All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 2, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:29
February 2, 2010, Tuesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Greetings, my friends, and welcome back.
Rush Limbaugh, as always, having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
And as always, half my brain tied behind my back just to make everything fair.
A telephone number, if you want to be on the program today, 800-282-2882, the email address, lrushbow at EIBnet.com.
Just a little less than one year ago, February 22nd, 2009, Newsweek ran a story by Jackie Kalmas.
After a string of costly bailout and stimulus measures, President Obama will set a goal this week to cut the annual deficit at least in half by the end of his term, administration officials said.
And then they put the lie out there.
The president inherited a deficit for 2009 of about $1.2 trillion, which will rise to more than $1.5 trillion.
Blah, blah, blah.
Every bit of this, every detail in this story is wrong.
Every assertion is a lie.
And of course, according to Newsweek, campaign promises from Obama were only meant to bamboozle the great unwashed.
But this was a proposal after his inauguration, this time last year, cut the deficit in half.
And you know, we can do it.
And there he is.
Up in Nashua, New Hampshire, another town hall meeting on jobs.
Would somebody tell me how many jobs has a town hall ever created?
How many jobs has a town hall ever saved?
He's up there announcing his jobs bill, which is a $33 billion program.
Would somebody tell me why does it take $33 billion of government money to create jobs when all it takes is for government to cut taxes?
A lot of this $33 billion is tax credits for small businesses to hire employees, but they're not going to hire if they don't have any work for these people to do.
And if you only get a $5,000 tax credit when it might cost you $75,000 to hire somebody, why take that deal?
From the New York Daily News.
Not sure if it's time to get your blood pressure checked?
Don't worry.
City of New York will tell you.
The city of New York is launching a program this week, yesterday in fact, that'll determine when patients are due for health care services like blood pressure and cholesterol checks, and then call them to schedule an appointment.
The health department will pair with 20 medical practices that use electronic health records to find these needy patients.
Then an outreach specialist hired by the city will work in the practices phoning patients to come in.
It's not a postcard that says you're overdue.
It's making the call and asking what day works best for you, said Amanda Parsons, the assistant health commissioner for primary care.
The so-called panel management program is privately funded with $1.5 million from Pfizer, the two-year pilot program, part of the mayor's strategy to bring government to New Yorkers in need.
Government-controlled health care, managing your life as you are too stupid to do it.
You liberals in New York, is this what you had in mind?
The government calling you and telling you it's time to get a cholesterol check or a blood pressure check?
Telling you you got to go to the doctor?
What happens if you screw them and don't go?
They keep calling you.
They've got your electronical medical records, electronic medical records.
The goal is to prevent those high-risk patients from going into the hospital.
Officials will target patients who are obese, have diabetes, and or heart conditions.
So it's going to discriminate even further.
It's going to call a fat.
They're going to call people with diabetes and people who have heart conditions.
And they will know because they have your medical records.
In some cases, patients said they were too busy to come in, didn't have health insurance, but the doctors were able to work on a sliding scale or refer them to other facilities and offer low-cost screening.
Coming to a city near you.
I don't think they're going to call students with STDs.
They're going to call the fat, they're going to call the diabetic, and they're going to call people with heart conditions as they get in there.
And who knows they might call students with STDs if they're known to exist on the health record.
I mean, it's unbelievable.
From thepolitico.com, Lawrence O'Donnell, who argued reform is dead, even though Democrats won't admit it.
Lawrence O'Donnell, former Democrat Hill staffer, turned talker on MessNBC, said that we're now witnessing health reforms death throes, and Democrats know it.
The party won't be able to pass another reform bill through the Senate, period.
Pelosi said, we don't have the votes for passing the Senate bill, and that should have just ended it.
Any discussion of another scenario is juvenile.
It's ridiculous.
Democrats knew they lost reform with the Massachusetts election.
Some of them, like Barney Frank, essentially said so.
The first reaction to that election that Barney Frank had was the honest reaction.
Frank later walked back his comments, but since election night, he said, Democrats have moved into full bluff mode.
We are absolutely in full fake cheerleading mode, he said.
I think Pelosi has absolutely no moves left.
I think she knows that now.
I think Harry Reid knows that, and that's why they don't bring it up.
They had a Senate leadership press conference Thursday.
It was if reporters were asking about World War I when they asked about health reform.
O'Donnell attributes the theatrics, saying we're still working on it behind closed doors to deal with a liberal base that will go bonkers if they think Democrats have quit on health care reform.
There's no such thing as let's take a pause in legislating so we can gain momentum on it.
It's insulting.
He said a reconciliation bill will not even work.
When people talk about its 51-vote threshold, they're forgetting that's just the final vote.
Every day the bill's on the floor, it will face 60-vote procedural hurdles.
For instance, should Republicans challenge a provision's inclusion and get a favorable ruling from the parliamentarian, without 60 votes, Democrats will be unable to overturn it.
So it's a moot point.
And get this from Talking Points memo, Democrats privately admit that the deal they made with Senator Ben Nelson on Medicaid funding for Nebraska was a major factor in souring the American people on health care reform.
And before that, the Louisiana purchase with Senator Mary Landrew.
And then after that, when Obama, this was the real backbreaker on the Ben Nelson thing, no question.
That was a big, big wake-up call.
But when Obama then exempted the unions, after first saying they wouldn't be exempted, then the unions trundle up there and put big pressure on him.
And they announce that's what they're going to do before they go into the White House meeting.
They get exempted from the 40% tax on Cadillac health plans.
That was it.
Then everybody realized that this was not about health care.
It was not about lowering costs.
It was not about providing more coverage to people.
It was not about anything of the sort.
There's Obama trashing banks up there in Nashua, New Hampshire at a jobs town hall.
Somebody needs to explain to me how it is that a town hall meeting creates a single job.
By the way, from the Los Angeles Times, America's wind energy industry enjoyed a banner year in 2009, thanks largely to tax credits and other incentives packed into the slush fund stimulus bill.
But even though a record 100 or 10,000 megawatts of new generating capacity came online, few jobs were created overall, and wind power manufacturing employment in particular fell, a setback for Obama's pledge to create millions of green jobs.
There was the promise Obama on the campaign trail promised to create 5 million green jobs over a decade.
The stimulus bill approved last year allocated billions of dollars to the clean energy sector.
Administration officials admit that they are nowhere near the pace of 5 million jobs.
Last month, government economists released their first tally of clean energy jobs created or saved by the stimulus, 52,000 out of 640,000 jobs created or saved.
They're not recounting what a job is to get that number, but that's bogus.
52,000 jobs.
Nowhere near to the 5 million Obama.
Do people realize everything he promises is empty?
There is nothing that the man says is substantive.
It's all hidden.
Serious, serious stuff.
By the way, you have heard me discuss Carbonite countless times.
You have signed up for Carbonite.
Many of you have sent me emails thanking me because your hard drive data was saved and backed up when your computer crashed on you.
They've expanded Carbonite now.
Carbonite, they made the online backup simple, secure, and affordable.
Now they've introduced Carbonite Pro.
Carbonite Pro is a backup plan specifically designed for your small business.
Carbonite Pro.
It saves you time and money by automatically backing up all your PCs whenever they're connected to the internet, all of them.
Carbonite Pro backs up your files securely off-site.
You can focus on serving your customers and increasing your profits.
Just one account.
The way Carbonite works is you need an account for every computer, but now with Carbonite Pro, just one account with one monthly bill gives you one centralized dashboard to monitor the backup status of all your computers.
And if anything happens, you get your files back easily so your business keeps running smoothly.
And with the dashboard application, you can see which computers are not being backed up, which need to be backed up, because somebody you can assign to your office to monitor all of the backups and all the computers.
One account, one bill, will back up as many as computers as in your office.
One account, one bill.
All your computers.
Carbonite Pro, the backup plan, backs up the files your business can't afford to lose.
Try it free.
CarbonitePro.com is the website.
A rock and pneumonia, boogie woogie flu, Johnny Rivers, Rush Limbaugh, the EIB network.
It's great to see, ladies and gentlemen, that President Obama is helping Congress get past their partisanship.
Bipartisanship is happening in Congress over what you say.
Well, listen to this from Roll Call.
Dealing a blow to an Obama administration already forced to change course in its plans to prosecute 9-11 terrorist suspects.
A bipartisan group of senators on Tuesday vowed to ban any government funds from being used for any trial in civilian court.
Republicans and Democrats alike joining together to not fund Obama's show trial of Khalid Sheikh Muhammad.
This thing better not happen in a civil court, folks, as I discussed yesterday.
A mistrial's already happened.
Obama and his stupid press spokesman have already proclaimed the guilt of these guys and said that they're going to be executed.
I mean, that defense lawyer, first thing is going to say, you have tampered with every possible jury in this country that we could put together.
McCain, McCain, I don't like, I don't like partisanship from Bobby.
I can't avoid it.
He said that Holder has obviously botched this.
Senator McCain, it's not Holder.
Holder, I don't care what anybody says, cannot do this on his own.
This is Obama.
For whatever hideous reasons, this decision was Obama's.
I still believe he's trying to impress the European left and radical Islam.
And I think that he actually wants international courts to charge Bush and Cheney officials with war crimes.
I do believe it.
And it wouldn't surprise me if he's throwing the trial.
He's out there.
I mean, look at in a civil court, you're going to give these guys constitutional rights.
One of them is the presumption of innocence.
And that's not been provided.
It's been denied them by no less than President Obama and his idiot spokesman.
Okay, back to the phones.
Alan in Butler County, Pennsylvania.
Welcome to the program, sir.
Good afternoon, Megger Dishit.
Dittos, Mr. Limbaugh.
Thank you, sir.
Thank you for taking my call.
You bet.
The air that we breathe, our atmosphere, contains a lot of different things: nitrogen, oxygen, water, vapor, particulate matter, pollutants, and carbon dioxide.
Yeah.
When we inhale, our body captures the oxygen, some water, vapor, particulate matter, and pollutants.
Yeah.
And then we exhale what the body doesn't capture.
So we're the X, the carbon dioxide that we're exhaling is the same carbon dioxide we inhale.
And therefore, there's no increase in the carbon dioxide that's in the atmosphere.
You mean from humans?
Right.
I heard you say earlier, we create carbon dioxide by breathing, but we're just passing it through our body.
Well, no, no, no.
What I read was that humans contribute via exhalation 30% of the CO2 that's out there.
You are telling me something.
And as host, you know, I'm very confident and comfortable with my own skin.
I did not know what you say.
I'm not afraid to admit that I didn't know it.
Well, I'm not going to question you.
No.
Well, I know you're not questioning me.
I've never heard your theory explained.
I'm not doubting you.
Don't misunderstand.
All right.
Okay.
Well, I appreciate the information.
Thank you very much, sir.
Have a good day.
You bet, and you do too.
And thanks for holding on.
I appreciate it.
Up next, Isidore in Linden, California.
You are next in the EIB network.
Hello.
Hello.
Hi.
Hi, True.
Hi, Rush.
Listen, my question is that this president we have is acting like a dictator, and Congress should be able to stop him from doing anything that is not right.
Yeah.
Yeah.
But remember, most of the majorities are all Democrats.
Now, we do have Kent Conrad, who came out today and said that this budget, very concerned about, it's not sustainable.
I don't think it's the path we can take as a nation.
This is a Democrat senator who said this.
And I guarantee you a lot of people in Congress know that.
A lot of people look at this budget and they're scared to death about it.
It's an election year.
We'll just have to see.
But, you know, Obama, these people are giving him what he wants.
They're trying to anyway.
The American people have stopped the health care reform.
The cap and trade was actually stopped by the discovery of the hoax that global warming is.
But still with cap and trade, guess what?
Now the EPA is going to go ahead and do it.
The EPA was given the authority to regulate CO2, but the Supreme Court.
So we could still get all the tax increase and all of the energy changes via the EPA, just by fiat, by regulation, if Congress doesn't do anything.
It's entirely possible.
Thanks to the call, Isidore, appreciate it.
CNNMoney.com.
The Copenhagen climate talks went nowhere.
The Senate's attempt to pass a global warming bill appears stuck, but that doesn't mean greenhouse gas laws aren't coming.
The EPA, spurred by a Supreme Court ruling, is racing to fill the void.
As early as March, the EPA could be required to cap greenhouse gases from things like power plants, large factories, essentially doing what Senate Democrats want without a messy vote.
Some say it's a great idea.
It could put a serious dent in greenhouse gas emissions, go a long way to cleaning up the environment.
Others say it will jeopardize investment in industry and hurt job creation.
They are right.
It most definitely will.
In the meantime, there are two stories from the UK Guardian, a very left-wing paper.
Strange case of moving weather posts and a scientist under siege in the first part of a major investigation of so-called ClimateGate emails.
One of Britain's top science writers reveals how researchers tried to hide flaws in a key study.
And in one instance, there were 40 weather posts that were positioned in places to exaggerate temperature.
I mean, this, the more, each day we learn more and more of just how much fraud and purposeful deceit there was in this whole global warming scam that's been going on for 20 years.
And here's the story.
Leaked climate change email scientists hid flaws in the data.
And this is about Phil Jones, the British climate scientist, facing fresh claims he sought to hide problems in key temperature data on which some of his work was based.
And this is a left-wing British newspaper doing the investigation.
Not one, not one U.S. journalist publication, at least the legendary mainstream media publications, have even talked about this.
It's all being done by foreign journalists.
We'll be back, my friends.
More phone calls coming right up after this.
A man, a legend, a way of life.
Learn it, love it, live it.
Everybody wants to be me.
Rush Limbaugh at the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
We have a physicist on the line from Long Island in New York.
Greetings, my friend, and welcome to you, Doctor.
All right.
Thank you, Rush.
First-time caller, long-time listener.
I'm on a cell phone, so I can't really talk long, but I did hear the comment about CO2, and I called to correct it.
You mean about the CO2 that we breathe in and breathe out gets canceling out?
Yeah, it doesn't cancel out.
You take in food through your stomach, including lots and lots of carbon, amino acids, you break them down into, and then all of the cells of your body oxidize the carbons which you get from your food and combine the oxygen you breathe in with the carbon.
You're oxidizing carbon and breathing out carbon dioxide.
Now, the other half of the cycle is the plants.
The carbon dioxide that we breathe out is food for them.
They change it into oxygen and starch.
Right.
So the net effect here is what?
How many we do contribute net to the overall amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere?
We do contribute.
Unfortunately, the fellow called in was misinformed.
We do breathe out more carbon dioxide than we take in, but plants put out more oxygen than carbon dioxide, they take in.
In fact, they love it.
The more carbon dioxide, the better.
They grow, they flourish.
Yeah, I think if they regulate it, they're going to kill more plants.
Yeah, I mean, I know that you're a physicist and you're a scientist first, but I just, I can't accept the notion that something human beings, who I believe were created, do as a virtue of our creation would contribute to the destruction of the environment we need to live.
It just makes no sense to me.
Makes no sense at all.
It's a natural process.
It's a cycle of we breathe out the carbon dioxide, and that's food for plants, and they make oxygen for us.
We're in balance, and the man-made effects don't affect the climate in the first place.
Yeah, via the process of photosynthesis.
Yeah, the plants take energy from the sun, and they make the oxygen.
Without the plants, we'd be dead, and without the carbon dioxide, the plants would be dead.
Let me ask you something else I've heard.
See if this is true.
I keep hearing from various non-scientists that we need, we're deforestating too much of the country, which we're not.
That we need as grasslands, wetlands.
We can't cut down trees because we need all of that to breathe.
Somebody once said to me, I think, I think it was a climatologist.
I'm not sure, said, we get all the photosynthesis we would need in an average lawn.
I don't know if that would do for the whole earth, but there's certainly a lot of green around, and I don't think we're in jeopardy of starving if we cut down some forests.
On the other hand, we do need the trees.
You can't wipe them all out.
Exactly, especially if we're putting more CO2 in the atmosphere via the burning of carbon fuels and so forth.
Doctor, I'm glad you called.
Thanks very much.
Ladies, there was a lot of consensus there.
Well, no consensus between a caller and this guy.
And by the way, we didn't take this call to embarrass the previous caller, Isidore.
That was not the purpose.
I just had never heard what Isidore said.
I'd never heard that.
I wasn't ashamed to admit that I didn't know it.
I mean, I'm a very confident guy, very comfortable in my own skin.
There's so little I don't know that it doesn't bother me to admit I don't know something.
So I'm glad to get the call and correct it from a physicist, a man of physics.
That's what a physicist is, for those of you in Rio Linda.
You remember, ladies and gentlemen, some few short weeks ago that I said the next shoe to drop in unemployment is state and city workers.
Remember that?
Because the stimulus money they got was about to dry up.
And they used the stimulus money to make sure that those local union workers and state union workers didn't lose their gigs.
That was stimulus money.
And the states were also using some of the money to supposedly reduce their deficits.
Well, here is a, it's actually a 10-page story at Global Economic AnalysisBlogspot.com.
And it is about massive layoffs coming in New York City, Nevada, California, Colorado, Arizona, and everywhere.
New York City may lay off 19,000 workers if state cuts aid.
New York City mayor state budget would force city layoffs.
Bloomberg's grim budget discusses in detail these layoffs.
Colorado Springs cuts into basic services, considered basic by many.
And this is what they always do.
When they're facing cuts, it's always going to be school teachers.
It's always going to be policemen.
It's always going to be firemen.
No, no, no, you can't cut them.
You can't get.
That's how they get away with raising taxes.
Drastic cuts in Phoenix.
Inquiring minds are reading City of Phoenix details plan for drastic cutbacks.
It goes on and on and on.
Sacramento County could lose $150 million in 2010, 2011.
My instincts told me this is going to happen.
There's evidence that it will.
This is, by the way, one of the things I think that's going to happen with this jobs bill, a lot of it is going to be to replenish spent stimulus money in the states so that state union workers do not lose their jobs.
That's what this jobs bill is really going to be.
It's more of Obama taking care of his own.
Now, a review of the latest Democrats in election trouble.
Our old friends at public policy polling in North Carolina have taken their first poll on the Blanch Lincoln race for Senate in Arkansas.
John Boozman will enter the Arkansas Senate race this weekend as the frontrunner.
He leads Blanche Lincoln by 56 to 33 in public policy polling's first poll of this race.
Blanche Lincoln's approval rating has sunk to just 27%.
62% of voters in the state disapprove of her.
She's at a middling 51% even within her own party.
And just 17% of Independents, 9% of Republicans are happy with how she's doing.
What it all adds up to is that Boozman is winning 89% of the Republican vote while Lincoln's at just 68% with Democrats.
And Boozman has a 66 to 20 lead with Independents as well.
It's going to be a tough year for Democrats in Arkansas.
Marion Berry and Vic Snyder already saw the writing on the wall and got out of there.
Many would like to see Lincoln quit and do the same, but it's clear that Lincoln or no Lincoln is going to be a very tough hold for Democrats, her Senate seat.
And in Arizona, as Obama and Democrat congressional leaders scramble to find a new message after a string of election defeats, Arizona Representative Gabriel Giffords appears increasingly vulnerable for her loyalty to the White House.
Just four months ago, the two-term Democrat looked so secure in her re-election that her district was rated solidly Democrat by the Cook Political Report, a quote-unquote nonpartisan newsletter that analyzes congressional races.
Since then, the rating has slipped to likely Democrat and then to Leans Democrat.
The latest drop came shortly after Republican State Senator Jonathan Patton announced he was joining three other GOP candidates to challenge Giffords.
This is the eighth congressional district, which encompasses part of Tucson and the communities in Arizona's southeastern corner.
Folks, it's looking like, I mean, even Chuck Schumer, there's nobody to run against him.
Larry Kudlow's thinking about it, but even Chuck Schumer is below 50% approval in New York.
He's either below or right at 50% approval in New York.
And in Florida, in what is really a shocker, because it's happened so quickly, Rasmussen reports suggests that Marco Rubio, the Florida House Speaker and a Reagan conservative, has now jumped to a 12-point lead over Governor Charlie Crist in the Republican primary race for the U.S. Senate seat as being vacated by Mel Martinez.
Rubio, 49%, Crist, 37%.
The new numbers mark a stunning turnaround.
Christ was the strong favorite when he first announced for the Senate seat.
Rubio, viewed as a long shot challenger, big-time long shot, because Christ is ostensibly popular as a governor.
But he cooked his goose with conservatives by embracing Obama, supporting the stimulus, and acquired the label, fairly or unfairly, as a moderate.
And moderate Republicans are not what Republican primary voters want any part of.
From the Kansas City Star, America's hunger for gasoline is unlikely to return.
The United States used more gasoline than ever in 2007 and far more than any other country.
It seemed as if America's growing appetite for gas would go on forever.
Well, it won't.
Things may never be the same.
How many times have we heard this?
Economic decline.
It's never going to be the way it was.
Well, the only way that's true is if Obama gets this budget.
If Obama gets his budget, if he gets healthcare, if he gets cap and trade, that's right.
Nothing will ever be the same.
We are looking at a choice, decline and collapse or growth and success.
The death of America or its survival.
Even when the economy picks up, three underlying trends mean the U.S. might never use as much gas again.
New standards for cars and light trucks.
The growth in the number of U.S. vehicles after surging in the last 30 years is likely to plateau, and alternative fuels will grow enough to cover increased fuel needs.
The story goes on to say that it doesn't mean gasoline will stay cheap because growing demand in countries like China and India eventually will send prices back up.
It doesn't mean gasoline will disappear.
The Energy Information Administration predicts that by 2035, petroleum will still provide 88% of the fuel for cars and light trucks, probably more.
And don't forget, the Saudi Aramco oil official really chastised Western governments last week, going out there and say, you are misleading your people by telling them that we're running out of oil and that we're going to have something to replace oil because there's nothing to replace oil.
There's not one thing, and he's right, there's not one thing that will do what oil does for energy.
And all the derivatives, when we refine oil, all the derivatives, there simply is no way to get rid of it.
We shouldn't want to.
We should be thanking our lucky stars for oil.
Oil changed standards of living all over the world.
It's just, we have got to get people educated on who liberals are and what they do.
Primarily, what they do is lie.
And they set up these premises of a utopia and nothing would ever go wrong and nobody would ever die and nobody would ever get sick.
If only we could get Limbaugh and people out of the way.
It just, they are as destructive as they have ever been, and they must be stopped at the ballot box every time we can.
Just got a flash from our official climatologist here at the EIB Network, Dr. Roy Spencer, University of Alabama, Huntsville, informing me that Mother Nature absorbs, gobbles up, uses an average of 35 million tons of CO2 per day that we produce through the burning of fossil fuels.
Mother Nature gobbles it up.
It doesn't just pile up.
Also, oh, we just, folks, we just got news of the ratings for Miss America on Saturday night.
The highest ratings they've had for the past two years and even higher than when they were last on NBC in 2004.
Four and a half million viewers.
That's over double what they had been having.
It is the highest, most watched, advertiser-supported cable show Saturday night.
The Miss America.
Awesome.
Awesome.
You people are cool.
Now, folks, remember there's a new Zycam.
There is a new way to use Zycam.
It's a spray.
It's an oral spray.
It is also a breath spray.
And you just spray it in your mouth at the strategic points.
There are four places to spray it.
And you pssh, pssh, pssh, pssh, and it tastes good.
And this is a simple way.
The first time you think you're getting a cold, that very moment, spray it in there, and then follow the instructions.
Do it every four hours or as often as you like because it's a great breath mint as well.
And it tastes good.
The kind I have is mint.
There are other flavors as well.
And there are other forms, liquid lozenges, just different kind of things that you dissolve on your tongue.
But the spray is really cool.
It's really neat.
And it's not big.
It's easy to keep it in the purse.
Remember, Zycam will prevent deep symptoms.
It will shorten the duration if you catch your cold early.
Z-I-C-A-M.
Zycam allows you to be your best.
Jimmy in Los Angeles, thank you for calling, sir.
You're next on the program.
Rush.
Yeah.
Wow, this is a great moment for me.
Thanks for taking my call, man.
You bet, Jimmy.
All right, listen, I've had a question for you about our BBD bomber.
Yeah.
Well, we get this guy, and then we question him for, what, less than an hour before we actually gave him his lawyer and mirandized him, et cetera.
Is that the truth?
That's true.
So now, all that information we got from him, isn't that inadmissible in court?
Yes.
So I'm a little confused, and if the 50 minutes was enough for us to question him for that, what good did he do anyway?
The story is he was singing like a bird.
He was singing like a bird.
And then the doctors said the latest I've heard is that he was given sedation for his, probably morphine, and he started getting a little loopy and passing out.
And that's when they said, okay, we've got to stop this.
And then the Mirandizing happened, and it's a fiasco.
It was totally, totally botched.
By the way, folks, rising Federal Housing Administration default rate foreshadows a crush of foreclosures.
Washington Post, 9.1% of FHA borrowers missed at least three payments as of December.
You know what that means?
A bailout of the FHA right around the corner.
Another exciting excursion into broadcast excellence is in the can.
And soon we'll be transported to a super secret location housed in a super secret warehouse for eventual deposit at the Limbaugh Museum of Broadcasting.
Tomorrow's already going to be Wednesday.
Fastest three hours in media, fastest week in media.
As always, is more fun than anything I do to be with you folks.
I love it, and we'll be back tomorrow to do it all over again.
▲
Export Selection