All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 5, 2009 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:46
October 5, 2009, Monday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And the views expressed by the host on the show make more sense than anything anybody else out there happens to be saying.
The views expressed by the host of this program now documented to be almost always right in 99.1% of the time as we meet and surpass all audience expectations.
Here's the telephone number.
If you'd like to join us, 800-282-2882, the email address L Rushbow at EIBNet.com.
Your phone calls, we're going to get to them quickly in this hour.
I appreciate all of you who are on hold and your patience.
Chicago Tribune yesterday, Obama was told a trip to the Olympics meeting may clinch the Chicago win.
Turns out, well, the intelligence we had from the U.S. Olympic Committee and Chicago bid team was it was very close and therefore well worth our efforts, said Valerie Jarrett, the well-known slumlord in Chicago and senior White House advisor.
The message was that a personal appeal from the president would make a huge difference.
Ho, folks, this is a guy that's going to talk Iran out of building nukes.
So his his team says, somebody at the IOC says you get Obama over here, and it might put you over the top.
Now it is clear that somebody, if this is true, that somebody in the IOC knew exactly how to play to Obama's ego for the express purpose of embarrassing him.
I think Obama needs to take off the skirt, put on a pair of pants like real guys do, and the media needs to start treating him like a quarterback.
It doesn't get kid glove treatment.
Um weekend, all weekend long, uh the the the word about what happened was failure.
Excusing failure, ignoring failure, blaming failure, enjoying failure, pretending it's too mean to enjoy failure.
Uh and remember now, if this had happened to George W. Bush, the glee would still be going on with these people in the media.
But Obama and Michelle My Bell made terrible presentations to the IOC.
I watched these speeches.
My junior high drama teacher and my speech teacher from my first year in college would have flunked me and everybody else for turning in those self-centered, self-aggrandizing junior high speeches.
If you look at these speeches and read them, it makes perfect sense.
They got booted in round one.
They flunked.
They failed.
Michelle My Bell was especially patronizing, slow talking.
She faked a crying voice, lying about the time she spent with her father sitting on his lap.
She's 20 years old watching Olympics telecasts and Carl Lewis winning medals.
Uh whining about the very special poverty and racism, discrimination of the Chicago trying to guilt the IOC into being charitable to the downtrodden Americans who suffered so much for so long until Obama got to the White House.
I mean, it was embarrassing.
It was truly embarrassing if you if you you don't even have to listen, just read these speeches.
And and Michelle's was all before we got to the it's all about bam speech.
Here's here's a couple quotes from what Obama said.
Nearly one year ago, on a clear November night, people from every corner of the world gathered in the city of Chicago or in front of their TVs to watch the results of the U.S. presidential election.
Their interest wasn't about me as an individual.
Your interest is only about you.
What does that have to do with the Olympic bid that people around the world gathered to watch the election returns?
If I had been sitting there in that committee, no amount of self-control could have kept me from rolling my eyes all the way to heaven, except they don't believe in heaven at the IOC.
Somehow he's president of the whole world, and that that justifies Chicago getting the Olympics.
He's bigger than himself as an individual.
Rather, it was rooted in the belief that America's experiment in democracy still speaks to a set of universal aspirations and ideals.
Did he really try to interject the notion of American exceptionalism?
If he did, it wasn't believable.
Obviously, IOC didn't fall for it.
He said at the beginning of this new century, the nation that has been shaped by people from around the world wants a chance to inspire it one more time.
Well, wait a minute.
Wait, I I thought the world was inspired by Obama's election.
I thought the world was in.
I thought the world was in stunned awe, and I thought that the world was bowing down and begging Obama to lead us all from bondage.
As he had to somehow lead himself from the bondage of his own existence?
And so I urge you to choose Chicago.
I urge you to choose America.
And if you do, if we walk this path together, then I promise you this.
The city of Chicago and the U.S. will make the world proud.
Proud of what?
A city, a wash in corruption?
The blood of gangs killing each other?
Proud of a country that Obama has done nothing but apologize for since inaugurated.
The only thing missing during Obama's speech to the IOC was somebody on the committee yelling, you lie.
Oh man, do you realize what I would have paid to see that happen?
Somebody on the IOC committee, you lie.
House liberals have floated a bill to bar a surge of troops for Afghanistan.
So the Democrats in the House are preparing to vote against victory once again.
It's becoming a little clearer now, folks.
Obama's liberal buddies are blocking a surge.
This is from the uh the blog at the Hill.com, the briefing room.
Nearly two dozen House liberals have signed onto a bill introduced this past week that would prohibit an increase of troops in Afghanistan.
A bill introduced by Representative Barber Lee, Democrat California Thursday would bar funding to increase troop level in Afghanistan beyond its current level.
Lee and 21 lawmakers, largely from the liberal congressional progressive caucus.
You mean did they really need a separate liberal caucus in the House?
Aren't they all liberal socialist jerks?
They need their own separate caucus.
They introduced the uh the bill HR 3699 on Thursday.
Uh who is this Jones?
Uh James Jones, the National Security Advisor, vowed that the president's decision on troops wouldn't be swayed by politics.
Waiting to hear the next story.
James Jones said, I don't play politics, I certainly don't play it with national security, neither does anyone I know.
I can assure you the president of the United States is not playing to any political base.
Mm-hmm.
Right.
And here's the next story from the UK telegraph.
You would not expect to see this here in the U.S. state-controlled media, according to sources close to the administration.
General Stanley McChrystal shocked and angered presidential advisers with the bluntness of a speech given in London last week.
Oh!
So that 25-minute meeting aboard Air Force One was addressing down blue uh Obama flew all the way across the world to yell at his general.
That's another thing I predicted.
Hey, he was really there to talk to McCristle.
The Olympic thing was an afterthought.
The next day, McCristal was summoned to an awkward 25-minute face-to-face meeting on board Air Force One on the tarmac in Copenhagen, where the president had arrived to tout Chicago's unsuccessful Olympic bid.
His unsuccessful Olympic bid.
In London, General McCristol, who heads the 68,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan, as well as the 100,000 NATO forces, flatly rejected proposals to switch to a strategy more reliant on drone missile strikes and special forces operations against Al Qaeda.
In a public speech, the general told the Institute of International and Strategic Studies that the formula, which is favored by General Vice President Joe Biden, would lead to Chaosistan.
When asked whether he would support it, he said the short answer is no.
So the general appointed by Obama went public, said Biden doesn't know what he's talking about, essentially, called a place Kazistan if Biden wins this, so what we have here is a battle in the administration between General McCristal, who's a genuine general, and General Biden, who's a general buffoon.
And we got these twenty-one members of the House liberal caucus voting against any money for a new surge in Afghanistan.
And then there's this from the LA Times.
This is great.
This is a Gregory Rodriguez.
It's an opinion piece.
Headline says it all.
What America needs is a good enemy.
An external threat is almost always a cure for national disunity.
We don't have any.
We don't have any good enemies.
Where is Osama bin Laden when we need him is how this peace opens.
I kid you not.
Where is Osama bin Laden when we need him?
That's like saying when Bush was president, somebody said, Where's Lee Harvey Oswald when we need him?
Remember that?
And that's when, of course, there were no problems with civility in our discourse.
Don't get me wrong, in no way do I wish death and destruction on our country, but as I listen to the increasingly vitriotic and even seditious rhetoric coming from the political right.
Seditious rhetoric coming from the political right, though that would be me, of course.
I can't help thinking that we need a threatening external enemy to help us cohere as a nation, a more looming threat than the almost vanished Al-Qaeda leader, or even his recently arrested alleged dominion in Denver.
It's not pretty, but it's true.
Both individual and collective identities are forged as much by declaring what and who you're against as what and who you are for.
Although we certainly don't wish for violence on the group we identify with, there are times when we can acknowledge the social value of circling the wagons.
The vitriotic and seditious rhetoric of the right.
Mr. Rodriguez, dude, the enemy that's in focus now on the part of the left is the United States as we know it.
The big enemy that you and your buddies see when you look out across the world is the United States and its constitution.
That's the enemy that you and Obama and everybody is fighting.
And we are not attacking, my man.
We wake up every day and we watch our constitution and our country under assault, and we defend it.
And then you get all crying and moaning and whining about the lack of civility.
With 9-11 less than a decade past, we've returned to our corners to fight it out among ourselves with a gender vengeance.
Despite the fact that we have dangerous global enemies, the members of the disgruntled right seem content to find their primary enemies domestically.
It's just projection again, just the uh exact opposite.
Is the left who sees us as the biggest enemy they face.
Though angry political dissent is an American tradition, the victory all is reaching new levels.
Last week, a columnist for a conservative website fantasized happily about a coup d'etat toppling President Obama.
In the meantime, we all but ignored bin Laden's most recent tape, and attention to the arrest and indictment of Afghan Denverite Najibulazazi on WMD conspiracy charges has been surprisingly low-key.
Such blasé responses.
Ignored Al-Qaeda We?
We ignored Al Qaeda.
These guys don't even want to talk about Afghanistan.
You don't want to talk about well, we've got an enemy.
We are at war in Afghanistan.
We got a guy in the LA Times wishing for a new enemy so that we can all coalesce.
It's breathtakingly ignorant.
I got a quick timeout.
Your phone calls are coming next, right after this.
Now, one thing that we have to assume here, well, we can't have to assume it.
I mean, we know it.
General McChrystal is serious.
He's a general.
General Biden is a buffoon.
What we ought to do, maybe let's divide Afghanistan up into three parts, like uh General Biden wanted to do in Iraq.
I remember Biden said he was gonna stuff Iraq down Bush's throat.
You remember that quote?
We're gonna stuff this bill down his throat.
Now, we have the worst Afghanistan attack in a year on troops, our troops in Afghanistan.
What McChrystal wants to do, he he wants to shift U.S. troops away from these remote outposts, which is where the killings are taking place, these remote outposts.
And McChrystal wants to uh shift trips troops away from those outposts that are difficult to defend and move them into more heavily populated areas as part of a new strategy to focus on protecting Afghan civilians, and this is what Obama's waiting on.
We're waiting for Obama to assist, and McCrystall goes out and makes speeches, Obama gets mad.
I don't know if he's being petulant, I don't know if he he just doesn't understand how to play the hardball Washington game.
Washington Post.
National Security Advisor James Jones suggested yesterday the public campaign has nothing to do with politics.
McCrystal says being short-sighted, comments effectively rejected a policy option that senior White House officials, including General Biden, are considering nearly eight years after the U.S. invasion.
It's Biden that wants to pull back in Afghanistan.
And McChrystal says, I I don't want to sit here and and be part of uh defeat.
So and then there's Petraeus.
Military memo, New York Times voice of Bush's favorite general is now harder to hear.
General David Petraeus, the face of the Iraq troop surge, a favorite of former President George W. Bush spoke up or was called upon by President Obama several times during the big Afghan strategy session in the situation room last week, and he'll be back for two more meetings this week.
But the general's closest associates say that underneath the surface of good relations, the celebrity commander faces a new reality in Obama's White House.
He's still at the table, but in a very different seat.
Petraeus, page two of this story is a military superstar.
He's got the White House worried.
Obama supposedly isn't, but Democrat political aides fear the presidential qualifications of Petraeus.
He hasn't taken a public stand behind McChrystal yet now, but uh leading that bit of politics to uh to others.
But clearly we've got a bunch of people in the White House in totally over their heads on this, and they are in fact making political calculations based on Obama's health care bill, which I I remind you, it was just last week.
Remember Obama said, no, we're never a public option.
I can that's not a necessary thing.
He's privately pushing a public option, and it's it it White House quietly pushing public option now.
The whole notion that there's not going to be a public option, and the Democrats have kind of came to understand that at BS.
There will be a public option.
It's always been the intent.
There's no reason to do national health care without it.
White House discreetly labors to weave a coalition.
Uh which he means basically that he's been secretly bribing members of Congress to go along with this.
But then you go to the Rasmussen poll, fear of losing private health insurance trumps the public option.
From yesterday, 63% of voters nationwide say guaranteeing that no one is forced to change their health insurance coverage is a higher priority than giving consumers the choice of a public option health insurance company.
No matter how you slice it, there's uh the sixty-three percent now.
57, 56, 63, somewhere within that range.
People don't want any part of this.
Zip zero, not uh it didn't matter.
If they have to stealthily get the public option, they'll do it, as we all know, and that's what's happening.
All right, to the phones, Newport Richie in Florida.
Betty, hello, welcome to the EIB network.
Great to have you here.
Oh, hi, Rush.
How are you?
Fine.
Thanks much.
That's good.
Do you know, Rush?
I spoke with you uh exactly a year ago in October before the big election.
And I explained to you that I'm in my 70s, my husband is in his eighties, and he fought in World War II.
And we said that I told you that we were going to vote for President Obama.
And of course, you were very upset about that.
But I want to know, like I asked the screener, what is your main reason why you dislike President Obama?
What is it?
Can you pinpoint it?
Well, easily.
Uh but first I should point out it's nothing personal.
I don't even know him.
Uh I think he does have a personality that kind of grates on anybody with that insufferably large and ego is uh is unbearable for me.
But no, I I don't like the fact that he looks at this country as an obstacle.
The greatness of this country, that there's no such thing as American exceptionalism, that the country is uh immoral and unjust before he was elected, and his effort to totally remake it and rebuild it with the government as the central focal point of everybody's lives is just something, Betty, that I can't abide.
There is you call remaking the country.
Would you call that like uh medical reform?
Would you call that trying to build a uh strategy for the uh war in Afghanistan?
Do you call that um a remake?
Uh the specifics, yeah.
Re w medic we're not talking about medical reform.
That's not what this is.
Health care reform is simply a vehicle for the denial of individual liberty and freedom and the opportunity for government to regulate every aspect of the moment you're awake and sleep.
And we're back.
El Rush Ball and the Excellence in Broadcasting Network with talent on loan from God.
We have a nursing home crisis brought to you by the people who want to control your health care.
What, you want me to answer that lady first?
Do I need I mean I I she's been listening to me for how long?
How long have how often have I said on this program what my problems with Obama are?
I don't believe we're trying to build a strategy to win the war in Afghanistan, Betty.
I think Obama has said he's uncomfortable with the whole concept of victory in Afghanistan.
He's got a public spat going on with a general.
He's not a general.
Obama looks at the military and kind of frowns.
He's not a big military guy.
He's one of these people who thinks the U.S. military is one of the problems in the world, not the solution.
He looks at the United States as one of the problems in the world, not a solution to the world's problems.
He said it over and over and over again.
I'm sorry.
He doesn't see the America I have lived in, and he doesn't want the America I've lived in to continue.
He wants to remake it, government being the focal point of everybody's life.
National health care is simply a gold mine of regulatory power for people like Obama.
And the reason, Betty, it's not going to be implemented in 2013, is because he'll be re-elected, he hopes in 2012, once this thing gets implemented, there's going to be a revolt, but there's nothing anybody can do about it at the ballot box.
He'll be in.
That's why none of this stuff gets implemented while he's in his first term.
Bad enough talking about it, but wait till the stuff actually happens, wait till people actually have to start living these policies.
His objective is to destroy the wealth of 70% of the people in the country and transfer it to the 30% of the country he thinks have gotten a shaft since the founding of this country.
And that's what he's in the process of doing.
The student loan business is now totally run by the government.
Or it will be starting next year.
If we're not careful, whenever you need a loan of any kind for any reason, you're going to have to go to an Obama-controlled entity.
And then do you think it might matter whether or not you support Obama or contribute to Democrats as to whether or not you'll be given assistance with your financial needs?
Well, why are we even talking about this?
This is not the role of the U.S. government.
None of it's mentioned in the founding.
None of it's mentioned in the Constitution.
I mean, all I have to know is what Obama has said.
The Constitution is a list of negative rights.
I'm sorry.
From that perspective, how can the Constitution be negative?
The Constitution tells government what it cannot do to the people.
Obama looks at that as a negative.
He wants the Constitution to say what government can do to people.
Well, he says for.
But he means too.
This is this is a dangerous man, Betty.
This is this is this guy wants to do things that your husband fought World War II for to prevent.
If I may be so bold.
And now we have this.
The nation's nursing homes are perilously close to laying off workers, cutting services, possibly even closing because of a perfect storm wallop from the recession and deep federal and state government spending cuts.
The headline of this AP story, waves of new fund cuts imperil U.S. nursing homes.
What kind of cuts you say?
Well, a Medicare rate adjustment that cuts an estimated 16 billion dollars in nursing home funding over the next ten years was enacted at week's end by the Federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services on top of state level cuts or flat funding that already had the industry reeling, and Congress is debating slashing billions more in Medicare funding as part of a health care reform.
But wait, but wait, but wait, what I I thought they weren't gonna touch Medicare.
I thought they were going to get money from Medicare by cutting out fraud and abuse, and already were dangerously close to closing some nursing homes.
But I thought they weren't gonna do any of this.
They weren't gonna do any of this, Betty, but they're doing it right before your very eyes.
How you don't see it mystifies me.
The funding crisis comes as the nation's baby boomers age even closer toward needing the nursing home care.
The nation's 16,000 nursing homes housed 1.85 million people last year, up from 1.79 million people in 2007, according to the Census Bureau.
It's uh bad out there, Betty.
All you have to do is have the courage to believe what you see.
Susan in uh Monrovia, California, glad you called.
Nice to have you on the EIB network.
Hi, Rush.
You've got another mad Susan in Southern California.
That would be you.
And oh, yes, oh yes.
And I think what m makes me so furious is that we keep on looking at this president when in reality it's Barack Puppet Obama, and we need to start looking at where he takes his talking points every day.
This is a man who looks at a t teleprompter, and if it fails, he has no idea.
So we have to look at Ron Emmanuel, the media.
We have to look at the labor unions, the ACLU.
We have to look at these wonderful czars, which were all election obligations given, and that's who we need to start focusing on.
Because Barack he's a teleprompter, and only if it works.
It's most frustrating.
I you think I'm mad?
No.
Uh well, not deranged mad.
I think you're angry, yeah.
It's it's just I it's amazing when I listen to a woman such as Betty, and she doesn't see that this last election was all about the media getting its power back, all about the media.
They took a man who had no experience, a couple days in the Senate, they even chose the Republican candidate, and then they wonder why.
All of this is going on.
It was all about control, and they got it back.
Well, I don't disagree with this, as you well know.
I myself have articulated these sentiments.
I know the media was desperate to uh uh show itself that it had the power to shape public opinion and public events and their outcome uh and all that, but I t the the thing that you said about who is Obama, who's writing the stuff, but if he's not the teleprompter, he's nowhere.
Uh I'm we've gone back and forth uh on on that subject.
Is Obama a puppet?
Is he a Manchurian candidate?
Uh what is he?
And whether or not he's a Manchurian can, you what you have to understand, Susan, is that he believes it regardless whether he can write it himself, whether he can put it on the prompter himself, he believes it.
This is who he is.
Whether he's a front man for somebody else, who would it be?
George Soros, uh Ram Emanuel Axelrod, there clearly, you know, I if if if my sensibilities are quite naive.
If uh didn't take me long to see the reality.
I think a lot of people bought into this whole postpartisan Obama's a brand new kind of guy.
He's gonna get rid of all the partisan divide, no more blue state, red state, and he had a lot of supporters in that basis, a lot of people joining him in the White House.
Then it wouldn't have taken me very long to realize this is not who I thought he was.
This is not right.
This is not what this country is all about.
Government does not run everything that happens here.
We're not gonna enact policies that are gonna destroy the U.S. economy.
We're not gonna do, and yet nobody's defected.
And if you look at the people that he has put in there, He's got child abusers, he's got he's got perverts, he's got noted communists, he's got people who do not like this country at every level of his administration.
So you have to assume that's him too.
Well, maybe, but I think the only thing um Obama believes in is himself.
I think he's a huge ego.
And I think he is so angry right now that he can get on a microphone and no one's buying it except Sabatrew Betty.
And there are people out there that are still holding on to the 60s movement, feeling that it's Enron.
Yet they're not looking at GE.
That, you know, they that it's all about what he says, and he's going to make the change.
And I disagree.
I think he only believes in himself.
I think he does hate the U.S., but I only think he believes in himself.
Well, I think he hates the U.S. I think he sees the U.S. as an opportunity for it to be remade in a in a way that he thinks is more fair and more just uh because it's basically the whole country was structured and put together in the most unfair discriminatory uh uh ways.
But look, uh there's no questioning his ego, but don't doubt for a moment that he's just a brainless puppet here executing somebody else's words.
This guy, it this is who he is.
This is in his heart.
This is in his brain, it's how he was raised, it's how he's been taught.
And it's why he's able to surround himself with so many people like him, because the shocking truth is that there are a lot of them in this country who believe exactly as he does.
I gotta run, take a quick timeout back after this, folks.
Now, this is really interesting.
This is very interesting.
This is from the UK Daily Mail, and it's about a judge in Alabama.
Ex-Judge, accused of spanking U.S. male inmates in his office and awarding them reduced jail time in return for sex.
A former judge facing life in prison after being charged with sexually abusing male inmates in exchange for leniency, respected circuit judge Herman Thomas, who probably never misses a Letterman episode, who was once the Democrat Party's choice to be the first black federal judge in South Alabama, is accused of bringing inmates into his chambers and spanking him with a paddle.
His trial for charges of sodomy, kidnapping, sex abuse, extortion, maybe he's gonna be a czar with Obama after they pardon him.
His uh trial set to begin today.
Forty eight-year-old in Sissy's innocent claims he was trying to mentor the inmates.
The National Association for the Advancement of Liberal Colored People has defended uh Herman Thomas and claims race is behind his prosecution.
He is an African American.
Well, filmmaking or uh a czar ship with Obama, maybe legals are.
I mean, we got the safe school czar as a pervert from way back.
Why not get another pervert as the legals are?
Now, all of these details, local Democrats and lawyers recruited Herman Thomas.
They got a Republican governor to appoint him to a vacancy in 1990.
He later won election to a full term.
1997, Alabama's presidential advisory committee recommended that Bill Clinton appoint Herman Thomas as the first black federal judge in the Southern District of Alabama.
The nomination was never acted on after Herman Thomas failed to get the American Bar Association's top rating and amid some squabbling within the party.
This is in the UK Daily Mail.
You will not find this in the state-controlled U.S. media.
Well, I wonder if this guy's getting his advice from uh either Bill Clinton or the Reverend Jackson.
Or maybe both.
NAALCP defending him claims race is behind the prosecution.
This is from the UK Daily Mail.
Leniency for spankings.
Pretty soon we're going to get an AP media critic writing on why this is one of the best things a judge has ever done to help reduce crime in America, just like this, the greatest hour of television that Letterman ever did, Admitting all the twists with the female staffers.
Now, as to who is Barack Obama, the mystery deepens.
The questions continue to be asked.
Greg Lewis at The American Thinker has a pretty hard-hitting piece here.
And the headline is this Did we elect a beta male as president?
We're all somewhat familiar with the body language that dogs display when they greet each other.
The dominant alpha male approaches directly, asserting his authority while the beta male genuflex crouches, tucks his tail, and may even end up on his back, exposing his neck in acquiescence, making sure the alpha male knows he has no intention of challenging him.
With his we will extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your fist, opening to the world's dictators at the UN, Obama is exhibiting classic beta male behavior, in essence, rolling over on his back, exposing his throat to him to make sure they know he has no intention of challenging their authority.
Of course, the problem is he's not simply exposing his throat.
He's just exposing America's collective throat, sending the message that he's a typical beta male intent on submitting to all the alpha male leaders around the world and damn the consequences.
His response to the discovery of Iran's newest and heretofore secret nuclear facility was, as Dan Henninger pointed out in the Wall Street Journal, to have our State Department offer to start a direct dialogue with a tyrannical Burmese regime.
Burma.
The Obama administration has also offered conciliatory gestures to the genocidal Sudanese leader, Omar Hassan el-Bashir, and has dispatched none other than John Kerry to meet with a Syrian leader, Basher Al-Assad.
This, of course, not to mention his somewhat more visible overtures to the world's alpha male thugs.
Obama's consorted jovially with Hugo Chavez and Daniel Ortega has bowed down to King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia.
He's agreed to halt plans to install a missile defense system in Eastern Europe to placate Putin, and he's offered the aforementioned hand to Mahmood Ahmadinezad, despite the latter's expressed unwillingness to even acknowledge the truly important issue of Iran's nuclear weapons in our talks.
All of this quit essential beta male behavior.
While we've all been seeking a political rationale for the president's actions, his behavior goes beyond the political to something deeper and more personal.
Like all beta males, Barack Obama simply doesn't have the temperament to confront tyrannical alpha males around the globe.
In this light, even his inability to work with American allies Gordon Brown and Nicholas Sarkozy is a function of his being incapable of facing down the world's tyrants.
To cooperate with our allies would require Obama to display alpha male behaviors, including demonstrating courage, something he's simply not capable of doing.
This gets harder hitting as I go on, as you can hear.
The president's beta male procli do you know this is a great way to describe the entire DC press corps?
Beta male.
Alanolda types, chicken by the feminizes.
Beta male proclivities are arguably putting the safety of his constituents, the citizens of our country in serious jeopardy.
Another cue to this unfortunate character trait of the president's can be found in the lack of assertiveness of his oratorical style.
While many people insist Obama's a wonderful speaker, in fact, he exhibits less emotional range when he addresses a crowd than did George W. Bush.
He may have better speech writers than W, but his delivery is monotonic.
His cadence is clipped, both signs of a beta male, unsure of himself, putting his words out there more for the purpose of seeking approval than of providing leadership.
Amen to that, bro.
To return to the canine metaphor, it is the height of folly to think that other nations won't be doing everything they can to make President Obama their bitch.
I got Wendy's attention in their reading People Magazine, and that line got her attention.
Greg Lewis, American thinker, co-author of End Your Addiction Now, his next book is The Politics of Anger, How Obama and Marxism's Heirs are redefining liberalism in America today.
Obama as the beta male.
I find that uh I find it fascinating.
Explains quite a bit.
All right, a brief timeout.
Fastest three hours, and maybe two of them are already gone.
We'll be back and continue in a second.
Another amazing story from the Associated Press, but this one's amazing because it actually is responsible.
It's by David Border, the uh lead TV writer for AP.
The headline, Will Women Viewers Turn Away from Letterman.
Did any other staffers feel the way they get ahead was through Letterman's bed?
Are women who didn't have intimate relations with Letterman upset that those who did may have gotten special treatment or career advances?
Is anybody talking to lawyers?
So far, and even today, two more stories about the women involved, and oh, what a great guy Dave is.
God would have married him tomorrow.
▲
Export Selection