All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 8, 2009 - Rush Limbaugh Program
34:25
December 8, 2009, Tuesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Maybe, uh uh, ladies and gentlemen, uh maybe in understanding the competing theories as to what Copenhagen is really all about.
Maybe we need to turn to that uh noted philosopher, the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, who would probably analyze the latest information on the Danish texts I just told you about as follows.
The white people of Europe are taking over the world again.
That sounds like what's going on.
Greetings and welcome back, uh, Rush Limbaugh, the EIB network and the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
I mean, look, we now have this report out of Copenhagen.
It's a leaked uh document here to the UK Guardian that really what's going to happen here's a swindle, that the U.S. and the UK and Denmark, and we don't know who else, are gonna wrest control of all things climate from the United Nations, and they are going to impose emissions limits on poor countries, which is which is designed to keep them poor.
I mean, you can any country that's experiencing experiencing economic growth will be uh expanding its carbon emissions, its carbon footprint, it's it's it's it's a law of nature.
And the poor countries have always been exempt from Kyoto, from all of these things.
But now all bets are up.
Now they're gonna have limits.
They're gonna make sure they never grow, they're gonna always stay poor.
Now, when you're talking about the UK and Denmark, you're talking about, as Reverend Wright would say, the white people of Europe.
You might say, but wait a minute, Rush, that doesn't work because the guy running America is a black guy.
To which Reverend Wright would say, Who's his Goldman Sachs may be running America?
And Goldman Sachs may be preparing to profit from being in the middleman on the carbon trades engineering by the white Europeans who are taking over the world again.
So maybe the viewpoint of the Reverend Wright will go a long way in explaining what's what's happening here.
Anyway, great to have you back.
Telephone number if you want to be on the Rush Limbaugh program, 800-282-2882, the email address.com.
This is from uh Chicago Booth.edu.
Uh the effective newspaper entry and exit on electoral politics.
This is from the faculty at this uh at this school.
And it is uh actually this comes from National Bureau of Economic Research.
We use new data on entries and exits of U.S. daily newspapers from 1869 to 2004 to estimate effects on political participation, uh, party vote shares and electoral competitiveness competitiveness.
Now, our identification strategy exploits the precise timing of these events and allows let me skip with the gibberish to sum this up.
You have a study here done by Ivy Leaguers who find that newspapers do not affect the composition of the vote since the introduction of radio and in television.
In other words, for a very, very long time, newspapers have only a very small influence on the size of the vote.
And I would say that's even more true today, since there are fewer newspapers, and since the newspapers that exist have uh fewer and fewer readers.
Chamber of Commerce CEO Tom Donahue is a wanted man, according to the liberal activist group that's put a de facto bounty on his head.
A network of liberal groups known as Velvet Revolution started an ad campaign offering 200,000 for information leading to the arrest and conviction of the man whose trade organization has become a thorn in the side of the Obama administration and Congressional Democrats.
The group is not leveling any specific charges of criminal behavior, rather, it's casting a wide net, fishing for any whistleblowers From Donahue's past, who might come forward with allegations of wrongdoing.
The Chamber of Commerce, meanwhile, decried the ad campaign threatened possible legal action.
The media should be following the money trail behind this scurrilous group instead of giving credence to its outrageous tactics.
And we are considering legal options with the ad, said the chamber spokesman.
The guy that runs this Velvet Revolution is a guy named Kevin Zeis.
And he's uh described on Wikipedia as an American political activist who's been a leader in the drug policy reform and peace movements and in efforts to ensure a voter-verified paper audit trail.
He was on the ballot as a nominee of the Maryland Green Party for a U.S. Senate seat during the uh 2006 election.
He got one and a half percent of the total vote, born in New York City in 1955, grew up in Queens, where he attended public scrual, his younger brother Kyle proved to be a huge influence.
He received a bachelor's degree from State University of New York at Buffalo and graduated from uh George Washington University Law School in 1980.
So it is a typical activist.
And uh casting a wide net for any damaging information on the head of the Chamber of Commerce.
Uh this is not your traditional Republican Party versus Democrat Party political period.
We now have the active attempt to dismantle the capitalist system and to cr.
And to criminalize those who are predominant in the free market to criminalize their behavior.
You you think he's uh budge with Valerie Jarrett?
Oh, you wonder if he's well, don't speculate like that and make me say it.
That's why you don't have a microphone.
We don't know that he knows Valerie Jarrett.
Now you just put it out there.
You made me say that he might know Valerie Jarrett.
We we we don't know that.
I thought you said he did know.
Now, we don't know that he knows Valerie Jarrett.
We don't know that he knows Jeremiah Wright.
We don't know that he knows Tiger Woods.
He could know all three to the audio sound bites, then Bernanke.
They're after him.
There's some people that want to take away some of his powers.
He was at the Economic Club in Washington yesterday.
He spoke.
And the uh president of the club, David Rubinstein, said, Do you expect the Fed will get all the money back that it has injected into the system in terms of loans to corporations?
Yes, I do.
I think we're in very good shape.
I think, in fact, certainly the actions we took were not for the perspective of profit maximization by any means, but in fact, I do believe we're going to get back all the money, and indeed we are going to be showing uh for the taxpayer a fairly significant uh extra income.
Not for long because Obama just announced today he's gonna spend it on infrastructure, roads, bridges, and schools, which there's still six hundred billion in the stimulus package that was earmarked for that that has not been spent on that.
This is great.
Dick Durbin.
Yesterday on Dr. Nancy on PMS NBC.
Dr. Nancy Snyderman said, Senator, when President Obama came by to see you on Sunday.
Did you hear from him what you wanted to hear?
The President, having served in the Senate, knows what it means when we give up a weekend and stay in session.
It's a sacrifice that we make and do it rarely, only on the most important circumstances, and this is one of them.
And the president more than anything stepped back and reminded us all why we do this for a living, why we've decided on public service and why we make these sacrifices.
What a croc.
This is what you you want sympathy from us.
You guys are up there destroying the United States private sector.
You want sympathy from the world.
How hard you're working.
Oh, it's oh.
It's such such a calling public service.
It's called Get Rich Quick Via Theft.
Good grief.
These people, they really do consider themselves royalty.
Obama didn't go up there and thank him for working on weekends.
He went up there and said, Reed, you go out and you can't you tell a Republicans they're acting no different than people did when they tried to maintain slavery.
That's what you tell them.
He reads it, this war is lost.
Okay.
I'll do it.
And he goes out there and does it.
We don't know that Harry Reed knows this Zee's guy either, nor do we know if Obama knows him.
We don't know if he's gotten into a state dinner or crashed a White House function.
Barbara Boxer on the Senate floor yesterday.
The men who have brought us this don't single out a procedure that's used by a man or a drug that is used by a man that involves his reproductive health care and say they have to get a special writer.
There's nothing in this amendment that says if a man someday wants to buy Viagra, for example, that his pharmaceutical coverage cannot cover it, that he has to buy a writer.
I wouldn't support that.
And they shouldn't support going after a woman using her own private funds for her reproductive health care.
Well, there's a big difference here.
Nobody dies when Viagra is prescribed.
Nobody dies when Viagra's used.
But every time an abortion takes place, somebody dies.
And by the way, what is this private funds for reproductive health care crap?
Abortion funding will be in whatever health care bill they're a big vote on it, supposedly is going to happen today.
They're not going to vote on it if they don't have the votes to make it pass.
They're not going to vote on it if they don't get that.
This is it'll be fascinating to watch.
Comparing Viagra to abortion in Obama case, well, Viagra is uh the the male equivalent of a woman's right to choose.
You know, I know I've played golf with a guy, a very old guy on set well, I didn't play golf.
I went out had lunch with some people Saturdays, guys.
He has to take a half of Viagra a day just to keep from urinating on his shoes.
All right, we're back.
Rush Limbaugh serving humanity and having more fun than a uh human being should be allowed to have.
Let's go to the phones.
People have been patiently waiting, Waynesboro, Virginia.
This Jennifer, great to have you here.
Hello.
Hi, Russ.
How are you?
Fine.
Thanks very much.
How are you?
I'm doing very well.
Just a little nervous.
It's an honor to speak with you.
Thanks very much.
Um I wanted to comment on the Senate Republicans and your comments yesterday.
I'm glad to hear Mitch McConnell saying that they they are gonna stand up against this and not just go along with it.
Uh the health care legislation that is.
But the thought that some of the Senate Republicans are seemingly going to go along with the the liberal notion of needing government involvement in health care infuriates me.
Uh, I saw Senator Gregg on TV last night talking about all the amendments the Republicans were going to introduce to improve this bill.
I don't think anything can improve this bill.
And uh I I don't know that that's where their efforts should be.
Um to preface my next comment, I have to say I am unabashedly pro-life and cannot believe what Barbara Boxer said.
Um but believe it, she said it.
Well, you look uh they are up there adding amendments.
There's no question they're adding amendments to it.
Uh and m McConnell's office did call here and say that that they're uh they are opposing this.
I don't know if adding amendments is a is a is a strategy to uh bollocks it up and slow it down.
But I I I I disagree with I the whole they just need to say no.
There's nothing wrong with saying no to this.
I agree.
That is the only thing to say about this.
I agree, and my question to you would be this pro uh pro-life amendment that they're they're considering today.
If this passes, is that the uh the uh the only hope of passing the health care legislation?
Because I'd rather this amendment go down if that means that the bill goes down.
I I don't want the same thing that happened in the house to happen in the Senate.
If that pro-life amendment hadn't been in there, the Congressman would not have voted for that bill, and we wouldn't be in the the state where we are now.
Yeah, that's it's that's very shrewd of you.
The Stupak amendment actually guaranteed passage in the House.
It did, and and and as as a pro-life woman who's had three children, and I I just I don't think if I was in that house that I would have been able to vote for that amendment, knowing what Nancy Pelosi intended that amendment for see, you're gonna get me in trouble with these people again.
I already got in trouble once because I I raked them over to Coles for being single issue people.
Well, I don't want to get you in trouble, certainly.
And I as I said, I'm unabashedly pro-life.
I think any woman who's had a child who's seen an ultrasound at twelve weeks, I don't see how they couldn't be pro-life.
Well, but look, you you and I, you and I are on the same page on that.
But you you not believing that, and I shared that sentiment with you.
But I have the same shock and dismay.
And people do not look at what Obama's doing.
I mean, essentially, we're aborting the private sector.
We're looking at a living breathing country on our own sonogram here.
And we're looking at Obama want to abort it.
It's the same thing to me.
And I uh you get flustered like we had Jeff Call.
I can't believe it.
Only 47% disapprove of the guy.
Ought to be hired now.
It will be.
Hang in there, be tough.
The question is, is it gonna matter?
These guys don't care.
Now Bomin is narcissistic thing, wants to be loved, but believe me, he surrounds himself with enough people that are sycophants that he thinks in his universe he's loved by everybody.
And he goes out and makes these speeches, and I'm sure they tell him, you know, what he wants to hear about it and so forth.
Look, I'm I'm glad you uh glad you called out there, Jennifer.
Thanks uh thanks very much.
Ladies and gentlemen, I uh I've got to remind you Zycam is it's on the store shelves, and it is waiting for you to pick some up.
This is the cold season.
Oh, and sp look at this.
Look ye here.
Swine flu, far less severe in latest calculations.
Hoax and change.
You mean to tell me after all of this, remember Kathleen Sabutius.
You must take the vaccine.
You must do the we've got a national pandemic on the way here.
You mean to tell me now that swine flu was not a national emergency?
Hoax and change, faulty data seems to be a theme these days.
Whether it's about jobs created or saved, whether it's about global warming, whether it's about Obamacare being deficit neutral or swine flu deaths.
President Obama seems to deal exclusively in lies.
The calculations represent a marked reduction from an August report by the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.
Well, hubba hubba, there's no swine flu problem.
So No swine flu.
Whoa.
But there still is the common cold, and it's out there and it's raging, and Zycam can arrest it if he catch it early enough.
Zycam comes in an orange box, many different forms and flavors.
It works.
Z-I-C-A-M orange box, just find it.
Folks, make sure you have it wherever you are, because for it to work, you must use it the first conscious moment you think you got it something wrong.
Uh sore throat, tickly throat, watery eyes.
Whatever the first sign of a cold is for you, that's when you start taking Zycam.
And you see if it doesn't shorten the duration and lessen the severity of the symptoms.
Now, another piece in the American thinker about Copenhagen.
Let me give you the summary before I read you some of the experts.
The climate treaty being negotiated in Copenhagen, this is the third side of this now, would have the United States and Europe surrender sovereignty, pay an annual global tax, and reparations to China, India, and Africa.
So that sounds like the original purpose of Copenhagen.
Put everything under the auspices of the UN.
We surrender our sovereignty on carbon emissions, which is surrendering sovereignty on economic growth.
We pay a global tax, reparations to China, India, and Africa because they are young and they have to keep emitting carbon.
They got growing economies.
We've already grown ours.
We can't stop them.
That would be unfair.
So we have to stop our growth, pay a tax, reparations, and the UN oversees all this.
Now, the competing, the the Danish texts say nope.
What's going to happen here is that the U.S. and Europe and Denmark are gonna s are gonna undermine all this, and they're gonna take control of all this away from the UN.
It is a mess.
But the American thinker piece says that climate treaty reparations would cost 50 to 200 billion dollars per year in taxes on the uh on the American people.
Barbara McCulski in Washington, D.C., Senator from Maryland on the Senate floor said this.
It's audio soundbite number eight.
Eight states consider domestic violence a preexisting condition, and you can't get insurance.
One woman who had a medically mandated C section was told she couldn't get insurance again unless she had a sterilization.
Coerced sterilization in the United States of America.
I thought that's what they did in Nazi Germany or in the old communist China.
Uh old communist China, I think they still do that, uh, essentially in uh in the ChICOM uh community.
Um she's comparing health insurers here to uh to Nazis.
All right, now she did that, right?
She she put it out there.
Do we all agree?
Now I, L. Rushbo, am going to respond.
Just as when Pelosi called us all Nazis during the tea parties, I responded, but they conveniently forgot that Pelosi started it.
So here's Mikulski.
And she has just said what the insurance company is doing is Nazis did.
Now she's talking about the Holocaust, right?
I'm not gonna talk about the Holocaust.
But Ms. McCulski, the Nazis did exactly what you were doing in health care.
They sought to nationalize it, put themselves in charge of it because they could regulate every citizen's life.
And isn't that what you and your Democrat colleagues are doing in not just the Senate, but the House as well?
So if you want to start making comparisons to the National Socialists, uh be careful where it may lead others.
Cool.
All right, have it uh have it standing by.
Uh we're back.
Uh Rush Limbaugh here at the EIB Network.
Uh, ladies and gentlemen, you know, uh we're back to Tiger Woods.
A woman has just sent me a column today by Eugene Robinson in the Washington Post.
Eugene Robinson is an African American.
He's a uh a regular uh panelist commentator over there at uh Mess NBC.
And this woman that sent me this friend has put some comments in various parts of the column written by Eugene Robinson.
The uh the title of the column is Tiger's Validation Complex.
And I'm just gonna read to you from about oh, halfway into the column on.
Here's my real question, though, writes Eugene Robinson.
What's with the whole Barbie thing?
No offense to anybody who actually looks like Barbie, writes Eugene Robinson, but it really is striking how much the women who've been linked to Tiger Woods resemble one another.
I'm talking about the long hair, the specific body type, even the facial features.
Hey, Eugene, you've been studying this.
Mattel could sue for trademark infringement.
This may be the most interesting aspect of the whole Tiger Woods story, and one of the most disappointing.
He seems to have been bent on proving to himself that he could have any woman he wanted.
But from the evidence, his aim wasn't variety, but some kind of validation.
I'm making a big assumption here that the attraction for Woods was mostly physical, but there's no evidence thus far that he had a lot of time for deep conversation.
Look, Eugene, the guy was not prowling the halls of Harvard, right?
He's in strip clubs, nightclubs, uh uh pancake houses.
Not to equate the pancake house with a strip club, but I mean he's not he's not out there prowling for brains.
If adultery is really about power and satisfaction of conquest, Wood's self-esteem was apparently only boosted by betting the kind of woman he thought other men lusted after.
And in the comment here, all men want other men to approve of who they make love to.
I have no clue.
Well, uh, I've I've been asked, what is he talking about?
And I I know what he's talking about here.
Look at what I I know exactly what Eugene Robinson's getting at here, but I'm not gonna if if you don't figure it out on your own, I'm not gonna be the one to say it.
They're still waiting out there for me to start talking about this, and I'm not gonna do it.
They are still waiting for me to bring this up so that they can then all talk about it while chastising me for doing it.
But I mean, if you have Eugene Robinson, they don't all look like Barbie.
A number of them do, but some of them don't.
Well, Barbie comes in every color, yes, but uh Eugene Robinson's not thinking uh in in diversity when he thinks Barbie here.
Let's put it that way.
Uh he then says the uh the world is full of beautiful women of all colors, shapes, and sizes, some with short hair or almond eyes, some with broad noses, some with yellow or brown skin.
Woods appears to have bought into an official standard of beauty that is so conventional as to be almost oppressive.
So I guess is Eugene Robinson saying that Tiger was a slave to a certain female type.
The Barbie.
Tiger is a slave to Barbie.
Is that what Eugene Robinson is saying here?
His taste in mistresses leaves the impression of a man who is deep down, both insecure and image conscious, a control freak, even when he's committing transgressions.
Now, do you have to know a little bit about that to write about it?
You get all these moralizers in the media.
Though they live lives clean and pure as the wind-driven snow.
Tip.
Well, that's the stuff.
Sterling, you're not gonna bait me.
You are not gonna bait me into discussing this.
Snerdley is screaming at me.
What's wrong?
What's the big deal?
A guy likes to have sex with a certain kind of woman.
What's so unique about I'm not going there.
You've got to put all of this in context to understand why this piece was written, Snerdley.
Next thing you know, they're gonna come out and say that Tiger may as well may as well just uh uh you know start an online backup process for mistresses, like like Carbonite.
That's what Eugene Robinson is saying here.
Even if you lose one, there's another one right down there at the strip club over at the Blue Martini.
If it if you lose that one, they're all backed up all over the place.
Barbies are backed up everywhere.
You go out to Las Vegas or go to a club in New York called Butter.
And wherever you go, you're gonna find same thing with Carbonite, folks.
You have a hard drive on your computer.
You have all your important stuff on there, but you only have one copy of it.
You don't have computers in the Blue Martini in Orlando.
You don't have computers at Butter in New York.
You don't have computers at all the night spots in Las Vegas.
You have one computer, maybe you have a satellite laptop, and you need to back up the data on it, because if you lose it, and you're going to, because all of us who have computers lose our data at one time or another.
Oh, it happens.
And if you if you if you're not backed up, um, it's gone.
You might be able to take it to a place that can restore some of the data on a hard drive, but that's that's a risk at best.
Just go to Carbonite.com, sign up, use the offer code Rush.
It's uh 55 bucks a year, but it's less than that because you get two free months and a 15-day free trial.
It backs up online, off-site.
You don't even know what's happening.
Happens every time you're connected to the internet.
Carbonite.com offer code rush, uh Mel in Griffith, Indiana.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Hello, Rush.
Hi.
Glad to talk to you.
And also I want to thank you for your efforts and try to open up the American eyes.
Thank you very much, sir.
Uh my question is uh what's currently that the banks are paying back the similarist package with interest to the feds.
Why aren't the feds paying off the trillions of dollars that we owe the Chinese with this money?
Uh you want to take a stab at answering that yourself?
Uh as to why they're not doing this?
Yeah.
I know why they're not doing this.
Well, then why did you call him to take care of?
Do what?
They have too many petty projects to take care of.
They are.
Uh I like I like Levin's words, statists.
This is this is uh I think further evidence that what's happening here is purposeful and is strategic.
He goes out there today and says we've got to reduce our deficit.
We're gonna do it, we're gonna do it by having health care.
Uh we're we had the greatest uh contraction to expansion in 30 years, while we still got 10% unemployment, we're gonna lower our deficits.
Well, he has busted.
He has bankrupted this country for decades.
Uh it it was a it was a sight to behold to watch this speech.
So here's this 200 billion dollars in unspent TARP money.
And by the way, TARP money is being paid back.
I want you to think about this.
When the TARP money was allocated, we were in a 24-hour emergency.
We had 24 hours to save the U.S. financial system and maybe the global financial system.
We had 24 hours.
We had to bum rush everybody into this boat.
And the Republicans didn't go along with it at first.
And it was a week or two delay, and the panic built and built and built.
The banks, we then learned were forced to take the money.
Even banks who didn't want to take the money, they were forced to.
That gave the government control over their operations.
Now the banks are paying it back, and we're told, hey, the economy doing so great the banks are paying it back.
The banks are paying it back because they don't want Obama running them.
But at the end of the day, at the end of this crisis, this emergency, this 24 hours away from disaster, we have 200 billion of it unspent.
Huh?
Say what?
What would the Reverend Wright say about that?
The white bankers of America are coming home to roost.
So now we have the 200 billion dollars unspent, and we're gonna do more job creation.
But we're not creating jobs.
We're losing jobs.
Somebody goes out and says we had a best jobs report in three years at 10% unemployment.
Does anybody remember it was mere years ago?
A few short years ago that we were at 4.5% unemployment.
Not that many years ago, two or three years ago.
And now we're at 10%, and we're talking about a great economy we've got.
This is on purpose.
He's not going to pay down any debt.
He's going to keep running debt up.
When you are in debt, you lose your freedom.
You lose liberty.
That's what this is all about.
Don't doubt me.
Something about this uh Eugene Robinson piece uh wish to point out, because earlier in the column, he says, I'm not gonna pronounce judgment on Tiger Wood's moral fiber, except to state that adultery is bad.
And I'm also not gonna judge the women who have reportedly had affairs with him, except to point out how quick they've been to retain high-price legal counsel.
Okay, so he's not gonna judge anything.
You're not gonna judge a thing.
And he says, here's my real question, though.
What's with the whole Barbie thing?
Is it not amazing?
Is it not amazing that to a columnist in the Washington Post, the big problem Eugene has with Tiger is his choice of concubine.
Stop and think about that.
His choice.
I'm not uh it's not good.
I don't pass moral judgment.
Uh women, but boy, what really bugs me is they all look like Barbie.
Folks, I know that all of this can make somebody just want to run, run, run, run away, like President Obama is doing in Afghanistan.
Not bad.
White comedian Paul Shanklin, who um does not particularly care for Barbies, and the vocal portrayal there as Barack Obama and Runaway.
Uh U.S. cancer rates continue their decline.
Fewer people getting cancer, death rates continue to fall, according to the latest report on cancer in the United States released yesterday.
New diagnoses for all types of cancer fell by almost 1% per year on average from 1999 to 2006, it's dropping about like the temperature is globally.
Uh Deaths fell 1.6% per year from 2001 to 2006, according to National Cancer Institute, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, of course.
Now remember, these are the same people who told us there's a swine flu epidemic.
My question here how is this happening?
How is this happening?
We've got the worst health care in the world.
It's unfair, it's unjust, it's immoral.
How in the world can this great news possibly be happening?
If the current state of our health delivery system is as in a shambles as President Obama says it is.
And we learned recently that if you're a woman and you want to get a mammogram every other year.
Now, men, it's your turn.
This is from Reuters.
The number of prostate cancers diagnosed in men each year would jump from 30,000 to 160,000 if the UK introduced population-wide screening for the disease, new research shows.
However, many of those cancers are low risk and may not lead to death.
Something similar happened in the U.S. in the mid-90s when giving men prostate-specific antigen, the PSA blood tests to detect the disease became a standard practice.
There was an epidemic of prostate cancer in America.
The number of cases virtually tripled in five years.
But they weren't that bad.
So now prostate cancer tests are going to be reduced, along with mammograms.
No more screening for men and women as the health care...
Before the whole thing has even been implemented, these changes are being suggested and made.
Quick time out.
We'll be back and wrap it up right after this.
Yesterday on CNN they interviewed the first day of Copenhagen, they interviewed the head of the University of East Anglia, the climate research unit, where the fake email, well, the hacked emails came out.
And he said this.
This is the head of the university, said this about climate gate.
I think it's very hard to be a denier.
And in some sense, you might say it's really up to the deniers to explain why it is when we're pumping so much greenhouse gas into the atmosphere, why it wouldn't have such an effect.
I mean, scientists tend to be a bit on the defensive, but in fact they shouldn't be defensive because the evidence is very strong.
You have no doubt.
I have no doubt.
Now, uh, this stands science on its head.
The people who evolve the theory are bound to prove it using the scientific method.
You cannot prove a negative.
So they advance a thesis, they can't prove it.
And they say the denials, I think mostly proof of not having an effect, because it's supposed to be supposed to be these arrogant, elitist little egghead snots.
▲
Export Selection