All Episodes
Previous Next
April 10, 2009 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:45
April 10, 2009, Friday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I'm not kidding.
This little 13-year-old girl that called us in Beverly Hills.
In her school, pictures of Obama everywhere, hero worship of Obama.
She said it scares her to see this kind of worship of a president.
I guarantee you, if this little girl had called here a couple years ago and said that pictures of George W. Bush in her school scare her.
She'd be on the situation room on CNN by five o'clock this afternoon.
It's Friday.
Let's go, folks.
We've got it live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida.
It's open line Friday.
We have a big exciting hour to go, folks.
Great to have you with us.
Telephone number 800.
282-2882 and the email address L Rushball at EIB net.com.
This is very comforting.
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said yesterday, she did not see Iran's latest statements about its nuclear program as a rebuff to U.S. overtures to engage Tehran.
She also voiced skepticism about Iran's new claims that it had made major progress in its nuclear program and tested more advanced equipment centrifuges for enriching uranium.
And then she said, Quote, we don't know what to believe about the Iranian program.
We've heard many different assessments and claims over a number of years.
You know, they're out there, they're thinking so hard on this, they're thinking so hard on the Somali merchant organizers, the marine organizers.
They're thinking so hard about Iran, they're thinking so hard about North Korea, they do not know.
They have no idea.
We don't know what to believe.
How about believing Achmadinizad?
That's the path of least resistance, Mrs. Clinton.
Believe what the lunatic says.
If he's lying, it's a bonus.
If he's not, and we're not prepared for it, we're cooked.
This is strange piece.
But nevertheless, this piece, if it gets wide distribution, will set feminism back fifty years.
It's a story from a website called Bitterlawyer.com.
Bitterlawyer.com.
Law professors won't tell their female students this, but one method some women use to get ahead in the corporate world has nothing to do with grades or professionalism or hard work, just fake boobs.
In a recent bitter lawyer poll, 58% of those asked said that boob implants could only help a woman's career.
The remainder of respondents were split on the matter.
Just over 23% of those polled paid said that such cosmetic changes were irrelevant.
In this cramped job market, women boosting their looks to compete is now a trend.
Looks play a role.
According to the American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, there were about 355,000 breast augmentations performed in the U.S. last year.
A significant percentage of these patients were in fact female lawyers.
Or at least that's what the plastic surgeons who consulted told us.
While no doctor would identify their patients by name, they all confirmed a decent percentage of their clients were lawyers.
Professor Laura Trippett.
Triplett, I'm sorry, who teaches courses on the social implications of appearance at California State University Fullerton.
Wait a second now.
This is a university, California State University, and they have an expert, a professor, who teaches courses on the social implications of appearance.
That is a course for which you can get credit.
Anyway, Laura Triplett, the professor here says an attorney with implants will see a reaction from their employers, and that reaction is likely to be positive, though not necessarily overt.
Women who have male employers are going to experience far more positive impact from having breast implants in comparison to women who have female employers.
because it all comes down to improved self-esteem according to plastic surgeon Dr. Sharon Gies Who says that professional women tend to go up only by a single cup size compared to non-professional women who can be counted on to enhance two sizes or more.
The reason she says is that one size is enough for most women to achieve an improved sense of self, and that's often what drives their workplace success.
In other words, if she feels sexy, she'll be more confident in the bedroom and at work, and success will likely follow.
Can I redirect you to Feminist Truth number 24, undeniable truth of life number 24, written by me in the mid-80s?
Feminism was established so as to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream of society.
It's proved practically every day in our modern culture.
Essentially, what this story is a five-page story at bitterlawyer.com.
If you're a woman you want to be a successful attorney, you better go get a boob job before you finish school.
Because in this tight job market, it might be the ticket to a job at a law firm.
It'll enhance your self-esteem, uh confidence in and out of the bedroom in the boardroom.
Newspapers, ladies and gentlemen, print endless phony stories every day.
Do we agree?
It happens every day.
On the front page, in the B section, in the C section, wherever you go in the newspaper, you can find endless phony stories.
There is a controversy over such a story on the front page of today's Los Angeles Times.
The Los Angeles Times has sold an ad on the front page of the paper.
The ad is for a new NBC television series called Southland.
And I think it's about cops.
But regardless, the ad is made to look exactly like a news story.
It is a huge news story with a photo below the fold.
On the front page of the Los Angeles Times.
NBC paid for it.
As part of the next phase in its extensive marketing campaign for this drama, NBC has bought a traditional strip advertisement that'll run across the bottom of the Times page one and will feature art from the show.
It'll be adjacent to another paid unit, an advertorial type feature story documenting the first day on the job of a fictional LA police department rookie cop.
So a fake news story a fake an advertisement made to look like a news story runs on the front page of the LA Times.
I would dare say that this fake news story, which is an ad is probably more truthful in its content than a lot of the journalism that appears in the LA Times.
That's just me.
But of course, the holier than now journalists of the LA Times are outraged.
The NBC ad may have provided some quick cash, but it has caused incalculable damage to this institution.
This is a poster from the LA Times.
This action violates a 128-year pact with our readers that the front page is reserved for the most meaningful stories of the day.
Placing a fake news article in A1 makes a mockery of our integrity and our journalistic standards.
Your newspaper is losing business.
Your newspaper's losing advertisers, readers, and your newspaper is on the block.
Those of you that work there, and everybody's talking, we need a new model for newspapers.
The standard model, what with the internet and everything else doesn't work.
So here, okay, sell an ad on the front page and make it look like a news story.
But Mithra Lumbaugh that it's compromising the thicker principle of journalism, which is devoted to who, what, when there, how in the truth.
Well, if you can find that elsewhere in the paper, I can understand the beef.
But the simple fact of the matter is every time the LA Times or any newspaper runs one of their polls, it's a phony news story.
Smackdowns of conservatives, phony news, biased reporting by liberals is phony news.
Reports on global warming, totally phony.
Reports on the economy during the Bush years were totally phony.
Iraq stories were totally phony.
Stimulus stories are totally phony.
Adulation stories on Barack Obama totally phony.
So now you've got a front page advertisement that's made to look like a story, and it's probably pure pretty accurate about what the TV show's about.
There's probably more accuracy in the fake story than there is in your average LA Times front page story.
Or any other newspaper.
The obituaries are probably the most dependable, honest things in newspapers.
But even there, the jury is still out.
Classified ads, I'd say second.
Crossword puzzle, you can pretty much count on that.
The sports pages used to be fairly honest.
Now the Libs have totally taken over the sports pages.
And uh I it's you know, that's that's deteriorating into a you know a touchy feely section with political overtones of most newspapers as well, brief time out here, folks.
It's open line Friday.
Uh your phone calls are coming up next, right after this.
Open line Friday, Ed in Worcester, Massachusetts.
Nice to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Hi, Hawaii.
I'm Megan Diddles, Rush.
You bet.
Uh my question is concerning this is about a month ago.
We gave the Palestines about 900 million dollars to rebuild their country.
And I was just curious, I I wanted an explanation.
Where did that 900 million come from?
Who pays it back, and how do the Israelis feel about us supporting Palestine?
Well, in the first place, we didn't give the money to the Palestinians, we gave it to Hamas.
Okay.
When you give money to the Palestinians, I mean the Palestinians, I mean, who leads them, who runs them who organize them, terrorist groups do.
Uh, and in this case it was Hamas.
We gave ostensibly the announced reason was uh we had to help the uh Palestinians rebuild the Gaza Strip after the evil, mean-spirited Israelis sent rockets and mortar fire into it.
Nobody filled in the blanks that the Israelis were just responding to an endless series of rocket attacks from Hamas for for months and months and months.
The reason we did this is speculative.
But it was the Obama administration that did it.
The Obama administration uh believes uh in a Palestinian state, a two-state solution over there, and and they're very, very they publicly have said they're very concerned about the new Israeli leadership under the uh head of uh uh Benjamin Netanyahu.
So the Obama administration is is basically this this is a one of the largest departures uh in American history in that region in my lifetime.
It's being done on purpose.
You ask what do the Israelis think of I don't know uh the the You would think they would be liberalism's everywhere, man.
I I don't I don't know.
I mean if if it depends on where you can Tel Aviv, they're probably all for it.
In Jerusalem, they're Prague building bomb shelters.
You know, it just it just it just it just depends on on who you ask.
Now, did did we borrow this money to give to them?
No, we probably printed it.
I mean, we're we're where we don't have any money, where are we getting the money for General Motors?
Where are we getting the money for the banks?
Where are we gonna we're printing it?
Exactly.
I mean, so we shouldn't have to be able to do it.
And they say we can't come up with two million dollars for the Somali pirates.
Hell, we've had two million dollars laying over at the FDIC somewhere, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac.
If they took one of our boats and bumped into that little boat out in the ocean and knocked them into the water, they're probably gonna drop their guns and uh won't be able to hurt you.
I read the other day that uh uh naval and maritime experts have said that it would take sixty-one ships to surround and patrol the area where the uh the marine organizers from Somalia are working.
And you know, you would think, okay, if you really want to stop this, just blow them out of the water.
Just for just a week, everyone you find blow them out of the water.
You can't do that, Mr. Lumbaugh, That's a violation of civil rights, human rights, liberal rights, the Constitution, and the World Court.
Well, yeah, I know.
But more importantly, the these guys it was said on CNN last they have a good business model.
Of course, GM sucks.
Citibank sucks.
Big oil sucks.
The pirates have a good business model.
So they're on these little beat-up trawlers that look like fishing ships.
And until they make a move, you have no idea whether they're pirates or fishermen.
So you just can't start indiscriminately blowing them out of the water.
Yes, you could.
All you have to do is drop some leaflets or go on television, go on Al Jazeera or something, and say starting Monday morning at eight, we're gonna blow out any ship we see in this area.
If you're not a pirate and just a fisherman, don't go to sea that day.
Warn them.
Mr. Limboy, you can't be theoreth about this.
You can't possibly be theory at the murder of innocent people.
I'm presenting an option.
The administration don't know what to do.
They don't know what to do about anything.
There are ways this has been dealt with in the past.
And conflict resolution 101 and trying to find moderate pirate leaders to bargain with and negotiate with.
It's not the these people are terrorists.
No, they're not, Mr. Lombaugh.
These are bankers, these are businessmen, these are pirates.
No.
They're uh they're terrorists.
By the way, we we've we've talked with the automobile industry and the bailouts and so forth, and you know, all of us want the domestic auto business to come back, and uh a lot of us.
I'll I'll just now I won't speak for you.
I just feel sorry as hell they're in this situation where they have a bunch of Nimrods running their business, not knowing the slightest thing.
I had a story in the stack, I didn't get to it yesterday with the Chevy Vault.
They're starting to dump on the Chevy Vault now.
It's it may be too expensive.
They may they may not they may not ever get it done.
The government not really crazy about it.
Gee whiz, this is what GM did to try to get on everybody's good side.
So, you know, GM, Cadillac, all their brands, they're trying to revive.
They're trying to get started and kickstart a rally.
And they're trying to reinvent the ownership experience when you buy a car from them.
And they've come up with something called the total confidence plan.
It starts with a fully backed five-year, one hundred thousand mile power train limited warranty, whichever comes first.
And then, of course, OnStar, which uh standard on every Cadillac model, that's safety and security for a full year.
OnStar is incredible, by the way.
But this is where it gets interesting.
If you buy a new Cadillac, they will help protect its retail value at trade-in time.
And if you lose your job, like if you're one of the 7,000 laid off in New York.
Cadillac will make your payments up to $500 a month for up to nine months.
So go to Cadillac Confidence.com.
All details and limitations are there.
You have to, there's some restrictions.
You have to take delivery of your new car by April 30th.
Uh you can see participating dealer for details, but this is one of the things they're trying, making your payments up to $500 a month for nine months in this economy, trying to kick start the sale of automobiles.
Just get the process moving of cars hitting the market.
Here is uh Mark in Houston.
Glad you called, sir.
You're next on the EIB network.
Hello.
Megadetto's from the current president and CEO of my own minority.
Rush, I'd just like to say that socialism is big business.
It's bigger than big oil.
It's bigger than big tomato and big union.
It's not about equality for individuals or uh the Kumbaya liberals.
It's really some very, very powerful people that I believe are investing billions of dollars into anti-capitalist protests into funding elections.
Explain to people how socialism is big business.
Because somebody is going to end up with this pile of money, and I would have to follow the money and say that it's The people that are investing the big billions of dollars into this uh into this movement so they can benefit from it.
Not to help out the little guy.
That's the that's the facade.
Well, of course, and it works.
It works.
The little guy always thinks that he's owed something.
But here's uh uh uh Mark in Houston here has a point.
You know, the old adage, follow the money if you want the answer to anything.
Socialism, big business.
Take a look at the trillions of dollars the government is handing to certain people, and certain businesses.
They don't even have to earn it.
They've just decided they're gonna give it away.
Some of it might be called loans.
Uh, regardless.
Maybe it's big business, but it's hideous.
Socialism does not provide for the general welfare, and it does not create entrepreneurial activity, freedom, liberty, or happiness.
I read last night that uh staff members for President Obama.
Since uh Easter is Sunday, staff members are visiting various churches in Washington trying to find one for President Obama and Michelle My Bell.
Which it's fine.
Then I read something, and I maybe, maybe I'm just in a depressed mood today, but this is everything's making me sad, but New York layoff story makes me sad it's happening to people and all these other firings and layoffs.
And then I read something in this story that made me sad.
Story said that the aides scouring the church have been to four churches.
One mixed, one black and two white churches.
And the story said the Obamas may feel pressure to go to a black pressure so as not a church so as not to anger the black community.
And it made me sad.
Made me sad.
Why should that matter?
Pick a church is gonna make somebody mad.
Might anger the what are they gonna do?
I thought you picked a church for other reasons.
I don't know.
It just it just it just we haven't made any advances.
I mean, if that's it's that's the basis on which a church is gonna be chosen for the president of the United States.
You may as well call a preacher in and do the service in the East Room like everything else you do at the White and televise it.
And then send them out for re little work groups to report on the sermon and come back and have a little meeting here on on what the work groups think of the sermon.
Here is Bob Schrom, Democrat consultant and so forth.
He was on uh Andrea Mitchell's NBC News in Washington show yesterday on MSNBC.
She said, I wanted to ask you about a report in the New York Times today.
The president's gonna take on immigration reform, which of course became impossible for George Bush with all of his good intentions.
He was unable to accomplish it, something that John McCain has been pressuring to have some action on.
Is this really going to become a priority on top of everything else that he's trying to do?
Yes, I think they're gonna move on immigration.
I hope the Republicans fulminate against it because they'll get to the point where they won't get a single Hispanic vote.
Go ahead and make my decade turn Texas into a democratic state.
I don't know about Texas.
It happened in California, it can happen in Texas.
So Bob Schrum reveals what all of this is all about.
What we've always known about amnesty is designed to extend, expand the Democrat Party and kill the Republican Party.
And of course, the Republican Party's way of dealing with it is self-defeating.
To pander and so forth and act like they have the same attitude about it that Democrats do.
Well, what would work, Mr. Limbaugh?
Conservatism.
You approach people as people, not as member of groups, members of groups.
You approach them as people.
You tell them they live in the greatest country in the world, United States of America, that you love them.
You want the best for them, but it's up to them.
And this country provides more opportunity for people willing to go out and strive for it, work for it, and what our gonna do, what our party's gonna do is get out of your way.
They're gonna get out of your way, and we're gonna let you.
Now, if you're illegal, we're not gonna violate our laws.
But The Democrat Party way is to destroy the U.S. culture in order to get votes for power.
Why would the Republican Party want to go along with that?
But they do, because it's the path of least resistance, the path of least criticism, other than from their own voters.
Terry in uh in Dublin, Ohio.
I'm glad you waited.
You're next on the EIB network.
Hello.
Uh, I feel like I hit the lottery.
I've been trying for two weeks to get through.
Thank you, sir, very much.
And no payoff here, but America, you have to be you have to persevere.
You have to be patient.
Just because your webpage doesn't load as fast as you want it, the economy isn't going to be as fast as a web page.
Um what really irks me is with corporate America, people saying, uh can I get my job back?
Are you going to be able to get my job back from something that's been outsourced and the corporations are going all over out of the country?
Why don't these people invest in America, invest in corporate America, become stockholders?
The CEOs and the boards of directors pay lip service to their shareholders.
Invest in America and invest in yourself by investing in corporate America.
Wouldn't that help?
It might, no question about it.
Uh but the the whole thing about outsourcing.
Even President Obama slipped up.
And I love this because a teleprompter, that teleprompter sometimes sneaks things in there that are not in Obama's best interest to say, but the teleprompter nevertheless makes him say them.
And Obama got a he got a call during his his virtual town meeting about outsourcing jobs.
He said, Look, those jobs aren't coming back.
There's a reason they aren't coming back.
They're outsourced for a reason, an economic reason.
And they're not coming back.
And if you're sitting out waiting for a job that's now being done by a slum dog in India, and you're waiting for that job to be canceled for the slum dog to be thrown out of work, and you to get the job ain't gonna happen.
It's not the way economics works.
Even Obama's teleprompter got him to admit that.
Now, as for slow loading web pages, I haven't had that problem and I don't know how long.
Uh I use Safari beta four with a T3.
I mean, it's just it's just there.
If your if your web page is loading slow and it bothers you that much, go get a T3.
Or band a bunch of cable modems together or uh or what have you.
No reason to never sit up there and tolerate a slow loading web page.
Who's next?
Alyssa, a fifteen-year-old from holding holding Ford Minnesota.
Is that right?
Nice to have you on the program.
Hi, Rush.
Thanks.
Um, I was telling gonna tell you about a um conference about cab and trade that I went to in St. Cloud State, Minnesota.
Wait a minute.
What wait a minute here, uh Alyssa.
You're 15.
How did you end up going to a cap and trade seminar?
Um my dad got a couple of emails about it from Michelle Bachman, and I really wanted to learn more about it.
Oh, okay.
So it was m Michelle Bachman is is your is your congresswoman.
Yeah.
And so she did a town meeting seminar on cap and trade.
Oh, oh, okay.
So your dad got the he wanted nobody took you.
Um he took me and one of his friends.
All right.
So do you know did you know what cap and trade was before the seminar?
Um a little bit.
Do you know more about it now?
Yeah.
And I was gonna tell you about the liberals that were there.
Oh, good.
I'd love to I love hearing about liberals at seminars.
They were actually really rude there, and they had to be talked to by security a couple of times.
And you mean they were disrupting uh Congresswoman Bachman?
And Chris Horner.
Chris Horner was the one that was talking about it.
Okay, so they the liberals.
These are probably uh community organizers like Acorn, the same kind of people that are the pirates.
Yeah.
And um they were screaming questions, and they were we got these cards that we had to fill out questions on, and they instead of that they were screaming them out, and then they asked about green jobs, and he asked them to name a couple of them, and they just shut up after that.
Yeah, they're really there's no a green job is a myth.
What is a green job?
Didn't they have an answer for it?
No.
What is a green job?
How much you make doing a green job?
There is no such thing.
A landscaper's a green job, you work around things that are green.
Grass, weeds, flowers, plants, that sort of thing.
Yeah.
Well, I'm glad that you got to see this.
Was this the first time that you had seen in person this kind of rude behavior from liberals?
Yeah.
How'd it make you feel?
I was actually really mad at them.
Were you scared at all?
Not really.
You were just mad.
Yeah.
Did they try to shut down the seminar?
Did they succeed in doing that?
No.
How many of them were there?
Um I think there were about two thousand people there, and there were probably maybe twenty of them.
Twenty.
Twenty agitators, twenty community organizers showed up to try to disrupt things, but they failed, essentially.
Mm-hmm.
Well, I'm glad now you you knew that this was liberal behavior before you went there, you just had never seen it in person.
Yeah.
Seeing it in person has a much more powerful impact than just watching it on television.
Is watching television, you're not really there, and it you see it on TV so much that it didn't have any impact, but when you're there, like you were, profound impact.
Well, that that is pretty much standard operating behavior for American Well, it is, Snerdly.
Now you people think I'm going to be misleading this young girl, but I'm not.
This is they're they're they're constantly mad, they're constantly angry.
They don't want to debate whatever's being debated.
They want to shut down any discussion of a position that's not theirs because they're afraid that the two thousand people there were going to be persuaded uh to agree with a concept that they don't agree with.
So rather than debate it, they wanted to shut it down.
This is how they operate.
It's uh it's intimidation.
These people were probably paid too.
Most of them looked like they were college students.
Yeah.
I'm sure they're just uh, you know, you know, saving up money for the next party kegger, whatever.
Um Well, good.
I'm I'm glad I'm glad you said how did it end up?
I mean, when you w would the seminar end up being okay and you learned more about it than you knew the before you went in?
Yeah, I learned a lot actually.
What could is there one thing that stood out that you learned?
Um that actually like there's the global cooling that like they talked about like couple years back, like when my dad was in school, that like and there was global warming that was way worse before like the earth like fluctuates in temperature.
Yeah.
You know, here's the here that's exactly by the way, your dad was in school more than two years ago.
I hope.
Yeah.
Um because he's you're talking about the covers of Newsweek and Time Magazine back in 1979.
That um they were talking about the coming ice age back then.
But here I want to give you, Alyssa, a closing thought that will help you to understand liberals even more.
Let's take the global warming debate.
And this has to do with with what I call the vanity and the total lack of humility that these people have.
The earth is billions of years old.
The earth, as you learned, has gone through cycles of heat and cooling, warmth and freezing that are beyond the ability of any earthly creature, human or otherwise, to influence.
We can influence our environment.
We have air conditioning and heat, but we can't change the climate.
We never have been able to.
But for some reason, throughout all these billions of years, the last twenty or thirty, which are so microscopic, a grain of sand does not represent the size of the last thirty years in just a hundred years.
I mean, th we we are so infinitesimal a part of this planet.
Yet the last thirty years, all of these people, Alyssa say that everything that is now is normal.
The level of ice, the temperatures, average temperatures around the world, the amount of rainfall, cloud cover, everything now is what is normal.
And any variation is a deaster.
Any variation or trend toward a variation is a disaster.
Now, what kind of arrogance does it require for a living human being to think that in the full breadth and scope of world history that their little irrelevant period of time on it is the way it's always been, or is even optimum and the best.
The world is constantly moving in shape.
Your dad someday is going to take you to the Grand Canyon.
Your dad someday is going to take you to Arizona, and you're going to see big mountains, and you're going to learn.
You're going to see lines and scales all up and down the sides of the canyons and scales, and you're going to be told that what you're looking at used to be thousands of feet underwater.
And what you're looking at are sediment lines.
And you look up and it's thousands of feet in the air, hundreds of feet in the air.
What is underwater?
And then you're going to ask yourself, how in the world could I have seen to it that all these rocks that were underwater somehow became mountains on the surface?
You couldn't have done it.
It's just happened.
And that's how the climate operates.
You're um well, you got a you got a great head start thanks to your dad taking you to this thing.
It's great that he did.
Uh quick time.
Oh, uh uh Alyssa, thanks for the call.
I appreciate it.
I keep getting emails.
I people would listen closer.
Yes.
Uh Carbonite is available for Macintosh.
Carbonite is the off-site online backup system.
It is fabulous.
It's great insurance.
Start the initial backup.
May take a week or two, depending on how big your hard drive that you're backing up is.
But it happens in the background.
You don't see it.
It never gets in the way, doesn't interrupt anything, and then after the initial backup is done, it incrementally banks up backs up whatever changes.
Every time you're logged onto the internet, every time you're connected, it's backing up.
It only costs five bucks a month.
If you log on to Carbonite.com, use offer code Rush, you save even more money.
Less than five bucks a month, and you'll be glad you did this because at some point your hard drive is going to get damaged or ruined, and you're putting more and more important things on it, even from experts to novices, this happens.
Carbonite.com can make sure that you lose nothing of importance.
Man, these youngsters are fired up out there.
It's spring break.
We got another one, 14 years old, Josh in Los Angeles.
Josh, I have about a minute and a half, but I wanted to get you on.
Hi, Rush.
Hi.
Hi.
Um I called to talk to you.
I l I actually live cl close to Beverly Hills where that girl lives who called earlier.
Yeah.
And I wanted to talk about how in the schools they've been they've they've really been sensationalizing President Obama, but not educating the kids about why the about why.
And I I remember uh we they had the inauguration dispersed throughout the entire school.
And I asked one of my teachers, you know, I said, you know, I uh did they do the same thing for George Bush?
And they kind of gave me this, oh no, but you know, this is a really really historic one.
And I kind of responded by saying, well, you know, any of the forty-four men who've been elected president is pretty historic, and so why they wouldn't put it on for George Bush, and and I just keep getting this, well, well, well, well, whatever.
And you're a real troublemaker, Josh.
I love you.
And I think it's I think I think it's wrong that they're not because so many kids at my school, I've seen too many.
Obama t-shirts, Obama this, Obama that.
On Facebook, everyone puts Obama, Obama this, Obama that.
This is part of the plan.
Uh you know, this is we saw evidence of this during the campaign when the little kids were videos of little school kids sending or singing songs about uh about about President Obama.
Josh, have a great Easter and a great spring break.
And uh thanks for calling in.
These see folks, they're not all being brainwashed out there.
Fabulous news.
Back after this.
Even though Newsweek magazine says we are not a Christian nation anymore, I nevertheless want to wish everybody a happy Easter or a happy Passover, whichever's the case for you, or happy piracy.
▲
Export Selection