All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 3, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:40
February 3, 2010, Wednesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
I am noted bomb thrower Rush Limbaugh.
Threw a bomb this morning on Fox and Friends, and I will throw a couple more bombs tomorrow morning in the second part of my interview with Gretchen Carlson.
So thrilled and delighted to have you with us today.
Telephone number if you want to join us, 800-282-2882, the email address L Rushbow at EIBNet.com.
We had this before it hit the wires.
An attorney for Scott Brown says in a letter today to the Governor of Massachusetts, Dabal Patrick, that Brown has been told there may be votes in which he wants to participate.
The attorney says Brown wants the results of the January 19th election certified by 11 o'clock tomorrow morning.
So they can be forward to Senate officials for immediate action.
The demand reverses Brown's prior statements on the issue.
He's been saying he was content to wait until February 11th for his swearing in so he could hire his staff and be prepared to assume his duties.
But something's percolating in there.
He says there's a lot of votes that can happen in a week in the Senate, and Paul Kirk is still in there voting.
When he really shouldn't be.
So the game's on.
Number of votes are scheduled in the Senate this week.
And the Senate is playing hands off.
They're like, I'm we have nothing to do with this, but they are behind this.
Team Democrat is behind this.
Brown wants these results certified by 11 o'clock tomorrow morning so they can be forward to Senate officials.
The Democrats are not going to get away with this.
They only get away with this stuff when no one shines the spotlight on it.
And EIB has proved time and time again the spotlight will be shined.
And once people pick up on this, it ain't gonna be pretty.
Obama's Democrats in the Senate blocking the due winner of the Ted Kennedy election.
It took place on January 19th in the Senate.
Now Obama went up to the uh Senate today, had a big meeting.
And he told them, you gotta keep going, man.
You gotta keep fighting.
You gotta keep pulling for health care.
You gotta keep doing it.
We gotta go.
And they started applauding.
I don't I don't think anybody showed him the latest poll before he went up there and talked to these guys today.
It's my Andy Barr in the politico, and basically says here the health bill will not help the Democrats.
Democrats will face nearly the same political environment this fall, whether or not they pass health care reform, according to a new poll that was out yesterday.
So much for the advice from Bill Clinton and the forehead and the rest of these Democrat consultants who are all lying to these guys.
Clinton was out there saying, you know why I didn't get you know, you know why I lost the House in 1994.
You know why that happens because I I didn't get health care passed.
If I'd have passed health care, that'd never happen.
Of course, that was a full-fledged lie.
It if it wasn't a lie, he was just dead wrong.
National Survey, 500 84 registered voters conducted by public policy polling, which is a Democrat group out of North Carolina, shows that Republicans currently have a generic ballot advantage of 43 to 40 in races for Congress.
When voters were asked which party they were more likely to support if a health care bill doesn't pass.
Forty-three percent still said they'd vote for a Republican candidate, while the number who would vote for a Democrat fell to 38%.
If Democrats were able to send Obama health care reforms, 45% of those surveys said they would support a Republican, and 40% would uh back a Democrat.
So it looks like the political damage for Democrats on health care has been done, whether they end up passing the bill or not, said Dean Debnam, the PPP president.
Republican support for this fall is identical with or without it.
You Democrats better take note of this because you it does it it's the greatest harm to you is passing this thing, but you're in bad shape regardless.
No two ways about it.
I have a series of sound bites here that I you you're going to love listening to.
This is yesterday morning in Washington on Capitol Hill, the Senate budget committee, Senator Judd Gregg, a Republican from New Hampshire, was talking with the budget director, Peter Orzog.
How many uh how many children out of wedlock does this guy have now?
He's got at least one.
He was engaged to somebody, and she was pregnant and he broke up and has gotten with somebody else now.
Um revenge of the nerds, so to speak.
Anyway, here's here's the first bite from Jeb uh Judd Gregg.
The whole concept of the TARP was that as we recoup the money, it would because we were borrowing it from Americans and from the Chinese, it is we recoup that money, we would use it to pay down the debt.
Now that's not going to happen.
It's become a piggy bank.
Which adds to our deficit, adds to our debt.
Peter Orzog then uh decides to say this.
The degree to which shifting funds uh would add to our debt or deficits depends on what the net subsidy rate would be on that new activity.
And remember, the purpose of TARP was to address problems in our financial markets.
And it has been remarkably successful in bringing credit spreads back down to normal levels.
One of the lingering problems in our financial markets, however, is access to credit for small businesses.
And they can the continue this this misconception of this misrepresentation.
Uh in the first place, the inspector general, Borofsky, says that TARP didn't do anything.
It has been ultimately a failure.
And this business about credit for small businesses.
They don't want to borrow any money.
They don't want to write, they don't want to expand, folks.
There's no recovery.
There's no reason.
So this is where Judd Gregg loses it on Orzog about what the TARP law says.
No, no, you can't make that type of statement with any legitimacy.
Okay.
You cannot make that statement.
This is the law are not suffering from it.
Let me tell you what the law says.
Let me read it to you again because you don't appear to understand the law.
The law is very clear.
The monies recouped from the TARP shall be paid into the general fund of the Treasury for the reduction of the public debt.
It's not for a piggy bank because you're concerned about lending to small business requirements.
You want to get a political event when you go out and make a speech in Nashua, New Hampshire.
That's not what this money's for.
This money is to reduce the debt of our children.
Now, what's being talked about here is the $30 billion that Obama says he's taking from money that the government that the banks are paying back to set up a government agency that will provide low interest loans to small businesses.
And what good Judd Gregg, that's not the law.
You can't use TARP money for that.
I'm reading the law to you.
And what Orzog's trying to say to you is um, but but Senator, this would require legisl.
No, it doesn't require legislation.
The law is the law.
He said small businesses are not suffering from the So Greg is really laying it to him here.
Judd Gregg has stepped up in the last couple of weeks to be a serious critic of these guys.
Uh here's the final exchange, and I think Bernie Sander gets involved here.
Let me ask you another question, because clearly we're not going to agree on this, and you're not going to follow the law.
Secondly, uh sorry, I do um excuse me.
We will be following the law.
This would involve legislation.
Well, then you're not going to be able to do it unless Congress gives you the authority to do it.
That is how laws are made usually.
Congress passes them.
Thank you, uh, Senator Sanders.
That is although it's a made Congress usually passes them.
So these clowns don't know what they're doing.
They don't care about the law anyway, ladies and gentlemen, no question about it.
For you EIB listeners, we've been discussing how your vehicle can last a lifetime with the right automotive maintenance, the maintenance is fluid maintenance using BG products.
And if you have a choice between simply getting another oil change or getting a BG oil service that cleans both the fuel and the oil system and offers a free lifetime protection plan, which would it be?
It's an easy one to answer.
It'd be the BG Oil Service.
I, El Roshwo, use BG Oil Service because it adds value, and yes, life to my cars.
BG products started in Wichita about 40 years ago by six decorated World War II veterans who had a dream of providing the very best fluid maintenance products available.
Now this is where it gets tough.
You just can't go out and buy it.
This is a tough thing, folks.
You got the best product for oil service maintenance and other engine fluid automobile fluid maintenance.
You got the best products in the world, and you can't just go to an auto parts store and buy the stuff.
Because the way they've set the business up.
You have to go to a website called BG FindtheShop.com.
And on that website, you'll be able to find the nearest dealership or service center that uses BG products.
Now I guarantee you we're gonna we shut down their website for a while every time this happens.
It'll be busy, but uh keep keep looking for it, keep trying to get in because this is worth it.
There is a lifetime BG protection plan once you start using their products.
It's uh it's uh I know a lot of you are not buying new cars for a host of reasons.
So you gotta make sure the one you're driving holds up.
Changing the oil and all the other engine fluids is key to that.
And the best product out there is BG products, so go to BG, find a shop.com, and just try it.
Find out where you can go the nearest place to start using and getting a BG oil service.
Judd Gregg has been going at these guys on the budget solidly for a year.
And this, folks, is exactly what we need to be doing.
Every Republican needs to be saying this latest Obama budget, for example, is DOA.
They need to set the tone for this.
And and Judd Gregg seems to have discovered what I have known for decades, and that is you gotta go hard at these liberals.
You don't play by their rules, which say independents don't like criticism.
Independents don't like it when the Republicans criticize the Democrats.
No, no, no.
You go after these guys hard, and the response you get will be huge.
All they gotta do is look at Scott Brown.
Do not hold back on these people.
All right, to the phones we go.
This is Gail, Barrington, Illinois.
Nice to have you on the Rush Limbaugh program.
Hi.
Hi, Rush.
Love you, listen to you for lots of years, but I was distressed by your comments on Rahm Emanuel's reference to retarded persons.
Mm-hmm.
And I was distressed because you took the view as though his comments were an insult to the liberal Democrats, which I'm sure Sarah Palin wouldn't have cared about anyway.
The reason they were so offensive is because by using the term retarded or retards as a term of appropriate or derision, it's insulting to all persons with mental disabilities.
Right.
Well, the point I was making was that Emmanuel compares Democrats to retarded people and then apologize to the retarded people, uh, which in in turn uh is not a complimentary thing to say about the Democrats either.
It's it's sort of like if if uh if I would compare Obama to a rat and somebody say, Don't do that, you're insulting rats.
This is the same thing.
A Ram Emanuel is comparing Democrats to retarded people.
People say, don't insult retarded people that way.
That's that's my take on it.
I think I think um I think he is i I think he and a lot of people in our society use those terms as a way to denigrate those people.
Um it is it is not polite.
It can be hurtful, and I think that in a lot of your comments, it sounded to me as though you were repeating that.
Well, I was.
I was trying to focus attention on once again a loose-lip Democrat.
These Democrats can get away, these guys get away with insulting people left and right, and they're never called on it.
And so if if Rahm Emanuel can say it, I'll just jump in to highlight the fact that another Democrat, this time the president's chief of staff, is out there talking this way.
Well, and I and I agree, I agree with you on that point.
I just felt as though your comments seemed to me to underline the idea that uh the insult was to the Democrats, and it's not.
The insult is to the people with disabilities.
No, no, no, no.
I know the insult is to retarded people, but I am not.
I am not.
Those are not my words.
Those are not my words.
And by the way, I gotta tell you something.
When I grew up, this is to show you how society changed.
Retarded is what they were called even by the schools.
When I grew up, that's that's what they were called.
It's only recently that that's become a pejorative.
Well, you know, and I don't have a problem if someone is discussing an actual person with mental retardation, inappropriate I mean, I have a son with developmental disability.
And if I were discussing it with um, you know, someone at the schools or I was discussing him, and we are discussing him in a clinical way and saying that he had mental retardation.
It's not the current term, but to me that would not be an insult.
Yet if somebody referred to him as a retard.
Like Rahm Emanuel did.
Well, and the way Rahm Emanuel referred to him was in fact insulting.
But I thought that your comments that the insult was to the Democrats, not to the people who were denigrated.
Well, maybe I didn't express it right, but the the point is I just found it funny that while Ram Emanuel is he compared, the first thing he did was compared liberal activists to retarded people, and then apologized to the retarded people for doing that as though it's an insult to be called a Democrat.
Um as I told you, it's just like if I were to call Obama a rat.
No, no, no, don't insult rats that way.
So here's Emmanuel who has uh called Democrats retarded, and the retort is don't insult retarded people that way by calling them Democrats.
That was the point I was trying to make with the irony in all in uh in uh Ram Emanuel's comments.
But you what understand?
Look, this is not just Emmanuel.
It was Obama on the Tonight Show.
Who went out there compared himself special Olympics and he when he bowls, he looks like a special Olympian something.
I mean, these these uh the dirty little secret is as all these pejoratives and all these politically incorrect terms, Democrats use them all the time in private conversation, and they never get held to account for it.
This is uh Rahmanuel made this comment back in August.
Did you know that, Gail?
I did, because I was listening to you earlier and you referred to it.
Yeah.
Um no, I I agree with you about the double standard, and I agree with you that it was offensive, but it was not clear from your comments that the reason why it is so offensive is because it is used as a pejorative denigrating as an approprium against a whole class of the gotta cut me some slack.
I you got you've got it.
I've been here twenty plus years.
You've got to know that I don't that that I know that that's pejorative comment.
It's the reason I kept repeating it is to never let people forget that it was Rahm Emanuel who said it.
It's like Harry Reed in the Negro dialect.
I kept talking about that.
Yeah, he's light-skinned and he doesn't speak with a Negro dialect except when he wants to.
You know, I and and sure enough, the next day I caught grief, as though I had originated the comment.
That's the way the press works.
Anyway, Gail, I'm glad you called.
I appreciate the opportunity to uh clarify uh any confusion that existed out there.
Let's go to John and Crofton, Maryland.
You're next.
Great to have you, sir.
Hello.
Hey doing Rush.
Good.
You uh you always catch flack, even whether you deserve it or not.
Uh the way I took it was that uh Rahmanuel, who's supposed to be uh, you know, such a masterful politician, uh he got caught in the act of being himself and liberals, Democrats, uh that to me that's synonymous.
They're supposed to care for these protected classes of people uh like the disabled or whatever they call them, but uh, you know, and the special Olympics people.
They had the ones that have all the compassion and the understanding and the tolerance.
This is showing the hypocrisy, right?
And I think that's what you were trying to point out.
Right, exactly.
And they're fighting for these people over these out there calling Democrats these you know effing retards and so forth.
I mean, these people are phony baloney plastic, but in a good time rock and rollers.
Let me just say something about the president's polls.
It seems like he still has a high likability factor, and people are not crazy about his policies.
He keeps on coming down on on that approval rating, and uh unfortunately uh it's it's kind of making him out to be a Jekyll and Hyde president.
And I think that's a that's too complimentary to what this guy is all about.
He's just a scoundrel.
He's got a final solution for this country.
He hates this country, he hates most of the people in it, and I think that he's tearing the place apart.
I have a neighbor two houses away that works at the Goddard Space Uh Center.
He's been there for years.
I remember when Sputnik went up and we all all of a sudden went in a crash program to catch up with the Soviets.
I remember 1969, we landed on the moon.
We're supposed to have another moon shot in ten years, and the president is bringing down NASA.
He's he's taking away our triumphalism.
He because he hates the greatness of this country.
And of course, there are a lot of uh contractors that uh uh do uh work for NASA.
He's canceling another uh fighter first the F-22, now the F-35's gonna get canceled, and little by little he's tearing the private part of the economy apart.
I see the the economy in this country as two glasses.
One is public, in other words, the government jobs, and that's uh filled with water, and the private sector is half fill or less than half fill, and he's continuing to pour water or more government jobs in the glass that's already overflowing, and he won't put any water in the glass that needs it.
And this is he's doing all this on purpose, and he told Diane Sawyer that if he's only in for one term, he'd rather do that than be mediocre for two terms because his final solution is to destroy the country.
You gotta be sure.
You've got to be sure and watch the second bomb that I throw tomorrow on Fox and Friends because I address that very comment that he made about he'd rather be a great one-term president than a lousy two-term president.
Thanks for the call out there, John.
Be right back, folks.
Hi, welcome back, Rush Limbaugh at the EIB network.
Fastest three hours in the media.
Look at this.
The IRS is looking for 60 12-gauge pump action shotguns to arm its investigators.
Working for the IRS doesn't sound so wimpy anymore.
This is business insider.com.
The uh IRS apparently has plans to buy 60 Remington model 870 police 12 gauge pump action shotguns for the criminal investigation unit.
According to the federal business government website, these guns are serious.
The uh the Remington Parkerized Shotguns come fully loaded with a 14-inch barrel, a modified choke, Wilson Combat Ghost Ring near uh rear sight, XS4 contour bead front sight, a Knox reduced recoil adjustable stock and a speed feed ribbed black fore-end.
We're not sure what kind of IRS duty requires this kind of artillery, but it sounds badass.
Oddly, these are the only guns the IRS is allowed to use based on compatibility with IRS existing shotgun.
No, I don't think this is for Geitner.
You mean to go get him to repay.
You know, idiots I tell you what, with as much they're gonna raise taxes, they're gonna have big problems.
You uh it won't be long before they bring the military in to do this.
60 12 gauge pump action shotguns, the IRS.
Aaron in Chico, California, your next on the Rush Limbaugh program.
Hi.
Thank you, sir.
Yeah.
I had a uh I had a comment about that lady about the story with the uh school bus drivers showing up uh a couple hours late from the Super Bowl.
Oh, yeah.
And uh it just kind of reminded me that um it's an example about how liberals and their policies are to blame for these ideas that they promote about not letting kids uh have drive an initiative and kind of like not work hard or wake up uh early to get a full day out, and it kind of correlates to the youth vote not coming out for the last election, except for to come to see a celebrity when they come to see like President Obama, but after that it's just pretty much that's it.
Well, that's true.
But I don't think you you're talking about the reason they're not gonna come out and vote.
Well, yeah, because the policies they uh they set up just in as far as curriculum and school or in life, you know, don't work hard, government will take care of you, not to have a lot of initiative in drive, just like your parody is where it's don't keep score or whatever have you.
Um it just pretty much sets him up that The only reason they come out is to see a celebrity like Barack Obama or Bill Clinton for them back in the day.
But other than that, they really don't know about the issues, they aren't really educated about the issues, and of course the uh public school system doesn't really teach them about that, they just teach them about their feelings and their own.
No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
Really, that's not totally true.
The public school system does indoctrinate these kids with liberal thought.
They do, they do.
They and they take history courses and turn them into current political events with liberal analysis.
And they'll take a political science course or a history course and turn it into a one-hour bash George Bush.
Oh, they they they they do this, and that continues that starts in junior high.
They do that all the way up in high school.
Um, and that's how they prepare for future further indoctrination in college.
But you're right about the that they're still they're young people.
Uh celebrities are what attract them.
Yeah, but I mean, if you if they were to teach them the facts, the kids would say, well, wait a minute, that doesn't sound right.
But what like you said, I mean, I've known this for years, and that's how I've learned about it, just through seeing and and just studying.
They they do this all the time.
They don't teach them any facts, and I've learned so much more from listening to your program and wanting to learn more about what really true definitions are and what history is that you're taught it.
So yeah, I know they're they're not taught the right things.
The facts they're given are BS.
Yes, and if they were, they would make a whole lot better decision than what's being told to them if they were given actual truth and definition about how taxes about how rich people pay the taxes.
I don't think that there's a whole lot of critical thinking taught.
I don't think they're taught to make decisions.
I think they're taught to feel and have reactions based on that.
Well, that's by design, I imagine.
And that's by no doubt.
I mean, you you see how when you give schools that cho or parents the choice of where to send the kids to school, they send them to the schools that actually teach their kids and not just shove them in these horrible, horrible school systems in inner cities and whatnot that don't teach them.
Well, you know, you're you're absolutely right.
In fact, speaking of all this, I I think it's uh it would be apropos at this point to share with you the information that was in today's morning update on all of our great radio affiliates around the country.
Two liberal organizations have joined forces in a lawsuit.
The lawsuit that will determine the future of thousands of kids.
The teachers' union and the NAALCP have filed suit to stop New York City from get this.
Wait for it.
Teachers' unions, NAALCP filed suit to stop New York City from closing 19 underperforming schools.
In other words, the lawsuit is to make sure that mediocre schools are kept open.
The teachers' union claims that the panel for education policy, which has the authority to close failing schools, violated state law because the panel did not consider the impact on the community.
No, that they're not supposed to.
It's a school's failing, and if nobody's learning anything in there, you shut it down.
But the lawsuit goes an impact on the community.
The NAALCP argues that shutting down failing schools get this this is this is um this is like that story we read for you the other day from the UK that's preventing advertisements, asking for qualified people because it's an insult to unqualified people.
Listen to this.
The NAACP says that shutting down failing schools will hurt minority children.
Now, the reverse of that is that keeping failing schools open will help minority children.
We're talking about liberalism here.
Now, Mayor Bloomberg and the school's chancellor, Joe Klein, who was, by the way, in the Justice Department, a lawyer that led the antitrust suit against Microsoft.
School's uh Chancellor Joe Klein Mayor Bloomberg defended the closing of these 19 worthless schools.
Now, it it in a sane political environment, this would not be an issue.
I mean, in the in the detested and hated private sector, a franchise store that failed to deliver service would be closed in a heartbeat.
But in liberal land, where failure is what's rewarded, the NAALCP insanely claims majority children are hurt if they cannot stay in these factory failures.
And the teachers union claims the community will be hurt if rotten schools are closed.
Meanwhile, the Obama administration is floating ideas to lower standards in the no childs behind left program to allow more leeway for failing schools to continue operations.
I mean that I'm not making any of this up.
Obama wants to lower standards in the No Childs Behind program to allow more leeway for failing schools to continue to operate.
This that means, okay, well, we'll redefine what a failing school is.
This after Obama cut funds for the D.C. school choice program that allowed minority parents to move kids from failing public schools to great private schools.
It was working.
The kids were performing well, getting good grades, and Obama shut it down.
A liberal Democrat and an African American light-skinned with no Negro dialect when he doesn't want it, shut down a program benefiting other African Americans with or without Negro dialets.
Now, the the these minority kids, and that's that's who we're talking about here.
These minority kids are being treated like second-class citizens.
Like the last thing anybody wants is for them to actually be educated.
That's what it sounds like to me.
They're not even, you know, Rosa Parks, she refused to go to the back of the bus.
These kids are not even allowed to get on the bus of success.
Not even allowed a seat by the very people who claim to be their saviors.
And it's just classic because it works this way throughout all of society.
Liberalism, we're gonna help you.
We're gonna bring you up from the dungeon of poverty and so forth.
And they don't do it, they just make it worse.
Insanity prevails.
And it's getting hard to keep up with all the lies being discovered in the global warming story of the climate change, and it really is.
Uh the headline here, this is in the National Post of Canada, wheels fall off the global warming hysteria.
Activist scientists cooked the books to foster alarm.
It's by Lauren Gunter.
I can't recall the wheels coming off the bus of any expert-driven hysteria as fast or as completely as they are now coming off the global warming scare.
I suppose they uh they must have come off faster from Y2K at 12001 a.m. on January 1, 2000, when airliners did not fall from the sky and power plants did not shut down spontaneously, or computers did not freeze up all over the world, the air came out of the Y2K scare instantly.
Billions had been spent on preventing that disaster that never was up until midnight on the final day of 1999, then almost not a penny afterwards.
That's faster than the wheels are coming off the climate change bus.
But anthropogenic global warming of very close second.
News of the manipulations, the distortions, and frauds perpetrated to advance and preserve the environmentalist wacos cause celebra are so numerous and coming so fast, it is hard to keep up.
And then they are listed here.
IPCC, the uh headly climate unit at uh East Anglia University, the misinformation about rainforests, it's just in f in fact, so far in all, at least 16 major claims made in AR4.
That is the report for which the IPC, IPCC won its Nobel Prize, along with Al Gore.
At least 16 major claims have been shown to have originated with environmental groups rather than scientists, including the claim that climate change is already making tornado hurricanes, forest fires, and floods worse.
This doesn't surprise me.
It just, and I'm happy this is all coming out, but I this is a Canadian Post.
It's not in the U.S. media.
This you're not going to see this in U.S. media.
You're going to see it in UK media.
This is from the uh the uh the Edmonton Journal, National Post.
But I tell you, folks, uh, I never had any what's the difference of a climate scientist and a liberal activist?
They're all the same people.
All these so-called scientists are nothing more than liberal activists first.
Even if they do have a science education.
But what they did, they incorporated surveys by journalists working for nature, or employees of the World Wildlife Fund using anecdotal observations.
Anyway, a uh brief time out.
And meanwhile, Obama still says this science is irreputable.
There's no experts do not doubt the relevance of the science.
Back in a second.
It looks like Eric Holder is trying to make some amends for Rahm Emanuel and his uh his comments on the retarded.
Uh the Justice Department is now seeking, I I kid you not, I'm gonna read this here in a second, seeking to hire mentally retarded and mentally ill lawyers.
Maybe this is why they decided not to prosecute the Black Panthers, the new Black Panthers in Philadelphia.
The Civil Rights Division, this is from Justice.gov, the website.
Civil rights division encourages qualified applicants with targeted disabilities to apply.
Targeted disabilities are deafness, blindness, missing extremities, partial or complete paralysis, convulsive disorder, mental retardation, mental illness, severe distortion of limbs and or spine.
Applicants who meet the qualification requirements and are able to perform the essential functions of the physician, with or without reasonable accommodation, are encouraged to identify targeted disabilities in response to the questions in the AVU application system seeking that information.
It's right there, folks.
I'm not making it up.
Holders Justice Department is actually seeking lawyers with mental retardation and mental illness, uh complete paralysis, severe distortion of limbs or spine.
If you meet the just Justice Department qualification requirements, even though you might be mentally retarded or mentally ill, and even though you're mentally retarded, mentally ill can perform essential functions of the lawyer position, then you are urged to apply.
uh...
Yeah, in other words, what what Eric Holder's saying was, would you fit in with everybody else in our Department of Justice?
Because that's who's here now.
Would you fit in with us?
Ask yourself, small business, a lot of people are opening small businesses that are unemployed, it's the only thing they can do.
Ask yourself how big, how fast could your business grow if it were featured right here in an upcoming legal zoom commercial?
February National Start Your Business Month.
LegalZoom and I are here to help you succeed.
National Start Your Business Month is all about making it easier, faster for business people and entrepreneurs to start a business or to take it to the next level.
Now, here's how to qualify for your business to be mentioned right here in an upcoming legal zoom spot.
Whether you are starting a sole proprietorship or getting the potential liability protection and tax savings of a corporation or LLC, legal Zoom has taken what used to be a long and painful, expensive process and simplified it, made it fast and affordable.
Do your legal document this month at LegalZoom and your business just might be featured right here in an upcoming legal zoom commercial.
And when you incorporate or form an LLC through LegalZoom this month, you'll get a free website design and marketing package, including domain name and hosting for 30 days.
Now remember, LegalZoom is not a law firm, but was started by top attorneys to provide self-help services at your specific direction.
February National Start of Business Month.
Visit legalzoom.com today.
That's legalzoom.com, and you might hear your business mentioned in a commercial this month.
I think I can safely say, uh, ladies and gentlemen, that legal zoom, legalzoom.com, in association with me, L. Rushbow and the EIB Network, is doing more for small business than President Obama is doing for small business.
There's no there's no question about it.
You imagine, I mean, the uptick in business of business being mentioned in a legal zoom commercial on this program, but they're doing more for small business and being more promotive of it than even Obama, which really wouldn't take much.
Okay, I'm gonna go apply for the Justice Department, folks.
▲
Export Selection