks.
After, what was it?
Creambox babies number, whatever, my sex teacher number, whatever.
Oh, you're right.
I forgot.
It's a screw-a-holiday, and there are youngsters listening today.
I should have given an advance warning.
I'm sorry about that, parents.
We're not here to shock people.
I should have given you a usual 5-4-3-2.
He's still talking.
Hang on, let me listen to this just.
I'll just mumble so that we don't do anything.
I just want to hear what he's saying here.
Just hang on for one quick sec here, Paul.
Public would be surprised and pleased to know that.
Well-huh.
What about it?
Oh.
Oh, yeah, right.
Okay, that's it.
I don't need to hear anymore.
They're hardworking and devoted to public service, and you'll miss them.
Well, you don't have to leave.
But, yes, Nerdley tells me kids get this stuff in school anyway.
They're not shocked.
Some cities, the teachers are porn stars.
I had forgotten that.
You know, but you're probably right about that.
Snow days deprive many kids of food.
You remember back the budget battle in 1995 where the Democrats went out there and said that Republicans with school lunch cuts and there weren't any wanted to starve kids.
And people acted as though it was truthful.
And Democrats had little kids write cards to Republicans in Washington.
Can you please don't starve me?
If you cut the school lunch program, I will starve to death.
I can't learn anything if I'm starving.
They actually sent these cards.
Now, from a tear-jerked Associated Press, snow days deprive many kids of food.
Tens of thousands of children miss out on free or reduced-price lunch.
This is from Tacoma Park, Maryland.
As back-to-back snowstorms shuttered scruples for the week across the mid-Atlantic states, parents fretted about lost learning time.
Administrators scheduled makeup days and teachers posted assignments online.
But Maria Kaplan worried about a more fundamental problem.
How would students eat?
This is what we've got.
This, Governor Wilder, this is the kind of foolishness and tomfoolery we've got to change.
How kids at home were worried about whether they're going to eat at home?
You are of the opinion that parents will not feed their kids lunch?
Are you of the opinion that the kids don't know where the refrigerator is?
Or where the nearest Mickey D's is?
Or Chuck E. Cheese?
Are these kids so woefully inept that they can't find a bag of Ruffles Have Ridges in the cabinet?
What in the world is going on here?
The two snowstorms that pummeled the region, leaving more than three feet of snow in some areas, deprived tens of thousands of children from Virginia to Pennsylvania of the free or reduced-priced screw lunch that may be their only nutritious meal of the day.
The nonprofits that try to meet the need when scruple is not in session also closed their doors for much of the week, leaving many families looking at bare cupboards.
And many parents working hourly jobs are unable to earn any money during the week as the snow forced businesses to close.
Well, the only thing missing here is how many people died of starvation.
Maybe if we keep reading, we'll get the number.
Kaplan is a food services supervisor for Montgomery County Public Schruels.
This is the previously mentioned Marla Kaplan, where some 43,000 children are eligible for free or reduced-price lunches.
Some also get breakfast, dinner, and bags of staple foods to take them home for the weekend.
Staple foods?
The snow days meant that children would get none of that until Tuesday because scruels are closed.
Do you realize what this means?
We have an epidemic of 43,000 starving kids out there for the last eight or nine days.
They haven't eaten because the schools have been shut.
Well, maybe we don't need obesity programs, Michelle My Bell.
We just need more snow days.
If you want to cure the childhood obesity problem, we've just learned what it is.
Shut down the schools.
Shut them down for a month and buy-buy obesity problem, right?
You realize how silly this is?
And this is the kind of people running the public school system.
Oh my God, 43,000 children may be starving because we can't give them reduced price or free lunches in school because it's closed because of snow.
And of course, their idiot parents can't even feed them.
Never occurs to the parents to go to the grocery store or stock up.
And yet we've got this childhood obesity problem.
Do I want to read any more of this?
Well, I don't know what the parents eat.
Apparently, whatever they're eating, they're not sharing with the kids.
I'll tell you that the parents in Maryland and Pennsylvania must be some of the stingiest, cheapest, meanest parents that we got in the whole country.
Because there are 43,000 kids that have not had lunch in eight days because the school isn't open.
This is a national, this is a scandal.
43,000 starving kids.
Pennsylvania, Maryland, probably New York and New Jersey too, because the schools aren't open.
What are the kids doing?
Are they sitting inside?
Shoveling snow?
Ha ha ha ha.
Hardly.
And then look at this story, a companion story also from another tear-jerked Associated Press writer.
U.S. schools face severe budget holes.
This is from San Francisco.
The nation's public scruples are falling under severe financial stress as states slash education spending and drain federal stimulus slush fund money that staved off deep recession and classroom cuts and widespread job losses.
Scruel districts have already suffered big budget cuts since the recession began two years ago, but experts say the cash crunch will get a lot worse as states run out of stimulus slush fund dollars.
I predicted this.
They result in many hard-hit districts, more teacher layoffs, larger class sizes, smaller paychecks, fewer electives, extracurricular activities, and decimated summer school programs, not to mention a new round of starving kids.
Because that's okay, LeMit, because of oh now, do you think the question ever enters anybody's mind what happens when the money is gone?
Seriously, folks, how I thought all the scruples crumbled years ago.
I thought that's why we needed the stimulus in the first place because the scruples were crumbling.
Now, how is this possible?
Didn't we just use the stimulus to save all of those teacher jobs?
You see what happens when they run out of stimulus, folks?
See, here's the thing: people don't have jobs, so they don't pay taxes.
And taxes, in part, support schools.
So it's jobs that are needed, not a slush fund, not small business tax increases.
We don't need more stimulus money.
We need people working.
Two stories about crumbling schools and starving kids because of eight days without school lunch.
Rush Limbaugh and President's Day.
We'll be back right after this.
And we are back, El Rushbo, serving humanity simply by showing up here on President's Day.
All non-essential people are not at work today.
Only those who matter, like me, are at work.
800-282-2882, if you want to be on the program, I was not making up these numbers.
The source for this is directorblue.blogspot.com.
This is actual data.
These are actual numbers from the state of New Jersey where the newly elected governor has announced a budget freeze.
And of course, the Democrats are just stuck pigs.
How's this for an investment?
As a public union state employee, you pay a total of $124,000 into your pension plan over your work life, which means you retire in New Jersey at age 49.
You have $124,000 deducted from the sum total of your paychecks over the period of time you work.
That equals $124,000.
When you retire at age 49, you receive $3.3 million in pension payments, $500,000 in health care benefits, a total of $3.8 million in total on a $124,000 investment or this, another actual number.
You pay a total of $62,000 towards a pension plan and nothing for health care, medical, dental, and vision coverage over your working career.
When you retire, age 49, you're paid $1.4 million in pension and $215,000 in health benefits.
That's a total of $1.6 million on a $62,000 investment.
These are real world examples from New Jersey's crushing public sector union retirement plans paid for by the state's taxpayers.
And the governor, Chris Christie, is demanding drastic actions to prevent New Jersey from falling off the precipice and into full-fledged bankruptcy.
When I see stories like this, and I've always known the Democrats are inexorably tied to public employee unions and so forth, even I, the all-knowing, all-caring, all-feeling, all-understanding Maha Rushi, was still shocked to learn just how deeply in bed the entire public employee union segment is with the Democrat Party and what it's really all about.
And it is.
I've never had any doubts about why unions unilaterally support Democrats.
I just had no idea the extent to which they had been purchased.
I had no idea that this kind of stuff actually happened.
It's this kind of information, folks, that is going to trigger an uprising demanding elected officials rein in tax dollars, propping up this kind of crap.
I mean, this is unsupportable.
It's unsustainable.
And this is what the Democrats have done.
And it's not just New Jersey.
It's California, any number of places.
And it's killing these states.
There are seven states that are facing true financial hardships.
And Florida is one of them.
California is another.
New Jersey is big.
They all have populations of over 8 million people.
No, well, that may be, let me find the story with that.
But nevertheless, they have these obligations that they're not going to be able to meet, especially with the unemployment numbers that exist in all of these states.
And the stimulus money, this is what the stimulus money was for, was to keep this kind of thing going.
That's why all these pictures are crumbling schools.
They're still crumbling.
All the unemployment keeps going up.
The stimulus slush fund was supposed to have shovel-ready jobs.
That's not what it was about.
It was and is a slush fund.
And the majority of it's going to be spent this year on just this kind of stuff, making sure that these public employee unions in the states, teachers, whatever they are, don't get laid off and don't get fired or what have you.
And it is breaking the bank.
Now, this is the kind of stuff that ought to be in stump speeches for all Republicans running in 2010.
As long as this exists, it's indefensible.
This is tipping point kind of stuff.
Anyway, I've had diarrhea of the mouth today because so much has been going on.
Let me grab a call.
Tracy in Jones Creek, Georgia.
Great to have you on the program.
Hi.
Hey, Rush.
It's actually Johns Creek, Georgia.
And I just want to call and say I love your Amnesty for Warmers.
Well, somebody has to do it.
Somebody has to.
These people have been duped.
If you're just joining us, folks, the head honcho at this East Anglia University, Phil Jones, has finally admitted that there hasn't been any warming since 1995 around the world.
There has been no global warming, man-made or otherwise.
It's all been a hoax.
The hockey stick graph is a hoax.
It was warmer in the medieval period when we didn't have any progress at all than it is today.
It's all a 100% hoax.
And we need an amnesty plan for the average people who have been duped into believing this for all of these years.
It's like the Perot voters.
They hated my guts, but I welcomed them back with a big heart, open mind, and great compassion.
The same thing's going to have to happen because there are billions of these people around the world who've been duped.
What do you like about it?
Well, I just wanted to add to it.
I think that you need to initiate now a cash for carbon credits program for our disheartened environmentalists.
I'm not going to try to get the environmentalists.
We're never going to get them.
It's like the communists have never admitted that it's bad, even after the wall went down.
But we're not going to get the 20 to 30% wacko people.
Al Gore's not going to recant.
I don't care about them.
I'm worried about the children.
The children who believe that polar bears on little three feet of ice is a melting glacier and that they're all dying or that driving a car is destroying the planet.
These are the people we have to get back.
Well, I agree.
And I am thrilled that our children do not need to come home from school any longer in tears.
Well, it's not going to happen overnight because these people, the teachers and so forth, are not going to give up on this because it's not about global warming.
It's about advancing socialism or Marxism, whatever you want to call it.
It's about advancing government control over people's lives.
And even though the architects and the head honchos have admitted now that it's a fraud, doesn't mean that teachers are going to give it up because it's a way to get somewhere that they want.
Obama's not going to get it.
I guarantee you, Obama's still going to push cap and trade.
He's still going to be out there talking about the seas need to reduce.
They need to bring down the sea levels.
He's not going to lives in an alternative universe, a universe of lies.
So just because these guys have admitted it, it is big because no communist has ever admitted that communism failed.
No communist has ever said communism was a hoax, that it never amounted to what its promise was.
But these head honchos at East Anglia University have done that.
So anyway, I have high hopes.
I mean, this has been a burning issue of mine for 25 years.
Peter and Cape Cod, great to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Hey, hello, Rush.
Long time.
And I'm calling greetings from the thankfully former home of Camelot.
Camel Not.
Right.
Well, today's Camelnot, right.
But I was calling, what I was calling about was the terrorist trials.
And the point I'd like to make is that these Navy SEALs who were supposedly smacked terrorists, they have to be tried in a military court, but the terrorists can be tried in a civilian court.
Yeah, why do you think that is?
Well, this is pure politics.
Oh, it's more than politics.
Well, as you say, it's a state of mind.
It's animosity toward the military.
It's animosity.
It's hatred, distrust, whatever you want to say, of the military.
This is Obama and Eric Holder's way of trying to say to the world, we know why you hated us.
Bush did all this, but we don't want the Muslim world hating us.
It's our military that's the problem, and we're going to show you.
And it's just, it's absurd and it's obscene.
And even that's falling apart.
Look, I'm glad you called, Peter.
Thanks so much.
A quick break.
We'll be right back after this.
Don't go away.
Okay, a couple things.
I got this.
You got Somebody 23 ready to go, Mr. Broadcast Engineer, Evan Bay, who's getting out of Dodge with $13 million in his campaign cash fund.
Sorry, I forgot to turn the DittoCam back on.
Evan Bayh, this is at his press conference this afternoon, explaining why it is or what it is that's driven him out of town with his $13 million campaign war chest in tow.
After all of these years, my passion for service to our fellow citizens is undiminished.
My desire to do so by serving in Congress has waned.
For some time, I've had a growing conviction that Congress is not operating as it should.
There is much too much partisanship and not enough progress, too much narrow ideology and not enough practical problem solving.
Even at a time of enormous national challenge, the people's business is not getting done.
Well, this is what we heard he was going to say, and now he's going out there and said it, proving once again that the guy is a dim bulb.
They had 60 votes in his party in the Senate.
I mean, that is a super majority.
How in the world do you have partisan gridlock when the other party can't stop diddly squat?
And what is this business about the people's business isn't getting done?
Thank God the people's business, as designed by Obama and the Democrats, ought not get done.
And it isn't getting done not because of partisan bickering.
It isn't getting done because the people of this country do not want it, Senator Bayh.
They don't want Obamacare.
They don't want cap and tax.
They don't want cap and trade.
They don't want any of this.
And that's why it isn't happening.
It's not because of gridlock.
These people try my patience, snurdily.
They really, and it's a challenge here not to erupt in pure profanity when I hear, because I'm, you know, I'm in a great mood here today.
I'm in a great mood most every day, but it's getting increasingly difficult, folks, to hang around or be subjected to idiots.
And I'm talking about suffering fools.
I don't do it well.
I don't have a whole lot of, that's why I could never be a diplomat.
I could never tell somebody who's lost their mind that they have holes in their head instead.
You know, that's a great definition of diplomacy.
Yeah, somebody, somebody that's lost their mind and has holes in their head, you don't say that.
You have a very open mind, a lot of holes in it.
I can never do that.
You're an idiot.
You're an absolute.
I'm not specifically referring to Senator Bayh here.
I'm just talking about suffering fools in general.
Okay, back to the phones.
Jennifer in Floyds Knobs, Indiana.
Great to have you on the program.
Welcome.
Thank you so much for taking my call, Rush.
I'm calling because my daughter's third-grade teacher is making them take a four-day, one-hour each day eco-drama, which is teaching them to keep their hometown clean and green as part of their science.
Well, I'll make sure I heard you right here.
A four-day one-day eco-drama.
For four days, one hour each day.
One hour each day.
For four days a week.
For four days total.
It was supposed to be last week, but it snowed.
And the teacher gets a certificate or something, something the teacher has to do?
No, she got it approved by the school board.
But she's making the students do it for science.
Now, is the premise here that there's global warming?
There's really nothing wrong with cleaning up messes, and there's nothing wrong with being against pollution.
Nobody wants to purposely pollute, but it's the auspices that is this being done to save the planet?
Well, one of their vocabulary words is green living.
Yeah, okay.
Well, that's not good because what that means is one little sheet of toilet paper.
Help us.
All kinds of, you know, weird wacko stuff like that.
So how's your kid dealing with this?
Well, my husband sent an email to both the principal and the teacher saying we did not want our daughter in it in this class because we know what where it's going.
So the teacher made a point of saying, well, what am I supposed to do with your daughter?
And I said, gladly put her someplace quiet to learn, but to do her work.
But she is saying it's approved by the school board, so therefore it's part of their science grade.
So she has to attend this stuff?
That's what they're saying.
Well, no.
You're worried the kid's going to not get a good grade if you pull her out of this.
Oh, we're still polling her.
We're still pulling her.
I'm just asking you for, you know, advice on how to respond to the teacher who is offended by us not wanting her.
It's very simple.
You tell the teacher that it is a hoax, and you tell the teacher that the primary architect of this has admitted that there has been no global warming, man-made or otherwise, since 1995.
That the data was all made up.
It's all over the European press.
The state-controlled media in the United States will not report this or hasn't reported it.
But you tell the teacher that she's teaching them a lie.
That if she's teaching global warming, man-made global warming, that she is teaching a hoax, and you will not put up with it.
I mean, that's what I would do.
It's easy for me to say.
Oh, oh, well, we don't have a problem.
We'll help her.
We're planning on doing that same thing.
I just wanted to make sure that you back to what I said because we've done this before.
Last year, they were showing global warming videos in the library, and we said no.
And the only class that didn't get to see the second part were my two daughters' classes.
Well, good.
I would continue to stand up to them.
I've heard horror stories.
I've repeated them.
Here in Florida in Haskruel, the parents were told they had to come watch Al Gore's movie with the students, or the students might suffer grade punishment.
The parents had to come watch it.
And it's a lie.
It's a full-fledged lie.
You don't have teachers anymore.
You have propagandists and activists.
True.
And you have to stand up to them.
If you want your kid not to become indoctrinated, if you want your child to actually learn truth and fact, you have to stand up to this kind of stuff.
And do you have other options than this school?
Is this a public school or private school?
It's a public school, but I'm strongly going toward homeschooling this one child until she's out of elementary school at least after this school year because of this.
My other two children are strong with knowing this, but my younger daughter is still kind of young and absorbs everything the teachers tell her.
This is a revolution, I think, that's going to start on this issue and a lot of things.
There's going to be it in November, but there's going to be an open rebellion against all of this unchecked liberalism, which is not education.
It's indoctrination.
It is activism.
And more and more parents, when they learn the truth of what's happening and the lies that their kids are being taught under the impression that it's truth, people aren't going to put up with it.
So I applaud you.
If you've got the courage to stand up to them, I don't think you can go wrong, but we're talking about your child's education here.
No, we educate her on this.
The school's not educating.
Exactly right.
Exactly right.
Well, look, I'm glad you called.
Thanks very much.
Thank you for taking my call.
Oh, anytime.
Call back anytime.
We're always here, even on holidays.
I always like this song.
Bachman Turner Overdrive, which is a great name for a group, by the way.
And you ain't seen it yet.
Part of the increasingly popular bumper music rotation here at the one and only EIB network.
This is great.
Scott Brown has responded to Plugs Biden, Plugs Biden all over television.
He and Cheney had this back and forth.
We've got the audio on it, but frankly, Biden bores me.
Maybe we could, Cookie, hold those Biden and Cheney bites over for tomorrow.
I may want to use them.
But on Slay the Nation, Bob Schieffer interviewed Plugs, said, let's talk a little bit about the trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who was scheduled to be held in New York.
The attorney general said they're going to do that.
He thought this would set an example for the world.
And then suddenly, after the election, Scott Brown in Massachusetts, who said we ought to be spending money catching terrorists, not spending money to make sure they had a lawyer to defend them, and talking about civilian trials and all of that, suddenly Mayor of New York said, we don't need to do this.
Look, I can tell you two things.
I don't know whether the news center from Massachusetts understands when you get tried in a military tribunal, you get a lawyer, too.
So it's good if we begin to learn the facts about all these things.
You get a lawyer whether you're in a military tribunal or whether you're in a federal court.
Number one.
Well, this is the typical condescending arrogance that you get from the left.
The difference is that Scott Brown has fired back at this.
He thinks Bryce President Biden was off base when he suggested that the Massachusetts Republican get his facts straight on the legal procedures for military tribunals.
It was insulting, said Brown, who frequently jabbed the administration during his Senate campaign for giving suspected terrorists legal representation.
Brown said he's particularly incensed by Biden's remarks because he served in the Massachusetts Army National Guard for more than 30 years, is currently the Guard's top defense attorney in New England.
I know the military rules and regulations and procedures from A to Z, Scott Brown said.
This is in Politico today.
He said he was spending time with his younger daughter, Ariana, who was home from Syracuse University Sunday when he learned that Biden had taken a swing at him.
I was actually surprised, Brown said.
When Biden swore him into office, they had a nice chat.
Yeah, we'll learn from this, Scott.
Vice President told him he could visit the vice president presidential residence.
I would have thought that he would have reached out personally rather than go through the media.
I'm not quite sure what the message to me was, but I felt that it was important enough to respond.
Scott Brown, not taking.
I like it.
Mary in Lexington, Kentucky, welcome to the EIB network.
Great to have you here.
Hi, Rush.
It's an honor to talk to you.
My family and I love you.
And we're raising seven Rush babies.
So anyway, I was wondering how you think how Nancy Pelosi is going to be paving the way for reconciliation, because I really don't understand reconciliation very well.
Well, it is misleading.
There's no such thing as reconciliation in the House.
There's reconciliation in the Senate.
What Pelosi's talking about is accepting the Senate bill.
The problem with the healthcare right now is there are two bills.
Pelosi has one of her own, and the Senate has one.
And the Senate, in order to get it passed, watered down a lot of the extremism in the House bill.
They've taken a lot of stuff out that Pelosi and the liberals in the House wanted.
So, but they want a bill.
So, what she's saying is that they should use reconciliation in the Senate.
Now, reconciliation is the one exception to requiring 60 votes. to shut off debate and vote on a bill.
And that's called cloture.
And the one exception is budgets, because the budget is constitutionally required.
So the Senate rules allow for reconciliation, meaning we only need 51 votes to pass a budget in the Senate, as opposed to 60 on every other piece of legislation.
So what she's saying is the Senate should use reconciliation to pass the Senate bill and send that over to the House, and that she would then sign it or pass it on, and they would send that to Obama, and then he would sign it, and then they would send it all back, and they'd start making changes in future amendments or other pieces of legislation.
But it's a trick because they don't have the votes under normal procedures to get the bill out of the Senate.
So she's saying, go ahead and use reconciliation, send it over here, we'll rubber stamp it, send it up to Obama, and then we'll start adding what we like later on after reconciliation has been used.
Does that help you understand it?
Yes, that does.
Thank you so much.
My pleasure.
That's, see, folks, this is what I mean.
Become, like me, the go-to person in your clique of friends.
When anybody has a question, you be the one that has the answer.
Just make sure the answer is right.
And then if you, and the best way to become the go-to person is just listen to the show every day and go to my website, which is encyclopedic.
I don't plug it much because, you know, I get, I don't know, I get nervous plugging my own stuff, but it really is a great website, especially for members.
So much there that value is one of the best in the country.
What can I say?
And the website people kind of get frustrated with me because I don't plug it a lot.
I feel a little nervous about it.
But we're very proud of it.
It is a great website, and it has encyclopedic data.
And by that, I mean archives, essential stack of stuff, research opportunities, capabilities, transcriptions of so many of these programs and audio and video versions as well.
Got to take a brief time out.
We'll come back and close it up after this.
A teachable moment.
You know, whenever there's a mass killing out there, the drive-by media, state-controlled media, always try to blame it on some right-wing nut who may have been listening to talk radio.
Have you heard the drive-by media do that with this left-wing nut that murdered these professors in Alabama and her own brother in 1986?
Have you ever heard them blame this on some left-wing nut that might have influenced her?
Probably not.
She's a left-wing nut to begin with and didn't need any influencing, but probably had some anyway.
Folks, we'll be back here tomorrow when the rest of you go back to work.
See you then.
▲
Export Selection