All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 27, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:43
January 27, 2010, Wednesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Are you people ready for the state of Obama tonight?
Because that's what it's going to be.
Or you might say it's the state of the unions and tonight's State of the Union show, President Obama and his first such speech, although it's what, his third or fourth address to a joint session of Congress.
Anyway, greetings, my friends.
Great to have you here.
Rush Limbaugh.
Remember, as long as I'm here, it doesn't matter where here is, although we are in a super secret location.
No one could possibly find us.
We are somewhere near Las Vegas.
As you know, I'm out here judging the Miss America pageant, 2010.
And it's been a blast.
It is a tremendous amount of work.
On Monday, we had, well, Sunday afternoon for about six or eight hours, got an orientation on Monday, 12 hours of interviews, nine and a half minutes with some of the, I got 38 of the contestants, and we finished it up Monday morning.
And last night, Tuesday night was the first of the preliminaries over at the Planet Hollywood Theater.
That goes on for the next three nights, the big televised finals on Saturday.
And, you know, these interviews are kind of interesting.
I've talked to some of these young women who know more than elected people that I've interviewed here on the radio.
It's fun to see this up close.
And the people at the Miss America Foundation are just the best I've encountered.
They are just straight down the middle, solid people, and they take this very seriously.
It is a scholarship program.
They award millions and millions and millions of dollars to women in college scholarships throughout the year.
It's just a very wholesome, wholehearted, great program, and it's an honor for me to be a part of it.
And I can't discuss any details of the contest, of course, because of conflict of interest and so forth.
I cannot reveal a thing about any specifics, but it is a fun thing.
It's televised on Saturday night from 8 to 10 Eastern on the TLC cable network.
Well, let's get into the hot news.
And there's all kinds of it, folks.
The Democrats, this is the New York Times.
From today, Democrats put a lower priority on the health bill, which is a nice way to say, slam on the brakes.
Could we also say that maybe it is a failure?
With no clear path forward on major health care legislation, Democrat leaders in Congress effectively slammed the brakes on Obama's top domestic priority on Tuesday, saying they no longer felt pressure to move quickly on a health bill after eight months of setting deadlines and missing them.
The Senate Majority Leader Dingy Harry, Democrat Nevada, deflected questions about health care.
We're not on health care now, Dingy Harry said.
We've talked a lot about it in the past, but there's no rush.
We have that audio soundbite right now.
I've had a number of meetings with the Speaker, spoken to the White House on several occasions, and we're going to find out how to proceed.
But there is no rush.
This from the guy who had to have it passed before the August recess.
Then they had to have it passed by Thanksgiving.
Then they had to have it passed by Christmas.
And of course, Nancy Pelosi said there will be a health care bill.
All of that went out the window.
And I'm still not sure.
Even if Martha Coakley had won that election instead of Scott Brown, I'm still not sure that this would have happened because as I pointed out the last time we were together, the Democrats are fleeing this ship.
And now we've got Evan Bayh and Blanche Lincoln.
They're categorized in the drive-bys as two moderate centrist Democrats.
And there's no such thing in the Senate.
I mean, that's how they're categorized with the drive-bys.
They're saying they would never, they would stop the reconciliation process if the Senate tried to go that way.
They're up for re-election.
They've got conservative states, for the most part, that they need to win if they're to be reelected.
And so they, and we have all kinds of people.
And the Democrats are now at war with one another, folks.
It is just, everybody is blaming everybody for what went wrong in Massachusetts, what's going wrong with all of these pieces of legislation that didn't happen.
Let's see.
And a CNN poll.
A couple days ago, most Americans applaud Democrats' loss of a supermajority.
Americans are divided on whether Democrat control of Congress is good for the country.
Divided?
70% is not divided.
A CNN Opinion Research Corporation survey released Monday also indicates that 7 in 10 Americans believe that the Democrats lost, that's 7 in 10 is 70% CNN.
It's a big number.
We're not going to let you get away with this 7 in 10 garbage.
70% of Americans believe that the Democrats' loss of their 60-seat supermajority in the Senate is a positive move for the country.
70%?
It's a number people get their brains and arms around.
70%.
And this, how about this spending freeze?
What a trick this is.
What's it going to do?
By 2019, it's going to save $250 billion.
That's the price of mustard for one hot dog in a baseball game.
When you consider the trillions this guy's wasted, as far as the eye can see, all this is doing is locking in place massive over-the-top spending increases last year.
It's just locking them in place.
There isn't any, I mean, they're freezing discretionary spending, the entitlement spending.
It's all the defense.
This is like Jennifer Granholm saying that the green industry in Michigan is going to create 40,000 jobs in the next 10 years.
40,000 when they're losing 600,000, a million jobs a year.
And so this is the populist Obama, the left doesn't like this.
Obama going triangulation.
James Carville's out there urging Obama, you got to bash Bush more.
You got to bash Bush more.
I think that's sabotage.
I think that's setting Hillary up.
And make no mistake, ladies and gentlemen, Mrs. Clinton is out there eyeing this.
I know she's in Afghanistan now.
I just saw some pictures.
It's not pretty.
The AP, the AP has drawn a series of pictures of Mrs. Clinton arriving.
I understand this, arriving after a long flight from somewhere.
I don't know how long the leg was, but remember I got in all kinds of trouble during the primary before Operation Chaos by correctly pointing out that a number of Americans would not want to watch a 60-plus year old woman age in office.
And these, remember I caught hell for that.
I caught, you know, there are many obvious things that you're just not supposed to say because of political correctness or sensitivity or what have you.
But these pictures, despite all that, I think Mrs. Clinton is out there and Bill Clinton and her are eyeing this situation.
Obama's even, I'm willing to be a one-term president.
Yep, I want to do the right thing.
Even if it means being a one-term, here it is.
Grab audio soundback number nine.
This is last Monday on ABC's World News tonight with the new anchorette infobabe Diane Sawyer.
And she said, even in the middle of all this coming at you, you think maybe one term is enough?
I'd rather be a really good one-term president than a mediocre two-term president.
And I believe that.
There's a tendency in Washington to think that our job description of elected officials is to get re-elected.
That's not our job description.
I will not slow down in terms of going after the big problems that this country face.
I don't want to look back on my time here and say to myself, all I was concerned about was nurturing my own popularity.
That's not why I came.
It's exactly why he's coming.
Look at, if he doesn't care about being reelected, why go through all the machinations here of changing his perception?
Why go after the banks?
Why change his procedure?
Why change his image if he's not concerned about being re-elected?
You know, they've got to be in a state of shock in the White House because the sole thing that they were relying on was what they perceived, and it was real during the campaign, Obama as a messiah, Obama as an empty canvas, a blank slate.
Anybody could make him to be whatever they wanted him to be.
And he's now just nothing more than a standard, ordinary, everyday political hack who really isn't very competent, who doesn't have any experience, certainly no executive experience.
He's got some legislative experience from the Senate in Illinois and from the U.S. Senate for 150 days and from community organizing and agitating, but he does not have any executive decision like governors do or CEOs, you know, that Buck stops with them.
He farmed everything out.
Healthcare, let Congress do it.
No, he's out there saying, by the way, I had nothing to do with that corn husker buyback, and I had nothing to do with the Louisiana purge.
His people were up in the Senate negotiating all that.
Rahm Emanuel and the boys were up there putting together all of these plans.
So he doesn't want any blame whatsoever.
He's now washing his hands of it.
This is why he didn't have his own plan ever.
He just let Congress do it.
Same thing with the slush fund on stimulus.
Charlie Cook, Investors Business Daily, Democrats Car Wreck and Slow Motion continues.
Veteran election analyst Charlie Cook wrote today that this is yesterday's dispatch.
2010 is not 1994 all over again, but though the circumstances and dynamics are different, it appears to be a nationalized election.
Often in these elections, inferior, underfunded, or less organized candidates and campaigns beat more amply funded and better prepared candidates and campaigns.
The Cook political report now predicts Republicans will win 25 to 35 House seats in the fall.
That's up from 20 to 30 seats about a month ago and 15 to 25 seats a few months before.
And if the election were held today, some of these analysts analysis said the election were held today, it would be 103 seats.
I read that yesterday, that the Democrats would lose, Republicans would pick up.
Looks like the Senate, if the election were held today, the Democrat number would go from 59 now to 52.
Anyway, brief time out here, folks.
Rush Limbaugh in Las Vegas for the next three days on the EIB network and the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Study.
Serving humanity one audience member at a time, Rush Limbaugh, with more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
New Republic.
Barack Obama faces a moment where his presidency just might collapse.
It's a liberal journal of opinion.
Do you people realize how prescient I was?
I was the only voice over a year ago now using the word failure.
I hope he fails.
And I knew that this kind of stuff.
My only fear back then was I didn't know because of the election.
I was worried seriously that this country had turned at so many people on welfare, so many people receiving some sort of government assistance that we had gone socialist.
Because that's what I knew Obama to be.
But most people do not look at these people, presidential candidates, ideologically.
I, of course, do.
And that's my new mission, as you people know, to make sure everybody looks at liberals and understands who they are.
They lie.
They can't be honest about what they want to do.
They wouldn't stand a chance.
They wouldn't get 20% of the vote in the country now, I'm convinced.
So they have to lie and they have to confuse and hide behind a mask.
And they've unmasked themselves this past year in their arrogance and conceit with their supermajority in the Senate.
And the country has finally been able to see what happens when unchecked liberalism rolls on down the highway.
And it's important that this realization be made and not lost.
This ought to be in a sane world with a super-informed populace.
This would be a 20-year death knell for liberalism in this country.
In this new republic, Barack Obama faces a moment where his presidency just might collapse.
How does this president handle a crisis?
Thus far, the answer is not at all encouraging.
The current crisis is the election in Massachusetts of Scott Brown, now the 41st Republican senator.
His arrival in Washington has sent Democrats into panic mode, fearful that they too will be swallowed by a seething electorate and caused many of them to flee in the other direction from health care reform.
In short, Barack Obama faces a moment where his presidency just might collapse, or rather risks heading into a wilderness where it would accomplish next to none of its ambitious goals, which would be a godsend, if that actually happens.
Listen to this.
Never before has a Democrat president inherited more propitious circumstances for advance.
I've got a huge black line through the page here.
The printer's got a problem, so I have to pause to figure out what a word here is.
We're trying to get it fixed, so bear with me.
For advancing reform to fruition.
And although liberals might have griped as reform pulled its way through the various fiefdoms of the Senate fiefdoms, a monumental bill ultimately emerged, an impressive work of consensus that survived the interest group ringer.
Congress was one or two perfunctory roll-call votes away from sending a bill to Obama's desk, and that's when Brown won his upset, instantly making the decision.
Really, as I said earlier, I think we had a chance to stop this beforehand because these people all knew they were governing against the will of the people.
They all knew that's what they were doing.
Now, I don't doubt that they would have twisted arms and everything they could to ram that bill through.
But the anger, the seething rage of the American people is understood by the left.
And of course, the answer is, well, they're just too stupid.
They aren't bright enough to figure out what we are doing.
In fact, let's see.
I've got a sound bite that says that, but I can't find out where it is right now.
But I do have Obama blaming Congress for the healthcare debacle.
This is number 10.
And this is also last night on ABC's World News Tonight with Diane Sawyer.
She said, people think you must say at the end of the day that this is not who I was in 2008.
These ideas, these deals with Nebraska, with Florida, 2009, I believe.
And this is what Obama said.
Let's hold on a second, Diane.
I think that this gets into a big mush.
So let's just clarify.
I didn't make a bunch of deals.
There is a legislative process that is taking place in Congress.
And I am happy to own up to the fact that I have not changed Congress and how it operates the way I would have liked.
So that's point number one.
Oh, so he had nothing to do with it.
It was Bush's fault, and now it's Congress's fault.
This guy is so full of it.
Wait a minute, Diane.
Let's get this in a big munch.
Let's clarify.
I didn't make a bunch of deals.
All right.
He sent people up there to make a bunch of deals.
It was Obama's Rahm Emanuel and everybody that was twisting arms.
The news gets even worse for these people.
CNN, Opinion Research Corporation survey released today indicates that 25% of the public thinks the stimulus package has benefited the middle class.
And once again, CNN playing with numbers.
Seven out of 10, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Seven out of ten think it's good the Democrats lost their supermajority at 70% CNN.
And now they say 25% of the public thinks the stimulus has benefited the middle class.
So for those of you who are math challenged out there, that means 75% do not believe it's helped.
This is CNN way to hide the impact of the numbers again.
One-third of the people questioned think the stimulus has helped low-income Americans, with just over 40% saying the plan has benefited business executives.
Now, those 40% are idiots.
The stimulus plan hasn't gone to business executives.
That's TARP money.
But you can't blame people for being confused.
We've got stimulus, we got slush funds, we've got the tarp money, and it's just a mess.
None of it's working.
Everybody has had a year now to see full-fledged that Obama's recipes for fixing things don't do anything but make it worse.
And by the way, it was Obama who totally made the deal with the unions.
He says, I didn't make any deals with Congress.
I didn't make any deals with Congress.
They're Congress on their own.
Oh, yeah.
He has all these union thugs come into the White House and they threaten him with whatever.
And he ends up exempting them from his Cadillac tax, 40% tax, on Cadillac insurance plans.
And he did that right out in the open.
And then, of course, he canceled his promise or didn't, he broke his promise, have C-SPAN televise all of the health care hearings.
We have that.
That's audio soundbite number 11.
And let's see.
It is.
Soundbite number 11.
This is what he said.
Your question points out to a legitimate mistake that I made during the course of the year.
And that is that we had to make so many decisions quickly in a very difficult set of circumstances that after a while, we started worrying more about getting the policy right than getting the process right.
But I campaigned on process.
Part of what I had campaigned on was changing how Washington works, opening up transparency.
And I think it is, you know, I think the healthcare debate, as it unfolded, legitimately raised concerns, not just among my opponents, but also among supporters, that we just don't know what's going on.
And it's an ugly process, and it looks like there are a bunch of backroom deals.
Well, he says he made a mistake.
I don't know if he's really apologizing there.
But did you hear?
He's interested in policy and process.
Folks, that's community organized kind of stuff.
Process is not what you want in a president.
You know people that love process.
They love the process.
As long as the process is ongoing, they're happy.
But what stops process is a solution.
The problem being culminated with a solution.
And then the process is finished.
And he loves process because that's where he gets to show his intelligence, supposedly.
So it's all falling apart right around the Democrats.
And they're still blaming Bush.
And they're still blaming me and Sarah Palin.
We'll be right back.
Don't go anywhere.
Rush Limboy in Las Vegas, judging the 2010 Miss America pageant, serving humanity simply by showing up.
Great to have you here, folks.
Great to be back with you as well.
We'll go to the phones in not too long.
800-282-2882 is the number.
You know, I think what's going on here, the liberals are hiding the decline in all of these surveys they're taking.
75% stimulus not working for the middle class, not working for anybody.
They report it as 25% say it is.
And they say seven out of 10 think it's good the Democrats lost their supermajority rather than say 70%.
They're hiding the decline just like they did in the global warming hoax, which now has been doubled down on.
Have you heard about the guy at the IPCC, who's Pachari, I think is his name?
They've been totally exposed again on the melting glaciers of the Himalayans.
Totally, totally exposed.
I mean, the whole thing is just an outright and always has been a hoax.
It's always been a political, just like everything the liberals do.
It is designed to tug your heartstrings, to make you feel guilty, to get you to go along with tax increase because you're destroying the planet.
And this is how you get your mind right.
This is how you say you're sorry.
You let people go ahead and grow governments around the world and tax you and roll back your lifestyle, all for the purposes of empowering them.
I mean, this has been an incredible 12 months.
Just an incredible 12 months.
And here from the disappointed Washington, sorry, Associated Press, with his prospects for another term brightening, Ben Bernanke will lead the Federal Reserve this year in pulling back the stimulus money it pumped out to fight the financial crisis that erupted in his first term.
The challenge will be how and when to do so.
At their first meeting of the year, Fed policymakers are likely weighing such matters, including which tools to use.
The officials began meeting Tuesday and will issue a policy statement today.
It's not known whether they will signal their time and strategy to reverse course.
With the worst of the financial crisis over, not according to my stack, foreclosures continue.
New home starts are down.
Three different foreclosure programs designed to help people are failing.
In, I think it's Kentucky or Tennessee.
The unemployment bottleneck is so bad that people cannot get on the phone, can't connect with a human being to renew their unemployment benefits.
Everybody just swamped.
And we've got a guy who's totally enamored of process.
You know who else loved process?
Michael Dukakis.
I remember him discussing that in the presidential campaign of 1988, the year this program debuted, debuted for those of you in Rio Linda.
And he said, I love policy.
I love the process.
I love the process of making policy.
Obama does too.
And Jimmy Carter, Jimmy Carter loved process.
And this is turning into Jimmy Carter too, his second term, only worse.
So the Fed considering stimulus exit strategy, I don't know what stimulus this is.
But with the worst of the financial crisis over, the Fed's gradually moving to remove some of the stimulus money before it can trigger inflation.
Some analysts think the Fed might bump up the rate it charges banks for emergency loans.
Now, remember that the Fed loaned $2 trillion to people and still hasn't told us who got it.
Is that the money they're talking about?
Are they talking about Obama's stimulus?
In any case, if it's Obama's stimulus, does it mean it failed?
If they're worried about it causing inflation, does it mean that it failed?
Look, I don't mean to depress you here, folks, but you have to know the reality of Obama's policies.
You have to know what liberalism will do.
You have to know what it will do every time it's tried so you never give it a chance again at the ballot box.
Sales of new homes sank 7.6% last month, worse than expected.
December results in the weakest year on record.
How can this be?
How can the wizards of SMART at AP be shocked again?
Did they really believe all the government involvement was going to help the housing market?
The answer is yes, because these people place all of their hope and all of their faith in government.
They really do.
Sales of new homes unexpectedly fell 7.6% last month, capping the industry's weakest year on record.
The results were the weakest since March and indicated demand remained sluggish despite newly expanded tax incentives to spur sales.
Only 374,000 homes were sold last year, down 23% from a year earlier and the weakest year on record, dating back to 1963.
And staying on the same basic line here, this is the MSNBC.com flaws plague foreclosure relief problem.
Do you recognize nothing, nothing he has done is working?
Now, from his standpoint, it might be working.
I still firmly believe that all of this was to create this kind of chaos and to create the demand for more government.
It's backfired on him.
I think what he really wanted to do here was just totally get as many people on the welfare rolls as possible, Cloud Priven, and empower himself of the Democrat Party in perpetuity.
But it's backfired because he's misread the American people.
The American people do not want to be wards of the state.
And they don't want their country to be a failure.
And they don't want to be having their president run around the world and apologize for things we've done.
They don't want terrorists being given Miranda rights.
They don't want terrorists being given U.S. constitutional rights the same as if they were U.S. citizens.
They don't want show trials of terrorists beating up their own country at a cost security alone of $200 million a year.
They do not want what Obama is.
They do not want anything to do with his ideology or his policies.
And the thing that if I ran the Republican Party, what I would be having them do is say, look at Obama's no different than Barney Frank, no different than Harry Reid, no different than Nancy Pelosi, no different than John Kerry, no different than Al Gore, no different than Clinton.
It doesn't matter which one of these people you elect.
Obama may be the most radical of all of them, but they all are liberals, and liberalism is this.
Liberalism is failure of capitalism.
It is failure of freedom.
Liberalism is outright failure of prosperity.
It's right there for everybody to see now, as clear as it's ever been.
And the Republican Party ought to be pointing this out, but I'm sure that that would be a little too controversial, a little too mean-spirited.
I'm sure that that wouldn't, moderates in our party wouldn't appreciate that kind of criticism.
In fact, ladies and gentlemen, let's soundbites four and five, Mike.
This is last Sunday afternoon, CNN's Fareed Zakaria, GPS.
During the panel discussion, he had this exchange with the New York Times Book Review editor and the author Sam Tannenhaus about conservatism.
Conservatism.
Even though there is a political revival of conservatism, you don't quite see an intellectual revival.
There are, you know, the William Buckleys and Irving Crystals of the world have yielded to the Rush Limbos.
There were a number of books about a possible Republican and conservative revival.
David Fromm wrote one.
Ross Douthett and Michael Gerson wrote one.
And they all accepted that there was a major role for government to play.
They were kind of accepting what seemed to be the shift in the inevitable interrelation between government and society.
Those ideas have not been picked up at all, as far as I can tell, by the movement on the right.
Yeah, damn right.
And they won't be.
What do you think the hell is failing here, Mr. Tannenhausen?
How many people read from and Brooke's books?
You could probably count them on one hand.
This is absurd.
Last week, maybe the week prior, I spent a lot of time on this program excoriating these people.
Remember, these were the people that said Reagan's era was over, and that we had to go get moderates to win.
This is in the aftermath of Scott Brown's election.
And we had to, yeah, the American people want higher taxes.
They want a bigger government.
They want a government more involved in their lives.
And Tannenhaus says, I don't see the right picking this up.
Why should we pick it up?
It's failing to the max as the Democrats try it.
Let's skip number and play number five.
She's talking, Farid Zakaria next talks to Perry, sorry, Peggy Noonan of the Wall Street Journal, who said this about conservatism in recent elections.
Purism took a hit in New Jersey, in Virginia, in Massachusetts.
They voted for Republicans who are conservative economically, but are very non-snarling, who are not guys who you can look at and say, that is an ideologue.
I interviewed Scott Brown, the senator-elect, I guess, from Massachusetts two days ago.
The first thing he did was compliment Obama.
Something new is going on.
It is a certain, it's a growing pragmatism among the Tea Party people who voted in Jersey, Virginia, and Massachusetts for guys they were not 100% on the page with.
You hear that?
The non-snarling Republicans.
There's something new going on out there.
Scott Brown actually complimented Obama.
The growing pragmatism among the Tea Party people who voted in Jersey, Virginia, Massachusetts for guys they were not 100% on the page with.
Yeah, well, they're 100% on the page opposing Obama.
150% on page opposing Obama.
And all they had to hear from Brown was he's the 41st vote against health care.
I mean, that's ballgame, Peggy.
That's the end of this country as we know it, if that debacle had passed.
So at the end of his program, Zakaria makes a commentary, and it's to us Republicans, and he warns us to forget Massachusetts.
The Tannenhaus premise is compelling and not so easy to refute.
Today's conservative movement, he says, is dying because it is harshly ideological, very different from the grounded philosophical movement of the past, in which there were great thinkers like William F. Buckley, Irving Kristol.
Those were the people who personified the right.
Today, Rush Limbaugh speaks for the movement.
Tannenhaus argues that right now, conservatism serves as a kind of movement of obstruction, recrimination that does not offer a thought-out set of ideas.
Nothing voters will hold on to in the long run.
So despite the Massachusetts message, I think it's an interesting book to read.
And there you have elitism and out of touchness, unmasked and on parade.
No ideas on this program, no ideas from Mark Levin's book, no ideas in any of the movement conservative people here.
Too ideological.
We're dying.
There is an ascendancy going on.
And it's harshly ideological.
Of course, the left, you see, is not harshly ideological.
No, no, no, no.
Obama's not ideological.
This is the point.
Obama is.
They all are.
Liberalism is ideological.
It is governed by it.
It is propelled by it.
That's all it is.
It's not pragmatism.
It's not compassion.
It's not love and tolerance and all that.
It is a destroyer of freedom.
Anyway, I'm long here, folks.
A brief time out.
Grab some phone calls when we come back.
Don't go away.
On the cutting edge of societal evolution, Rush Limbaugh, the all-knowing, all-caring, all-sensing, all-feeling, all-concerned, and never wrong.
Maha Rushi.
800-282-2882, Hillsdale College.
We love Hillsdale College here at the EIB Network, and we want you to as well.
They refuse to accept one penny of government money.
Why?
Simple.
Because they don't want government telling them how to teach some of the nation's brightest students.
Hillsdale President Dr. Larry Arne and the professors at Hillsdale understand the importance of limited government and real freedom, and they teach it from the get-go of this country.
The students at Hillsdale are required to study and understand the United States Constitution.
They learn about the great American principles upon which the country was founded and why they work.
America's in the middle of a constitutional crisis right now, and Hillsdale wants all of you to understand the Constitution as well as understand the dangers of rampant government intrusion into our lives and how critical it is that we return to our constitutional principles now.
That is why, my friends, Hillsdale is inviting you to a free online constitutional town hall this Saturday.
Go to constitutiontownhall.com right now and register to log on to the free seminar that will equip you to help revive and defend the Constitution.
ConstitutionTownhall.com.
You can read the agenda for this free online crash course in the Constitution and what you can learn.
You'll learn from the same great professors that Hillsdale students learn from.
The great thing to do, grab a liberal or grab somebody in your family that may not be interested, somebody that's young going through the public school system and have them watch this with you.
ConstitutionTownhall.com.
You will be amazed at what a great teaching tool that it is.
Now, these clips from Fareed Zakaria and Peggy Noonan, they're hilarious.
They're actually hilarious.
You have elitism on parade.
You have a bunch of strident ideologues who, because of their manner of speaking, think that they are not.
And they convince you that you're not.
And that they are pragmatic and logical and thoughtful and very, very, very intellectual, smarter than the rest of us.
And of course, we Neanderthals on the right.
No ideas here.
How can you speak of ideas as I do and not be an ideologue?
An ideologue for liberty is an ideologue for free society.
That's a good ideologue.
I, we are great ideologues.
It doesn't mean we agree with all details and all points.
It doesn't mean we're close-minded.
It doesn't mean that we're narrow-minded, but it means we agree in the natural rights of man.
And an ideologue on the left means promoting one or more forms of tyranny.
It's the opposite of promoting liberty.
And so it's an ideology to be rejected and detested.
And it's on parade, unfettered right now.
In fact, they're going and starting with the State of Obama speech tonight.
They're going to do their best to say that they're moving in a different direction.
Going to be populist now, going to bash the banks.
In fact, I have some hilarious pieces.
I've got my own State of Obama stack.
And in the monologue segment of the next hour, I'm going to show you and illustrate for you the various pieces of advice Obama is getting on what he should do.
For example, somebody at the Politico staff, Democrats differ on advice for speech.
They asked Democrats on Capitol Hill and in state houses around the country what they want to hear from Obama during the state of Obama speech tonight.
Number one, show your anger.
Number two, talk about jobs.
Number three, make a decision on health care.
Number four, bash Wall Street.
And number five, keep blaming Republicans.
Now, that is the recipe of a bunch of anti-liberty ideologues, ladies and gentlemen.
Blame Republicans, show your anger.
My God, you people have done the best job of showing your anger of any political party I have ever witnessed.
Talk about jobs.
Well, he's had job summits.
He's had the stimulus package.
What more do you want to do?
Bash Wall Street.
He doesn't need the advice to do that.
He's doing it.
And keep blaming Republicans.
It's part of Obama's natural existence.
Blame Bush.
These people are getting exactly what they want, and they're still not happy.
It's the fastest three hours in media, and the first one is already gone.
Now, I promise we'll get the phone calls early in the next hour.
People have been lined up and on hold for the entire hour, which is the natural situation here.
And I appreciate your patience.
I really do.
Some people wait two hours and a half to get on this program.
That's how big a deal it is to most people.
You shall be rewarded for your patience soon in the next hour.
We'll be back and continue and get into what the Democrats are telling Obama he needs to do in his state of Obama speech tonight.
▲
Export Selection