All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 19, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:17
January 19, 2010, Tuesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hey, we're back.
It's Rush Limbaugh.
This is the one and only Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
I, your host, El Rushbaugh, the all-knowing, all-caring, all-sensing, all-feeling, all-concerned, all everything, Maha Rushi, a doctor of democracy and America's truth detector.
Telephone number if you want to be on the program, we'll get a lot of your calls this hour, hopefully.
Number 800-282-2882.
Well, it turns out, ladies and gentlemen, there will be an exit poll tonight.
Scott Rasmussen has stepped up and will pay for his own exit poll.
The Rasmussen reports outfit will pay for their own exit poll, filling the gap that the drive-by media left because it's either too cheap to do it, or things were too chaotic and they didn't think it was a close race.
They didn't set the progress bar in motion, or they just don't want to know what really happened to liberalism in Massachusetts.
That from John Fund.
And I wouldn't discount C as a reason they didn't do it at all, not wanting to know what really happened to liberalism in Massachusetts.
Let's see.
This is via Fox Nation.
And I got some pictures.
I can't obviously show them to you.
Well, I might be able to.
No, I don't have the ability to zoom this camera as easy as I did the other one.
So you just have to trust me.
I will link to this at rushlimbaugh.com.
Martha Coakley can't fill a gym and John Kerry can't fill a street.
Via Fox Nation, Martha Coakley held a rally yesterday at a middle school and could not fill the gym.
It was three quarters empty.
They had to pull a curtain across the middle of the gym to give the appearance of a full room.
Meanwhile, John Kerry held a rally for Marcia Coakley this weekend in Worcester and could not fill the street.
Red Mass Group reported they had John Kerry, their sitting U.S. Senator Jim McGovern, their sitting U.S. Congressman, and a supporter of terrorist Tim Murray, our sitting lieutenant governor and the former mayor of Worcester and the current mayor of Worcester, Joe O'Brien.
They still only turned out maybe 150 people.
Two hours later, there were thousands showing up for Scott Brown a couple blocks down the street in Worcester.
We had a call from a woman who saw both of these.
It's what she was talking about.
I thought this was pathetic and showed the weakness of their campaign.
And this picture of the vacant street for the John Kerry rally is...
Let's see if I can do this.
Let me see if I can zoom in on this.
That's it for you watching in high definition.
If I get a good idea, that is the John Kerry rally in the street with less than 150 people.
We don't have a picture of the gym.
I'm zooming out now on the high-definition camera to get back to the normal screen fill.
What, Mr. Snurley?
You're looking at chomping it a bit to say some.
Oh, I know.
Well, it's not that the Zoom doesn't work.
I used to have a potentiometer to do it.
Now I have a wireless IR remote.
It was easy to faster.
I didn't know I would have the dexterity to get it done, but I did.
Of course it looks sharp.
Of course it looks sharp on high definition.
There's no question about it.
Okay, John McCormick.
This is the man that one of Coakley's operatives, Meehan, knocked to the floor, knocked to the sidewalk last week.
He has a piece in the Weekly Standard, Massachusetts Election Results, What to Watch For.
Assuming that the Massachusetts election results page doesn't crash due to a tremendous amount of traffic, what should one be looking for after the polls close at 8 o'clock tonight and numbers begin pouring in?
The Cook Political Reports election whiz, David Wasserman writes in an email to the Equally Standard Western Massachusetts.
Watch that.
Coakley needs a huge margin out of what I call the Rachel Maddow Belt, the Berkshires, where she has roots, the Pioneer Valley.
She probably needs a 5,000-vote lead out of Amherst and high turnout in places like Springfield, Pittsfield, and Northampton.
Watch the I-495 ring.
This is Brown's bread and butter.
He needs to rack up big leads in towns like Haverhill, Marlboro, and his home area near Wrentham and Foxborough.
These are the places where Mitt Romney broke through to win the governorship in 2002.
Also, keep an eye on the Cape and southeastern Massachusetts, the Kennedy belt.
Barnstable and Plymouth, or Barnstable, Plymouth counties are presumably the places where Kennedy's memory ought to rescue Coakley in the 11th hour, if it's to happen.
Brown will probably narrowly win the towns of Plymouth and Barnstable, which are usual beldwethers.
If Coakley carries either, she'll probably be on her way to winning statewide.
If Brown wins both with more than 55%, watch out.
Also, watch for the 8th CD.
The heart of liberal Massachusetts needs to come out in a big way for Coakley.
If she is to have a shot, Cambridge should turn out dependably, but will the Boston machine crank out votes at the same rate as other places in the state?
Watch the Catholic South Shore.
The questionnaire: will working-class Democrats stick with their party or defect to Scott Brown?
This is a key area to watch in that respect.
Brown will probably win Braintree and Weymouth, but the town to watch is Quincy.
If Coakley can't hold on to Quincy, she'll probably lose.
And watch the ethnic cities.
Does Coakley get at least half of Obama's votes in each of Worcester, Fall River, New Bedford, Lowell, and Lawrence?
These are places that will vote Democrat two to one or more, but where voters need lots of engagement to mobilize.
So that's what to look for.
And of course, Scott Rassmusson now does have plans to do exit polling on the way out of the poll.
I was kind of looking forward to there not being any just to actually have to wait until real votes are counted to have an idea of what's going on.
Because, you know, we trust Rassmuston, but some of these other people, the consortium of exit polls that put together, paid for by the big networks, cable and broadcast.
And they all get the same data.
And they all get it in waves, 2 o'clock, 5 o'clock, 7 o'clock, 3 or 1 waves during the day.
And you remember during 2004, the people that were releasing exit poll data gummied them up, jimmied them up, and had John Kerry winning in Florida and Ohio and so forth.
And then the votes started being counted, and the exit polls were worthless.
They were nowhere near accurate.
So much so that the Democrats started charging fraud that the real vote had to.
I mean, look at the exit.
The exit poll said that Kerry won those dates and he didn't.
There's fraud here.
We got it.
Somebody tampered with the real vote, they said.
So now we will have exit polling data from Scott Rassmustin's group.
It would have been interesting to actually have to watch an election without an exit poll and watch real votes being counted as the first sign or indication.
Of course, exit polling data, the early releases at 2 and 5 o'clock before polls close.
They can also be used to suppress or get out the vote, whichever the drive-by media consortium that pays for those exit polls wants.
Wall Street Journal today, U.S. stocks opened slightly above the flat line on Tuesday as enthusiasm for health care stocks soared ahead of the Massachusetts election today.
Financials lagged a little bit after Citigroup reported a quarterly loss after three quarters of profit.
Pharmaceutical giants Merck and Pfizer were each up 1.7% as the healthcare sector soared ahead of the key election to replace Ted Kennedy, potentially undermining the passage of congressional health care.
Bottom line here, let me check it here real quick here, folks.
106, Dow Jones Industrial Average is up 106, 10,715.
And all of this is based on the thought on the belief that a Republican will win Ted Kennedy's seat.
This is astounding.
You know this in trade website where you can actually go and wager on the outcome.
Last week, it turned for the first time to Scott Brown, and it's gotten even bigger.
This is people all over the country on the net putting real money on the outcome, and it's Scott Brown big time and Wall Street apparently getting a head start here on the same thing.
Snurdly, if you're waiting for me to say it, I'm not going to say it.
I'm not.
I am not going to say it.
Not going to go there.
What is it?
Wouldn't be prudent.
Wouldn't be prudent.
Staff here trying to goad me into a highly controversial media tweak type comment, but I, using my instincts, shall refrain.
May I have the attention of all of you business owners in the state of Florida?
I have an article from Monday's South Florida Business Journal.
This is out of Miami, I think.
Not sure where it's out of, but I think it's out of Miami.
Florida employers already have a lot to worry about in 2010, a sluggish economic recovery first and foremost.
Now, add to that an unemployment compensation tax rate or tax increase that in its worst case could increase their minimum payment by more than 1,000% from $8.40 per employee to $130 per employee.
The rate change went into effect January 1st, unbeknownst to many employers.
It'll cost them an additional $1.2 billion this year, according to David Daniel, the vice president of government affairs at the Florida Chamber of Commerce.
To say that we're very worried about it is mildly understating it, said David Daniel.
The new rate was calculated by the Florida Department of Revenue for Florida's Unemployment Compensation Trust Fund, which uses automatic triggers to increase or decrease unemployment compensation taxes based on its current balance.
When it reaches a low of 4% of the taxable payrolls, it goes up.
When it reaches 5% of the taxable payrolls, it goes down.
When Florida's unemployment rate spiked to 11.2% in October, the highest it's been 34 years, it triggered the tax increase.
Unemployment compensation, and these benefits are being extended now for the longest time in history, breaking the record for the length of time unemployment compensation was extended through in 1982.
And this is in itself leading to more unemployment.
It is contributing, always does.
It contributes more and more to people seeming just not seeking work, having no interest in finding a job.
Try this.
Well, let me take a break, but I'll give you the teas on this.
Since 1970, and 1970 is a very, very important year culturally in the United States, 1969, 1970.
That is the point in time in American history when the modern feminazi version of feminism got started.
I first encountered it when I was my first job as a disc jockey at age 17, a junior in Haskrule, working at the local radio station in my hometown of Cape Girardeau, Missouri.
And local radio stations, small towns, have to do anything they can to scrape and save and sell advertising.
One of the things that they did was to sell remote broadcasts, which I always hated.
We had this little device, two turntables on it, little control board, and it was hooked up with a direct line to the radio station.
It was on-air quality.
We had to go out there and actually do this every Saturday morning at Sears.
Of course, the big hook there was a live broadcast would attract the local townspeople to see the star disc jockey actually play radio announcer in public.
And this particular edition, it went on five or six weeks.
Sears paid for it.
And it was my first foray into public service broadcasting.
It was, in addition to playing records and talking about all the wonderful things going on at Sears that day, I would bring in local students from my junior Haskrule to discuss what was going on in their lives.
And one of the girls that came in went on a feminist rant.
I don't remember exactly what she said, but it was all about equal rights, how women are being trampled on, and her focus in her life was going to make sure equal rights for women.
And I'm sitting here, what the hell is this?
At this point, I'm just a disc jockey.
I'm trying to think of clever things to say over the intros to Donnie Osmond Records.
And I've got this activist at junior high, ripping me apart for being a guy.
And how guys are just stepping on women and tamping them down, and it's going to change.
This is happening Saturday morning at Sears.
There are three students on the panel, and the other two didn't know what the hell she was talking about either.
But it didn't take long for me to figure out.
After that, I moved to Pittsburgh not long afterwards, and I encountered it full speed ahead, Daddy O.
I mean, you tell a woman she was good looking, and you were insulting her.
You were ignoring the brain.
You were objectifying her.
I mean, this stuff really happened.
You couldn't open a car door.
I mean, it was militant in 1970, 71, 72.
You think you have no idea.
It was the worst time in the world to be 21 or 22.
So anyway, here's the headline to this story coming up.
More men now get an economic boost from marriage than do women.
This is an AP story.
The subhead is, since 1970, women have outpaced men in education and in earnings growth.
Now, my first reaction to this was, other than the astounding nature of this story, well, when did this happen?
Because as recently as last year, we kept hearing about the pay inequity that women still only earn 70 cents for every dollar men earn.
Now, all of a sudden, you know, one of the old clichés that women hated was that women always marry up.
You've heard that, Snirdly.
You heard that, Dawn?
Women always marry up.
And women hated that, but it meant that they always moved up economically when they got married.
What they're saying now is it is men who are moving up when they get married.
I'll have details, your phone calls, and further updates on what's happening in Massachusetts after this.
That's right, my friends.
It's all patriotic music today in a bumper rotation in honor of what might happen in the election day in Massachusetts.
And while it is still permissible and legal to play patriotic music in public over the broadcast airwaves, my friends, I, as you know, am a proud holder of an MA degree.
By the way, that feminist story was high school.
It was not junior high.
It was hassrel.
Our high school started at the 10th grade, and that's why I got confused.
I was a junior in high school.
It wasn't junior high.
It was in Haskru.
And I don't remember the girl's name.
I just remember she was a brunette.
I just remember sitting there going, what the hell is happening here?
And I do remember getting into an argument about it.
It was very, very polite and so forth.
She wasn't quite radicalized yet.
I could tell she had just read something on this.
And oh yeah, she's going to town on it.
I am a proud holder of an MA degree.
It stands for Master of Analogies.
Master of Analogies.
What I do on this broadcast is create theater of the mind.
That's what a really, really good radio announcer does.
There are no pictures in radio.
You paint them for the audience.
The audience helps in painting its own picture if the radio announcer is really, really good.
So join me as we walk into a casino.
Would you step up to the roulette wheel and bet losing your family photos forever?
Would you double down at the blackjack table by betting the important personal and business files on your computer, knowing that if you lost, you would never get them back?
Well, that's what you're doing every time you turn on your computer if you don't have Carbonite online backup.
You see, my friends, Carbonite safely, securely automatically backs up your computer off-site whenever you're connected to the internet.
You don't even see it.
Happens in the background.
With Carbonite, when the odds catch up with you and you have your inevitable computer disaster, it's going to happen.
You'll feel the joy of getting back your pictures, your files in a few simple steps.
I get testimonial emails from grateful Carbonite customers every day.
Unlimited backup for your PC or Mac, only 55 bucks a year at Carbonite.com.
And if you use offer code RUSH, a genuine 15-day free trial, two free months, if you decide to buy.
Carbonite.com offer code Rush.
Now, historically, marriage was the surest route to financial security for women.
Nowadays, it's men who are increasingly getting the biggest economic boost from tying the knot, according to a new analysis of census data.
The changes summarized in a Pew Research Center report being released today reflect the proliferation of working wives over the past 40 years, a period in which American women outpaced men in both education and earnings growth.
Well, that's because colleges have been chickified.
Men aren't showing up in as many numbers as they used to.
Women do have greater enrollments at the institutions of supposed higher learning.
From an economic perspective, these trends have contributed to a gender role reversal in the gains from marriage.
Say the authors of the report, Richard Fry and DeVera Cohn.
In the past, when relatively few wives worked, marriage enhanced the economic status of women more than that of men, but that's all turned around.
One barometer is median household income, which rose 60% between 1970 and 2007 for married men, married women and unmarried women, but only 16% for unmarried men.
The report focused on U.S.-born men and women aged 30 to 34.
This is what we have done to boys and men.
The feminists, the feminazis have been working for years to this end.
Advance women by diminishing men.
All patriotic music all day on the EIB network with an occasional bowl thrown to the leftists in this audience to be balanced.
And so this, ladies and gentlemen, the Cuban national anthem, just for the left.
You just know when I play this, the left is out there having wet dreams about the Cuban healthcare system, folks.
Welcome back, El Rushbo, serving humanity on the EIB network.
All right, that's enough of the Cuban national anthem.
Thank you.
By the way, on this, more men get economic boosts from marriage.
The dates 1970, 2007 to the dates, the people aged of, what is it, 30 to 44, the gains that women have made in earnings and education are a notable reflection of a range of efforts to promote equal opportunities, said somebody named Cohn in a phone interview, but the earnings gap has not yet closed.
Well, I can't have it both ways here.
How can the earnings gap not have closed and yet more men are marrying up than ever before?
That women are earning more than men are, if the earnings gap hasn't closed.
Somebody named Kuntz, who is Stephanie Kuntz, C-O-O-N-T-Z.
Lest anybody accuse me of saying something that I didn't say, which happens multiple times each day on this program, C-O-O-N-T-Z.
Stephanie Kuntz, history professor, Evergreen, State College in Olympia, Washington, who writes often about marriage, said that she's been struck by the dramatic loss of manufacturing jobs that in the past had enabled many men without college education to earn high enough wages to raise a family.
The loss of those jobs, said Kuntz, is something no feminist would take pleasure in.
If it weren't for the gains of the women's movement, which I've always liked when walking behind it, if it weren't for the gains of the women's movement, which have produced a steady equalization of women's wages and new incentives for women to get more education, most families would have stagnated in their living standards even before the recession.
Unmarried men with college degrees, worthless now because of Obama, made income gains of 15%, but were outpaced by the 28% gains of unmarried women with degrees.
See, the feminists have been working for years toward this end.
Suppressing boys and men, rather than lifting everybody, the feminazis make it a gender war with many battles taking place.
But all this BS anyway.
There's two reasons why there's BS.
The reason that women are working is to keep up with taxes.
Most families are two-income families because they have to be.
Another reason why men more than ever before are marrying up is that many of them are marrying other men, which this story does not touch on.
But I would be remiss if I didn't throw it in a mix.
It does not is that, no, it doesn't talk about what men lose.
No, it doesn't say what men lose.
This is what they gain.
Oh, Jake Tapper, ABC News, Voinovich, I am not a vote for the health care bill.
Senator Voinovich, Republican Ohio, met with Obama today at the White House to discuss the national debt.
The main political story of the day, the Massachusetts Senate race, was topic A when he spoke to reporters.
When he was asked about the Senate race in Massachusetts and the future of health care reform, Voinovich said he's still opposed to the pending legislation.
That's out of the question.
I'm not a vote for the health care bill, period, he told depressed and despondent reporters.
Vointovich said that he discussed with the president his idea for a bipartisan commission to focus on bringing down the debt, which would be the defeat of Barack Obama in 2012 and the defeat of Barack Obama's legislation starting now.
A bipartisan commission?
Whatever you're going to pay the bipartisan commission, pay me.
I just gave you the answer for hell's bells here.
Are they serious?
A bipartisan blue-ribbon commission to focus on bringing down the national debt, increasing revenue?
Good.
Gully.
My friends, you cut taxes and you cut spending bills.
Just freeze.
Just every budget item to spend at the rate of inflation increase every year.
Just get rid of all these crazy baselines.
The only blue-ribbon commission to focus on bringing down the national debt, increasing revenue?
He said Obama's main concern with that suggestion is whether there is support for it.
What the hell does he think the anger is all about out there?
The anger is at him and his reckless spending.
Oh, you got to hear this before we get back to the phones.
This is, actually, I think it's today in Massachusetts, wherever it's at a Martha Coakley campaign office where they're melting down out there.
And it's an exchange between two unidentified men and an unidentified female reporter and an unidentified male cameraman about the reporter's presence in the Coakley office.
Number 25.
Number 25.
I forgot to tell a broadcast engineer it's number 25, so I'm vamping.
What does that mean?
It means we'd like a free, unbiased press.
And we are unbiased.
Get out of our office.
Touch women in here.
You do that.
And you'll be arrested.
Get the f ⁇ ing.
It's illegal to film on private property, Robert.
We can have you arrested.
Freaking paparazzi.
Away from the door.
This is private property.
From the sidewalk.
I'm going to call the police who continues to throw me on private property.
She's in violation of my rights, my civil rights.
Which we still have in spite of Nazis like you.
That's Coakley campaign workers calling reporters, filming them, videotaping them, Nazis.
Paparazzi melting down out there in the Coakley campaign.
I'm not sure when this is.
I just got the link today, but I don't know when it actually happened, I think today in Massachusetts.
Now, this afternoon, Washington, the White House Daily Press brief with the brilliant Robert Gibbs.
Jake Tapper, does the president think that the fact that it's so close has any reflection at all on him or his agenda or his governing style?
I think there is obviously, and this isn't something that's known simply because there's an election in one state.
I think there's a tremendous amount of upset and anger in this country about where we are economically.
That's not a surprise to us in this administration because, Jake, in many ways, we're here because of that upset and anger.
That upset and anger, quite frankly, dates much farther back than simply the 2008 election.
We have seen an economic downturn and collapse that we haven't seen since the late 1920s and the early 1930s.
I think that is going to be the source of, rightfully so, a lot of frustration.
Okay, so there's Gibbs saying the anger in Massachusetts is anger at Bush.
Now they're in denial, or else he knows he's lying and spinning the press.
The anger is at Obama.
The anger is at health care reform and all of the spending.
The anger is there are no jobs.
The anger is that Obama's doing nothing to create jobs, only to destroy them.
That's what they're mad about, Gibbs.
And I'm not sure that they actually know that.
Their arrogance and ego may prevent them from delving into reality.
Here's David, Bristol, Tennessee.
Glad you waited, sir.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Yeah, Rush.
Well, just to further demonstrate that, first off, 1989 dittos to you.
Thank you, sir, very much.
Is this not the same press during the Swimmer's funeral that christened him, meaning Obama, the fourth Kennedy brother?
Yeah, that's right.
Chris Matthews.
Chris Matthews called Obama the last Kennedy brother.
Right, and that would therefore cinch a lock on that seat within him.
Yeah.
Yeah, but then on the same network yesterday or the night before, Howard Feynman said this is it for the Kennedy era.
Yeah, when he passed away, that was the end of it.
But not if Obama's the last surviving Kennedy brother.
Yeah, so what happened?
Well, I think his policies came into play, and then that was the end of that.
What happened was it was always a bunch of spin and PR and wish in the first place.
Obama, the last surviving Kennedy brother.
That really ticked off Bill Clinton because Bill Clinton was the first black president.
If there was ever a Kennedy brother, it should have been Clinton in his mind.
I mean, hell, he did the same kind of stuff JFK did.
He did it in the White House.
And he was at Boise State when JFK was in the White House.
He met him in the Rose Garden.
That ticked off a lot of people.
Last surviving Kennedy brother.
Barack Obama.
Ladies and gentlemen, the federal government's been gathering data for the 2010 census.
Scammers see this time as a chance to convince consumers that they are from the government conducting the census themselves.
So seriously, the big question is, how do you tell the difference between a U.S. census worker and a con artist?
Well, the Better Business Bureau offers this advice.
If a Census Bureau worker knocks on your door, he or she will have a badge, a handheld device, a Census Bureau canvas bag, and a confidentiality notice.
Ask to see the badge before answering questions.
And, of course, never invite strangers into your home, as Skip Gates learned.
Census workers are currently verifying only address information.
Do not give your social security number or credit card or banking information to anybody, even if they claim they need it for the U.S. Census.
Census workers will not ask for banking and financial information, nor will they solicit donations.
Eventually, census workers may contact you by telephone, by mail, or in person at home.
However, they will not contact you by email.
So be on the lookout for email scams that refer to the census.
Never click on a link or open attachments in an email that purports to be from the U.S. Census Bureau.
You can still do all that and still lose your identity.
No one's going to stop it all.
But I see stuff like this.
And the first thing I always think about is lifelock.
You could go ahead and have lifelock and be an idiot.
And you could open a census worker's email and you're going to let them into the house.
They don't have a badge.
You could go through all that, and you probably, more than likely, much more than likely, would not lose your identity because it would be caught before it happened by Life Lock.
They help protect your information.
They never sell it like some other companies do, and their Life Lock Identity Alert System is the best there is.
Just call them 800-440-4833 and save 10% off your Life Lock membership simply by mentioning the promo code Rush.
It's only $10 a month anyway.
800-440-4833 for Lifelock.
And welcome back.
It's Rush Limbos serving humanity, having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
From the ABC News Boston affiliate, WCVB, Secretary of State in Massachusetts, William Galvin, says he will not delay the swearing-in process if Scott Brown's elected to fill the Senate seat of Ted Kennedy, but he would only announce an unofficial winner if the results are decisive.
He will only announce an unofficial winner to Congress before the results get certified if the outcome is decisive.
So if it's close, all absentee ballots will be counted, which could take up to 10 days.
Also from the San Francisco Chronicle, long story on this tight Massachusetts race, alarming California Democrats.
It's not just California Democrats.
New York Democrats are alarmed.
I mean, George Pataki has not stated that he's going to run, but he's polling ahead of Christian Gillibrand.
And Harold Ford, you know, is toying around with the idea of getting in the race.
You imagine Republican senators in both New York and Massachusetts.
Now, all of you people on the left who say, I'm going to give you a reality check.
You say that we lose health care reform and Brown wins.
We'll lose healthcare.
No.
We're going to save or lose bad health care reform.
Anyone in their right mind who would like to improve health care delivery or make it more efficient, more affordable, would not say health care reform is at risk.
They would say dumping this abomination would be step one in really reforming healthcare.
And Sally Quinn, well-noted doyen of society of Washington and Georgetown and noted religion writer for the Washington Post, was on the O'Reilly factor last night.
And O'Reilly said, Karl Rove doesn't believe that President Obama will be hurt that much.
I do if Brown wins.
What do you think, Ms. Quinn?
I don't think he will be that hurt, but I think that there are a number of factors here.
It's not as black and white as it may seem.
First of all, Scott Brown is a hunk.
And I think that the fact that he posed semi-nude in a magazine gave him a huge advantage.
Whoa, there you have it, the religion writer at the Washington Post saying that Scott Brown is winning because of the arousal gap.
Now, he posed semi-nude for Cosmo in 1982.
1982.
I mean, if they were going to try to make that an issue in the campaign, they would have tried.
I'm sure they did.
I'm sure they polled it.
But that's 25, 27 years ago, 28 years ago that he posed nude, semi-nude in Cosmo.
So the arousal gap.
Barney Frank also listen to this.
This audio soundbite number 12 on the radio last Friday.
We have a serious constitutional problem.
Did this plan be shut down?
It is anti-Democratic.
I think we should now be crusading.
Maybe some Republicans will join us to amend the rules of the Senate.
God didn't create the filibuster.
It's part of the Senate rules.
Oh, now we've got to get rid of the filibuster rule in the Senate.
We've got to get rid of 60 votes.
Oh, it's just so darning damning for the Republicans and the Democrats.
The Democrats can't get anything done.
They need 60 votes.
And I guarantee you, if the Republicans ever take back the Senate, if we ever did get rid of 60, they'd change the rule right back to 60.
They changed the rules in the middle of the game to benefit themselves.
Folks, get this.
The Boston Globe calls the election for Martha Coakley 50 to 49.
They actually did.
They put up an interactive map.
It's been taken down now, but they put it up eight hours before the polls closed.
And you can roll your cursor over any county, any city, and find the results.
They've pulled it down, but they have Coakley eking out a 50 to 49 victory.
Let's just see what happens tonight.
If it kind of turns out that way and the Globe knew about it eight hours before the polls closed, back tomorrow.
▲
Export Selection