All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 2, 2009 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:40
December 2, 2009, Wednesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
I am Rush Limboy, and you are listening to the most listened to radio talk show in the country, meeting and surpassing all audience expectations with half my brain tied behind my back, just to make it fair.
Telephone number.
800-282-2882 and the email address L Rushbaugh at EIBNet.com.
A top Democrat lawmaker predicted on Wednesday that the government will be involved in shaping the future for struggling U.S. media organizations.
House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Nostralitis Waxman, saying that quality journalism was essential to U.S. democracy, said eventually government would have to help resolve the problems caused by a failing business model.
Are you people hearing me on this?
Waxman and other U.S. lawmakers and regulators are looking into various options to help the newspaper industry hurt by the shift in advertising revenues to online platforms.
Tweaks to the tax code to allow newspapers to spread losses over a greater number of years, providing a nonprofit structure to allow for public and foundation funding, and changes to antitrust laws are being considered by lawmakers and policymakers.
Waxman said that eventually government is going to have to be responsible to help and resolve these issues.
He said this to a conference hosted by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission on the Future of Journalism.
Free press, a public interest group, said the search for solutions to the crisis in journalism should be premised on the idea that news gathering is a public service, not a commodity.
Waxman's indication that government has a role to play is both bold and soberly sensible, said free press policy director Ben Scott on the sidelines of the FTC conference.
This throws everything upside down.
This puts everything on its head.
There is a reason the newspaper business is in trouble, and it's called content, content, content.
Thank you.
The question I have.
No, no.
I just somebody shouting in the IFB here.
What are they going to make us read it?
That's not the point, you see.
If being read were the point, they would change the content.
It's not the point to change the to make us read it.
There's no way they can do that.
The reason Waxman's getting involved is to make sure their liberal support group, the media, one of the four corners of deceit, doesn't go bankrupt.
They have to keep up their house organs.
This is all about propping them up to keep the Democrat message getting out.
The liberal left message.
It's obscene.
It's outrageous.
Unions threatened to darken Rockefeller Christmas tree lighting over negotiations with NBC.
Just as Thanksgiving has the Macy's Day Parade, so does Christmas in New York have its annual lighting of the Rockefeller Center Christmas Tree.
The event, scheduled for tonight, uh, is a time where celebrities gather and NBC grabs ratings with its Christmas and Rockefeller Center tree lighting special.
However, this year the threat looms large that there will be no lights, cameras, or action, as NBC remains stalled in negotiations with the local chapter of the National Association of Broadcast Employees and Techns, also known as NABIT.
The Union claims that since its contract with NBC expired in March, there has been very little progress in the talks, and uh management has grown increasingly hostile, ignoring the concerns of the union's membership.
Now that NABIT CWA, the communications workers of America, is threatening to strike during the Christmas tree lighting ceremony, unless network execs set dates for further negotiations.
They've also set up a website where parties can read the union's case against uh NBC.
First Charlie Brown gets canceled because of Obama.
Now this behind everything bad, behind everything sad is either a Democrat or a union.
Behind everything sad and everything bad is a Democrat andor a union.
Uh, let's see.
Did that story already?
You know, I've done half of these stories in the stack just off the top of my head.
Um climatologists are just in a sheer panic.
Uh and the the uh climate gate scandal stack continues to grow.
This is James Delling poll in the UK telegraph.
It's all unraveling now.
It's all unraveling now is the headline.
So many new developments.
Which story do we pick?
Maybe best to summarize instead.
After all, it's not like you're going to find much of this reported in the mainstream media.
Number one, Australia's Senate rejects emissions trading scheme for a second time.
Expect to see a lot more of this.
Politicians starting to become aware of their party's position on anthropogenic global warming is completely out of kilter with the public mood and economic reality.
Kevin Rood's emissions trading scheme, what Andrew Bolt calls a 114 billion dollar green tax on everything, would have wreaked havoc on the coal-dependent Australian economy.
And that's why several opposition liberal front benchers resigned rather than vote with the government on the uh on the tax scheme.
So cap and trade in Australia has failed for a second time.
Second story, Danes caught fiddling their carbon credits.
Carbot trading is the Emperor's new clause of international finance.
It was invented by none other than Ken Lay, whose Enron would currently be one of the prime beneficiaries in the global alternative energy market.
If it hadn't been shown to be nearly as fraudulent as the current global warming scam, it's a license to fleece, to cheat, and rob.
Still, jolly embarrassing for the Danes to get caught red-handed.
What would they're hosting a conference shortly in which the world's leaders will try straight faced to persuade us that carbon emissions trading is the only viable way of defeating man-made global warming.
Here's, you know, another way to look at this.
I just sent an email here uh pictures of Governor Schwarzenegger getting in and out of his Porsche Carrera, which is not exactly a Prius.
And uh the governor drives around in big SUVs and so forth, and he does have his own jet that he flies, I think, every week from Sacramento back down to Southern California where he lives, and might do it every day.
And they're gonna be all kinds of private jets uh you know flying over to Copenhagen.
Now, when all of these people start driving Prius and take uh steamships over to Copenhagen or whatever, or take the truth, then maybe I'll believe they mean it.
No, I never will believe they mean it.
I'm just making a point.
We know they've made it all up.
It is a pure unadulterated hoax.
And now Phil Jones, the head honcho at the East Anglia Climate Research Unit has stepped down amidst the controversy while an investigation ensues.
Uh what else do we have?
Climate change again.
UK telegraph climate change.
This is the worst scientific scandal of our generation.
Our hopelessly compromised scientific establishment cannot be allowed to get away with a climate gate whitewash, says Christopher Booker.
And there's more.
Listen, here's a here's a a short take from the uh from the story.
Uh shh, sh.
The second and most shocking revelation of the leaked documents is how they show the scientists trying to manipulate data through their tortuous computer programs, always to to point in only the one desired direction, to lower past temperatures and to adjust recent temperatures upwards in order to convey the impression of an accelerated warming.
This comes up so often, not least in the documents relating to the computer data, that it becomes the most disturbing single element of the entire story.
This is what Mr. McIntyre caught Dr. Hansen doing with his temperature record last year, after which Hansen was forced to revise his record.
And two further shocking examples have now come to light from Australia and New Zealand.
It's worldwide.
This scandal or this hoax is worldwide.
They would not they didn't even keep the original temperature data.
Nobody can see the baseline from which all of this was used.
It's it's uh or all this was created.
So it is a it's it's it's it's an ongoing scandal.
It's getting larger and larger and larger, and it is starting to unravel, but that doesn't mean uh that the greens are going uh anywhere.
Uh they've got stories out sea level rise will double due to melting of Antarctica.
Uh Lord Moncton is demanding prosecutions of all of these people at the uh at the Hadley uh climate research unit at East Anglia.
Uh it is unraveling, and it's going to be a very difficult thing for these people to uh continue this charade because as more and more attention is brought to bear on this, it's going to be more and more difficult for traditional media outlets to ignore it.
We'll be right back, folks.
Sit tight.
Hey, Snerdley, and the rest of you people out there, remember tomorrow is our own unemployment summit here on the EIB network.
Obama's holding his jobs summit at the White House tomorrow, where he has said that the objective is not job creation.
And yet we are going to do our own job summit tomorrow.
We are going to take calls only from people who are unemployed.
Now, I, El Rushbow, will be doing other items of news out there, but the phone calls tomorrow will be exclusively from those of you who are unemployed.
Now, you might be asking how are you going to control that?
We have our methods.
We do rely on the honor system.
And Snerdley's pretty good at identifying people that don't have jobs.
We have several test questions.
And uh we we we hope that the those of you who call uh will be open about your situation and uh explain what's happened, and more importantly, uh tell us what it is you think needs to happen in order for you to have a better chance of finding a job.
Because that's a that's what uh well no nobody's gonna get fired after the phone.
What do you what do you what do you mean?
Does it count if you get fired after the phone call?
If who loses their job?
What if they get laid off after they call?
What I mean, but because they call, is that what you're asking?
No, okay.
Well, uh it's a stupid question.
I don't understand the question.
Uh bottom line is we're going to be talking to all of you who are unemployed about your ideas, what we ought to be doing in order to create jobs.
Mm-hmm.
Yes, yes, I know it, Snerdley.
That's where I'm going next.
I know, we're not sitting around in my living room having conversation.
This is a radio show.
Now, here I have a dream.
I have a dream for tomorrow.
Wouldn't it be great?
Remember in Detroit, where all those people showed up for those forms to fill out to hopefully the application to get a piece of Obama stash.
They were going to pass out in Detroit.
What if, what if the jobless lined up in front of the White House for the jobs summit.
Wouldn't it be great if all the unemployed in the area got the idea that Obama was passing out jobs tomorrow and showed up for his job summit, thinking that it was interviews or applications.
Like the folks did in Detroit.
They thought money was going to be handed out from Obama's stash.
That's what they thought they were getting.
They were just getting forms to fill out to apply for the money.
Now, what Snerdley was telling me as though we're sitting around in the living room having a conversation, because he just learned it.
Critics have not been invited to the White House job summit.
Missing from a partial list of attendees released by the White House are the self-proclaimed voices of business.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Federation of Independent Business, both of which have been critical of Obama's proposed health care overcall.
Confirmed attendees include liberal economists credited with shaping the stimulus package, union leaders, environmentalist wackos, and executives from Google and other blue chip firms.
Peter Marie Chief Professor at the University of Maryland's Robert H. Smith School of Business.
He's going to get lots of recommendations to spend more money.
These are the very same people who gave us the stimulus package.
My feeling is we're not going to get what we need, and that's a complete change in direction on economic policy.
And this guy's exactly right.
This is another show.
Pure and simple.
It's another show.
It's designed to make people think Obama cares about him, is working on trying to get him a job, but it's not about that.
It's about it.
This is this is a strategy session between Obama and his buddies to create more slush funds.
But there may be trouble in paradise.
I'm holding here in my formerly nicotine-stained fingers.
A piece from the Wall Street Journal.
The rift over economic policy between the Obama administration and the Congressional Black Caucus appeared to widen today when a meeting between several lawmakers and White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel ended without an agreement, and the lawmakers refused to attend a morning committee vote to overhaul financial rules.
The group's effort to block a vote on the financial regulations could have derailed a major White House priority.
But Barney Frank, my boy Lollipop, Narrowly managed to pass the bill without the panel's ten Congressional Black Caucus members.
Barney said he spoke last night to Rahm Emanuel and Maxine Waters, who's been leading talks for the Congressional Black Caucus, and wasn't sure whether a deal could be worked out by Wednesday morning.
Apparently, what's going on here is the Congressional Black Caucus, in their infinite wisdom, actually thought that Obama meant he was going to be creating jobs with the stimulus money.
And of course, he's not.
There are no new jobs.
There's nothing happening other than destruction.
And the Congressional Black Caucus wants little action for their constituents.
If it's not going to be jobs, they want some money.
They know there's a big slush fund there, and they want some of it.
And so the rift is widening.
And Maxine Waters, it says, a Wall Street Journal story from about an hour ago.
Maxine Waters is holding an afternoon news conference about this today.
Our microphones, as always, will be there.
Have you heard about the uh the big shakeup in the White House, folks?
No, no, no, no, not on the president's staff.
The president uh General Motors.
The CEO of General Motors, which Obama's company, uh, another CEO's been canned.
He has.
Following the will of GM Board of Directors, uh, they dismiss the chief executive Frederick Fritz Henderson.
He's been there, what, ten months?
As of this moment, Obama has not fired any new executives at insurance companies, big pharma banks, or Wall Street firms.
Stay tuned for possible developments on that.
They said, the board said, and of course, this is Obama's company, that Fritz Henderson hadn't moved fast enough on progress.
There's there's nobody that knows how to run General Motors that's running it.
Fritz was uh Fritz was uh was a puppet out there.
A quick phone call, Larry in Turlock, California.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Great to have you here, sir.
Dittoes, tell us about that man.
That's how I'm how long I've been listening to you, right?
Oh my gosh, you're going way, way, way, way back.
I'm an American, I'm a Vietnam era veteran, and I'm a truth seeker.
My comment is on that dog and pony show I saw last night on TV.
I know one when I see one.
I think we found the weapons of mass destruction.
It's called politics of mass destruction, it's called media of mass destruction.
I witnessed that last night on my TV.
It brings me in mind George Washington is who the president should model himself after.
Lead the troops into battle, as George Washington did.
Stop killing my brothers and sisters in the U.S. military, and may you all live to fight another day.
Well, uh let me just add to this that in the three months that Obama has dithered in making his speech last night, one hundred and sixteen U.S. service men and women have been killed in Afghanistan.
While awaiting reinforcements that were asked for by their commanders, General McCrystal.
So that is why Larry here says stop killing my brothers and sisters of the U.S. military.
May you all live to uh fight another day.
Um weapons of mass destruction, you think it's the media?
I know it's the media.
They're killing us.
You cannot, you cannot tell your enemy your strategy, and then expect not to be getting your butt kicked.
Uh it's you know, Larry, it's it's not it's not just that.
Well, you know, we told him a strategy, but I I want to again I want to put this out there because this is chilling when you look at it this way.
Instead, imagine this.
Instead last night of of seeing our president on TV say what he said.
Imagine they were urged to watch a national address, a world address from the leader of the Taliban, Mala Omar.
And in his speech, Mala Omar says, We are going to train 30,000 new terrorists.
We are going to make them kill us, and if we are going to make them mean.
And then in two years, we are packing up and leaving for Pakistan.
Would we not be declaring victory over that?
Would we not be thinking Mullah Omar just surrendered?
He huffed and puffed, he's going to train 30,000 new terrorists, and then in two years, they're packing up for Pakistan.
We'd be throwing parties.
We'd be saying we won.
Well, what do you think they're doing wherever they are in their caves in Pakistan and Afghanistan after hearing the president essentially say the same thing last night?
You know, my friends, it just never fails.
Even after 21 years, it never fails I have earned and uh achieved and sustained the number one position in talk radio for 21 years.
And yet, people persist in sending me emails suggesting I'm not doing it right.
Rush, you're being distracted by this Afghan stuff.
What about health care?
What about health care?
What about health care.
Uh ladies and gentlemen, my eye is never off the ball.
Would you be interested in knowing that 15 what is it, 15 billion dollars in cuts for nursing homes are part of the health care bill.
That is the elderly, by the way.
I think it's fifteen.
It it might it might be 30, but certain 15 billion dollars in cuts for nursing homes.
That is that's not insignificant.
And see, the dirty little secret is we're not gonna need nursing homes if the seasoned citizens are not treated for diseases that would sustain their lives.
It's that simple.
But now our friends at the Heritage Foundation, they pay attention to this all day long, all week long.
I'm in constant contact with our good buddies at the Heritage Foundation.
They have scholars over there, they have researchers over there, and they're putting a laser-like focus on what's being said and proposed, and fear not, my friends.
You will know before anyone else does.
They'll make that information available to me, and they make it available to you.
It's at Askheritage.org.
Hundreds of thousands of you are members of the Great and Dynamic Heritage Foundation.
You already know what to expect, a vigilant eye that will expose all the details, and they'll also be working with uh conservatives in the Senate on innovative solutions that are real and patient-based, as everybody works together to try to stop this.
Now, this this kind of uh fight does not happen without the Heritage Foundation.
They are involved with Republicans on the Hill policy-wise.
And if if you're in the audience and as outraged as anyone over what's being attempted with health care, then one way to fight back is by staying informed and supporting the Heritage Foundation as a member so that they can continue uh their work.
All you do is go online to AskHeritage.org and just sift through the reams of user-friendly information on your way to becoming a member.
I mean, you get to see a lot of stuff before you join, just to see what's available to you.
The membership is growing every day, but only because people are making a commitment to preserving and fighting for genuine conservative ideals.
There's strength and good ideas, and there's growing numbers there, too.
So join the Heritage Foundation today at AskHeritage.org.
Tim in uh in Dayton, Ohio.
Great to have you with us, sir.
Hello.
Yes, thank you, sir.
Um I heard you mention earlier that uh Chris Matthews called the uh the West Point Academy there the enemy, and then you played the soundbite a little later on.
And uh first of all, let me say I do not agree that with his calling the that uh Academy the enemy.
That was a that was quite extreme.
Well, he said the enemy camp.
Yeah, exactly.
But I'm going to the enemy camp.
But uh but I but after you played the soundbite, uh I realized the context was was uh you know less than warm and friendly as far as the reception uh was and uh again not like an enemy, but it was uh it was not friendly like a good friend would be, and it but uh but again I disagree with it because the simple truth, it would be like uh um if if two people disagreed and one called the other Satan for disagreeing, that that'd be the extreme example of doing that.
But again, the context.
Wait a second.
Well, I'm not sure what you're saying.
Are you saying you understand why Matthew said it?
Well, I again I don't agree with it, but yes, I do understand it.
Okay, why did he say it?
He he said it to, I guess provide an extreme allegory to the to being being uh like an enemy in that it's it was not warm and friendly.
I mean, uh an enemy an enemy would not be warm and friendly to a person.
And and that was kind of his his extreme allegory.
And again, I do not agree with it because that would be like two people disagreeing and one calling the other Satan for disagreeing.
Well, but no, it's not like two people disagreeing.
Yeah.
You have the president of the United States, right?
Who is the commander in chief.
Uh-huh.
He's their boss, he's their inspirational motivational leader.
Well, by design, for a member of the vaunted United States state controlled media to suggest that we have a president that would consider a military academy, enemy territory.
Yeah.
What have we done to ourselves?
This is like saying, if you're a chicken farmer, hey, let's have Colonel Sanders over.
Uh I don't I I I do not there is no context here.
Uh this is this is outrageous.
It's outrageous that we have come to this that it it that it is understood that we got a president who, when he goes to the military academy, is treading in enemy territory.
Stop and think about that.
It'd be one thing if the president were going to go have a talk with the Taliban troops at whatever their training academy is, but he went to ours.
I can understand the president's going to enemy territory if he's going to go over to Afghanistan or Pakistan or whatever, but not to West Point.
Ha!
My best Howard Dean impersonation.
Let's uh you know, folks, that we we there's a lot of people on our side today trying to sound reasonable.
A lot of people on our side uh the conservative side saying we must support our president in this.
We must not be uh partisan on this issue, and this is national defense and national security.
We must get behind our president on this.
No, because our president gave his left wing base the policy victory here.
The president just surrendered.
Send 30,000 troops to Afghanistan for what did he spell it out?
I didn't hear it.
Now, if there's a plan, he should.
You know, you don't have to give away the the the playbook here, but you can say what the objectives are to rally the troops.
We're not gonna let them take the cities.
It's all you have to say.
These troops are going to protect the cities, we're gonna make sure the Taliban does not retake that country and get a stranglehold on it and enable Al Qaeda to come back in.
We're gonna not give up control of the cities, and that's what we intend to do.
Motivation, inspiration, rally, none of that.
Oh, but the set of troops over there, um bringing them home.
Just in time for my campaign.
Again I ask you.
We're watching TV last night, and instead of Obama preempting Snoopy, it's Mullah Omar.
And Mola Mullah Omar's got one bad eye, one good eye.
And Mo and he stutters.
Even when he has a teleprompter.
When he's sitting there and he's reading the Al Jazeera teleprompter, he's standing in front of whatever machine gun backdrop that they stand in front of over there.
And he says, You do not scare us.
We kill you.
We continue to kill you.
We are going to train 30,000 new tenants from Allah.
We are going to Hellahu Akbar to you.
And then in two years, we are leaving.
We are going to Pakistan.
We are leaving you, the country.
We hate you.
What will we be?
We're laughing at the guy.
So you you have to imagine Mola Omar and the boys sitting there watching Barack Obama say the same thing.
While he admits that we've made some mistakes and essentially says, hey, look, these guys have a point.
You know, we we have uh made some mistakes here as a country.
I I know that uh militant Islamists do not drink.
But that speech last night could have made him break out the champagne.
As a first, folks.
I mean, that's how bad it was.
Ha, how are you?
Welcome back, Rush Limbaugh here on the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
All right, the Tiger Woods update.
This is from the Chicago Sun Times.
The con the continuing revelations of alleged Tiger Woods infidelities has placed the golfing megastar's management team in what one insider called panic mode early this morning.
Despite the release of photographs of Woods looking a bit too friendly with a woman in a Las Vegas nightclub, and a recording allegedly of a phone call Woods made to former Tool Academy reality uh show star Jamie Grubbs, the Woods source insists that Tiger still believes the stonewalling the press on this is the best approach.
Also, don't look for Woods' wife Ellen to be moving out of the couple's mansion any time soon.
Tiger's spouse is reportedly being paid a hefty seven-figure amount, immediately transferred into an account she alone controls to stick with her husband.
On top of that, my source indicated that Ellen Nordrigren Woods, the mother of Tiger's two children, has demanded and is getting a total rewrite of the prenup, making the incentives for her to remain Mrs. Tiger Woods even more enticing.
At this point, the couple needed to remain married for ten years in order for Woods' wife to collect a splitzville settlement of twenty mil.
I'm being told that time frame has been shortened and the dollar amount increased substantially.
By the way, the author here is a guy named Bill Zweeker, and it is uh Chicago Sun Times, perhaps most important of all, the Woodses have already begun intense marriage counseling at their home with a counselor who has been conducting sessions several times daily.
Look at I'm I'm passing no j by the way, this poor di can we say Obama failed to save a job.
What were the uh GEC uh GMCEO being camped?
Yeah, he didn't save a job there, did he?
So now I don't even know whether this is true.
It's Chicago Sun Times.
I don't even but it's out there.
He's paying her off seven figures for those of you in Rio Linda.
I mean, we're talking millions here.
A rewrite of the prenup.
Uh, marriage counseling.
Uh, marriage counseling.
You know, snurdly, I have to be honest with you.
Back at the at the break of the top of the hour, I'm back in Snurley's office.
And Snerdley has since this whole thing broke, he has not understood it.
He doesn't understand why but he's surprised.
What do you have here?
He says, You have a rich, good looking star athlete?
Having an affair, too?
This is news.
What's the big deal about this?
Snurdley said his grandmother told him once.
If there's a man involved, you can guarantee this is going to be happening.
That's what your grandmother told you.
All right.
So here is what I told Snerdley.
Snow, it's something you're not getting here.
The reason why this is such a big deal is that the image that everybody has of Tiger Woods is not just Mr. Perfect, but here is great looking guy.
A beautiful woman for a wife.
Hundreds of millions of dollars does not have to do one thing he doesn't want to do.
Everybody thought that Tiger Woods was the epitome of what everybody's trying to reach, and that is universal happiness.
And now people are stunned to learn that with all that he has and all that he's achieved, he was miserable at home.
And that's that's what my God's n people think if I had that money, and if I had all he's got, if I had played off that way, and and and I was married to his wife, that's what people think.
So when this gets and it's not just it's not just uh it's not just one, and then it these details, whether they're true or not, all these phone sex messages, all these texts, and so forth.
It's a side of Tiger Woods nobody thought existed.
Remember, this guy was Mr. Perfect.
This was Mr. Clean and Pure as the wind driven snow, as far as everybody was concerned.
He's not the typical good looking rich athlete, I guess is the point, Snurdley.
And Snerdley had to admit, yeah, I should have consulted you first before uh generalizing about this.
Because you always have a perspective that I never consider, and that's true.
To the phones we go to Robin in Aspen, Colorado.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Mr. Limbaugh.
Hello.
Hi.
Hi.
Um I I I kind of wanted to say, you know, I hope the Raiders went over the Steelers.
It'd be great if uh the Steelers did go home after the first half.
That would be tremendous for us.
But uh you're a Raiders fan?
Yeah, unfortunately.
Oh man.
Huh.
It's not easy, but I'm a loyal Raiders fan.
Pardon me.
Um I I also just wanted to say real quick, if you just give me one second, um what a tremendous thing it has been for me.
Um and my growth into manhood to have you as a teacher and an example.
And uh I wanted to tell you that I really appreciate you and everything that you do, because uh there was uh time in my life when I didn't know exactly what direction was best, and I started listening to you, and it put everything into the right perspective for me, and it helped me to attain moral clarity.
And uh thank you so much.
Well, I appreciate that.
I really do.
It's all well and good, but I wouldn't call myself a total success.
No.
I mean, if you're still a Raiders fan.
Well, you know, I'm not perfect.
I'm striving.
Well, that's what's what Tiger's saying he's not perfect.
Look, let me give you some hope here.
If the Pittsburgh Steelers can lose to the Kansas City Chiefs, they can lose to the Oakland Raiders.
I feel slightly better.
I don't think it's going to happen.
Uh they're gonna get Rothlisberger back.
And the coach, Mike Tomlin, said after the game, after they lost to Baltimore late Sunday night, said we are going to unleash hell in December.
That's from the movie Gladiator, which is one of his favorite movies.
You've watched it night before the game.
It's unlikely that they're gonna lose to the Raiders, but it uh if they lose to the Chiefs, I mean the Chiefs, the Raiders have beat the Chiefs.
Yeah, that was a fluke, though.
Well, what do you think?
Yeah, I have to give you that.
You got at least you have your team in respect.
Robin, thanks for the call.
I'm out of busy broadcast moments here because we have to go to a hard break, but thanks much.
I appreciate it.
We'll be right back.
Okay, now remember, folks, tomorrow is our own jobs summit, our own unemployment summit when we go to the phones on the Rush Limbaugh program tomorrow.
LA Times headline today.
Barbara Aaron Rico, a well-known feminist, I didn't get a chance to get to this.
We need a new women's health movement.
The uproar over mammogram guidelines shows how the feminist movement has strayed.
I'll have the details of this for you tomorrow as we incorporate regular uh happening news.
At the uh at the same time, we take our phone calls from you, the unemployed, to hear what you think about what needs to be done.
▲
Export Selection