All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 8, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:47
February 8, 2010, Monday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And welcome back.
It's Rush Limbaugh.
And even more polling data that's bad for the one.
The Marist poll is now reporting Obama under 50%, joining Rasmussen and Gallup.
And soon it's going to be everywhere.
CBS, ABC, NBC, and New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal.
40.
Let's see.
47% disapprove of Obama's job performance.
44% approve.
47 disapprove, 44 approve.
That is the Marist poll.
Great to have you back, folks.
Kick off a full week here of Broadcast Excellence.
We could have taken President's Day off.
We could have.
I threatened to do it six months ago.
Oh, so I could still take President's Day off?
Oh, wow.
I thought it was today.
I thought that's why the government was closed.
Oh, the government's closed because of snow.
Oh, wow.
We're lucky we.
Lucky us.
They said 22 inches of snow closes the government, but yet local and county governments still have to have people on the plows and making the roads passable, but it's just too much for our elected royalty, I guess, to show up.
Well, cool.
So I could still take President's Day.
Oh, I know I threatened to do this something because I always get, I always, see, I always get surprised by when it is.
It always sneaks up and I never know.
And I show up here and half the country's off and I think, well, I got shafted again.
Order of a quarter million workers.
That's all?
I thought it was a quarter million government workers is all?
I know in just Washington, a quarter of a million is all.
Shazam.
Well, they're all off.
That's fine and dandy.
Now, I want to go back to the guy who asked me about whether or not starting a business, he should take a government grant.
His partner wants to take a government grant, thinks the government's handing out free money.
No, that's never true.
There's always a price to pay for it.
Here is a story from CNNMoney.com.
And the headline is, for L3C companies, profit isn't the point.
When organic dairy farmer Vaughan Chase received a letter informing him that processor H.P. Hood would no longer be taking his milk, he feared he'd be forced out of business.
Three years earlier, he had invested $25,000 in converting his 600-acre family farm to meet the U.S. Department of Agriculture's organic certification standards.
But now he couldn't find another organic processor willing to take the milk from his remote farm in Maine.
With the price of non-organic milk plummeting below production levels, returning to conventional farming wasn't an option either.
Vaughan was one of 10 small farms in Maine let go by H.P. Hood, the processor, last year.
Luckily, none had to quit.
With the support of local government agencies and a business consultant, Vaughan and the other farmers created a company to process and distribute their milk locally under their own brand, Maine's own organic milk company, MooMilk.
That was suicide, says Vaughan, 54, who owns about 60 milking cows.
I couldn't put my family through that.
I might as well quit.
But the most unusual aspect of the venture is its legal status.
Moo Milk is a low-profit limited liability corporation, or L3C.
It's a controversial new type of business entity intended to make it easier for companies with a social mission to receive investments, including loans and grants from charitable foundations and from government.
Are you with me so far on this?
Since April 2008, five states and two Indian tribes have signed legislation enabling companies to incorporate as an L3C, which is generally defined as a taxable for-profit business whose primary goal is to achieve a stated social mission.
Profit is a secondary goal.
So this is social engineering in the private sector.
We are going to now reward businesses that do not make a profit if someone approves of their social mission.
Meanwhile, 90% of Independents and Republicans and 80% of people in general disapprove of the Liberal Democrat Congress.
And the Liberal Democrat Congress is no different than the wackos who come up with an idea like this.
This is designed to pervert capitalism.
It is to corrupt the private sector and to change the mission.
An L3C, generally defined as a taxable for-profit business whose primary goal is to achieve a stated social mission.
Profit is a secondary goal.
Now, the mainstream media, I mean, I just read Time magazine circulation down 34.9%.
Newsweek down 41.3%.
And both magazines have undergone recent revampings to make them more relevant to today's consumer.
Now, mainstream media companies ought to love this.
Throw profit out the window?
They've never liked having to make profit in the first place.
I'm not talking about the owners.
I'm talking about the journalists.
They've always thought that profit somehow polluted the objectivity of what they did.
Well, here's your chance.
Simply go out there, borrow some money to grow the business back or whatever you want to do with it, and say you're a 3LC.
And your mission is not profit.
You have a social mission.
And the social mission is to what?
Propagandize the American people in the name of the Obama administration.
Five other states are currently considering similar legislation, and L3C proponents, including the Council on Foundations, are courting potential sponsors on Capitol Hill for a federal bill.
In Vermont, the first state to pass the legislation, more than 80 companies have been incorporated as L3Cs in the past 21 months.
Do you understand the ramifications of this?
And of course, Vermont, a very liberal state, 80 companies have become incorporated.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, profit's not going to be, no, no, we got a social mission here.
Robert Lang, one of the original architects of the L3C concept, we're trying to create an LLC whose very DNA insists that it has to put its beneficial activities in front of making money.
Lang is a former cosmetics business owner in Granite Springs, New York.
He came up with the idea soon after he was asked to run his late stepfather Small Family Foundation.
He learned about program-related investments, PRIs, which are loans or investments private foundations can offer for charitable or educational projects such as affordable housing or health clinics, even if they are run for-profit entities.
Well, this is Disturbing is all get out to me because this is the corrupting of the private sector and to change its mission in total.
And this is the left is just running hog wild unchecked over everything, everything they can get their hands on.
And as you've seen, after just one year, folks, they destroy.
They literally destroy what they set out in their mind to fix.
Which in truth is what they're setting out in their mind to change.
New errors in the international or intergovernmental panel on climate change report, the IPCC.
This is from the UK Telegraph.
You will not read about any of this in the United States media.
The United Nations Panel on Climate Change facing fresh criticism as the Sunday Telegraph reveals new factual errors and poor sources of evidence in its influential report to government leaders.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report is supposed to be the world's most authoritative scientific account of the scale of global warming.
But the Telegraph has discovered a series of new flaws in the paper, including the publication of inaccurate data on the potential of wave power to produce electricity around the world, which was wrongly attributed to the website of a commercial wave energy company.
Wave power!
Have you even heard of it?
Well, I have because I study this.
Inaccurate data on the potential of wave power to produce that's that's when you go outside your house and wave to produce electricity around the world, which was wrongly attributed to the website of a commercial wave energy company.
Claims based on information in press releases and newsletters from activist groups.
New examples of statements based on student dissertations, two of which were unpublished.
In other words, the IPCC put in their report to governmental leaders around the world climate change assertions, statements based on papers that students wrote, two of them which were unpublished.
These were not even doctoral candidate students.
These were not doctoral theses.
These were just your run-of-the-mill average long-haired maggot-infested don't smoking student.
And more claims which were based on reports produced by environmental pressure groups.
In other words, activist groups.
They are the latest in a series of damaging revelations about the IPC's most recent report published in 2007, which it won for their work, a Nobel Peace Prize.
On Friday, it had emerged that the IPCC's panel had wrongly reported that more than half of the Netherlands was below sea level because it had failed to check information supplied by a Dutch government agency.
And then, of course, the nation of India has pulled out of this because what was reported about the Himalayan glaciers was all wrong.
And they're going to appoint their own glaciologist study team into hell with the United Nations.
It just gets worse and worse and worse.
Why has it taken three years, folks, for all of these errors to be noticed?
Three years.
This is 2007 when this bogus thing came out.
And once again, honestly, friends, we can't help but ask why is it that we have to turn to the British press to get these kind of stories?
Are there no investigative journalists left in this country?
Meanwhile, we will once again note that British newspapers are not going out of business like so many are here in the United States.
I wonder if there's any correlation.
And speaking of that, from the BBC, there has been an increase in the number of British people who are skeptical about climate change, according to a BBC News poll.
25% of those questioned did not think global warming was happening.
That's an increase of 10% since a similar poll conducted in November.
The percentage of respondents who said climate change was a reality had fallen from 83% in November to 75% now.
Now, it's still way too high, but it's coming down.
This is what happens when your press reports the truth.
And here's from CBS News.
Arctic degrading faster than first thought.
New climate change study finds rapid sea ice melt affecting everything from polar bears to microorganisms.
Arctic degrading faster than first thought.
They have to make this happen faster since the emails came out.
See, they're doubling down on the accelerator.
A massive international study.
Who would that be?
The UN has found global warming is degrading the Arctic more than previously, just like the Himalayan glaciers, the same studies, the same techniques used here.
The USP Environmental Group said it's quantified for the first time the economic costs of the Arctic's warming adds up to at least $2.4 trillion over the next 40 years.
Economist Eben Goldstein of Bard College in New York says the Arctic is warming at twice the rate of the West of the world.
An economist is saying this.
Just like the head of the IPCC is an economist.
The Petrari guy.
Anyway, I got to take a break here, folks.
We're very, very long.
We'll be back.
Get to your phone calls right after this.
Yes, sir, back we are.
Rush Limbaugh, having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have on the fastest three hours in media.
And here's the PS de Résistance.
Top this again from the UK Sunday Times, not the Sunday New York Times.
Top British scientists says UN panel is losing credibility.
The most important is a claim that global warming could cut rain-fed North African crop production up 50% by 2020, a remarkably short time for such a dramatic change.
The claim has been quoted in speeches by Rajenda Pachari, the IPCC chairman, and by the UN Secretary General.
This weekend, Professor Chris Field, the new lead author of the IPCC's climate impacts team, told the Sunday Times that he could find nothing in the report to support the claim.
I mean, this is a, by the way, this is a global warming guy.
This is a global warming believer.
So what's happening?
I mentioned this around the time of those emails.
Real scientists had better join the group of people demanding these other guys be held accountable because they are perverting and destroying all their perception of every scientist out there.
Have you heard this story?
It's been going around.
I've seen this now three times in the last four days.
That Obama wants to dump Biden.
And at the next Supreme Court vacancy, he's going to nominate Biden for it so he can get Hillary on the ticket to run as his VP to try to put things back together in 2012.
It's all over the place out there.
Here it is in USNews.com.
Democrat strategists say that if Obama's re-election prospects look shaky, he could dump Plugs Biden from the 2012 national ticket and choose Hillary Clinton as his running mate.
Well, well, well, interesting.
We'll keep a sharp eye on that.
This is Bob in Hollywood, California.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Yeah, hey, Rush.
How are you doing, buddy?
Very well.
Thank you, buddy.
This one is for Whoopi.
For years, the left has disavowed everything you've ever said because you're a quote-unquote entertainer.
Now, you go on your satirical retard rant, and suddenly you don't qualify as a comedian.
I just love it.
You know, we've had three really sharp, brilliant callers today, and you are one of them.
That had even escaped me.
Well, I knew it wouldn't have escaped you for long.
It would have canned you eventually, but I thought I'd have to just get in there.
Oh, my gosh, that's an excellent retort.
That is superb.
You are almost as good at me as turning it around on them.
Well, I'll tell you what, Rush, I was born to do what you're doing, and I can't tell you what an inspiration you've been.
And on an unrelated topic, I've just had a book published that I'm actually sending you a copy of today based on my experiences in the trenches of the Los Angeles Public School District.
And I think it's something you're really going to enjoy.
What's the title of the tome?
The title is Crippled by Compassion, Public Education's Model for a Whiny, Underachieving America.
Well, I love the title, Crippled by Compassion.
Yeah.
A great title.
I'll keep a sharp eye out for it.
Yeah, it'll be.
I'm saying it to the New York Address today.
So I'll keep when you get it.
Well, I'll tell the people up there to keep a sharp eye on it.
Great.
Just like I'm going to be keeping a sharp eye on Biden going to Supreme Court and Hillary joining him.
Ticket.
All right, buddy.
And you say desperation.
All right, that's great.
Thanks, Bob.
That's Bob in Hollywood.
So all these years, I don't count what I said.
I'm an entertainer.
And now all of a sudden, I can't do satire because I'm not an entertainer because I don't go to Carolina's Comedy Club.
Quote, Whoopi Goldberg.
Diane in Las Vegas.
Great to have you on the program.
Hello.
Hello, Rush.
Hi.
I'm calling about health care.
No matter what the Democrats say to the Republicans or anything that they try to put in there, it would only be a lie.
They would sneak things in that none of us want.
And I believe we should wait until all of them are voted out.
We get people in there who care about America and believe in the Constitution, and then we can listen to them about health care.
Absolutely right.
Absolutely right.
And the Republicans ought not get suckered by this and go anywhere near it.
Say no.
Say hell no.
Hell no.
And we love you in Las Vegas, Rush.
Thank you, Diane.
I have a lot of fun when I go out there, too.
I love the place, despite what President says.
Exactly.
All right.
And he's coming here.
Yeah, I know.
On a nerve.
It's okay for him there to go blow his kids' college vacation or college vacation.
Well, our mayor's going to take care of him.
Yeah, Oscar Goodman.
You've got to love Oscar Goodman.
Oh, we do.
Good.
I do, too.
Thank you, Rush.
Thank you, Diane.
This Diane of Las Vegas.
By the way, there's a long story.
I'm going to have to save the details for tomorrow.
But it's really shocking, too, that it shows up in the Washington Post.
A headline.
And it's a chick.
It's by Ann Gerhart.
A year later, where did the hopes for Obama go?
It's a very long piece.
It's about how a few people have lost the magic of Obama in their lives, especially on college campaign.
And the reality of that is that kids have now very little hope of finding jobs that's seeping in to their reality.
You really don't need to read the story, folks.
I've just given you the impetus.
The bloom is off the rose.
There is no hope.
There is no hope.
Well, Nielsen says that the Super Bowl is the most watched television show ever.
Not just the most watched Super Bowl, the most watched television show ever.
I guess that includes the funeral of Princess Diana.
Well, now, wait a minute.
That was worldwide.
This is just domestic United States.
Largest audience for a television show ever.
Which really got to disappoint MSNBC.
Okay, back to the phones.
Here's Larry in Moore, Oklahoma.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hello.
I had a comment about the LP or L3PC.
This is a 3LC.
It's a low-profit social mission corporation.
There you go.
I think the EIB network should probably apply for some kind of a grant because you have a social objective.
The idea is to get all the dysfunctional minds properly working.
Yeah, but the problem with us is that we are oriented toward obscene profits, not small profits.
We wouldn't qualify.
We do both.
We accomplish a social mission each and every day while making obscene profits.
Well, yeah, but compared to the confiscatory profits that the IRS makes, you guys are smokes.
Well, yeah, there's always somebody that does more.
Yeah, exactly.
There's always somebody that has more, somebody earns more.
That's exactly right on the money.
Let's go to the audio sound bites.
I want to get some of Sarah Palin's speech because with Tate, we're going to delve here into some history of Rinaldus Magnus in the process.
This is Saturday night, Nashville, Tennessee, National Tea Party Convention.
Sarah Palin, the keynote address.
Here's one of a few bites that we have.
I caution against allowing this movement to be defined by any one leader or politician.
The Tea Party movement is not a top-down operation.
It's a ground-up call to action that is forcing both parties to change the way that they're doing business.
And that's beautiful.
This is about the people.
This is about the people.
And it's bigger than any king or queen of a Tea Party.
And it's a lot bigger than any charismatic guy with a teleprompter.
By the way.
Have you noticed she's put the godlike echo in her speech, just as Obama does.
Here's the next bite.
Remember, our administration promised that it would be good stewards of taxpayer dollars.
Remember?
Remember Vice President Biden?
He was put in charge of a tough, unprecedented oversight effort.
That's how it was introduced.
You know why?
Because nobody messes with Joe.
Now, this was all part of that hope and change and transparency.
And now a year later, I got to ask those supporters of all that, how's that hopey-changey stuff working out for you?
Yeah, she's happy.
She's happy.
It just drives them nuts.
Just drives them nuts.
And like all of us, she turns it all right back on them.
Makes fun of them.
Not supposed to do that.
Not supposed to.
Their mission is too important.
Their mission is too sacred.
You can't make fun of them.
No way.
And here's the next.
Let's see.
Yeah, a couple more here.
We have a vision for the future of our country, too, and it is a vision anchored in time-tested truths.
That the government that governs least governs best.
And that the Constitution provides the best roadmap towards a more perfect union.
And that only limited government can expand prosperity and opportunity for all.
And that freedom is a God-given right, and it is worth fighting for.
These are enduring truths, and these enduring truths have been passed down from Washington to Lincoln to Reagan and now to you.
And this will get us into the coming Reagan bites.
This is, she knows like Reagan, that simplicity and optimism is really all that's needed for America to turn around.
Let us not get bogged down in the small squabbles.
Let us get caught up in the big ideas.
To do so would be a fitting tribute to Ronald Reagan.
He knew the best of our country is not all gathered in Washington, D.C.
It is here in our communities where families live and children learn and children with special needs are welcomed in this world and embraced.
The best of America can be found in places where patriots are brave enough and free enough to be able to stand up and speak up and where small businesses grow our economy one job at a time.
And folks like Reagan, we know that America is still that shining city on a hill.
Tea Party Nation, we know that there is nothing wrong with America that together we can't fix as Americans.
Radon, radon, radon.
Now that takes us to Reagan.
Now these are fascinating bites.
We're going to go back to a debate between Ronaldus Magnus and George H.W. Bush, April 24th, 1980.
Four times in this century, we have had across-the-board tax cuts, all of which have resulted in such an increase in prosperity that the government, even in the first year, got increased revenues, not less.
The idea of a 10% cut across the board, the income tax, administered over a three-year period to a total of 30%, I believe will stimulate the economy, will create jobs, but it will not reduce federal incomes.
It will only reduce the increase in taxes.
History has proven in all those other tax cuts.
I believe that will stimulate the economy.
More people will be working.
And it will be contrary to the Carter policy now of fighting inflation by adding millions to the unemployment rolls.
And here's George H.W. Bush, a Bush 41, replying.
The difference we have is that it is my understanding the Kennedy tax cut implemented by Lyndon Johnson resulted in a $4.4 billion deficit.
And inflation then was 1.8, not 18%.
Investor confidence was high, not low.
And it is my perception that that tax cut applied today in the same percentages, the same numbers, would result in a inflation rate of about 30 to 32 percent.
If we risk, with investor confidence where it is, a deficit that's going to be up already, I think 37 billion, 30 billion on top of that, I'm afraid we can't break inflation.
And we've got to do that and do it fast.
Of course, just the exact opposite happened.
What was amazing, for those of you that weren't alive or weren't paying attention, the amazing thing was that inflation came down while the economy was growing as a result of huge across-the-board tax cuts.
All these economists were stunned.
Bush was not alone in projecting that inflation would go sky high.
It came down.
Particularly, it took to the second term for it to start.
But it did come down.
The exact opposite happened.
Here's the final bite of this.
Well, George, we've got to do that.
And of course, it goes without saying.
And I certainly believe in reducing the cost of government far more than the phony decrease that Mr. Carter has proposed.
Let me just say one other thing.
I've heard for a great many years that we can't possibly reduce taxes.
This is Washington's cry.
I agree.
We can't reduce taxes until we reduce government spending.
And I have to point out that government does not tax to get the money it needs.
Government always needs the money it gets.
Now, your son can be extravagant with his allowance, and you can lecture him day after day about saving money and not being extravagant, or you can solve the problem by cutting his allowance.
That's Ronald Reagan responding to George H.W. Bush.
That's April 24th, 1980.
Government does not tax to get the money it needs.
It always needs the money it gets, meaning whatever amount they get, they're going to spend, no matter what you do.
So, this is just another reminder of what needs to happen here.
We find ourselves Jimmy Carter, his second term, is unfolding right before our very eyes, although much worse.
Carter was a bumbling idiot.
This guy knows exactly what he's doing.
For example, headline, donations to universities, plunge.
The sour economy has eaten into charitable contributions to colleges, universities across the Golden Triangle.
This is North Carolina, stalling construction projects at some and cutting the amount of money available for scholarship.
That's just what Obama planned.
That's just what Obama planned.
He wants the government to be in charge of all charities.
I just saw that Jack Murphy has died, Democrat Pennsylvania.
Jack, he's been sick all weekend.
There's something a surgery we went, surgery went wrong.
Complications of some kind of surgery.
So, Jack Merthutt, dead, Democrat from Pennsylvania.
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, and he's waiting around to hear about how difficult his confirmation hearings for a second term could be.
He did get some good news last week on his identity theft case.
A leader of the, do you believe that?
The chairman of the Federal Reserve had his identity stolen.
If it can happen to the chairman of Federal Reserve, if the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations cannot protect and the Bilderbergers, if they can't protect the identity of the Fed chairman, what makes you think your identity is going to be safe?
Good God Almighty, folks.
The CFR, the Trilateral Commission of Bilderbergers, and a Socialist International together couldn't save Bernanke's identity.
He became a victim of fast-growing financial crime when a thief stole his wife's purse from the back of her chair at a Capitol Hill Starbucks on August 7th of 2008.
Inside were her leather wallet, four credit cards, $5 in cash, and her checkbook.
This, according to police and court records, prosecutors said the theft was the work of a nationwide identity theft ring that hates the CFR, has caused more than $1.5 million in losses to at least 10 financial institutions.
Now, she only had five bucks, and they still took her purse, four credit cards, and it was over.
The chairman of the Federal Reserve lost his identity.
Well, no, he had it stolen.
Wouldn't have happened probably, more than likely, if he'd had Life Luck.
When it comes to protecting your identity, why would you go with anybody but Life Lock?
They are the trusted leader in identity theft protection.
They help protect your information and they don't sell it to anybody.
Some of these other companies trying to do what LifeLock does sell your information.
It's risky.
LifeLock doesn't.
Don't wait.
Call them 1-800-440-4833.
And if you mention the promo code Rush will save 10% off your Life Lock membership, that's 800-440-4833.
If you don't have the CFR looking out for you or the Trilateral Commission, and it apparently doesn't help, you need Life Luck.
Well, this is a comforting thing here, folks.
Supreme leader, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khomeini, said today that Iran is set to deliver a punch that'll stun world powers during this week's 31st anniversary of the Islamic Revolution.
The Iranian nation, with its unity and God's grace, will punch the arrogant Western powers on the 22nd of Baman, which is February 11th, in a way that will leave them stunned, Khomeini said.
He's also Iran's commander-in-chief, top cleric, marking the occasion when Iran's Air Force gave its support to revolutionary leader Ayatollah Ruwala Khomeini, a key event which blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
So big punch coming February 11th.
Big punch.
Stun us.
Got to go to soundbites.
Turns out that last week was not the first time that Obama had mispronounced corpsman.
He did it back in 2009 in October.
He was in Jacksonville, Florida at the Jacksonville Naval Air Station.
This goes by in seven seconds, but you'll hear it.
Pilots and air crews around the world.
Navy corpsmen on the ground in Afghanistan.
What is it here?
Navy corpsemen.
And they want to have fun with Sarah Palin for a little note on her hand.
Navy corpsemen?
This is four times now since last October.
Either his staff is too afraid to correct him or they're all ignorant too.
It's got to be one of those two.
Corpsman?
Is he going to call him the press corpse?
I do.
Now, this is interesting.
This is Saturday, Sunday afternoon during the Super Bowl today, the pregame show, and the perky Katie Couric interviewing Obama.
She says, have you ruled out trying the confessed 9-11 mastermind in New York City?
I have not ruled it out, but I think it's important for us to take into account the practical, logistical issues involved.
I mean, if you've got a city that is saying no, and a police department that's saying no, and a mayor that's saying no, that makes it difficult.
But I think that the most important thing for the public to understand is we're not handling any of these cases any different than the Bush administration handled them all through 9-11.
I'm keeping my mouth closed here, folks.
This is bordering on profanity time.
The Bush administration wanted military tribunals.
It was only because the Bush administration was forced by some courts who took over the commander-in-chief duties.
But that's not even the point.
That's not even the point.
I thought Bush was a war criminal.
I thought Bush's policies made us hated and less safe.
I thought Bush's policies added up to recruitment for al-Qaeda.
And yet, our president, our young man-child president, now says he's no different than the Bush administration.
First off, it's a lie, but way the left gets a hold of this, that he's no different than Bush.
They want Bush frog-marched into a jail.
Which, I mean, well, never mind.
I was tempted to agree with him here if Obama goes too, but I don't want to go that far.
No, no.
Ladies and gentlemen, this man is, you know, here's the best way to explain Obama to you.
When he says that he's now going to focus on jobs many times last week and then on Sunday holds out this proposal for Republicans to come and talk to him at the White House on health care, you might not understand his definition of focus.
When he says he's going to focus on jobs, it doesn't mean he's focusing on jobs.
It means he's going to mention it.
Focus simply means mention to Obama because he's obviously not focused.
We'll be back after this.
Try this headline, ladies and gentlemen.
This is a great way to close out the program.
But plus, we have, I just learned this.
George W. Bush has been in the White House teaching Obama to pronounce words.
And we have a renegade sample of that tomorrow.
But this headline from Seattleweekly.com.
Gay, mentally challenged, biracial male cheerleader claims discrimination.
You know, it'd be hard not to discriminate somebody like this.
Gay, mentally challenged, biracial male cheerleader.
One, two, three, four.
Four different things there.
Gay, mentally challenged, biracial male cheerleader.
Clint.
Do you want the details?
I'll give them tomorrow if you do.
▲
Export Selection