All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 14, 2009 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:39
October 14, 2009, Wednesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
And look at some of these headlines, ladies and gentlemen.
Storm menaces California, burned areas, risk mudslides.
Heavy snow, expected in Pennsylvania.
Chicago record-breaking cold continues.
Montana cold weather records fall.
And of course, the 09 Atlantic hurricane season forecasts blown to smithereens, the quietest hurricane season in 10 years.
How's that global warming and climate change working for you?
The greetings, folks.
Welcome.
It's Rush Limbaugh.
This is the EIB Network and the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Great to have you with us.
We're faced with I've I got the same dilemma today that I had yesterday.
I got live to see uh have 27 sound bites.
No, of the 27 sound bites, 18 are about me.
They continue to spread the false fabricated quotes and lies, and people continue to comment on them.
So I'm faced with a dilemma.
What do I do with this?
Uh and I'm thinking I'm going to probably do the same thing that we did yesterday.
You just run them right smacked together back to back to back as we did.
They speak for themselves.
And uh and then comment as um as necessary.
Uh, but there are other things in the news, of course, and I, ladies and gentlemen, refuse to be distracted by myself.
I will allow not allow myself to distract myself uh in the middle of this storm.
One thing that I I do want to say to you about this this whole NFL thing that's going on right now.
I'm I'm being inundated with um emails from all of you, from many of you, expressing your anger and your desire to support, desire to help us.
And I can't tell you how much I appreciate it.
You know, the bond that you and I have as host and audience is one that uh the media can't break, despite their efforts for 21 years, and it's the single greatest thing I appreciate about my success.
Uh that being that it's yours.
Uh it wouldn't have happened without you.
The fact that you're there uh uh each and every day and have been for 21 years is something I can never actually properly thank you all for, other than to say it.
And it seems so uh insufficient when I say it.
But I do love you all, and I thank you all so much uh for your support.
I want to I want to say that many people have emailed me, and they're right about this, that this is not about me.
Not just about me.
This is not about the NFL, it's not about the St. Louis Rams, it's not about me.
This is about the ongoing effort by the left in this country, wherever you find them in the media, the Democrat Party, or wherever, to destroy conservatism, to prevent the mainstreaming of anyone who is prominent as a conservative.
That's what this is about.
Therefore, this is about the future of the United States of America and what kind of country we're going to have.
Now, I'm not trying to elevate this Ram situation beyond its reality because it's a subset of this.
The uh NFL is just a subset of this.
This is uh it's nothing new.
This is just the latest attack.
It happens to be uh more intense uh than ever, and the leaders of this movement happened to be the August characters of Al Sharpton and the Reverend Dassie uh Jackson.
Uh, remember both of these two hustlers quickly raced down to North Carolina, and they convicted the Duke LaCrosse players.
They were convinced the Duke LaCrosse players were guilty as charged when they there was the whole thing was a lie.
That whole episode was based on a lie, and the media believed it, and you remember how outraged everybody was about it.
And to this day, there have been no apologies.
There have been no apologies from Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton or the faculty at Duke or anybody that jumped on that case.
And presumed because of a prejudice and bigotry that those white lacrosse players were guilty as charged.
You didn't even need any evidence.
It just fit the temple.
You had a poor black dancer struggling to stay afloat, uh, being hired by a bunch of rich jocks to come over and perform at a at a party at midnight.
Oh, yeah, it makes total sense that they would uh sexually abuse.
Oh, yeah, we don't even have to question this.
Well, they believe women don't lie about these kinds of things?
And we all know the result of this.
And Sharpton and Jackson haven't said a word about it.
They haven't been held to account, nor has anybody been held to account for spreading that lie.
That was also an effort to destroy mainstream conservatism.
That is what this Obama administration is about.
That is what the Democrat Party is, of course, about.
And of course, now they all have allies in the media, which is sadly lost any dignity, character, and professionalism that it ever had.
We have Al Sharpton, who made his bones, rabble rousing, and promoting a hoax, which resulted in a policeman being sent to jail.
Or being was he, that's begonus.
He was tried.
The whole thing was a was a hoax, and Al Sharpton's credibility rises to the top.
Al Sharpton belongs in this smear.
It is a smear characterized by mischaracterization and lies.
Now, Sharpton wasn't on the bus immediately when it started, but he certainly shoved the driver aside and is trying to drive the bus now, uh, sharing duties with Jesse Jackson.
Of uh, by the way, uh, I think Jesse Jackson called Jews in New York and called New York Heime Town in a conversation with the Washington Post.
Uh these are the paragons of virtue that today's media rely on for source information, for characterization of other people's fitness.
Sharpton Jackson the perfect drivers of this bus that runs on the fuel of fabrication, emitting its noxious fumes all over the place, with a buffont of righteous indignation and outrage while they're at the wheel.
This is how Sharpton rose to fame with Tawana Brawley.
People know him for what he is now, but that's not the point.
Sharpton got himself a nice ride out of that episode.
Sharpton's credibility was enhanced.
He's now a go-to guy for a corrupt national media.
There's a whole bunch of people have tickets to ride with Sharpton on his bus than Jesse Jackson, and they're all of the same character.
For some reason, it didn't occur to the state controlled media to check the veracity of Sharpton's allegations.
They just accept them.
Yeah, I guess so, just like they accepted Mike Nyphong and his allegations of rape at Duke University.
Suddenly, the state controlled media loses its journalistic character to hop on board with Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson.
Oh yeah.
Really a high point for the media.
This time, the media are a party to a lie, a willing party to a lie, a series of lies, sitting in the front of the Sharpton smear bus, hosting him, interviewing him, promoting him.
Nothing new here, folks.
Jesse Jackson, too.
Other less prominent people are hopping on and off that bus.
Most of them are ignorant of the facts.
Others are deceiving themselves out of prejudice.
And those people are always going to be out there, and I know that.
Some are some are going to learn the truth, others won't.
It has always been this way.
I don't care.
Anybody can take me on about what I have said.
I expect that, and I don't even shy away from it.
But to go after me about what I have not said shows the character of the people behind this smear.
Otherwise, intelligence people, intelligent people believing these lies, shows their character.
The lack of curiosity on the part of people I have met, the lack of curiosity on the part of people I know.
To say, what?
That doesn't sound like I've never, I that doesn't sound like limbo.
To just blanketly accept it, shows the character of the people believing the smear.
When the truth comes out, will it be too late?
Yeah, for some things possibly, but the big picture, the pursuit of truth, is not a sprint, it's a marathon.
And the truth always wins when it comes out.
I know this for a fact.
This is all not just about me.
It's about every one of us and what kind of country we're going to have in the effort to discredit those who speak up for liberty, fairness, capitalism, freedom.
Those of us who speak up pose the biggest threat to the left in this country today.
Individualism, rugged individualism.
This is not desired, it's not wanted.
And so anybody who has the ability to speak up and be persuasive about it is going to be targeted for a smear and for destruction.
So it's not, it's this is not about the National Football League.
It's not about the St. Louis Rams.
It's that's just a subset.
This is the latest in a long line of attempts by the left to discredit any of us who believe what we believe.
Sarah Palin, you got the list is as long as I wanted to make it.
And I wanted to make sure that I thank you all for your support.
And I wanted to make sure you understood that I know exactly what this is all about.
And I want you to also understand.
I'm I I'm not even thinking of exiting.
I'm not even thinking of caving.
I am not a caver.
None of us are.
We have been betrayed by too many who have caved.
Pioneers take the arrows.
We are pioneers.
It's a sad thing that our country, over 200 years old now, needs pioneers all over again, but we do.
Quick time out.
We'll be back after this.
Stay with us.
Stay with us.
We are back.
By the way, the Miami Dolphins have a new uh owner, a new limited partner owner.
Uh her name is Fergie, and she is in the popular group called the Black Eyed Peas.
Uh the leader of that group is Will Iam.
Here's a little um audio clip from the music of the Black Eyed Peas, which will now be featured prominently as uh owners of the National Football League's Miami Dolphin.
Fergie, uh new limited partner owner of the Miami Dolphins of the National Football League.
Second Republican Senator signaled yesterday, actually today, that she is open to voting for a sweeping health care bill this year, putting Obama closer to an historic achievement that has eluded generations of Democrat leaders.
It is none other than Wait for it.
Susan Collins of Maine.
Who would have thought this?
Dare I say women.
Damn it.
We have 35 seconds to bleep that comment.
I'm going to poll the staff.
Snerdley, do you think uh we should uh Dawn, should we bleep it or leave it?
Leave it.
Brian, what do you think?
Okay, I got three votes here in Florida to leave a comments in.
Well, HR, what do you think?
We got about 20 seconds here.
Okay, uh mommy issue, I'm good.
And Mamon, your vote doesn't matter since even if you vote bleep it, you're overvoted, so the comment stays.
I got a unanimous vote.
Five zip, leave it.
So it's in.
Susan Collins told EAP that the bill approved by the finance committee.
There is no there's no bill here.
This is this is the most Mitch McConnell said, by the way, this proposal will never make it to the Senate floor.
He said the Senate will never vote on this.
He issued a statement yesterday.
The Senate will not vote on.
That I want to see.
But she said here that Finance Committee needs substantial improvements to make coverage more affordable, contain costs, and protect medical.
Well, she is admitting it none of that stuff's in there.
Uh, nevertheless, she joined her main colleague Olympia Snow in endorsing the goal of far-reaching changes.
This is the we gotta do something chorus.
We gotta do something.
Why, we gotta have a bill.
We gotta have a bill.
By the way, Michael Jackson is up for some posthumous awards.
What is this?
The um American Music Awards.
Michael Jackson been posthumously nominated For five American Music Awards, including Artist of the Year.
He's lined up against Lady Gaga, Kings of Leon, Taylor Swift, and the rapper Eminem in the key category.
Winners will be announced at a ceremony of Los Angeles on what is it, uh, November 22nd.
Uh Obama's gonna win all these awards.
I don't know.
What is everybody talking about?
This is unfortunate.
We already have it on good authority that Obama's gonna sweep these awards, win all of the awards in every category.
It's a done deal.
In one final dissock.
Now, last night in Durham University, at Duke University in Durham, the renowned investigated journalist uh uh uh uh Seymour Hirsch showed up to make speech.
Now, this goes back to my opening comments on this program.
The military, the Pentagon, who he hates, by the way, which he hates, is waging war with the White House.
The U.S. military is not just fighting wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, said America's most renowned investigative journalist, the Army is also in a war against the White House, and they feel they have Obama boxed in.
This is the Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter Seymour Hirsch.
They think he's weak.
They think Obama's the wrong color.
Yes, there's racism in the Pentagon.
We may not like to think that, but it's true, and we all know it.
A lot of people in the Pentagon would like to see him get into trouble, says Hirsch.
It gives them, if he gives them the extra troops they're asking for, he loses politically.
And if he doesn't give them the troops, he also loses politics.
So here is what it's come to.
Everything, exactly as I predicted, every bit of opposition to Obama is racist.
Now the entire Pentagon is racist.
The entire military is racist, according to the world's most renowned investigative reporter and journalist.
Seymour Hirsch is a lunatic.
So you see the pattern here, and it's only going to get worse as Obama continues to fail.
As Obama's policies continue to do the exact opposite of what he has promised everybody.
This economy is an embarrassment.
It needn't be this way.
This is the United States of America.
If if this man and this administration would simply get out of everyone's way and turn the people who make this country work loose, we would have a vibrant recovery faster than you could snap your fingers.
And we would be creating 40,000 jobs a day in this country.
Because it's the people who make this country work, and the people right now are being sandwiched, they're being fired, they're being laid off.
The people who make this country work face a desolate future.
There is no way this economy can recover.
And this economy can once again become what it was, the United States of America, as long as the controls which are in place and the additional controls which will be put in place occur.
It is just really frustrating.
So does this story.
New York Times Federal Paysar tries again to trim AIG bonuses.
The Federal Paysar.
Can you believe that we even have such a person?
A czar, not somebody confirmed by the Senate, not somebody accountable to the voters in any way.
We have a guy, a czar, who determines pay.
And he is trying to force AIG to reduce 198 million dollars in bonuses promised to employees of its trading unit, where problems posed a threat to the global financial system last year.
Kenneth Feinberg is the guy's name.
And it says here in a disappointed tone in the New York Times, he's running into legal hurdles because those bonuses fall outside the new rules against bonus payments at companies receiving government assistance.
The bonus agreements at issue were struck before last year's emergency rescue by the Treasury and the Federal Reserve, and thus are not directly covered by the new rules.
Look at what happened.
AIG, a bunch of entrepreneurs found a workaround.
They found a loophole.
Can I give you a quote from this piece?
The new audit pointed out that the bonus program for the financial products unit was unusual because it included payments to unessential people.
The federal Pazar looks at workers, employees, and some of them are unessential.
Unessential to whom, sir?
He cited a $7,700 bonus for a kitchen assistant, a $7,000 bonus for a mailroom assistant, $700 for a file administrator.
So raises for the little people.
Raises and bonuses for poor all those Democrats, they care so much about the poor and the little guy they're going to really stand up.
And now the little guy is going to get a bonus.
7,000 bucks, 700 bucks, 7700 bucks.
The Pazar is gonna stop this from happening.
Yeah, we're going to take care of this.
We'll be right back.
You know, my friends, it's amazing how fast things change.
Just last year, one year ago, if you called a phony soldier, a phony soldier.
If you called a legitimately phony soldier, a phony soldier, the s the president of the Senate, the Senate majority there would run to the microphones and denounce you and demand that your syndication partner make you apologize or more.
You were anti-American if you called a phony soldier or soldier.
And you were against the whole military.
That's what Harry Reid tried to portray me as.
Now you can go to Duke University.
You can give a lecture that says the military is at war with Obama because they're all racists.
A year ago, it was only poor blacks and Hispanics and other people in the military.
Remember, a year ago, and for years prior to that, the only people in the military were poor blacks, poor minorities, and poor people who had no hope because America was such a dastardly place.
America was so rotten.
The economy was so bad.
There were no chances for education, no chances for job success.
You had to go to the military.
A year ago, it was fine and dandy to sully the members of the military who volunteered to put their lives on the line to defend the freedom of idiots like Harry Reed and Seymour Hirsch to say and write what they do.
Now, one year later, the military is all a bunch of white supremacists arrayed against Obama, wanting him to fail.
One year, one year later.
It's all white supremacists in the Pentagon who want Obama to fail.
We are in the midst.
This racist nonsense.
We are in the midst of yet another teachable moment.
Everybody sees how our media will just jump on anything without any regard whatsoever as to whether it is true or not.
They will use anything to advance their agenda.
True or not.
Doesn't really matter to them.
Just like they do with their reporting of the regular news.
Don't forget that.
As they have run with fabricated false made-up quotes, as they have spread this filth into the mainstream, knowingly and purposefully.
You need to judge every other news story they report with the same skepticism.
The same sense of suspicion and disbelief.
That you are watching unfold with this whole National Football League St. Louis Rams story.
It's amazing.
What can change inside of a year?
Yes, unessential people.
You heard me right, folks.
The Pazar has determined that a kitchen assistant, a mailroom assistant, and a file administrator at AIG's bonuses.
They don't pass the test.
$7700 bonus, $7,000 bonus, $700 bonus.
These are poor people.
These are the little guys.
These are the people that Democrats say that they're looking out for.
And they're referred to in the New York Times or the Pazar as unessential.
And the federal Pazar is trying to force AIG to reduce some of these payments.
That's being there being no, and the way they're doing this, they're telling the CEO, uh, you either stop the bonuses or we're gonna cut your pay.
You you you You stop these.
This is like a mobster holding a guy out the window by his foot.
The Pazar is telling the guy who runs the shop there at AIG, stop these bonuses, or we cut your pay.
These are unessential people.
By the way, I got a note here from a friend who sent me a uh excerpt from a column by Terry Jeffrey.
The editor-in-chief, Cybercast News Service, his latest column explains how the Senate health care bill will send people to the DMV for their health insurance.
We have been joking about this.
We make jokes about these people, and they come true.
The public option is only one lane on the road to socialized medicine.
The most revelatory passage in the so-called plain English version of the health care bill that the Senate Committee approved yesterday.
And again, I want to remind you, they have not even drafted the actual legislative language.
They're still working on a draft.
They voted on nothing.
They passed nothing which clears them now to write something in secret that nobody's ever going to see, and nobody's ever going to read.
But in this plain English version draft, it says that in the future Americans will be offered the convenience of getting their health insurance at the Department of Motor Vehicles.
This is not a joke.
If this bill becomes law, it will be the duty of the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services or the state governments overseeing federally mandated health insurance exchanges to ensure that you get your health insurance at the DMV, page 19 of the committee's plain English text says the secretary and/or states would do the following.
Enable customers to enroll in health care plans in local hospitals, schools, departments of motor vehicles, local social security offices, and other offices designated by the state.
And yet we're built, we're still being clear.
There's no public option here.
They're setting it up so that one of the places you will have to go for your mandated insurance will be the DMV.
The public options, only one lane on the road to socialized medicine, government subsidies, and government regulations are two others, and they run like a super highway through the Finance Committee bill.
Under that bill, it'll be far cheaper for a business to pay the government $400 per worker than to pay a private insurance company thousands per worker for an insurance plan.
The finance committee has created an irresistible incentive for American businesses to drop their workers off at the DMV.
I was driving home yesterday.
I had satellite radio in the car, and I decided to dial in the Fox News channel.
And I was listening to Shep Smith.
Yeah, Shepard Smith interviewing Michael Steele.
So The uh head of the Republican National Committee.
And Steele was talking about the health bill.
And Steele was, you know, going through the talking points.
It's going to raise taxes, it's going to reduce uh fees and services.
The dry ball talking point stuff is Shep Smith's, I think you're you're you misunderstand.
The public option is simply an option.
It's a it's a way to add competition to the market.
It is a way to reduce costs and make all this more.
And Steele did not know what to say.
I'm not ripping steel.
I'm sitting there driving.
I imagine this happens to you all the time when you're watching TV.
I don't watch these shows much anymore.
I have my quirk of fate.
Dial it in yesterday.
I'm saying, no, Michael, what you tell him here is this.
The public option exists to destroy private insurance and to destroy competition because it's going to force people and businesses to offload their uh employer-provided health care benefits and force people to go to the government to get it.
That's the whole point of it.
That's why it is there, and that's why that they're gonna this bill makes the uh public option insurance dirt cheap to begin with.
If you run a business and it costs you, say, eight thousand dollars per employee to give them health care benefits, and all of a sudden, big brother government comes along and says, I'll do it.
I'm in the game, and we're gonna insure your employees at 400 bucks ahead instead of 8,000.
What are you gonna do?
You offload them.
And this is all being done in the name of competition.
It stifles competition.
I'm driving along, I'm listening to this, and I'm saying.
Good lord.
The answer to this is simple.
Some people think the sales technique for our side is just a resite, you know, a litany of it's going to raise taxes, it's uh it's gonna do this, it's gonna do that.
That's not the way to address this.
Uh there's a great piece, investors.com by one of my favorite economic writers, Robert J. Samuelson.
And I gotta take a break here, but let me give you the headline.
Health spending condemns youth to the future of downward mobility.
I'll give you the sad details.
And keep in mind, this is by design.
This is on purpose.
When we come back.
Hi, are you...
Rush Limbaugh here, the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
By the way, the uh the plan here, the plan to have us all go to the DMV to get our mandated health insurance from the Federal Health Exchange.
I mean, from a Democrat point of view, it's actually um pretty brilliant.
Because you can also register to vote at the DMV.
And when you register, or you can change your registration of the DMV.
So you can go in for your federally mandated insurance and change your registration to Democrat and get the best coverage.
You go in and register you for health, they'll find out what political party you're a member of.
You think it might affect the way you're going to be treated at the DMV.
This um this little soundbite next up is fascinating.
Robert B. Rice.
Duh.
...
A former labor secretary and mislabeled professor.
He's a lecturer at wherever he lectures.
He's not a professor.
He was making a speech back in 2007, September 26, 2007, at Berkeley, at the University of California at Berkeley.
It was giving a speech, and during part of the speech, he said, This is what Democrat politicians would say if they could really be honest.
We are going to have to, if you're very old.
We're not going to give you all that technology and all those drugs for the last couple of years of your life to keep you maybe going for another couple of months.
It's too expensive.
So we're going to let you die.
Labor Secretary Robert B. Reich speaking on behalf of the Democrat Party, University of California at Berkeley, in a speech heralded for its openness and honesty.
What Democrat politicians would say if they could really be honest.
2007.
And note the we here.
We are going to.
We are Reich was nothing.
I mean, he's a commentator on television.
We here play it one more time.
I want you to hear this, folks.
We are going to have to, if you're very old, we're not going to give you all that technology and all those drugs for the last couple of years of your life to keep you maybe going for another couple of months.
It's too expensive.
So we're going to let you die.
Take a pain pill.
Obama said the same thing.
Take a pain pill.
A woman asked if Obama would take into account her 100-year-old mother's will to live, her spunk in Obama said, I don't think we can factor that in.
Um we're going to be making smarter decisions here.
Uh frankly, it's probably going to make more sense just to tell your mother to take a pain pill.
You know, and veg out, loop out for the uh rest of her life.
We're just not going to pay for it.
They're going to let you die.
We are going to let you die.
We are going to let you die.
With dignity.
We are going to kill you.
You are unessential.
If you um are a file assistant, if you're a kitchen worker, and your company gives you a bonus, uh-uh.
I take it back.
You're unessential.
We're going to let you die.
These are the people running the United States of America.
These are the people spreading lies throughout the media on everything they report.
We're going to let you die.
Robert Samuelson health spending condemns youth to a future of downward mobility.
Every generation of Americans should live better than its predecessor.
That's America's core definition of economic progress.
But for today's young, it may be a mirage.
Higher health spending, increasing energy prices, stretched governments at all levels, may squeeze future disposable incomes, what people have to spend, and public services.
Are we condemning our children to downward mobility?
Good question.
Considering how health spending could threaten future living standards, it ought to be center stage in the reform debate.
Instead, it's ignored.
As we're just going to let you die.
You're unessential.
An off-stated view is that the growth of the U.S. economy will make the young so much richer than their parents that they can afford bigger health care sectors, still enjoy large increases in their living standards, complaining about providing more general uh generous health care selfish.
This is a powerful argument.
Unfortunately, it isn't true.
Look at the table above.
It portrays the U.S. economy from 1980 with a projection for 2030 from Moody's Economy.com.
The projection assumes that the recession ends and growth revives.
Superficial, I can't, too many numbers.
I'd lose you if I went to the chart here with you, but we will link to this at RushLimbaugh.com.
Superficially.
The table suggests that economic growth can easily pay for more health care.
In 2007, the economy's total output, GDP, national income, was 13.3 trillion.
In 2030, it projected to 22.6 trillion.
That's a 70% increase.
Surely that's ample.
No, not really.
First, the economy's growth is projected to slow in the future, reflecting an aging population, which we're just going to let die.
Lots of workers would retire.
The labor force doesn't expand much.
From 1980 to 2007, GDP grew an average 3.1% annually.
From 2007 to 2030, Moody is projecting a 2.4% annual growth.
The young's future has been heavily mortgaged, too, folks.
Downward mobility is possible.
Expanding health spending would raise taxes to pay for government insurance, lower take-home pay to pay for employer-provided insurance, or increase out-of-pocket medical costs.
And there are other drains as well.
High energy prices to combat uh combat a mythical global warming, higher taxes to pay for underfunded state and local government pensions, repair aging infrastructure, higher federal taxes to cover deficits and payments to retirees.
The pressures will undermine private living standards and other public services.
The young's future has been heavily mortgaged, taken together.
All these demands might neutralize gains in per capita incomes, especially if the economy's performance, burdened by higher taxes or budget deficits deteriorates.
The road to downward mobility, as is all things liberal, paved with good intentions, he writes.
I dispute that.
I don't even buy the good intentions.
There's no good intentions behind any plan Obama has put into action so far.
Not good for us.
The health care debate has focused on ensuring the uninsured and de-emphasized controlling runaway spending, much of which is ineffective.
The priorities should be reversed.
Exactly right.
They're using the uninsured to sell this monstrosity.
That's the point.
What they're seeking is total control and the uh right, the ability to regulate every aspect of our lives.
Brief time out, back with more.
I promise I'll get to your phone calls the next hour pretty quick.
Stay with us.
Stay with us.
About this Robert Samuelson piece.
You know he's right.
Uh we've always defined economic progress as uh each generation doing better than the previous generation.
And we may we for our generation may be, thanks to President Obama, the first one to make sure that our children's lives are not better than ours.
It's heartbreaking, and it's frustratingly obscene when you realize it's all by design.
It's all on purpose.
▲
Export Selection