All Episodes
Previous Next
July 21, 2009 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:10
July 21, 2009, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
A thrill, a delight to have you with us, Rush Limboy emitting vocal vibrations.
Coast to coast on the most listened to radio talk show in the country.
Great to have you here.
Always is.
If you want to be on the program, telephone number 800-282-2882, email address, L Rushbo at EIB net.com.
President Obama said this isn't about me.
Talking about health care, all of his legislation, this isn't about me.
This is the man who gave his acceptance speech to Democrat National Convention in front of some foam Greek columns at Invesco Field at Mile High.
This isn't about me, he says.
How is it that Obama can make the short little speech that he just made, and I'm sure that we're working on sound bites even now, although he didn't say anything new, he just told the same lies.
How can he make this speech when he just said he doesn't know what's in the health care bill?
He doesn't know what's in it.
He hasn't read it.
He has denied what the investors business daily people found and Betsy McCoy found about losing your health insurance, that you you won't be able to keep the option that you have now.
He flat out says people will not lose their insurance.
But he doesn't know this.
It's in the bill.
Now, we we are supposed to rely, this is why the White House is getting unhinged.
And this is why I think you're seeing major instability coming out of these people right now, because we, ladies and gentlemen, are supposed to rely on Obama.
Our trust in Obama.
Our love for Obama is supposed to be all that we need.
And let him just rush this bill through.
This is all about trusting him.
It's all about him.
They're using and have used his personality and his supposed magic with the American people to race all of this stuff through, and it worked for Porculus.
And uh it's you know, cap and trade and health care that we're running some roadblocks here.
Because it isn't working when it's all about him.
This is the this is the reason they're getting unhinged in there.
This is all about trusting Obama.
We're supposed to listen to what he says and not hear him.
We're supposed to see him and get the vibe, and then trust him.
It is all about him.
He doesn't want us to read the bill.
He doesn't have to read the bill, he just wants us to trust him.
Now, this little speech today is a joke coming on the heels of him admitting he doesn't know what's in the bill.
He's making promises and guarantees, yet he's taking no questions.
And he's good, press conference tomorrow night.
You know, we it uh I ought to offer, Mr. President.
I'll show up and we'll have a debate on health care, cancel your press conference.
I'll show we'll have a debate on health care tomorrow, because I know he's not gonna get any serious questions, and if he does start to get some serious questions, he'll filibuster an answer for 10 to 12 minutes and limit the number of questions to the press conference, which is a technique.
He's out there reading off notes even today, still I'm sure grieving over the loss of uh teleprompter.
But and he looked like he's getting grayer out there today.
I uh you know, when Clinton played around with the Grecian formula every day, depending on his audience.
We don't know if Obama's doing the uh the same thing or not.
But the bottom line is, I guess, ladies and gentlemen, the uh the value of Obama's plan is not self-evident.
He won't get off the stage.
He's gonna take the baton.
It is all about him.
The plan, the health care plan does not stand on its own.
This is what you have to know.
The plan sucks.
The plan will not stand on its own.
They have to send Obama out to use this magical power of his messianic appeal, his cult-like appeal to people to try to get them over the hump on this.
And how could the plan stand on its own?
They're hiding it.
They don't know what's in it, they're not even reading it themselves.
The people who write it know what's in it, but I mean they're not spreading this around.
It's it's it's uh very obvious here that the bloom is off the rose, and the poll numbers indicate it.
Political today, public losing trust in Obama, just over half the people now trust Obama to identify the right solutions, and forty-four percent, a minority say that we're on the right track.
His poll numbers are lower than Jimmy Carter's at the same stage in their presidencies.
Obama, USA Today Gallup, the tenth most popular president.
He all of that, all that imagery, all that pomp and circumstance is not about me.
It's it's it's it's faded, and it's faded because the things he promised and assured people are not happening, and in fact they're getting worse.
How about health care?
Snerdley told me that a what do you say pack cigarettes is in Florida now?
So a carton is fifty bucks in Florida.
Close to a hundred dollars in New York for a carton of cigarettes, ten packs of those you don't smoke.
10 bucks a pack on the street in New York, and 50 bucks, and that's the that those that that's uh recent tobacco tax, and all of that tax money is going for health care.
S chip program, all that money's going for health care.
Now stick with me on this.
In the House bill, there is a provision that if you make, and this is of course what the bill's all about, regulating our lives, limiting freedom.
There is a provision that if you make a quote-unquote lifestyle choice that puts you at greater risk than the average or the norm, and how they're gonna they get to define that, then your premium is going to be higher even in the public option.
So if you smoke, you're gonna pay a higher premium.
It's in the House bill.
But I looked and I can't find the porker surcharge in the House bill.
What do you mean, Rush?
The porker surgeon.
Well, lifestyle choices, right?
If you make a lifestyle choice that puts you at greater risk than the norm, okay, so let's let the average the porker, the average, the porkers.
You got a 350-pound father, a 400-pound mother, you got five kids, average weight, 250 pounds, the staple of each meal is a twinkie.
I don't see the porker surcharge in this bill.
And there are a lot of other lifestyle choices that people make that place them at greater risk than the norm, but only the smokers.
Now, let's focus on the smokers.
Yeah, I mean, there's no there's no uh there's no surcharge for promiscuity.
There's no slut surcharge.
I mean, I would there's no satyr surcharge, you know, giggle surcharge.
I mean, all these lifestyle, there are no alcohol surcharge.
That'll be in there, though, at some point, but I want to focus on smoking.
I made this point on previous occasions, and I'd like to make it again.
There was a time in this country where almost, in fact, it was slightly over 50% of adults smoked cigarettes.
Over 50% lit up.
They puffed, they inhaled, they exhaled, smoked cigarettes.
It's not even count the cigar and pipe smokers.
Today, less than 25% of adults, well, 25% of the population because of kids smoke, less than 25% of the population are smoking cigarettes.
We've gone from 50% to 25% smoking has been cut in half.
And obviously, secondhand smoking has been cut even more.
There's less secondhand smoke out there because there's less firsthand smoke.
Right?
Now, what were we promised?
We were promised better health, and what else were we promised?
If we could cut smoking and get people to stop smoking and get it banned in public, what would we?
Right.
We were promised lower health care costs.
What do we have?
After half the people who smoked have quit.
We've Gone from 50% to 25%, promised better health and lower health care costs.
What do we have?
We have higher health care costs.
In fact, we have much higher health care costs.
I'm not I'm not talking about the health benefits of not smoking.
I'm talking about the claim that it would sharply reduce health care costs.
It would put less strain financially on the health care system, the more people quit, and the less secondhand smoke.
And it was a lie.
Like every practically every other claim that liberals make, that Democrats make in their programs like this, it was a lie.
The very claim that we are dealing with today that we've got to do Obamacare to reduce health care costs.
And you know how that does.
You know how it happens?
In Obama in in in Obama land, you reduce health care costs by denying coverage to more people.
You think 47 million uninsured means 47 million don't get coverage.
That's not true.
But it's going to come close to true with Obamacare.
That's the only way that they can cut costs.
Less smoking didn't reduce health care costs.
The subprime mortgage didn't guarantee affordable housing for people.
It wrecked in part the financial system.
Subprime health care will not reduce health care costs.
First, smoking increased taxes.
Look at this.
As the number of people quit smoking, they told us to quit smoking, everybody quit smoking, 50% did.
What happened?
They paid a penalty for it.
Taxes went up.
Because tax revenue went down.
Today, smokers should be given the Congressional Medal of Honor.
They are the single largest tax contributors to health care programs for kids in the cities and states of this country.
So what happened?
Smoking increased taxes.
Subprime health care will increase taxes even more, first a little, then a little more, and then a lot more.
So what's the lesson?
The lesson is that believing liberal claims on health care savings can be more dangerous to your health than smoking.
Quick timeout, we'll be back.
Your phone calls next, I promise.
Talent on loan from God.
And now to the phones, people have been patiently waiting.
We have a doctor from Jacksonville, Florida.
Eric, thank you for holding on.
You're up first.
Hello.
Hey, Rush, thank you for having me, and definitely thank you for speaking for all the doctors out there.
I think there's a lot of interest in what's been going on in Washington lately.
Thank you, sir.
Um, wanted to bring up a point.
In order for a bill to be taken seriously by the American people, it has to contain some aspect of tort reform in it.
I think the astronomical increase in malpractice uh cost for physicians is well known, but I do have a concept of defensive medicine practices, which these are tests or order or studies that are that are taken not to improve diagnostic accuracy, but uh essentially to practice CYA medicine for liability from lawsuits.
And this cost about 15% of all medicine costs are $360 billion a year.
Um wait, I lost track here of what you said.
Your concept would cost or tort reform costs 360.
So I think tort reform would limit this.
Um the practice of defensive medicine.
Oh, okay, okay.
Oh, defensive, okay.
So without tort reform with tort reform or without the threat of being sued every time you see a patient, uh you can eliminate a bunch of unnecessary tests that you know you don't really need, but you take them anyway in order to cover yourself, right?
Absolutely against the trial lawyer.
There's a tremendous amount of data on how prevalent this is, and our hands are really tied without some sort of cap on lawsuits.
And I think I think that's an important concept that goes beyond uh just the the dollars and cents value of the practice.
You are, there's no question you're right, but I'm gonna give you the hard cold truth.
With Democrats in charge of right and let us legislation, there will never Be anything approaching tort reform.
The trial lawyers are among their biggest donors, contributors, supporters, their trial lawyers end up being judges that advance liberal agenda with without any accountability and no uh no need to be elected.
Um any of the Democrats are tort lawyers themselves, members of Congress, and in fact, so as long as you have uh Democrats, liberals in charge, there isn't going to be but tort reform, but it would dramatically reduce health care costs.
Absolutely.
I I agree with you, and I think the the American people need to stand up for the physicians now.
And uh you know, we need to take a stance and say that we want our physicians, we want our access, and uh we want our freedom to choose.
Look at I agree with you 100%.
You guys are being demonized right along.
And Obama did it again today's speech.
Demonize the drug companies, demonize the insurance companies.
They're playing class in.
But you know, here's here's something about Obama.
You know how he could have gotten this?
He could have had his health care reform bill in March.
If he were the guy everybody thought he was.
Remember now, everybody thought Barack Obama was above politics.
It was time to get rid of the old Washington.
Every candidate says it, but they believed he meant it.
They believed he was something new, that's the cult.
They believed he was something heretofore unseen.
And if he would have come in there and put through things in there like tort reform, and he could have gotten what he wants.
But you know what got in the way?
He's nothing but a twisted liberal, radical ideologue.
He is no different than any other elected Democrat, except he's more radical.
The stimulus bill, every he is more radical, he is more liberal, he is not at he is just like every damned other one of them.
There is nothing new about Barack Obama.
There's nothing we haven't seen before.
There's nothing special.
In fact, he's less qualified than most who run for the office.
Much less qualified than those who get elected.
He is a fraud.
He is nothing.
Like he said he was.
And we're probably pretty lucky, because if he were what he said he was, we would have all this stuff by now.
There'd be no stopping him.
But he can't, he's a petty, angry partisan politician.
Liberal radical politician.
The communist Randall Hovind, it's American thinker.
I've got it in the stack.
This was published last week, and I wasn't here.
Well, it was Friday, I think it was.
I whenever it was, uh there are other more pressing items, but they've got excerpts from Mr. Hovind has assembled excerpts from the leader of the Communist Party USA.
When this guy analyzes what's happened the first six months of the Obama administration, it's gold star, gold star, gold star, gold star.
We're in great shape.
Obama's doing what in fact you can't really tell the difference in this guy.
And Obama.
Striking.
He's not special.
He's not something we haven't seen.
In fact, ladies and gentlemen, I'd like to share with you a few excerpts from his acceptance speech in Denver.
He never ran anything in his life.
He worked in the Senate not much more than 150 days.
We have no track.
We only have his associations, his background, his childhood, the people who mentored him, and his campaign promises.
He has no resume.
There aren't any records from Harvard from Columbia, where we went to school.
There are no medical work.
We don't know who he is.
So we have to go on his campaign promises.
He said we measure progress by how many people can find a job that can't pay the mortgage that pays the mortgage.
Whether you can put a little extra money away at the end of each month, so you can someday watch your child receiver college diploma.
Well, if he's measuring progress by how many people find a job, he's got to be assessing himself as a failure.
We measure progress in the 23 million new jobs created when Bill Clinton was president.
We've lost over two million jobs just since he was inaugurated.
Our government should work for us, not against us.
It should help us not hurt us.
It should ensure opportunity, not just for those with the most money and influence.
He's wiping out opportunity for everybody.
As president, I will tap our natural gas reserves, invest in clean coal, and find ways to safely harness nuclear power.
He's doing none of that.
Solar and wind.
And big gambles on green technology that doesn't.
I can go on.
I can read excerpts.
We're lucky he's not who he said he was.
We'll be back.
Well, I just checked the email during the break, and um.
It's amazing.
The seminar emailers are out in droves.
Rush, please stop speeding up Obama.
I don't, I have I have a hearing problem.
I can't understand what he said.
Look, I'm deaf and I can understand what he's saying.
You haven't speeded up to chipmunk.
Don't try that on me.
Don't tell me you got a hearing problem.
I am deaf and I can hear it.
Right?
Why are you doing this?
It's just very distracting.
It's very all the libs, they're just there.
They know how effective this is.
And then I'm getting people saying, you are really blowing it today.
You're lying.
When you say that Obama's lying that you're gonna keep your health insurance.
Have you read all 1018, but he hasn't read it, you haven't read it.
Man, I'll tell you, folks, the libs and and even, you know, there's some libs out there that are starting to figure out they are gonna lose their health coverage that they like.
I mean, they're in there they're they are in a situation they didn't anticipate.
They were relying on Obama.
This is all about him.
They're relying on the power of his cult like appeal to get everybody over the hump of the details.
And it isn't working.
There's another great article breaking down Obama's lies about this.
He says it isn't about him.
Everything is about him.
When you lie to the American people about what legislation is and isn't, you're putting your personal credibility on the line.
Obama owns this legislation that he admits he hasn't read.
Bernie Madoff owned the fraudulent investment schemes he was peddling, and he was promising people all this great stuff, and look what happened to him and the people who believed him.
Obama is making personal promises.
He is personally guaranteeing results just like he did with the stimulus package and his failed mortgage uh uh foreclosure legislation.
I'll tell you another reason why this is about Obama, it's because he's the one remaking America.
Wall Street Journal.
So when Mr. Obama says that if you like your health care plan, you'll be able to keep your health care plan, period.
No one will take it away no matter what, he's wrong, period.
What he's not telling the American people is the government will so dramatically change the rules of the insurance market that employers will find it impossible to maintain their current coverage, and many will drop it altogether because they want to offload it to the government.
So as the journal writes, the more we inspect the House bill, the more it looks to be one of the worst pieces of legislation legislation ever introduced in Congress.
By the way, you know, one of Obama's favorite tactics is to take major, respectable, credible private sector institutions or companies and say they support him.
He did it with caterpillar.
He's out there saying the hospital's a male clinic.
They support my plan, a world-renowned clinic that Obama held up as an example of good medicine.
Said yesterday the American people would be losers under the House's health care proposal, joining a growing chorus of critics.
The administration is trying to fend off as the debate intensifies.
Minnesota's not-for-profit mail clinic, which Obama has repeatedly hailed as offering top quality health care at affordable costs, blasted the House Democrats' version of the health care plan.
Uh said there's some positive elements in there, but overall the proposed legislation misses the opportunity to help create higher quality, more affordable health care for patients, because that's not what it is about, folks.
It's not about health care.
Don't doubt me.
Monica in Midland, Michigan.
Hi, welcome to the EIB network.
Hi, Russ.
Thank you for taking my call.
Yes, ma'am.
Are you are you employed?
Yes, I am.
Well, we ask everybody from Michigan because it's rare.
Well, it works for the government.
Well, you know, the government and health care, by the way, are the only sectors where jobs are increasing.
And health care is supposedly in trouble.
Anyway, what you have?
I had a question that I haven't heard anybody talk about, and I wanted your take on it.
Um Obama's saying that if you're happy with your health care, you're not going to lose it.
The bill is saying that you need to be in a qualified health care within five years.
There are millions of children under the age of twelve.
There are millions of children yet to be born.
What's going to happen when they enter the workforce?
Are they going to be allowed to keep their parents' insurance that they're on currently?
I I would think that they're going to have to be funneled into the government health care plan.
Not you are absolutely right.
The whole point of this, the whole point of this is to get everybody enrolled in the government health care plan.
The whole point of this is to eliminate private insurance.
Qualified or unqualified.
It's it's so easy, by the way, Monica, for you to start out in this system with a qualified plan and then to have it be disqualified.
For example, you are this is in the bill.
You have a qualified plan.
You have your own private insurance qualified plan from your employer, or you buy it yourself.
But then, within a year after this bill is signed into law, if any aspect of that plan changes, like they change the premium or they make some adjustment in coverage, your plan's no longer qualified.
Right.
And I was concerned about it anyway because I work for a city government, and we just had a bunch of cuts and they're trying to balance the budget.
And health care is a huge cost for them.
And I can see easily that in five or six years when they're trying to look at costs, they can say, Well, you can go get the government health care.
We can't supply that with for you anymore.
Yeah, well, it's it's even more drastic than that because uh if your city is having trouble with costs, the states are having look, Medicare and Medicaid are Medicaid's bankrupting the states, Medicare is bankrupting the federal government.
We're going to build on top of those two failures with a system that's based on both of them.
Uh and the and the and the only way uh you know the you you know who the people in this country are most concerned about health care, the elderly, by definition.
They're the ones that spend most of the time in the doctor's office talking to their doctors and so forth, by definition.
They're the ones that are going to get shaft.
They're the ones upon whom judgment will descend as to whether or not the investment in whatever medical procedure is needed to keep them alive is worth it.
And it'll be based on actuarial tables such as life expectancy, uh, any precondition uh pre existing conditions.
If you're a hundred years old and in perfect health, but you need a pacemaker.
The odds are you're not gonna get it.
Obama even used that as an example.
Some people, you know, give him a pain pill.
Save money.
In the New York Times.
An Obama administration official refused to rule out the possibility that federal tax money will be used, might be used to pay for abortions under proposed health care legislation.
Peter Orsag, or Orzog, I think he pronounces it, the White House budget director, was asked whether he was prepared to say that no taxpayer money will go to pay for abortions.
He said, I'm not prepared to say that right now.
Of course it's an it's it's constitutional.
It's a legally approved medical procedure.
And with liberals running this show, they count.
You know, every abortion is a political uh victory for them.
You remember what Root Buzzy Ginsburg said?
She let the cat out of the bag.
Abortion is about kind of limiting uh people in population that you don't really want more of.
And we know who she was talking about.
This is a dastardly plan.
Uh, let's go.
We got three sound bites here from President Obama.
Thanks for the call, Monica.
Appreciate it.
Here's Obama returning.
This is my point.
The old Democrat playbook, demonized drug insurance companies and all that, Dreamonize doctors.
Uh just it's it's it's it's your average run of the mill Democrat taxes spending in, except this guy's more radical than any of them that have come before him.
I know that there are those in this town who openly declare their intention to block reform.
It's a familiar Washington script that we've seen many times before.
These opponents of reform would rather score political points than offer a relief to Americans who've seen premiums double and costs grow three times faster than wages.
They would maintain a system that works for the insurance and the drug companies while becoming increasingly unaffordable for families and for businesses.
All right.
The TAC opponents are stooges of the drug and insurance companies right out of Democrat Party playbook.
Here's the next bite.
Under each of these bills, you won't be denied coverage if you've got a pre-existing medical condition.
You won't lose your health care if you change jobs, if you lose your job, or if you start a business.
You won't lose your insurance if you get sick.
We've agreed that our health reform bill will promote choice.
Americans will be able to compare the price and quality of different plans and pick the plan that they want.
Your current plan, you will be able to keep it.
That is not true.
He he just admitted to liberal bloggers last night he is not aware of the provision that makes that not possible.
He didn't know it was in the bill.
Under each of the bills, House and Senate, you won't be denied coverage if you've got a pre-existing.
You will forget.
He doesn't he also said you won't lose your health care if you change jobs.
There's no portability in his plan.
You won't lose your insurance if you get sick.
He he himself uses the example of a hundred-year-old woman who needs a pacemaker.
And here's the lecture.
We need hope and change.
The American people understand that the status quo is unacceptable.
They don't care who's up or who's down politically in Washington.
They care about what's going on in their own lives.
They don't care about the latest line of political attack.
They care about whether their families will be crushed by rising premiums, whether the businesses they work for will have to cut jobs, or whether their children are going to be saddled with debt.
I can guarantee you that when we do pass this bill, history won't record the demands for endless delay or endless debates in the news cycle.
It will record the hard work done by the members of Congress to pass the bill and the fact that the people who sent us here to Washington insisted upon change.
They don't want this, Mr. President.
Bye.
Thank you.
This is this is but that's that's that's that's what's so bold about this.
They care about what's going on in their own lives.
They don't care about the latest line of attack.
They care about whether their families are crushed by rising premiums, whether the business they work for will have to cut job will have to cut j.
They have cut jobs over two million since you took office.
Whether their children are going to be saddled with debt, they already are.
These people think we're stupid.
They think it's...
It's about him using his personality, his cult-like appeal.
where details don't matter.
Oh.
Gotta take a break.
Back after this.
Stay with us.
Rushlin bought a Woodstock, California.
Is that Georgia?
Georgia, Woodstock, Georgia, and Cynthia.
Hi, Cynthia.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Hello.
It is such an honor to talk to you today.
I am a huge fan, and I thank you for taking my call.
You bet.
I um we found out this morning that my husband became a statistic of Obama.
He uh got laid off from his job.
And uh we're devastated.
You know, it's um uh we didn't vote for Obama.
We don't like Obama.
And here this is the change we're getting.
And when's it gonna change?
When are things gonna turn around?
When are these jobs that he promised?
When are they coming about?
It's it's terrible.
I mean, what has this man done for our country in the past five, six months?
Nothing.
Wreck it.
Yeah.
And we're just I I'm tired of him.
Didn't like him before, don't like him now.
Yeah, I uh I hear you.
I'm as frustrated, if not more so than you are, and I have not been laid off.
Yeah.
Although they are gunning for me.
Oh, aren't they, though?
But let me ask let me I look at you you ask me a question, and I am an honest host.
Mm-hmm.
And I can only tell you what the Obama administration said in answer to a question similar to yours.
Uh-huh.
And Larry Summers went out, you know, uh he's one of the economic uh advisors to Obama.
Hey, stimulus work, you know, it's it's working just like we thought.
But this is going to be a jobless recovery.
So things aren't going to change job wise.
They're gonna get worse.
Uh Obama himself admits that unemployment will exceed 10%.
Uh-huh.
Your husband is part of the statistic that will lead it higher than nine and a half, which it was at the last reporting period.
Right.
Uh however, having said that, what I I don't know what your husband does for a living.
He does uh computer forensics.
Computer forensics.
All right.
There is still time.
Obama has not destroyed the private sector.
He's in route.
Uh-huh.
He's on the way.
But he hasn't eliminated opportunity yet.
Um there are any number of things that people still need service-wise in this economy.
Point is your husband may there are plenty of great jobs in computer business in India.
Uh especially for computer forensic.
And they're just they're just getting up to speed.
Your husband could own a job in in India, but I doubt that you want to move there.
Exactly.
Right.
Um, so you you're left here with facing do you work?
I work part-time because we have a child with special needs, and so I have to do work part-time so I can take him to his therapies and and be there for him.
So it's it's put us in a bind.
I mean, my husband is the the breadwinner.
And um, you know, we're we're concerned.
Well, you'll be you'll be comforted to know that there are unemployment compensation benefits.
Oh, yes.
Um, that will be extended to you.
Uh-huh.
Uh that'll, you know, cover about 25%.
Yeah.
But look at uh uh.
You know, I say this to people throughout the twenty plus years I've been hosting this program because people have lost their jobs every year, and it happens.
People lose jobs, lose careers, change jobs, change careers and so forth.
There's still um I don't know how big a place Woodstock, Georgia is.
We're we're right outside of Atlanta.
All right.
That's there.
You still live in the United States of America, and there are still jobs out there to be had.
There are people getting jobs.
It's just the fact that more people are losing them than are getting them.
Right.
This is still a country where you can create your own job.
Uh-huh.
Now he was doing computer forensics for a company, right?
Right.
Nothing stopping him from hanging his own shingle.
Right.
He can do this.
This is the United States of America.
I I'm not trying to be falsely optimistic here or or hopeful, but this guy hasn't succeeded in beating everybody down yet.
Yet.
Mm-hmm.
And so I understand your frustration.
Uh I relate to it, and I I'm as angry as you are.
I'm an American.
I I detest what I see this these administration doing.
I detest it.
There is no need for this.
We can't believe this is America.
It blows our minds when we wake up every morning, we watch the news, we're like, this is America.
This isn't the America that we grew up with in.
I mean, it just blows our mind.
Well, it certainly won't be if this guy succeeds.
That's right.
And we're behind you where we don't want him to succeed.
Well, we want him to fail.
Yeah.
And the problem is he is failing.
Yes.
With his own plan, which we knew would fail.
I wanted him to fail implementing the plan, but regardless.
Well, good luck.
Thank you.
Chin up.
We will.
There is opportunity out there.
Your husband, the computer forensics is a bright guy.
He'll find something.
I'm confident.
Thank you.
You bet.
All right.
You too, Cynthia, be back after this, folks.
Stay with us.
Our last caller asked what Obama's done for the country, and I I neglected to answer that.
He closed Gitmo, except now he can't.
He got us out of Iraq, except we're still there.
He ended, he ended partisanship, except he didn't.
He ended racial politics, except he's promoting it.
And he saved millions of jobs.
But he has not yet stopped the seas from rising.
As he promised, that that's still a work in progress.
That's about it.
That's um that's what he's done.
▲
Export Selection