Rush Limbaugh Program - February 11, 2010, Thursday, Hour #2

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 11, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program

33:59

February 11, 2010, Thursday, Hour #2

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	The views expressed by the host on this program documented to be almost always right now, 99.5% of the time, Rush Limbaugh and the Excellence in Broadcasting Network telephone number if you want to join us, 800-282-2882.
	If you're just joining us, and you missed a sparkling stellar first hour, I can't possibly repeat it all.
	That's why there is Rush Limbaugh.com.
	One thing I do want to remind you of is that the Obama administration says that Americans have no reasonable expectation of privacy regarding the location and perhaps the contents of their cell phones and cell phone conversations.
	This is the same administration that went just belly aching all across the country for years over warrantless wiretab searches.
	And now the Obama Justice Department says that Americans have this is from CNET News.com, that the American people have no reasonable expectation of privacy, quote unquote.
	As to the location of their cell phone and perhaps the contents of their cell phone calls.
	I'm not gonna let this go.
	We're gonna move on to other things.
	We're gonna get to jobs bill here in just a second.
	I gotta go back.
	Audio soundbite number twelve, and we've dug up a couple others from our archive.
	Mike, they're number 2223 today.
	Here is Obama.
	I'm sorry, Biden last night on Larry King Alive talking about Iraq.
	I am very optimistic about about Iraq.
	I think it's gonna be one of the great achievements of this administration.
	You're gonna see 90,000 American troops come marching home by the uh end of the summer.
	You're gonna see a stable government in Iraq that is actually moving toward a representative government.
	Everything he mentions he inherited.
	Every last word of that is the result of the Bush Cheney administration.
	The troops coming home, the stable Iraq government, and yet this could be one of the great achievements of this administration.
	Why do we believe anything these people say ever?
	Why do we even grant them the notion that they are sane?
	This is worse than Chutzpah, folks.
	This is this is insulting everybody's intelligence.
	From December 26th, 2006, an associated press story, Biden foul vows to fight any Iraq uh troop boost.
	This was prior to the surge by Anne Flahortie, AP writer.
	Senator Joe Biden, the incoming chairman, Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said he will fight President Bush if the administration decides to send more U.S. troops to Iraq.
	Biden, who has his eye on the Democrat presidential nomination, also warned that if Congressional Republicans do not join him in speaking out against Bush, that they will suffer in the 2008 elections.
	I just think it's the absolute wrong strategy.
	Biden said Tuesday of an increase in troops, that very increase now he's claiming one of the great achievements of this administration.
	Biden said, Now you'll remember this when I tell you, he came out of the meeting.
	He's talking to the press.
	He said he delivered this message in a recent meeting.
	He told Mr. Bush, Mr. President, this is your war.
	This is your war.
	Let's move forward from 2006 to 2007.
	April 27th, Columbia, South Carolina, at Jim Clyburn's annual fish fry.
	Senator Biden mingling with audience members and an unidentified audience member says, When the president kills that bill on the first, what's going to be the next version of that bill that you all are going to send him?
	First thing I'm going to do when he vetoes that bill is not going to take out that money for those MRAPs, those vehicles that will save lives over there.
	The idea we're not, I got to keep going to that view.
	We're not building these new Humbies with a beast shake thing.
	It's just crack, man.
	Kids are buying, don't happen to die.
	The second thing is, we're going to slap it on his throat.
	Second thing we're going to do is shove it down his throat.
	Joe Biden, April 27, 2007, go back to Soundbite Number 12 once again, where Biden said this last night on Larry King Alive.
	I am very optimistic about Iraq.
	I think it's going to be one of the great achievements of this administration.
	You're going to see 90,000 American troops come marching home by the uh end of the summer.
	You're going to see a stable government in Iraq that is actually moving toward a representative government.
	Everything he's taking credit for, he inherited.
	He opposed everything that led to that which he now takes credit for, and he actively fought it and said he was going to ram it down Bush's throat.
	On Meet the Press, September 9th, 2007, Tim Russert said, General Petraeus said in a letter to his troops, my sense is that we have achieved tactical momentum, have wrested the initiative from our enemies in a number of areas of Iraq.
	We are in chart a long way from the goal line, but we do have the ball.
	We're driving down the field.
	Is that what you expect him to say tomorrow?
	He's dead flat wrong.
	The fact of the matter is that there is that this uh this idea of these security gains we made have had no impact on the underlying sectarian dynamic.
	None.
	None.
	Whatsoever.
	Can anybody envision a central government made up of Sunni Shi and Kurds that's going to gain the trust and respect of 27 million Iraqis?
	There have been some tactical gains, but they have no ultimate bearing at this point on the prospect of there being a political settlement in Iraq that would allow American troops to come home without leaving chaos behind.
	Uh, folks, this is serious stuff because that's exactly what happened.
	It is exactly what happened.
	And yet Biden, I want to play these two sound bites again.
	I don't want you to forget this, because that sound bite you just heard is exactly what happened.
	Biden said there was no way it would happen.
	So here he is last night again on Larry King alive, uh, maybe claiming that Iraq.
	Are you are you anti-war people on the left?
	Are you hearing this?
	Your guys are now claiming credit for a great achievement in their administration, the Iraq war?
	Here's what Biden said.
	I am very optimistic about about Iraq.
	I think it's gonna be one of the great achievements of this administration.
	You're gonna see 90,000 American troops come marching home by the uh end of the summer.
	You're gonna see a stable government in Iraq that is actually moving toward a representative government.
	I mean, this is the guy who wanted to cut the country in three.
	Okay, so most great achievement.
	Great achievement of this administration, Iraq.
	90,000 coming home stable government.
	Meet the press, September 9th, 2007.
	He's dead flat wrong.
	The fact of the matter is that there is that this uh this idea of these security gains we made have had no impact on the underlying sectarian dynamic.
	None.
	None.
	Whatsoever.
	Can anybody envision a central government made up of Sunni Shian Kurds that's gonna gain the trust and respect of 27 million Iraqis?
	There have been some tactical gains, but they have no ultimate bearing at this point on the prospect of there being a political settlement in Iraq that would allow American troops to come home without leaving chaos behind.
	It's exactly what happened.
	It is precisely what happened.
	He inherited all of this that he says constitutes a great achievement for his stupid administration.
	Every damn bit of the policy from George W. Bush and Cheney, these are the guys that said Petraeus is a liar.
	These are the guys supported at New York Times ad, saying the surge would never work.
	Harry Reid, this war is lost.
	You military people, I hope you're hearing this, because these are the people in your administration, your country running your show.
	These are the most dishonest, the most diabolical people that have led this country in my lifetime.
	They are sick, mentally unstable.
	I don't know who their friends are anymore.
	We were talking about this at the top of the hour.
	The gays in the military, they're not happy with them anymore.
	The Hispanics are kind of docile.
	Where's the immigration bill?
	Uh Al Sharpton and uh and and uh by the way, yesterday might have been uh picture being taken.
	Oh, take it.
	Let me pose for the picture here again.
	I will not lose my train of thought.
	Okay.
	You know, I always say that Obama is the least experienced, least qualified guy.
	Whenever he walks into a room, yesterday is an exception.
	Al Sharpton walked into the Oval Office.
	Uh, along with uh Ben jealous of the NAA L C P. I think in that case, Obama, it's a close call.
	But Obama might have been a little bit more experienced and qualified, depending on what was discussed.
	But these guys are upset because there haven't been any jobs in the in the black community.
	I mean, who on his the the unions are ticked off?
	Wall Street's ticked off.
	Every b every member of his coalition is mad at him or ambivalent right now.
	But I mean, you you people are the the anti-war Bush is evil is what propelled this guy to the White House, and now you guy and Biden are claiming credit for a brilliant achievement in Iraq.
	Many people have wondered where Al Gore is during all of this snow and cold weather.
	He hasn't submitted himself to questions.
	Remember, my friends, our cameras, microphones are everywhere, and we found him.
	Yes, uh, back we are.
	Rush Limbaugh again having regained my composure from once again being exposed to a genuine fool.
	Joe Biden, a genuine embarrassment.
	And he had the in the same show after these outrageous uh foolish comments about the great Iraq achievement of the Obama administration.
	Larry King says, Sarah Palin, what do you say?
	Well, you know, it's it's sort of like uh some of the comments made are just so far, sort of out there.
	I I I just don't know where they come from.
	Uh you don't understand common sense then.
	Well, he's so some of the comments are so far out there.
	You mean like you claiming credit?
	A great achievement, your Iraq policy, or how about this?
	September 9th, 2008, Columbia, Missouri.
	Uh uh Chuck Graham, State Senator is here.
	Stand up, Chuck, let him see you.
	Oh, God love you.
	What am I talking about?
	I tell you what, you're making everybody else stand up, though, pal.
	I tell you what, stand up for Chuck.
	That was uh Democrat Missouri State Senator Chuck Graham is in a wheelchair.
	And uh by stand up, Chuck get him here.
	Oh my God, let me what am I talking about?
	Everybody stand up.
	Stand up for Chuck.
	Chuck said, what the hell is happening here?
	Why is everybody standing up for me?
	Why is everybody highlighting the fact I can't stand up?
	Brought to you by Joe Bike.
	Let me take time out here from the content portion of the program to address a customer complaint.
	We try to take these on uh head on, and sometimes they get so voluminous we cannot answer them all email.
	Many of you are writing uh with uh mild-mannered and sometimes strongly worded complaints about the lack of sync between voice and video on our new HD Ditto Cam feed.
	There are abundantly clear technological reasons for this.
	We are in the midst of a fix.
	Now, what we're going to have to do, we're gonna have to set up three external mixers to go along with the one built-in internal mixer.
	And what'll happen is the audio of this program will be directly fed from the console, A console, uh, in Florida up to the B console in New York, where we will set up a mix minus that does not include the talk back.
	And then what's gonna happen, my audio will be mixed with the the B mix minus feed from New York, and we're gonna run the combination of those two things to the HD Ditto Cam.
	What'll happen then is that the audio from me will feed to the camera the video with no delay.
	Now, there is going to be a price to pay for this.
	I mean, not a financial price, but this will mean that the commercials and the sound bites will be delayed by just the same split second that you see the delay now between what I say and when you see me say it on the ditto camp.
	But I don't think you're gonna notice that because nobody will be actually speaking uh the uh the recorded commercials, the spots, or the or the sound bites.
	Um, because it's just your lips or my lips that you are are looking at.
	Now we're gonna have this done uh by tomorrow's show.
	So I'm dead certain this is gonna work.
	We've been looking at every option we can.
	And this is the this is the it's the fastest, it's the most efficient, and it's frankly it's the option that makes the most sense.
	Why don't I go through the people aren't gonna understand anyway, Snurley?
	Why should I go through it again?
	I just wanted to explain to them what we're gonna have to do here to make okay, we're gonna have to set up another mixer.
	We got mixer A, mixer B, we gotta go mixer C here in the studio gonna feed my audio directly from from the console in Florida to the console, the B console in New York.
	And we're gonna set up a mix minus at that point that does not include the talk back.
	Which is key.
	If you put if you leave the talk back in the circuitry, then everything goes out the window.
	If you leave the talk back in, nothing that none of this will work.
	So we we we can't we have to exclude the talk back.
	After we've done all that, we're going to mix me, my audio, and the mix-minus New York feed from console B coming from mixer C. And we're going to run that completed circuit to the HD Ditto Cam.
	And there that there will then thus be no delay or no lack of sync, as it appears between my lips, what I say, and the way people see it on the HD Ditto Cam.
	So believe me, this is we've looked at a number of different ways, including ripping it all out and starting all over.
	We looked at suing the manufacturer.
	Everything we thought of calling a Democrat tort lawyer, but we figured, why go to all that problem?
	So that that's the fix, and we hope to have that in uh by tomorrow.
	See, we deal with customer service complaints here out in the open up front, and we give you the explanation of how we're going to deal with it.
	You won't find that anywhere else.
	All right, here's uh here's Bob, Newport Beach, California.
	Welcome to the EIB network, sir.
	Hello.
	Hello, Russ.
	It's a pleasure to speak with you finally.
	Thank you, sir.
	They uh uh regarding this uh comment by Obama some time ago, where uh he states that uh families making uh less than 250,000 have not they're not going to suffer not one penny of tax increase.
	That statement uh does allow people to take refuge in that statement.
	However, that statement is very muddy, and I have to really believe that that's an intentional mudiness.
	And uh because the word make or makes or making doesn't exist in tax code as a legal definition.
	So if you think about your 1040, the first stage is uh income and uh top portion is in gross incomes, then there's adjustments to the income, then you have something called an HGI, I think that's on line twenty-two.
	The second page is uh a carryover of your AGI, and then they apply itemized deductions to that to reduce your AGI to come to something that's called taxable income.
	Well, there's no limitations to how that they can apply any new taxes.
	So people making 250,000 or less, attaches could be formed, they can assess it against gross, they can assess it against AGI, they can assess it against taxable.
	There's no limitations.
	So uh I'm highly suspicious about even Obama's state.
	Well, you know what?
	Uh your your your uh assessment here is a little bit more complicated than what we have to do to uh synchronize my voice with the video output on the HD DittoCam.
	Well, what it boils down to is he's gonna raise taxes on everybody.
	And we render when he runs around and says, if you make 250 days, people are thinking gross there.
	You're yeah, people are thinking gross, but it could be no, people are taking uh uh taxable income.
	The mistake is that he could uh uh uh assess it without wording, he could assess it to HEI.
	Yeah.
	There's a huge difference between AGI and taxable, sometimes as much as 50%.
	But the bottom line is the bottom line is he's now agnostic about it.
	Bottom line is he's now, oh, I don't know.
	Uh after promising this wouldn't happen, he's now said, well, I don't know.
	I've gone agnostic.
	I don't know.
	I know I'm open to ideas.
	Uh I don't really have an opinion on this.
	Uh I gotta wait and see what my advisors say.
	He's doing everything he can to avoid a flip-flop on this when in fact everybody's gonna figure out that this is already a flip-flop.
	He made too big a deal about this.
	In fact, in his first joint speech before Congress February last year, he made a huge deal out of it.
	And he says received a lot of sustained applause from uh from Democrats in the uh in the chamber uh about about all of this.
	So this is in fact Michael Barone wrote a piece that ran yesterday and a Washington examiner and got some really, really good points in it.
	I'll explain it to you when we come back from the break, but it's with absolute power, team Obama, Obama grows stupid.
	And here's how it starts.
	How could such smart people do so many stupid things?
	That question is being asked in Washington and around the country about the Obama administration.
	And the question remains is it stupid?
	Are they being stupid, or is this all by design?
	But nevertheless, interesting points Baron makes.
	I'll share them with you when we come back.
	Let's grab a couple of phone calls here before we get to the Michael Barone piece because uh most people have been on the full since the program began, a lot of patience, and I know they got other things to do, like listen to the program when they're not on hold.
	So we go to Muskegon, Michigan.
	Bruce, thank you, sir, for your patience and hello.
	Thank you, Russ, for taking my call.
	Last night I was listening to the news, and then I heard that the Social Security is now insolvent, which is about seven or eight years sooner than what they'd previously been predicting, I guess, based on, of course, of our economic situation.
	You know, we all know the way the government's running Social Security is bigger than any Ponzi scheme that Madoff could have ever dreamed of.
	And my question to you is what how do we get the Congress to produce legislation that will, you know, as painful as it might be, that will put uh Social Security back on the road to being solvent.
	Well, you remember that George W. Bush tried it.
	George Bush, immediately after his re-election in 2004, said he was going to use some of his political capital to reform Social Security.
	And he used the word privatize.
	And it was a good plan.
	It was an excellent, excellent plan, and it would not have touched current retirees.
	It would not have affected them at all.
	But the Democrats demagogued it, basically what Bush, I don't remember the specifics, but a portion, not all, a portion, of the payroll taxes deducted each pay period from an employees' paycheck, would be put into a uh an investment fund where it would grow independently of whatever the Social Security lock boxes.
	See, dirty little secret here is that the federal government has been living off Social Security for years.
	Social Security was taking in more than it was paying out, and they used that uh to make it look like the deficit was lower than it was.
	This has been going on for decades, uh, not just recently.
	Now you're right, we've reached the point where Social Security is st is is is spending, paying out more than it's uh bringing in.
	The only way that this is going to be reformed is to do a number of things.
	Raise the retirement age, and you have by the way, you have to it in order to get this done, you're gonna have to exempt from the reform changes any of the current retirees.
	If you don't, they'll stop it.
	They will they will stop it dead in its tracks.
	Social security, you've heard it referred to as the as the third rail.
	You mean you touch that and you're dead.
	Uh and and it is.
	It still is.
	And the Democrats don't want any reform whatsoever.
	And Obama clearly doesn't.
	He loves deficit spending, he loves debt.
	He loves wrecking the engine that produced the golden goose.
	He loves killing the golden goose.
	But this is going to have to be reformed, and everybody's been warning of this for 20 years, and we've had these stopgap little bipartisan fixes, and all they've done is buy a little time toward the day of reckoning.
	And at each one of these fixes, the people that were engaged in the fix or involved in it are no longer around.
	Uh elected officials, I mean, they're no longer around.
	But it's going to have to be privatized.
	What did Bush in was that term.
	The Democrats are able to demagogue it and point to a falling stock market and say, Do you want your Social Security money in that account?
	Look what's happening.
	Stock market.
	Do you want big-time Wall Street people making a profit on your Social Security contribution?
	They demagogued it all the way from here to hell.
	Just because the word privatization, and the reason they were successful in that is the word security.
	Social security.
	Secure.
	You don't have to worry about it.
	It's always going to be there.
	Then privatization came along.
	Democrats were that permitted Democrats to suggest that it wasn't going to be secure anymore.
	And they demagogued Wall Street just as Obama's doing now.
	It's the same old plate.
	This is why, frankly, I get so damn frustrated, folks, people not understanding who liberals are and what they believe and what they say and how they lie to people.
	the Democrats can't pay for any of their programs now.
	The people that have come along and tried to reform this get killed politically.
	They'd get destroyed.
	And yet the Democrats are taking this country off the cliff.
	Liberal Democrats taking the country off of the cliff.
	This young 15-year-old boy called us yesterday.
	What can I do to secure my future?
	Focus on grassroots, get rid of every Democrat.
	The only way this country is going to be restored to the country you think it is, and it always has been, is to get rid of Democrats in power.
	Get rid of them at the ballot box, get rid of them as a majority in any elected place, and it's going to take a while to depopulate the federal bureaucracy of all these career-appointed libs who are in there working against the expressed wishes of the elected representatives of the people if they're not oriented toward liberalism.
	It is a huge, huge fight.
	And the balance of the country, the future of the country, as you and I have known it is what hangs in the balance here.
	Ted in Bristol, Pennsylvania grad that you called, sir, and welcome to the EIB network.
	Thank you, Rosh.
	First time caller.
	Do you think Obama finally realized that he should soften his rhetoric on these big bonuses to uh anybody?
	Because that's where he intends to get his tax money from in the next couple of years.
	Plants down.
	No, no.
	He should put a minimum on the bonuses.
	No.
	So he can get more taxes.
	If he's softening his rhetoric on those guys, it's because they threaten to donate all their money to Republicans.
	Not Democrats.
	But I I look at I've got four stories here in the stack of how the White House is in a CYA lickety split trying to cover their bases on how Obama didn't mean that.
	Obama's got a consistent record of saying what he said.
	Uh Huffington Post, a number of other people, because Obama really stepped in it.
	I mean, you had Paul Krugman yesterday calling him a we're doomed.
	Obama, this is foolish.
	Because Obama's supporters want Wall Street people in jail.
	Obama's supporters want them frog marched out of their offices.
	Obama's supporters hate anything corporate.
	They hate anything profit.
	They hate bonuses.
	And Obama has said to them enough times that bonuses are obscene.
	He had the Pazar.
	He was going to make sure that these bonuses weren't paid that all of a sudden these two guys, Jamie Diamond and JP Morgan Chase, and Lloyd Blank Fine at Goldman Sachs, all of a sudden they're golden.
	They're golden.
	And Obama went out and talked about, I love the free market, and I'm not against people getting well rich and I'm acquiring, well, that's the way it works.
	And his left wing charges have gone bat manure.
	They just can't believe it.
	Now, one of the reasons MIT professor went batmanure yesterday, because he says, doesn't Obama realize that these are not free market banks?
	These are banks that were bailed out and saved by the government.
	They are wards of the state.
	These are banks too big to fail.
	Which makes these guys even madder because he doesn't think these guys who would have been out on their tushes if left alone should be paid big, big bonuses off of government money.
	Oh, the left is livid about this, and they're trying to cover Obama's dresses.
	Why they don't let him go out there with a teleprompter.
	But he I don't even know that he meant to say what he said.
	But if he did mean it, it was because he's scared that he believes these guys when they say that they are going to start contributing to Republicans now and no longer to Democrats.
	But uh I at this point, you know, analyzing why Obama does things is to get distracted.
	Uh I don't care why.
	I don't care what his motivation are, I don't care.
	It just has to be stopped.
	Whatever Obama's doing has got to be stopped.
	Right now, dead in its tracks.
	I'm not gonna let go of this Obiden comment last night, ladies and gentlemen on Larry King.
	Iraq could be one of the great achievements of this administration.
	Pure hypocrisy.
	And I wonder, too, if this is gonna be something that Gets Biden into trouble because Biden's out there saying, hey, hey, look at what we've done.
	We've had victory in Iraq, victory in Iraq.
	And that's not something the left wants to hear.
	By the way, at the White House press briefing, this idiot press secretary, Robert Gibbs, just said the administration doesn't believe Iran is a nuclear state.
	Gibb said we don't believe that Iran has the capabilities to enrich uranium to 20%.
	And yet, this is the same administration that didn't even know that Iran had a second nuclear power plant in addition to the one they had admitted to.
	So this is all very reassuring.
	But back to Joe Biden and the true history of Biden and Obama and the Democrats on the war in Iraq, April 2007, sorry, 2007.
	Last night, like millions of my fellow Americans, I listened intently to the President of the United States lay out his new strategy for Iraq.
	We all hoped and prayed that the President would present us with a plan that would make things better.
	Instead, I fear that what the President has proposed is more likely to make things worse.
	Talking about the surge, which made things better, that now Biden credits and takes claim for as having been a great achievement of his administration.
	March 14, 2007.
	What happens after we surge these women and men?
	And by the way, he said President General Petraeus is what is one who believes he may be the only one who believes this is a good idea.
	Virtually no one else thinks it's a good idea.
	Barack Obak, Obama January 10th, 2007, surge will not surge will not work.
	I am not persuaded that 20,000 additional troops in Iraq is going to solve the sectarian violence there.
	In fact, I think it'll do the reverse.
	I think it takes pressure off the Iraqis to arrive at the sort of political accommodation that every observer believes is the ultimate solution to the problems we face there.
	There you go.
	Obama.
	Surge won't work.
	January 10th, 2007.
	Biden again, March 2007.
	This is a cycle of self-sustaining sectarian violence.
	That 20,000, 30,000, 50,000, 100,000 Americans will not be able to stop.
	Joe Biden claiming credit today last night for the surge as being a great achievement of the Obama administration.
	Obama again, January 2007, saying there is no military solution.
	We cannot impose a military solution on what has effectively become a civil war.
	And until we acknowledge that reality, uh, we can send 15,000 more troops, 20,000 more troops, 30,000 more troops.
	I don't know any uh expert on the region or any military officer that I've spoken to uh privately that believes that that is going to make a substantial difference on the situation on the ground.
	Hasn't this sound familiar?
	He hadn't talked to an economist who thinks a tax cut would work.
	He hasn't talked to an economist who thinks anything that would work would work.
	He hadn't talked to anybody, never talks to anybody who thinks that what will work will work.
	He talks to ignoramuses.
	He is an ignoramus.
	He talks to idiots.
	And Biden goes out there and claims credit for all of this as a great achievement of the Obama administration.
	Here is Obama last year after taking office.
	February 27, 2009, changing his tune.
	The situation in Iraq has improved.
	Violence has been reduced substantially from the horrific sectarian killing of 2006 and 2007.
	Al Qaeda in Iraq has been dealt a serious blow by our troops and Iraq's security forces.
	And through our partnership with Sunni Arabs.
	The capacity of Iraq's security forces has improved.
	And Iraq's leaders have taken steps towards political accommodation.
	No thanks to Barack Obama or Joe Biden.
	They opposed every step of what led to success.
	You want to hear the man who won the war in Iraq?
	We'll go back to January 10th, 2007.
	This is a strong commitment.
	Before to succeed, our commanders say the Iraqis will need our help.
	So America will change our strategy to help the Iraqis carry out their campaign to put down sectarian violence and bring security to the people of Baghdad.
	This will require increasing American force levels.
	So I've committed more than 20,000 additional American troops to Iraq.
	The vast majority of them, five brigades, will be deployed to Baghdad.
	That's white comedian Paul Shanklin as Barack Obama as Ray Charles.
	And what Joe say.
	Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke waiting to hear about how difficult his confirmation hearings are for a second term could be.
	Got some good news last week on an his identity theft case.
	A leader of the ring that victimized him and his wife was sentenced to more than 16 years in prison.
	Look, think about this, folks.
	The chairman of the Federal Reserve.
	The chairman of the Federal Reserve had his identity stolen.
	CFR couldn't help it.
	The Trilateral Commission couldn't stop it.
	The Bilderbergers couldn't stop it.
	The Roth Shields, the Socialist International couldn't stop.
	All of these big groups could not stop and protect Bernanke's identity from being heisted.
	California health officials accidentally disclosed social security numbers of nearly 50,000 of the state's most vulnerable residents.
	People's identity doesn't have to be stolen.
	People are giving it away in California, but you can be protected with life lock.
	Nobody's going to stop it together altogether, but I see articles like this.
	Why don't they people have life lock?
	Bernanke would not have had a problem.
	Life lock protects your information.
	Never sell your information like some other companies do.
	Call 1-800-440-4833.
	Save 10% off your life lock membership just by mentioning my name.
	And it's just, it's $10 a month.
	To avoid hassles like you can't believe.
	800-440-4833 for life lock.
	Yes, yes, yes, we're going to do the jobs bill analysis, because it isn't a jobs bill.
	I got the Michael Barone piece here.
	And your host being raked over the coals on global warming by various uh media so-called stars.
	All that, plus the Democrats trying to hurry legislation to prevent corporations from making political donations.
	This election cycle.
	So fast as three hours in media continues with a loaded third hour coming up right after our obscene profit make uh break here at the top of the hour.

▲