All Episodes
Previous Next
July 3, 2009 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:47
July 3, 2009, Friday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hi, welcome back, Rush Limbaugh behind the golden EIB microphone here as we celebrate Dependence Day.
Well, sadly, some people celebrate it as Dependence Day.
It's actually Independence Day.
That's tomorrow.
Many people getting a head start on the weekend today, but we aren't.
Live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida.
It's open line Friday.
And when we go to the phones, you own the content of the program.
Whatever you want to talk about, fine, I'll fake it if I don't care about it.
800 282-2882 if you want to be on the program today.
The email address, L Rushbow at EIB net.com.
Last hour I spoke of this chart.
Employment unemployment chart.
Every recession since uh what is it?
Let me get the year here.
Since World War II.
To the present.
You know when I was talking about the V charts.
Some they're not actually all V's.
There are some U's.
It's not a dramatic increase when the when the uptick in jobs happens.
Anyway, I have posted that chart at Rush Limbaugh.com.
You should see it now.
It's from BusinessInsiders.com.
And the thing to look at is that is every recession has an end.
And you can clearly see it on this chart.
In terms of we're talking employment versus unemployment.
And when the employment uptick begins, it's dramatic.
And there's a reason that it happens in each case, if you know history.
And then you'll find the color of the line for this recession is bright red, and it just is still plunging.
There's no hint of any kind of an uptick whatsoever.
So it's there for one and all to see, even though you probably don't need to see it since I did superb job of describing it to you, but I'm sure that when you look at it, it's just exactly like Rush talked about.
Which is one of the many elements of magic.
Part of the content of this program.
Now, Colin Powell, I've been wondering.
During all of this job loss and all of this expansion of government, where are Colin Powell and Tom Ridge?
You know, Colin Powell and Tom Ridge have both said that I'm not I'm not any good for the Republican Party.
And uh people saying, yeah, we need Colin Powell.
He's he's the ideal Republican.
A guy who endorsed and voted for Obama.
I'm saying, where are these people?
I mean, do they I I guess by their silence, they support what's going on here.
They support every job gained in the last nine years being lost.
They support rampant inflation that's just done.
They am they they support government-run single payer health care.
They want this tax and tax and and trade stuff.
Because I haven't heard Powell or Tom Ridge voice any concerns about any of this.
The only thing I hear them voicing concerns about is me.
Well, Colin Powell has spoken out.
They've got another interview at CNN and are promoting it, releasing portions of it today.
He's going to appear on State of the Union someday with the host John King.
But let's to set this up.
Let's go back to the 1996 Republican convention in San Diego to listen to Colin Powell back when he was a Republican.
I became a Republican because I believe, like you, that the federal government has become too large and too intrusive in our lives.
We can no longer, we can no longer afford solutions to our problems that result in more entitlements, higher taxes to pay for them, more bureaucracy to run them, and fewer results to show for it.
Right on, right on right.
Now, I happen to still believe that.
Colin Powell said last fall Americans want more government and they want higher taxes.
And I'm accused of being the problem.
He's the one who's changed, and he has he has abandoned Republicanism, conservatism, he's joined hip to hip with Obama, and I am the problem.
They gotta get me out of the Republican Party to save the Republican Party.
They need to him get him back in it to save it, because he's left it.
Maybe not officially, but he's endorsing and voting for Obama.
So, I mean, 96.
Standing ovations, great speech she gave defined Reaganism and conservatism pretty well.
That's all gone.
So let's now move forward to this coming Sunday.
John King says to Colin Powell, uh, when it comes to spending and the reach and the role of government, has the president met the test laid out by Colin Powell in 1996?
First, let me say that was a pretty good statement, I thought.
And I believe in all those things.
But I also believe that we should have a government that works.
I don't like slogans uh anymore like limited government.
That's not the right answer.
The right answer is give me a government that works.
Keep it as small as possible.
Keep the tax burden on the American people as small as possible, but at the same time have government that is solving the problems of the people.
People want their problems solved.
And very often it's government that has to do that.
So let's have good government, effective government, whether you call it limited or not.
Now I think one of the challenges that President Obama has now is that he's got so many things on the table, and these are issues that the American people find important, health care and so many other issues.
But I think uh one of the cautions that has to be given to the president, and uh I've I've talked to some of his people uh about this, is that you can't have so many things on the table that you can't absorb it all, and we can't pay for it all.
Now, ladies and gentlemen, there's one word that describes that soundbite.
One word that describes General Powell in that sound bite, and that is incoherent.
See, John King played for him that portion of the 1996 speech at the convention.
Well, we played it last month.
We played it, we quoted it last month.
John King plays it for General Powell to get his reaction.
Well, first let me say that's a pretty good statement, I thought, and I believe in all those things.
But I also believe we should have a government that works.
Uh this is he's learned well from Obama.
I stand by my thing in 96.
I that was greatly brilliant about what I said in 96, that was that was a really great statement.
But, but, but there's always the but the other hand.
We need a government that works.
Is this one working?
Is this a government that is working?
And how how is it when you say in 1996 you want a government that's uh that you don't like a government to become too large and too intrusive in our lives, how do you go from that to people want a government to solve their problems?
That's not what government does.
Government doesn't solve people's problems.
I mean, it may be in a broad context, but that problem solving is up to you.
It's up to family, church, community, what have you.
Now, government can solve problems that it creates by removing the problems it's created, usually by virtue of its size.
So he says he's for limited government.
Then in the same bite, then he goes back and says, but I'm for limited government, but I'm for a government that works.
This is incoherent.
It depends on where he is speaking as to what he is going to say.
Here's the next bite.
He continued with this.
I never would have believed that we would have budgets that are running into the you know multi-trillions of dollars, and we are amassing a huge, huge national debt that if we don't pay for in our lifetime, our kids and grandkids and great-grandchildren will have to pay for it.
So I think the president, as he moves forward with his initiatives, has to start really taking very, very hard look at what the cost of all of this is, and how much additional bureaucracy and will it be effective bureaucracy be needed to make all of this happen.
So it's early, but you're a little worried.
That's a fair way to put it?
Yeah.
I'm a little concerned.
Concerned to be a better way.
I'm concerned at the number of programs that are being presented, the bills associated with these programs, and the additional government that'll be needed to execute them.
You told us this is what the American people wanted.
You endorsed this.
Everything Obama's doing, he said he was going to do.
We have played the sound bites on cap and trade.
We've played the sound bites on health care.
We've read the excerpts from his books, where he forecasts the reality that is his administration.
President, I think uh President needs to uh be told, uh President Nice, uh we can't pay for a president.
he's doing it.
Gosh, I'll tell you folks.
If it weren't so serious, it'd be comical.
And it's both, actually.
Well, I have to I have to say this too.
Because remember, the real reason, ladies and gentlemen, the real reason.
General Powell is taking after me is because shortly after he endorsed Obama, I said there's really really one reason for this, and that's race.
There can't be any other reason.
He just doesn't see how it's possible not to get on the bandwagon of the first black president campaign in the in the history of the country.
And of course, that is and was an obvious truth.
Only I, the courageous L. Rushbo, dared say it.
And I caught grief for it, which par for the course.
But that's why he's really mad at me.
But I would now say, uh, ladies and gentlemen, we go back to we listen to General Powell in 96, then we listen to a f l listen to him affirm in a soundbite coming up Sunday that, yeah, that's that sound bite in 96 that when I said it's a convention, I could still agree with that.
And then in the third soundbite, we hear him express concern over the debt and the spending, and the president must realize as he goes forth with his initiatives that yada.
Isn't it obvious that policy had nothing to do with General Powell's endorsement of Obama?
Isn't it obvious now in his own words?
Because now he's deeply troubled by what's happened, even though he damn well knew it was gonna happen.
Obama wasn't hiding any of this.
He was hiding it with his rhetoric, but if you listened, if you got the right sound bites, if you got read the texts, the right speeches, none of this is a surprise to any of us.
This is why we're so outraged that so many people got fooled by it, because it was all out there.
So if it wasn't policy that inspired General Powell's endorsement of Obama, I ax.
What could it be?
What could the remaining reason be?
And I still say race.
Back in just a moment.
Stay with us.
One more thing before we get back to the phones.
General Powell was on notice long ago.
As to where President Obama intended to take the country, I have a Reuters story right here.
My formerly nicotine-stained fingers, it is from November 17th, last year.
Last year, as athletes say.
Any athlete will say last year.
The United States government should not worry about deficits over the next two years while spending money to jumpstart the ailing economy.
President elect Obama said in a TV interview that aired Sunday.
Obama said consensus had emerged between economists in both major U.S. political parties that expensive measures were necessary to avoid a deep recession.
The consensus is this that we have to do whatever it takes to get this economy move again, and we have to we're gonna have to spend money now to stimulate the economy, said CBS 60 minutes.
And consensus is that we shouldn't worry about the deficit next year or even the year after.
The short So, General Powell, shut up.
Stop worrying about it.
General Powell, you were told by Colin uh by Obama last November that a consensus of Republican and Democrat economists.
Don't worry about the deficits two years.
We have no other way out.
We'd avoid the recession.
We'd avoid the recession.
Yeah, avoid the recession.
We're only making it worse.
My but my point is General Powell was on notice long ago that this was going to happen.
Here's uh Conan as we go back to the phones.
Conan in Charlottesville, Virginia.
Nice to have you on the EIB network.
Hi.
15 handicapped two supporting dittoes, Rush.
Thank you very much, sir.
Well, I represent an uncounted invisible member of the unemployed class, the small business owner that can no longer afford to take a paycheck.
Well, that's the same thing as being unemployed.
What do you got to do?
How many employees do you have?
Well, I had about 15.
I'm down to 10, and my wife's gone from 10 to 5 in her business.
So you're paying 10 employees while you get zilch.
That's pretty much it.
And my work week's a lot longer than 33 hours.
Uh now people are asking an obvious question.
This is what they don't understand.
How can you pay yourself nothing and eat?
Living off of my savings.
Aha.
When uh why why don't you fire another worker and pay yourself?
Uh then I'd be working 90 hours a week.
So I'm I'm hoping for a turnaround.
I'm hoping Obama's war on corporate travel will end soon and my business will bounce back, and I hope people get a little more confidence in my life.
That's I'm glad you said that.
I have so many friends in the hospitality business.
And they are hurting Obama.
My golf trip next week features some of the premier golf courses.
No trouble getting on.
Nobody's going.
Everybody's scared to go.
The hospitality business is in deep trouble because Obama's got everybody afraid to act prosperous or to go out and have a good time.
I and while he's living it up with luaus and trips to France and trips to Camp David and so forth.
And I know, you know, the presidents get their own uh entertainment budget and food.
He's he's gotta have blown past it.
It's not that much.
He's gonna he's he's having he's gonna have to qualify all this as official state business to pay for all of it.
Luows and that kind of thing.
And the Iranians didn't even show up for the hot dogs, or they're not going to.
I guess they took my advice are gonna use Hebrew national hot dogs who keep the Iranians away.
Any rate, uh this is this is in the corporate travel business, and nobody's trapping traveling corporately.
The hospitality business is in deep trouble.
By design.
Remember it was Obama who said, Hey, these days, these days are traveling around.
Those days are over.
He gets these big business guys, I'm the only guy standing between you and the people in the pitchforks.
Remember that.
And he says, Look, days are over.
We can't just eat what we want to eat and keep our thermostats at 72 degrees and expect the rest of the world to accept that those days are over, except for him.
Interesting.
Dave and Tucson, you're next.
It's open line Friday.
Nice to have you here.
Hello.
Good morning, Rush.
How are you doing this morning?
Good, sir.
Thank you.
May your next round be your best.
Uh in all Russian.
It can't help but be.
Well, that's not true.
It can't help but be better.
That's a good way to put it.
Uh I've been thinking about a question to ask you for years, and there really isn't one, so I have to thank you.
Uh you keep saying that we always will remember the first time we ever listened to you.
What I remember is the first time my brain started moving so much faster than my mouth could keep up with, is when you said, Listen, folks, if you want to keep up with the economy, look at cardboard.
We use cardboard to make boxes, we use boxes to ship products.
And from that day, Rush, there is nothing you have said that I haven't been able to comprehend, and I want to thank you for that.
So you not only peg the day you first heard this program, you can peg to the day you first understood the program.
Absolutely.
Absolutely.
And there's nothing you say that gets by me.
It might take one second longer than normal, but it it it hits home.
Way to go, sir.
I'm glad that you feel that way, and you're and you're willing to admit how smart you are.
Oh, you know what?
That's not a problem, Rush.
And another thing I need to thank you for is being able to create opportunities rather than wait for them.
Uh one of my opportunities that I am creating is is to play a round of golf with you.
And that's it's it's uh it's slow but sure, but but I've found the way to create these opportunities that you speak of.
Well, yeah, I'm sure you remember the show where I said this is the one country where if you don't want to participate in recession, don't.
And I haven't.
Uh you can create your own job.
I haven't participated in this reception uh recession, and I haven't been affected by it uh one IOTO yet.
Yet.
Uh I'm waiting for it and I'm ready for it, but so far I haven't been affected.
Really, you haven't been affected in any way by it?
You know what, Rush?
And and it's uh Well it is.
Well that's a pretty broad statement.
I mean, you gotta know people who are affected by it.
Who either I certainly do, though, Rush, and I'm not proud of the fact that I'm not affected, but I'm not in the realm of having the assets in things in place that are normally affected by the people that do.
I'm still creating that.
Uh, and luckily enough, maybe I haven't gotten there yet in order for it to be created to be affected.
Okay.
Well, then I understand what you're talking about.
But we're we've all been affected by it one way or the other.
And I'm gonna tell you something else.
We all stand to be dramatically affected by what's coming if it happens.
Cap and trade, health care, even if you can pay for your own.
For example, eighty-five percent of medical discoveries and advances happen in this country in the private sector.
That's gonna get wiped out.
That's gonna affect us all.
I I have to think, and and by the way, welcome back.
Uh ladies and gentlemen, I I have to think that the Democrat Party, before all this is said and done, is going to destroy itself.
It is going that they're they're going to enact things here that the the the American people, most of whom are gonna be blindsided by, are just not gonna understand it, put up when they have no idea it's coming.
The question, the only question is, will this giant overreaching occur in time?
Or will it occur after Obama and these people are entrenched and there's nothing that can be done about it.
For example, this is from Reuters.
Los Angeles will eliminate the use of electricity made from coal by 2020.
They're gonna replace coal with power from cleaner renewable energy sources, said the mayor, Antonio Villarigosa.
What?
That's my point.
They can't.
There's no way.
This is not possible.
This is but they're gonna if if he even tries this.
Now let me let me keep reading the story here.
Consumers of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, the largest city owned utility in the U.S., 1.45 million electricity customers will see higher power bills in the fight against climate change, said the mayor.
He said this in his inaugural speech for his second four-year term as mayor on Wednesday.
California does not have any coal-fired power plants, a leading contributor to greenhouse gas pollution, but the it's a lie.
There is no...
But the uh Los Angeles Department of Water and Power now gets 40% of its electricity from coal plants outside the state.
LAWP will deliver 40% renewable power, with a remainder coming from natural gas, nuclear, and large hydroelectric Villa Ragosa said.
Nuclear.
Not as long as Tom Hayden's still alive.
Not as long as Jane Fonda's still alive.
Hell, don't even need those two.
Villa Guy R Villarigosa said the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power will meet its goal of getting twenty percent of its power from renewables by twenty ten.
Oh, it's twenty percent of its power now.
Oh there is nothing anywhere that supports that this can happen.
Folks, do you understand this?
The replacement for coal doesn't exist.
That's what cap and trade's all about.
Obama's telling people he's got dupes believing that this brilliant stroke of bold government action will lead to the creation of such technologies.
The market leads to such creation, not government.
I see you you people in Los Angeles, I must address you head on here.
You thought the gray Davis era of rolling blackouts were bad, the only way Villa Raigosa can pull this off is to black out certain sections of the city all the time, rotating which sections get blacked out.
Because there is no replacement for coal.
They're dead broke.
I know they're dead broke.
The whole state's dead broke, the cities are dead broke, and they're now going to invest in a in a in a in a technology that doesn't exist, uh, exist.
And when he says that uh electricity customers will see higher power bills, that's not even the half of it.
Try 90% increases if they even pull this off.
If they were to be able to pull it off 90% increases.
And that's you see, folks, that's your responsibility.
Your waste and your profligacy and your irresponsibility as citizens has led to the planet being in peril because of global warming because of the barbecue pits you have and the electricity you use and the and the cars that you drive and the airplanes that you fly in and you've got to pay.
We've all got to pay that's what the Obama administration's all about we've all got to pay for something.
The majority has to pay for its racism and bigotry.
The wealthy and powerful have to pay for their wealth and power and the fact that they've stolen it.
The only people that are not going to be paying well that's not everybody's going to be paying the only people won't be paying are the people on a government dole and that's going to be an increasing number Jim in South Bend, Indiana.
Welcome, sir.
It's Open Line Friday, and it's your turn.
Yeah, I got a question, something I couldn't figure out.
Why, before the cap-and-trade vote, all the news places said cap-and-trade, but after the vote, the very next morning, all the news sources started saying climate bill.
Why the change in language?
Well, probably because of a directive from the White House, I don't, you know, this is state-run media.
it's it's um climate bill is less explanatory of what actually is at stake here.
But that's a good catch on your part speaking of which, ladies and gentlemen, some more cap and trade extras people are now reading the bill and we have uh found other things in addition to what we've already imparted to you and that is that to sell your house some eco examiner's got to come in and mandate or approve that your house meets quota and if it doesn't you got to spend the money to make it eco friendly so it pass their test before you can sell it.
On page 193 of the cap and trade bill is a section it adds a section to the Social Security Act on an energy refund program.
Basically those making no more than 150% of the poverty line would get monthly cash payments from the government to offset the extra costs that are caused by the bill that's in the bill and this is direct deposit into these people's bank accounts cash deposits, transfer payments, redistribution.
If you make no more than 150% of the poverty line, what is the poverty line?
$14,000 or $20,000?
What is it right now?
Your family, $50,000, whatever.
So, you know, $20,000, you get direct deposits.
And by the way, there are going to be more and more of those people as Obama's economic policies result in more and more people being laid off.
The bill, the climate trade bill, the cap and trade bill, the climate bill global warming bill to save the planet bill would also tinker with the earned income tax credit by doubling the EITC for those with no dependents and include an inflation adjustment.
That's on page 1209.
And then there's an interesting section right after the EITC language Section 433 protection of Social Security and Medicare trust funds in the climate bill from the way it's been read here by Jamie Dupree is a blogger the um administrators of Medicare and Social Security would be able to tap into general revenues of the U.S. government if it's determined that the cap and trade bill has resulted in a reduction of revenues going into those two trust
funds.
Okay, poverty line uh family for twenty-two thousand fifty dollars for one person, a single family, single single per single person powder line is ten thousand.
That's a lot of people that are going to be having direct deposits.
So the people that run Medicare and Medicaid are going to be able to rob the general fund as a result of the cap and trade bill.
If the costs of cap and trade deplete trust funds, the trust funds are empty anyway.
It's just it's another piece of legislation that that has very little to do with what its title or claim is.
Here's uh Jerry in Cookville, Tennessee.
Hi, Jerry, thank you for calling.
You're on open line Friday, you're next.
Hi, Rush.
Uh first off, I'd just like to say to you and all your staff, uh very happy Independence Day uh at a 233 years, uh, this might be the last one as we know it to be a real independence day.
And um I I call to ask you what kind of uh what kind of golf clubs do you use?
I mean, are they ping?
Hirahama Woods or No, my my bag is full of different kinds.
I use I have a Cleveland launcher driver that's about it's it's uh eight and a half degrees loft.
It's about four, three or four years old, and nothing I've tried since is as good.
I just I love the damn thing.
My irons, four iron through uh uh wedge or tailor-made R7s, and I have a couple of Vokey 54 and 60 degree wedges.
Uh utility clubs three and four iron are tailor-made.
What are you laughing at there, Don?
Golf games golf game does well, yes, it's open line Friday, and and uh the I use a Scotty Cameron custom made for me putter.
What have you ever used a foot wedge?
Those are pretty handy sometimes when you're in tough shots and if when nobody's looking well absolutely that's the club that's not in your back.
Yeah.
But um if if I could just change the subject uh real quickly, um our our president, then he was Senator uh Obama, he kept saying that he wanted to change the fundamental values of America.
And those are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
So anybody should not be um surprised by what he's doing.
It's not just Obama.
You know, you raise a good point.
The American left, Obama makes it plain.
He looks at the Constitution as constraining him.
He said the other day, um, well, Constitution prevents us from taking bold action real fast.
If if he could get rid of it to where he could wave his magic wand or do things by executive fiat, he would do them.
Uh the but the whole left looks at the Declaration of Independence.
You you have to the the left in this country for the longest time despises the declaration.
This whole notion that we are all endowed by our creator, they hate that.
They don't believe in God.
With certain inalienable rights.
See, when you say that we're all endowed with certain inalienable rights, that's final.
There is no more.
You can't add to it certain inalienable rights is final.
Among these are life, liberty, pursuit of happiness.
Those are final.
You can't build on them.
You can't, all you can do is take away the left doesn't like any of this.
And they certainly don't like the U.S. Constitution.
And it's been this way for a long time.
You know, the the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence.
There's a I have a great piece on it here.
Uh from the Heritage Foundation has a good one, but there's also one here from the American thinker that I'll I'll have to find.
It's it's uh brilliantly put together about how the founding fathers who wrote the Declaration of Independence didn't put it up to vote, they didn't poll it, they didn't do anything that politicians today do.
Makes the point that if the declaration had been put up for a vote in the day, colonial times, it might have failed.
Because you had the same mix of people back then, scared to death of the king, scared to death of rumpling any feathers.
No, no, no, I don't want to go on my own.
I don't want to fly alone, no, no.
They didn't do that.
They they knew that they had well, it was a miracle.
What they the the whole thing in Philadelphia and the uh the declaration in the later the Constitution, it was a miracle.
And uh it it's there's no more perfect form of government that's been devised.
I know Churchill's line is surviving regardless, but nevertheless you can't go beyond certain inalienable rights endowed by our creator.
That final life, liberty, pursuit of happiness.
These are final concepts.
They're not they're not things that have to just starting points that you build on.
So what they are are things that have to be torn down and broken apart.
And uh there have been people trying to do this since the days of ratification.
It just so happens that in our lifetimes, those forces have become powerful enough to get elected now.
And that's the battle that we face.
And the battle really is over.
The founding of this country and what kind of country it's gonna be.
And when Obama talks about remaking America, the caller here is exactly right.
Remaking America means destroying these traditions, institutions that have defined America and its greatness since the founding.
Back after.
Here's something for you people of Los Angeles, Southern California, after listening to the uh inaugural address of the mayor of Villagarosa, Villa Rigosa, Villa Yeah, Villa Red Ghost.
Uh June was especially gloomy in Southern California.
Temperatures in Los Angeles below normal every day of the month.
But we've got to get rid of coal-fired nuclear plant for global warming.
The uh National Weather Service says the region has gone through a fairly noteworthy stretch of cool weather.
June's average daily high in downtown Los Angeles, 74.5 degrees, five degrees below normal.
At the airport, at Los Angeles International, LAX, the highest temperature for the month was 71 degrees.
The lowest high temperature for a June since records began being kept in 1944.
The airport's average high temperature last month was 69.3 degrees, the lowest since June of 1982.
And similar stories can be told about the Northeast and the Upper Midwest.
I mean, we're into July, and some parts of this country haven't seen any evidence of summer yet, other than the leaves are on the trees.
David in Chicago, this is one place.
Nice to have you on the program, sir.
Hi.
Hello, Rush.
It's a pleasure.
Uh I'm a physician and a geriatrician, and I wanted to agree with you that uh President Obama's policies will eliminate competition from the health care marketplace and therefore eliminate motivation to innovate, not just in technology, but in healthcare systems and wise use of resources.
And let me give you an example.
Most of my patients have Medicare Advantage, which is a program that Obama has railed on and uh wants to eliminate.
This works like an HMO.
So my patients' Medicare benefits are reassigned to an insurance company which contracts with me.
And if I can manage their health care within a certain amount, uh then I will actually do well.
In other words, if I if I meet certain goals, including patient satisfaction, I get a little bonus at the end of the year because I've managed their health care within that amount of money.
And President Obama has called this program wasteful spending, and that we're overpaying insurance companies.
See, this is exactly what I mean.
Here is a program relying on competition to keep costs down, which means it works.
You have an incentive to keep your cost down to keep your patients happy.
You get a bonus.
Who paid you Medicare, Medicaid Pluses who pays you?
Medicare pays the insurance company, which then contracts with me to manage their care well.
Wouldn't it be wouldn't you love it though if your patients could pay you?
Well, those days are gone, I'm afraid.
I refuse to believe this.
See, that's I know what you're saying.
I'm not arguing with you.
I'm saying a philosophical sense.
Those days are gone as exactly why those days are we're headed that way.
Those days are gone, but the patients pay.
Those days are gone.
No, they're not gone.
No reason to give up on them being gone.
Anyway, this guy, this doctor.
Obama's targeting his plan to shut it down.
He says it's wasteful.
It works.
It proves you don't need Obama's plan.
That's why.
This doctor's arrangement here is under assault by the pre.
You know, I know this is hard to hear that we have elected a president who wants to do that.
I don't know any other way to say it, folks.
It is true.
Okay, we uh are rapidly uh uh racing through the fastest three hours in media, already the end of hour two.
Big finale hour is mere moments away.
See you then.
▲
Export Selection