All Episodes
Previous Next
April 7, 2009 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:38
April 7, 2009, Tuesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
No, Mr. Snerdley, I'm deadly serious.
This wheelchair car was not contrary to what everybody says, the wheelchair car is not designed to help the disabled.
It was designed to handicap the able-bodied.
What happens if one of these things breaks down?
The new tow truck will be a golf cart.
Sheesh.
All right, we're back.
Rush Limbaugh on the cutting edge of societal evolution.
Here's the phone number if you want to be on the program, 800-282-2882, the email address, L Rushbaugh at EIB net.com.
Drive by media suppressing this news.
Mark Stein, I'm told talked about it yesterday after the Pew Research survey that shows that the partisan gap in the Obama job approval is the widest in the modern era.
For all of his hopes about bipartisanship.
Barack Obama has the most polarized early job approval ratings of any president in the past four decades.
The 61 point partisan gap in opinions about Obama's job performance is the result of a combination of high Democrat ratings, 88% job approval among Democrats, and a relatively low approval ratings among Republicans.
27%, which I'm surprised Republican Republican approval rating is that high, but still that's a huge gap.
By comparison, there was a somewhat smaller 51-point partisan gap with George W. Bush in April of 2001, a few months into uh into his first term, same thing with the with Clinton, substantially smaller than what Obama faces.
The growing partisan divide in presidential approval ratings is part of a long-term trend.
Going back in time, partisanship was far less evident in the early job approval ratings for both Jimmy Carter and Richard Nixon.
In fact, a majority of Republicans, 56% approved of Carter's job performance in late March of 77, and a majority of Democrats 55% approved of Nixon's performance at a comparable point in his first term.
Now, what is this?
What is it tell us?
Well, it tells us the country is polarized.
I have said it.
We are a bipolar nation.
The media, however, is not polarized.
The media is pr this is important.
The media is presenting a story of a unified nation, enthralled and in near idolatry of Barack Obama and the world too.
When in fact it's not the case.
Now Barack Obama ran as the great unifier.
Obama ran as the guy who was going to end all of this.
Obama ran as the guy who was going to bring a new politics to Washington.
A lot of politicians do, and it's all BS, but people with uh with Obama believed it.
Now, what strikes me interesting about this beyond what's obvious is that we have, you know, on the Republican or the conservative side of the aisle, we have our own Internecine wars going on conservatives for who's a real conservative and what should the conservative movement be, and what should the Republican Party be going forward?
We have all of these tea parties out.
These things are massive.
They're being totally ignored by the drive-by media.
The uh tax day, April 15th, is going to see huge tea parties in major cities across the country.
Some of the local communities are trying to tear them down because they claim it's going to be a dangerous situation with so many people and so forth.
They're going to be big.
It is obvious.
You know, there were how many people voted against Obama?
Was it 55, 56 million people voted against him?
And I don't think anything has changed to make those 55 or 56 million that you know I made a mistake.
This is a great guy.
I mean, I really like what he's doing to our economy.
I really like what he's doing to our country.
I really like how he's over there in Europe apologizing for us.
Every stop he makes.
I really I really I don't think that's happened.
I think it's just the exact opposite.
Yet the quote unquote intelligentsia on our side, the elites of the conservative movement, told us that Obama's got a great temperament.
He's very smart.
Uh he reads books, uh, writes books, reads books.
He's really, really, really intellectual guy.
Uh and he's he's the kind of candidate the Republicans need to put forward themselves.
Somebody who understands that the American people want an ever growing government, but they want it growing and used in a smarter way.
Blah, blah.
Well, I look at this Pew Research data as a profound rebuke of people on our side who claim the future of the Republican Party resides in abandoning conservatism.
And make no mistake, it's what they're saying.
Conservatism is what it is.
Conservatism does not get modified.
There aren't three stools to it.
We're told that there are.
We're told, well, we got the social conservatives.
And we've got the fiscal conservatives.
And we have the uh libertarian conservatives.
Well, you know, a social conservative is not really a conservative.
Social conservative wants to say he or she is conservative, but they're really not.
Conservatism is what it is.
There's nothing wrong with it.
It doesn't need to be moderated or modified.
It is what it is.
Now, if conservatism needs to be modified, if conservatism needs to be upgraded, updated, if you will, to the current issues of the day.
So I believe conservative principles apply no matter what the issues are.
But regardless, it doesn't seem to me that this polarized partisan gap in Obama's approval rating is any indication that the people that want to quote unquote reform conservatism have any idea what they're talking about.
Because if they were right, this partisan gap wouldn't exist.
Look, we've got a guy using big government.
We got a guy who make the world think that he's smart, smarter than anybody else, that the country's changing.
He's out there apologizing for America's excesses, America's uh bullying of the past generations and so forth.
This is this is this is precisely the kind of candidate, erudite, well-spoken and so forth, use of big government, uh, that the conservative intelligence on our side has said is the future of the Republican Party.
And yet 27 was a 73% of Republicans reject that notion.
So it seemed to me that the Republican Party's out of touch with itself.
The Republican Party is out of touch with its voters.
The conservative element of the Republican Party at the leadership level is likewise.
What these Tea Parties represent all over the world is the fact that there is no leadership, either at the top of the conservative political movement or the Republican Party that encourages people to get behind so they're taking matters into their own hands to illustrate their grievances and their lack of approval of what's being done to them and their country and their kids' future.
So I look at this as all just it's great news, but the fact of the matter is, as far as the rest of the country is concerned, as far as the rest of the world is concerned, we love Obama.
He is larger than life.
He has saved our country's embarrassment, and we are all now proud as we can be as Americans to finally have a smart and brilliant and erudite president who's willing to go around the world and tell the rest of the world we mean them no harm.
And we do not constitute a threat, that we have made our mistakes in the past.
Why, Obama said, even in my own country, it wasn't long ago that most states didn't even let people like me vote, which is an out and out lie.
It was a few states that didn't let people like Obama vote, and they were run by Democrats and they were quickly overrun.
They were beaten back and they were defeated.
And he loves to go around the world saying, and I'm Barack Hussein Obama, and my country's changed a lot.
They'll elect somebody with a middle name Hussein.
He doesn't tell them he couldn't use his middle name during the campaign, and he doesn't tell them that if somebody on the McCain side did that, McCain threw them under the bus.
So the partisan gap in the Obama job approval is at the widest it's been ever in the modern era in the last 40 years.
Which means there is a lot of dissatisfaction with what Obama is doing, with what his policies are.
It is not being reported.
In fact, it's being misrepresented.
And I've had somebody ask me last night why, Rush.
I mean, why I mean you say that the media is invested in Obama, but why are they going so overboard to present a picture of him that isn't true?
And the answer is because they know the picture they've presented all along isn't true.
It's, you know, their credibility is as much at stake as his is.
So they have to continually pump up who Obama is as a human being, much less a president, in order to keep the truth of his relative averageness and occasional incompetence and mediocrity from surfacing.
And the way they do that, I mean, all this silly reporting on how Michelle Obama captivated Europe with her wardrobe and her sense of style.
Notice that Michelle Obama didn't say diddly squat.
Just like Princess Diana never said much.
The royal family knew, okay, put her out there.
She looks great.
Let her stand next to the poor kids.
So but don't let her open her mouth, or we're cooked.
And same thing with Michelle.
You know, after the campaign, I never hated my country or loved my country or whatever she said until now, they don't let her say anything.
But she looks good.
Now we've got a story from advertising age.
Guess what?
All these magazine cover shit, they're not selling.
The Michelle Obama newspaper magazine covers do not sell.
It's all a giant myth.
This universal adoration and love.
It's a creation of the new Camelot.
Which also was a myth.
And this is a myth that has been created for consumption of people in this country and around the world.
The truth is quite something else.
And it will manifest itself at some point.
But I warn you again, do not ever expect the drive-by media to change.
They have to report above and beyond greatness.
They have to report superhuman.
They have to report everybody enthralled and bowled over.
Because that's the image they created way back during the campaign.
And their objective is to see to it that none of the reality of this guy ever sees the light of day in mainstream media or mainstream American thought.
All right, a brief time out.
We've got plethora of audio sound bites remaining, plus a lot of your phone calls, too.
And we'll get to all of it in just a sec.
Okay, to Houston, Texas next.
This is Paul.
Great to have you on the EIB network, sir.
Hello.
Hey, pleasure to talk to you, Rush.
And my question for you was how likely do you think it is that uh some of our defense cuts that we've made, like the F-22, some of these fast destroyers uh are appeasements for the Chinese buying up our debt to sort of empower their uh well that that that would require uh speculation.
I would I would rather put the cuts in defense where they belong.
I mean, you can blade the Chiccoms all you want, but it's Barack Obama ordering them, right?
Now who cares why?
If he's cutting, he's cutting the expansion of uh of defense systems, the Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates, who is a holdover from the Bush administration says, yeah, well, we don't really need all these anymore.
We're gonna go high tech.
We're gonna get more intel, we're gonna, we don't need the F 22, we don't need this, we don't need that, we don't need a new Navy uh destroyers, cruisers, whatever the hell they are.
This is just Obama.
Democrats do two things.
They raise taxes and cut defense.
Now, if you if you want to say that the Chicoms are having a role here, I'll tell you where the Chicoms are involved.
Does anybody but me, I mean, this is this was this is hilarious.
If it weren't so serious, it'd be hilarious.
There's Barry.
He's over in Europe promising a nuclear free world at the moment Kim Jong Yo launches his test missile.
And Obama says, Oh no, oh no, oh, I'm not naive.
I'm not naive.
Oh, I'm where.
Well, I'm where what's going on?
Uh oh, but I'm not knife.
So Kim Jong, I'll tell you, if you want Chicom involvement, the ChICOMs own us.
They are our banker.
We want more debt, we got to go to the Chikons.
The ChICOM's allies are North Korea and Iran.
This is the problem we have.
The Chicoms, they might be telling, hey, Obama, hey, bam, uh, you want to keep us as your banker, get rid of these weapons systems that can pose problems for us.
But our nukes do that anyway, and Obama's talking about getting rid of those too.
To people, this is like last week.
Folks, I gotta tell you something.
It's no, it's no wonder Obama's so damn popular over there.
Who's he talking to?
He's talking to Putin, he's talking to Medvedev.
He's talking to the KGB.
He's talking to the Iranians.
And he's talking only we're gonna lead the way.
Get rid of our nuclear weapons.
We're the only nice to never use them.
That means that we have a moral authority.
Get rid of ours, a moral leadership.
So the rest of the world has done.
And they're going, yay, what a great guy.
And Putin's looking at Medvedev and thinking, you believe this gift?
This loco weed's gonna get rid of his nukes.
And he thinks we're gonna get rid of them too.
We're gonna hell's bells will applaud that.
Damn right.
And when he wants to verify, we'll take him all over Siberia.
Say, see, there aren't any.
And the molocracy down in Iran, they're doing the same thing.
Of course he's popular.
He de-arming the United States, disarming the United States.
Now, the the this business with North Korea launching the nukes, this one.
Gates said there's nothing we can do to stop it.
The Japanese just had to watch it.
And they said if anything falls in our country, we're gonna go after it.
But nothing did.
It made it across Japan and into the Pacific Ocean.
Nobody do you realize the moral leadership or authority we have surrendered?
In claiming we can't stop the Iranians and we can't we can't stop.
You realize, do you realize how much is being repeated?
I'm gonna tell you who Obama is in world history.
Neville Chamberlain.
He is the spitting image of Neville Chamberlain.
Neville Chamberlain was as popular as Obama when he got back from visiting Hitler.
In fact, in fact, there is a story in the New York Times recently.
Might be today, might be yesterday, I forget which.
Hitler's economic policies were not bad for Germany.
The New York Times.
Hitler's economic policies, they weren't bad.
He got a little excessive here when the Holocaust uh got got got kicked up.
But Hitler's economic policies were not bad.
Well, now why would that assertion be made by the drive-bys who are hellbent on Obama being seen as something other than he is?
See, I'm I'm telling you the if you want to compare Obama to any way, compare him to Neville Chamberlain.
He comes back, he says we're gonna have peace in our time, and he's fetted, and he's agilated, and he is celebrated, and he is regaled.
And Obama's basically doing the same thing in his world tour.
We're going to have peace in our time.
We're going to get rid of our nuclear weapons.
By the way, the United States is not going to do all the awful things that we've been doing.
Now that I'm in charge...
We understand we're guilty of.
We're sorry, and we're gonna become mediocre like the rest of you.
That way you won't hate us.
Well, I um I I've been asked the question does do you think anybody believes he's really gonna get rid of nukes?
At this stage, with uh again using intelligence guided by experience, Mr. Snerdley, and looking at everything else Obama's getting rid of, you have to keep it open as a possibility.
You have to.
Look at that's who these people are.
That's who he is.
Don't you understand?
What is the nuclear freeze movement?
The global peace march for nuclear dis.
there are Americans, people around the world who think.
The only reason the world is at war is because of us.
We're too big.
We got to be cut down to size.
It's not fair there's only one superpower because we become a superpower, not because of our constitution, but we've stolen all these resources.
We've stolen the best people.
We've stolen everything.
We use it for ourselves.
We haven't paid it back.
People live in poverty because of us.
Obama believes this garbage, I'm afraid.
And do Medvedev and these guys hope that he uh or think that he means it?
Even if they don't, they're gonna try to encourage him to do it.
You gotta take it seriously.
Look, it's a very simple question.
If Obama does not intend to reduce our stockpile of nuclear weapons, why is he saying he does?
Why is it for adulation for so he's just saying it doesn't mean it, just saying it because he wants to get the adulation uh thought of doing just like not really going to get us out of Iraq, he's just gonna say so because he wants the adulation and all that.
Well, you may have a point.
The point is I know he won't be able to get rid of them, is the is the bottom line.
There would a Congress would stop him from doing this at some point.
It's yes, Pelosi's and Harry Reeds, yes, at some point that you know, sanity will emerge for fleeting moments when it's necessary, otherwise, you know, it'll remain hidden behind the rocks.
Anyway, behind the the phones we go next.
And we're gonna go to uh Chicago.
This is Charles.
Charles, thank you for waiting and for calling.
Great to have you here.
Hello.
Thanks, Rush.
Rush, listen, I I uh voted the Republican, and uh I didn't I didn't really didn't want to see Obama get in office.
But you know, Rush, i you're one reason to blame for this election for the Republicans losing.
First of all, you kept tarping about voting for uh Hillary.
The second big issue uh is the was a torture issue.
I'm a veteran.
We're not supposed to be torturing these people.
This is not Nazi Germany, Red China, or North Korea.
There's other ways of interrogating people.
And you kept parping about uh it's okay or it's not really torture.
And it was just more than waterboarding.
Somebody's some of these prisoners were killed under torture.
And uh i i it's just it was crazy for you to keep going on and on like uh like uh Levine and Hannity and uh you it uh it's like you're all brainwashed.
And my last comment is no matter what Obama does, you you will still criticize him because I believe you're you're brainwashed.
You you're just uh it and I hate to say it, but I I I think you're a a brainwashed Nazi.
Anyone who can believe in torture, uh just uh it has got to be there's gotta be something wrong with him.
You know, I know Bush wanted to keep us safe and all of that, but uh we we're not supposed to be torturing these people.
Charles.
If anybody is admitting that they are brainwashed, it would be you.
No, no, no, Rush.
I don't think so.
Uh Charles Charles.
You know it said at the beginning of your phone call that you didn't want Obama in there, but you voted for him because of me.
I didn't vote for him.
I voted for McCain.
I voted Republican.
Oh, so you're saying I turned people off.
You turned people off with all your all this uh vote for Hillary and all this B as well.
That was Operation Chaos.
That was to keep the chaos in the dose of the Democrat primaries.
Sour grapes.
That's all we have.
And believe me, I'm not I'm not uh more uh more to the right than I am to the left.
Oh, you of course you are.
I am of course you are.
You wouldn't be calling here with all these sour grapes if you were.
I don't know of anybody who died from torture.
I do not ever remember World War II that the Neuenberg trials.
You remember the Neuenberg trials?
Charles.
Cross Barby.
Charles Barack Obama.
What's the matter with you?
You never even served in the military.
Barack Obama.
Charles, Barack Obama is president of the United States today because of stupid, ignorant people who think like you do.
You pose, you and your ignorance are the most expensive commodity this country has.
You think you know everything.
You don't know diddly squat.
You call me a Nazi.
You call me somebody who supports torture.
And you want credibility on this program.
You know, you're just plain embarrassing and ludicrous.
But it doesn't surprise me that you're the kind of Republican that our last candidate attracted.
Because you're no Republican at all based on what the hell you've said here.
Karen in Cedar Rapids, Iowa.
Welcome to the EIB Network, sir.
Hello.
Oh, thank you.
I'm on the Rush Lindboss show.
Yes, you are.
It's your big showbiz break.
She doesn't know she's not.
Karen, hello, testing 123.
Karen, are you there?
Hello, Rush, I am here.
I was about to offer you a free motorized segue if you showed up here.
I'm sorry.
Hey, Rush, I want to know why.
No one is talking about the eighty billion dollar increase that's going to occur with the oil business.
And how it's going to be a good idea.
What do you think?
What eighty billion dollar increase in the oil business?
According to Obama's stimulus package, there is going to be an eighty billion dollar increase.
And I know this in what?
Because my father received a letter from the president of Chevron.
My father worked for Chevron for over 35 years.
And the president wrote him a letter and said, please contact your senator and Congressman regarding this $80 billion package.
What is it in what what is it?
Well, it's a tax that's going to be put on the oil industry on top of their already overtaxed industry.
And I really believe it's because Obama wants to destroy not only the coal industry, but also the oil industry as well.
And it's gonna it's gonna come down to us, the consumers.
It's gonna affect our truckers, uh the cost of food.
Well, you know, I the the the big thing that that was gonna do all that really was the cap and trade uh idea, and it apparently is on its last legs for now.
I mean, that's nothing to prevent them from coming back to try it, but uh cap and trade uh is is is in fact this is a political story today here, and I've noticed let me find it.
All the drive-by analysts have been parroting this.
Yeah, here it is.
Reality hits Obama Express.
Administration officials are most pessimistic about his energy and global warming plan.
Uh many aids doubting he'll win passage of a cap and trade emissions reduction system, which is strongly opposed by business and Republicans.
White House is most optimistic for passage this year of his plans to overhaul the nation's financial regulations.
And aides uh also agree, say see a strong chance that a gradual version of his health care overhaul will get through Congress this fall.
The best case scenario, Obama aides admit they don't know yet the answer to one of the big questions of the year.
Can Capitol Hills swallow an agenda of this cost in heft at a time when the country is suffering a catastrophic economic slowdowns?
It looks like now they're putting the story out.
Again, we're we're hamstrung here by what the hell do we believe, especially coming out of the drive-by media, but bank regulation appears to be the only thing likely to happen in the near term.
And it's true, he's taken on a lot of things, and and Washington traditionally does not do a lot of things real fast, particularly uh in in Congress.
So if cap and trade is in fact in trouble, if they're right that he's gonna have trouble winning passage on cap and trade, then that that's gonna save the coal industry.
Uh that's for a while for the time being.
Cap and trade would put the coal industry out of business as Obama promised.
Now, uh I think that the reality is that he's got three years remaining, and he can come back for this at uh at at any time.
Uh I know that some tax breaks for big oil were eliminated in the uh in the in the stimulus bill.
Uh but uh I guess that's the 80 billion that uh that you're talking about.
There's no question that the Obama administration wants the cost of gasoline back up.
They want the can they that four dollars is the per gallon is the magic price.
Because at four bucks, that would that's when you stop buying SUVs.
That's when you start looking at these miniature little cars that they want everybody in.
Quick timeout.
We'll be back.
We'll continue after this.
Stay with us.
I was asked earlier, ladies and gentlemen, by somebody doubting me.
Do you really think Obama intends to get rid of nuclear weapons?
And do you really think all these world leaders think that he means it?
Let me read to you from the Associated Press.
The writer of the story, Anne Gieran.
She says that Obama's no nuclear weapons promise is not so far-fetched.
And this is what suffices as AP analysis.
Nuclear weapons have become more trouble than they are worth, an expensive luxury for superpowers and a threat for the rest of the world.
Nuclear weapons have become more trouble than they're worth.
Who the hell believes that?
I dare say only the American left believes that.
I'll guarantee him to you, Putin doesn't believe it.
I'll guarantee him to you the mullahs and uh little Mahmood don't believe it, and I will guarantee you that Kim Jong il does not think that they are more trouble than they are worth.
They probably all do agree with the fact that they are a luxury and a threat for the rest of the world.
I'm sure they agree with that.
That's why they want them.
Here's the second bit of analysis from the brilliant Anne Gearin at AP.
The size of the U.S. and Russian arsenals inspires nuclear starter states like China to add to their stockpiles and give non-nuclear states a reason to join the club.
That's right out of the belief system Obama, I'm sure grew up with being taught.
That the rest of the world is mean because we are, that the rest of the world has weapons because we are no moral distinction whatsoever.
There's a moral equivalence.
We're bad, therefore they're bad.
We behave in a braggadocious bullying way, in their view.
It's only natural the world would stand up to us.
It's all our fault.
And this is the AP agreeing with it.
And a lot of the American left does too.
And then this is the PS de resistance.
This is the third analysis point from Ann Guerin of AP.
Getting serious about eliminating nuclear weapons make the U.S. more credible when it argues that states such as Iran should not be able to build their own arsenals.
So they these naive little people believe that if we get serious about eliminating nuclear weapons, we are more credible when we tell the Iranians not to.
It's not, Mr. Snertley, they will think we are fools.
They do.
They think we're fools for electing Obama already.
I guarantee you that the mullahs and Putin and Medvedev and uh and Hujento in China celebrated today Obama got elected because they know what liberals in this country believe.
They believe all of the Soviet communist propaganda that was put out for 40 years.
It's the U.S.'s fault.
That's why he's going to be applauded.
That's why I told you he is applauded.
He's applauded over there.
These people hope he means it.
They're going to try to hold him to it.
They're going to make him try to do this because they're going to lie to him and tell him they're interested in the same thing, except the Iranians.
The Iranians will not because they'll claim that they need to wipe uh Israel off the map.
To which people will yawn.
You know, no big deal.
Who's next?
This is uh Kyle.
Kyle in Pittsburgh.
Great to have you, sir, on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hello, Rush.
Uh, I just wanted to say that I uh I agree with you that uh these cars are the new features, are not to help the disabled but to handicap the able-bodied.
Absolutely.
Because there's already these tons of features that are in new cars that are like the smart features, and um there's a whole bunch of them, and they basically they any time a car has a smart feature, it assumes that the driver is getting dumber.
Give me an example of the kind of smart features in cars you're talking about here.
Like my car, for example, um, has an automatic sensor where the lights come on as soon as the sun starts to go down.
Right.
So no matter any time I'm in my car at night, I cannot turn the lights off, even if it's just idling or for whatever reason.
Well, you need to get a better car because my car has that too, but I can turn them off anytime I want.
Okay.
Well, I guess I need to get a better car, but there's a whole bunch of features.
Yeah, have you got the uh you've got the nav system that talks to you?
No, no nav system.
You don't have a nav system.
Oh, you ought to try one of those.
I'm waiting for uh Obama to give me one.
Well, it'll be there.
It's gonna be there in the little uh wheelchair with a motor.
And it's it's brilliant because it's gonna keep you from ever running into a pedestrian and pedestrian from running into you.
Spare tire is a walker, and if that breaks down, there's a cane.
And both of them have GPS in them, so you can walk across the street, nobody will hit you because it's got a GPS unit in the cane or in the walker.
It's a brilliant device.
I think it'll be fun.
Golf cart, a new tow truck for these things.
Now, I've I've been checking my email.
And this is predictable.
This it's it's it's it's identical, in fact, to what happened when I first started getting on the Sierra Club in 1995 when they started making noises about getting rid of and banning the SUV.
I spent a lot of time on that, and I tried to warn people.
They said, come on, Rush, there's serious things happening out there.
You're boring me to death.
Will you get off of this and get onto the issues?
And lo and behold, I've had some emails today.
You think you're funny talking about this stupid little wheelchair with a motor, but it's not funny.
This is the first time I've ever turned you off in 20 years, and I don't know that I'm ever going to turn the radio back on.
I've never been more bored.
Same thing that happened.
Twelve years ago, 14 years ago, when I warned you people about the SUV.
And all I've said about this is this is something nobody wants.
This is not being in fact, what happened to the first segue?
Where the hell is the first one?
This is the two-wheeler that you stood on.
Where is it?
You see some lazy mole cops rolling around on them at the malls, but aside from that, where do you see one?
Where do you see an average citizen driving around with a Segway?
Maybe you see them at Whole Foods.
I don't know.
I don't go into Whole Foods.
You see them in there.
Where do you see one?
And remember how that was touted.
It was the new it.
It was going to change the world.
Remember all the build-up USA today for a week before the internet?
It didn't change anything.
And now they're going to put a motor on one.
Spare me, folks.
You know, you gotta you're gonna have to learn to trust me and not doubt me.
What are you leaving radio on or not?
It's for your own good.
Why else am I doing this?
On tap for tomorrow, whatever happens between now and then this newsworthy, but also this from the BBC.
Sisters make people happy.
Sisters spread happiness while brothers breed distress.
This, according to family experts, who have uh quizzed 571 people between 17 and 25 about their lives.
Growing up with sisters means you're more likely to be happy with brothers.
Mean and miserable.
Details tomorrow.
▲
Export Selection