All Episodes
Previous Next
July 13, 2009 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:39
July 13, 2009, Monday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
On the cutting edge of societal evolution, Rush Limbaugh, the Excellence in Broadcasting Network, and the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies, here I am meeting and surpassing all audience expectations every day while executing assigned host duties flawlessly.
Zero mistakes so far.
Dawn, that orgasm story, that's a UK story, right?
Yeah, I've got it in a stack.
I got a story in one of the UK newspapers that is very healthy for an orgasm a day.
They're teaching this to kids in the UK.
We'll have details also.
This New York Times story that came up on Sunday about Cheney and the CIA and a secret plan.
This is classic.
The plan was never implemented.
It was a secret plan, Cheney and the CIA, basically to target al-Qaeda operatives.
And now everybody's having a cow over Cheney doing something secret and not telling anybody about it.
And all this is, is an attempt to give cover for Nancy Pelosi.
The story is that there has been a plan since 2001 to target and capture and kill al-Qaeda leaders, 9-11, 2001.
And Leon Panetta ended it when he found out.
That's the story.
The story, the Democrats ended it.
That's what everybody needs to know when it comes to the Democrats' national security and foreign policy.
I mean, this is just absurd.
Wall Street Journal, CIA had a plan to capture and kill al-Qaeda.
Well, we should hope so.
I mean, what the hell else would you do after 9-11?
Doesn't that seem sort of like a natural flow?
We lose the World Trade Center, part of the Pentagon, and people on a plane in Pennsylvania, and so we implement a plan with the CIA to capture and kill al-Qaeda.
I would sure as hell hope that's what was happening.
Now, the revelation that this is the plan that the Democrats were pretending to be so outraged about, and this is, you know, this is the New York Times story.
The New York Times story did not say what the plan was.
Secret CIA plan.
Go get Cheney.
Let's chase Cheney again.
All this does, this confirms that this is just nothing more than an attempt to cover up Pelosi's lies about her waterboarding briefings.
That's all this story's purpose is, is to give her cover.
And perhaps to further the cause that Eric Holder has announced, he wants to go back and actually prosecute Bush administrations for war crimes because of torture.
Folks, that doesn't happen in the United States of America.
Administrations change.
They go into the past.
The current one leads to the future.
It's in banana republics and totalitarian dictatorships where you go back and criminally prosecute your predecessors for the purpose of seeing to it that they never surface again.
So here you have, this is how far Pelosi and the Democrats will go to protect themselves.
And the media, by the way, protect their ruling elites.
Now, they're getting back into gear here with the Sodomayor hearings.
I'm watching at Sturdley's office during the break as the senators are getting together behind the hearing desk, all talking with one another.
And I see Al Franken talking to Arlen Specter.
And I looked at Sturdley.
Don't tell me Franken's on the Judiciary Committee.
And it's thirdly says that Al Franken is on the Judiciary Committee.
Now, I had a policy during all these years, never mentioning Franken's name.
He did this horribly poor talk show.
You don't mention, you just don't talk about people so far down in the food chain.
All you do is elevate them up.
Well, I don't know how I'm going to avoid talk about Al Franken.
I say he's going to get a rant this afternoon on Sotomayor.
Well, you know, you're going to hear a lot of talk this week about the appropriate role of judges in America.
And the Republicans are doing a great, great job of this so far this morning.
Now, you've already heard the BAMSTER tell us every good thing about Soto Mayor and how judges, including her, should take empathy and their own life experiences into consideration when deciding cases.
That is exactly the opposite of the Founding Fathers' view of the legal system.
It certainly takes away the notion of following the Constitution and written law as the standards on which to base a decision.
Now, it's time like these that the Heritage Foundation offers a whole lot of insight and something special for their members, too.
Tomorrow night, Tuesday evening, Heritage Foundation members are going to be treated to an exclusive informational conference phone call with former Attorney General Ed Mees and Senator Jim DeMint.
Both of them have inside perspectives on what to expect in the coming days and what it means regarding the Soto Mayor nomination.
You get invited to participate in such events when you are a member of Heritage.
You can become a member for as little as $25.
Just go to askheritage.org and sign up today, become a member, and take part in tomorrow evening's get-together on the phone with Ed Meese and Senator DeMint.
And Ed Meese is brilliant.
Ed Meese is one of these guys who was pilloried and lambasted during the Reagan years, but he is a brilliant scholar.
He's at Heritage, Jim DeMint, of course, as well.
So you want to find out the insider view of all of this as a member at askheritage.org.
You can listen in on the conference call tomorrow night as Ed Meese and Jim DeMint speak directly to you as a Heritage Foundation member.
So the web address there again is askheritage.org.
Now, I mentioned the plan.
Panetta canceled the plan.
That's the story.
This plan, by the way, this Cheney CIA plan was never implemented.
It was just, you would hope there'd be this kind of plan.
It was never implemented.
And they just found out about it.
Somebody's leaking this for the purpose of covering up Pelosi.
And Panetta, this is the big deal, New York Times on Sunday, Panetta made a big deal of canceling it.
That's the story.
The story is a Democrat CIA director cancels a plan to pursue al-Qaeda operatives while we're in Afghanistan doing just that.
Now, all this is just for show and to provide an entree for these people to head back into Cheney territory and to try to get at him.
Audio sound bites before we go to the break.
Colin Powell, State of the Union, Sunday, July 5th on CNN John King.
Let me ask you first if you know Judge Soto Mayor.
No, I do not.
She seems like a very gifted and accomplished woman.
She certainly has an open and liberal bent of mind, but that's not disqualifying.
But she seems to have a judicial record that seems to be balanced and tries to follow the law.
And so I hope we do have a spirited set of hearings.
What we can't continue to have is to have somebody like a Judge Sotomayar, who is announced and based on one simple, tricky, but nonetheless case that the Supreme Court has now decided, have her called a racist or reverse racist.
And she ought to withdraw her nomination because we're mad at her.
Can you understand?
He's just, well, I know he's shameless, James, but he's got me on the brain.
I mean, who else called her a racist and reverse race?
Newt called her a racist, and he pulled it back.
I called her racist and bigot and stuck with it.
And a reverse racist.
Balanced?
Sodomayor is balanced?
She's overturned all the time.
The only people overturned more than Sodomayor is the Ninth Circus Court of Appeals in San Francisco.
What else did he say?
She certainly has an open and liberal bent of mind, but that's not disqualifying.
She seems to have a judicial record, seems to be balanced, tries to follow the law.
Tries.
Tries.
Hey, hey, hey, she's doing it.
She's trying out there.
Let's put her on a place where nobody can overrule her.
Nobody can overrule this woman once she gets there.
We're stuck with her.
A poor woman denied the classics at Cardinals Bellman High School.
Based on one simple, tricky, but nonetheless case that the Supreme Court's now, nothing tricky about it.
He's talking about the Ricci firefighter case.
Have her called a racist.
That's not why we call her a racist because she said that she hoped a white Latina would have a far richer experience than your average white guy.
I'll tell you what, let me try this.
You know what?
I'd have been a better Secretary of Defense and a better Secretary of State because I'm a white guy and I have a better understanding of the history of this country and national defense than Colin Powell.
You think I'd be called a racist?
Yes, I would.
I would be called a racist if I'd said that, and I would be.
If I'd said I'm better than Colin Powell because I'm white and he's black, I'd be called a racist.
So why does she get a pass?
She said she's better because she's Latina.
The average white guy.
Words mean things, folks.
I know that political correctness requires us to be balanced and to dance around these things so that we can appear to be moderate and of even temperament and so forth.
Well, let's move on.
Another sound I've hear from General Secretary Powell, John King, you wrote in your book some time ago, never in the two years I worked with Ronald Reagan and George Bush did I detect the slightest trace of racial prejudice in their behavior.
They led a party, however, whose principal message to black Americans seemed to be lift yourself up by your bootstraps.
As General Powell did, by the way, until he met Reagan, who then pulled Powell up by his bootstraps.
Some did not have boots, which is why they couldn't pull themselves up by bootstraps.
I wish that Reagan and Bush had shown more sensitivity on this point.
Okay, so here's Colin Powell going after the two people that elevated him to the highest position in his life.
I wish that Reagan and Bush had shown more sensitivity on this point.
Let's fast forward to where we are today.
Does the Republican Party have that sensitivity you wish it had now?
When you have non-elected officials, such as we have in our party, Limbo, who immediately shout racism.
Or somebody who is quite prominent in the media says that the only basis upon which I could possibly have supported Obama was because he was black and I was black, even though I laid out my judgment on the candidates.
Then we still have a problem.
The guy who used the term reverse racism, that's Rush Limbaugh.
And he has said some not-so-favorable things about you.
Mr. Limbaugh, of course, is entitled to his opinion, but he's not on any membership committee.
He doesn't decide who I am or what I am, no more than I decide who he is or what he is.
So we've had this running debate, let's call it that.
And he's entitled his opinion on the title of mine.
Now, I, as Mr. Limbaugh, as Mr. Limbaugh, I'm not deciding who or what Colin Powell is.
He is.
I'm merely observing.
Now, he laid out his judgment on the candidates.
I guess we then have to ask, I don't think John King did, I didn't see the show.
I was already on the vacation trip.
But had I, Rush Limbaugh, been the host, I would have said, well, what is it about Obama's policies that you now staunchly support?
Are you in favor of the stimulus leading us to 9.5% unemployment?
Do you agree with President Obama, General Powell, when he apologizes for this country on every international trip?
Do you believe, General Powell, that we need to have a single-payer national health care system?
Do you believe, General Powell, that the United States government should own automobile companies?
Colin Powell was a Republican, is a Republican.
John McCain was the ideal Colin Powell candidate.
And yet he endorsed, not just endorsed, but strategically announced the endorsement at a time of Obama designed to inflict the most harm on the candidate of his own party.
Why this?
So I said, I think he feels he'd face a lot of heat if, as a black man, he didn't support the first black candidate for president of the United States.
Race was what else it could be.
I guess I'm going to get in more trouble here, but I don't get it.
The state-run media continues, and even several Republican media commentators, I think, totally, continue to totally misread and misunderstand Sarah Palin.
Here's a state-run media montage where the state-run media basically say that Sarah Palin is me in a skirt.
Maybe she just wants to be, rather than president, the next Rush Limbaugh.
I think she will co-host with Rush Limbaugh.
She could potentially be the next Rush Limbaugh of the party.
I don't think it precludes her trying to run, like Rush Limbaugh wielded great influence.
She'll be the next Rush Limbaugh.
Is her future as Rush Limbaugh in a skirt?
They get on these themes, they get on these, well, these themes, and they all adopt them.
Now, the well, here's one more angry amitchil theme here in Washington.
This was on Meet the Press yesterday morning.
David Gregory said, This is a question I post Senator McCain, which is, is shirking from those fights the way you demonstrate leadership in the Republican Party?
I think that is her big flaw right now.
She's feisty.
She's attractive.
Lord knows she's attractive.
But she has to have a coherent worldview to be the Republican nominee.
And the reason why she was so rambling in that Friday statement and didn't really fix it in her interviews with many of us is that she doesn't, she's not deeply read.
He hasn't thought through a lot of these policies, and you have to do that.
Okay.
And I hear this from a lot of people on our side, too, primarily women.
Primarily women.
And I think many of them have been in Washington too long.
Lord knows she's attractive.
That's the rub.
That's the rub.
That's, well, it's not the whole rub, but it's part of what grates on them.
Trust me, my friends.
Trust me.
When your poster chick is Barbara Mikulski, you get the drift.
Now, your poster chick is Nancy Pelosi.
I don't care.
Pick one.
But this whole notion of, I'm sure Obama's well-read too, right?
And Obama's running around apologizing for the United States every chance he gets.
What's the point of being well-read?
This whole, this is an effort to say she's unsophisticated.
She's not properly refined.
She's not from the schools of thought that everybody in Washington considers to be important.
Now, I have no clue what she's going to do.
I don't know anybody who does besides her.
We got a Washington Post story that says she's going to go out and campaign for conservative Democrats.
When I watched her speech, when she announced that she was leaving the governorship of Alaska, I didn't hear the word Republican mentioned once.
If I'm Sarah Palin, conservative, Republican Party's been just as mean-spirited to her as the Democrats have.
A lot of them have.
A lot of the Republican media, a lot of the so-called conservative media have been.
I don't know if she's going to campaign for conservative Democrats, but if she believes that conservatism is the way to go.
The one thing that does slightly worry me about this is that this whole third party business.
Yeah, it's remote, but it's still a possibility out there.
There are a lot of people pushing a third party.
And that's third parties, they lose.
They just lose.
Third parties never end up with a congressional or senate candidates.
It's not just not the way to go.
But we'll save that for later if that actually begins to transpire.
We see it beginning to transpire.
The bottom line is she and her.
You ought to read Willie Brown in the San Francisco Chronicle yesterday.
Willie Brown says she's just outsmarting everyone.
Her instincts, American thinker, I think Thomas Lipson wrote about it too, Willie Brown's analysis of this.
She's just steps ahead of everybody strategically, doesn't fit any cookie-cutter mold, which is exactly what's necessary.
But also, just from a standpoint of personal responsibility as governor, she has been distracted with over a half million dollars of ethics charges.
None of them are true.
She is having to spend most of her time defending herself.
At the same time, let's say that she does have future political aspirations.
As a Republican, or as anybody else, all of her supposed opponents do not have day jobs.
Let's look at the Republicans.
You have the ones we think are out there, Huckabee, Romney.
We hear Christ, and he is a day job.
Sanford's gone.
By the way, has he been in the news lately?
He hasn't.
He's probably thinking Michael Jackson and this soda my horse stuff.
But if she's going to compete, she's got to come down here.
She's got to come to the lower 48.
She's got to do television.
These guys can do it anytime they want.
And if she's being distracted from serving as governor, she can overcome this quitting business depending on what she does between now and then.
She continues to intrigue me politically.
I don't have any idea what she's going to do other than try to make some money right off the bat.
We'll be back.
Stay with us.
Okay, it's been a while since we've been to the phones, so we're going to fix that.
We're going to go to phones now to Richfield, Florida.
This is Terry.
Great to have you on the EIB network, sir.
Hello.
Hello, Rush.
Yeah.
Yeah, this is Brooksville, Florida.
Yeah.
Richville, did you say?
Brooksville.
All right.
I may as well say Brooksville, Iowa, then, since Snurdy got Richfield wrong, we'll just go.
So Brooksfield, Florida.
How close is it to Port St. Lucie?
About 150 miles, I guess.
But welcome back.
I want to tell you, welcome back anyhow.
And you touched on something that I wanted to talk about.
And while Obama was over in Africa and talking about talking to the leaders over there about corruptness in the government and stuff, and I kind of laughed, I thought it was kind of ironic because he has the people like the Acorn people over here.
And maybe he can get them some jobs over there, baby.
Maybe that's the job.
Yeah, here's what Terry is referring to.
Obama said, no country.
Now get this, folks.
While in Ghana, no country is going to create wealth if its leaders exploit the economy to enrich themselves or if police can be bought off by drug traffickers.
No business wants to invest in a place where the government skims 20% off the top or the head of the port authority is corrupt.
No person wants to live in a society where the rule of law gives way to the rule of brutality and bribery.
Well, folks, I'm going to tell you what, our government's soon going to be skimming 51% off the top of everything we make.
What does that make, Obama?
Obama just kneecapped the auto industry.
He put the United Auto Workers in charge on the board of directors and made them owners.
What the hell is that?
He kneecapped an entire industry.
He said, that's not democracy.
That's tyranny, even if occasionally you sprinkle an election in there.
He said, now is the time for that style of corrupt governance to end.
Well, the last I looked, Obama just ordered the Justice Department to drop election intimidation charges against the new Black Panthers.
He is funneling billions in tax dollars to Acorn, which is a criminal enterprise, if widespread illegality in voter registration means anything.
This is a speech he could have made to Americans.
He gave a speech to Ghana that he could have made to Americans.
This speech was given to make Obama look like he's for democracy, freedom, and the rule of law, low taxes, economic growth.
And he wasn't even speaking to Ghana.
You know, his primary audience was right here, his primary audience here at home.
He wants to govern like the people he is lecturing.
Obama wants to govern like an African colonial.
So he needs cover.
This speech paints Obama as something he is not.
No country is going to create wealth.
We're not creating wealth if its leaders exploit the economy to enrich themselves.
You can exploit the economy to enrich yourself politically, maybe not financially.
And that's what Obama and the Democrats are doing.
They are exploiting our economy.
Are destroying it to enrich themselves politically.
Bought off, police can be bought off by drug traffickers.
Well, I don't want to compare the new Black Panther to this, but I mean, they engage in voter intimidation, and Eric Holder drops the charge.
Now, we're going to look at that.
Acorn gets $4.8 billion in stimulus money.
This lecture that Obama gave in Ghana had its primary audience right here in home.
This speech paints Obama to be something he's not.
Why wasn't this speech given in Russia?
I mean, you got because he wanted out of there alive.
Why didn't he give this speech in Russia?
Why not give this speech in Cairo?
No, Obama goes to a poor African country, and he used the poor African country for a prop.
If Obama's really been out of the shape, been out of shape, all these things that he lists, he would not have waited to give a speech like this.
He's had opportunities in several other countries to talk about economic growth, creation of wealth.
So telling Africa to end tyranny and corruption is just cover.
Ladies and gentlemen, for an American audience who will hear him give that speech, oh, Obama wants to create wealth.
He wants to preserve the United States, as we've always known it.
He's trying to get Africa to follow in our footsteps.
Oh, what a great guy.
It's to insulate him from any association or attachment to the current economic crisis.
Larry Summers.
I don't think the worst is over.
He's one of Obama's top economic advisors.
I don't think the worst is over.
This is a story in the Financial Times.
I don't think the worst is over.
Of course it isn't.
But why did the president tell Americans to hurry and buy stock a few months ago?
Why did he say in Los Angeles the economy had stepped back from the brink?
A few quotes from one of the several thousand advisors or czars Obama has on his bloated payroll that produces crap when we need gold.
Ladies and gentlemen, the man who brings us sleet instead of sunny days, Larry Summers, says this.
I don't think the worst is over.
It's very likely more jobs will be lost.
It would not be surprising if the gross domestic product has not yet reached its low.
What does appear to be true is that the sense of panic in the markets and free fall of the economy has subsided, and one does not have the sense of a situation as out of control as a few months ago, although it's going to get better.
It's going to get worse.
Now, the Federal Reserve, whether you love them or hate them, expanded the money supply and the panic subsided.
Unfortunately, instead of reducing government public sector spending and cutting taxes, Obama did the exact opposite.
So instead of seeing job creation now, we have more job losses ahead of us and a contracting economy instead of growth.
Obama's bleeding the private sector.
He's running up enormous debt in order to guarantee the old economy never fully recovers.
For those who doubt this from the Financial Times, this new American economy, Summers hopes, will be more export-oriented and less consumption-oriented, more environmentally-oriented and less energy production-oriented, more bio and software and civil engineering-oriented and less financial engineering-oriented.
Finally, more middle-class-oriented and less oriented to income growth that is disproportionate towards a very small share of the population.
Unlike many other economists, Summers does not believe that lower growth is the inevitable price of this economic.
Well, Larry Summers just told the Financial Times what Obama's economic plans are.
He is totally remaking the U.S. economy, command and control from Washington.
Less oriented to income growth that is disproportionate towards a very small share of the population.
It's none of their business what anybody in this country earns.
But they do have a pesar.
Now, interestingly here, Robert Samuelson, one of my favorite economists, he's not as favorite of mine as Professor Hazlet.
We all know Professor Hazlett, but Robert Samuelson writes a column now and then for the Washington Post and in Newsweek.
And his Newsweek piece in the July 20th issue is entitled How the Mighty Have Fallen.
The rich really aren't like you and me.
They are historically recession-proof, but this time they've been hit hard.
And we may all be the poorer for it, he said.
That's the theme of his piece.
With secure jobs and ample incomes, the rich and the near-rich are supposed to be insulated from economic slumps.
Well, not this time.
Many feel fearful, threatened, and impoverished.
Collateral damage is widespread.
Sales at luxury chains have fallen sharply.
Same-store revenues for Saks, Fifth Avenue, and Neiman Marcus dropped 25% in recent quarters.
Many country clubs are struggling to hold members.
Yes.
In New York's Hamptons, unsold homes reached a 34-month supply early this year at the prevailing sales price.
Buyers had hibernated.
Economist Susan Stern, a specialist in consumer spending, calls it the demise of luxury.
The people who buy $3,000 Gucci handbags, you see it in the luxury car market and housing.
The stereotype of the rich living mainly off dividends and interest income is increasingly outdated.
Many of the wealthy are owners of smaller businesses whose well-being is to some extent hostage to the business cycle.
The criticism usually presumes that if the rich and the near-rich get less, somebody else will get more.
You know, the old zero-sum game.
Redistribution achieves a better social balance.
Sometimes that happens, but sometimes when the rich get less, no one else gets more.
Regardless of how the rich earn their money trading bonds, performing surgery, or starting new companies, providing legal work, it's no longer so lucrative.
The rich get poorer, but no one else gets richer and society is worse off.
And that's what he's nailed, without saying it, what Obama is out for.
A tenth of American families in 2004 made nearly half of all charitable gifts.
That's going to be cut back, not to mention because of the wealth, but the tax deduction is going to go away for charity.
George W. Bush's favorable tax changes, but cheering at its eclipse may be premature and misguided.
The contradiction is that many of the large gains at the top, rich incomes that are routinely deplored, also provide the economic fuel for desired spending at the bottom.
If the rich, however defined, remain stuck in neutral, the overall economy may not do much better.
Robert Samuelson.
Now, he doesn't say so, but this is exactly what the Obama people have in mind.
And he makes a brilliant point.
Everybody thinks if you raise taxes on the rich, somehow that money is going to end up back in the pie, and the middle class is going to get richer.
That's not going to happen.
That's not how it is.
This money is being taken out of the economy.
It's being spent.
Ten years down the line, it's money that's not even been earned or printed yet is being spent.
Quick timeout.
Back after this with much more.
We now go back to the phones, 800-282-2882.
If you'd like to join us, although there's no time left for you to get through today, so don't bother calling.
Doug in Paradise Valley, Arizona.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
It's a privilege to talk to you.
Thank you very much, sir.
I'm a senior in college, and my freshman year, I had to write a paper on somebody past or present that we would like to spend a day with that has influenced our life, but not only our life, our society and culture.
And some students chose people like Benjamin Franklin and Abraham Lincoln, and I chose you, and I got the highest grade in the class.
And the professor told the class that you may be the most influential person of our time.
And ever since then, I've tried to figure out how I could spend a day with you.
And you always tell us that we live in America, and we can do anything we want if we work hard and try hard.
So ever since I wrote the paper, I've been saving my money, and I now have enough money saved up to purchase a skybox to watch the Arizona Cardinals.
And I'd like to invite you to watch the football game with me in the skybox.
You have earned enough money now.
Wait a minute.
You're a senior in high school.
Yeah, so.
Or college.
In college.
Since my freshman year, I've been saving up money because I figured, you know, Rush always tells us we can do anything if we try hard and work hard.
And you, in four years, have saved enough money to get a skybox at University of Phoenix Field for one game, right?
Not a season.
No, for one game.
One game.
Those things are not cheap.
You have been saving lots of money.
You've been working hard.
I have been working hard.
And you want to invite me to one of those games?
I do.
It would be an honor to be able to watch a football game with you.
Well, you know, the problem with that is, the problem with that is, is that when you invite me to a football game, you can't talk to me.
I'm watching football.
We're not discussing Sotomayor or Obama where we're talking football.
So I have a better idea.
Okay.
I have a better idea.
Do you still have your essay?
I do, yes.
That you got the highest grade.
By the way, what university did you attend?
Arizona State University.
Yeah, a professor at Arizona State gave you a high grade on a paper about me?
Well, it was in the ⁇ I'm a finance major.
It was in the business program, and I think that that's why they're a little bit more conservative in the business program.
No, not necessarily.
But that's still interesting.
And the professor, why do you think you've got a higher grade than anybody else other than the quality of your work?
Why do you think?
Well, because I wrote how you have influenced our society and culture so much, and you do it in a way that people can relate to, and you teach people common sense and how to look at each issue.
And, you know, everything that you do on a daily basis for the people of America.
I mean, it's unbelievable.
Hmm.
Hmm.
That's fascinating.
I'm flattered, and I thank you very much.
Here's what I want to do.
I want you to give Mr. Snerdley at the end of this call, so don't hang up, either an email address or a phone number where we can reach you.
Okay.
All right.
Because you've been saving all this money for this, basically because I told you you could.
And you've chosen a football game because you know I love football and so forth.
But there may be a better way for you to spend some, but not all.
What is this?
Give me a ballpark.
What does this skybox cost for a game?
It's over $10,000.
Over $10,000, did you say?
Yeah, I have a better idea where you wouldn't spend all of that money.
Snurdy, that's pretty $10,000 a day to run eight games, $80,000.
It's pretty right on the money if they did unsold ones that they leased on a daily basis, on a game basis.
Anyway, I got to run here, Doug.
But you don't hang up.
Snurdy will get your email address and phone number, and we at the EIB network will be in touch.
I just checked email.
Grush, you got to go to the game with the young man.
The young man wants to go to the game with you.
He saved up the money for a skybox.
I got a way that he can do, he can go to the game, but well, we're working on a plan here for Doug out in Arizona.
I may go to the game.
I don't know, folks.
But I've not rejected it.
We're just going around with ideas here.
But sounds like a great guy.
This guy has.
I know, I know.
The professor said I may be one of the most influential.
That's Arizona State.
You know, that's incredible.
Anyway, it's great to be back here, folks.
We have to split out of here.
See you tomorrow.
▲
Export Selection