All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 7, 2009 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:26
September 7, 2009, Monday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Well, it's Monday and I'm here.
How about that?
And five full days straight ahead.
Great to have you with us, folks.
Rush Limbaugh and EIB Network and the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Great to be with you.
Here's the telephone number, 800-282-2882 and the email address, lrushball at eivnet.com.
Got a couple of headlines.
Actually, two headlines and a story.
This is from thehill.com analysis.
It's by Sam Youngman.
July has been disaster for Obama and Hill Democrats.
After the climate bill passed 219 at 212 on the afternoon of June 26th, there was a feeling that the White House could get much of its agenda through Congress in 2009.
A month later, there are doubts that President Obama will even achieve his number one priority of health care reform, much less cap and trade, immigration reform, and irregularity.
You believe this?
I mean, if July's been a disaster, when I love that headline, I hope August is terrifying.
And this Gates business, you know, there's a press conference in Cambridge, right?
They're going to do a committee.
Cambridge is going to form a commission to study what it is.
Do you know why Obama went?
By the way, we now know why Obama went to the press room on Friday afternoon to shut this down.
Because they were going to have hearings in Congress.
Congress was ready to convene hearings on the racism that had happened up there and this whole Gates problem.
And they didn't want hearings on this at the White House.
They didn't want to, you know, that's another obstacle in the way of the agenda.
So it's hilarious.
But folks, as I told you all last week, this is not a time to start getting giddy or celebratory because fighting these people is a daily thing for the rest of our lives.
They are always going to be here.
I want to restate a point I made on Friday.
I wish I had made this point in the interview with Greta Van Sustran.
Oh, by the way, did you see the ratings for Thursday?
I haven't seen Friday.
Thursday night, she owned it.
Thursday night, she owned it.
Highest ratings in cable news.
In the 10 o'clock hour for Greta.
I was very proud of that.
But one of the things I wish I had told her in this whole discussion that we have here about the encroaching size of government and the designs that Obama has on the economy.
And by the way, before, let me give you one more little bit of evidence.
Front page of the Wall Street Journal today.
Banks are not lending.
I mean, who's going to borrow?
According to Obama and his staff, businesses need to borrow to meet payroll.
But banks don't lend for payroll.
They might lend for inventory buildup if there's a market, and they might lend if you want to expand the business, but nobody's expanding.
And they're not lending to consumers.
Consumers are afraid, and the banks are afraid of lending.
So all of this is so predictable.
Nobody who wants economic growth would be doing what Obama and his people are doing.
That's why I keep saying it's purposeful.
Now, you know, I checked email over the weekend and people, even in this audience, Rush, that's a little harsh.
You're not going to persuade anybody by telling this is purposeful.
I don't know how else to tell you, folks.
One of the thing I wish I'd said on Greta that I said Friday I want to repeat now is one of the best points that anybody could make in describing the uniqueness and greatness of this country.
Do you realize that the history of the world is tyranny?
The history of the world is dictatorship.
The history of the world is dungeons and torture chambers.
That's why this country is so unique.
And there are people, it's just part of human nature for people who desire to have power over other people.
And there are people in this country who are Americans who have the same view of totalitarianism that all the worst regimes of the world have had.
They just are a minority or have been a minority.
And they have to be stealth to get anywhere because who's going to vote for torture?
Who's going to vote for tyranny?
Who's going to vote for dictatorship?
But we did.
We did.
And you see it slowly encroaching.
And if they could move faster on this, they would.
But it's just, it's why this country is so special and so unique in all of human history, because it was founded on the exact opposite pretense and purpose, individual liberty and freedom.
A constitution that tells the government what it cannot do to us and to the citizens.
And of course, Obama and his buds think of the Constitution as consisting of negative rights, meaning it doesn't say what the government can do for us or to us.
Now, the second story that I was going to mention here, the first headline was funny.
This is from Money, Money Magazine, CNN, Money.com.
Five Freedoms You Would Lose in Healthcare Reform.
If you read the fine print in the congressional plans, you'll find that a lot of cherished aspects of the current system would disappear.
This is by Sean Tully, editor-at-large at a Time Warner publication, Money Magazine.
You have to go to the CNN website to get, I'm stunned that this appears anywhere near the CNN logo, website, whatever.
In promoting his healthcare agenda, President Obama has repeatedly reassured Americans they can keep their existing health plans and that the benefits and access they prize will be enhanced through reform.
But a close reading of the two main bills, the House and Senate, contradict the president's assurances.
To be sure, it isn't easy to comb through the 2,000 pages of tortured legal language, page by page.
The bills reveal a web of restrictions, fines, and mandates that would radically change your health care coverage.
Here's number one, the five freedoms that you would lose according to CNNmoney.com.
Number one, freedom to choose what's in your plan.
The bills in both houses, the House and the Senate, require that Americans purchase insurance through qualified, that's in quotes, plans offered by healthcare exchanges that would be set up in each state.
The rub is that the plans can't really compete based on what they offer.
The reason the federal government will oppose a minimum list of benefits that each plan is required to offer.
Connecticut, for example, requires reimbursement for hair transplants, hearing aids, and in vitro fertilization.
Many states require these standard benefits package, and they're a major cause for the rise in healthcare costs along with tort reform.
The number two freedom you would lose, they say, freedom to be rewarded for healthy living or pay your real costs.
As with the previous example, Obama enshrines into federal law one of the worst features of state legislation, community rating.
11 states ranging from New York to Oregon have some form of community rating.
In its purest form, community rating requires that all patients pay the same rates for their level of coverage regardless of their age or medical condition.
Americans with pre-existing conditions need subsidies under any plan, but community rating is a dubious way to bring fairness to health.
The reason is twofold.
First, it forces young people who typically have lower incomes than older workers to pay far more than their actual cost and gives older workers who can afford to pay more a big discount.
Second, the bills would ban insurers from charging different premiums based on the health of their customers.
Can you believe?
That's like having a good driving record getting you no break on your auto insurance premium.
So all this talk about we're going to live healthier and we're going to mandate this and mandate that to lower costs, which by the way, we've cut smoking in half and where are the savings?
They don't exist.
The third freedom, freedom to choose high deductible coverage.
You're going to lose that.
The bills threaten to eliminate the one part of the market truly driven by consumers spending their own money.
That's what makes a market.
And healthcare needs more of it, not less.
So if you want a high deductible coverage, you're not going to be able to do that.
That would lower your premium, by the way, but you're not going to be able to.
Number four, freedom to keep your existing plan.
This is the freedom that the president keeps emphasizing, yet the bills appear to say otherwise.
It's worth diving into the weeds, a territory where most pundits and politicians don't seem to have ventured.
You will lose your health care plan under his plan.
And five, freedom to choose your doctors.
The Senate bill requires that Americans buying through the exchanges in each state must get their care through something called medical home.
Medical home is similar to an HMO.
You're assigned a primary care doctor, and the doctor controls your access to specialists.
And the last couple sentences of this piece, for now we suffer with a flawed health care system, but we still have our five freedoms.
Call them the five endangered freedoms.
There's a lot more than just these five that we're going to lose.
And now the Democrats, this is the AP, Democrats alone can't deliver Obama health care.
President Obama needs Republican votes.
Democratic GOP officials acknowledged Sunday that Obama's ambitious plan would not pass without the aid of a doubtful GOP whose members are almost united against the White House effort.
Well, let me tell you something.
If you add up the numbers, if the Democrats are unified, they can't be stopped.
They do not need Republicans.
If they need Republicans, it's because there's a problem with the Democrats.
And this is such a glorious, good-time political opportunity.
If they had a bad July, let's make August miserable for them.
There's no reason to do any of this ever.
Not in two weeks, not in two months, not in two years.
There is no reason to ever enact a health care reform bill like this into law.
Quick timeout.
We'll be back and continue after this.
It's just comical.
It's coming.
The White House and the state-run media want so badly to blame all of Obama's problems on Bush or on the Republican Party.
And what's really funny is that their real enemies, their real problem is in their own party.
And those wonks, the CBO.
The CBO has come out and said it's even worse than we thought with Obama's health plan.
There are no savings whatsoever.
Is after Obama dragged the CBO director up to the White House, which is a no-no.
The guy's supposed to be independent.
He's dragged up to the White House.
Obama had a chat with him after he put out the report that the deficit would be $249 billion with Obama's health plan.
And so they come back and to reassert this guy's independence.
The Democrats run the CBO.
He comes back and says, by the way, there aren't any savings in this health care plan.
So it's Obama's own party that is providing all the problems.
Democrats, the CBO, who would have thought, who would have thought that they might be the ones to save this country?
Because the Republicans don't have the votes to do it.
This bears watching.
I'll tell you what, this is so why.
This is so why they're going to try to force a vote in the House on this before the recess because they know what's going to happen when members of Congress head home for the recess.
And by the way, I like that term recess for a congressional vacation.
Recess is what you help little kids do.
You're taking time out from school.
Speaking of members of Congress, John Conyers is from Cybercast News Service.
During his speech at a National Press Club luncheon, the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, John Conyers, questioned the point of lawmakers reading the health care bill.
I love these members.
They get up and say, read the bill, Conyers said.
What good is reading the bill if it's a thousand pages and you don't have two days and two lawyers to find out what it means after you read the bill?
This is a chairman of a Democrat committee who's basically saying, we can't read the bill.
We don't understand it when we read it unless, well, how many lawyers do you think there are in Congress?
Maybe 200?
Who do you think is writing these bills?
Lawyers and staff?
200 lawyers right down the hall, Mr. Conyers.
A lot of them in your own party.
This is stunning.
No point in members reading the health care bill unless they have a couple lawyers to interpret it for them.
And he's saying this publicly.
This is their July's not over, and it's horrifying.
Tim Geithner, Treasury Secretary, pledged the United States will shrink its budget deficit over the next four years and boost national savings.
He called on the CHICOMs to maintain efforts to ease the impact of the global recession.
He said, we are committed to taking measures to maintaining greater personal saving and to reducing the federal deficit to a sustainable level by 2013.
Can I translate this for you?
What Timothy Geithner has just promised the Chikoms is: don't worry about us.
We're going to be raising taxes here.
We're going to close the deficit, and all these massive tax increases are not going to hurt our economy.
Man, I'll tell you, it's begging hat in hand to the Chikoms, El Rushball, all over the media over the weekend.
Friday night, PBS, Bill Moyer's journal, he said this about the fairness doctrine.
Some of you remember the fairness doctrine adopted 60 years ago by the Federal Communications Commission.
It said that opposing points of view had to be presented on radio or TV in a way that was honest, equitable, and balanced.
If not, said the FCC, a station could lose its license.
Ronald Reagan abolished the doctrine in 1987, but mention it today, and the Rush Limbaughs of the world still scream like martyrs being stretched on the rack.
These people earn millions inciting riots in the public mind.
If they were required to be fair, they would soon be penniless out on the street, cup in hand.
Now, remember, he's one of the brightest guys on the left.
And that's just absurd.
That is just insane.
Creating riots in the public mind, riots in the public mind.
If they, meaning me, if I were required to be fair, I would be penniless.
As though he sits there as a paragon of virtue on fairness, one of the We're watching a literal crackup.
We're watching a literal crackup.
You know, it's, I don't know how long it's going to go, and I don't know if it's going to be completed.
But when these people get their unbridled power and things still don't go right, I mean, Mr. Moyers, there's nothing I can do to stop anybody from doing anything.
I can't raise their taxes.
I can't send anybody off to war.
I can't tell them who their doctor's going to be.
I can't tell them what kind of car they have.
I have no power.
I have Zilch Zeronada.
Riots in the public mind.
And last Friday night on MSNBC, they had a guest host in there, Richard Wolf, interviewing the White House press secretary, Robert Gibbs.
Question.
Rush Limbaugh says this is all about ethnic politics, the Gates business.
He even compared the president to the prosecutor and a Duke.
Oh, that got him so upset all day long.
When I call him Barack Nyphong, that sent MSNB, I mean, a couple people over there had to go into heart surgery.
So I'm calling Barack Nyphong, and they don't like to even compare the president to the prosecutor Duke Rait case today.
He said the president was playing the race card.
How do you respond to somebody with a bullhorn who's trying to stoke racial fears and resentment?
The president wants to have constructive dialogue with people that clearly want to have constructive dialogue on issues that are as important as race.
Whether or not Rush Limbaugh wants to be part of a constructive dialogue or whether he wants to get ratings to sell commercials on a radio show, I'll let him answer that question.
Rush has paid a lot of money to fan the flames, again, so he can sell advertising on his radio show.
I don't think that's what's important.
I think what's important is, obviously, these are important issues.
They have been over the lifetime in the history of our country, and the president takes them seriously and wants to deal with them seriously.
I think that's what it's going to take.
I think that very few of our issues are going to be solved yelling at each other on talk radio.
Now, am I correct?
Did I hear that I'm fanning the flames?
And I'm doing it to sell advertising.
I heard the White House press secretary say that.
Who started all of this?
Fanning the flames?
His boss, the President of the United States, Mr. Gibbs and Mr. Wolf of MSNBC have it exactly backwards if they blame anybody, especially me, for what the president did.
Thank you.
And I know.
800-282-2882, if you want to be on the program here, we have the audio of John Conyers.
It's last Friday at the National Press Club.
Now, folks, I must, I'm going to be honest with you, I didn't know until doing show prep today that Conyers had said this on Friday.
And I only saw it because I checked out the Cybercast news service.
I didn't see it in any state-run media.
Did you?
Did you guys hear about this over the weekend?
It was a shock to everybody, right?
Here's what he said again.
I love these members that get up and say, read the bill.
What good is reading the bill if it's a thousand pages and you don't have two days and two lawyers to find out what it means after you read the bill.
That's in a luncheon speech at the National Press Club in Washington last Friday.
What good does it do to read the bill if you don't have a couple lawyers to find out what it means after you read it?
This guy is chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.
So sometimes it's just best to get out of their way and just let them go ahead and make fools of themselves.
Mr. Moyers, by the way, I'm sorry for creating a riot in the public mind here by publicizing what Congressman Conyers said.
I guess this is what Mr. Moyers would accuse me of doing, right?
Creating a riot in the public mind.
I should not have played this, nor should I have read the story of what Mr. Conyer said, right?
Well, because, you know, I'm fanning the flames, according to the White House press secret.
What do you mean, people?
The liberals used to tell us people have a right to know, but apparently not this.
I'll bet you this is fanning the flames, Gibbs says, and Moyers will create a riot in the public mind.
They didn't report this.
They did not report it.
And it was on, obviously, C-SPAN.
Sarah Palin closed out her career as governor of Alaska yesterday.
We have three sound bites of her remarks.
You have such important jobs, reporting facts and informing the electorate and exerting power to influence.
You represent what could and should be a respected, honest profession that could and should be a cornerstone of our democracy.
Democracy depends on you.
And that is why our troops are willing to die for you.
So, how about in honor of the American soldier, you quit making things up.
And don't underestimate the wisdom of the people.
Now, what elected official do you hear talking that way to the media about the media?
There's a reason why this woman drew huge crowds during the campaign last summer and into last fall.
And she's exactly right.
I mean, they've met their Waterloo, as I said last week, and it's Barack Obama.
They have sacrificed integrity, whatever little they had, their character, their professionalism, to prop this guy and his administration up.
They are stenographers for Rob Emmanuel.
They're propagandists for the White House and increasingly the Democrat Party at large.
Here, Sarah Palin warns Alaska to resist big government.
We must value and live the optimistic pioneering spirit that made the state proud and free.
And we can resist enslavement to big central government that crushes hope and opportunity.
Be wary of accepting government largesse.
It doesn't come free.
And often accepting it takes away everything that is free.
Melting into Washington's powerful, caretaking arms will just suck incentive to work hard and chart our own course right out of us.
And that not only contributes to an unstable economy and dizzying national debt, but it does make us less free.
Is there another elected official talking that way about big government?
Sadly, no.
This next bite's one of my favorites.
Please let's not start believing that government is the answer.
It can't make you happy or healthy or wealthy or wise.
What can?
It is the wisdom of the people and our families and our small businesses and industrious individuals.
And it is God's grace helping those who help themselves.
And then this allows that very generous, voluntary hand up that we're known for enthusiastically providing those who need it.
That is, that's good.
Government can't make you happy or healthy or wealthy or wise.
Is there an elected official saying these things?
Now, remember, we've got all kinds of people on our side thinking this woman's stupid.
She's an idiot.
She's unsophisticated and so forth.
I'm always asked what I think of Sarah Palin.
Greta asked me on the interview, and I will play the sound bite of what I said, the question, from an ideology point of view, do you think, who do you think is the smartest or best candidate in your mind right now?
I'm looking right now at who can win, and I look at who excites crowds.
And I also, I think, Greta, that the state-run media and the Democrat Party will go a long way in telling us who they are most afraid of.
And I don't think they're afraid of Mike Huckabee, because they never talk about him.
I don't think they're afraid of Mitt Romney much, although if he surfaces, they'll go after his religion again.
But they're trying to destroy Sarah Palin.
They're literally trying to destroy not just her career, but her reputation.
Now, if they're not worried about Sarah Palin, why do this?
I think they, the Democrats, telling us who right now they are most afraid of, who they think can beat Obama.
It's not hard to understand why.
You covered Palin a lot during the campaign.
Largest crowds on the Republican side, the most enthusiasm.
People were revved up and fired up, in some cases, even more than Obama rallies.
And the Obama rallies were just culpy.
They were just showing up to be part of the story.
They didn't care what Obama was saying.
It says he was Obama.
Sarah Palin was exciting people on substance.
Now, to illustrate my point about the media and their fear of Sarah Palin, let's go to MSNBC Live.
The anchor Carlos Watson speaking with the White House correspondent Nora O'Donnell and the Financial Times Christia Freeland about Governor Palin.
They had this exchange.
We talked in the 90s a good deal about the angry white male and angry white men.
Instead of the face of that maybe being a Rush Limbaugh, that the face of it could become a Sarah Palin.
Interesting to me.
What's your take on her political opportunities in the near term?
No doubt.
Yesterday, these lines were tough.
They would never make it in a general election campaign.
But to her supporters, it was exactly the kind of political red meat that people love.
It's the kind of red meat that her supporters love.
It's the kind of red meat that has gained her some 13,000 people that have made small donations that have helped her bank this more than a million dollars.
So you betcha, she's got a political future.
You betcha she's going to be out there traveling around.
Now they're starting to make fun of her.
You betcha.
You betcha.
They're clearly worried.
And they're reviving the angry white.
Once again, another prediction I made.
We have a black president and racism is going to be exacerbated.
It's not going to get better.
It's not going to go away.
We're not going to get rid of our original sin.
Said all that during the campaign.
And now look, now she's an angry white woman.
Now they're bringing her race into this, replacing me as the angry white guy, which, of course, was a myth.
It's just how they tried to characterize people that were opposing them, who had success.
So you listen to that.
They will tell you who they're really afraid of, by who they try to destroy, who they criticize, who they keep talking about.
And they're worried about her.
And making fun of her and so forth.
It's going to be interesting to see all this fall out.
I got to go.
Quick timeout.
We'll come back, grab some phone calls right after this.
You know, four years ago, the angriest white man in America was Howard Dean.
Today, the angriest white man in America is Chris Matthews.
And they're both Democrats.
What's the point?
Okay, Dick in Kalamazoo, Michigan.
Great to have you on the program.
Hi.
Thank you, Rush.
I'm sorry.
I was still laughing at it.
Inconvenient.
Oh, that's classic.
You know, Moyers' comments really tell what the intellectual elite in this country think of the masses.
And he used the term public, not just your listeners.
And he sounds as if he resents the fact that somehow you're the only one able to produce that riot in the mind, and he'd like to do it in the other way.
What really bothers me about this is the intellectual elite in this country sits in the White House, never having made a payroll.
He actually thinks he has the ability to rewrite the entire free enterprise system that's involved over 200 years and given us a standard of living that's just raced by every other country on the planet.
Were you talking about Obama there or Moyers?
Moyers first and Obama later.
Okay, Obama second.
Well, first as to Moyers, what Moyers is simply jealous and frustrated that there is no longer a monopoly of media that he is an exclusive member of.
The genie is out of the bottle.
The horse is out of the barn.
The cat's in a litterbug.
Whatever the phrase that you want to use is.
They used to have a monopoly on what you thought and what you knew and what you were told.
And they don't anymore.
And since they're just, they're spoiled little kids, only they're adults.
And since they don't have that monopoly, the people who've taken it away from them are the focus of their envy and anger.
And they are elites.
Who, Moyers?
The program observer is asking me, why does Moyers always bring up how much money I earn when criticized?
Well, it bugs him too.
It bugs them all.
Look at, they're very protective.
You don't, folks, you don't understand the kind of power these people used to have, and they still have quite a bit, by the way.
But it's not a monopoly anymore.
I mean, all these people in the news business still wish they could be Walter Klondike, Cronkite.
They still wish that they could have that much power.
They just severed over the fact that it's not there anymore.
And Moyers goes back to that era, pretty much.
Plus, he's a liberal, and as such, he's uninformed.
He's closed-minded, very narrow-minded guy.
I mean, most liberals are.
They don't let anything outside of the little safety cocoon that they live in penetrate.
As for Obama, he's not, he has no respect for the private sector.
You want to talk about rewriting the rules that have worked here for 200 years.
Exactly right, because he doesn't like it.
He doesn't, this is all about the redistribution of wealth and so many other things.
But it's purposeful, folks.
No one who is even slightly economically literate would be doing this.
And American people are catching on.
This is Doug Bandau.
He's at Cato Institute, but this is from the American Spectator blog.
The president's poll numbers continue to slide.
Remember the stimulus bill?
So do the American people, and not fondly.
Rasmussen, confidence in the $787 billion stimulus plan continues to fall.
A new survey finds only 25% of U.S. voters now say the stimulus plans help the economy.
That's a six-point drop from a month ago.
31% say the stimulus actually hurt the economy.
This is the first poll showing that more voters believe the plan hurt rather than helped.
July has been a disastrous month.
And by the way, here's another poll that shows Obama under 50%.
And if people say, well, yeah, but you're going to do Rasmussen, right?
Well, Rasmussen leans a little right, Rush.
We can't.
Okay, this Zogby.
If Rasmussen leans a little right, and I'm not conceding that, this is what some people say, then you have to admit Zogby leans a little left.
And they came up with the same number.
Survey finds 51% believe U.S. is on the wrong track.
41% say the nation headed in the right direction.
And Obama's job approval has fallen to 48%.
So both Zogby and Rasmussen have the same number.
So there's something ticking out there.
And we've got to make that tick get louder and louder and louder.
Fighting these people is a daily thing.
Bob in Chicago, you're next on the EIB network.
Hello, sir.
Thank you, Rush, very much.
You bet.
For all the wisdom you have shared through the years.
But I've become a good listener of yours, I have to say, honestly, in the last six months.
Well, thank you very much.
And all I can say is I want to apologize to the nation, as funny as it may sound to you, for what representatives we send out of the state of Illinois and to lead the nation the way they're doing.
It's a disgrace.
Yes, it is.
And I see it.
I cannot believe it.
And if anybody owes anybody an apology, the president should apologize to you because you probably have been more help.
He probably listens to you more than a lot of us because you end up being a step ahead of them so many times than you were in this last incident.
And I couldn't believe it.
It only took hours this time for him to turn around and throw him under the bus.
And it's just a shame.
That was funny on Friday when he did throw Gates overboard.
I knew it was going to happen.
We knew that if it did happen, if the focus groups, polling, whatever, if it got really desperate, they'd throw Gates overboard.
And they did.
And now, all kinds of news is coming out about this guy, Gates, and some of his past speeches.
He's got a charitable foundation that gives money to friends and Harvard colleagues, but not very much compared to what it's raised.
He's a racist.
He's an angry racist.
And when he applied for admissions to Yale, he said, yeah, okay, I have to sit and be judged by Whitey again.
He's also, Mark Stein makes a point that he doesn't even know the difference between Robbie Brooks and Shakespeare and who said what.
And he's supposedly this great thinker and professor, so forth.
But Gibbs will not, I mean, the caller said Gibbs should apologize to me for the fanning the flames comment.
Something the last two Democrat administrations have tried to make me out to be racist.
Bill Clinton did it at a White House correspondence dinner early in the 90s, and now Gates on television, I guess, Friday night, when I had nothing to do with it.
All I did was report, and what everybody else did was report what the president said in his press conference.
See, what really bugged them, what really bugged them, when I call him Barack Nyfwong, they always tell you when you score, they'll always tell you when you hit the bullseye.
They were so busy worrying about Barack Nifwong, they didn't hear me call him Barack Fonda.
Wait till they get that.
We'll be back.
Stay with us.
When a Democrat White House gets into a tight spot, Democrat White House gets into a corner, what do they do?
They lash out at Rush Limbaugh.
They lash out at me.
▲
Export Selection