All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 15, 2009 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:37
September 15, 2009, Tuesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The views expressed by the host on this program, now documented to be almost always right, 99.1% of the time.
Rush Limbaugh mistake-free every day here on the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
Great to have you with us.
Telephone number 800-282-2882, email address, lrushbo, EIBnet.com.
We have a news story from East St. Louis, Illinois.
A total of 13 firefighters and five other city employees will be laid off October 1st to help close a 2.9 million city budget deficit, said the mayor, Alvin Parks Jr.
He announced this yesterday.
The East St. Louis Firefighters Union president immediately responded that the firefighter layoffs would violate the contract between the city and its firefighters.
Jason Blackmun, the president of the Firefighters Local 23, said the union would move to block the layoffs of the firefighters, possibly through legal action.
Right now, they're in direct violation of contract, Blackmun said.
But Alvin Parks Jr., the mayor, determined that the layoffs are the best option now to balance the city budget.
The other layoffs he announced are three employees who help oversee the tax increment financing projects and two jobs in the regulatory and personnel departments that have been unfilled for several weeks.
He's going to eliminate jobs that haven't been filled.
So they're not even paying those people because there's nobody there.
Now, here's the thing.
There are probably 20 more worthless makework jobs that could go before the firefighters.
This is what they always do.
They always lay off the firefighters.
Next will be the cops.
They always lay off the first responders to get the citizens all worked up.
You know, it is East St. Louis.
It is East St. Louis, Illinois.
I mean, after we finish bulldozing Flint, take the bulldozers down to East St. Louis and have at it.
Well, I mean, if you're going to get rid of the firefighters, you're going to end up bulldozing a place anyway.
I mean, there's no place, no way to pull out the fires.
What else are I going to say?
Oh, I had a quick question.
Folks, serious question here.
I'm still struck by this story that ran over the weekend, the Boston Globe about Obama's relatives in the Green Paradise, Kenyon Village, waiving.
They've been waiting since 2004 for a little money from Obama.
He's got family that live there in huts.
And they're waiting.
Why, if you're Obama, why would, do you realize?
Just send 10 grand over there.
It's probably 10 times the annual village budget.
Do you realize what 10 grand could do?
Why not send the 10 grand and get rid of these stories that you are a cheapskate and a skin flint?
Why not do it?
No, I'm serious.
Do you not take care of your family when they're in trouble?
And this bunch has been waiving for five years.
This bunch, his grandmother or great-grandmother or step-grandmother, whatever it is, is just now having a water line run to her hut compound and an electricity line.
Water is still delivered by donkey to thatch huts to Obama's family members in Kenya.
Why not just send $10,000?
Especially when you listen to this first sound.
You want to hear some Marxism?
There's no other way to describe this.
I'll let you hear some Marxism.
This is Obama this afternoon in Pittsburgh at the AFL-CIO convention talking to his friends who has already bailed out.
Here's a portion of what he said.
And the fundamental test of this century, of our time, is whether we will heed this lesson, whether we will let America become a nation of the very rich and the very poor, of the haves and the have-nots, or whether we will remain true to the promise. of this country and build a future where the success of all of us is built on the success of each of us.
That's the future I want to build.
That's the future the AFL-CIO wants to build.
Now that's, folks, that's straight Marxism, and it's not true.
Says a country, well, no, it isn't true.
Build a future where the success of all of us is built on the success of each of us.
I mean, that's the fundamental test of the century is spread the wealth around, redistribute the wealth.
But the fact of the matter is, your success doesn't depend on anybody else's success.
It doesn't.
This is proven every day in this country.
Your success does not depend on everybody else.
Might depend on some others, but it doesn't depend on everybody.
We've proven this.
But let's take these words.
The success of all of us is built on the success of each of us.
He wants to build a nation like while his family members live in squalor in a village where water is still delivered by donkey to the thatched roof huts in which they live.
Here's the next sound bite we have from his remarks to the AFL-CIO pitch.
I refuse to let America go back to the culture of irresponsibility and greed that made it possible.
Back to an economy with soaring CEO salaries and shrinking middle-class incomes.
Back to the days when banks made reckless decisions that hurt Wall Street and Main Street alike.
We're not going to go back to those days.
It'd be bad for unions, bad for the middle class, and bad for the United States of America.
We're not turning back.
We're moving forward.
This guy's becoming a laughingstock.
This guy's becoming an insane laughingstock.
He has destroyed the middle class single-handedly.
He's in the process.
Do you know what the unemployment rate is?
And it's not Wall Street's fault.
It's Obama's fault.
It's Obama's policy's fault.
Unemployment rate is 9.7%.
It's heading toward 10%.
None of what he said would happen because of his policies has happened.
And by the way, this from Reuters, some of the largest U.S. banks will remain caught in the government's financial bailout program for months, as officials do not expect to grant the next wave of exit approvals until near the end of the year.
So Obama is publicly sending a message that banks are shedding government help, and yet he won't let them get out of the government.
He won't let them get back and be independent.
And he comes out with this nonsense.
And we're going to get back to the culture.
We're not going to go back to the culture of irresponsibility and greed that made it possible.
Back to an economy with soaring CEO salaries and shrinking middle-class incomes.
He's taking care of both.
Nobody's incomes are going to grow when this guy gets through.
Nobody's.
This is a dangerous guy, but he's becoming a laughingstock.
Let's listen to even more.
That's how we'll grow our great American middle class.
I love you too, sister.
Although it sounds like you've been hollering too much, your throat was all we're going to grow our middle class with policies that benefit you, the American workers.
Pray tell how does government do that?
How do you grow the middle class with policies that benefit you?
All you can do, I mean, the only answer to that is you just start taxing the achievers and you give it to people like this woman.
I love you.
I love you too, sister.
And here's the final soundbite whipping them into a frenzy over health care.
When are we going to say enough is enough?
How many more workers have to lose their coverage?
How many more families have to go into the red for a sick loved one?
How much longer are we going to have to wait?
It can't wait.
We can't wait.
My friends, we have talked this issue to death.
Year after year, decade after decade.
That's why I said last week, before a joint session of Congress, I said, the time for bickering is over.
The time for games has passed.
Now is the time for action.
Now is the time to deliver on health insurance reform.
Keep talking, Barack Buddy.
The more you talk, the more the polls go against you.
Keep talking.
Keep making speeches like this to your buddies, largely held accountable by the American people for many of the problems that we have here today.
Find a business in trouble and you will find a union involved.
You know what I'm thinking of doing?
Obama's not going to send any money to the village.
This isn't going to happen.
Yeah.
Let me think about this.
Yeah, yeah.
I can just, I can envision here the Rush Limbaugh wing of the Obama Family Museum.
I mean, people who donate get their names put on things, right?
Like, you know, the Mervyn whatever snerdly heart attack center at Presbyterian United Methodist Century Hospital or whatever.
It's true.
You get your name on things.
Hmm.
No, no, no.
My name would not go in a hut.
I would not tolerate my name on a hut.
I want to be, I want one of the donkeys named after me.
I want one of the donkeys delivering water to the Rush Limbaugh Water Express.
No, I don't think that would work either.
It opens it up to too much mockery.
But I'm seriously thinking about that.
We just need to find the channels necessary to do this.
The money is not the problem, unlike it apparently is for Obama.
Maybe, maybe what Obama could do is bring some of the Acorn buddies into the White House and get some tax advice on how he could send them the money and get a whole refund from the IRS for doing so.
Maybe just maybe set up, you know, the, what's that place out in Vegas, the Money Ranch?
You know, if you set up the whole village as a brothel, you know, using Acorn funding.
I mean, it doesn't have to actually be one.
You just say it is.
And that way, because these babes at Acorn are professionals.
I don't want to go through Aunt Zatuti.
I don't know that Aunt Zatuti would be forthcoming with me.
We'll have to go through.
I know people.
Don't worry about that.
I know people.
I know ways to get this done.
The Rush Limbaugh wing of the Obama Family Museum.
What could it possibly cost to break ground and start laying the foundation?
And the Obama Family Museum has to, you know, it can't be an architectural disaster.
It has to look like the rest of the town.
So you're basically talking about building a hut, a multi-hut museum with fancy drew.
How expensive can that be?
Yeah, and because they've got an unspeakable post office.
The guy writing the story in the Boston Gloves is a post office.
What was his word?
What was his term?
Nothing to speak of.
What's unspeakable about a post office?
No priority mail.
Well, I don't think anybody sends mail to the place anyway.
But don't worry, we have ways of getting this done.
And I do my share, charitable giving.
Most of it never is known.
or would be known.
Uh, yeah.
All right.
My mind is exploding here, folks, with the neurons are firing.
I've got ideas bursting forth here.
My skull can barely contain them.
Let's go back to the phones.
Deborah, in what is this, Boswell?
Doswell, Virginia.
Hi, welcome to the EIB Network.
Hey, Rush.
If you remember me, I'm the Barbara Lady.
And as you know, I deal in facts, not suppositions.
And I have three kids in their mid-20s.
And more than 25 years ago, I learned through the research of companies like Johnson ⁇ Johnson and articles published in the Journal of the American Medical Association that newborns and young children respond to images that are presented in black and white.
It has to do with the development of the cones and rods and their eyeballs.
And they first respond to black and white images.
So newborns are not, newborns and six-month-olds are not racist.
They're simply responding to how their eyes develop.
Wrong.
Newsweek says they're racists.
Well, I'm sorry, right?
Newsweek is the Obama administration.
Newsweek is state-controlled media.
And they say by six months, it's too late, and the parents can't do anything to stop it.
Well, that's not the case because my kids looked at black and white images to attune themselves to being able to move their home.
Yeah, but see, here's the thing.
What's black to somebody is white to somebody else.
Well, can I say one other thing?
Yeah.
Okay.
Well, unlike Obama, through the Christian Children's Fund, I support a young lady in Angola whose name is Evelina.
And through my contributions, her family has been able to put a new roof on their house, chairs and other things in their home, and feed the young lady and educate her.
Right.
And what did all this cost?
$24, the same price in Manhattan.
There you go.
Really, when you're talking about these countries, it doesn't take that much money.
That's the point.
No, it doesn't.
And you can make a significant difference in their lives.
Huge.
I mean, the percentage increases is incalculable to them.
It's like winning a lottery.
That's why we'd have to send those lottery babes that, you know, people at Council Lottery winners.
We have to send somebody over there to make sure that they don't blow the donation in the first six months.
Right.
And so neither are our children racist, nor Are we racist?
Because there are so many people who contribute through organizations like the Christian Children's Fund to companies or to countries like Africa that Obama doesn't have any leg to stand on.
Well, I don't know.
I mean, I just, I know what you're saying sounds right, that we're a decent good country, but I'm hearing every day that we're racist.
I mean, Newsweek says it, Obama says it, the drive-by media is saying that any opposition to Obama criticism is racist.
Maybe we just have to face it.
We're born that way.
It ought to be something, you know, just like I said, I mean, it's a serious thing we've got to consider.
If homosexuality, if you're born that way, if it's inborn, it's not a choice.
And that is why it must be acceptable.
Then why must not racism be acceptable by the same definition since it's inborn?
We're born that way.
We don't choose it.
If we don't choose it, it can't possibly be a bad thing.
Right?
Thanks for the call out there, Deborah.
This is Lou Ann in Jacksonville, Florida.
Welcome to the EIB Network.
Hello.
Hi, how are you today?
Very well.
Thank you.
Good.
Hey, I'd like to make a comment that you made earlier on the acorn tax preparers.
Yes.
Well, you know what?
You are exactly right.
And I hope everybody out there realizes that the upper class of people do pay the majority of taxes, and those rarely cheat on their taxes.
I am a certified tax preparer, and not that I am a fan of the IRS, but had I been able to bust these people, I sure would have.
I saw daily people coming in and actually sharing children where they didn't even have the child's social security number.
They had them written on paper napkins, backup envelopes, didn't know the child's middle.
Hold on a second here.
You are confirming that it is the poor who are the tax cheats in this country.
The poor in the middle class, not the rich.
Well, the Acorn babes, look at everybody thinks it's the rich who are the tax cheats and have all the lawyers, people like you, to advise them around how to cheat.
You don't advise them how to cheat.
You just know the law and you tell them how to file taxes according to law to limit what they pay.
But the Acorn babes are helping people cheat on their taxes.
We always thought it was the rich doing this.
Oh, let me tell you.
And me personally, in the offices that I have worked in, we are not allowed by law to tell them anything or tell them that they are breaking the law.
We have to say you might be audited by the IRS.
Now, of course, what I have done is I haven't, there's been times where I haven't even.
Wait a second.
Why can't you tell them they're breaking the law?
We're not allowed.
By who?
Who doesn't allow you?
By the companies that we have worked for.
We're not allowed to say that.
We are not lawyers.
We are not, we don't, we're not allowed to portray the law to them.
We can advise them that, are you sure this is what you want to do?
And in the notes on their tax return.
What, is your company afraid of offending them or something?
What is this?
Most of them are.
Most of them, most of the people, yes, absolutely they are.
Where, you know, you have, and apparently, social services, HRS, the Welfare Department, they do not communicate with the IRS because here's one example.
I had a gentleman that came in.
He had a Social Security number written on a corner of an envelope.
He did not even know this child's middle name, which we have to have, either that the middle initial.
He was on the phone making phone calls, making sure the Social Security number was right.
Now, what we found out, the person, these people, let's say you have a lower-income single mom who has three children.
Now, if she's collecting.
All right, I got to stop you because I have an obscene profit break here.
But hold your thought there.
I want to hear the end of this.
Okay, we're back, and we want to go back to Lou Ann in Jacksonville, Florida.
All right, so the guy came in.
He's got the Social Security number in a corner of an envelope.
He doesn't know the name of the kid.
Correct.
Making phone calls, you know, trying to find out the correct information on the child.
And of course, by that time, you know that this isn't his child.
Of course, it turns out to be his niece who moved in with him the last few months of the year.
And by law, if a child or someone has lived with you the last six months of the year, you can claim them for the full year.
And what these people do is, like I was saying before, you have this single parent who has a couple of children, who, let's say, is on welfare, food stamps, and they don't have, per se, an income, an income from anybody.
They'll give a child, basically, to somebody they know to collect taxes, a tax refund, as they call it, which it's hard for me to say.
You can't have a refund if you don't give, right?
I am sitting here.
I'm heartbroken, stunned, and shocked.
America's poor are gaming and cheating the IRS.
America's poor.
Listen to me.
There's thousands and thousands of dollars that me personally saw go out.
Thousands and thousands to people who don't get it.
After talking to my, when I talked to my kids, telling them what I was seeing, they would say, yeah, mom, we see it all the time.
We hear it all the time.
People so-and-so over in this part of given this, where they would give, say, let's say if I was a parent, well, what they would do if Joe Schmo got back or got back, but received an extra $1,500 in taxes, Joe Schmo would then split it with the person whose child it really belonged to.
Shocking.
It's absolutely shocking, my friend.
It's horrific.
It's horrific.
And I don't know what I don't know whether to go back and continue.
I'm what you call a rule follower, and I am following the rules, and it's not my responsibility by law.
You only have one choice, and that's to send these people over to Acorn.
I'm sure.
Here's an Acorn office in Jacksonville, and you don't want any part of this.
It happens all the time.
There are, let's say, if there's 100 people that come in the office, I guarantee you, 25 of them are tax cheats.
25 of them.
And they're not the upper middle and upper class.
When I get the upper middle end, they have everything laid out, every insurance policy, everything they've ever done.
They've got a folder.
How much do you charge these people for assisting them?
Well, and that's it.
It goes by a percentage of what their refund is.
Oh, my God.
So you're a co-conspirator.
Not me.
I pass them off.
No, but the company is.
If you won't tell these people, if you won't tell it, if the company won't let you tell these people you're cheating, and you go ahead and they go ahead and file a return this way, you're a co-conspirator unindicted yet.
Man.
Not me.
The company is.
I can't do it.
I told them I can't do this.
I cannot.
I give them to somebody else or I refer them to somebody else.
And most people, when you see that they're doing it, they won't handle it either.
Back in 1989 or 90, I did a poignant commentary on how we need to raise taxes on the rich.
Little did we know.
Raise taxes on the poor.
We need to raise taxes on the poor.
Little did I know how poignant that was.
That's 20 years ago.
Thank you, Lou Ann.
I appreciate it.
Ladies and gentlemen, Obama is making three speeches today.
He has now booked on Letterman and five Sunday shows.
He's doing every Sunday show but Fox News Sunday.
I kid you not, three speeches today.
And speaking of the speech today, why is this guy having to whip up support like this with his best supporters who have already been stimulated with stimulus money?
Why is he giving this kind of speech now?
The tone, the need to talk to a union crowd.
Is he down to just the union kook thugs that'll cheer him now?
Does he think he's losing them too?
There's nothing bipartisan about what he's doing.
I mean, this is incredible.
Now, this is like Castro.
I'm not saying this half-heartedly or lackadaisically.
Five television shows this Sunday.
Letterman, he's booked on three speeches today.
You know what?
That's a great question.
When does he work?
You know what I would do?
You know what I would do if I were Fox News Sunday?
I would get a shrink.
I would go get a psychiatrist.
I'd have a panel of psychiatrists with the topic being, why does Obama need to be on television every minute of every day?
There has never been a president like this.
This need, this hunger to be on television every minute, to be on the cover of every magazine.
This is a lust that is sick.
We've never had a, this is like Castro.
Castro gives five-minute speeches, five-hour speeches.
Obama's doing the same thing today in three different locations, a total of five hours of speeches or what have you, to his buddies.
And when you listen to the sound bites we played, I mean, it didn't, it didn't.
A campaign speech to union supporters.
Odd, odd speech, odd tone at this point in time.
We can't wait.
They can't wait.
It's hard now.
For four years, we're going to implement this.
Not for four years.
We've got to get it done now.
And then the chants coming along.
I mean, I'm reminded of things that I want to mention here when I hear these crowds.
Five Sunday shows, every one of them but Fox and Letterman, which, of course, that's going to be a kiss-ass episode.
I mean, that's going to be that's going to induce vomiting.
All those other Sunday shows are going to be the same thing.
It'll be vomit-inducing.
People are going to be hurling all over the country on Sunday morning if they watch this garbage.
And meanwhile, over on Fox, you know, I go out, I get Jackie Mason in there and Raul Felder, and a panel of shrinks, a panel of psychiatrists, to analyze why, you know, clearly state, look, we haven't seen the president as a patient, but we are highly trained in the field of neuropsychosis.
And we do want to endeavor to explain here just why this man has this unquenchable thirst and lust to be on television all the time.
Especially, especially when it has especially why he has to do this when it's known that the more he's on TV, the worse his numbers get.
And, you know, as a subtopic, you know, I'd have the shrinks explore also why it is that Obama refuses to help his family living in a village where water is still delivered on donkeyback.
His family been waiting for money since 2004.
He's taking money from everybody else and giving it to everybody else, but not to his family.
The rudder George Obongo on Yango Obama living in the hut, six by nine.
Hadn't even sent a sign.
Hut, sweet hut.
Did you watch the football game last night?
You know, by the way, I have to, I have to, I have to praise ESPN because I have been a vocal critic of ESPN's televised football game coverage in the past.
They never kept the cameras on the field.
All they did was promote whatever was coming up later in the week on ESPN, put some idiot celebrities in the booth, chat to them about nonsense.
They kept the cameras on the field last night.
And the Patriots, you could hear Brady barking signals last night better than I have ever heard at a football game on television, the quarterback barking signals.
Now, the crowd helped by shutting up so that the offensive line could hear the calls and so forth.
But every time Brady said, hut, you know, I kept thinking of Kenya.
And he'd say, $130, hut!
I'm saying, nope, not $1.30, not nothing.
It's just hut.
Anyway, that's my idea.
That's what I think Fox ought to do.
I would love to be on Fox this Sunday, but I'm going to be in Washington, but I can't do the show.
And I'm not a psychiatrist, although I can explain everything that's happening.
Still pondering here, ladies and gentlemen, because it is a big mystery why it is that Obama refuses to help his brother in Kenya living in the hut and why he doesn't, the family been waiting with their hands out for four, well, five years since 2004, since he was first elected to the U.S. Senate.
Not a penny, nothing.
And we're sitting here trying to think why.
And one thing is, obviously, there's no magic in helping family members overseas.
Maybe it's racism.
No, no, no, I'm serious.
Obama is half white.
Maybe his half-white side is to blame here.
The family's.
Well, look, I'm at the bottom of the barrel here trying to come up with logical explanations here.
And I'm just going on Newsweek that we're all born racist.
And Obama had a typical white grandmother.
I mean, his own words, maybe the half-white side's winning out here.
A dual battle going on inside the cranium there.
You know, I had an epiphany, folks.
For those of you in Rio Linda, Port St. Lucie, an epiphany, sudden intuitive leap of understanding.
This happens to me all the time.
There's not really a big deal when it happens.
But this particular epiphany was this.
I've been telling you how Carbonite safely, securely, automatically backs up your hard drive off-site whenever you're connected to the internet, and it does.
But here's what Carbonite's really all about.
Forget the process here.
What it's really all about is, let's say you accidentally delete some files from your computer, or maybe it gets damaged, or it crashes, or it gets stolen.
Then you got fear.
Fear creeps in and get mad, mad at yourself that you let it happen, that you didn't back up.
But then you remember, no, you did back up.
You took my advice.
You got Carbonite Online back up in a few simple steps.
Your files are restored by Carbonite.
Now you're feeling joy.
What started out as fear is joy.
And believe me, it's going to happen to you.
If you use a computer and you haven't backed it up, do it with Carbonite online off-site backup.
$55 a year at carbonite.com.
Get a genuine 15-day free trial if you use offer code RUSH.
And you also get two free months if you decide to buy.
So it's actually not $55 a year.
Carbonite.com, offer code Rush.
Mr. Stergley, you look like you're chomping at the bit to say something in there.
No?
All right.
Well, back to the phone.
Oh, one more thing here before we go to the phones.
New York City's workplace smoking ban six years ago drove cigarette and cigar puffers outdoors.
Soon, some of the outdoors may be off limits too.
The city's health commissioner, Dr. Thomas Farley, said yesterday that he would seek a ban on smoking at city parks and beaches outside.
Boy, I tell you, New York smokers are so screwed.
What is it, $10 a pack now?
$11 a pack, and now you can't smoke them anymore.
What the hell do they expect to happen with all the tax revenue being generated by this?
The mayor was caught short by this.
Monday night, the mayor issued a statement that did not disavow the proposal, but appeared to qualify it, saying he wanted to see if smoking in parks has a negative impact on people's health.
Does smoking in parks...
How about standing outside while one of your buses goes by?
The mayor said it may not be logistically possible to enforce a ban across thousands of acres, but there may be areas within parks where restricting smoking can protect health.
And showerheads may harbor bacteria dangerous to some people.
Put this on the list of some people, the things that could kill us.
How many showerheads do you have, Snerdley, in your house?
Two?
Three.
Well, in what may be the scariest shower news since Psycho, a study says that showerheads can harbor tiny bacteria that come spraying into your face when you wash.
There's a companion story here, too, that kids are being told to use the alcohol-based hand sanitizer, but then there's a story that says, no, no, no, no, that's dangerous.
You should use soap and water.
So there's a conflict here over how to wash your hands in schools.
Showerheads, the next thing for you to be frightened of.
Philadelphia, Dan, welcome to the EIB network.
Hello.
Hi.
Hi.
I asked Senator Casey's office to explain his vote on the ACORN funding.
And I was told that he didn't vote to give them funding.
He voted not to take it away because he wants to see what happens in this next week.
Now, there's two serious problems with that.
The first one is that it's the same thing.
Voting to give them funding and voting not to take it away.
Senator Casey, we know that he's an order of fries short of a happy meal.
So you're.
He actually said, I didn't vote to give them funding.
I voted not to take it away.
Yes.
And he said that.
Yes.
But the thing is, he voted for the stimulus package.
And Acorn gets stimulus money.
So that's a lie right there.
And when I asked his representative, who couldn't get off script, I said, now, why do they deserve to get money?
And he was completely dumbfounded, stuttering, saying, well, Acorn puts communities where they're needed.
And I just stopped him.
And I went on to summarize for this uninformed automaton that all the corruption going on within Acorn.
And I asked, why would they risk all this taxpayer money on such a controversial organization?
Actually believe, because Casey's elevator doesn't go to the top floor.
I actually believe that he believes that Acorn's out there helping poor people get housing and food stamps.
I think look at Charlie Gibson doesn't even know about the story and Charlie Gibson's elevator gets closer to the top floor than Bob Casey's does.
Yeah, here it is.
New Jersey, screw all district to mandate hand sanitizing.
Teachers ordered to monitor cleaning of hands in morning, before and after lunch in every restroom visit in New Jersey.
Now what's a parent supposed to do?
Because there are a lot of people out there that say that hand sanitizers are dangerous for children because you use them all the time and you build up an immunity to any germs out there.
So now the school's mandating hand sanitizers and with teachers watching over every hand washing in the in the in the Every restroom visit in the morning, before and after lunch.
▲
Export Selection