All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 8, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:47
February 8, 2010, Monday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And welcome back.
It's Rush Limbaugh, and even more polling data that's bad for the one.
The Marist poll is now reporting Obama under 50%, joining Rasmussen and Gallup.
And soon it's going to be everywhere.
CBS ABC NBC and New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal.
Forty.
Let's see, 47% disapprove of Obama's job performance.
44% approve.
47 disapprove, 44% approve, that is the mayor's poll.
Great to have you back, folks.
Kick off a full week here of broadcast excellence.
We could have taken President's Day off.
We could have.
I threatened to do it six months ago.
Oh.
So I could still take President's Day off.
Oh, wow.
I thought it was today.
I thought that's why the government was closed.
Oh, the government's close because of snow.
Oh, wow, we're lucky we.
Lucky us is it 20 22 inches of snow closes the government, but yet local and county governments still have to have people on the plows and making the roads passable, but it's just too much for our elected royalty, I guess, to show up.
Well, could.
So I can still take presidents and say, oh, I know I threatened to do this sometime.
Because I always get I always see, I always get surprised by when it is.
It always sneaks up and I never know.
And I show up here and half the country's off, and I think, well, I got shafted again.
Order of a quarter million work.
That's that's all.
I thought it was a quarter million government workers is all?
I know in just Washington, a quarter of a million is all?
Shazam!
Thank you.
Well, they're all off.
That's fine and dandy.
Now I want to go back to the guy who asked me about whether or not starting a business he should take a government grant.
His partner wants to take a government, thinks the government's handing out free money.
No, that's that's that's never true.
There's always a price to pay for it.
Here is a story from CNN Money.com.
And the headline is for L3C companies, profit isn't the point.
When organic dairy farmer Vaughn Chase received a letter informing him that processor H.P. Hood would no longer be taking his milk, he feared he'd be forced out of business.
Three years earlier, he had invested $25,000 in converting his 600-acre family farm to meet the U.S. Department of Agriculture's organic certification standards.
But now he couldn't find another organic processor willing to take the milk from his remote farm in Maine.
With the price of non-organic milk plummeting below production levels, returning to conventional farming wasn't an option either.
Vaughn was one of ten small farms in Maine let go by H. P. Hood, the processor last year.
Luckily, none had to quit.
With the support of local government agencies and a business consultant, Vaughn and the other farmers created a company to process and distribute their milk locally under their own brand, Maine's own organic milk company, Moo Milk.
That was suicide, says Vaughan 54, who owns about 60 milking cows.
I couldn't put my family through that.
I might as well quit.
But the most unusual aspect of the venture is its legal status.
Moo milk is a low-profit limited liability corporation, or L3C.
It's a controversial new type of business entity intended to make it easier for companies with a social mission to receive investments, including loans and grants from charitable foundations and from government.
Are you with me so far on this?
Since April 2008, five states and two Indian tribes have signed legislation enabling companies to incorporate as an L3C, which is generally defined as a taxable for-profit business, whose primary goal is to achieve a stated social mission.
Profit is a secondary goal.
So this is social engineering in the private sector.
We are going to now reward businesses that do not make a profit if someone approves of their social mission.
Meanwhile, 90% of independents and Republicans and 80% of people in general disapprove of the Liberal Democrat Congress and the Liberal Democrat Congress is no different than the wackos who come up with an idea like this.
This is designed to pervert capitalism.
It is to corrupt the private sector and to change the mission.
An L3C, generally defined as a taxable for-profit business whose primary goal is to achieve a stated social mission.
Profit is a secondary goal.
Now the mainstream media, I mean, I just read Time magazine's circulation down 34.9%.
Newsweek down forty-one point three.
And both magazines have undergone recent revampings to make them more relevant to today's consumer.
Now, mainstream media companies ought to love this.
Throw profit out the window?
They've never liked having to make profit in the first place.
I'm not talking about the owners.
I'm talking about the journalists.
They've always thought that profit somehow polluted the objectivity of what they did.
Well, here's your chance.
Simply go out there, borrow some money to grow the business back or whatever you want to do with it, and say you're a three LC.
And your mission is not profit.
You have a social mission.
And the social mission is to what?
Propagandize the American people in the name of the Obama administration.
Five other states are currently considering similar legislation, and L3C proponents, including the Council on Foundations, are courting potential sponsors on Capitol Hill for a federal bill in Vermont.
The first state to pass the legislation, more than 80 companies have been incorporated as L3Cs in the past 21 months.
Do you understand the ramifications of this?
And of course, Vermont, a very liberal state.
80 companies have become incorporated.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Profit's not accompanied.
No, no, we got a social mission here.
Robert Lang, one of the original architects of the L3C concept.
We're trying to create an LLC whose very DNA insists that it has to put its beneficial activities in front of making money.
Lang is a former cosmetics business owner in Granite Springs, New York.
He came up with the idea soon after he was asked to run his late stepfather's stepfather small family foundation.
He learned about program-related investments, PRIs, which are loans or investments private foundations can offer for charitable or educational projects, such as affordable housing or health clinics, even if they are run for pri uh for-profit entities.
Well, this is disturbing as all get out to me, because this is the corrupting of the private sector.
And to change its mission in total.
And I this is the left is just running hog wild unchecked over everything, everything they can get their hands on.
And as you've seen, after just one year, folks, they destroy.
They literally destroy what they set out in their mind to fix.
Which in truth is what they're setting out in their mind to change.
New errors in the international or any intergovernmental panel on climate change report, the IPCC.
This is from the UK Telegraph.
You will not read about any of this in the United States media.
The United Nations Panel on Climate Change facing fresh criticism as the Sunday Telegraph reveals new factual errors and poor sources of evidence in its influential report to government leaders.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report is supposed to be the world's most authoritative scientific account of the scale of global warming.
But the Telegraph has discovered a series of new flaws in the paper, including the publication of inaccurate data on the potential of wave power to produce electricity around the world, which was wrongly attributed to the website of a commercial wave energy company.
Wave power.
Have you even heard of it?
Well, I have because I study this.
Inaccurate data on the potential of wave power to produce electric that's when you go outside your house in wave to produce electricity around the world, which was wrongly attributed to the website of a commercial wave energy company.
Claims based on information in press releases and newsletters from activist groups.
New examples of statements based on student dissertations, two of which were unpublished.
In other words, the IPCC put in their report to governmental leaders around the world.
Climate change assertions, statements based on papers that students wrote.
Two of them which were unpublished.
These were not even doctoral candidate students.
These were not doctoral theses.
These were just your run of the mill, average long-haired maggot-infested adult smoking student.
And more claims, which were based on reports produced by environmental pressure groups, in other words, activist groups.
They are the latest in a series of damaging revelations about the IPC's most recent report published in 2007, which it won for their work, a Nobel Peace Prize.
On Friday, it had emerged that the IPCC's panel had wrongly reported that more than half of the Netherlands was below sea level because it had failed to check information supplied by a Dutch government agency.
And then, of course, the nation of India has pulled out of this.
Because what was reported about the Himalayan glaciers was all wrong.
And they're going to appoint their own glaciologist study team into hell with the United Nations.
It just gets worse and worse and worse.
Why has it taken three years, folks, for all of these errors to be noticed?
Three years.
This is 2007, when this bogus thing came out.
And once again, honestly, friends, we can't help but ask why is it that we have to turn to the British press to get these kind of stories?
Are there no investigative journalists left in this country?
Meanwhile, we will once again note that British newspapers are not going out of business like so many are here in the United States.
I wonder if there's any correlation.
And speaking of that, from the BBC, there has been an increase in the number of British people who are skeptical about climate change, according to a BBC news poll.
Twenty-five percent of those questioned did not think global warming was happening.
That's an increase of 10% since a similar poll conducted in November.
The percentage of respondents who said climate change was a reality had fallen from 83% in November to 75% now.
Now it's still way too high, but it's coming down.
What this is what happens when your press reports the truth.
And here's from CBS News.
Arctic degrading faster than first thought.
New climate change study finds rapid sea ice melt affecting everything from polar bears to microorganisms.
Arctic degrading faster than first thought.
They have to make this happen faster since the emails came out, see.
They're doubling down on the accelerator.
A massive international study.
Who would that be?
The UN has found global warming is degrading the Arctic more than previously.
It's just like the uh the Himalayan glaciers, the same, same studies, the same techniques used here.
The U.S. Pew Environmental Group said it's quantified for the first time the economic costs of the Arctic's warming.
Adds up to at least 2.4 trillion over the next 40 years.
Economist Eben Goldstein of Bard College in New York says the Arctic is warming at twice the rate of the West of the World.
An economist is saying this.
Just like the head of the IPCC is an economist.
The Pichari guy.
Anyway, I gotta take a break here, folks.
We're very, very long.
We'll be back.
Get to your phone calls right after this.
Yes, sir.
Back we are.
Rush Limbaugh, having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
On the fastest three hours in media.
And here's the PS de resistance.
Top this again from the UK Sunday Times, not the Sunday New York Times.
Top British scientists says UN panel is losing credibility.
The most important is a claim that global warming could cut rain-fed North African crop production up 50% by 2020, a remarkably short time for such a dramatic change.
The claim has been quoted in speeches by Regenda Pachari, the IPCC chairman, and by the UN Secretary General.
This weekend, Professor Chris Field, the new lead author of the IPCC's climate impacts team told the Sunday Times that he can find nothing in the report to support the claim.
I mean, this is a this by the way, this is a global warming guy.
This is a global warming believer.
So what's happening?
I I mentioned this around the time of those emails.
Real scientists had better join the group of people demanding these other guys be held accountable because they are perverting and destroying all.
The perception of every scientist out there.
Have you heard this story?
It's been going around.
I've seen this now three times in the last four days.
That Obama wants to dump Biden.
And at the next Supreme Court vacancy, he's going to nominate Biden for it so he can get Hillary on the ticket to run as his VP.
To try to put things back together in 2012.
It's all over the place out there.
Here it is in US News.com.
Democrat strategists say that if Obama's re-election prospects look shaky, he could dump plugs Biden from the 2012 national ticket and choose Hillary Clinton as his running mate.
Well, well, interesting.
We'll keep a sharp eye on that.
This is Bob in uh in Hollywood, California.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Yeah, hey, Rush.
How are you doing, buddy?
Very well.
Thank you, buddy.
This one is for Rookie.
For years, the left has disavowed everything you've ever said because you're a quote unquote entertainer.
Now you go on your satirical retard rant, and suddenly you don't qualify as a comedian.
I just love it.
You know, we've had three really sharp, brilliant callers today, and you are one of them.
That had even escaped me.
Well, I knew it we wouldn't have escaped you for long.
It would have canned you eventually, but I thought I'd have to just get in there.
Oh my gosh, that's an excellent retort.
That is superb.
You are almost as good at me as turning it around on him.
Well, I'll tell you what, Rush.
I was born to do what you're doing, and uh, I can't tell you what an inspiration you've been.
And on an unrelated topic, I've just had a book published that I'm actually sending you a copy of today based on my experiences in the trenches of the Los Angeles Public School District.
And I think it's something you're really going to enjoy.
What's the title of the tome?
The title is Crippled by Compassion.
Public Education's Model for a Whiny Underachieving America.
Well, I love the title, Crippled by Compassion.
Yeah.
Great title.
I'll keep a sharp eye out for it.
Yeah, it'll be that I'm saying it to the New York Address today, so look when you get it.
Well, I'll tell a people up there to keep a sharp eye on it.
Great.
Just like I'll be keeping a sharp eye on Biden going to Supreme Court and Hillary joining him.
Ticket.
All right, buddy.
And you say desperation.
All right, that's great.
Thanks, Bob.
That's Bob in Hollywood.
So all these years, I don't count what I say.
I'm an entertainer.
And now all of a sudden, I can't do satire because I'm not an entertainer, because I don't go to Caroline's Comedy Club.
Quote, whoopee Goldberg.
Uh Diane in Las Vegas.
Great to have you on the program.
Hello.
Hello, Rush.
Hi.
I'm calling about health care.
No matter what the Democrats say to the Republicans or anything that they try to put in there, it would only be a lie.
They would sneak things in that none of us want.
And I believe we should wait until all of them are voted out.
We get people in there who care about America and believe in the Constitution, and then we can listen to them about health care.
Absolutely right.
Absolutely right.
And the Republicans ought not get suckered by this and go anywhere near it.
Say no.
Say hell no.
Hell no.
And we love you in Las Vegas, Rush.
Thank you, Diane.
I have a lot of fun when I go out there too.
I love the place.
Despite what President says.
Exactly.
All right.
And he's coming here.
Yeah, I know.
On a nerve.
It's okay for him there to go his kids blow his kids' college vacation or uh yeah, college vacation.
Well, our man is gonna take care of him.
Uh yeah, Oscar Goodman.
You gotta love Oscar Goodman.
Oh, we do.
Good.
I do too.
Thank you, Ryan.
Thank you, Diane.
This is Diana Las Vegas.
By the way, there's a long story.
I'm gonna have to save the details for tomorrow.
But it's really shocking, too, that it shows up in the Washington Post.
A headline, and it's by uh uh a chick.
It's by Ann Gerhardt.
A year later, where did the hopes for Obama go?
It's a very long piece.
It's about how a few people have lost the magic of Obama in their lives, especially on college camp eye.
And the reality of that is that kids have now very little hope of finding jobs that's seeping in to their reality.
Uh you really don't need to read the story, folks.
I've just given you the impetus.
The bloom is off the rose.
There is no hope.
There is no hope.
Well, Nielsen says that uh the Super Bowl is the most watched television show ever.
Not just the most watched Super Bowl, the most watched television show ever.
I guess that includes the uh the funeral of uh Princess Diana.
Well, now wait a minute.
That was worldwide.
Uh, this is just domestic United States.
Long uh largest audience for a television show ever.
Which really got to disappoint MSNBC.
Okay, back to the phones.
Here's Larry in in Moore, Oklahoma.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hello.
I had a comment about the LP or L3PC.
It's a three L C. Uh it's a low profit social mission uh corporation.
There you go.
I I think the EIB network should probably apply for some kind of a grant because you have a social objective.
The idea is to get all the dysfunctional minds properly working.
Yeah, but the problem with us is that we are oriented toward obscene profits, not small profits.
Uh, we wouldn't qualify.
We do both.
We accomplish a social mission each and every day while making obscene profits.
Well, yeah, but compared to the confiscatory profits that the IRS makes, you guys are smokes.
Well, yeah, there's always always somebody that does more.
Yeah, exactly.
That's always somebody that has more, somebody earns more.
That's exactly uh exactly right on the money.
Let's go to the audio sound bites.
I want to get some of Sarah Palin's speech because with Tate, we're gonna delve here into some uh some history of Ronaldus Magnus in the process.
This is Saturday Night National Tennessee National Tea Party Convention.
Sarah Palin, the keynote address.
Here's one of a few bites that we have.
I caution against allowing this movement to be defined by any one leader or politician.
The Tea Party movement is not a top-down operation, it's a ground-up call to action that is forcing both parties to change the way that they're doing business, and that's beautiful.
This is about the people.
This is about the people, and it's bigger than any king or queen of a tea party, and it's a lot bigger than any charismatic guy with a teleprompter.
By the way, if you notice she's put the godlike echo in her speech, uh, just as Obama does.
Here's the next bite.
Remember our administration promised that it would be good stewards of taxpayer dollars.
Remember, remember Vice President Biden.
He was put in charge of a tough, unprecedented oversight effort.
That's how it was introduced.
You know why?
Because nobody messes with Joe.
Now this was all part of that hope and change and transparency.
And now a year later I gotta ask those supporters of all that.
How's that hopey changey stuff working out for you?
Yeah, she's happy.
She's happy.
It just drives them nuts.
Just drives them nuts.
And like all of us, she just could she turns it all right back on them.
Makes fun of them.
Not supposed to do that.
Not supposed to.
Their mission is too important.
Their mission is too sacred.
Can't make fun of them.
No way.
And here's the next.
Let's see.
Yeah, a couple more here.
We have a vision for the future of our country, too, and it is a vision anchored in time-tested truths.
That the government that governs least governs best.
And that the Constitution provides the best roadmap towards a more perfect union.
And that only limited government can expand prosperity and opportunity for all.
and that freedom is a God-given right.
And it is worth fighting for.
God bless you.
These are enduring truths.
And these enduring truths have been passed down from Washington to Lincoln to Reagan and now to you.
And this is the coming Reagan bites.
This is um uh she knows like Reagan that simplicity and optimism is really all that's needed for America to turn around.
Let us not get bogged down in the small squabbles.
Let us get caught up in the big ideas.
To do so would be a fitting tribute to Ronald Reagan.
He knew the best of our country is not all gathered in Washington, D.C. It is here in our communities where families live and children learn, and children with special needs are welcomed in this world and embraced.
The best of America can be found in places where patriots are brave enough and free enough to be able to stand up and speak up, and where small businesses grow our economy one job at a time.
And folks like Reagan, we know that America is still that shining city on a hill.
Tea Party Nation, we know that there is nothing wrong with America that together we can't fix as Americans.
Bad aloe rattle.
Now that takes us to Reagan.
Now, these are fascinating bites.
We're gonna go back to a debate between Ronaldus Magnus and George H.W. Bush, April 24th, 1980.
Four times in this century we have had across the board tax cuts, all of which have resulted in such an increase in prosperity that the government, even in the first year, got increased revenues, not less.
The idea of a 10% cut across the board, the income tax, administered over a three-year period to a total of 30%.
I believe will stimulate the economy, will create jobs, but it will not reduce federal incomes.
It will only reduce the increase in taxes.
History has proven in all those other tax cuts.
I believe that we'll stimulate the economy, more people will be working, and it will be contrary to the Carter policy now of fighting inflation by adding millions to the unemployment roles.
And here's George H. W. Bush, a Bush 41 replying.
The difference we have is it is my understanding the Kennedy tax cut implemented by Lyndon Johnson resulted in a 4.4 billion dollar deficit.
And inflation then was 1.8, not 18%.
Investor confidence was high, not low.
And it is my perception that that tax cut applied today in the same percentages, the same numbers would result in a inflation rate of about 30 to 32 percent.
If we risk with investor confidence where it is, a deficit that's gonna be up already, I think 37 billion.
30 billion on top of that, I'm afraid we can't break inflation, and we gotta do that and do it fast.
Of course, just the exact opposite happened.
This was what was amazing for those of you that weren't alive or weren't paying attention.
The amazing thing was that inflation came down while the economy Was growing as a result of huge across the board tax cuts.
All these economists were stunned.
Bush was not alone in projecting that inflation would go sky high.
It came down.
Particularly, it took to the second term for it to start.
But it did come down.
The exact opposite happened.
Here's the final bite of this.
Well, George, we've got to do that.
And of course, it goes without saying.
And I certainly believe in reducing the cost of government far more than the phony decrease that Mr. Carter has proposed.
Let me just say one other thing.
I've heard for a great many years that uh we can't possibly reduce taxes.
This is Washington's cry.
I agree.
We can't reduce taxes until we reduce government spending.
And I have to point out that government does not tax to get the money it needs.
Government always needs the money it gets.
Now, your son can be extravagant with his allowance, and you can lecture him day after day about saving money and not being extravagant, or you can solve the problem by cutting his allowance.
That's Ronald Reagan responding to George H. W. Bush.
That's April 24th, 1980.
Government does not tax to get the money it needs.
It always needs the money it gets, meaning whatever gut amount they get they're going to spend.
No matter what you do.
So this is um just another reminder of what needs to happen here.
We find ourselves Jimmy Carter, his second term is unfolding right before our very eyes, although much worse.
Carter was a bumbling idiot.
This guy knows exactly what he's doing.
For example, headline donations to universities, plunge.
The sour economy has eaten into charitable contributions to colleges, universities across the Golden Triangle.
This is North Carolina, stalling construction projects at some and cutting the amount of money available for scholarship.
That's just what Obama planned.
That's just what Obama planned.
He wants the government to be in charge of all charities.
I just saw that uh Jack Merthot has died.
Democrat Pennsylvania.
Jack Knife has been sick all weekend.
There's something as surgery without surgery went wrong.
Complications of some kind of surgery.
So Jack Merthith, dead, uh Democrat from Pennsylvania.
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke.
And he's waiting around to hear about how difficult his confirmation hearings for a second term could be.
He did get some good news last week on his identity theft case.
A leader of the do you believe that?
The chairman of the Federal Reserve had his identity stolen.
If it can happen to the chairman of Federal Reserve, if the trilateral commission and the council on foreign relations cannot protect, and the Bilderbergers, if they can't protect the identity of the Fed chairman, what makes you think your identity is going to be safe?
Good God almighty, folks.
The CFR, the Trilateral Commission of Bilderbergers, and a socialist international together couldn't save Bernanke's identity.
He became a victim of fast-growing financial crime when a thief stole his wife's purse from the back of her chair at a Capitol Hill Starbucks on August 7th of 2008.
Inside were her leather wallet, four credit cards, five dollars in cash, and her checkbook.
This, according to police and court records, prosecutors said the theft was the work of a nationwide identity theft ring that hates the CFR, has caused more than one and a half million dollars in losses to at least ten financial institutions.
Now, she only had five bucks, and they still took her purse, four credit cards, and it was over.
The chairman of the Federal Reserve lost his identity.
Well, no, he had it stolen.
Wouldn't it happen probably more than likely if he'd had life luck.
When it comes to protecting your identity, why would you go with anybody but life lock?
They are the trusted leader in identity theft protection.
They help protect your information and they don't sell it to anybody.
Some of these other companies trying to do what LifeLock does, sell your information.
It's risky.
Life lock doesn't.
Don't wait.
Call them 1800-440-4833.
And if you mention the promo code Russian save 10% off your life lock membership, that's 800-440-4833.
If you don't have the CFR looking out for you, or the trilateral commission, and it apparently it doesn't help, you need life luck.
Well, this is a comforting thing here, folks.
The Supreme Leader.
Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khameni said today that Iran is set to deliver a punch that'll stun world powers during this week's 31st anniversary of the Islamic Revolution.
The Iranian nation with its unity and God's grace will punch the arrogant Western powers on the 22nd of Bahman, which is February 11th, in a way that will leave them stunned, Khamenei said.
He's also Iran's commander-in-chief.
Top cleric marking the occasion when Iran's Air Force gave its support to revolutionary leader Ayatollah Ruala Khomeini, a key event which blah blah blah blah blah blah.
So big punch coming February 11th.
Big punch.
Stun us.
Gotta go to sound bites.
Turns out that uh last week was not the first time that Obama had mispronounced corpsman.
He did it back in 2009 in October.
He was in Jacksonville, Florida at the Jacksonville Naval Air Station.
This goes by in seven seconds, but you'll hear it.
Pilots and air crews around the world.
Navy corpsmen on the ground in Afghanistan.
What is it here?
Navy corpsmen, and they want to have fun with Sarah Palin for John Little Note on her hand.
Navy corpsmen?
This is four times now since last uh last October.
Uh either his staff is too afraid to correct him or they're all ignorant too.
It's gotta be one of those two.
Corpsman.
Is he gonna call him the press?
Corps.
I do.
Now, this is interesting.
This is uh Saturday, Sunday afternoon during the Super Bowl today of the pregame show, and the perky Katie Kurick interviewing Obama.
She says, Have you ruled out trying the confessed 9-11 mastermind in New York City?
I have not ruled it out, but I think it's important for us to take into account the practical logistical issues involved.
I mean, if you've got a city that is saying no, uh, and a police department that's saying no, and a mayor that's saying no, that makes it difficult.
But uh I I think that the most important thing for the public to understand is we're not handling any of these cases any different than the Bush administration handled them all through 9-11.
I'm I'm I'm keeping my mouth closed here, folks.
This is this is bordering on profanity time, so I'm just uh the Bush administration wanted military tribunals.
It was only because the Bush administration was forced by some courts who took over the commander-in-chief duties, but that's not even the point.
That that's that that's not even the point.
I thought Bush was a war criminal.
I thought Bush's policies made us hated and less safe.
I thought Bush's policies added up to recruitment for Al-Qaeda.
And yet, our president, our young man child president, now says he's no different than the Bush administration.
First off, it's a lie, but but way the left gets a hold of this.
Then he's no different than Bush.
They want Bush frog marched into a jail.
Which, I mean, well, never mind.
I'm tempted to agree with him here if Obama goes too, but I don't want to go that far.
No, no.
Uh ladies and gentlemen, this man is.
You know that here's the best way to explain Obama to you.
When he says that he's now gonna focus on jobs many times last week, and then on Sunday, holds out this proposal for Republicans to come and talk to him at the White House on health care.
You might not understand his definition of focus.
When he says he's gonna focus on jobs, it doesn't mean he's focusing on jobs.
It means he's going to mention it.
Focus simply means mention to Obama because he's obviously not focused.
We'll be back after this.
Try this headline, ladies and gentlemen.
This is uh a great way to close out the program.
But plus, we have, I just learned this.
George W. Bush has been in the White House teaching Obama to pronounce words.
Uh and we have uh we a renegade uh sample of that tomorrow.
But this headline from Seattleweekly.com.
Gay, mentally challenged, biracial male cheerleader claims discrimination.
You know, it'd be hard not to discriminate somebody like this.
Uh gay, mentally challenged, biracial male cheerleader.
One, two, three, four.
Four different things there.
Gay, mentally challenged, biracial male cheerleader.
Do you want the details?
I give them tomorrow if you do.
▲
Export Selection