All Episodes
Previous Next
July 16, 2009 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:45
July 16, 2009, Thursday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Hiya, folks, how are you?
Great to be with you.
It's always great to be with you.
It's a thrill and a delight to be with you.
And I know it's the same for you.
It's a thrill and delight to be here.
The views expressed by the host of this program, as you know, make more sense than anything anybody else out there happens to be saying.
And the view is expressed by the host on this program now documented to be almost always right.
99.
What was the last one?
What was the last one?
No, no, no, no.
It was 99.1.
I don't think we've been at 99.7.
99.1, which still is the same, whatever it was.
I haven't received an opinion on an update, so it's from the Sullivan group.
99.1% of the time documented to be almost always right.
Great to have you here, folks.
I unfortunately, and I know to your great sadness, will be out tomorrow, but just tomorrow.
And as such, we're going to do Open Line Friday on Thursday today, meaning whenever we go to the phones, the program is all yours.
Normally, Monday through Thursday, we only talk about things I care about.
And on Friday, I throw that out and allow people to talk about things I may not care about and then fake it, act like I do care.
We'll do that today.
So when we go to the phones, whatever you want to talk about, for the most part, it's fair game, and it's your show, 800-282-2882, email address, lrushbo at eibnet.com.
And I've been watching these Sonia Sotomayor hearings.
And the Republicans, you know, they've blown a couple things, but it's been pretty good.
She's been exposed for what she is.
And we've got soundbites here proving something that I made mention of yesterday that the far-left legal community is very upset that she's lying about who she is, that she doesn't have the guts to be a wise Latina in public.
That she doesn't have the guts to be smarter than everybody else.
That she doesn't have the guts to show that she's a full-fledged liberal radical.
They're upset about this.
We have two soundbites coming up.
We also have some soundbites.
This woman butchers the English language more than George Bush could ever try to if he ever got drunk again.
We have samples, examples coming up.
But I've been watching these hearings, ladies and gentlemen, and these hearings have given everybody a chance to reveal themselves.
Transparency has not helped Soto Mayor.
It hadn't helped Obama.
It hadn't helped the Democrats.
And as the hearings have progressed, as I mentioned, a lot of liberals have turned on her.
And I got to thinking in the old days when C-SPAN televised what went on in the House, we actually saw, for the most part, legislation being crafted.
We don't anymore.
It all takes place behind closed doors.
Then they come out in the House floor and they debate things they've already decided.
Major legislation no longer allowed extensive hearings and debate.
There was no hearing or debate that anybody saw on the amnesty bill.
They're not going to be hearing or debate on the tax and cap bill or on the health care bill.
And as such, people will not know what this is really all about unless they are familiar with certain media sources.
It's all taking place behind closed doors because it is so ugly.
The New York Post has a chart today, a graphic, explaining how the health care bill of Obama will affect New Yorkers, single and married, in various income groups, various income levels.
And it's going to kill the city.
57% Top rate for the highest earners when they add up federal, state, city, Medicare, Social Security.
In fact, let me find that chart even now.
I put it down.
Here it is.
If every newspaper.
Let me zoom in on this.
You're not going to be able to read the chart, but I just want to show you on the Ditto Cam what I'm reading from there.
Sorry, it won't focus any better than that, but that's what I'm going to be reading from in mere moments.
If every newspaper around the country would publish a chart like this, ladies and gentlemen, it would go a long way toward helping stop this thing.
Here, what Obama's health care plan means to New Yorkers, four examples of the big new tax burden New Yorkers would face under the bill that passed the House.
Single Wall Street worker earning $285,000 a year.
His federal income tax will be $79,000.
The New York State tax will be close to $20,000.
His New York City tax will be just over $10,000.
The new health care tax, $2,850.
Medicare, almost $3,000.
His total tax bill on a gross of $285,000 will be $115,254.
The percentage of his income going to taxes will be $40.44%.
A small business owner, $500,000 payroll, 10 employees and no health care plan.
A new 8% no health care tax penalty will be assessed on this guy at $40,000.
If you do not provide health insurance, you get penalized $40,000, which means this guy would have to lay off one employee making $50,000 to make up for the new tax.
$80,000 a year worker with no health insurance.
$80,000 a year.
Remember now, this is a group Obama has said will pay no increase in taxes.
Federal income tax, $16,000.
New York state tax, $5,000.
New York City tax, $7, or $2,000, almost $3.
So you're looking at $16,000 federal, $8,000 New York state and city, Medicare, $2,300, and the new 2.5% no health care tax penalty on individuals if you don't have health care, $2,000 for a woman making $80,000.
A person making $80,000.
It was a woman in this case in the graphic.
Her total tax bill on an income of $80,000 a year in New York City, $28,391.
Her income going to taxes, 35.48%.
I guarantee you that's a huge tax increase for this person.
Married couple, combined income, $1.5 million.
Federal income tax, $455,000.
New York State tax, $125,000.
New York City tax, $55,000.
So $125, $155, you're looking at $180,000 taxes in New York State and the city, $455,000.
Federal.
The new health care tax on them of 5.4%, $81,000.
That's a tax they're not now paying.
These taxes do not include the cap and trade taxes.
These taxes do not include the tax increases that are going to happen when Bush's tax cuts expire.
The Medicare tax on these people, $2,958.
Their total tax bill on an income of $1.5 million will be $718,775.
$718,000.
So If they're a New York City resident, their rate will be 58.68%.
If they're New York state residents, the rate will be 56.92.
If they don't work in the city, and I'm talking about the group now, the couple with $1.5 million, 56.9% in the state, 58% total rate if you live in the city.
So you're getting up anything over a million dollars.
You're getting close to a 60% tax rate in New York City.
Well, that's what we were talking yesterday.
There reaches a tipping point where people say, what's the point of working?
I keep 40% of what I earn.
How do I live in this city on 40% of what I earn?
And this, so you're paying for other people who won't work.
I'm telling, folks, if you have never believed me, believe me now, this is the greatest illustration of the whole purpose of the Obama administration.
Return the nation's wealth to its so-called rightful owners, the people that haven't earned it, the people who haven't tried to earn it.
They are the minorities, the victims, the poor.
And this is to chop the head off of the people who make this country work.
That's the purpose of this.
Nobody with a brain, nobody with a sane moment in their lives would propose something like this thinking it is going to help anybody.
It's not going to help everybody get health care.
It's not going to improve anybody's health care.
It's not going to improve anybody's insurance situation.
It's just going to destroy their prosperity, which is the objective.
And if Congress, if we were allowed, if they were doing hearings and if we had people and experts testifying to this stuff in open committee hearings rather than behind closed doors, where people would be able to hear it and see it if it were broadcast on certain news networks, that would go a long way to being able to stop this kind of stuff.
Or if every newspaper in America would simply run the numbers like the New York Post did, or how it's going to affect residents in their city and state, if they did this in L.A., if they did it in San Francisco, it wouldn't matter there.
If they did it in Detroit, it wouldn't matter there.
If they did it in New Orleans, might matter there.
But they do it all of the, all of the large and small.
It would go a long way to putting the brakes on some of the.
And this is why Obama's doing his best to hurry this along before people en masse discover that this is what's happening.
Quick timeout.
We'll be back.
We'll continue.
What?
What?
Now, we're going to get into this, Snerdley.
I can't do everything in the opening monologue.
Yes, I realize that an ex-wife can only get half of what you have.
Obama and the states are now going to come in and take over half of what you have after you pay the ex-wife.
I mean, if that's what your concern is.
But I mean, there's a tipping point at which people say, what's the point?
And they're doing this by design.
They know what these numbers are.
They're doing this by design.
And this is not, this is just a health care tax increase.
This is why I said yesterday that you cannot, you can't, any, any economic forecast, gross domestic product, unemployment, whatever, you're going to forecast the future of the country.
You can't possibly predict it with any certainty at all unless you know what this kind of stuff, how much of this kind of stuff is going to be enacted.
And I can tell you, if this gets enacted, there's no growth.
There will not be any economic growth.
And I'm telling you, that's the design.
Back in just a second.
Meeting and surpassing all audience expectations every busy broadcast day.
I am your highly trained broadcast specialist, Rush Limbaugh, behind the golden EIB microphone.
Fascinating data here, folks, in the latest Gallup poll that's out today.
The headline of the Gallup poll, somewhat misleading, Romney Edges Palin and Huckabee in early 2012 GOP test.
The subhead is the real story.
Palin's favorable rating, stable after announcing her resignation.
So the numbers of this candidate most likely to support for the 2012 Republican nomination of president today based on Republicans and Republican-leaning independents.
Romney 26.
Sarah Palin 21.
Huckabee 19.
Newt 14.
Tim Polenti 3%.
Haley Barber 2%.
However, when you get to the favorable ratings of current leading contenders, you have Sarah Palin at 72% approval among Republicans and Republican-leaning independents.
56% approve of Romney.
59% approve of Huckabee.
Let me give you the unfavorables too.
72 to 21, unfavorable Palin.
56-17, favorable, unfavorable Romney.
59-16, favorable, unfavorable Huckabee.
Now, Sarah Palin's favorable rating among Republicans is the top.
72%.
Do you know what this means?
I went to dinner the other day.
I got to tell you this.
Everywhere I go, I run into these Republicans who just spout the Katie Couric version of Palin.
Hell, it's a bone up on foreign policy.
Not very deep, Rush.
I think it's embarrassing.
Hey, I don't know, Rush.
I think it's a horrible.
We don't want to.
I just, I just, you know, at the dinner table the other night, somebody said something similar to that, and I said, no, no, no, I think she's wonderful.
What do you mean?
What do you mean?
I said, you know what?
I said, we have too many people in our party who allow the media to influence what they think of our own candidates.
And they're looking at it the wrong way.
I said this to the table.
If any of you here are waiting for a candidate to come along that gains the favor and the approval of the mainstream media, then I guarantee you that candidate is a guaranteed loser.
I said, all you have to do, all you have to do is listen to the media.
They will tell you, listen to the Democrats.
Sarah Palin, they are trying to destroy.
They've been trying to, they filed another ethics investigation into her in Alaska after she announced her resignation.
They're trying to destroy her.
The liberals, the left, the drive-by media, they are telling us who our nominee should be.
They're telling us who they are most afraid of.
But we got people who listen to this and look at this.
Oh, they don't like Palin.
Well, I don't like her either.
You know, if the media doesn't like her, if she's this dirty little secret, flying back on the golf trip, flying back cross-country.
Had a conversation, the exact conversation, and I got a little mad and I threw my eyeglasses off on a seat in front of me.
Excused myself and went back to the bathroom and he ended up playing to cool off because I was hearing the same stuff.
Now let me put this 72% in perspective.
Name for me any Republican or conservative who has had a 72% approval rating in the party after a year of trashing by the state-run media and the Democrat Party.
Name for me one Republican candidate who has maintained a 72% approval rating while their life and their career has been under assault for the purpose of destruction, which is the case with Sarah Palin.
72% approval in the Gallup poll.
Political gurus, pundits, these yapping yammerers all over TV, palin trashers in the Republican Party, assorted looking down-the-nose low-wattage elitists.
You might call the office here to figure out what's going on.
Now, this is not going to sit well with the elites in the Republican Party, the country club blue-blood Rockefeller Republicans.
They don't like her nearly as much as the Democrats don't like her.
But I mean, I think this is 72% after a year in which she has been the target of literal political destruction.
Folks, I'm just telling you, for any of you wimpy, wishy-washy Republicans out there who so desperately want to have a candidate that the sophisticates in the media in Washington and New York approve of, you are guaranteed to secure the Republican Party defeat after defeat after defeat.
If you're going to let them pick our nominee, which happened last time, by the way, they picked our nominee.
That would be John Sidney McCain.
They picked him.
And then after they picked him, of course they abandoned him.
They move over for Obama.
Even Colin Powell did the same thing, even though McCain's Powell's ideal Republican.
And then you couple this news with what we mentioned yesterday.
40% of the American people identify themselves as conservative.
21% identify themselves as liberal.
Liberals don't have the guts to tell anybody who they are.
Sultomayora is the latest glittering example of that.
I think 35% call themselves independents.
Now, you might say, well, Rush, those people are liberals, too.
I don't know.
In this context, I'm not actually certain.
But regardless, this cannot be said enough.
See, the Gallup poll leads with Romney Edges Palin 26 to 21 in who are you going to vote for right now, which is three and a half years away.
It's irrelevant.
But approval number, 72% Palin after this year she's had 56% for Romney.
A brief timeout, ladies and gentlemen.
Much more broadcast excellence straight ahead after this.
All right.
Now we know the tax rates.
We know the utter destruction of the United States private sector as a result of President Obama's health care plan.
We now know the numbers.
New York Post has added numbers to the tax increases that are going to take place.
We can extrapolate this all over the country.
This is it for the Republican Party.
This is it.
And this, you know, if the Republican Party cannot stand up, unified, and oppose this on the simple basis of the economic killing aspects of these high taxes, then they may as well find another reason to exist.
This is it.
This should not be a brainer.
Sadly, ladies and gentlemen, there are some in the Republican Party who think that we should, like Colin Powell, who think we should be paying higher taxes.
And people want calling for it and want bigger government and so forth.
But this is a golden opportunity here.
Golden, golden, golden opportunity.
It's just been handed to them on a silver platter.
John Kyle, I'm given to understand here from my buddy Andy McCarthy at National Review.
It's via Jennifer Rubin, who's writing about this on commentary at their contentions blog.
John Kyle is just tying Sotomayor up in knots this morning.
Did you watch a little bit of it, Snurdy?
I didn't.
As I said yesterday, the voice, the whole thing, I did.
So I'm relying on others to tell me what happened.
And this is apparently pretty good.
He was really zeroing in on Ricci.
You know, she said that she was relying on precedent.
And Kyle said, what precedent?
What's the precedent?
Why not vote for an N Bank review?
Meaning, all judges on the Second Circuit.
And she supposedly muddled that answer as well as she muddled the answer about president.
So Kyle apparently scored some pretty big points.
I want to play four sound bites for you here of Sonia Sotomayor from various times in her career and show how she butchers the English language.
That's fine and dandy.
We all butcher the English language.
But were it not for I, were it not for me pointing it out, you wouldn't know about it.
A Republican nominee doing this kind of thing, it'd be laughed about all over the media.
They'd be talking about how this guy's not smart enough.
They've got to go.
If it were George W. Bush.
Here is the first example.
This is from Oral Arguments December 10, 2007 in the Ricci v. D'Estefano.
That's the firefighter case.
This first seven who are going to be hired only because of the vagrancies of the vacancies at that moment.
She meant to say vagaries, but she said vagrancies.
The first seven who are, in fact, that whole clip, what we have here, we don't, well, I don't have it, but there's a clip.
This audio from which we culled this is Sotomayor interrupting the lawyers for the firefighters.
The lawyers for the firefighters are making a brilliant case as to why only qualified people should be hired.
And she makes it very clear that she's not concerned about any of that.
She's only concerned about race being accounted for by coming up with a test where minorities have a better chance to pass it.
So the first seven who are going to be hired only because of the vagrancies of the vacancies.
She meant vagaries.
Here's the next example.
Under New York law, if you're being threatened with imminent death or very serious injury.
It is not eminent.
It is imminent with an I in front of it.
Here's the next one.
Educate themselves.
They build up a story of knowledge about legal thinking.
It's a store of knowledge.
You build up.
Now, remember, I mean, we're tall, this woman, she worked hard.
This woman is brilliant.
This woman is just fabulous.
These are you don't find too many learned people making these kinds of vocabulary mistakes.
Vagrancies for vagaries, eminent for imminent, a story of knowledge for store of knowledge.
And here's the last one.
All questions of policy are within the providence of Congress first.
Providence, it is province of Congress, not providence.
Providence is a city in Rhode Island.
It's also, Providence is also a record of, say you're a wine collector and you have some old classics and you want to sell them.
You've got to be able to prove the Providence.
You have to be able to prove that they're real.
How you got them, where they've been, how they've been stored.
That's the providence of something.
The Providence, the questions of policy are the province, the right of Congress.
So there she is, Judge Sonia Sotomayor.
Oh, and you've got to hear this too.
Yesterday, skip number five, I made the point that it sure seems to me like she knows the answers to the Democrat questions in the committee.
Because when the Democrats start asking a question, I mean, she right in there with the great onomatopoeia, she just doesn't, there's no hesitation whatsoever.
She's just in there.
When the Republicans ask her questions, a bunch of him-hawing around, like Kyle this morning, a bunch of him-hawing around and writing on her notepad and trying to figure out what to do.
Yesterday, she got a question from Senator Al Franken on Perry Mason.
Al Franken asked a judicial Supreme Court nominee about Perry Mason.
Here was the exchange.
We're going to have round two, so I'll ask you some more questions there.
What was the one case in Perry Mason that I wish I remembered the name of the episode, but I don't.
Stop the tape.
She knew that was coming.
Recue that.
She knew this was coming.
How in the world, if I'm a Supreme Court nominee and some clown senator asks me about the last thing I'm going to do to prep for my hearing in confirmation, the U.S. Supreme Court is being prepared to answer a question about Perry Mason, a TV series back in the 50s.
Now, don't get me wrong.
I love the show.
Every Saturday night, my mom and dad would cook steaks, baked potatoes out there, and we'd watch it.
My dad, a famous lawyer in his own right, we watched.
I love the show.
I've got all the DVDs that they've released.
Sometimes I'll spend some nostalgia time and watch.
But if I'm nominated for any position on any federal court, all I have to Supreme Court, the last thing I'm going to do is bone up on Perry Mason episodes.
This woman sounds boned up on Perry Mason.
She had to know this question is coming.
She starts answering it before Franken even finishes it.
Listen to it.
We're going to have round two, so I'll ask you some more questions there.
What was the one case in Perry Mason that Burger One?
I wish I remembered the name of the episode, but I don't.
I just was always struck that there was only one case where his client was actually guilty.
And you don't remember that case?
I know that I should remember the name of it, but I haven't looked at the episodes.
Can the White House prepare you for that?
Perry Mason lost one case.
Now, Sotomayor apparently has told somebody that that TV show was part of the mix that inspired her to want to go into law.
The fact is, Perry Mason was a defense lawyer.
She went into law as a prosecutor and then as a judge.
Why would she emulate?
I mean, the prosecutor in the Perry Mason series was Hamilton Berger, one of the biggest klutzes in the history of television mysteries.
Why would he never won a case?
His name was Ham Berger, Hamilton Berger.
Why in the world would you want to emulate a guy who never won a case?
Why in the world would you bone up on Perry Mason?
She knows.
She knows the questions coming from the Democrats, even from that clown, Senator Franken, who stole a Senate seat.
It's amazing.
It's a great country.
They recount the votes in Iran.
In a conflict over there, and Ahmedinezad gets more votes than he had in the original vote.
Just like in this country, Franken's 250 votes short, but the time they finished is 250 votes long.
Now, the state-run media is very upset.
They think that Lindsey Gramnesty has become a puppet of me.
And this, I think, is a great object lesson for Senator Graham.
Senator Graham has spent a lot of his time since he joined forces with Senator McCain, spent a lot of his time trying to curry favor with the liberals and the media by disagreeing with us in his own party and bashing us, distancing himself from us.
And after all of that, they still call him a puppet of Rush Limbaugh.
This is last night, Campbell Brown on CNN.
She's talking to, I don't know, Sam Sater.
I don't know how to pronounce his name.
I think it's Lindsey Graham, challenging the judge on her reputation among lawyers as a tough questioner.
What's going on here?
What Lindsey Graham is saying here is he's basically saying, I want to apologize to Rush Limbaugh for treating you so fairly yesterday and hope that the way I'm questioning him you now will put me back in his good graces.
And so I think that's his hope anyway.
So after all this, the Lindsey Graham joining forces with McCain, trying to curry favor with the state-run media, and all he does, he asked her one really good question.
Ma'am, you know, I couldn't say what you said and be sitting where you are.
So now all of a sudden he's out there trying to apologize to me for going soft the first day, trying to curry favor.
I'm sorry, Senator Graham, I didn't mean to do this to you.
But after all these years of trying to curry favor with these people, I think the liberals saying that he is a slave to me seems to maybe have gotten to Senator Graham a little bit.
This is this morning in Washington Senate Judiciary Committee hearing.
During his questioning, Graham had this exchange with Judge Soto Mayor.
You have come a long way.
You have worked very hard.
You have earned the respect of Ken Starr.
And I would like to put his statement in the record.
And you have said some things that just bugged the hell out of me.
Last question on the wise Latino woman comment.
To those who may be bothered by that, what do you say?
I regret that I have offended some people.
I believe that my life demonstrates that that was not my intent to leave the impression that some have taken from my words.
You know what, Judge?
I agree with you.
Good luck.
Well, I don't think Lindsey Graham's trying to curry favor, trying to curry favor with me here.
She said that phrase four or five times over a period of as many years in various speeches.
It's not subject to misinterpretation.
It's who she is.
And I got to take a break, but we've got the audio soundbites, a couple audio soundbites of unhappy leftist legal beagles with Sotomayor's unwillingness to come forth and be an honest copy babe.
Okay, to the phones we go.
It's Open Line Friday on Thursday today.
We're going to start in North Hills, California.
Suzanne, great to have you with us.
Hello.
Good morning, Rush.
I wanted to start by apologizing.
I always thought you were a loudmouth lowhard, sadly, until I saw your national address on C-SPAN.
And after that moment, I was a convert.
My mother and my brother have been trying to drag me to the dark side for the longest time.
And all I kept seeing was, what is wrong with this man?
When I finally saw you, on top of the fact that you're adorable.
It was entertaining.
It was informative.
It was something that I should have been listening to years ago, and they were right, which I hate admitting.
So I wanted to apologize to start with.
And the next time you're in L.A., I'd love to take you to dinner.
And we can write it off.
That is, where's the North Hills, California, by the way?
Near Northridge, north of Los Angeles.
Northridge.
You know, it's very interesting that you were, well, I'm not surprised you were converted off the CPAC speech, but did you see it per se?
Yes.
Yes.
Okay, yes.
You didn't see media clips of it.
You saw this.
No, no, I saw this.
No, I saw this.
What did you believe prior to that and why?
Sadly, I work in the legal field, so I'm surrounded by Democrats and liberals, except for one conservative, and she's at the other end of the office.
So all I hear is the same liberal media crap and the same butt-licking.
Wait a minute.
Are you a liberal at the same time you're hanging around with all the liberal crap?
God, no.
No, I'm a staunch Republican.
Okay, you're really.
It's just that I happened to catch you every time I'd step in the room and they had you on, it was at a point where you were self-stroking yourself.
And it was like, oh, my God, what is wrong with this man?
I don't know that I have ever done that on the radio.
Ah.
Well, since I don't have a webcam, I can't be sure.
But when you talk about, you know, how intelligent, how bright, and on and on you went, and I went, you know, he's starting to sound like the Democrats.
Until I, like I said, when I saw it on C-SPAN, the way you came across, it was the amount of information that I got without, usually when I listen to a lot of the subjects you cover, I get so angry, not at you, but at what, how stupid the bulk of the people seem to be.
You know, I got an email today, and this probably will reflect similarly on your experience.
And I get these so often that I think that they are seminar emails actually sent in by liberals lying to me, pretending to be conservatives in hopes of depressing me.
I'm too strong for that.
I got a note today from a guy who said, all right, yesterday I finally convinced my girlfriend to listen to you.
Finally, it's taken me years.
And what did you start with?
Obama throwing like a girl.
And she said, see, this guy is an egg.
I don't know what you do with it.
And the guys lamented, why?
I took me years to get her to listen.
And you start where the Obama throws like a girl.
But he does.
I know.
I know.
They got to get into some manly sports because he comes across as a moron and he can't think for himself, much less speak for himself.
And he sure as hell doesn't speak for me or the rest of this country.
You know, this is amazing to me.
This is really enlightening to me because here you are.
You are me.
You are me.
And you hated my guts before you saw that CPAC speech.
I said I was sorry.
I'm sincere for the most part.
It's an ulterior motive.
I just wanted to ask you out for dinner.
I'm attached.
I must be honest.
I didn't say I wanted to take you home.
I just said to dinner.
She can come along.
I don't care.
What I really wanted was to pick your brain more is to hear more about.
Oh.
And I wanted to take you to a Republican-dominated restaurant.
I'm sorry, a liberal.
Where?
Where in Northridge?
No, it's in Sherman Oaks on Ventura Boulevard.
And the bulk of what I hear is, Obama's so fabulous, and healthcare is what we need.
And the voice for the children.
Look, I've got to ask you one more question.
I've got limited time here.
Why, if you are as conservative as you, why, and knowing the media is who they, why did you believe what these admitted liberals were saying about me?
Oh, I didn't believe what they said.
It's just, it's one of those things where you have selective hearing.
It's fine that you just tune it out completely.
It's like, I don't have to listen to you.
I don't have to listen to them.
But then I, like I said, to see you, now I listen to you.
I listen to you at work and I leave the radio up.
Some people won't come in my office now, but that's okay.
Well, I gotta thanks for the invitation, Suzanne.
I appreciate it.
What a nice first call I have.
Really like a brief time out here.
We'll be back after this.
Stay with us.
Man, all kinds of examples of soda myore word slips.
She called the NLRB the National Labor Relationships Board in a conversation with Chuck Yu Schumer.
Now, that has to be a chick thing.
The National Labor Relationships Board.
Anyway, we'll be right back.
▲
Export Selection