All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 28, 2009 - Rush Limbaugh Program
34:37
October 28, 2009, Wednesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The views expressed by the host on the show, documented to be almost always right, 99.3% of the time, I am your host, Rush Limboy, a highly trained broadcast specialist, meeting and surpassing all audience expectations on a daily basis.
Telephone number if you want to be on the program is 800-282-2882.
So we've had a number of uh calls today.
People have not gone on the air, drive-by called saying uh, you know, this uh swine flu, I think the cases are being hyped.
What's happening is that people come down with what they think is the flu.
I mean, when you put out the news that there's gonna be a pandemic of this stuff, and then you get a sore throat, you know, a cold and a flu are totally different things.
I mean, they're both viral, but much different things.
If you but you can't take a chance.
People are gonna die, Mr. Limbo, they're going to die.
We've got to get the vaccine.
It's horrible out there.
So people come down with a cold symptom, go to the doctor, go to a testing center, and they've been told that, yeah, you've got the swine flu, or you some kind of flu, we don't have time to test you.
People are being told to test expensive.
So here, take this medicine, some antibiotics or whatever, not even the vaccine, which doesn't work on a virus anyway.
Uh, antibiotics work on infections, but they don't work on a virus.
They're dispensing this stuff, and they're reporting swine flu cases.
And some people are beginning to think that the number of cases is being hyped here simply because the number of frightened people showing up with flu or cold-like symptoms.
Uh I know of a woman whose daughter is at college.
And the daughter came down with uh something she thought was a flu because all this news about it, so she went to a testing center they had on the campus.
And the medical people there gave her antibiotics, did not test her.
She was told that the test for swine flu is pretty expensive, they can't do it for everybody, but takes a while and so forth.
You can die before we find out.
So no, they're not told that.
But I mean, that's what people think.
They're being led to believe they're gonna get they're gonna die if they get the virus.
If they get this flu, they think they're gonna die.
That's what's that's what this is all created.
So the bottom line is the medical people then report swine flu case.
Now, this is being, if if this is true, and it's happening all over the place, then a number of cases is being hyped.
And I don't doubt that it is.
I don't doubt that the number of H1N1 cases out there is being hyped.
And for many of the same reasons that AIDS was and still is hyped in uh in Africa.
Everything in Africa is called AIDS.
The reason is they get AIDS money for it.
AIDS is the biggest pile of a pot that people throw donation money into.
I mean, you if you if you pay attention, you know, if you listen to any news reports, that the number of AIDS cases in Africa is over the top, and it's not going down, and it's spreading to all population levels, is it's horrible over there.
And so Bush sent 15 million in AIDS, all the Clinton Global Initiative sending money to AIDS.
Well, to keep that money coming in, what do you need?
You need AIDS cases.
Even if you don't have them, you report that you do.
So everything is AIDS, you get the money.
If in this in the same circumstance here, if you're gonna get federal money, if there's a giant pile of it for H1N1, all you gotta do is report, yeah, here's a case of it.
Here's again by the by the end of the day, uh, this many new cases reported, bam, here comes the money.
Everything is a scam, or everything has a scam aspect to it.
Which, see, I have a general distrust of government folks, and this is why when Kathleen Sabilia says you must get the vaccine.
I say, no, ma'am.
I have three times the IQ of you do.
I am much more informed, educated, and smart than you are.
Plus, you're from the government, and you work for Obama, and you've got an agenda behind this.
You're really not that concerned about people's health.
You're concerned about pushing an agenda, and your job in pushing the agenda is helping create panic.
And then being able to control people.
I'm sorry, I am not going to be controlled.
I'm not gonna be a member of the herd.
But a lot of people are not that way.
It's uh I am.
So that's that's but I'm just Fox.
I mean, I'm 58 years old.
I have lots of experience with government.
I s I studied it.
I mean, it's my job.
I know what a dismal failure it is every time it ties to solve a problem.
There are some success stories.
There's no question some great government programs.
I think NASA in the early days was slam bam.
NASA was just.
And even now, and I say that to some people say, ah, you, you, you, you fell for the PR hype.
NASA's a bottom pit, just like everybody.
But NASA in the early days was great stuff.
Um, and there are a couple of examples, but over when they start engineering social policy, it's a it's a disaster.
It's a debacle.
They bust up and break up families.
So I don't, I don't.
They they tell me that there's a swine flu uh epidemic, I'm not gonna believe it.
What I'm gonna do, I'm gonna go get a chart, and I'm gonna go find real epidemics in the past.
We had what was the night, let me let me real quick here look at something.
Um I know it was uh what was the big flu in 1918?
Uh I'm sorry to waste your time trying to find this stuff.
I have so much, let's see, Spanish flu, 1918 to 1919, there were 20 to 100 million deaths worldwide.
Now that's an epidemic.
Now we're nowhere near that.
Uh the Asian flu, 1956 to 58, 2 million deaths worldwide.
The Hong Kong flu, 6869, one million.
The seasonal flu every year, mainly uh H3N2, um H1N1, 250 to 500,000 every year.
Seasonal flu, 250 to 500,000 people worldwide die from it.
That is the the case fatality rate is 0.1%.
The seasonal flu worldwide, and I don't see any evidence that we're anywhere near way over that average.
What's different about this flu is that normally it's it's the elderly who succumb to it.
This is getting children.
And of course, when that happens, you know, people's hearts melt.
It's the children, and they're but what, a hundred cases of uh that they're saying child death from this.
That's that's very, very sad, but it's not epidemic.
And yet, this administration is running around trying to hype it, and now they've got this vaccine and got people lined up, can't get the vaccine, all because they've created this, and I guarantee you this is what they want.
So Sibelius have to go out there today, and we need a reset on the program here.
That's not a reset, it's a mulligan.
It's a do-over.
So I wish if there are one thing I could bequeath to every American, it would be my knowledge and thus natural suspicion of people in power in government.
If you are a person who has an instinctive distrust for anybody in business, if they are, you think that they're out to screw you, be it at the auto dealer, be it when you uh go buy a house, you think your real estate agent is on the side of the seller when you're the buyer, I mean, we are people go through these things.
You think you're being shafted uh by the power company.
Please triple that when somebody from the government comes calling.
Because the people really shafting us, and it's not just people specifically, it's just the institutions, the bureaucracies.
They are destroying freedom day by day.
They are assuming you are an idiot, they look at you with contempt.
You don't even know how to cough right now.
They have to give demonstrations how to cough on your sleeve, which means that somebody in government has a take in the dry cleaning business.
Or the washing machine business or some such thing.
But if you have a natural distrust of people in business, and we know you do because the government, guess who it is?
The Democrat government has pounded big oil, big pharmaceutical, big food, big whoever.
Walmart, they want you to hate Walmart.
They're just jealous Walmart does more for you than government does.
For all of you who think that wherever you go in business, the bank, the automobile dealer, uh the credit card companies, do you think they're out to shaft you and cheat you?
I'm not going to try to talk you out of it.
I just want you to be an equal opportunity blamer.
And start looking at people in government the same way.
Because the evidence is clear that the real shafting starts there.
We'll be back.
Stay with us.
Now, according to the European CDC, Centers for Disease Control, I think, if we can trust them, I mean it's another government bunch, but according to them, worldwide deaths, as of this date, the swine flu, 5,938.
Now I know now that see, I some people think that the cases aren't being hyped.
Uh that's neither here nor there.
There is hype going on.
The White House is encouraging all of this crisis mentality.
The state-controlled media is doing its job in keeping everybody on edge about it, showing us pictures of long lines, people can't get vaccines in Chicago.
Apparently, there are death panels in Chicago.
Somebody's deciding who gets a vaccine there and who doesn't.
Palatine is the only Cook County suburb to get the swine flu vaccine.
And there's a newspaper story here asking, is this fair?
So somebody's deciding who gets it and who doesn't.
We had that call from Chicago saying his uh his kid couldn't get it because they weren't African American or Native American or some uh some other minority.
But there's no qu look at television itself is gonna hype all this because they think it's ratings.
And whether the number of cases being hyped, I I think the bottom line is I don't think they know.
I don't think they have the slightest clue who has this flu and who doesn't have it.
And I don't think they have the slightest clue who got the flu and got over it and doesn't have it.
They are also telling us that there are a lot of people.
Get this if you can believe this, there are a lot of people who um got the flu, were given a vaccine, and now what or or no?
How does this go?
People think they got vaccinated, didn't are susceptible uh the people carrying the flu it's all about the if you get it, you're immune from getting it again.
That's the point.
That's how the vaccine works in a way.
Uh, and they're worried that some people are are susceptible to getting the disease, thinking that they're now immune to it when they're not.
So, you know, what I'm I'm waiting for how many worldwide deaths have there been from hemorrhoids uh compared to uh the number of deaths from swine flu.
For example.
Nobody talks about hemorrhoid sufferers because it's too personal, and it's just too yicky.
But I wonder if they keep the numbers on hemorrhoid deaths.
I bet it's about the same as people who have died from the swine flu.
All right, New York Times today is trying to screw Afghanistan, much as the Kennedy administration attempted to screw South Vietnam.
Let me explain this.
New York Times story today, brother of Afghan leaders said to be on CIA payroll, Ahmed Wali Karzai, the brother of the Afghan president, and a suspect suspected player in the country's booming illegal opium trade, gets regular payments from the CIA,
and has for much of the past eight years, according according to current and former American officials, the uh agency pays Mr. Karzai for a variety of services, including helping to recruit an Afghan paramilitary force that operates at the CIA's direction in and around Kandahar,
which is Mr. Karzai's home, the financial ties and close working relationship between the CIA and Mr. Karzai raise significant questions about America's war strategy, which is currently under review at the White House.
More broadly, some American officials argue the reliance on Ahmed Wally Karzai, the most powerful figure in the large area of southern Afghanistan where the Taliban is strongest, undermines the American push to develop an effective central government.
Now, this it is very clear that the New York Times, somebody, probably it's gotta, this has got to come from the White House.
The Obama administration is trying to make sure that Karzai loses this runoff election.
You know, we got rid of Musharraf.
This bunch took care of getting Musharraf out of Pakistan.
Look what's hell going on in Pakistan's collapsing.
Have to get rid of Musharraf.
Now they want to get rid of Karzai by saying his brothers on the CIA.
Payroll.
But there are two brothers of Hamid Karzai, Ahmed and Mahmood.
And they have both spoken to uh Gerald Posner, who writes for the Daily Beast, and they have denied everything.
There is no way they say that uh we're not being paid to the CIA.
This is totally made up.
So they are vociferously denying it.
And this, I'll tell you, folks, this has it has a uh distinct similarity to what the Democrat administration back in the days did to South Vietnam's DM.
Now, I'm sure a lot of you do not know this, and those of you who do may not remember it.
On orders from U.S. President John F. Kennedy, Henry Cabot Lodge, the American ambassador to South Vietnam, refused to meet with DM.
Upon hearing that a coup d'etat was being designed by ARVN generals led by General Durong Van Minh, the U.S. gave secret assurances to the generals that the U.S. would not interfere.
Van Minh and his co-conspirators overthrew the DM government on November 1st, 1963.
It was swift.
Only one, the only the Palace Guard remaining to defend President DM and his younger brother.
The generals called the palace offering DM safe exile out of the country if he surrendered.
However, DM and his entourage escaped via an underground passage, where they were captured the following morning.
They were executed in the back of an armored personnel carrier by Captain Nuian or Win Van Hung uh while en route to the Vietnamese joint general.
Now, the point here, uh when when Ho Chi Minh learned of Diem's ouster and death, he is reported to have said, I can scarcely believe the Americans would be so stupid.
The North Vietnamese Politburo was more explicit.
They predicted the consequences of the November 1st coup will be contrary to the calculations of the U.S. imperialists.
Diem was one of the strongest individuals resisting the people in communism.
Everything that could be done in an attempt to crush the revolution was carried out by Diem.
Now, after Diem's assassination, which we stood by and let happen, because we thought we'd be better off with another guy in there.
South Vietnam was unable to establish a stable government.
Numerous coups took place during the first several years after Diem's death.
The U.S. continued to influence South Vietnam's government, but the assassination bolstered North Vietnamese attempts to characterize the South Vietnamese as supporters of colonialism, and it it went a long way toward harming the South's efforts to get the people in the South on their side.
The whole debacle.
We're going to throw Afghanistan under the bus.
For some reason, Karzai is not liked by probably because he's Bush's guy.
We put together a little tune here, ladies and gentlemen.
Afghanistan plan, playing off rubber band by the spinners, it's by Barack Obama.
Dithering.
American soldiers dying.
Barack Obama worried about his agenda.
Boy, this story is all over the place.
Ex-Letterman writer calls his show, the workplace there, hostile.
Pervasive sexually charged workplace, a liberal woman writing in Vanity Fair.
Many liberal women unhappy because liberal men treat them like dirt.
That's the essence of this story.
And we're back.
And there is this story in the New York Times.
It's all over the press.
Ex-Letterman writer calls workplace hostile, a former writer for David Letterman, said she quit his NBC talk show in part because of alleged sexual favoritism and a hostile work environment.
Nell Scovell, writing for Vanity Fair Online today, actually yesterday said that she had no intention of filing a lawsuit.
She wasn't seeking revenge.
I want to shine a light on the gender inequality in that particular workplace.
She said, in the Vanity Fair article, Scovell said that Letterman didn't hit on her during her five-month stint with the late night with David Letterman in 1990.
Did he pay me enough extra attention?
It was noted by another staffer.
Yeah.
Was I aware of rumors that Dave was having sex with female staffers?
Yeah.
Other high-level male employees were having sexual relationships with female staffers as well, and the women gained professional benefits from those relationships.
That make me feel demeaned completely.
Did I say anything at the time?
Sadly, no.
She wrote that she doesn't intend to seek legal action.
Instead, she said she wants to call attention to the complete lack of women writers on all talk shows.
Whether hosted by Letterman or Leno or Conan O'Brien.
She's got the in the Vanity Fair piece, listen to this.
She has this one passage.
She thinks the guys, the male writers, just don't want women around.
Because they are afraid the women will change them.
They want to be able to sit in there and eat bags of potato chips and burp and expel gas and do all that and make fart jokes without the women giving them a bunch of garbage.
And she writes, we are not their wives.
We are fellow writers.
If they do a funny fart joke, then we'll laugh at it.
So what do you have here?
When you break it all down, you've got a bunch of liberal men who are sexually abusing, or they are got a casting couch, or whatever, or they are denying opportunities.
These are liberal women who want to work in a liberal male atmosphere.
And when you boil it all down, liberal women are unhappy because liberal men treat them like dirt.
If you read this whole Vanity Fair piece, this woman is basically hurt that she cannot get a writing gig.
And that she knows that Letterman was out screwing whoever would screw him if they were getting benefits.
This even back at the NBC job.
Well, we all know Letterman is uh Letterman is a full-fledged card-carrying liberal.
Now we I've always thought that liberal men, Alan Aldell, they were understate.
You want an abortion?
Here, go get two.
Um you want uh you you you want to lead me around on a leash?
Here it is.
Put it on my neck.
Whatever.
Women this, women that, uh equal rights, equal opportunity, equal rights amendment, all this.
Put them in a liberal man's workplace, and they are treated like dirt.
Hell, they can't even get jobs in these places very much, and when they do, then they get all upset.
Mm-hmm.
No, no, no, no.
Sturdly is it wouldn't, wouldn't those women go in there and try to change the guy?
That's not the point.
The point is she thinks the guys will react that way.
She thinks the guy, the guy, she thinks that the guys are afraid that the women writers in the room when they're cranking out this stuff, are gonna be, you can't say that.
You shouldn't do that.
Just and it's very interesting that she said, We're not your wives, we are your collaborators.
Now that to me, here is a woman saying, No, we're not gonna treat you as though you were our husbands.
Whoa.
But point is it's an entire liberal atmosphere.
Liberal men treating liberal women like dirt, making liberal women unhappy.
And so much so the Huffington Post has this whole section now on why women are not happy.
And it's only liberal women that are unhappy.
They're running it.
They're miserable.
Well, that's the dirty little secret is when have liberal women been happy.
Liberal women, but liberal liberals, period, by definition, can't be happy.
It's It's part of the uh part of the ideology.
Um look, I want to combine a couple of things here.
Heritage Foundation.
Give you a perfect example of the Heritage Foundation's place in keeping track of the news.
Last week, Senate Democrat leaders brought a bill to the floor for debate.
It's been called the dock fix bill because if it passed, it would uh change the way doctors get paid by Medicare.
Now the Heritage Foundation people paid close attention to this because it just smelled like a classic case of unaccounted government spending.
Now, this bill gets looked at every year, but this year it was put on the floor early so that once passed, the doctors, the AMA, and a whole lot of special interest groups would support Obamacare.
Dingy Harry went so far as to say he was assured by the AMA that they could bring two dozen Republicans along to vote on the bill.
Except there was a problem.
When it was time for the first procedural vote, every Republican voted against it, as did 16 Democrats.
And the bill went down in a flame.
It did not pass, and it did not because there wasn't even a plan to pay for it.
Not that that's ever stopped Liberal Democrats before, but this time the Republicans did not sign on to it.
Now, when you are a member of the Heritage Foundation, you not only get the full story on details like this, you get a sense of pride, knowing that your organization is fighting against runaway spending in our nation's capital every day.
And look, you may you may look at what they're doing in the administration, and it's not working, it's not working.
They're trying.
There's a revolt coming.
The 2010 elections.
Just go to Askheritage.org.
You can sign up, become a member as I have, and help these smart people dedicated to smaller government, more freedom and liberty.
Ask heritage.org.
So let's go to the audio soundbites.
Dingy Harry.
He had a meltdown at his press conference yesterday.
Remember, his problem is Democrats.
He's got Democrats abandoning him on this public option state opt-out B.S. Yet listen to him whine and moan here about Republicans.
I seek, desire, do everything that I have within my power to get the Republicans to work with us.
This is a new world we found.
When I came here, we had Republicans and Democrats work together.
But you can't uh dance if your partner is unwilling to get off the chair.
It's like when I was in high school.
I wanted to dance, but she wouldn't get up.
Well, so what's changed?
What's changed, Dingy Harry?
If she wouldn't get off the dance with you and dance with you in high school, and nobody will dance with you now.
What's changed?
It seems like you're the problem.
But his problem is not Republicans.
Pelosi's got the same problem over in the House.
She can't keep her coalition to get her over there.
She's way short, according to the whip count now.
By the way, Obama is a big signing ceremony now for the defense bill, the 2010 defense authorization bill.
And do you know what is in this bill?
The defense spending bill, defense authorization.
There are a number of provisions defining hate crimes and punishments for them.
In the defense spending bill.
This is how the statists work.
Now, here's another portion of Dingy Harry after he learned that Joe Lieberman bailed on him.
I have the greatest confidence in Joe Lieberman's ability as a legislator.
And he will work with us when this gets on the floor, and I'm sure he'll have some interesting things to do in the way of amendments.
But Joel Lieberman is the least of Harry Reed's problems.
See, Dingy Harry thinks Lieberman wants to deal.
Lieberman has back, and he may be right.
He's a great guy.
He's a great American, but you gotta.
He's still at the end of the day as a Democrat.
And he said he wants no part of a public option, state opt-out, or whatever's called, he pulled out, he said he'll join the filibuster against.
Now, Dingy Harry thinks, ah, he just playing a game here.
He's a great legislator.
He wants something from me.
If I give it to him, he'll come and join.
That's what Dingy Harry's going on.
Here's what Lieberman himself said, uh, despite all that.
If at the end it it's not what I think is good for our country and most people uh living in our country, then I'll vote uh against cloture.
I'll join a filibuster and I'll try to stop the bill from passing.
Yeah.
Uh that i if now, if he means that none of this is any good for the American people.
None of it is.
He should oppose all of it.
The state-run media unloaded on the Lieberman.
We have audio soundbite number 14, a montage.
The uh ex-Democrat Joe Lieberman throws a monkey wrench into his former party's health care plan.
The final betrayal.
Joe Lieberman sells out to the insurance companies that own the state of Connecticut.
Senator Joe Lieberman, once again taking on his former Democratic colleagues.
The president's health care overhaul hit another snag.
Connecticut's Joe Eberman saying he opposes the bell.
Lieberman pledges to be a one-man wrecking ball against health reform.
Does Joe Lieberman want to see President Obama fail?
He's not a Democrat.
He represents the insurance industry of Hartford, Connecticut.
There's the state controlled media dumping on Lieberman.
Now remember, it was the Democrat Party who dumped on Lieberman and ran an independent against him in uh in Connecticut, owned, of course, by the insurance agencies.
Owned uh owned by the uh the uh insurance companies uh and their two percent profits.
Brief time out back after this.
Obama was uh somewhere here in Florida yesterday, uh Miami, I think, uh, talking about this new electrical grid that he's gonna have out there, uh, and that they will put smart meters, thermostats in our in our houses so that the government can turn off our power at peak times and uh and make us run our dishwashers when they think best.
Now, really, they said they're gonna make the dishwashers run like three o'clock in the morning when there's less peak.
And uh, of course, that you know, family catered dog is gonna go bonkers when that happens, and barking around, not expecting to hear that sound.
Most people want to get the dishes done and put away before they go to bed.
They don't have to face emptying the dishwasher when those who don't have staff don't want to have to worry about emptying the dishwasher in the morning.
They got too many other things to do, but despite that, smart meters and they're gonna tell you when you can and can't use your dishwasher.
But if electricity is so scarce, why is the government funding electric cars?
Somebody explain this to me.
All right, Ronald Reagan, 1964.
This is the 45th anniversary of his Rendezvous with Destiny speech for Barry Goldwater.
It's the same battle we face today.
Will we preserve the land that the rest of the world escapes to to be free?
I think it's time we ask ourselves if we still know the freedoms that were intended for us by the founding fathers.
Not too long ago, two friends of mine were talking to a Cuban refugee, a businessman who had escaped from Castro.
And in the midst of his story, one of my friends turned to the other and said, We don't know how lucky we are.
And the Cuban stopped and said, How lucky you are.
I had some place to escape to.
And in that sentence, he told us the entire story.
If we lose freedom here, there's no place to escape to.
This is the last stand on earth.
1964, folks.
This, the same battle that we face today is the same battle we faced in 1964.
The big difference is that the biggest threat to our freedom was external in 1964.
The biggest threat to our freedom today is internal.
It is now our own government, not a Soviet government.
Here's more Reagan.
This idea that government is beholden to the people that it has no other source of power except the sovereign people, is still the newest and the most unique idea in all the long history of man's relation to man.
This is the issue of this election.
Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far distant capital can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves.
You and I are told increasingly we have to choose between a left or right.
Well, I'd like to suggest there is no such thing as a left or right.
There's only an up or down.
Man's old age dream, the ultimate in individual freedom consistent with law and order, or down to the ant heap of totalitarianism.
And does this next sound exactly like today's Democrats?
Or what?
Liberals never give up.
Liberalism Never stops.
It takes men like Reagan to stand up and say no.
Senator Clark of Pennsylvania, another articulate spokesman defines liberalism as meeting the material needs of the masses through the full power of centralized government.
Well, I, for one, resent it when a representative of the people refers to you and me, the free men and women of this country, as the masses.
This is a term we haven't applied to ourselves in America.
But beyond that, the full power of centralized government.
This was the very thing the founding fathers sought to minimize.
They knew that governments don't control things.
A government can't control the economy without controlling people.
And they know when a government sets out to do that, it must use force and coercion to achieve its purpose.
They also knew those founding fathers that outside of its legitimate functions, government does nothing as well or as economically as the private sector of the economy.
Now consider this next.
As Obama goes around the world apologizing for America, dither on deciding whether we should try to win the war in Afghanistan or hand the country and the people who live there back to the Taliban.
Consider this.
We cannot buy our security, our freedom from the threat of the bomb.
By committing an immorality so great as saying to a billion human beings now enslaved behind the iron curtain, give up your dreams of freedom.
Because to save our own skins, we're willing to make a deal with your slave masters.
Alexander Hamilton said a nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master and deserves one.
Now let's set the record straight.
There's no argument over the choice between peace and war, but there's only one guaranteed way you can have peace.
And you can have it in the next second.
Surrender.
Finally, the rendezvous with destiny, and we are there again.
You and I have a rendezvous with destiny.
We'll preserve for our children this the last best hope of man on earth, or we'll sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness.
The era of Reagan is the era of our founding.
It is never over.
Ronald Reagan is not being held up as somebody whom every candidate must be like.
That's not possible.
People like me who love and appreciate Ronald Reagan have no cult-like appreciation for Reagan.
This is not an attachment to a personality.
It's an attachment to leadership and ideals and principles.
Ideals and principles, which will never die because freedom will never die.
Therefore, the era of Reagan will never be over.
Well, that's it, folks.
Another excursion into broadcast excellence gone in the blink of an eye.
Fastest three hours in media.
You remember last week, um, had a little fun with this New York Times guy, Revkin, who seriously considered the uh carbon limiting implications of uh limiting uh childbirths to one per family.
And I said, just show us some leadership on this.
I mean, you always tell everybody else to go to not have to go ahead and show us how it works, you know, die.
And save the planet.
He was profoundly offended by this.
▲
Export Selection