All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 19, 2008 - Rush Limbaugh Program
33:56
December 19, 2008, Friday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Okay, lots to do here in our remaining hour of open line Friday, so let's just get started here.
Live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida.
It's open line Friday.
And here's the telephone number if you want to be on the program.
And remember, on Friday, you can talk about pretty much anything you want.
The number is 800-282-2882.
Email address Lrushball at EIB net.com.
Snerdley.
Little interesting factoid.
And for all of you football fans.
The Pittsburgh Steelers.
Like I just got a note from the Hutch.
The Reverend Dr. Hutch.
Ken Hutcherson in Seattle.
And he jabs me about the Steelers all the time.
He says, Look, my brother, your Steelers can't keep winning games in the last two minutes.
They're going to eventually meet a team that's going to outscore them so much that whatever they do in the last two minutes isn't going to matter.
You know, and I wrote the Hutchbacks.
Yeah, yeah, you're right.
You're right, Hutch.
That's the easiest way to deal with a Hutch.
He's telling me he's right.
Here's the thing, though.
Last week against the Baltimore Ravens, everybody was talking about the Steelers and the lack of offense and uh and so forth and so on.
And uh how the how are the Ravens uh able to move the ball on the Steelers so well?
And they really didn't.
I mean, the Steelers have not given up a 300 yard game this year in total offense.
They haven't, but listen to this statistic.
The Steelers' last six opponents have not been called for offensive holding.
Twenty-four quarters, six games without a holding penalty, being called against the offensive line or anybody on the offense against the Steelers' defense.
And last week, James Harrison, number 92 defensive, uh well, he's an outside linebacker, but was held on virtually every play.
The NFL is not calling holding penalties, and yet the Steelers' defense is still number one, number one, and number one.
The first three categories of defense, they're number one, number one, number one.
Now, there is a letter to the editor at the American thinker.com today.
I just touched on it.
Dear editor.
I don't know if anybody else has noticed this, but I have detected a new crisis that I have named the daylight change crisis.
I first noticed it sometime around the end of June this year.
I started paying attention and created computer models.
And sure enough, I was right.
We are losing daylight at an astonishing rate.
Each day we're losing approximately two minutes of daylight.
My computer models predict total darkness by next July.
I have been able to detect this phenomenon around the entire northern hemisphere.
Even beyond my computer models, I have personally witnessed it.
And here's the scary part.
The daylight appears to be leaking to the southern hemisphere.
I thought I should bring it to the attention of great scientists like Al Gore.
So he can help stop this new crisis.
This is actually brilliant.
And this is brilliant because this is this is a great illustration of how the entire global warming scare is happening.
In the summertime, they will tell you the ice at the Antarctic and the Arctic circles is disappearing.
They never tell us about the disappearing ice this time of year.
They never tell us about the increasing ice.
I thought it was pretty good.
AP, you know that ladies and gentlemen, there's a the the the media's getting a little testy here.
Uh a little testy with with uh with Obama.
And there the two pieces here from ABC News, the note about how Obama is not taking any questions in these press conferences, how he's not saying anything at the press conferences, he's not providing information the press wants, such as who and his staff spoke to Blogo however many times.
He's putting it off until next week, blaming it on Fitzgerald.
And today, the second piece from ABC, Words Matter, Pablum from the President elect.
This is ABC News.
Every day this week, Obama has held a press conference to introduce new members of his team.
In each instance, he has said not a whole lot.
See, I've told you this.
They're just not catching up to it.
Obama says nothing.
He just says it better than anybody else.
It's how he says what he says.
It's not what he says.
Here's a sampling from Obama's recent statements.
Monday.
In the next few years, the choices we make will help determine the kind of country and world that we will leave to our children and grandchildren.
Tuesday.
In the next few years, the decisions we make about how to educate our children will shape our future for generations to come.
On Wednesday, opening statement included this.
Our wide open spaces are not only a blessing to be enjoyed, they are the foundations of a brighter future.
through.
On Thursday, we need to restore and renew those rules today so that every American from Wall Street to Main Street can have the chance to prosper once more.
Then the thankful appointees do their best imitations of Oscar winners.
Thank you, Mr. President elect.
Wish to thank you, Mr. President elect.
Then come a few questions where Obama's main goal seems to be not to answer.
They're getting a little testy.
The note from this morning, ABC News The Note.
A last burst of picks will be announced Friday by Obama at 215.
It'll take a few questions.
You know the drill by now.
Apparently, all it took was four press conferences plus this flare-up on the left to ensure no more questions about Blogoyovich.
And that's what they want to know.
They want to know about Bolgoych.
The a the media doesn't care about Rick Warren.
Only the gay activists care about Rick Warren.
The media wants to know about Blogoyevitch, and he's not saying anything.
And they're saying Clinton gets away with his 2,000 page document dump this week.
Obama gets to dump whatever news he has next week.
While nobody is around, report on it because it's Christmas week.
Pay attention or what have you.
AP is reporting President elect Obama says the government has been asleep at the switch.
When it comes to overseeing the nation's financial system, he says Americans are feeling frustrated that there's not a lot of adult supervision.
However, Citigroup, Citigroup's primary federal regulator is Timothy Geithner.
Obama's pick for Treasury Secretary.
The guy who was in charge of regulating what was going on at Citibank and watching it, the adult who was awake at the switch, did nothing while Citibank imploded, and Obama has made him, ladies and gentlemen, the Treasury Secretary.
Obama can't get by without a few friends helping him along, ladies and gentlemen.
E.I.B. Rush Limbaugh program.
It's open line Friday, and I have America's real anchor man.
America's truth detector.
And the doctor of democracy.
Here's Grant in Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Hi, Grant.
Great to have you with us on the phone today.
Hey, how are you doing?
Very well, thank you.
Good.
Hey, I hear you talk a lot about how people that can't pay their own way.
You know, you you gripe about people that go to the doctor and the hospital and stuff like that and can't pay their own way.
If you're in an accident or you break your leg or you hurt working and you can't pay the copay, or just can't pay for it outright.
What should happen to people like that?
In the first place, to correct your premise, I do not gripe about people who can't pay their own way.
Today and yesterday, for example, I spent countless minutes explaining why that's the case when it comes to health care.
It is an absolute, it borders on the criminal what has happened in health care.
The L the artificial elevation in price versus value.
There's no way a band-aid cost 300 bucks in a hospital.
There's no way it costs 300, but that's what it's going to cost you because somebody else is paying the bill, and because there are a lot of people that go to hospital that don't pay, So those who do pay have to pick it up.
I have I what what I'm the point I'm trying to make here about all this is that all of this debt that people have taken on, the government, financial institution, banks, all these with high leverages, 30 to 10 ratio, I mean it's absurd to have uh only one dollar on hand for every $30 you owe that's going to come home to roost someday, and it elevates the price of houses, it elevates the price of every good and service.
When you go buy a car, you're really not buying a $35,000 car, you're buying whatever monthly payment you can afford.
When you buy a house, you're not buying a $250,000 house, you're buying a mortgage with the monthly rate you can afford.
Um, and and the house is not yours for 25 or 30 years, depending on the uh on the length of the mortgage.
Uh if if every if everything was priced in such a way that you you could only buy it if you paid the full price, I guarantee you the price of everything would be lower.
Now there are exceptions, obviously.
People cannot go out and buy houses by writing a check, and most people can't go out and buy cars.
And debt's a good thing.
I mean, it's using other people's money uh for development uh to increase the quality of life is fine, but when you when debt extends to buying debt to buy more debt so that with that debt you can buy more so-called securities, which the last thing they are these days is secure.
This just has a rollover yo-yo effect here that elevates the price of everything, so that when you do break your leg or you do have something catastrophic, you're you're out of luck.
There's no way you can pay for it.
But fifty years ago people could.
Okay.
Forty years ago people could, before the government got involved.
The problem here is not insurance companies.
The problem is people who don't pay, and government who makes up for it by taxing everybody else and hospitals who have to raise their prices.
Now, you're I know the root of your question is basically I'm a I'm a pick 'em up by the bootstraps guy.
You think you hear me speak, and what you're thinking is let everybody fend for themselves and come hell or high water.
Well, I'm I'm kind of gathering that, yes.
No.
Quite the opposite.
I think that those in this country who are capable should be left alone to reach whatever height they choose.
If you want to have a life where your income is $20,000 a year, that your business isn't fine, don't blame anybody else when you don't earn $30 or 40 if you're satisfied with 20.
At the same time, I think that the the notion here that people's lives are improved.
Their self-love, their self-appreciation is enhanced by their achievements, by the things they accomplish.
If you just give capable people things, they're not going to achieve it.
They're going to come to expect it.
And they're going to reach a comfort level at some point that will limit them further in working on their own behalf.
But they're also going to resent the fact that a lot of people have more than they do because they think the system is rigged when it isn't.
Now, um there are plenty of people in our society who are sick, who are for whatever reason incapable of helping themselves, and we're compassionate people.
And I and a whole lot of other Americans will go out of our way to help our fellow citizens who literally can't help themselves.
What bugs a lot of people is to see entirely capable people give up on life and decide to become dependent on whatever their elected official or government can do for them because we look at that, I look at that grant, and I look at the people in government as helping to destroy those people's lives.
See, I believe we all only get one life.
We all only get one chance, and it's so precious.
We're so busy living our lives, we don't stop to think how fortunate we are to be alive and what that means.
We don't stop to think how fortunate we are to be human rather than say a dog or cat.
We're too busy.
We live our lives in the greatest country on earth, a country that offers and has since its inception, more opportunity, more freedom, more prosperity than human beings in history, any human beings in history have ever known.
It is simply unnecessary for Americans to check out.
It is unnecessary for capable Americans to give up.
It is unnecessary for capable Americans to feel down on their luck as America because everybody has bad luck.
But if there's one place on this planet where bad luck can be turned to good fortune with a little action, it's the United States of America.
Be thankful you don't live in Cuba.
Be thankful you don't live in Venezuela.
Be thankful you don't live in Russia.
Be thankful you don't live in the Middle East.
You live in the best place on earth.
Genuine achievement through work is one of the most self-rewarding things.
It is where many people really take their identities from their work, what they accomplished, their passions, their desires, what it is they really do and go out and do it, and they make things for other people.
They invent things for other people.
They perform services for other people.
And they try to do it, those that really succeed to the best of their ability.
Now I don't have resentment for those who aren't trying.
I have pity.
And I also don't entirely blame them.
Many of them have been told by Democrat liberal politicians for decades that the deck is stacked against them in this country because they're either black or they're women or they're some kind of minority or what have you, and that evil rich Republicans and white people, or whatever, whatever other kind of successful people you're talking about, are preventing them from getting where they want to go.
This country will permit anybody to get where he wants to go if that person has stick to it, has a little dose of realism, and understand it isn't going to be easy, and there's going to be a lot of unfairness along the way, and there's going to be a lot of excrement sandwiches along the way, but there are going to be tremendous rewards too.
But if you if you believe in a political philosophy that says your your chances are nil, you really don't have any hope.
The country's best days are behind it.
And the only way we can make things fair is to take from those who have unfairly achieved more than others.
Well, then you're going to sit around and they're they're asking you to be made happy by the suffering of others, not by your own success and good fortune.
I think it's a I think it's a crying shame, but it's reality.
It's a crying shame we've gotten to the point where you use your example, you have a car wreck and you break your leg and you have to go to the hospital and you have to stay there for a couple days or weeks, depending on how bad it is, that you can't afford it.
But there is insurance for it now.
The insurance is high priced, as we all know.
Most employers people think are paying for it, but you have to realize you're paying for everything you get.
You just don't see a lot of it.
You're paying for your benefits package at work.
You just never see it.
And if I I've long contended that if people were given the full boat of what they're paid in a form of salary, then you go by your health care, and then you go by this, and you go, whatever the company the company's providing for you, I guarantee you that happening in mass nationwide, all that competition for services prices would come down.
We're going the wrong direction here, though, Grant.
We're talking about nationalizing health care.
Obama wants to make sure that everybody's insured and that everybody gets coverage.
With the illusion that nobody's going to be paying for it.
You are going to be paying for it, and so am I. But this despite this recession, we got more opportunity than 99% of people in the world here.
I want to play a soundbite here.
President Bush.
This was yesterday during an interview with Chris Demuth, who is the uh president of the American Enterprise Institute Institute.
Remember the president uh new tone when he came to office, and I begrudged it.
I say ain't gonna work.
You can't make friends with Democrats, they don't want to be friends with you, they're just gonna take advantage of you.
There's no need for a new tone.
We're not the bad guys.
The Republicans are not a bad guy.
We're coming out of eight years at Clinton, impeachment, Lewinsky, and all that sort of stuff.
We weren't the bad guys.
We never are the bad guys, very rarely.
Yet this defensive need that we have to somehow show everybody we're not bad guys.
So the new tone came along.
Bush spoke about it yesterday.
I came with the idea of changing the tone in Washington, and frankly didn't do a very good job of it.
Oh, no.
I fully understand that.
No.
Surely we can do a better job in Washington of treating each other with respect.
Oh, no.
I don't want to be a self-serving fellow, but I have never used my position as president to personally denigrate somebody.
Oh.
And so that's that's something I'm not gonna miss it at all.
Disappointed how the words that came out of people's mouth, and I'm very disappointed of how the process has treated some of my friends.
See, he's he's he he knows it didn't work.
But he's such a decent guy, is blaming himself for this, which is which is compounding it.
He went out of his way.
Ted Kennedy writing the education bill.
The Kennedy family up there in White House Theater eating popcorn watching a Kevin Coxler Kennedy movie.
He went out of his way.
And today he takes the bla we're gonna have to get somebody someday on our side who stands up and doesn't take the hit.
In the interests of getting along, in the interests of comedy, in the interests of bipartisanship.
We're gonna need somebody who's willing to point fingers when necessary.
Because we're only talking about the heart and soul of the country here, really talking about what kind of country we're gonna be.
We're not talking about whether or not Chuck Schumer, Ted Kennedy, Caroline Schlossberg, Harry Reed, like us.
Diane in Cincinnati, I'm glad you called.
Nice to have you on Open Line Friday.
Hi.
Hi, Rush.
I'm so glad to get on your show.
Thank you.
Um I'll just try to make it brief because I'm nervous, but um, I've learned I'm about your age, and our parents have so much wisdom, and I hope that we know always learn from them.
What I've learned from my parents and some of those other stellar citizens of of their age.
Is that like you said, um, I think it was in your last callers comments.
You said, and amen to all that, uh you said um we used to we have a heart, we used to provide out of our pockets for our people, our friends in need.
We still do.
Yeah, yes, but back then when I was in school, the the little children who needed help were not um labeled.
They just got escorted out and they got their dental exams and their um whatever they needed from a doctor free of charge, and nobody paid for it.
The doctor gave it out of his time in um his pocket.
And uh it was understood, and everybody well well, but my my point is this advertising that we're doing now.
We've seen advertising in the health care industry and a legal industry as well that we never saw before that's eating up all this money.
We've got too many middlemen in the middle getting we've got a whole layer of marketing people who are making a living on uh uh just like um they're like agents to get us to the doctor and the medicine in our in front of our faces.
We don't need to see the medicine uh on TV and hear about it.
We don't need to we can go to the doctor.
This is true, but it's a free country, and if you have a product that you want to sell and it's prescription only, what better way to do it than advertised on TV and get the patients running to the doctor saying, hey, I just saw the buttons, whatever it is, can you explain it to me?
There are a lot of reasons why health care costs have gone up.
Um I've the advertising budgets, you know, pr small, small percentage of it.
Uh tort lawyers, trial lawyers, and and uh uh with with with the suing doctors and so forth.
This has led to constant tests of patients that are not necessary.
Uh it hit which adds to the bill, uh medical malpractice insurance.
There are there are a lot of things.
There's no question.
I'm folks, look at uh I I'm speaking here as an American.
If you if you spend time looking at what has driven up these costs, you're going to find people that don't believe in the free market.
You're gonna find liberals, you're gonna find big government believers uh who are behind all of this.
Pure and simple, and they have created much of the dependency among people that we constantly discuss here.
Gainesville, Florida, Caroline.
Nice to have you with us on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hi.
Hi.
Yes, I'm calling in uh you were talking about the two minutes a day that we're losing in sunlight.
The crisis, yes.
Okay, well, if uh I've been studying This for a couple of years now.
Look at it.
It shows it in the uh Mayan calendar.
They have five calendars.
They have the uh the calendar that is uh the twenty-four hour day.
We don't use the Mayan calendar and they're extinct.
Listen to this.
This is the explanation now.
You want to hear it?
We are in a wobble and we're coming out of it because all of the planets are going around at different state places in the solar system, and they are soon going to be lining up.
And when they do, this is creating gravitational coal shifting and everything.
It's straightening the earth up, so it's going to be spinning like a top.
Just fine.
It's not going to have a wobble anymore.
And whenever it's spinning like that, it's spinning faster.
And of course we're going around and we're faster, and we're losing these minutes.
So we're going into this new Mayan calendar.
They wrote it, they experienced it, and we're going to be straightening it up, but we're not going to be wobbling.
My friends, um, let me confirm what uh Caroline here in Gangsville, Florida is saying, if the wobble is ending, then we in the Northern Hemisphere by next June or July will be out of light.
It will be permanently dark.
Uh with the computer models indicate this.
We're losing two minutes of light a day.
There's no end in sight to this.
Uh and if it keeps up, computer models say we're out of we're we're in total darkness.
And she's right, all the lights going down in the southern hemisphere.
And I guess even the Mayan calendars, all five of them, predicted this.
Bill in St. Paul, Minnesota.
Nice to have you on the EIB network.
Hi, Rush.
Uh Merry Christmas to you.
Thank you, sir.
Very much.
Appreciate it.
Um I got a solution to the daylight we're losing.
Uh everybody lights a cigar come around uh April or May.
There'll be much more light for us out there.
Yeah, it could be.
We need to do we need to probably take some drastic steps.
One thing get rid of all the compact fluorescence and go back to standard light bulbs.
They produce more heat, uh, more light.
There's any number of things we can do to combat this.
Well, I was thinking, uh, who could I talk to to ask this question?
Someone who had uh an idea of how the economy works and how politics works and has a real genuine interest in the pursuit.
So I thought I'd ask you when you think we'll be able to get Cuban cigars here in the U.S. legally, and what do you think will happen with the prices of the darn things once they're available and demand and it is going to be a long time before you will be able to get Cuban cigars legally in the United States.
Uh let's even if the embargo, let's say Barack Obama comes in and and and lifts the embargo, even if he does, even if he lifts the embargo, it's gonna happen in stages.
The first thing he'll lift is travel restrictions.
Uh but I don't think he's gonna go very quickly on opening up full-fledged trade with uh with Cuba.
But even if he did, let's say even if he did, you have no clue what is ahead of us as cigar smokers.
What will happen is that the domestic manufacturers uh d defined by those who who are in the Dominican and in Honduras, uh Nicaragua, uh Cameroon, all of the places where elements of cigars are grown,
and all the places where they're assembled, these people have in many cases marketed the brands of the Cuban cigars you're talking about, Hoyo de Monterey, Punch, Romeo y Julieta, uh all of the Simon Bolivar, all of these great Cuban brands have been marketed by other owners in the United States, and they are gonna go to the Commerce Department, and they're going to say we have made these brands popular.
We have invested in the product and in the brand in this country, and they're going to see they're gonna they're gonna ask the commerce department to ban the import of competing brand name cigars from Cuba.
The second thing that'll happen is that the domestic producers I'm talking about, from the people in Dominican to uh Nicaragua, Honduras, they are going to say we want raw Cuban tobacco to be able to blend it with our cigars.
They're gonna do everything they can to keep the Cuban cigars you want out of this country legally in a host of ways.
Then we haven't even discussed the Cuban exile community in Florida and other places they live.
They are gonna be all over the State Department saying we want our property back.
That Castro took from us.
That's why they have been alive.
They want their property back and they want their factories back and they want their companies back, and some of them are cigars, some of them are rum.
It's if the embargo ends tomorrow, you aren't going to see a legitimate Cuban cigar for years in this country.
Sounds insurmountable.
It really does.
It is insurmountable.
Unless somebody waves a magic wand.
But just stop and think of it from the competitive standpoint of all these people that have their own Hoyo, who have their own punch cigars, who have their own Romeo Joy, have their own Monte Cristos, Well, Monte Cristo is a different circumstance because the company that owns the Cuban Monte Cristo is in Spain, and they also use the brand here.
So that might be able to get some of theirs in.
You might be able to get a Monte Cristo from Cuba, depending, but then you're still you're you're gonna have look at you can't have these Cuban cigars come in.
Who's gonna make the Cubans change their brands?
The brand and the brand names are older than ours.
So it's it's it's gonna be a black market for uh quite a while.
Besides Obama smoke cigarettes.
He's not gonna have much interest in that's another thing.
I saw something the other day.
It's about Obama smoking.
Although those funny pictures when he was young and posing uh with what looks like doobies uh for that professional student photographer uh smoking cigarettes and so forth.
And somebody asked him about well, you know, you can't smoke in the White House.
Smoking's been banned in the White House.
It has not.
My friends, uh the there are there's some of the craziest things out there in the news.
Smoking has not been banned in the White House.
In certain parts of the White House you can't smoke, certain parts you can.
I've done it.
There are this the smoking band in the White House is Mrs. Clinton.
And so Clinton had to go out of the Trouban library, the Truman uh the Truman uh uh patio, Truman balcony.
You cannot smoke in the Lincoln bedroom.
You cannot smoke in the Queen's room, and I'm sure that the the the the don't smoke in the butt just trust me, if he's the president.
If he wants smoke a cigarette someplace, I damn well assure you he's gonna find a place in the White House to smoke a cigarette.
Nobody will see it.
Those who do see it, Secret Service Guard, they'll never say a word about it, and we'll never know.
But you can smoke in the White House.
This is absurd.
Can't smoke in the White House.
My friends, I don't want to divulge too much of what I know here, but you can smoke in the White House.
Not the Oval Office, doesn't happen in there, doesn't happen in the cabinet room, doesn't happen in the West Wing, doesn't it?
You can smoke in the White House.
It's a big, big place.
Before I I gotta take a break here, I need to share with you.
I got I've had so many emails come in for the past two weeks on people who sign up at Life Lock, the identity theft and uh I wouldn't expect to get a whole lot of testimonials because you know identity theft is a is a is a hit and miss thing.
It happens a lot, but there are a lot of identities in this country.
And it's amazing how many people have written to me saying life lock identified an attempt by somebody to steal their identity and stopped it.
You know, life lock, even if even if somebody does succeed in stealing your identity, which is difficult if life lock's on the case, they'll still promise you up to million dollars.
But all these computer databases that have been hacked, all of these hotel and and look at the the credit business, all these records of people's bills and so forth.
I tell you, it is it is something to say.
It's as smart as having carbonite and backing up your your hard drive as smart as using side cam to stop your cold.
Uh these are preventatives.
They rip they are things that will save you so much hassle if it happens to you.
You do not want to have your identity theft.
Or stolen, rather.
So it's lifelok.com and the offer code obviously is rush.
We'll be back.
Stay with us.
Okay.
Okay, Obama.
Press conference today.
Question Do you think an auto czar is needed?
And are you likely to offer suggestions?
I have not had an opportunity, nor has my economic team to look at all the details of the plan.
So I wouldn't want to comment about what changes I would want to make before I've even seen what's already on the table.
I do want to emphasize the automakers and their executives.
Here we get the Americans people's patience is running out.
Yes.
And that they should seize on this opportunity over the next several weeks and months to come up with a plan that is sustainable.
And that means that they're going to have to make some hard choices.
Now, this is really here's a guy so busy trying to find his wife a place to stay that he doesn't have time or his economic team to look at the plan to have an intelligent answer on it.
And his only answer is to point fingers of blame and threaten the automakers, as though he would know what to do if he had that kind of money and was said go restructure the autobus.
You know, this is...
I talked to people this morning about this bailout business.
And after it was explained to me, after they gave me their spin, I said, Does Obama know about it?
Oh, yeah, we kept him informed.
Did they have any role in putting it together?
No.
But we kept them informed.
He says here he has a no.
I'm not I trust the people I spoke to today.
They said we kept them informed.
To me, that means some of the details here are known.
Somebody in Obama's team knows.
He may not, because his wife's upset she can't get in a Blair House early.
He knows what they are.
He knows what I said.
Do you expect Obama to change it?
We don't know, but he can do whatever he wants with it once he gets office.
We hope he doesn't change it, but he can if he wants to.
Quick timeout.
We'll be back and wrap it up after this.
All righty then.
You eyes uh have a good weekend out there, ladies and gentlemen.
And unlike other talk show hosts, they're all taking the next two weeks off.
I will be here Monday.
See you then.
Can't wait.
▲
Export Selection